#125 BS en Iso 14064 2 2019
#125 BS en Iso 14064 2 2019
#125 BS en Iso 14064 2 2019
Greenhouse gases
National foreword
This British Standard is the UK implementation of EN ISO 14064‑2:2019.
It supersedes BS EN ISO 14064‑2:2012, which is withdrawn.
The UK participation in its preparation was entrusted to Technical
Committee SES/1/7, Greenhouse gas management and related activities.
A list of organizations represented on this committee can be obtained on
request to its secretary.
This publication does not purport to include all the necessary provisions
of a contract. Users are responsible for its correct application.
© The British Standards Institution 2019
Published by BSI Standards Limited 2019
ISBN 978 0 580 91034 0
ICS 13.020.40
Compliance with a British Standard cannot confer immunity from
legal obligations.
This British Standard was published under the authority of the
Standards Policy and Strategy Committee on 31 May 2019.
English Version
CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this
European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references
concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN
member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by
translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management
Centre has the same status as the official versions.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
Turkey and United Kingdom.
© 2019 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. EN ISO 14064-2:2019 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
BS EN ISO 14064‑2:2019
EN ISO 14064-2:2019 (E)
European foreword
This document (EN ISO 14064-2:2019) has been prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 207
"Environmental management" in collaboration with CCMC.
This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an
identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by November 2019, and conflicting national standards
shall be withdrawn at the latest by November 2019.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
This document has been prepared under a mandate given to CEN by the European Commission and the
European Free Trade Association.
According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the
following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria,
Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,
France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta,
Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
Turkey and the United Kingdom.
Endorsement notice
The text of ISO 14064-2:2019 has been approved by CEN as EN ISO 14064-2:2019 without any
modification.
3
BS EN ISO 14064‑2:2019
ISO 14064-2:2019(E)
Contents Page
Foreword......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... iv
Introduction...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................v
1 Scope.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1
2 Normative references....................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
3 Terms and definitions...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
3.1 Terms relating to greenhouse gases...................................................................................................................................... 1
3.2 Terms relating to the GHG quantification process.................................................................................................... 3
3.3 Terms relating to organizations and interested parties....................................................................................... 4
3.4 Terms relating to verification and validation................................................................................................................ 5
4 Principles...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
4.1 General............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5
4.2 Relevance...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5
4.3 Completeness............................................................................................................................................................................................ 6
4.4 Consistency................................................................................................................................................................................................. 6
4.5 Accuracy......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6
4.6 Transparency............................................................................................................................................................................................. 6
4.7 Conservativeness................................................................................................................................................................................... 6
5 Introduction to GHG projects................................................................................................................................................................... 6
6 Requirements for GHG projects............................................................................................................................................................. 8
6.1 General requirements........................................................................................................................................................................ 8
6.2 Describing the project....................................................................................................................................................................... 9
6.3 Identifying GHG SSRs relevant to the project............................................................................................................. 10
6.4 Determining the GHG baseline................................................................................................................................................ 10
6.5 Identifying GHG SSRs relevant to the baseline scenario................................................................................... 11
6.6 Selecting GHG SSRs for monitoring or estimating GHG emissions and removals....................... 11
6.7 Quantifying GHG emissions and/or removals........................................................................................................... 11
6.8 Quantifying GHG emission reductions and removal enhancements...................................................... 12
6.9 Managing data quality.................................................................................................................................................................... 12
6.10 Monitoring the GHG project....................................................................................................................................................... 12
6.11 Documenting the GHG project................................................................................................................................................. 13
6.12 Verification and/or validation of the GHG project................................................................................................. 13
6.13 Reporting the GHG project.......................................................................................................................................................... 13
Annex A (informative) Guidance on the use of this document................................................................................................15
Bibliography.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 26
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO’s adherence to the
World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see www.iso
.org/iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 207, Environmental management,
Subcommittee SC 7, Greenhouse gas management and related activities.
This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 14064-2:2006), which has been
technically revised. The main changes compared with the previous edition are as follows:
— the concept of additionality and the baseline scenario have been changed;
— text related to the Kyoto mechanism has been deleted.
A list of all parts in the ISO 14064 series can be found on the ISO website.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html.
Introduction
0.1 Background
Climate change arising from anthropogenic activity has been identified as one of the greatest challenges
facing the world and will continue to affect business and citizens over future decades.
Climate change has implications for both human and natural systems and could lead to significant
impacts on resource availability, economic activity and human wellbeing. In response, international,
regional, national and local initiatives are being developed and implemented by public and private
sectors to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations in the Earth’s atmosphere as well as to
facilitate adaptation to climate change.
There is a need for an effective and progressive response to the urgent threat of climate change
on the basis of the best available scientific knowledge. ISO produces documents that support the
transformation of scientific knowledge into tools that will help address climate change.
GHG initiatives on mitigation rely on the quantification, monitoring, reporting and verification of GHG
emissions and/or removals.
The ISO 14060 family of standards provides clarity and consistency for quantifying, monitoring,
reporting and validating or verifying GHG emissions and removals to support sustainable development
through low-carbon economy and to benefit organizations, project proponents and interested parties
worldwide. Specifically, the use of the ISO 14060 family of standards:
— enhances the environmental integrity of GHG quantification;
— enhances the credibility, consistency and transparency of GHG quantification, monitoring, reporting,
verification and validation;
— facilitates the development and implementation of GHG management strategies and plans;
— facilitates the development and implementation of mitigation actions through emission reductions
or removal enhancements;
— facilitates the ability to track performance and progress in the reduction of GHG emissions and/or
increase in GHG removals.
