Water 10 00425
Water 10 00425
Water 10 00425
Review
Review of River Basin Water Resource Management
in China
Hong Zhang 1, *, Gui Jin 2 and Yan Yu 2
1 School of Urban and Environment, Yunnan University of Finances and Economics, Kunming 650221, China
2 Faculty of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China;
[email protected] (G.J.); [email protected] (Y.Y.)
* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-871-65113765
Received: 1 January 2018; Accepted: 30 March 2018; Published: 4 April 2018
Abstract: Water resources are the basis for supporting the entire life system of the Earth. However,
with the frequent global water crises—especially in the river basins of China—the issue of water
resources has become a bottleneck that limits its development. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out
relevant research. In this paper, we systematically analyzed different classification methods of the
service functions of water ecosystems as well as factors that affect it. Results showed that climate,
land cover, human activities, and their own endowment conditions were the main factors affecting
the service functions of water ecosystems. Based on these, water resource management in China river
basins was expounded from three aspects: water resources protection, allocation, and utilization.
At the same time, the impacts of water resource management on land use in China were also
summarized. Finally, the key trends of the next study were summarized as follows: improvement of
the classification system of basin water ecosystem service functions, improvement of the mechanism
of the basin water market; comprehensive tradeoff of water resource exploitation and protection in
basins; and basin water resource management from the perspective of multidisciplinary crossing.
Keywords: water resource management; water ecosystem service functions; water crisis; China; basin
1. Introduction
Water is a fundamental natural resource and a strategic economic resource, and is an indispensable
material foundation for human survival and social development [1]. Not only does the water ecosystem
provide basic products for maintaining human life and production activities, but it also maintains the
functions of natural ecosystem structure, ecological processes, and regional ecological environment,
which play an important role in the development of human society [2]. However, in recent decades,
due to the influence of climate change, land cover change, human activities, and its own vulnerabilities,
the water ecosystem has been destroyed, its service functions have been threatened, and water resource
problems have been increasingly prominent [3].
As basic units of the natural formation of water resources, river basins are facing increasingly
serious problems. Owning the sevens basins of the Yangtze River, the Yellow River, the Yearl River,
the Songhua River, the Huaihe River, the Haihe River and the Liaohe River, China is one of the
earliest countries that developed and utilized water basin resources [4]. With rapid social economic
development and population growth, the demand for basin water resources increases constantly, while
the supply of water resources in basins is limited, thus exacerbating the contradiction between supply
and demand of basin water resources in China. The contradiction is increasingly prominent, especially
in northern basin regions of water shortages [5]. Moreover, the utilization rate of basin water resources
is too high, and has exceeded the global average over the same period in recent years. Among them,
the utilization rate of water resources of the three major basins of the Haihe River, the Yellow River,
and the Huaihe River is the highest—40% higher than the international standard. As a result, the
sustainable development of basin water resources has been severely affected, causing serious problems
in the basin water eco-environment and undermining the stability of the basin water ecosystems [6].
Water resources provide an important condition for the social and economic development of
basins. However, the problems of water resources in basins become worse in China, which has
seriously hampered the sustainable development of the economy and environment in basins [7]. As a
relatively complete resource management unit and a concentrated area of human activities, a basin
serves not only as a carrier for human needs and the survival of water ecosystems, but is also the
crux of the problems to mitigate contradictions between supply and demand of resources, man and
nature, the development and the protection of the water environment [8]. Integrated water resource
management at the basin level is the basis for the nation’s water resources allocation, so conducting
water resource management in the basin is a significant object of study at the decision-making level in
China [9]. However, China presently lacks a systematic and further study of the integrated management
of basin water resources, resulting in less information on water resources management that can be
provided as foundation for decision-making. Thus, we cannot effectively solve the problems of water
resources and achieve their sustainable use. Therefore, exploring river basin management has become
a hot and difficult point in current research on water resources in China. On the basis of summarizing
the classifications and influencing factors of water ecosystem service functions, this paper summarizes
China’s progress in the management of water resources in river basins through the management of
basin water ecosystem service functions. It also discusses the impact of water resource management on
land use, in order to provide references for the solutions of water resource problems in Chinese basins.
ecosystem products and the environment that supports and sustains mankind’s survival [16,17].
On the basis of this, Zhao et al. divided the water ecosystem service functions into product
manufacturing with direct use value and life supporting with indirect use value, according to the
characteristics of consumption and marketization of aquatic ecosystem services [18]. Considering the
economic and ecological properties of water resources, Zhai et al. studied the 18 entire streams of
Cangshan as a research area, dividing the functions into two types: economic and ecological service
functions [17,19]. In addition, Wang et al. studied the Xiangxi River (the largest tributary of the Three
Gorges Reservoir in Hubei Province), with references to the classifications of water ecosystem service
functions at home and abroad. According to the compositional characteristics of the Xiangxi River
water ecosystem, characteristics, ecological processes, and utilities, the service functions of aquatic
ecosystems are divided into three categories: product functions, regulatory support functions, and
cultural functions [20]. Li and others referred to the classifications of water ecosystem service functions
by predecessors and combined the characteristics of the water system in the study area, divided water
ecosystem service functions into five functions: water supply, regulation, product, recreation and
entertainment, and human landscape [21].
