HC Writ Petition Sample
HC Writ Petition Sample
HC Writ Petition Sample
IN
Versus
INDEX
1 Notice of motion 1
2 Urgent application 2
4 Undertaking 5
Through
New Delhi
Date: .06.2020
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
NOTICE OF MOTION
Please take notice that the present writ petition has been filed on
Through
New Delhi
Date: .06.2020
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
URGENT APPLICATION
To,
The Deputy Registrar
Hon’ble High Court of Delhi
Sher Shah Suri Road New Delhi,
Sir,
Through
New Delhi
Date: .06.2020
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
Versus
MEMO OF PARTIES
Versus
3. Union of India
Through Ministry of Home Affairs
North Block, Central Secretariat,
New Delhi – 110 011 …...Respondents
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
Through
New Delhi
Date: .06.2020
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
Versus
UNDERTAKING
To,
Sir,
Prayed Accordingly.
Through
New Delhi
Date: .06.2020
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
That the present writ petition has been fled by the petitioner
No. 1.
Lawyers were unable to access their offices. Since the last date
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
LIST OF DATES
April 2020 Since the time was running fast and deadline
was near the Petitioner wrote various emails to
respondents to extend the period of registration
which was extended only to 15.4.2020 despite
Petitioner sought till 30.04.2020. However,
ultimately it was extended upto 19.04.2020.
19.4.2020 The petitioner provided a pen drive containing
detailed roll of advocates.
7.5.2020 On the demand of respondents the Petitioner
again sent a verified and checked data of 29098
advocates who are considered as eligible to take
benefits of the scheme. However, nothing
fruitful is done in this regard.
June 2020, Hence the Petitioner is constrained to file the present
petition.
Hence, the present petition.
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
Versus
To,
Brief facts:
16. That the Petitioner submits that the Respondent No. 1 has
dilly-dallied the implementation of the welfare schemes, which
in fact, ought to have been implemented in the year 2019 itself,
for which the budgetary provision of Rs.50 crores was made
for financial year 2019-2020.
20. That more than 1 and ½ months has elapsed, but the
schemes have not been implemented so far, despite
registration of various advocates, leaving aside those who
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
21. That the Petitioner submits that the welfare schemes have
been unduly delayed depriving the legal community of the
benefits, who have been waiting since end-May-2019. It is
more than one year that the matter has been hanging without
any fault of the legal community.
GROUNDS
25. That the Petitioners have confined the present Writ Petition
to the advocates already registered and the issue in respect of
those advocates in Delhi, who have been left out and could not
register because of failure of Respondent No.1 to afford
reasonable opportunity to grant extension of time beyond
19.04.2020 will be taken up on a separate writ petition before
this Hon’ble Court.
26. That the petitioner has not filled any other/similar petition
before the Hon’ble Apex Court or any other high court.
PRAYER
PETITIONER
Through
Versus
AFFIDAVIT
I, K.C. Mittal, S/o Late Shri M.D. Mittal, aged about 70 years, R/o
E-7, 1st Floor, Anand Niketan, Delhi-110021 do hereby solemnly
affirm and competent to swear.
Deponent
Verification
Deponent
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
ANNESURE-P-2
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
ANNESURE-P-3
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
ANNESURE-P-4
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
ANNESURE-P-5
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
ANNESURE-P-6
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
ANNESURE-P-7
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
IN
Versus
IN
3. That the Petitioner has a strong prima facie case in their favour
and are entitled for the directions by this Hon’ble Court to
adequately protect the interest off 29,098 advocates, whose
enrolments have been verified and are found to be OK, as
desired by the Respondent No. 1 and the complete data in
accordance with their instructions is in possession of
Respondent No. 1 and 2. It is further submitted that since the
petitioner has taken all the necessary step and verified the roll
in due of which The Respondent No. 1 and 2 are duty bound
to implement the welfare scheme immediately and release
money to provide Medical insurance of Rs. 5 lacs and Term
insurance of Rs. 10 lac, to all Advocates, without any further
delay.
6. That the present application has been filled in good faith and
the inters of justice and the same may be allow.
PRAYER
PETITIONER
Through
Versus
AFFIDAVIT
I, K.C. Mittal, S/o Late Shri M.D. Mittal, aged about 70 years, R/o
E-7, 1st Floor, Anand Niketan, Delhi-110021 do hereby solemnly
affirm and competent to swear.
Deponent
Verification
Deponent
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
IN
ILLEGIBLE/HANDWRITTEN/CERTIFIED/TYPED COPIES
PRAYER
may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this
case.
PETITIONER
Through
IN
Versus
AFFIDAVIT
Deponent
Verification
Deponent
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
In re:
Bar Council of Delhi
Through its Chairman K.C. Mittal ...... Petitioner
Versus
Service to
Contact Details
Respondents
Government of NCT of Advocate Bhawna Kataria
Delhi and The Mob: 8588089272
Principal Secretary Email:
(Law & Justice) [email protected]
Delhi Secretariat,
Delhi.
Through its Chief
Secretary