Applications of the ISO 14060 family of standards include:
— corporate decisions, such as identifying emission reduction opportunities and increasing
profitability by reducing energy consumption;
— carbon risk management, such as the identification and management of risks and opportunities;
— voluntary initiatives, such as participation in voluntary GHG registries or sustainability reporting
initiatives;
— GHG markets, such as the buying and selling of GHG allowances or credits;
— regulatory/government GHG programmes, such as credit for early action, agreements or national
and local reporting initiatives.
ISO 14064-1 details principles and requirements for designing, developing, managing and reporting
organization-level GHG inventories.
It includes requirements for determining GHG emission and removal boundaries, quantifying an
organization’s GHG emissions and removals, and identifying specific company actions or activities
aimed at improving GHG management.
It also includes requirements and guidance on inventory quality management, reporting, internal
auditing and the organization’s responsibilities in verification activities.
This document details principles and requirements for determining baselines, and monitoring,
quantifying and reporting of project emissions. It focuses on GHG projects or project-based activities
specifically designed to reduce GHG emissions and/or enhance GHG removals. It provides the basis for
GHG projects to be verified and validated.
ISO 14064-3 details requirements for verifying GHG statements related to GHG inventories, GHG projects,
and carbon footprints of products. It describes the process for verification or validation, including
verification or validation planning, assessment procedures, and the evaluation of organizational,
project and product GHG statements.
ISO 14065 defines requirements for bodies that validate and verify GHG statements. Its requirements
cover impartiality, competence, communication, validation and verification processes, appeals,
complaints, and the management system of validation and verification bodies. It can be used as a
basis for accreditation and other forms of recognition in relation to the impartiality, competence, and
consistency of validation and verification bodies.
ISO 14066 specifies competence requirements for validation teams and verification teams. It includes
principles and specifies competence requirements based on the tasks that validation teams or
verification teams have to be able to perform.
ISO 14067 defines the principles, requirements and guidelines for the quantification of carbon footprint
of products. The aim of ISO 14067 is to quantify GHG emissions associated with the life cycle stages of
a product, beginning with resource extraction and raw material sourcing and extending through the
production, use and end-of-life stages of the product.
ISO/TR 14069 assists users in the application of ISO 14064-1, providing guidelines and examples for
improving transparency in the quantification of emissions and their reporting. It does not provide
additional guidance to ISO 14064-1.
Figure 1 illustrates the relationship among the ISO 14060 family of GHG standards.
and/or removal enhancements are calculated by comparison of the GHG project emissions/removals
with the baseline scenario emissions/removals. It is important to demonstrate that the GHG baseline
is consistent with the principles of this document, including conservativeness and accuracy, in order
to increase the level of confidence that GHG emission reductions and/or removal enhancements are
credible and not over-estimated. Generally, the GHG baseline could be determined based on historical
information or setting of alternative scenarios according to the requirements of the intended user/
programme. For both the project emissions and the baseline scenario, the quantification, monitoring
and reporting of GHG emissions and removals are based on procedures developed by the project
proponent or adopted from a GHG programme.
This document does not use the term “project boundary”. In order to be compatible with the broadest
range of GHG programmes, project boundary is referred to as SSR that are relevant to the project. If any
GHG programme requires a specific time period or methodology, these can be compared to the GHG
baseline and estimated project emissions. Any discrepancies are recorded and reported in the GHG report.
This document does not specify requirements for verification/validation bodies or verifiers/validators
in providing assurance against GHG statements or claims by GHG projects. Such requirements may
be specified by the authority of the applicable GHG programme or can be found in ISO 14064-3. The
process to recognize certified GHG emission reductions or removal enhancements as GHG units, credits
or offsets is an extension of the GHG project cycle. The certification and crediting process, which may be
under the authority of a GHG programme and may vary among GHG programmes, is also not included in
the specifications of this document.
Annex A provides guidance on the use of this document.
0.3 Significance of the terms “explain” and “justify” in this document
Some clauses require users of this document to explain and justify the use of certain approaches or
decisions taken.
Explanation generally includes:
a) how approaches were used or decisions taken;
b) why approaches were chosen or decisions made.
Justification has two more criteria:
c) explain why alternative approaches were not chosen;
d) provide supporting data or analysis.
Greenhouse gases —
Part 2:
Specification with guidance at the project level for
quantification, monitoring and reporting of greenhouse
gas emission reductions or removal enhancements
1 Scope
This document specifies principles and requirements and provides guidance at the project level for the
quantification, monitoring and reporting of activities intended to cause greenhouse gas (GHG) emission
reductions or removal enhancements. It includes requirements for planning a GHG project, identifying
and selecting GHG sources, sinks and reservoirs (SSRs) relevant to the project and baseline scenario,
monitoring, quantifying, documenting and reporting GHG project performance and managing data
quality.
The ISO 14060 family of standards is GHG programme neutral. If a GHG programme is applicable, the
requirements of that GHG programme are additional to the requirements of the ISO 14060 family of
standards.
2 Normative references
There are no normative references in this document.
Note 2 to entry: Other examples of GHGs are provided in the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) Assessment Report[11].
