0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views6 pages

Litholyme: A Safer and More Cost Effective CO Absorbent

1) Litholyme is a new CO2 absorbent that uses a lithium catalyst, making it safer than traditional soda lime-based absorbents. 2) Unlike traditional absorbents, Litholyme does not react with common inhaled anesthetic agents even when desiccated, eliminating risks of generating toxic byproducts. 3) Studies show Litholyme does not produce harmful compounds when exposed to anesthetic agents, whereas traditional absorbents produce high levels of toxic gases when desiccated. Litholyme offers premium safety at a cost comparable to traditional absorbents.

Uploaded by

Karan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views6 pages

Litholyme: A Safer and More Cost Effective CO Absorbent

1) Litholyme is a new CO2 absorbent that uses a lithium catalyst, making it safer than traditional soda lime-based absorbents. 2) Unlike traditional absorbents, Litholyme does not react with common inhaled anesthetic agents even when desiccated, eliminating risks of generating toxic byproducts. 3) Studies show Litholyme does not produce harmful compounds when exposed to anesthetic agents, whereas traditional absorbents produce high levels of toxic gases when desiccated. Litholyme offers premium safety at a cost comparable to traditional absorbents.

Uploaded by

Karan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 6

Litholyme: A Safer and more Cost Effective CO2 Absorbent

Introduction:
In recent years there has been a struggle between cost and safety when it comes to the use of CO 2 absorbents in
the operating arena. Increasingly, institutions are adopting low flow anesthesia protocols which realize significant
departmental cost savings, but these procedures have been found to also significantly increase the risks associated
i
with desiccation of soda lime based CO2 absorbents . The use of premium CO2 absorbents which eliminate the
risks associated with desiccation help to resolve this problem, but the premium price of these special absorbents
reduce total cost savings that can be achieved. Another common alternative for cost reduction in the operating
arena is the use of affordable conventional soda lime based absorbents in both standard and low flow systems.
This approach requires more vigilant monitoring of the system and patient to minimize risks, and can be effective
ii
when followed correctly , but the risk of patient injury from desiccated absorbent cannot be fully eliminated.
Neither of these approaches is optimal in fully capturing the benefits of safety for the anesthesiologist and
minimizing costs for the hospital system.

A proprietary new CO2 absorbent, Litholyme, from Allied Healthcare Products, Inc., warrants a new look at this
recurring dilemma by offering premium performance and ultimate safety, while maintaining a cost comparable
with traditional soda lime based absorbents.

Traditional vs. Premium absorbents


All CO2 absorbents use a catalyst, calcium hydroxide and water which react with CO2 to form calcium carbonate,
water and heat. During this cyclical process, calcium hydroxide is continually re-moistened during the exothermic
reaction of CO2 absorption until it has become fully exhausted and converted to calcium carbonate. While all CO2
absorbents undergo the same basic process to capture CO 2, there lie important safety differences between
traditional and premium absorbents which stem primarily from the catalyst that is used in the formulation.

Traditional CO2 absorbents use Sodium or Potassium catalysts to facilitate the CO2 absorption reaction. Under
+ - + -
desiccated conditions the reactive Na OH or K OH catalysts can preferentially bind and process inhaled
anesthetic agents (Sevoflurane, Isoflurane, and Desflurane) into toxic carbon monoxide, and in the case of
iii
Sevoflurane, compound A, a known nephrotoxin . In additional to this potential for generation of harmful
substances, Sodium and Potassium hydroxide catalysts used in traditional CO2 absorbents remain in the exhausted
material regenerate after use, causing the reversion of the pH based dyes that are used to indicate exhaustion.
Indicator dye color reversion renders this safety mechanism unpredictable and increases the probability of
inadvertent re-use of exhausted absorbent.

Premium CO2 absorbents do not use NaOH or KOH, but instead incorporate proprietary formulations containing
catalysts that do not react with common inhaled anesthetic agents, even under desiccated conditions. The
absence of the Sodium and Potassium hydroxide catalysts also eliminates the potential for regeneration of the
indicator dye, and provides the benefit of a permanent color change. To date, CO2 absorbents that confer these
enhanced safety characteristics have carried a premium price, limiting their adoption.

