IDP Appendix
IDP Appendix
INTEGRATED
DESIGN PROJECT
1
1.1.2 Indicative Strength Classes for Durability
Source: Annex E (Informative) and Table 2.1, BS EN 1992-1-1:2004
2
1.1.3 Nominal Cover
Source: Table 4.4N, BS EN 1992-1-1:2004
3
1.1.4 Strength and Deformation Characteristics for Concrete
Source: Table 3.1, BS EN 1992-1-1:2004
4
1.2 CHARACTERISTIC VALUES FOR IMPOSED LOADS
Source: BS EN 1991-1-1:2002
5
6
1.3 FLEXURAL MEMBERS DESIGN
𝐾
𝑧 = 𝑑 [0.5 + √(0.25 − )]
1.134
𝑀
𝐴𝑠 =
0.87𝑓𝑦𝑘 𝑧
(𝑑 − 𝑧)
𝑥=
0.4
(𝐾−𝐾𝑏𝑎𝑙 )𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑏𝑑2
𝐴′𝑠 = if d’/x ≤ 0.38 or
0.87𝑓𝑦𝑘 (𝑑−𝑑′)
Shear Design
1
𝑉𝑅𝑑,𝑐 = (0.12 𝑘 (100𝜌1 𝑓𝑐𝑘 )3 ) 𝑏𝑤 𝑑
𝐴𝑆𝐿
𝜌1 =
𝑏𝑤𝑑
200
𝑘 = 1 + √( )
𝑑
𝑓𝑐𝑘
⌊(0.36𝑏𝑤 𝑑𝑓𝑐𝑘 (1 − ))⌋
250
𝑉𝑅𝑑,𝑚𝑎𝑥 =
𝑐𝑜𝑡𝜃 + 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝜃
𝐴𝑠𝑤,𝑚𝑖𝑛 0.08𝑏𝑤 √𝑓𝑐𝑘
=( )
𝑠 𝑓𝑦𝑘
𝐴𝑠𝑤 𝑉𝐸𝑑
=
𝑠 0.78𝑓𝑦𝑘 𝑑 cot 𝜃
7
Source: Book Design Manual, Institution of Structural Engineers, March 2000
8
Source: Book Design Manual, Institution of Structural Engineers, March 2000
9
Shear Resistance of Concrete
⅓
v Rd,c = 0.12k 100 A sl f ck ≥ v RD,C(min) =0.035k 1.5 f ck 0.5
bw d
10
be calculated as: V Rd,S = (A sw /s) f ywd z cot q
V Rd,S ≤ V Rd,max
nforcement 1. VEd < VRd,c Thus, shear reinforcement is not required except in beams where minimum
r reinforcement shear reinforcement must be provided. S = 0.75d (max spacing = 300mm).
ngth of shear reinf.2.= 0.87f
VEd >ykVRd,c Provided VRd,max > VEd
9d (without axial force) Thus, shear reinforcement to be provided using VRd,s.
oncrete compression strut and longitudinal axis.
11
1.3.3 Moment and Shear Coefficient for Solid Slab
Source: 3.5.3.4 and 3.5.3.7, BS 8110: Part 1: 1997
Simply-supported slabs
When simply-supported slabs do not have adequate provision to resist torsion at the corners, and to
prevent the corners from lifting, the maximum moments per unit width are given by the following
equations:
When the slabs are provided with different edge conditions like fixed or continuous edges, the maximum
moments per unit width are given by:
The design shear forces of slab or loads on beams which supported the slabs can be evaluated using
the equations below:
12
13
14
Source: Book Design Manual, Institution of Structural Engineers, March 2000
15
1.3.4 Deflection Check
Source: Table 7.4.2, BS EN 1992-1-1:2004
= As1 / bd
’ = As2 / bd
s = 310 fyk As (required) / 500 As (provided)
16
Source: Reynold's Reinforced Concrete Designer's Handbook. 11 Edition
17
1.3.5 Control of Cracking Without Direct Calculation
Source: 7.3.3, BS EN 1992-1-1:2004
Cracking due to loading is minimized by ensuring that the maximum spacing between longitudinal
reinforcing bars in beam is limited to that given in Table 7.2N.