As scholars continue to research the service functions of water ecosystems in China, their
classifications are increasingly specific and more in line with the characteristics and research purposes
of the study areas. However, these studies in China started late, and a unified classification system
of water ecosystem service functions has not yet been set up. The relevant studies frequently
directly refer to and use foreign classification methods, and how to establish a classification system
of water ecosystem service functions in line with China’s national conditions is still a problem to be
solved [19,22].
the terrestrial surface systems of Earth are unprecedented. One of the most important changes in the
terrestrial surface systems is the change in land cover, while land cover change has a significant impact
on the hydrology water resources [31,32]. In the short term, land cover change is one of the main
drivers of hydrological changes in basins [33]. The conversions of natural woodland and grassland
into cultivated land are the most extensive land-based change processes. China is a populous country
that relies on irrigated farmland to produce 70% of the food for its population of over one billion.
Therefore, the changes of land cover characteristics in China are extensive and have a significant
impact on the service functions of basin aquatic ecosystems [2,34]. The changes of land cover will
change the interception of surface vegetation and surface evaporation, thus affecting the hydrological
regime and the mechanism of confluence and drainage in river basins and increasing the frequency
and intensity of flood disaster [35]. Changes in land cover will also change the soil structure, affecting
soil hydraulic conductivities and water retention characteristics, thus affecting aquatic ecosystem
functions such as carbon sequestration, soil erosion protection, and water cycle [32,36]. In addition,
with the expansion of cultivated land, the demand for agricultural water is increasing, and the use of
chemical fertilizers and pesticides is also increasing [34]. The loss of biodiversity is also on the rise,
which all have important impacts on surface runoff, water quality, groundwater and water purification
capacity, thus affecting water and soil conservation, supply of products, climate regulation, and other
service functions of basin water ecosystems [37,38].
Human activities also have important impacts on the service functions of river basin aquatic
ecosystems. In recent years, with humanity’s increasing demand for industrial, domestic, and
agricultural water, the imbalance between the supply of water ecosystem services and the demand for
urbanization in river basins is becoming increasingly salient [2], and the pressure of water resources
in basins has greatly increased. Especially, the basins in arid and semi-arid areas are facing greater
challenges [39]. In order to meet the needs of production and life, China has carried out excessive
exploitations and utilizations of water resources in many river basins, but it has neglected the ecosystem
service value of basin aquatic ecosystems, leading to the interruption of rivers, the loss of wetlands, and
threats to biodiversity; thus, the service functions of basin water ecosystems have degenerated. Among
these exploitations, the construction of water conservancy facilities has a significant impact on basin
aquatic ecosystems. The closure of upstream reservoirs and the construction of water conservancy
projects degrades the biodiversity of the watershed and affects the erosion protection, hydropower
generation, and other service functions of aquatic ecosystems, resulting in the severe degeneration of
the service functions of the entire basin aquatic ecosystem [40]. Meanwhile, water conservancy projects
also affect the service functions of river basin water ecosystems by affecting hydrological factors such
as flow velocity, flow, and runoff in lower reaches [41].
There are many factors that affect the service functions of water ecosystems in basins—not only
external factors such as climate, land cover, and human activities, but also the intrinsic endowment
conditions of the river basin aquatic ecosystems, including water quality, water quantity, evaporation,
and other factors (i.e., internal factors) [40]. The influence mechanism of watershed aquatic ecosystem
service functions is a very complex system, which is usually the coupling effect of many factors to
change the service functions of watershed aquatic ecosystems. Therefore, the related research in
our country has also shifted from the early single factor studies to the present more comprehensive
multi-factor studies, and the management of river basin water resources should also consider multiple
factors that affect the service functions of river basin aquatic ecosystems.
pressing task of the Chinese government, and more and more scholars are beginning to pay attention
to the research of water resource management. Foreign research on water resource management
originated from Masse’s reservoir optimization and dispatch in the 1940s. Since the 1960s, with the
introduction of system analysis theory and optimization techniques and the development of computer
technology, research on water resource management moved into the rapid development stage.
The research scopes have been continuously expanded and the depth further increased. In addition,
the research is increasingly focused on multi-objective analysis. With the help of the combination
of computer technologies and corresponding mathematical methods, multiple research methods
have been exploited, including stochastic linear models, nonlinear models, static models, dynamic
programming models, lumped parameter models, and so on [43,44]. Since the 1990s, the theoretical
systems and research methods of water resource management have been gradually improved, focusing
on water quality constraints and environmental benefits constraints [45–50]. Domestic research on
water resource management started later. The studies on water resource allocation led by reservoir
optimal operation began in the 1960s [51]. In the 1980s, the departments of geology, water conservancy,
and transportation jointly carried out the investigation and evaluation of water resources in China,
which laid a good foundation for water resource management research [52–56]. Since then, the research
on water resource management in China has been developing rapidly.