Despite the additional expense of premium CO 2 absorbents, the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation considers
them best practice in the market due to their increased safety, especially in low-flow systems where gasses are
iv
subject to longer exposure to the CO2 absorbent .

What is Litholyme?
Litholyme is a new premium CO2 absorbent which incorporates a Lithium catalyst to facilitate CO2 absorption. Like
other premium formulations, this lithium catalyst does not react with common inhaled anesthetic agents and
therefore eliminates the potential for generation of Carbon Monoxide or Compound A. Unlike other premium
absorbents however, Litholyme is cost effective to produce and therefore can be sold at prices similar to
traditional CO2 absorbents, making Litholyme the safest and most cost effective CO2 absorbent on the market.

1 Rev: 5-2013
Litholyme’s proprietary formulation provides equivalent canister life to that of traditional absorbents yet offers key
features like non-reactivity with inhaled anesthetic agents, permanent color change indication, and lower
exothermic reactivity, making it ideal for use in all standard and low-flow medical anesthesia applications.

Litholyme meets all of the recommendations for CO 2 absorbent selection from the 2005 APSF conference on safety
considerations for CO2 absorbent and its patented formula provides several significant advantages over other CO2
absorbents on the market today when it comes to both safety and cost effectiveness.

Litholyme is safe, even when subjected to total desiccation:


Desiccation of CO2 absorbent is a common concern for anesthesiologists as it facilitates degradation of anesthetic
agents in traditional soda lime and reduces the capacity of the CO2 absorbent. In 2005, recurring safety issues
related to desiccation of CO2 absorbent culminated in the formation of a task force by the Anesthesia Patient
Safety Foundation to address the issue Carbon dioxide Absorbent desiccation. From this meeting guidelines were
established reduce the potential for use of desiccated CO2 absorbent. The first of these recommendations is to use
a CO2 absorbent whose composition is such that exposure to volatile anesthetics does not result in significant
ii
degradation of the volatile anesthetic .

Litholyme’s patented formulation effectively eliminates the risks associated with CO2 absorbent dehydration by
eliminating the potential for anesthetic reagent interaction or excessive heat through the use of a lithium catalyst.

Litholyme eliminates the potential for generation of Carbon Monoxide or Compound A:


Traditional CO2 absorbents incorporate strong bases like NAOH or KOH to catalyze the absorption reaction. Under
dehydration, these strong bases begin to bind and degrade commonly used anesthetic agents like Sevoflurane,
v
Isoflurane, Desflurane, and Nitrous Oxide forming hazardous byproducts like Carbon Monoxide and Compound A.
vi
A side by side study was performed by Dr. Thomas Dahms to compare degradation products of Litholyme to that
of other commercially available premium and traditional CO2 absorbents under normal conditions and under
conditions that simulate a situation in which the fresh gas flow was left on over the weekend. This study
introduced Sevoflurane and Desflurane respectively into a simulated patient environment using hydrated and
desiccated CO2 absorbents. Several CO2 absorbents were exposed to these anesthetic agents under both hydrated
(12%-18% moisture as supplied by manufacturer) conditions and following 36 hours of desiccation from constant
fresh gas flow at 4 liters per minute without the introduction of CO2 (resulting in 81%-86% moisture loss). The
data below indicates the byproduct concentration of each CO2 absorbent during one hour of exposure to
anesthetic agents following these CO2 absorbent treatments. While traditional soda lime based absorbents
showed significant accumulation of byproducts under desiccated conditions, Litholyme did not produce any
Compound A or Carbon Monoxide.