𝑓𝑦𝑘 𝑔𝑘 +0.3𝑞𝑘 1
Steel stress can be taken as, 𝑓𝑠 = ×
1.15 (1.35𝑔𝑘 +1.5𝑞𝑘 ) 𝛿
Where:
18
1.3.6 Stress-Strain Tabulation in Cross Section
Reynold's Reinforced Concrete Designer's Handbook. 11 Edition.
The theory of bending for reinforced concrete assumes that the concrete will crack in the regions of
tensile strain and that, after cracking all the tension is carried by the reinforcement. It also assumes
that place sections of a structural member remain plane after straining, so that across the section
there must be a linear distribution of strains.
εy = { fy / m } / Es
𝐴𝑠𝑤 𝑇𝐸𝑑
Additional torsional link required, = where cot Ɵ is taken as 2.5
𝑠 2𝐴𝑘 𝑓𝑦𝑑 cot Ɵ
𝑇𝐸𝑑 𝑢𝑘
Additional torsional longitudinal reinforcement required, 𝐴𝑠𝑙 𝑓𝑦𝑑 = cot Ɵ
2𝐴𝑘
where cot Ɵ is taken as 2.5
19
1.4 DESIGN OF COLUMNS
1.4.1 Slenderness Check
Source: 5.8.3.1 and 5.8.3.2, BS EN 1992-1-1:2004
Slenderness ratio
where
lo = the effective length of the column
i = the radius of gyration about the axis considered
I = the second moment of area of the section about the axis
A = the cross-sectional area of the column
For columns in regular frames, an effective length can be determined in the following way:
Braced columns
k1 k2
lo = 0.5l 1 + 1 +
0.45 + k1 0.45 + k 2
Unbraced columns
k ..k k k
lo = l . max 1 + 10. 1 2 ; 1 + 1 . 1 + 2
k1 + k 2 1 + k1 1 + k 2
where
k1, k2 are the relative flexibilities of rotational restraints at ends 1 and 2 respectively
k is column stiffness / beam stiffness = (EI/l)column / 2(EI/l)beam
l is the clear height of compression member between end restraints at each end
Note: k = 0 is the theoretical limit for rigid rotational restraint, and k = ∞ represents the limit for no
restraint at all. Since fully rigid restraint is rare in practice, a minimum value of 0,1 is recommended for
k1 and k2.
Examples of effective length for isolated members with constant cross section are given as follow:
20
Slenderness Limit
The upper limit on the slenderness ratio of a single column which second order may be ignored is:
lim = 20 . A. B . C n
A = 1/(1 + 0.2eff) eff = effective creep ratio
B = (1 + 2)0.5 = Asfyd/(Acfcd)
C = 1.7 – rm rm = Mo1 /Mo2
n = NEd/(Acfcd)
NEd = the design ultimate axial load in the column
Mo1, Mo2 are the first order moments at the end of the column with ׀Mo2׀ ≤ ׀Mo1׀
fyd = the design yield strength of the reinforcement
fcd = the design compressive strength of concrete
If eff, , and rm are not known, A = 0.7, B = 1.1 and C = 0.7 may be used.
If the actual slenderness ratio is less than the calculated value of λlim then the column can be treated as
short. Otherwise the column must be treated as slender and second order effects must be accounted
for in the design of the column.
Effective length, 𝒍𝒆
Source: 3.8.1.6, BS 8110: Part 1: 1997
𝑙𝑒 = β𝑙𝑜 ; where lo clear height between end restraints, β are given in Table 3.19 and Table 3.20.