On the basis of monitoring the soil and water loss in the typical model of “Grain for Green” in the
Three Gorges Reservoir area, Zeng et al. found that the implementation of “Grain for Green” and
“Grain for Blue” could prevent soil erosion and significantly improve the water and soil conservation
functions of aquatic ecosystems [61]. In addition, through the study of water resources in Xinjiang, Hu
and others suggested that the implementation of biological systems engineering was also a powerful
measure to protect water resources, which could improve the quality of water resources and improve
the aquatic environment [59].
Under the government’s institutional management, water resources can be further managed
through specific water resource allocation measures. Water conservancy projects are an important
measure to allocate water resources reasonably. Under the consciousness of protecting water resources,
China’s water conservancy projects have developed rapidly and can be used for flood control, water
supply, soil and water conservation, ecological environment protection, power generation and other
supporting projects and activities through the construction, expansion, reconstruction, enhancement,
and restoration of water conservancy projects [72]. Based on the research on the rational allocation
of water resources in Dongting Lake Basin, Li et al. proposed that water could be diverted from
wet areas to dry areas through water diversion projects, mainly to meet the needs of residents and
industry, but also for agricultural irrigation, to address the imbalance of spatial distribution of water
resources [60]. It is also possible to meet the seasonal needs of agricultural production and increase the
cultivated areas by constructing dams and reservoirs to change the distribution of water resources in
basins [72].
For the allocation of water resources to the entire basin and to address the severe water and
ecological problems in China’s inland river areas, Cheng et al. took the Heihe River Basin as the
research area to establish an integrated watershed model coupled with ecology, hydrology, and
socioeconomics, and put forward the key period for determining the ecological water demand, during
which the necessary amount of water should be guaranteed and the discharge of reservoirs and the
runoff of the river should be reasonably adjusted [42]. Fu et al. discussed the issue of the coordinated
distribution of water resources in the upper, middle, and lower reaches of river basins, and put forward
that the upper reaches are mainly ecological protection, the middle reaches are farmland development,
and the lower reaches are urban construction [73]. Measures like adjusting the industrial structure of
basins, properly controlling the pace of industrial and agricultural development, and accelerating the
development of tertiary industry are needed to allocate water resources [74]. In addition, Peng pointed
out that the mutual conversion and compensation relationship of surface water and groundwater and
constraints for the recoverable volume of groundwater during different periods in each node should
be fully taken into account to realize the unified allocation and joint dispatch of surface water and
groundwater by constructing a multi-objective programming model of water resource utilization in the
Yellow River Basin [75]. Cheng et al. considered the impact of trade between basins and the outside on
water resources, and proposed that the trade structure should be optimized to reduce the export of
virtual water [42].
agricultural water in basins needs to be reduced. Structural changes in water use were promoted, and
authors stated that the efficiency of water utilization and the output benefit of limited water resources
should be improved [76].
In short, the management of water resources in river basins needs to be carried out in three
respects: water resource protection, allocation, and utilization. Only when these three factors are
coordinated can the water resources be effectively managed. However, due to the large number
of watersheds in our country and their complicated conditions, there are still some problems in
our country’s current water resource management: (1) The water price control measures of water
resource management will lead to the increase of crop irrigation costs and the decrease of farmers’
income; the amount control of water resource management measures will lead to the reduction of
agricultural production scale, and farmers’ income will also be reduced. (2) How to ensure the fairness
of water allocation is a difficult problem when implementing water control measures. (3) There
are obvious differences in the water resource areas in our country, and the economic development
is not directly proportional to the supply of water resources. How to scientifically and effectively
manage the differences between the two and make the coordination of water resources and economic
development is a problem that current water resource management is faced with. (4) The water
resource management support system needs to be strengthened. Auxiliary systems such as geographic
information systems and management information systems are powerful technical tools for water
resource management, and need to be used jointly.
In view of the current research’s focus and deficiencies, it is necessary for our country’s future
basin water resource management to focus on the following aspects: (1) Water conservation. Basin
water resource management needs to take the ecological water demand in river basins into account.
When forecasting the demand of water, we should give priority to ensuring ecological water demand,
and then allocate production and living needs rationally. (2) Water resource allocation. Water price
should be considered as an important factor to establish the feedback relationship with other factors in
the water resources system, and to enrich and perfect the water supply and demand system model
in basins. Water resource management policies should be carried out based on water volume control
measures, then the water market mechanism should be established and the water rights trading system
improved. There is also a need to implement a virtual water strategy to mobilize social resources and
import water-intensive agricultural products to ease the shortage of water resources in the afflicted
areas. In addition, we should also explore the inter-basin resource combination and the comprehensive
management of water resources. (3) Water resource utilization. The tapping and saving of water
resources should be carried out simultaneously. Water conservation should be taken as a long-term
hard measure to build a water-saving social system.
