QQQ QQQQQQ
QQQ QQQQQQ
QQQ QQQQQQ
Show more
Share Cite
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.11.039
Get rights and content
Abstract
We report here the characterization of five biomass samples (Impereta cylindrica, Eragrostis airoides, Typha angustifolia
L., Arundinella khasiana Nees ex Steud, and Echinochloa stagnina (Retz.) P. Beauv) based on the proximate, ultimate and
compositional analysis. The biomasses were examined physico-chemically and characterized to understand their
compositional and structural properties. The moisture content was found to be highest in Typha angustifolia (13.951%)
and lowest in Eragrostis airoides (8.275%). Ash content was seen to be maximum in Arundinella khasiana (8.12%) and
minimum in Eragrostis airoides (3.660%). Derivative Thermogravimetric (DTG) peak was observed below 120 °C
indicating the loss of water molecules from the biomass. Cellulose degradation occured between 350 °C to 500 °C. The
maximum carbon content was visible in Typha angustifolia (52.895%) and minimum in Eragrostis airoides (41.024%). The
FTIR spectra showed a range of peaks such as 3450 cm−1, 2860 cm−1, 1668 cm−1, 1175 cm−1, 1097 cm−1, 7872 cm−1,
625 cm−1, 554 cm−1 etc. The cellulose content was found maximum in Eragrostis airoides (43.17%) and minimum in
Echinochloa stagnina (24.90%). The results demonstrate that the collected lignocellulosic biomass could be potential
candidate for bioethanol production.
Introduction
Currently climate change and diminishing oil supplies are key issues for most countries in the world. The available data
shows that the global consumption of petroleum based fuel was 85.7 million barrels per day (BPD) in 2008, which is
estimated to increase to 97.6 million (BPD) in 2020 and 112.2 million (BPD) by 2035 [1]. The imbalance between the
increased demand and shortage for energy will be a global challenge in near future [2]. In this scenario, bioethanol is
considered to partly replace the fossil-derived fuels [2]. In developing countries, the use of lignocellulosic biomass
(LCB) could significantly increase the bioethanol production and seems to be a promising candidate for the future
bioenergy needs.
Lignocellulosic biomass includes agricultural residues, energy crops, grasses, wood residues, forest residues and
municipal paper waste. Most of the lignocellulosic biomass is composed of 35–55% cellulose, 20–40% hemicellulose,
and 10–25% lignin. The lignocellulosic biomass vary in composition [31] depending on the type of biomass, locality,
climatic conditions and the soil where it grows. The sugar (pentose and hexose) composition in the biomass decides the
theoretical ethanol yield. It is the interaction between all these parameters that enables the biomass to be considered
as economically efficient energy resources. The qualitative and quantitative characterization of biomass components
are necessary from its application perspectives. This could be achieved only when a fundamental characterization of
biomass is done prior to microbial fermentation [3]. Hence, systematic characterization of biomass is indispensable in
biofuel production.
The use of LCB as feedstock for biofuel production will decrease the harmful effects caused by emission of CO2 gasses
associated with traditional fuels. Biomass derived fuels do not contribute to increase of CO2 in the atmosphere as the
amount released upon burning of such fuels do not exceed that fixed during photosynthesis. Therefore, the net
production of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere is balanced, and this makes it a remarkable bioenergy source in the
present context of environmental pollution caused by greenhouse gasses [4].
The physical characteristics of biomass are determined by proximate analysis which gives an estimate of moisture,
volatile matter, ash, fixed carbon, total solid, calorific value, decomposition temperature by thermogravimetric analysis
(TGA) and crystallinity by X-ray diffraction (XRD) study. These parameters affect the combustion behavior of the fuel
[16]. On the other hand, chemical analysis of biomass samples consists of ultimate analysis, which gives information
about the elemental composition. Usually, the major elemental components such as carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen
and trace amount of sulphur are analyzed in a biomass sample.
The North-Eastern region of India is ecologically enriched with innumerable unexplored microbes, plant and animal
species. The region is one of the well-known global biodiversity hotspots of India which comes under the Indo-Burma
(Myanmar) and Himalayan Biodiversity regions. The region which is home to various native species of plants and
animals have plenty of lignocellulosic biomass, which grows at high terrain regions. These biomasses remains un-
explored for bioethanol production. Here an attempt is made to explore such new feedstock for biofuel production. The
collection of species was done randomly by considering the abundance in a locality.
In brief, we have collected Impereta cylindrica, Eragrostis airoides, Typha angustifolia L., Arundinella khasiana Nees ex
Steud and Echinochloa stagnina (Retz.) P. Beauv. and characterized the lignocellulosic biomass with proximate, ultimate
and compositional analysis to know their potential for bioethanol production.
Section snippets
In this experimental study, the biomasses were collected from two states (Assam and Manipur) of North-Eastern India.
The latitude and longitude of the collection sites were recorded. Photographs were taken for each biomass sample. The
amount of feedstock collected was between 3 and 5 kg in weight. The visible sand, soil, and other contaminants were
removed manually. The experimental data presented are the average of three readings. The general outline of the
experimental methods is given in …
The five biomass species collected for the study were identified as Impereta cylindrica, Eragrostis airoides, Typha
angustifolia L., Arundinella khasiana Nees ex Steud, and Echinochloa stagnina (Retz.) P. Beauv. The systematic
classification of the selected biomass along with their respective site of collection is given in Table 1.…
Discussion
REVIEW
published: 08 February 2021
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.602364