In The Court of - Add. District & Sessions Judge Karachi Central

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

IN THE COURT OF ____ ADD.

DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE


KARACHI CENTRAL
Cr. Bail Application No. _________/2018
In, Cr. Case No. ________/2018

Asif
S/o Bahadur Ali ……………….…………………....Applicant / Accused

Versus

The State …………………………………………………......Respondent

FIR No. 359/2018


U/s. 23(i)-A SAA
PS. Sir Syed, Karachi Central

BAIL APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 497 Cr.P.C.

It is most respectfully prayed on behalf of the applicant/ accused above named

that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased toenlarge him bail pending trial inter-alia on

the following facts and ground: -

FACTS

1. The brief facts of the FIR are that on 25-10-2018, The ASI Mr. Akbar Ali

Abbasi of PS Sir Syed has lodged the above FIR, wherein he stated that

accused / applicant was arrested on dated 25-10-2018 accused / applicant

named above was arrested in crime no. 358/2018, under section 23(i)-A SAA,

and officer made body search from accused and recovered one pistol 30 bore

(not in working condition) with 02 live bullets. As such separate FIR no

359/2018, u/s 23(i)-A SAA has been lodged against the applicant / accused.

(Copy of FIR is attached and marked as annexure “A”)

2. That on dated 26-10-2018 investigation officer produced accused / applicant

before court of law for remand and accused remanded to Judicial Custody and

confined in District Prison Malir, Hence this bail application on following

grounds:
GROUNDS

I. That the applicant / accused is quite innocent and has falsely been implicated in

this false and fabricated case, due to not completion the demands of police

personals.

II. That there is no reasonable ground to believe that the applicant / accused has

committed the alleged offence, as such the prosecution does not possess any

substantial evident against him.

III. That it is not mentioned in the FIR that either recovered case property /

weapons sealed on the spot or not.

IV. That the said FIR is totally silent about the facts of arresting of accused and

recovery.

V. That as per the contents of FIR no. 358/2018 that the recovery weapon from

applicant / accused is not working condition, therefore the section under

section 23-(i)A SAA is not attracted against the accused / applicant.

VI. That as per contents of FIR the distance between place of arrest and police

station about 1 and ½ KM, whereas the incident occurred at 0130 hours and

FIR was lodged after 1 hour delay at 0245 hours.

VII. That nothing incriminating material has been recovered from the possession of

the applicant / accused and if any recovery is foisted upon the applicant /

accused, due to the police party was demanded illegal gratification from the

accused, on refusal police party booked him in instant case.

VIII. That the applicant was arrested on doubt basis and police indulged the

applicant in false and fake cases without any charge even recovery of weapon

is foisted upon the applicant / accused.


IX. That the place of occurrence is thickly populated road and usually rush of public were

present till late night, but complainant has failed to recorded the statements of

locality persons and not fulfilled the requirement of investigation, it is clear

violation of section 103 Cr.P.C, hence the matter falls for further inquiry as the

superior courts held time and again that the basis principle is bail not jail.

Relied upon 1998 P.Cr.L.J 1381 (Karachi).

X. That the police has completed investigation and send to accused for jail authority and

he no more required for any further Investigation, therefore the accused is

entitle for bail in the instant case.

XI. That the offence does not fall under prohibitory clause of section 497(2) Cr.P.C. and

applicant / accused is entitle for concision of bail.

XII. That the applicant / accused not a previously convicted nor is habitual

offenders.

XIII. That the applicant / accused is law- abiding citizen and there is no

apprehension of his absconding or tempering PWs if released on bail.

XIV. That the applicant e/ accused is ready to furnish solvent surety to the entire

satisfaction of this Hon’ble Court.

XV. That the applicant / accused under take to appear before this Hon’ble Court on

each date of hearing.

XVI. The undersigned craves permission from this Hon’ble Court to advance further

argument at the time of hearing of this application.

Prayed accordingly.

Karachi.
Dated________________ ADVOCATE FOR THE
APPLICANT / ACCUSED

You might also like