(1) Impact of basin water resource protection on land use. In order to realize the protection
of water resources, increasing attention has been paid to ecological land [78]. The projects
of returning cropland to forest and grassland, grazing prohibition in mountains, increasing
the area of low-water-consumption shrubbery, closed forest land, other forest land and other
grassland, and reducing the sand area appropriately [79] are conducive to the promotion of
water eco-environmental protection in river basins. They are particularly beneficial to ensure
the construction of bioengineering and improve the service functions of water ecosystems
for water conservation and climate regulation [60]. All of these measures can optimize land
Water 2018, 10, 425 9 of 14
use and promote ecological restoration, wetland expansion, and urban greening. In addition,
the implementation of ecological water utilization will reduce the water consumption of other
types of land, leaving other land use patterns limited, and the impact of ecological water on land
use is very significant, especially in arid and semi-arid regions [77].
(2) Impact of basin water resource allocation on land use. As a whole, the allocation of water
resources should emphasize the ecological use of water, guarantee the living water for residents,
increase the industrial water, reduce the agricultural water, and realize the highly efficient
use of water resources [80]. The construction of water conservancy projects in the allocation
of water resources in river basins has an important impact on land use. According to a
study conducted by Gan Hong et al., water resource allocation has allocated part of the water
resources in the water-abundant areas to water-scarce areas through water diversion projects.
Large-scale construction of water conservancy projects directly causes changes in the land use
patterns and types, and the water resource regulation and distribution after the completion
of water conservancy projects will indirectly cause changes in land use structures and layouts.
Furthermore, the possible resettlement problems caused by water conservancy projects also have
important effects on the land use of moving-out areas and moving-in areas [77]. Based on the
study of the redistribution of water resources in the Heihe River Basin, Si Jianhua et al. proposed
that the rational allocation of water resources in basins could improve the water volume and
heighten the groundwater level downstream and repair the water ecosystems so as to optimize the
land use structures [81]. In addition, through establishing a water pricing management system,
China has accelerated the pace of water resource valuation and commercialization reform [82].
The commercialization of water resources is mainly reflected in the changes of water pricing
with the changes of supply and demand in the market, and the changes of water pricing will
inevitably lead to changes in land pricing [83]. Therefore, the water pricing management system
can promote the optimal allocation of urban land use, and can also increase the intensive use of
urban land. The intensive use of urban land can also reduce the impact of urban expansion on
agricultural land—especially the occupation of high-quality cultivated land [77]. At the same
time, the commercialization of water resources will also put our country’s weak agriculture and
food production in a disadvantaged situation in the future competition for water resources [84].
Therefore, farmland protection needs relevant agricultural laws and policies [85].
(3) The impact of basin water savings on land use. The implementation of water-saving measures will
also profoundly affect the type and intensity of land use. The use of water-saving technologies
in agriculture has not only promoted the improvement of land use efficiency but also enhanced
the intensification of land use [77]. As water resources become more constrained, limited water
resources can make more land available to agriculture in the process of production, and the
output per unit of agricultural land will also increase greatly. The areas under high water
consumption will be reduced, and drought-resistant crops planted areas will be increased.
The agricultural planting structures will also be adjusted accordingly [84]. In terms of industrial
water conservation, Huo comprehensively analyzed the characteristics of land and water
resources in Shaanxi province. He pointed out that due to the classification of industrial water,
ordinary factories and mines except for special industries all use poor-quality water or reclaimed
water. Additionally, the uniform provisions made to water-taking, water using, and technical rules
in industrial production processes through financial subsidies, relief, and other business-related
fees to restrict some high-water-consuming industries [86], so that its land-use have to take the
conversion due to high cost of water-saving input or water shortage [77].
development of basins. Although much research has been done on the management of water resources
in river basins in China, it is not yet systematic and the information provided to the managers is
extremely limited. In the future, the management of water resources in river basins in China may need
to be focused on the following aspects:
The classification system of aquatic ecosystem service functions in basins needs to be improved.
Ecosystem service functions are various and play an important role in human life. Different ecosystem
service functions have different effects on humans, and therefore the classification of ecosystem service
functions is the basis for understanding ecosystem services. As an important branch of ecosystem
service functions, the study of classification systems of aquatic ecosystem service functions is an
important foundation for further understanding aquatic ecosystems for water resource management.
At present, the classification system of ecosystem service functions is more comprehensive and
systematic, but the classification system for the service functions of watershed aquatic ecosystems
is not yet accomplished, the basis of division is not yet clear, and the relevant research needs to be
further strengthened.