21
1.4.2 Design Moments
Source: 5.8.3.8, BS EN 1992-1-1:2004
MEd = M0Ed + M2
where
M0Ed = The 1st. order moment including the effect of imperfection
M2 = The nominal 2nd. order moment.
where
M01 = Min{│Mtop│, │Mbot│} + NEd.ei
M02 = Max{│Mtop│, │Mbot│} + NEd.ei
where
e2 = The deflection = (1/r)lo/c
lo = The effective length
c = A factor depending on the curvature distribution, normally 2 ≈ 10
1/r = The curvature = Kr . K . 1/ro
Kr = axial load correction factor = (nu- n)/(nu-nbal) < 1
Short column can be design ignoring second order effects and therefore the ultimate design moment,
MEd = M2
22
23
1.4.3 Reinforcement
Source: 9.5.2, BS EN 1992-1-1:2004
Longitudinal Reinforcement
Transverse Reinforcement
The diameter of links should not be less than 6 mm or one-quarter of the diameter of the largest
longitudinal bar. The maximum spacing of links in columns should not exceed:
• 20 times the minimum diameter of the longitudinal bars
• the lesser dimension of the column
• 300 mm
At the distance within the larger dimension of the column above or below a beam or slab and near
lapped joints these spacing should be reduced by a factor of 0.6. Every longitudinal bar or bundle of
bars placed in a corner should be held by transverse reinforcement. No bar within compression zone
should be further than 150 mm from a restrained bar.
1 1
Active earth pressure = 𝐾𝑎 𝑠 ℎ2 + 𝐾𝑎 wℎ ; Passive earth pressure = 𝐾𝑝 𝑠 ℎ2 + 2c√𝐾𝑝 ℎ
2 2
1−sin Ø ∅
Coef. of active earth pressure, Ka= ; Coef. of passive earth pressure, Kp= tan2 (45 + )
1+sinØ 2
s, h, , , c = unit weight, depth, internal friction angle, friction coefficient and cohesion of backfill.
x, y = horizontal distances of Vk and vertical distances of Hk to point of interest, respectively.
Vk = permanent vertical action (weight of soil and wall)
Hk = horizontal action (permanent earth pressure HGk and variable surcharge HQk)
N = vertical action (Vk + w) M = Moment about the base centreline
B = width of base w = surcharge
I I n Sn
Pn = P n + P.e.
In
( I S ) n n
2
24
1.6 FOUNDATION DESIGN
1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑓𝑐𝑘
𝑉𝑅𝑑,𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 0.5𝑈𝑑 [0.6 ( )] ( )
250 1.5
Pile size (mm) 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 750
Cap depth (mm) 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1400 1800
𝑇
Area of reinforcement, 𝐴𝑠 =
0.87𝑓𝑦𝑘
T = Tension force
fyk = Characteristic yield strength of reinforcement
Tension Force
25
26
1.7 DETAILING
27
28
SECTION 2.0: INFRASTRUCTURAL DESIGN
2.1 GRAVITY SEWERAGE RETICULATION DESIGN
I) Average Flow
The volume of sewage that needs to be treated per day is based on an assumed contribution per
population equivalent of 225 litres from various types of premises where the contribution from each
premise type is defined in terms of a population equivalent. The recommended minimum population
equivalent values are given in Table B1.
III) Infiltration
Infiltration is the amount of groundwater that enters sewers through damage in the network such as
cracked pipes, leaked joint seals and manhole walls, etc. There are many variables affecting infiltration
such as quality of workmanship, joint types, pipe materials, height of water table above pipeline, soil
type, etc. The peak factor above has included the contribution of infiltrations. The maximum allowable
infiltration rate shall be 50 litre / (mm diameter.km of sewer length.day).
29
2.1.2 Pipe Roughness
Source: Section 2.1.16, (National Water Services Commission, 2009a)
Conservative roughness values as given in Table 2.1 shall be referred to when determining sewer
discharge capacity.
Unless special arrangements have been agreed for the structural protection of pipes, the minimum
depth of soil cover over the sewer shall be 1.2 m. Sewers are not to be constructed under buildings.
The minimum size of public gravity sewers shall be 225 mm in diameter. The minimum size of domestic
connections to the public sewer shall be 150 mm in diameter. The maximum design velocity at peak
flow shall not be more than 4.0 m/s.
