Metabolic Profiling of CHO Cells During The Production of Biotherapeutics
Metabolic Profiling of CHO Cells During The Production of Biotherapeutics
Metabolic Profiling of CHO Cells During The Production of Biotherapeutics
Review
Metabolic Profiling of CHO Cells during the Production
of Biotherapeutics
Mathilde Coulet 1,2 , Oliver Kepp 2,3 , Guido Kroemer 2,3,4, * and Stéphane Basmaciogullari 1, *
generate diverse functional recombinant glycoproteins, with Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO)
cells being used for the production of 84% of FDA-approved biotherapeutics in 2018 [2].
The culture of CHO cells in bioreactors is a tightly regulated process that has seen
significant advances since the 90s [3]. The steps involved in the development of a cell culture
production process include the design and the selection of a stable protein-secreting cell line,
the optimization of media and culture operating conditions at a small scale using medium-
to high-throughput screening methods and finally the upscaling of the process, which must
comply with good manufacturing practices (GMPs) [4,5]. Despite major advances in cell
culture processes and the optimization of cell culture media, the cellular response to changes
in the culture environment and the subsequent impact on cell growth and productivity needs
to be better understood in order to fully optimize the production of biologics.
In this regard, multidimensional ‘omics’ approaches are powerful tools used to im-
prove our knowledge and to design suitable strategies for unlocking the full potential
of CHO cells. Genomics, proteomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics are recent and
complementary fields of study that have been instrumental in deciphering biological mech-
anisms influencing cell growth in bioreactors. Metabolomics is a promising approach in
the bioproduction field, as it detects the downstream products of the other ‘omics’ sciences
(genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics for the characterization of DNA, RNA and
proteins/enzymes, respectively) and is believed to accurately mirror the cellular pheno-
type. Metabolomics involves the intracellular and extracellular quantification of small
molecules called metabolites [6], concentrations of which strongly vary as a function of
cellular responses to environmental changes [7]. The standardized preparation of the sam-
ples, be it debris-free culture supernatants or washed cells, is the first step of metabolomic
analysis. This is followed by the metabolic profiling of the samples either by nuclear
magnetic resonance (NMR) or mass spectrometry (MS). A bioinformatic analysis then
connects metabolites to known metabolic pathways and quantifies metabolic fluxes [8,9].
Two distinct methodologies called untargeted and targeted metabolomics are widely used
for this purpose. Untargeted metabolomics is an unbiased analysis measuring all detectable
metabolites present in the sample and can enable the discovery of new molecules impacting
cell metabolism. Targeted metabolomics focuses on groups of known metabolites that are
chemically defined. Both methods are complementary and are often used in combination to
gain maximum insights [10]. Metabolomics analysis can also be coupled with the metabolic
labeling of the cell substrate by adding non-radioactive isotope tracers (usually synthetic
metabolites labelled with carbon-13, 13 C) to the culture media prior to mass spectrometry
analysis. This combined approach allows for metabolic flux analysis (MFA) and the calcula-
tion of reaction rates as well as the identification of precursor–product relationships among
metabolites [11].
The kinetic analysis of the metabolome of cells at different time points of the cell
culture is key to the improvement of processes. This is particularly true for the detection
of the appearance and/or exhaustion of potential fate-changing molecules at the switch
from the exponential growth phase to the stationary phase, which is characterized by low
proliferation, and the final decline of the culture, which is characterized by a high rate of cell
death. Many studies managed to identify such markers [11–19] and this paved the way for
an increase in production yield through the genetic engineering of cells or by changing the
medium composition and culture parameters [20–22]. However, the metabolomic studies
reported in the literature are heterogeneous in their design and technology (Supplementary
Table S1), rendering the direct comparison of results difficult.
This review aimed to discuss the results obtained by mass spectrometry metabolomics
and 13 C MFA studies of CHO cells listed in Supplementary Table S1. Key results ob-
tained for each phase of growth (exponential growth, stationary phase, decline) regarding
catabolism and anabolism are presented. Emphasis is placed on the main metabolic path-
ways of mammalian cells (glycolysis, the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) and the tricar-
boxylic acid (TCA) cycle) and on the families of biomolecules that impact these pathways
(nucleotides, amino acids, lipids and energy-rich molecules). Key changes marking the
Cells 2022, 11, x 3 of 20
Figure 1.
Figure 1. Global view of
Global view of the
the central
central CHO
CHO cell
cell metabolism
metabolism at
at the
the exponential
exponential phase
phase of
of growth.
growth.