The basin water market mechanism needs to be improved. In order to optimize the allocation of
water resources, improve the water utilization rate, scientifically carry out water resource management,
and solve the problems of water resources in basins, China has introduced and explored the water
market. Taking the economic value of water resources for social development into account, the water
market mainly refers to the water rights market and the water supply market. At the same time,
the ecological value of water resources cannot be ignored. The appropriate emission rights, wastewater
treatment, and wastewater reuse markets should be established. Practice has proved that China’s
current water market is not sufficient to deal with different water rights trading events in various
regions. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the rights to main bodies of water, establish and improve
China’s water right system, establish a water rights transfer mechanism that conforms to market rules,
and improve the water market mechanism to better manage Chinese basin water resources.
In the allocation and utilization of water resources, synthetic tradeoff should be given to the
development and protection. At present, the allocation and utilization of water resources mainly
depend on the needs of the social development of river basins. However, the ecological needs of
the river basins are often neglected, resulting in the duplication of efforts in the protection of water
resources in basins. Therefore, in the allocation and utilization of water resources, comprehensive
trade-off development, and protection are the focuses of most scholars.
Basin water resource management should be considered from a multidisciplinary perspective.
The crossed and comprehensive utilization of knowledge from watershed management science,
ecological science, geography science, and information science provides a powerful scientific support
for basin water resource management, so as to comprehensively manage water resources in basins,
repair basin water ecosystems and their service functions, and solve the basin water resource problems.
Acknowledgments: This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(Grant No. 71363061, 41501593).
Author Contributions: H.Z. and G.J. conceived and designed the experiments; H.Z. performed the experiments;
G.J. and Y.Y. analyzed the data; G.J. and H.Z. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Y.Y. and H.Z. wrote
the paper.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Xia, J.; Zhai, J.L.; Zhan, C.S. Some reflections on the research and development of water resources in China.
Adv. Earth Sci. 2011, 26, 905–915.
2. Li, F.; Sun, R.H.; Yang, L.R.; Chen, L.D. Assessment of freshwater ecosystem services in Beijing based on
demand and supply. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 21, 1146–1152. (In Chinese)
3. Schroter, D. Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 2005, 310,
1333–1337. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Water 2018, 10, 425 11 of 14
4. Zhang, L.; Lu, C.X.; Wu, Y.M.; Li, J.S.; Huang, Y.X.; Cheng, X.L. An overall development of water resources
for China’s rivers. J. Nat. Resour. 2014, 29, 295–303.
5. Ouyang, Z.Y.; Zhao, T.Q.; Wang, X.K.; Miao, H. Ecosystem services analyses and valuation of China terrestrial
surface water system. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2004, 24, 2091–2099.
6. Wang, H.; Wang, J.H. Sustainable utilization of China’s water resources. Bull. Chin. Acad. Sci. 2012, 27,
352–358. (In Chinese)
7. Meng, W.; Su, Y.B.; Zheng, B.H. Analysis of current situation of water pollution and its control strategy for
Chinese river basins. J. China Inst. Water Resour. Hydropower Res. 2004, 2, 8–12. (In Chinese)
8. Meng, W. The strategy of comprehensive pollution prevention and cure of water environment in Chinese
watershed. China Environ. Sci. 2007, 27, 712–716. (In Chinese)
9. Chen, X.Q.; Chen, J. Water resources allocation and integrated water resources management in the Yangtze
River basin. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2005, 14, 163–167. (In Chinese)
10. Daily, G.C. Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Pac. Conserv. Biol. 1997, 6, 220–221.
11. Ouyang, Z.Y.; Wang, R.S. Ecosystem services and their economic valuation. World Sci. Technol. Res. Dev.
2000, 10, 45–50.
12. Cai, Q.H.; Tang, T.; Deng, H.B. Discussion on freshwater ecosystem service and its evaluation index system.
Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2003, 14, 135–138. (In Chinese)
13. Bangash, R.F.; Passuello, A.; Sanchez-Canales, M.; Terrado, M.; López, A.; Elorza, F.J.; Ziv, G.; Acuña, V.;
Schuhmacher, M. Ecosystem services in Mediterranean river basin: Climate change impact on water
provisioning and erosion control. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 458–460, 246–255. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Song, W.; Deng, X.Z.; Yuan, Y.W.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.H. Impacts of land-use change on valued ecosystem service
in rapidly urbanized North China Plain. Ecol. Model. 2015, 318, 245–253. [CrossRef]
15. Costanza, R.; D’Arge, R.; Groot, R.D.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’Neill, R.V.;
Paruelo, J.; et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. World Environ. 1998, 25,
3–15. [CrossRef]
16. Aguirre, A.A. Biodiversity and Human Health; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2009; Volume 10,
pp. 101–102.
17. Ouyang, Z.Y.; Wang, X.K.; Miao, H. A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their
ecological-economic values. Acta Ecol. Sin. 1999, 19, 19–25.
18. Zhao, T.Q.; Ouyang, Z.Y.; Wang, X.K.; Miao, H.; Wei, Y.C. Ecosystem services and their valuation of terrestrial
surface water system in China. J. Nat. Resour. 2003, 18, 443–452.