The design shall be based on the worst case scenario. The selection of the gravity sewer diameter and
gradient to cope with the peak flow shall be based on the following equations:
1. Colebrook-White Equation
K 2.51v
V = −2 2 gDS log s +
3.7 D D 2 gDS
where V = velocity (m/s)
S = hydraulic gradient (m/m)
v = kinematic viscosity of water (1.0 10-6 m2/s)
D = internal diameter (m)
g = acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s2)
Ks = roughness coefficient (m)
Typical Ks values for various types of sewer pipes are presented in Table 2.2 below:
30
2. Manning Equation
R 2/ 3 S1/ 2
V=
n
where V = velocity (m/s)
S = hydraulic gradient (m/m)
R = hydraulic radius
n = Manning coefficient
Typical n values for various types of sewer pipes are presented in Table 2.3 below:
3. Hazen-Williams Equation
V = 0.849CR0.63 S 0.54
where V = velocity (m/s)
S = hydraulic gradient (m/m)
R = hydraulic radius
C = Hazen-Williams coefficient
Typical C values for various types of sewer pipes are presented in Table 2.4 below:
31
2.2 WATER RETICULATION DESIGN
These are estimated based on the submitted Layout Plans, proposed types of physical developments
envisaged, and unit rates of demand by various types of premises as listed in Table B.1.
32
2.2.2 Design Criteria for External Reticulation Networks and Supply Mains
Source: Section B.4.1, (National Water Services Commission, 2018)
C. Hydraulic Requirements
The design of an external reticulation system and supply mains shall comply with the following boundary
conditions, viz:
i. convey peak flows in external reticulation networks (i.e. 2.5 times the average daily demand
flow) and supply mains (i.e. 1.2 times the average daily demand flow) without incurring
head losses greater than 2m/1000m for gravity flow.
ii. convey a combination of average and fire flows without incurring head losses of greater
than 15 m/1000m within external reticulation networks.
iii. convey flows with a velocity of not less than 0.3 m/sec in order to reduce deposition of
sediments; if this condition cannot be met justifications for lower flow velocities and related
implication on maintenance to be submitted to Commission / Certifying Agency for
consideration.
iv. maximum flow velocities not to exceed 2.0 m/sec. However, flow velocities along pumping
mains located within a pump station (i.e. header system) may exceed this value.
v. the minimum pipe size in an external reticulation network system shall be 100mm.
vi. the following residual pressures shall be maintained within an external reticulation system:
o During peak flow conditions the minimum residual pressure at each node shall be
of such magnitude as to enable water to flow directly into a storage cistern located
up to 15 metres above a building platform level without the need for pumping. The
discharge residual pressure at the highest supply level (HSL) shall not be lower
than 7.5 metres. This shall be applicable to a development area where the source
of water is drawn directly from a supply main or from a service reservoir with the
hydraulic calculations based on the bottom water level (BWL).
o During combined average flow and fire flow conditions the minimum residual
pressure at each node shall be maintained at 7.5 meters above the building
platform level.
o All pipelines within an external reticulation system shall operate within a static
pressure not exceeding 30m at all flow conditions. Subject to the approval of the
Commission /Certifying Agency, pressure reducing valves shall be provided where
the static pressure exceeds 30m in a pipeline.
vii. the static pressure at any point along a supply mains shall not exceed 50 meters head.
Both the Hazen Williams and Colebrook White hydraulic formulae may be employed to assist in
determining the size of a pipeline. The friction factors, i.e. ‘C’ value, to be employed in the Hazen
William formulae are summarized in Table B.7.