3.1.2
greenhouse gas source
GHG source
process that releases a GHG (3.1.1) into the atmosphere
3.1.3
greenhouse gas sink
GHG sink
process that removes a GHG (3.1.1) from the atmosphere
3.1.4
greenhouse gas reservoir
GHG reservoir
component, other than the atmosphere, that has the capacity to accumulate GHGs (3.1.1), and to store
and release them
3.1.5
greenhouse gas emission
GHG emission
release of a GHG (3.1.1) into the atmosphere
3.1.6
greenhouse gas removal
GHG removal
withdrawal of a GHG (3.1.1) from the atmosphere by GHG sinks (3.1.3)
3.1.7
greenhouse gas emission reduction
GHG emission reduction
quantified decrease in GHG emissions (3.1.5) between a baseline scenario (3.2.6) and the GHG project (3.2.3)
3.1.8
greenhouse gas removal enhancement
GHG removal enhancement
quantified increase in GHG removals (3.1.6) between a baseline scenario (3.2.6) and the GHG project (3.2.3)
3.1.9
greenhouse gas emission factor
GHG emission factor
coefficient relating GHG activity data with the GHG emission (3.1.5)
3.1.10
greenhouse gas removal factor
GHG removal factor
coefficient relating GHG activity data with the GHG removal (3.1.6)
3.1.11
affected greenhouse gas source, sink and reservoir
affected GHG SSR
GHG source (3.1.2), GHG sink (3.1.3) and GHG reservoir (3.1.4) influenced by a GHG project (3.2.3),
through changes in market demand or supply for associated products or services, or through physical
displacement
Note 1 to entry: An affected GHG SSR is generally off the project site.
Note 2 to entry: GHG emission reductions (3.1.7) or GHG removal enhancements (3.1.8) offset by affected GHG SSRs
are often referred to as leakage.
3.1.12
controlled greenhouse gas source, sink and reservoir
controlled GHG SSR
GHG source (3.1.2), GHG sink (3.1.3) and GHG reservoir (3.1.4) where the operation is under the direction
and influence of the GHG project proponent (3.3.2) through financial, policy, management or other
instruments
Note 1 to entry: A controlled GHG SSR is generally on the GHG project site.
3.1.13
related greenhouse gas source, sink and reservoir
related GHG SSR
GHG source (3.1.2), GHG sink (3.1.3) and GHG reservoir (3.1.4) that has material or energy flows into, out
of, or within the GHG project (3.2.3)
Note 1 to entry: A related GHG SSR is generally upstream or downstream from the GHG project, and can be either
on or off the GHG project site.
Note 2 to entry: A related GHG SSR also can include activities related to design, construction and decommissioning
of a GHG project.
3.1.14
global warming potential
GWP
index, based on radiative properties of GHGs (3.1.1), measuring the radiative forcing following a pulse
emission of a unit mass of a given GHG in the present-day atmosphere integrated over a chosen time
horizon, relative to that of carbon dioxide (CO2)
Note 1 to entry: A list of GHGs with their recognized GWPs is provided in the latest Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Report[11].
3.1.15
carbon dioxide equivalent
CO2e
unit for comparing the radiative forcing of a GHG (3.1.1) to that of carbon dioxide
Note 2 to entry: The GHG statement provided by the responsible party should be clearly identifiable, capable of
consistent evaluation or measurement against suitable criteria by a verifier (3.4.4) or validator (3.4.5).
Note 3 to entry: The GHG statement could be provided in a GHG report (3.2.4), GHG project (3.2.3) plan or CFP
study report. "CFP study report" is defined in ISO 14067:2018, 3.1.1.5.
3.2.2
greenhouse gas information system
GHG information system
policies, processes and procedures to establish, manage, maintain and record GHG (3.1.1) information
Note 1 to entry: Maintain includes the amendment, removal and addition of GHG information.
3.2.3
greenhouse gas project
GHG project
activity or activities that alter the conditions of a GHG baseline (3.2.5) and which cause GHG emission
reductions (3.1.7) or GHG removal enhancements (3.1.8)
Note 1 to entry: Activity can include technologies used to alter the conditions of the GHG baseline.
3.2.4
greenhouse gas report
GHG report
standalone document intended to communicate an organization’s or GHG project’s (3.2.3) GHG-related
information to its intended users (3.3.1)
Note 1 to entry: A GHG report can include a GHG statement (3.2.1).
3.2.5
greenhouse gas baseline
GHG baseline
quantitative reference(s) of GHG emissions (3.1.5) and/or GHG removals (3.1.6) that would have occurred
in the absence of a GHG project (3.2.3) and provides the baseline scenario (3.2.6) for comparison with
project GHG emissions and/or GHG removals
3.2.6
baseline scenario
hypothetical reference case that best represents the conditions most likely to occur in the absence of a
proposed GHG project (3.2.3)
3.2.7
monitoring
continuous or periodic assessment of GHG emissions (3.1.5), GHG removals (3.1.6) or other GHG-
related data
3.2.8
uncertainty
parameter associated with the result of quantification that characterizes the dispersion of the values
that could be reasonably attributed to the quantified amount
Note 1 to entry: Uncertainty information typically specifies quantitative estimates of the likely dispersion of values
and a qualitative description of the likely causes of the dispersion and can be included in a greenhouse gas report.