19. Zhai, Y.J.; Liu, C.X. Evaluation of function of aquatic ecosystem and its economic value in Eighteen Creeks of
Cangshan. China Rural Water Hydropower 2015, 5, 77–80. (In Chinese)
20. Wang, H.; Han, S.; Deng, H.B.; Xiao, H.; Wu, G. A preliminary assessment on the Xiangxi River ecosystem
services. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2006, 26, 2971–2978.
21. Li, S.X.; Chen, L.; Huang, L.L.; Zhu, L. Evaluation of water ecosystem services of Tianmuhu New Town.
J. Econ. Water Resour. 2009, 27, 29–31, 35, 76.
22. Xie, G.D.; Zhen, L.; Lu, C.X.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, C. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem
services in China. J. Nat. Resour. 2008, 23, 911–919.
23. McCarthy, J.J.; Canziani, O.F.; Leary, N.A.; Dokken, D.J.; White, K.S. Climate change 2001: Impacts,
adaptation, and vulnerability. A contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Tidee 2007, 19, 81–111.
24. Parry, M.L.; Canziani, O.F.; Palutikof, J.P.; Linden, P.J.; Hanson, C.E. Contribution of Working Group II to the
Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Encycl. Lang. Linguist. 2007,
12, 171–175.
25. Marce, R.; Rodriguez-Arias, M.A.; Garcia, J.C.; Armengol, J. El Niño Southern Oscillation and climate trends
impact reservoir water quality. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2010, 16, 2857–2865. [CrossRef]
26. López-Moreno, J.I.; Vicente-Serrano, S.M.; Moran-Tejeda, E.; Zabalza, J.; Lorenzo-Lacruz, J.; Garćıa-Ruiz, J.M.
Impact of climate evolution and land use changes on water yield in the Ebro basin. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
2011, 15, 311–322. [CrossRef]
27. Zhou, C.Y.; Li, Y.Q.; Peng, J. The characteristics and variation of precipitation and water resource of Sichuan
and Chongqing basin on the eastern side of the plateau. Chin. J. Atmos. Sci. 2006, 30, 1217–1226. (In Chinese)
Water 2018, 10, 425 12 of 14
28. Vörösmarty, C.J.; Green, P.; Salisbury, J.; Lammers, R.B. Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate
change and population growth. Science 2000, 289, 284–288. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Alcamo, J.; Bennett, E.M. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment; Island Press:
Washington, DC, USA, 2003.
30. Iglesias, A.; Garrote, L.; Flores, F.; Moneo, M. Challenges to manage the risk of water scarcity and climate
change in the Mediterranean. J. Water Resour. Manag. 2007, 21, 775–788. [CrossRef]
31. Wang, Y.M.; Zhong-Wu, L.I.; Zeng, G.M. Research Progresses on Land Use and Land Cover Change as well
as Flood Disaster of Dongting Lake. Sichuan Environ. 2009, 28, 62–64. (In Chinese)
32. He, K.; Duan, C.Q.; Yang, S.M.; Ji, K.Q. Advances in hydrological and water resources response to land
use/cover change. J. Water Resour. Res. 2015, 4, 240–248. [CrossRef]
33. Li, L.J.; Jiang, D.J.; Li, J.Y.; Liang, L.Q.; Zhang, L. Advances in hydrological response to land use/land cover
change. J. Nat. Resour. 2007, 22, 211–224.
34. Foley, J.A.; Defries, R.; Asner, G.P.; Barford, C.; Bonan, G.; Carpenter, S.R.; Chapin, F.S.; Coe, M.T.; Daily, G.C.;
Gibbs, H.K.; et al. Global consequences of land use. Science 2005, 309, 570–574. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Deng, H.; Li, X.B.; Chen, J.; Zhang, M.; Wan, H. Simulation of hydrological response to land cover changes in
the Suomo basin. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2003, 15, 833–836.
36. Liu, M.L.; Tian, H.Q.; Chen, G.S.; Ren, W.; Zhang, C.; Liu, J.Y. Effects of land-use and land-cover change on
evapotranspiration and water yield in China during 1900–2000. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2008, 44,
1193–1207. [CrossRef]
37. Scanlon, B.R.; Reedy, R.C.; Stonestrom, D.A.; Prudic, D.E.; Dennehy, K.F. Impact of land use and land cover
change on groundwater recharge and quality in the southwestern US. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2005, 11, 1577–1593.
