L2-Intro To Assessment
L2-Intro To Assessment
L2-Intro To Assessment
1
DISTINCTIONS AMONG ASSESSMENTS, TESTS,
MEASUREMENTS AND EVALUATION.
Assessments
Are used to gather information about students and include
Tests Nontests
Are systematic procedures for describing certain
characteristics of students using either
Measurement
To assign qualitative labels to students
To assign scores to students
Evaluation 2
ASSESSMENT
Assessment is a broad term defined as a process for obtaining
information that is used for making decisions about students; curricular,
programs and schools; and educational policy.
“We are assessing student’s competence” = “We are
collecting information to help us decide the degree to
which student has achieved the learning target”
4
5
TESTS
Tests is defined as an instrument or systematic procedure for observing
and describing one or more characteristics of a student using either
numerical scale or classification scheme.
Example : If you are a better speller than we are, a test that measure our spelling
activities should result in your score (your measurement) being higher than ours.
7
EVALUATION
Evaluation is defined as the process of making a value judgment about
the worth of a student’s product or performance.
For example : You may judge a student’s writing as exceptionally good for his grade
placement. This evaluation may lead you to encourage the student to enter a national
essay competition.
8
VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Validity is the soundness of your interpretations and uses of student’s
assessment’s results.
11
REMEMBER!
12
RELIABILITY OF ASSESSMENT RESULTS
Reliability is :
• the degree to which students’ results remain consistent over replications of an
assessment procedure.
• confidence that can be placed in an instrument to yield the same score for
the same student if the test were administered more than once and to the
degree with which a skill or trait is measured consistently across items of a test.
For ex : Your interpretations and decisions are less valid when your students’
assessments result are inconsistent. However, an assessment result’s degree of
reliability limits its degree of validity.
13
RELIABILITY OF ASSESSMENT RESULTS
For classroom teachers, the key to reliability is understanding to decide
what sort of consistency is important for different assessment purposes
(Parkes & Giron, 2006).
14
RELIABILITY OF ASSESSMENT RESULTS
1) Objective Test
For objective tests, students’ performance should be consistent from
item to item. Tests should have enough items that the consistency can
show itself.
For ex :
You have only one question about mathematic problem and the
student gets it right. How confident would you be in generalizing to say
that he has “100% mastery” in this area? Would you be more confident if
he got two items in this area correct?
15
RELIABILITY OF ASSESSMENT RESULTS
16
RELIABILITY OF ASSESSMENT RESULTS
3) Make up Work
For make up work, the reliability concern is consistency across occasions
and sometimes forms. If the student is making up work missed because
of absence, use the procedure to ensure equivalence.
For ex :
Students know not to tell their absent friends what questions are on a
test. Or the procedure could be to use another form of the same test or
assignment.
17
RELIABILITY OF ASSESSMENT RESULTS
For ex :
If you only ask a student one question about a chapter she read, how
sure are you that you can interpret the correct answer to mean that she
read and understood the whole chapter.
• Allow enough time for students to answer oral questions, or to do whatever you’re
observing.
18
RELIABILITY OF ASSESSMENT RESULTS
For ex :
You may engage members in rating others’ contributions to small group
work. In a group of four, you would have three ratings of each student,
which should more or less agree if they were all rating the same work.
19
RELIABILITY OF ASSESSMENT RESULTS
3) Self evaluation
For self evaluation, the most important reliability concern is accuracy of
self-judgement. Give the students lots of opportunity to practice.
20
THANK YOU
21