3.3.2
greenhouse gas project proponent
GHG project proponent
individual or organization that has overall control and responsibility for a GHG project (3.2.3)
Note 1 to entry: The term “project proponent" is also used synonymously in the text.
3.3.3
interested party
person or organization that can affect, be affected by, or perceive itself to be affected by a decision or
activity
EXAMPLE Person or organization that is affected by or interested in the development or implementation of a
GHG project (3.2.3).
3.3.4
greenhouse gas programme
GHG programme
voluntary or mandatory international, national or subnational system or scheme that registers,
accounts or manages GHG emissions (3.1.5), GHG removals (3.1.6), GHG emission reductions (3.1.7) or GHG
removal enhancements (3.1.8) outside the organization or GHG project (3.2.3)
3.4.2
verification
process for evaluating a statement of historical data and information to determine if the statement is
materially correct and conforms to criteria
3.4.3
validation
process for evaluating the reasonableness of the assumptions, limitations and methods that support a
statement about the outcome of future activities
3.4.4
verifier
competent and impartial person with responsibility for performing and reporting on a verification (3.4.2)
3.4.5
validator
competent and impartial person with responsibility for performing and reporting on a validation (3.4.3)
4 Principles
4.1 General
The application of principles is fundamental to ensure that GHG-related information is a true and fair
account. The principles are the basis for, and will guide the application of, the requirements in this
document.
4.2 Relevance
Select the GHG SSRs, data and methodologies appropriate to the needs of the intended user.
4.3 Completeness
Include all relevant GHG emissions and removals. Include all relevant information to support criteria
and procedures.
4.4 Consistency
Enable meaningful comparisons in GHG-related information.
4.5 Accuracy
Reduce bias and uncertainties as far as is practical.
4.6 Transparency
Disclose sufficient and appropriate GHG-related information to allow intended users to make decisions
with reasonable confidence.
4.7 Conservativeness
Use conservative assumptions, values and procedures to ensure that GHG emission reductions or
removal enhancements are not over-estimated.
NOTE Not all GHG project/programmes will require all the elements included in this figure.
The GHG project proponent may initially identify the project concept, design the project and evaluate
its feasibility, consult interested parties and assess GHG programme eligibility requirements. As
appropriate, the project proponent may seek written approval of project acceptance by the applicable
GHG programme or responsible government institution.
For the planning phase, this document specifies requirements for establishing and documenting a GHG
project. In planning the GHG project, the project proponent:
— describes the project;
— identifies and selects GHG SSRs relevant for the project;
— determines the baseline scenario and identifies and selects GHG SSRs relevant to it;
— develops procedures to quantify, monitor and report GHG emissions, removals, emission reductions
and removal enhancements.
NOTE GHG programmes can require official registration, validation and public distribution of a GHG project
plan before project implementation.
For the implementation phase, this document specifies requirements for selecting and applying criteria
and procedures for:
— regular data quality management;
— monitoring;
— quantification and reporting of GHG emissions and removals in the project and GHG baseline;
proponent shall select and apply established criteria and procedures from a recognized origin, if
available.
In cases where the project proponent uses criteria and procedures or relevant current good practice
guidance that derive from a recognized origin, the project proponent shall document and justify any
departure from those criteria and procedures.
In cases where criteria and procedures or relevant current good practice guidance from more than
one recognized origin exists, the project proponent shall justify the reason for using the selected
recognized origin.
Where there is no relevant criteria, procedures or current good practice guidance from a recognized
origin, the project proponent shall establish, justify and apply criteria and procedures to fulfil the
requirements in this document.
If the project proponent subscribes to a GHG programme, the project proponent shall ensure that the
GHG project conforms to the requirements of the GHG programme.
NOTE Good practice guidance can come from a recognized origin, such as industry practices and
associations, similar projects, benchmarking, GHG programme methods or others that are fit for purpose.
4) frequency of monitoring and reporting and the project period, including relevant project
activities in each step of the GHG project cycle, as applicable;
5) frequency of verification and validation, as applicable.
NOTE These parameters can be specified by a GHG programme.
l) if applicable, required information relevant for the eligibility of a GHG project under a GHG
programme, including legislative, technical, economic, sectoral, social, environmental, geographic,
site-specific and temporal information;
In order for a project to be eligible for a GHG programme, the proponent shall adhere to all eligibility
requirements of the GHG programme or intended user.
When adding new activities or changes to an existing project, the proponent shall review and update, as
necessary, the GHG baseline(s) and the project emissions and removals affected by the new activities or
changes, including the requirements of the GHG programme or intended user, as applicable.
If the project was validated (see 6.12), the proponent shall explain how the new activities or changes
remain consistent with the validated GHG baseline. If the changes are not consistent with the validated
GHG baseline, the project proponent shall have the project re-validated.
The justification of the GHG baseline should take into account likely future behaviour of the baseline
scenario (GHG SSRs) to meet the conservativeness principle (4.7).
NOTE There are different ways of determining a GHG baseline, including based on past and current data. A
GHG programme can prescribe other approaches to determine the GHG baseline, such as a performance standard
(e.g. benchmark or multi-project) baseline. A GHG baseline can be static (remain the same during the project
period) or dynamic (change over time during the project period).
In developing the GHG baseline, the project proponent shall select and justify the assumptions, values
and procedures that ensure GHG emissions reductions or removal enhancements are not over-
estimated.