[CrossRef]
38. Hamilton, P.A.; Helsel, D.R. Effects of agriculture on ground-water quality in five regions of the United
States. Ground Water 2010, 33, 217–226. [CrossRef]
39. Pouget, L.; Escaler, I.; Guiu, R.; Mc, E.S.; Versini, P.A. Global change adaptation in water resources
management: The water change project. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 440, 186–193. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
40. Wang, L.; Zhu, X.; Han, D. Study of the ecosystems degradation and its driving mechanism based on
ecohydrological process evolution in Baiyangdian Lake Basin. Eng. Sci. 2010, 12, 36–40. (In Chinese)
41. Tullos, D.; Tullos, D.; Tilt, B.; Liermann, C.R. Assessing the influence of environmental impact assessments on
science and policy: An analysis of the Three Gorges Project. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 208–223. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
42. Cheng, G.D.; Xiao, H.L.; Fu, B.J. Advances in synthetic research on the eco-hydrological process of the Heihe
River Basin. Adv. Earth Sci. 2014, 29, 431–437. (In Chinese)
43. Torno, H.C. Computer Applications in Water Resources; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 1985.
44. Dudley, N.J. Irrigation planning: 4. Optimal interseasonal water allocation. Water Resour. Res. 1972, 8,
586–594. [CrossRef]
45. Argue, J.R. Towards a universal stormwater management practice for arid zone residential developments.
Water Sci. Technol. 1995, 32, 15–24.
46. Palmer, R.M.; Jones, C.; Walters, M. Environmental monitoring initiatives to sustain growth in Ontario,
Canada. Water Sci. Technol. 1998, 38, 113–122.
47. Bruce, J.P. Meteorology and Hydrology for Sustainable Development; World Meteorological Organization: Geneva,
Switzerland, 1992.
48. Afzal, J.; Noble, D.H.; Weatherhead, E.K. Optimization model for alternative use of different quality irrigation
waters. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 1992, 118, 218–228. [CrossRef]
49. Li, Y.; Zhou, J.; Kinzelbach, W.; Cheng, G.D.; Li, X.; Zhao, W.Z. Coupling a SVAT heat and water flow model,
a stomatal-photosynthesis model and a crop growth model to simulate energy, water and carbon fluxes in
an irrigated maize ecosystem. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2013, 176, 10–24. [CrossRef]
50. Ngana, J.O.; Mwalyosi, R.B.B.; Madulu, N.F.; Yanda, P.Z. Development of an integrated water resources
management plan for the Lake Manyara sub-basin, Northern Tanzania. Phys. Chem. Earth Parts A/B/C 2003,
28, 1033–1038. [CrossRef]
51. Huang, Y.H.; Zhang, Y.C. Application of differential dynamic programming and regression analysis in
reservoir optimization dispatching. Water Resour. Power 1986, 4, 315–322.
Water 2018, 10, 425 13 of 14
52. Lu, J.X. Decision-making model using expert systems for water resources system management with
multi-objects, multi-sources and multi-users. J. Nat. Resour. 1994, 9, 164–175.
53. Luo, Q.Y.; Tao, T.; Going, L.Y.; Xue, Z.S. Disposition of agricultural water resources in Yellow River Basin.
J. Arid Land Resour. Environ. 1994, 8, 1–6.
54. Liu, Z.H. Decision support system for water supply management in Drainage Basin. Arid Land Geogr. 2000,
23, 259–263.
55. Chen, X.H.; Chen, Y.Q.; Lai, G.Y. Optimal allocation of water resources in Dongjiang River Basin. J. Nat. Resour.
2002, 17, 366–372.
56. Wang, Y.L.; Wang, W.K.; Yang, Z.Y.; Wang, Z.; Qiao, X.Y.; Duan, L.; Ma, X.D.; Han, J.P. Study on rational
allocation and regulation of water resources for ecological environment in Weihe River basin of Shaanxi
Province. J. Arid Land Resour. Environ. 2005, 19, 14–21.
57. Yang, S.Q.; Liu, P.W. Strategy of water pollution prevention in Taihu Lake and its effects analysis. J. Great
Lakes Res. 2010, 36, 150–158. [CrossRef]
58. Xi, H.Y.; Feng, Q.; Si, J.H.; Chang, Z.Q.; Cao, S.K. Impacts of river recharge on groundwater level and
hydrochemistry in the lower reaches of Heihe River Watershed, northwestern China. Hydrogeol. J. 2009, 18,
791–801. [CrossRef]
59. Hu, W.Z. Discussing water rational development and utilization of water resources and water environmental
protection in Xinjiang. Environ. Protect. Xinjiang 1999, 21, 31–38. (In Chinese)
60. Li, J.Z.; Zhu, X.; Li, J.B.; Xu, M. Relationships between urbanization and water resource utilization in
Dongting Lake district of south-central China. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 24, 1677–1685. (In Chinese)
61. Zeng, L.X.; Xiao, W.F.; Huang, Z.L.; Lei, J.P.; Wang, P.C.; Tan, B.W. Relationship between environmental
factors and soil erosion with different pattern of returning farmland to forest in the Three Gorges Reservoir
Area. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2014, 23, 146–152. (In Chinese)
62. Chen, R.Z.; Sang, Y.F.; Wang, Z.G.; Li, Z.L. Influence of rich-poor precipitation on water resource allocation
of the Hanjiang-to-Weihe River Water Transfer Project. Resour. Sci. 2013, 35, 1577–1583. (In Chinese)
63. Cosgrove, W.J.; Rijsberman, F.R.; Council, W.W. World Water Vision: Making Water Everybody’s Business;
Earthscan: London, UK, 2000.