Cells 2022, 11, 1929 4 of 21
2.1. Carbon Source Catabolism Generates Energy for the Cells as Nutrients Are Largely Available (Step 1)
MFA studies have shown that glucose contributes to 70% of the total carbon influx,
while pyruvate from medium serves as an additional carbon source at the beginning of the
culture, with 80% of it being consumed in the first day of culture [18,19]. Similarly, another
study concluded that glucose represents 65% of the entering carbon, with 10% coming from
glutamine and 25% from other amino acids [23]. A lower contribution was also reported
(40–50%) [24,25], although this can partly be explained by the fact that glucose consumption
can vary simply due to different culture conditions, specifically, in the present case, culture
volumes [26]. Besides these subtle differences, publications overall agree on the fact that
glucose constitutes the main carbon source for growth.
Glucose taken up by cells can be phosphorylated and supplied to the glycolysis path-
way for ATP production or to the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), which contributes to
redox homeostasis and biosynthesis. Numerous studies report that during the exponential
phase, glucose is mainly oxidized via glycolysis, which results in the formation of pyruvate.
A significant portion of the pyruvate formed is converted into lactate, which is secreted
and acidifies the medium, resulting in growth inhibition, with the rest being used to supply
the TCA cycle [11,16,19,23,24,26–37]. This metabolic state was previously recognized as the
Warburg effect and characterizes cancer cells that consume high levels of glucose. Based
on the potential energy load of glucose, it can be considered that, in the sense, the carbon
flux is “wasted” by the cells, in that it is not targeted to the TCA and yields high lactate
levels instead. This lowers the production of the C4-6 precursors necessary for biomass
generation [38,39].
It has been estimated that 75% of glucose consumption goes toward lactate production
in cultures of adherent and suspension-growing CHO cells [11,33,40]. In perfusion cultures,
however, a more balanced proportion has been measured, with 55% of the pyruvate being
estimated to generate lactate and 45% entering the TCA cycle [32]. On the contrary, MFA
studies on batch/fed-batch cultures report that 25–40% of cytosolic pyruvate is converted
into lactate by the action of lactate dehydrogenase, an effect that is observed for both CHO
WT cells and protein-producing CHO derivatives [18,23,41], while 50–60% of the pyruvate
pool is channeled into the TCA cycle. These discrepancies might be attributed to different
media compositions. For instance, it has been shown that glutamine provided in the media
can strongly influence glucose and pyruvate metabolism [42]. It was also shown that the
overexpression of bcl2, an anti-apoptotic gene, can influence the proportion of pyruvate
entering the TCA and, as a result, lactate formation [34]. A number of studies also analyzed
the differences between high and low producer clones. Certain studies revealed that
(i) high producers possess higher levels of intracellular NADH, suggesting a higher level
of glycolysis in combination with the TCA cycle and/or oxidative phosphorylation [43],
and (ii) some differences exist in the timing of glucose consumption and lactate formation
between high and low producer cell lines, with high producers consuming lactate earlier
in the culture compared to low producers [19]. Only minor differences were reported in
another study, suggesting that further investigations are needed to clarify how productivity
might be correlated to the early phases of glucose metabolism [44].
At the pyruvate branch point, it was estimated that about 75% of pyruvate comes
from glycolysis, while 25% results from the conversion of malate by the malic enzyme and
a minor fraction from the degradation of amino acids such as serine or cysteine [40–42].
A total of 90% of pyruvate flux would enter in the TCA following its conversion to acetyl-
coA, with the remaining 10% entering the TCA cycle after conversion into oxaloacetate by
pyruvate carboxylase [32,33,42].
At the late exponential phase, a decrease by one-third in terms of glucose consumption
and glycolytic activity was measured in favor of lactate uptake [18,37]. Interestingly, it was
possible to prolong the exponential phase by the adding pyruvate and amino acids to the
medium [16].
The pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) represents an alternative route of glucose oxida-
tion that regenerates the NADPH that contributes to the redox balance in the cytoplasm and
Cells 2022, 11, 1929 5 of 21
reported consistent percentages in terms of the contributions of amino acid to TCA cycle
replenishment, with glutamine being the main carbon source, and it is known that its
availability in the culture media, together with asparagine or serine, has a high impact on
the metabolism of CHO cells [25,50,51]. Glutamine was found to contribute to about 40%
of the total carbon supply of the TCA cycle. The mitochondrial glutamate pool originates
from both the transport of cytosolic glutamate into the mitochondria and from the transport
of glutamine into the mitochondria followed by hydrolysis to glutamate. Glutamate is
converted into α-ketoglutarate by the mitochondrial glutamate dehydrogenase, which is
fed into the TCA cycle [23]. All the other amino acids contribute about 10% and enter the
TCA cycle at either the acetyl-CoA, α-ketoglutarate or oxaloacetate branch point. Very
similar amino acid catabolic contributions were reported in induced and non-induced
cells [41]. For low and high producer clones, consistent results were also observed, with
asparagine and glutamine generating about 30% of the citrate pool and 50% of malate and
succinate labelling, suggesting their major role in ATP generation and the replenishment of
the TCA cycle at the exponential phase of growth but not biomass production [19]. The
total contribution of amino acids together with glucose to incoming carbon flux is thought
to remain constant over the entire culture (between 30% and 50% of the total carbon) with
the uptake of other amino acids increasing after glutamine is depleted [18]. Another model
estimated that 35% of the central carbon metabolism is fed by amino acid catabolism,
with glutamine representing 10% [23]. More precisely, 60% of the aspartate formed was
transaminated to yield oxaloacetate during exponential growth, decreasing to 50% in the
stationary phase. Alanine was produced for nitrogen detoxification in the exponential
phase, corresponding to 6% of pyruvate usage. On average, 25% of the essential amino acids
consumed were not supplied for biomass or IgG production during exponential growth
and instead generated TCA cycle intermediates [44]. This interpretation is supported by a
second study in which the rate of glutamine uptake during the early exponential phase
greatly exceeded the biosynthetic demand for biomass or antibody production, which
reflects its use in catabolic energy production [18].
A study comparing cultures fed with high or low concentrations of glutamine showed
the importance of this metabolite, as major differences in pathway fluxes were observed.
These variations impacted strongly on the specific productivity, which was 2-fold higher
for cultures fed with low concentrations of glutamine, and showed how sensitive CHO cell
metabolism is to glutamine levels [42].
The replenishment of the TCA by amino acids generates intermediate molecular
species. At the end of the exponential phase, when cell density is high and lactate concen-
tration is low, these intermediates tend to accumulate, and their inhibitory effect on cell
growth has been demonstrated, with indole 3-carboxylate and isovalerate being the most
potent (refer to Tables 1–3 for more details) [21].
In addition to their role in the replenishment of the TCA and protein biosynthesis,
amino acids serve as glutathione precursors. Their metabolism thus has a major impact on
cell protection against oxidative stress caused by ROS [54]. In this respect, glutathione is
one of the key metabolites to consider, as the equilibrium between its oxidized (GSSG) and
reduced (GSH) forms influences cell growth. Both forms are present at high concentrations
during the early exponential phase at a 1:5 ratio. The GSSG/GSH ratio is then balanced
during the exponential phase [31,55]. Consistently, several publications reported the accu-
mulation of GSSG in media during the exponential growth phase, which then continued
during the stationary phase. GSSG is known to be a marker of oxidative stress and to
induce apoptosis, presumably explaining its correlation with caspase activity [12,17,20,47].
An intracellular decrease in GSSG and GSH concentrations has also been reported [17,18].
This is consistent with the accumulation of GSSG observed in media as it is excreted by
cells, and extracellular GSSG might then account for cell death in prolonged cultures [38].
Additionally, it has been suggested that the decrease in GSH concentration observed during
the late exponential phase together with the decrease in NADPH concentration triggers an
increase in PPP activity before the peak of TCA cycle fluxes. In favor of this hypothesis,
Cells 2022, 11, 1929 7 of 21
a close correlation between PPP and TCA activities was observed during the culture [18].
Based on a study focused on the redox status in the cell, it has also been suggested that cell
ageing is not responsible for the increase in glutathione metabolism and ROS management,
but that high cell densities are [54].
Table 1. Amino acids and amino acid derivatives at the exponential phase.
Table 1. Cont.
Table 1. Cont.
Table 1. Cont.
Table 2. Amino acids and amino acid derivatives at the stationary phase.
Table 2. Cont.
Table 3. Amino acids and amino acids derivatives at the decline phase.
Table 3. Cont.
3. The Stationary Phase: Stabilized Growth and High Recombinant Protein Production
3.1. Alternative Carbon Source Catabolism Enables Energy Production and Cell Maintenance
As a general trend, most of the carbon and nitrogen sources were found to be consumed at
lower rates during the stationary phase compared to the exponential phase [34,40,44]. Thus, a
5-fold decrease in glycolytic activity was reported to be accompanied by an equivalent reduction
in glutaminolysis and AKG production [33]. The stationary phase also witnesses a major shift
in the metabolism of lactate, which is not so much produced but consumed, enabling TCA
cycle replenishment, as the glucose concentration decreases [11,16–18,31,33,34,44,56]. Glucose
consumption continues, even though at a decreased rate, until it is fully depleted [11,27,41,44].