The project proponent shall select or establish, justify and apply criteria and procedures for
demonstrating that the project results in GHG emissions reductions or removal enhancements that are
additional to what would occur in comparison to the determined GHG baseline.
A.3.4 provides guidance on determining the GHG baseline.
6.6 Selecting GHG SSRs for monitoring or estimating GHG emissions and removals
The project proponent shall select or establish criteria and procedures for selecting GHG SSRs for either
regular monitoring or estimation based on appropriate and reliable data.
The project proponent shall provide justification for not selecting any GHG SSR identified in the GHG
baseline for regular monitoring.
NOTE Figure A.3 shows a possible framework for identifying and selecting GHG SSRs for regular monitoring
or estimating GHG emissions or removals.
i) GHG information management systems, including the location and retention of stored data and data
management that includes a procedure for transfers of data between different forms of systems or
documentation.
Where measurement and monitoring equipment is used, the project proponent shall ensure that
calibrated or verified monitoring and measurement equipment is used and maintained, as appropriate.
The project proponent shall apply GHG monitoring criteria and procedures in accordance with the
monitoring plan.
All data and information related to the monitoring of the GHG project should be recorded and
documented.
7) a statement of the aggregate GHG emissions and/or removals by GHG SSRs for the GHG baseline,
stated in units of CO2e, e.g. tonnes of CO2e, for the relevant time period;
8) a description of the GHG baseline and demonstration that the GHG emission reductions or
removal enhancements are not over-estimated;
9) a general description of the criteria, procedures or good practice guidance used as a basis for
the calculation of project GHG emission reductions and removal enhancements;
10) a statement on uncertainty, how it affects the GHG statement and how it has been addressed to
minimize misrepresentation;
11) the date of the report and the time period covered;
12) as applicable, an assessment of permanence;
13) an evidence of the appointment of the authorized representative on behalf of the project
proponent, if different from the proponent;
14) if applicable, the GHG programme(s) to which the GHG project subscribes;
15) if required by intended users, changes to the project or monitoring system from the project
plan and assessment of its conformity to criteria, applicability of methodologies and any other
requirements.
Annex A
(informative)
A.1 Background
This annex provides guidance on the use of this document. It does not describe in detail how to
implement the requirements.
This document is intended for use in undertaking and evaluating GHG projects during planning,
implementation or post-implementation phases.
In order to have broad and flexible application to different GHG project types and scales, this document
outlines principles and specifies process requirements rather than prescribing specific criteria
and procedures. Additional requirements, criteria and guidance from relevant GHG programmes,
good practice, legislation and standards are important for the credible application of this document.
Additional guidance, programme requirements and good practice will come from many sources, and
are continually evolving (see Figure A.1).
This document is GHG programme neutral but is designed for use with internal or external voluntary or
mandatory GHG programmes. Many GHG programmes are currently being carried out with reference
to this document. Some GHG programmes have additional requirements to meet their own purposes.
This document does not require the verification or validation of GHG projects directly, nor does it address
crediting from GHG projects. As a result, project proponents should consider additional guidance from
GHG programme requirements. When used in conjunction with specific GHG programmes, project
proponents, verifiers and validators should comply with any additional requirements.
Figure A.2 illustrates the use in ISO 14064 series of several definitions related to key carbon cycles,
such as:
— GHG source;
— GHG sink;
— GHG reservoir;
— GHG emission;
— GHG removal.
A.2 Principles
A.2.1 General
The principles in this document are intended to ensure a fair representation and a credible and
balanced account of GHG emission reductions and removal enhancements from projects. Principles are
used to assist in the general interpretation of requirements. In particular, the principles are intended to
apply when judgement and discretion are called for in fulfilling requirements. The principles form the
basis for justifications and explanations required in this document, and users should make reference
to the relevant principles and how they have been applied. The application of each principle will vary
according to the nature of the judgement involved. The principles should be applied holistically, with
each principle considered within the context of the overall intent of particular clauses. This document
includes principles common to ISO 14064-1 and unique to this document.
Figure A.2 — Interaction and application of several definitions related to key carbon cycles
used in the ISO 14064 series
A.2.2 Relevance
Relevance is important in the context of selection of:
— GHG SSRs of the GHG project and the baseline scenario;
— procedures to quantify, monitor and estimate GHG SSRs;
— potential baseline scenario(s).
Relevance is assessed against the influence on the decisions or conclusions of intended users of the
information and may be implemented by defining and justifying qualitative and/or quantitative criteria.
For example, minimum thresholds may be used to justify the aggregation of minor GHG sources or in the
choice of quantification methods or the number of data points monitored. Implementing the principle of
relevance can help reduce the cost of GHG projects. However, users of the information still require the
ability to make decisions with reasonable assurance as to the integrity of quantification and reporting.
A.2.3 Completeness
Completeness is usually satisfied by:
— identifying all GHG SSRs controlled, related to or affected by the GHG project and corresponding
baseline scenario;
— estimating GHG SSRs not regularly monitored;
— ensuring that all information relevant to intended users appears in reported GHG data or information
in a manner consistent with the established project and baseline scenario, time period and objectives
of reporting;
— determining representative baseline scenario within the relevant geographic areas and time
periods.
Where comparable individual GHG SSRs cannot be identified in the GHG baseline, appropriate default
values and assumptions are used. In the absence of such direct evidence, expert judgement is often
required to provide information and guidance in establishing and justifying elements of the GHG project
plan and GHG reports. This may include the appropriate use of models and conversion factors, as well
as an estimation of uncertainty. The same will also often apply to the GHG baseline estimations for GHG
removal projects.
