Dapa HF
Dapa HF
Dapa HF
Reduced) - Fu…
This is the classic website, which will be retired eventually. Please visit the modernized
ClinicalTrials.gov instead.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study
sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by
the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details.
Sponsor:
Boehringer Ingelheim
Collaborator:
Eli Lilly and Company
Study Details Tabular View Study Results Disclaimer How to Read a Study Record
Study Description Go to
Brief Summary:
https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT03057977 1/11
13/9/23, 21:41 Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and a Reduced Ejection Fraction - American College of Card…
References
Contribution To Literature:
The goal of the trial was to assess the safety and efficacy of empagliflozin in
patients with symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF),
irrespective of diabetes status.
https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Clinical-Trials/2020/08/28/16/12/EMPEROR-Reduced 1/9
13/9/23, 21:41 Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and a Reduced Ejection Fraction - American College of Card…
Study Design
Secondary outcomes:
Total hospitalizations: 388 vs. 553 (p < 0.001)
Composite renal outcome (chronic hemodialysis, renal transplantation,
profound sustained reduction in eGFR): 1.6 vs. 3.1 (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.77, p
< 0.01)
All-cause mortality: 13.4% vs. 14.2% (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77-1.10, p > 0.05)
New-onset type 2 diabetes among patients with prediabetes: 11.2% vs. 12.6%
(p > 0.05)
Change in hemoglobin A1c between baseline and week 52 (patients with
diabetes): -0.28 vs. -0.12% (p < 0.05)
Systolic blood pressure -2.4 vs. -1.7 mm Hg (p > 0.05)
Confirmed hypoglycemic event: 1.4% vs. 1.5%
Patients with volume overload within 4 weeks of enrollment: Primary endpoint for
empagliflozin vs. placebo among patients with recent volume overload: 28.4% vs.
24.8% (p = 0.035); without volume overload: 16.0% vs. 22.2% (p = 0.0004; p for
interaction = 0.34). Similarly, no difference was noted for the endpoint of total HF
hospitalizations by volume overload status (p for interaction = 0.09). Intensification
of diuretics was also similar between the two subgroups of patients (p for
interaction = 0.88). Similarly, there was no difference in NT-proBNP, systolic blood
pressure, or body weight for empagliflozin vs. placebo between patients with and
without recent volume overload.
Influence of MRAs: 71% on MRAs in this trial. Composite endpoint for
empagliflozin vs. placebo among MRA users: 18.6% vs. 24.4%; among nonusers:
21.2% vs. 25.8% (p for interaction = 0.83). Similarly, no interaction was observed
for secondary endpoints and adverse events (including hyperkalemia) by MRA use
as well.
Influence of region and race/ethnicity: Regional distribution: 36.3% Europe, 34.5%
Latin America, 11.4% in North America, and 13.2% in Asia; 70.5% were White, 6.9%
Black, and 18.0% Asian. Important differences were noted in baseline
characteristics. Placebo arm event rate (per 100 person-years) for the primary
outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization was highest in Asia (27.7)
and North America (26.4) and lowest in Europe (17.5). Event rate (per 100 person-
years) for the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF
hospitalization in the placebo group was highest among Black patients (34.4) and
lowest in White patients (18.7). The magnitude of the effect of empagliflozin on
the primary composite outcome and total hospitalizations for HF was most
pronounced in Asia (hazard ratios of 0.55 and 0.41, respectively); intermediate in
North America (hazard ratios of 0.69 and 0.71, respectively) and Latin America
(hazard ratios of 0.73 and 0.65, respectively); and least pronounced in Europe
(hazard ratios of 0.94 and 0.96, respectively) (p for interaction = 0.1). The
magnitude of the effect of empagliflozin on the primary composite outcome and
on total hospitalizations for HF was most pronounced in Black patients (hazard
ratios of 0.46 and 0.39, respectively) and Asian patients (hazard ratios of 0.57 and
0.45, respectively) and least pronounced in White patients (hazard ratios of 0.88
and 0.90, respectively) (p for interaction = 0.008).
Uric acid balance: The prevalence of hyperuricemia at baseline was 51.6 vs. 55.3%
(empagliflozin vs. placebo, p = 0.03). Elevated serum uric acid was associated with
advanced severity of HF and with worst outcome (composite outcome, HR 1.64
[95% CI 1.28-2.10]; cardiovascular mortality, HR 1.98 [95% CI 1.35-2.91]; all-cause
mortality, HR 1.8 [95% CI 1.29-2.49], all p < 0.001) in multivariable adjusted
analyses, as compared with the lowest tertile. Serum uric acid was reduced
following treatment with empagliflozin at 4 weeks (vs. placebo: −1.12 ± 0.04
mg/dL, p < 0.0001) and remained lower throughout follow-up. Treatment with
empagliflozin reduced the risk of clinically relevant hyperuricemic events by 32%
(HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.52-0.89], p = 0.004). The effect of empagliflozin on the primary
composite endpoint and on the risk of hospitalization for HF was not influenced
by serum uric acid.
0.96]). When the study drugs were withdrawn for ~30 days, the annualized risk of
cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization increased in patients withdrawn from
empagliflozin but not in those withdrawn from placebo (17.0 vs. 14.1 events per
100 patient-years for empagliflozin and placebo, respectively). After withdrawal,
the KCCQ-CSS declined by 1.6 in patients withdrawn from empagliflozin versus
placebo (p < 0.0001).
Interpretation:
Ferreira JP, Zannad F, Butler J, et al. Empagliflozin and serum potassium in heart
failure: an analysis from EMPEROR-Pooled. Eur Heart J 2022;43:2984-93.
Editorial: Verma S, Dhingra NK, Pandey AK, Cosentino F. Emerging role for SGLT2
inhibitors in mitigating the risk of hyperkalemia in heart failure. Eur Heart J
2022;43:2994-6.
Letter to the Editor: Packer M, Butler J, Zannad F, et al. Empagliflozin and Major
Renal Outcomes in Heart Failure. N Engl J Med 2021;385:1531-3.
Presented by Dr. Milton Packer at the European Society of Cardiology Virtual
Congress, August 27, 2021.
Lam CS, Ferreira JP, Pfarr E, et al. Regional and ethnic influences on the response
to empagliflozin in patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction: the
EMPEROR-Reduced trial. Eur Heart J 2021;42:4442-51.
Editorial Comment: Greene SJ, Khan MS. Quadruple Medical Therapy for Heart
Failure: Medications Working Together to Provide the Best Care. J Am Coll Cardiol
2021;77:1408-11.
Presented by Dr. Javed Butler at the American Heart Association Virtual Scientific
Sessions, November 13, 2020.
https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Clinical-Trials/2020/08/28/16/12/EMPEROR-Reduced 8/9
13/9/23, 21:41 Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and a Reduced Ejection Fraction - American College of Card…
https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Clinical-Trials/2020/08/28/16/12/EMPEROR-Reduced 9/9