2018 Rubric Presentation
2018 Rubric Presentation
2018 Rubric Presentation
Total
Category Scoring Criteria Points Score
The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and 5
audience.
Organization
Information is presented in a logical sequence. 5
(15 points)
Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references. 5
Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and 5
establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation.
Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for 5
the target audience.
Content
Presentation contains accurate information. 10
(45 points)
Material included is relevant to the overall message/purpose. 10
Appropriate amount of material is prepared, and points made 10
reflect well their relative importance.
There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the presentation. 5
Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is 5
appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, moving around, etc.).
Speaker uses a clear, audible voice. 5
Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth. 5
Presentation
(40 points) Good language skills and pronunciation are used. 5
Visual aids are well prepared, informative, effective, and not 5
distracting.
Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits. 5
Information was well communicated. 10
Score Total Points 100
Scoring Rubric for Oral Presentations: Example #2
Body:
○ Presenter has a scientifically valid argument.
○ Addresses audience at an appropriate level (rigorous, but generally understandable to a scientifically-
minded group).
○ Offers evidence of proof/disproof.
○ Describes methodology.
○ The talk is logical.
Conclusion:
○ Summarizes major points of talk.
○ Summarizes potential weaknesses (if any) in findings.
○ Provides you with a “take-home” message.
General Comments
Scoring Rubric for Project work Presentations
Delivery 5 4 3 2 1 0
- Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is
appropriately animated
- Speaker uses a clear, audible voice.
- Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth.
- Good language skills and pronunciation are used.
- Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits.
Content/Organization 5 4 3 2 1 0
-pertinence
-depth of commentary
-spoken, not read
-clear objectives
-logical structure
-able to answer questions
VISUAL AIDS 5 4 3 2 1 0
-transparencies, slides
-handouts
-audio, video, etc.
- Visual aids are well prepared, informative, effective, and not
distracting.
OVERALL IMPRESSION 5 4 3 2 1 0
-very interesting / very boring
-pleasant / unpleasant to listen to
-very good / poor communication
Poor Excellent
PRESENTATION SKILLS 1 2 3 4 5
Were the main ideas presented in an orderly and clear manner?..................................
Did the presentation fill the time allotted? ...................................................................
Were the overheads/handouts appropriate and helpful to the audience? .....................
Did the talk maintain the interest of the audience? ......................................................
Was there a theme or take-home message to the presentation? ...................................
Was the presenter responsive to audience questions? ..................................................
KNOWLEDGE BASE
Was proper background information on the topic given? ............................................
Was the material selected for presentation appropriate to the topic? ..........................
Was enough essential information given to allow the audience to effectively ............
evaluate the topic?
Was irrelevant or filler information excluded? ............................................................
Did the presenter have a clear understanding of the material presented? ....................
CRITICL THINKING
Were the main issues in this area clearly identified? ...................................................
Were both theoretical positions and empirical evidence presented? ...........................
Were the strengths and weaknesses of these theories, and the methods used to .........
gather this evidence adequately explained?
Did the presenter make recommendations for further work in this area? ....................
Did the main conclusions of the presentation follow from the material presented? ....
Were competing explanations or theories considered and dealt with properly? .........
COMMENTS