Comparison of Accumulated Compound A Production under Hydrated and Desiccated Conditions

2 Rev: 5-2013
50 45 45 Normal Hydration
Full Desiccation
40 35 35

30
PPM
20

10 3 3 0 0 0 0
0
Sodasorb Medisorb Sodasorb LF Amsorb Plus Litholyme

Comparison of Accumulated Carbon Monoxide Production Under Hydrated and Desiccated Conditions
Brand Name Sodasorb Medisorb Sodasorb LF Amsorb Plus Litholyme
Normal Hydration (12%-18% moisture) 1 ppm 1 ppm 0 ppm 0 ppm 0 ppm
Full Desiccation (81-86% moisture loss) >1000 ppm >1000 ppm 0 ppm 0 ppm 0 ppm

Litholyme is minimally exothermic:


It is widely recognized that the absorption of CO2 is exothermic and that this exothermic reaction becomes more
prominent with dehydration of the CO2 absorbent. With some traditional CO2 absorbents this exothermic reaction
vii
can generate temperatures high enough to cause potential combustion of the anesthetic gases . Even under
normal conditions with both conventional and premium CO 2 absorbents the higher temperatures that are seen
with low flow anesthesia have been thought to increase the rate of degradation of anesthetic gasses, and in the
viii
case of Sevoflurane, suspected to increase production of Compound A .

Regulation of heat in the breathing system is an important factor to consider when choosing a CO2 absorbent. It
has been indicated that moderate levels of heat in a closed circuit, low flow system can be beneficial to the
ix
regulation of the anesthetic agent and can increase patient comfort during the procedure . Excessive heat, on the
other hand, has been shown to increase absorption of inhaled anesthetic agents and, with traditional soda lime
based absorbents, increase the rate of anesthetic degradation into harmful byproducts.

The CO2 absorption reaction that takes place with Litholyme is less exothermic than traditional CO2 absorbents and
therefore generates only low levels of heat, making it safer for use in both standard and low-flow applications.

A controlled study was performed which compared the maximum temperature achieved in competitive CO2
absorbent canisters under conditions that have been known to generate high levels of heat using traditional CO 2
absorbents. The study measured the absorbent bed temperature of several CO2 absorbents through the process
of consumption as they were subjected to 500ml/min gas flow with CO2 levels of 35-40 mmHg (250-300 ml/min).
The table below shows a side by side comparison of the maximum temperature achieved for commonly used
traditional CO2 absorbents Sodasorb and Medisorb, as well as the premium CO2 absorbents Sodasorb LF, Amsorb
Plus and Litholyme. This data shows that none of the current CO2 absorbents on the market generate dangerous
levels of heat under these conditions. All of the premium CO2 absorbents produced lower levels of heat than the
traditional soda lime based absorbents. Under these conditions Litholyme produced a maximal bed temperature of

61 C

3 Rev: 5-2013
Temperatures Achieved During Desiccation of
CO2 Absorbent
75 75 72
80
61
Temperature (◦C)

60 46

40

20

0
SodaSorb MediSorb SodaSorb LF Amsorb Plus Litholyme
CO2 Absorbent
.

Litholyme incorporates a permanent and profound color change indicator:


Litholyme’s patented formulation incorporates ethyl violet, a common indicator dye, in a way that provides all the
benefits of a pH based indicator dye, but does not allow the color of the indicator to revert over time.

Soda Lime based products on the market also use Ethyl Violet, a pH based indicator which turns violet when the
CO2 absorbent is exhausted. Ethyl Violet has a critical pH of 10.3 at which the compound changes from colorless to
violet due to the elimination of a hydroxyl ion and a resultant shift in the light absorption frequency of the
molecule into the visible range. As conventional soda lime based products absorb CO2, they drop in pH from
around 13.5 in fresh absorbent to below 10 when expended. This pH shift causes the bonded indicator dye to turn
x
violet .

Unfortunately, with conventional CO2 absorbents, if they are left to sit once expended, they can revert to their
fresh white color, even though they are fully consumed. This is due to the regeneration of Sodium Hydroxide or
Potassium Hydroxide in the spent absorbent. While these strong bases are consumed during the CO2 absorption
reaction, their properties are such that they are capable of slowly regenerating until the pH of the absorbent rises
above 10, at which point the absorbent once again loses its violet color.