64. Abu-Allaban, M.; El-Naqa, A.; Jaber, M.; Hammouri, N. Water scarcity impact of climate change in semi-arid
regions: A case study in Mujib basin, Jordan. Arab. J. Geosci. 2015, 8, 951–959. [CrossRef]
65. Xia, J. A brief introduction to the research on the sustainability of foreign water resources system.
Water Resour. Electr. Power 1996, 23, 1–8.
66. Fu, G.W.; Guo, J.F. A discussion about sustainable water resources management. Urban Environ. Urban Ecol.
1997, 10, 8–12.
67. Baumol, W.J.; Oates, W.E. The Theory of Environmental Policy; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY,
USA, 1988; Volume 27, pp. 127–128.
68. Molle, F. Water scarcity, prices and quotas: A review of evidence on irrigation volumetric pricing.
Irrig. Drain. Syst. 2009, 23, 43–58. [CrossRef]
69. Vos, J.; Vincent, L. Volumetric water control in a large-scale open canal irrigation system with many
smallholders: The case of Chancay-Lambayeque in Peru. Agric. Water Manag. 2011, 98, 705–714. [CrossRef]
70. Zhang, J.L. Barriers to water markets in the Heihe River basin in northwest China. Agric. Water Manag. 2007,
87, 32–40. [CrossRef]
71. Wang, Y.H. An evaluation on the institutional reforms of water pricing, water right and water market in
China. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2007, 17, 153–158. (In Chinese)
72. Liu, J.G.; Zang, C.F.; Tian, S.Y.; Liu, J.G.; Yang, H.; Jia, S.F.; You, L.Z.; Liu, B.; Zhang, M. Water conservancy
projects in China: Achievements, challenges and way forward. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2013, 23, 633–643.
[CrossRef]
73. Fu, B.J. Geography: From knowledge, science to decision making support. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2017, 72, 1–10.
(In Chinese)
74. Wang, S.J. On allocation of water resources in arid region of Uygur Autonomous Region of Xinjiang for
sustainable utilization. J. Econ. Water Resour. 2006, 26, 4–7. (In Chinese)
75. Peng, S.M.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, X.H.; Yang, L.B. Multi-objective planning model for water resources
sustainable utilization of Yellow River Basin. J. Hohai Univ. 2007, 35, 153–158. (In Chinese)
Water 2018, 10, 425 14 of 14
76. Wang, X.J.; Shi, M.J.; Wang, L. Solutions to water scarcity in arid regions: Effectiveness of water demand
management policy. J. Nat. Resour. 2013, 28, 1117–1129.
77. Gan, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, X. Analysis of the correlativity between regional land use change and water resources
optimal use. J. Nanjing Normal Univ. 2003, 48, 1500–1503.
78. Zhang, S.Y.; Yang, L.; Chen, G.P. Definition of ecological water and its application tactics in Northwest Arid
area. Arid Land Geogr. 2001, 24, 277–282.
79. Zhang, R.H. Reasonable usage issues of water resource in arid and semi-arid areas of West China. Bull. Soil
Water Conserv. 2003, 23, 78–81.
80. Duan, Y.Y.; Liu, U.L. Optimization of land use structure based on water resources carrying capacity in
Minqin Oasis, Gansu, China. J. Desert Res. 2011, 31, 174–179.
81. Si, J.H.; Wang, Y.B.; Feng, Q.; Zhai, L.X. The changes of LUCC in Ejina Oasis after water resources
redistribution in Heihe River. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Remote Sensing 2011,
Nanjing, China, 24–26 June 2011; Volume 10, pp. 6451–6454.
82. Liu, Y.S.; Wu, C.J. Situation of land-water resources and analysis of sustainable food security in China.
J. Nat. Resour. 2002, 17, 270–275.
83. Ma, J.Q.; Xia, J.; Liu, X.; Liu, J. Comparison between irrigation water prices in China and Australia and the
policy reform of water price in China. Resour. Sci. 2009, 31, 1529–1534.
84. Yao, H.R.; Zheng, D.; Wu, S.H. Optimum allocation of land and water in the typical sand regions around
Beijing: A case study in Huailai County. Geogr. Res. 2002, 1, 4–11.
85. Wang, X.F.; Feng, Q.; You, Q.G.; Qiu, X.L. Thinkings on reform of agricultural water price. J. Econ.
Water Resour. 2014, 32, 50–53. (In Chinese)
86. Huo, Y.G. Disposition in water resources and industrial layout and distribution in Shaanxi Province.
J. Xidian Univ. 1999, 9, 7–12. (In Chinese)
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).