1 PDF
1 PDF
1 PDF
..Applicant
(Mr. Anil Mittal, Advocate )
Versus
Delhi Transport Corporation,
I.P.Estate,
New Delhi – 110002.
(Through Chairman-cum-Managing Director)
..Respondent
(Mr. Sandeep Dey for Mr. Ayusha Kumar)
ORDER (ORAL)
Mathura has stated that the licences were not issued by them.
along with other similar OAs on 18.01.2017 and the show cause
Court.
him, and on the other hand, it was a light motor vehicle licence,
and that the applicant has relied upon the fake license. The
Mathura and they have since corrected their record. The said
The appeal filed against that order was rejected. This OA is filed
appellate authority.
submitted to the show cause notice and that there was no basis
submits that the proceedings were pending for quite a long time
applicant and Mr. Sandeep dey for Mr. Ayusha Kumar, learned
issued. This Tribunal has set aside the very show cause notice
10. In his reply the applicant did not address this issue at all.
reads as under:-
National Capital day in and day out. In the show cause notice,
on the strength of the fake licence but also has subjected the
Lg/ankit