The absence of Sodium Hydroxide or Potassium Hydroxide in Litholyme ensures that once Litholyme turns to
violet, it will remain violet permanently. It also produces a more vibrant violet color than other absorbents that
use ethyl violet. The result is that once Litholyme is exhausted it stays violet, and the unmistakable color change
provides certain indication of the status of the absorbent.

4 Rev: 5-2013
Fresh Litholyme has a grayish white color which changes to a deep violet color as the granules are
exhausted. This Gradual color change is permanent and will not revert if left to sit.

Litholyme provides efficient canister life:


With other premium CO2 absorbents, the formulation that allows them to offer increased safety also provides
absorption capacity as much as 30% lower than that of traditional CO2 absorbents, resulting in more frequent
canister changes. This lower efficiency translates into substantial additional departmental costs over time and
occasionally requires a change in departmental protocol to accommodate the shorter canister life.

Litholyme’s patented formulation has a high CO2 absorption capacity similar to that of traditional soda lime based
absorbents. To demonstrate the comparative canister life of CO2 absorbents, an independent side-by-side study
was performed which measured the absorbent capacity of various brands of CO2 absorbents under standard flow
conditions. This study demonstrates that under controlled conditions the absorption capacity of Litholyme is
statistically equivalent to that of traditional CO2 absorbents, and statistically larger than that of Amsorb Plus. In
this experiment Litholyme produced an average absorption capacity of 150 Liters CO2/Kg, before 0.5 % FiCO2
breakthrough occurred, where Amsorb Plus produced an average absorption capacity of only 120 Liters CO2/Kg.
In fact, Litholyme’s marketing literature claims a high absorption capacity of 169 L/kg, more than that of even
some traditional CO2 absorbents.

Mean Capacity per Kilogram CO2 absorbent


Carbon dioxide Absorption Capacity

200.0
175.0
150.0
L/kg STPD

125.0
100.0
75.0
50.0
25.0
0.0
Sodasorb Medisorb Sodasorb LF Amsorb Plus Litholyme
The similar CO2 absorption capacity of Litholyme as compared to traditional CO2 absorbents makes Litholyme an
ideal candidate for substitution in modern anesthesia protocols.

Litholyme’s combination of enhanced safety and reliable performance offered at traditional CO 2 absorbent prices
make it possible to achieve the highest level of safety at lower costs than ever before. Regardless of whether your
institution is currently using traditional soda lime or a premium CO2 absorbent, Litholyme should be given strong
consideration for its ability to enhance safety while maintaining or significantly reducing the cost of departmental
operations under standard or low flow applications.

5 Rev: 5-2013
i
Strum D, “Low-flow anesthesia: Anesthetic degradation of to carbon monoxide and Compound A”, Current
opinion in Anesthesiology. 1995, 8:521-525
ii
Olympio MA. Carbon Dioxide absorbent desiccation safety conference convened by APSF. Anesthesia Patient
Safety Foundation Newsletter. Summer 2005, pp 25-29 (www.apsf.org).
iii
S. Singal, “Sevoflurane Hepatotoxicity: A Case Report of Sevoflurane Hepatic Necrosis and Review of the
Literature” , American Journal of Therapeutics: March/April 2010 - Volume 17 - Issue 2 - pp 219-222
iv
APSF Newsleter, Volume 20, No. 2, 25-44
v
Morio M, Fujii K, Satoh N, et al. Reaction of sevoflurane and its degradation products with soda lime: Toxicity of
the byproducts. Anesthesiology 1992;77:1159–64
vi
Dahms T, “Dehydrated Litholyme does not produce CO when exposed to inhalation agents” Dept.
Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
vii
ECRI Editorial Staff: Hazard Report: Anesthesia carbon dioxide absorber fires. Health Devices 2003; 32:436-40
viii
Bito H, Ikeda K. Effect of total flow rate on the concentration of degradation products generated by reaction
between sevoflurane and soda lime. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1995; 74: 667-669
ix
Brock N, “Low flow anesthesia revisited”, Can Vet J Volume 36, June 1995
x
http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?amp%3BDISPLAY=DESC&IA=GB2001004673&DISPLAY=CLAIMS

6 Rev: 5-2013

You might also like