A.2.4 Consistency
Consistency is usually satisfied by:
— using uniform procedures among projects;
— using uniform procedures to determine the GHG baseline and to quantify the project emissions;
— using functionally equivalent units (i.e. the same level of service is provided by the GHG baseline
and the project);
— applying tests and assumptions equally across potential baseline scenario(s);
— ensuring the equivalent application of expert judgement, internally and externally, over time and
among projects.
The principle of consistency is not intended to prevent the use of procedures or methodologies that
enhance the accuracy of GHG data and information. However, any change in procedures and methods
should be transparently documented and justified.
A.2.5 Accuracy
Accuracy is usually satisfied by avoiding or eliminating bias from sources within estimations, and
through describing and improving precision and uncertainties as far as is practical.
Project proponents should pursue accuracy insofar as possible, considering the hypothetical nature of
baseline scenario and the cost of monitoring of some types of GHG emissions and removals. Where the
hypothetical nature and high cost make accuracy difficult, conservativeness serves as a moderator to
accuracy in order to maintain the credibility of project GHG quantification.
Accuracy and conservativeness are interrelated principles. Once a project proponent has reduced
uncertainty to the extent practicable, the value chosen within that range should result in a conservative
estimate of the GHG emission or removal.
A.2.6 Transparency
Transparency relates to the degree to which information is seen as being reported in an open, clear,
factual, neutral and coherent manner based on documentation (e.g. an audit trail). Information is
recorded, compiled and analysed in such a way that will enable internal reviewers and external
intended users to attest to its credibility.
Transparency usually requires the following:
— clearly and explicitly stating and documenting all assumptions;
— clearly referencing background material;
— stating all calculations and methods;
— clearly identifying all changes in documentation;
— compiling and documenting information in a manner that enables independent verification and
validation;
— documenting the application of principles [e.g. in selecting the baseline scenario(s)];
— documenting the explanation and/or justification (e.g. choice of procedures, methods, parameters,
data sources, key factors);
— documenting the justification of selected criteria;
— documenting assumptions, references and methods such that another party can reproduce
reported data;
— documenting any external factors to the project that may affect the decisions of intended users.
A.2.7 Conservativeness
Conservativeness is usually satisfied by:
— the appropriate choice of the path of technological development and the rate of implementation in
the relevant geographic area and time periods in the absence of the project;
— taking into account the impact of the project on the path of development and rate of implementation
in the relevant geographic area and time periods;
— the appropriate choice of parameters affecting the project’s GHG emissions, removals and SSRs;
— providing reliable results maintained over a range of probable assumptions.
The principle of conservativeness is applied when highly uncertain parameters or data sources are
relied upon for the determination and the quantification of the GHG baseline, and for project GHG
emissions and removals. In particular, the conservativeness of the GHG baseline is established with
reference to the choice of approaches, assumptions, methods, parameters, data sources and key factors
so that GHG baseline emissions and removals are more likely to be under-estimated rather than over-
estimated, and that reliable results are maintained over a range of probable assumptions. However,
using the conservativeness principle does not always imply the use of the most conservative choice
of assumptions or methods. Explanations of how assumptions and choices are conservative should be
provided in project documentation. The implementation of the conservativeness principle is frequently
a matter of balance (e.g. between accuracy, relevance and cost-effectiveness). When less accurate
methods are chosen, more conservative assumptions and methods should be applied.
A.3.2.1 General
The project proponent is expected to identify all relevant GHG sources and sinks controlled by the
project, as well as those related to or affected by the project. However, the quantification of GHG
emissions and removals by the GHG project generally does not involve all of the GHG sources and sinks
identified. Therefore, criteria to identify and select GHG sources and sinks relevant to, but not impacted
by, the project proponent are necessary.
To ensure an appropriate comparison of the project and baseline scenario (to calculate GHG emission
reductions and removal enhancements), the services, products or function generally include a
quantitative measure for the emissions, and demonstrate functional equivalence.
The project proponent is also accountable for changes in GHG emissions and removals by GHG sources
and sinks affected by the project through activity shifting or market transformation, often referred to
as leakage. For example, a project that increases energy efficiency can also reduce energy prices and
result in an increase in energy demand (i.e. “rebound effect”).
Figure A.3 illustrates an example of a decision tree that provides a procedure to assist project
proponents to consider GHG SSRs to fulfil, and document conformity with, some of the requirements
of this document. This framework may be used to identify and select GHG SSRs for quantification
by means of direct measurement or estimation approaches. The criteria used in the procedure by
the project proponent should be consistent with the GHG project principles, good practice guidance,
policies and rules of applicable GHG programmes, as applicable. The project proponent should justify
the choice of criteria used in the procedure, as well as the procedure being used (whether the following
example is used or another approach is used). For example, the criteria may consider a balance between
practicality and cost-effectiveness with the GHG project principles. The project proponent should also
consider good practice guidance for how to answer some of the decision criteria (e.g. when considering
if a GHG SSR is related by flows into or out of the project or baseline scenario). In such cases, the project
proponent may consider good practice guidance that provides established approaches related to the
level of aggregation to represent SSRs (e.g. each boiler or the entire heating plant as the level of detail),
the criteria used (e.g. mass fraction or material input, such as a co-solvent or catalyst represents more
than 5 % of inputs on a mass basis) or percentage of costs (e.g. a product/output represents 10 % of
project value and therefore should be considered). Ultimately, the decision whether or not to monitor
or estimate a SSR directly may be based on the monitoring effort (costs) versus the significance of the
impact on GHG reductions.
