Questions On Contract Law
Questions On Contract Law
Questions On Contract Law
(b). Explain how you would decide the case giving reasons for your decision and
supporting the same with decided cases. (15 Marks)
(c). Courts are very reluctant to effect exemption clauses in contracts unless the
clauses meet judicial controls which have been developed by Courts.
Explain those Judicial Controls and Support your answer with decided cases.
(5 Marks)
(TOTAL MARKS 30)
4 Write brief notes on the following supporting your answers with Cases and Examples
(b). Critically discuss the rule that acceptance to be effective must be communicated
to the offeror bringing out exceptions thereto and support your answer with
decided Cases. (10 Marks)
(TOTAL MARKS 20)
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Answer Question 1 and any Other 2 Questions
2. Cases & Candid Examples will attract more Marks
3. Illegibility will lead to lose of Marks
4. Time allowed: 2 Hours
1.(a). On 20th January, 2010Nakuru Electronics Limited placed the following notice on the window of
their shop. “2 very nice Laptops – Kshs. 50,000/= each” Nyamoita and Chepkurui are very keen to
acquire the Laptops, but think that the price is too high. They each offer Kshs. 30,000/=. Nakuru
Electronics Limited refuse to sell at that price but says they can accept Kshs. 40,000/= for each Laptop.
Further the company said that it will keep the offer to them open until 30 th January, 2010 12 O’clock, if
each pays it Kshs. 20,000/=, which they did. On 28 th January, 2010, they have to leave for London for
other business but before they leave, each posts a letter stating that they agreed to buy the Laptops at the
agreed price of Kshs. 40,000/= each .Nyamoita’s letter arrives at 10:00 a.m. on 30 th January, 2010.
Chepkurui’s letter arrives on 1st February, 2010. In any event Nakuru electronics Limited had already sold
both Laptops to Nyawira on 29th January, 2010 for a total of Kshs. 100,000/=.
Analyse the above situation from the point of contract Law emphasizing particular on the offer
and acceptance. In particular advise the parties as to their liabilities and the potential remedies
available to them under contract Law. Support your analysis with decided cases and candid
examples. (15 Marks)
(b). Critically discuss the meaning of an offer taking care to distinguish an offer from a mere puff and
from invitations to treat. (7 Marks)
(c). Briefly explain the ways in which an offer can be terminated or brought to an end
(8 Marks)
(TOTAL MARKS 30)
2.(a). Discuss the various presumptions that the Courts have developed to aid them in determining the
intentions of the parties to a contract, citing relevant authorities.
(15 Marks)
(b). Owen, Nyagaka and Chirchir are brothers. They always contribute money and buy Wingo Charity
Sweepstake Tickets but make entries in the name of Nyagaka in order to increase chances of
winning. They were lucky last month and they won I Million shillings. Now Nyagaka has refused
to share claiming that this was a family agreement and there was no intention to create legal
relations.
DECIDE. (5 Marks)
3.(a). Critically discuss the meaning of consideration and indicate it’s role in the process of formation
of contracts. (10 Marks)
(b). In the course of drafting their agreements, parties quite properly seek to define their obligations.
This includes clause which say they will not be liable for certain losses or their liability will be
limited. Courts are very reluctant to enforce these clauses unless they meet judicial controls
which have been set by courts. Briefly, explain these judicial controls and support your answer
with decided cases. (10 Marks)
(TOTAL MARKS 20)
4.(a). The statement made by the parties during negotiations culminating in a contract
may be classified as either terms or mere representations.
Discuss the importance of the distinction and the tests used by courts in distinguishing terms from
mere representations. (10 Marks)
(b). Briefly explain the classification of terms of a contract according to their seriousness or lack of it
and support your answer with decided cases. 10 Marks)
(TOTAL MARKS 20)
(a). The principal that consideration need not to be adequate but that it must be sufficient.
(10 Marks)
(b). The rule that acceptance must be unconditional and must be communicated to the offeror.
(10 Marks) (TOTAL MARKS 20)