10.67Q1.85
Head loss, hf =
C1.85 D 4.87
33
2.3 DRAINAGE DESIGN AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
34
Design Chart 2.A1: Nomograph for the Estimation of Overland Flow Time (to) for Sheet Flow (IEA, 1977)
Table 2.3: Values of Manning’s Roughness Coefficient (n) for Open Drains and Pipes
(Chow, 1959; DID, 2000 and French, 1985)
Drain/Pipe Manning Roughness n
Grassed Drain
Short Grass Cover (< 150 mm) 0.035
Tall Grass Cover (≥ 150 mm) 0.050
Lined Drain
Concrete
Smooth Finish 0.015
Rough Finish 0.018
Stone Pitching
Dressed Stone in Mortar 0.017
Random Stones in Mortar or Rubble Masonry 0.035
Rock Riprap 0.030
Brickwork 0.020
Pipe Material
Vitrified Clay 0.012
Spun Precast Concrete 0.013
Fibre Reinforced Cement 0.013
UPVC 0.011
Table 2.5: Recommended Runoff Coefficients for Various Landuses (DID, 1980; Chow et al., 1988;
QUDM, 2007 and Darwin Harbour, 2009)
Landuse Runoff Coefficient (C)
For Minor System For Major System
(≤10 yr ARI) (> 10 yr ARI)
Residential
Bungalow 0.65 0.70
Semi-detached Bungalow 0.70 0.75
Link and Terrace House 0.80 0.90
Flat and Apartment 0.80 0.85
Condominium 0.75 0.80
Commercial and Business Centres 0.90 0.95
Industrial 0.90 0.95
Sport Fields, Park and Agriculture 0.30 0.40
Open Spaces
Bare Soil (No Cover) 0.50 0.60
Grass Cover 0.40 0.50
Bush Cover 0.35 0.45
Forest Cover 0.30 0.40
Roads and Highways 0.95 0.95
Water Body (Pond)
Detention Pond (with outlet) 0.95 0.95
Retention Pond (no outlet) 0.00 0.00
35
2.3.3 Average Rainfall Intensity
Source: Equation 2.2, (Department of Irrigation and Drainage Malaysia, 2011)
𝑇ᵏ
Average rainfall intensity, 𝑖=
(𝑑 + 𝜃)ᶯ
𝐶𝑖𝐴
Peak flow, 𝑄=
360
where, Q = peak flow (m3/s)
C = runoff coefficient (Table 2.5)
i = average rainfall intensity (mm/hr)
A = drainage area (ha) (Note: 1 ha = 10000m2)
Peak flow, Q = VA
R 2/ 3 S1/ 2
Manning’s formula: velocity, V =
n
where V = velocity (m/s)
S = hydraulic gradient (m/m)
R = hydraulic radius
n = Manning coefficient (Table 2.3)
36
Orifice flow rate, Q (m3/s) = CoAo(2gHo)0.5
where
Co = Discharge coefficient (0.60);
Ao = X-sectional area of orifice (m2);
Ho = Effective head of the orifice measured from the centroid of the opening (m);
G = Gravitational acceleration (9.81 m/s2)
37
2.3.6 IDF Curve and Constants
Source: Figure 2.2, Appendix 2.B, (Department of Irrigation and Drainage Malaysia, 2011)
38
39
40
41
SECTION 3.0: SOIL PRESSURE AND PILE SPECIFICATION
3.1 Allowable Soil Pressure
Source: JKR Mackintosh Probe
Relationship between S.P.T. Mackintosh Probe (J.K.R. Probe) and Allowable Soil Pressure for Sand
N Relative density Allowable soil J.K.R. or Mackintosh
(Blow/ft.) pressure Blow/ft
(kPa)
0-4 Very Loose Not suitable 0 – 10
4 - 10 Loose 0 – 080 10 – 30
10 - 30 Medium 80 – 280 30 – 80
30 - 50 Dense 280 – 470 80 – 110
Over 50 Very Dense 470 110
Relationship between S.P.T. Mackintosh Probe (J.K.R. Probe) and Allowable Soil Pressure for Clay
N Relative density Unconfined J.K.R. or Mackintosh
(Blow/ft.) Compressive Strength Blow/ft
(kPa)
2 Very Soft 0 - 25 0 – 10
2-4 Soft 25 – 50 10 – 20
4-8 Medium (firm) 50 – 100 20 – 40
8 - 15 Stiff 100 – 200 40 – 70
15 - 30 Very Stiff 200 - 400 70 - 100
Over 30 Hard 400 100
Notes:
Maximum and recommended axial working loads shown are theoretical structural capacities of piles.
Actual working capacities are dependent on soil conditions and other considerations, but shall not
exceed maximum axial working loads shown.
42
Reinforced Concrete Pile Specification
Source : Spun Pile Product Catalogue, Eng Beng Group Sdn Bhd
43
REFERENCES
British Standard Institution, B. (1997). BS8110 (1997). Code of Practice for Design and
Construction. Part 1, BSI London, UK.
Malaysian Sewerage Industry Guidelines Volume III Sewer Networks and Pump Stations,
(2009a).
44