Exclusion of GHG sources from quantification may also be justified when comparisons of the project
and baseline scenario sources show no change from the baseline scenario to the project. In the case of
GHG removal enhancement projects, a GHG source and/or sink may be excluded from quantification
requirements if the project proponent can demonstrate that the GHG source and/or sink is not a net
source of GHG emissions/removals over the project period.
This document does not use the term “project boundary”. Instead, it refers to SSRs that are relevant to
the project. Relevant SSRs include those that are controlled by the project proponent, those related to
the project by material or energy flows, and those affected by the project. The choice of terminology in
these cases is intended to make this document neutral and compatible among a range of programmes
by avoiding programme-specific definitions and requirements.
GHG programmes. However, the concept of additionality is inherent to the GHG baseline determination
to ensure that GHG emission reductions or removal enhancements generated by the project go beyond
what would have happened in the absence of the project.
A.3.4.1 General
The GHG baseline is a quantitative reference of emissions and/or removals that would have occurred in
the absence of a project that provides the basis for comparison with project emissions and/or removals.
During project planning, the project proponent is advised to consider all potential baseline scenarios,
including the proposed project as a potential baseline scenario. If the project is equivalent to the
appropriate baseline scenario, there is a risk of no GHG emission reduction or removal enhancement,
and the proposed project may not become a valid GHG project.
The predictive quality of quantifying many baseline scenarios, where there is the risk of over-
estimating GHG emissions, requires a different approach. Consideration should be given to all feasible
baseline scenarios for GHG emissions, and the selected GHG baseline should be plausible over a range
of assumptions for the duration of the baseline scenario application. Usually a baseline methodology
is used to select the GHG baseline. A conservative GHG baseline is usually adopted among potential
baseline scenarios that are equivalent in terms of completeness, consistency, transparency and
relevance. Potential baseline scenarios should cover the same period of time as the project. The GHG
baseline period and reporting period should be long enough to ensure that the variability in operating
patterns are accounted for by the GHG baseline and project emissions performance indicators.
As an example, terrestrial GHG removal projects are likely to use only selected GHGs in the assessment
and determination of the GHG baseline. Only the sum of changes of carbon stocks in GHG reservoirs or
carbon pools are likely to be considered. Resulting GHG removal enhancements would then be the sum
of changes in carbon stocks in the GHG reservoirs or carbon pools less any increase in GHG emissions of
all GHGs by GHG sources.
Typically, there are several phases to quantifying a GHG project emission reduction or removal. The
first phase is determining the SSRs by gathering data relevant to the identified SSRs (see A.3.2) that
are controlled, related and affected. A GHG baseline time period should also be defined. This may be
defined by a GHG programme, as applicable. The time period selected for the GHG baseline is the same
time period as the project emission reductions or removal reporting period, thus achieving equivalence
and an accurate comparison under the same conditions.
The GHG baseline time period and reporting period should be long enough to ensure that the variability
in operating patterns are accounted for by the GHG baseline and project emissions performance
indicators. The SSRs affected by the project may include material and energy flows in and out of the
SSRs. The project proponent determines the scope and SSRs, i.e. limitations, of the project by evaluating
the SSRs and their associated emissions, control, physical limits and other criteria that will be included
in the project.
NOTE While determining the SSRs, the ability to isolate the SSRs is normally considered in order to minimize
uncertainty.
Baseline procedures or methodologies to estimate the GHG baseline are generally customized (i.e.
developed by the project proponent) or standardized (i.e. developed by the project proponent or
programme authority for specific project types).
Historical conditions (such as GHG emissions or activity level data), market conditions (such as common
technology usage) and best available technology (such as the top identified percentage of similar
activities) can also be the basis for the development of baseline methodologies. GHG baselines may be
static (constant with time) or dynamic (vary over time).
The GHG baseline is developed for the same time period as the reporting period and provides an
estimate of what will occur in the absence of the project. In order to account for relevant variables,
linear regression, polynomial equations or other proper mathematical formula can be used.
The quantification of the GHG baseline should be based upon the principles of relevance and accuracy. It
is good practice to use default emission factors as a starting point for more project-specific calculations
and to estimate also aggregated GHG emissions and removals of the GHG project into a common unit of
measure, i.e. CO2e.
If there is a GHG programme baseline scenario, the proponent records this baseline scenario and
compares it to the actual historical and current GHG baseline. Any discrepancies between the
programme GHG baseline (methodology) and calculated GHG baseline should be recorded for review by
the interested parties.
NOTE A GHG baseline can be determined for a specific GHG project or total emissions in an inventory, i.e.
base year.
A.3.5.1 General
The first step in the quantification of GHG emissions reduction and/or removal enhancement is
identification of the relevant GHGs for each SSR. These SSRs, normally, would have been identified at the
planning stage of the GHG project, as part of the identification of the GHG baseline and the estimation of
project emissions/removals.
Once the relevant SSRs have been identified, the next step for the project is to identify parameters
related to the respective SSRs that will be estimated or quantified based on actual measurements in
order to calculate the GHG baseline and project emissions. The data collected at the planning stage will
help in quantifying the GHG baseline data, and the data collected post-implementation of the project
will help in quantifying the project emissions. For projects that have a dynamic GHG baseline, e.g. based
on the actual production figures, it is good practice that the GHG baseline is calculated using some data
measured post-implementation of the GHG project.
A.3.5.2 Collecting GHG data and information related to GHG baseline and project emissions
The nature of the information available to the project proponent determines whether GHG emissions
or removals are estimated or quantified based on actual measurements. For example, before the
implementation of a project, in general, GHG emissions or removals are estimated, whereas during
project operation, GHG emissions or removals can be directly monitored and measured to provide
actual data for quantification. (The monitoring and measurement may be carried out at 100 % or be
based on a sampling plan depending upon the nature of the sources of data.)
Data could be gathered from multiple sources, such as current manufacturing processes, systems
that emit GHGs (direct emissions), energy consumption parameters in terms of fossil fuel consumed
and electricity consumed, etc., standard published data for the calculation of GHG emission factors,
transportation information (i.e. distance travelled) and fuel consumed.
The GHG emission reduction/enhancement of removals are measured as a difference of the baseline
scenario emissions/removals and project emissions/removals.
information public is necessary in order to obtain interested party comments for use in project
development and management. Project proponents may also use public reports for publicity purposes.
Bibliography
[1] ISO 5725-1:1994, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results — Part 1:
General principles and definitions
[2] ISO 9001, Quality management systems — Requirements
[3] ISO 14033, Environmental management — Quantitative environmental information -- Guidelines
and examples
[4] ISO 14040, Environmental management — Life cycle assessment — Principles and framework
[5] ISO 14064-1, Greenhouse gases — Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for
quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals
[6] ISO 14064-3, Greenhouse gases — Part 3: Specification with guidance for the verification and
validation of greenhouse gas statements
[7] ISO 14065, Greenhouse gases — Requirements for greenhouse gas validation and verification bodies
for use in accreditation or other forms of recognition
[8] ISO 14066, Greenhouse gases — Competence requirements for greenhouse gas validation teams and
verification teams
[9] ISO 14067, Greenhouse gases — Carbon footprint of products — Requirements and guidelines for
quantification
[10] ISO/TR 14069, Greenhouse gases — Quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions for
organizations — Guidance for the application of ISO 14064-1
[11] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Fifth Assessment Report: Climate
Change 2013 “The Physical Science Basis”, 2013. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/
[12] IPCC. Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry, 2003. Available
from: https://www.ipcc.ch/
[13] IPCC. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 2006, 5 volumes + corrigenda.
Available from: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html
[14] World Resources Institute (WRI) and World Business Council for Sustainable
Development. (WBCSD). The GHG Protocol for Project Accounting. WRI/WBCSD, Washington,
D.C., 2005. Available from: https://ghgprotocol.org/
Buying standards PLUS is an updating service exclusive to BSI Subscribing Members. You will
automatically receive the latest hard copy of your standards when they’re
You can buy and download PDF versions of BSI publications, including British revised or replaced.
and adopted European and international standards, through our website at
bsigroup.com/shop, where hard copies can also be purchased. To find out more about becoming a BSI Subscribing Member and the benefits
of membership, please visit bsigroup.com/shop.
If you need international and foreign standards from other Standards Development
Organizations, hard copies can be ordered from our Customer Services team. With a Multi-User Network Licence (MUNL) you are able to host standards
publications on your intranet. Licences can cover as few or as many users as you
Copyright in BSI publications wish. With updates supplied as soon as they’re available, you can be sure your
documentation is current. For further information, email [email protected].
All the content in BSI publications, including British Standards, is the property
of and copyrighted by BSI or some person or entity that owns copyright in the Revisions
information used (such as the international standardization bodies) and has
formally licensed such information to BSI for commercial publication and use. Our British Standards and other publications are updated by amendment or revision.
Save for the provisions below, you may not transfer, share or disseminate any We continually improve the quality of our products and services to benefit your
portion of the standard to any other person. You may not adapt, distribute, business. If you find an inaccuracy or ambiguity within a British Standard or other
commercially exploit, or publicly display the standard or any portion thereof in any BSI publication please inform the Knowledge Centre.
manner whatsoever without BSI’s prior written consent.
Useful Contacts
Storing and using standards Customer Services
Standards purchased in soft copy format: Tel: +44 345 086 9001
• A British Standard purchased in soft copy format is licensed to a sole named Email (orders): [email protected]
user for personal or internal company use only. Email (enquiries): [email protected]
• The standard may be stored on more than 1 device provided that it is accessible Subscriptions
by the sole named user only and that only 1 copy is accessed at any one time. Tel: +44 345 086 9001
• A single paper copy may be printed for personal or internal company use only. Email: [email protected]
• Standards purchased in hard copy format:
Knowledge Centre
• A British Standard purchased in hard copy format is for personal or internal Tel: +44 20 8996 7004
company use only.
Email: [email protected]
• It may not be further reproduced – in any format – to create an additional copy.
This includes scanning of the document. Copyright & Licensing
If you need more than 1 copy of the document, or if you wish to share the Tel: +44 20 8996 7070
document on an internal network, you can save money by choosing a subscription Email: [email protected]
product (see ‘Subscriptions’).
BSI Group Headquarters
389 Chiswick High Road London W4 4AL UK