One report, namely [18], indicated a slight decrease in glutaminolysis, while glucose fluxes do
not drop below 50% of their initial rate. A decrease in glucose consumption and glycolysis fluxes
by one-third was observed at the late exponential phase and the stationary phase [18]. These
key characteristics were also observed for antibody-producing GS-NS0 mouse myeloma cells.
In such cells, lactate was consumed earlier when proliferation was artificially stopped, which
also correlated with increased productivity [28]. Evidence was provided that glucose is not
depleted during the stationary phase but at the entry in the decline phase [16]. The depletion of
asparagine and aspartate was reported to occur at the entry into the stationary phase, well before
the exhaustion of glucose. Moreover, pyruvate was identified as a growth-limiting metabolite,
meaning that its depletion marks the transition from the exponential to the stationary phase [44].
The depletion of pyruvate was confirmed in a more recent study [31].
PPP fluxes increase during the stationary phase compared to the exponential phase by
a factor of 5 to 6-fold, corresponding to 30% of the glucose uptake rate [11,33] or possibly
even more [13,18,34]. Sengupta et al. hypothesized that during the stationary phase,
cells might experience more oxidative stress, leading to a higher utilization of the PPP
to generate NADPH for reductive reactions. This is supported by a study on Escherichia
coli that showed that the bacteria fail to fight oxidative stress during the stationary phase
because of the downregulation of genes involved in aerobic electron transport [57]. One
recent report showed that the downregulation of the PPP, as opposed to its activation,
occurred during the stationary phase in CHO cells [31], but this relationship has not been
extensively studied in CHO cells and deserves further investigation.
Most studies agree that succinate, malate, citrate and fumarate accumulate during
the stationary phase in the culture supernatant [12,20,27,46,58]. At this stage, carbon
influx into the TCA cycle is provided by glucose (50%), glutamine (40%) and other amino
acids (10%) entering the TCA cycle in the form of acetyl-CoA or anaplerotic substrates
including malate, α-ketoglutarate or oxaloacetate [41]. More importantly, a switch in
pyruvate utilization is observed from lactate production and secretion to its translocation
into the mitochondria and use in the TCA cycle, which reaches its peak activity [13,18,34].
Such TCA cycle activation may be secondary to exacerbated oxidative stress, resulting in a
decreased NADH/NAD+ ratio and the consequent counter regulation of the regeneration
of the NADH pool.
In addition to the publications that report the increased activity of the TCA cycle in
the stationary phase, equivalent or decreased activity has also been reported. For example,
MFA performed on adherent CHO cells during the stationary phase led to the conclusion
that most of the pyruvate is diverted to the TCA cycle (instead of yielding lactate), with
no impact on the TCA cycle, which operates at similar levels as during the exponential
phase [11,33]. This was also observed in a study using 1 H-NMR, where the secretion of
succinate, malate, citrate and fumarate were found to represent the same proportion of the
TCA cycle flux as during the exponential phase. This indicates that in these models, the
TCA is operating at close-to-maximum enzymatic capacity throughout the culture time [44].
In other studies, the activities of glutamate dehydrogenase and pyruvate carboxylase, key
anaplerotic enzymes, were found to be reduced 2-fold, and the flux from α-ketoglutarate
to succinyl-CoA was also lowered to 50% [11,33]. Such decreased TCA cycle activity has
also been observed in other works [16,17] and led to the conclusion that glucose might be
redirected to other metabolic pathways to enable ATP generation and NADPH oxidation
Cells 2022, 11, 1929 16 of 21
in the stationary phase, during which proliferation is limited and productivity is increased
(see below).
Regarding amino acids, observations made during the stationary phase of growth
are reported in Table 3. According to a number of studies, anaplerosis might be strongly
decreased during the stationary phase compared to exponential phase, resulting in 3-
fold lower malic enzyme fluxes and negligible fluxes of amino acids toward the TCA
cycle [11,13]. However, another more recent study estimated that the consumption of
essential amino acids for anaplerosis increases from 25% during the exponential phase
to 35% during the stationary phase, pointing to the key role of amino acids in energy
production throughout the culture [44]. These conflicting results demonstrate that cell
metabolism across culture phases might be model and clone dependent.
be explained by the fact that the former study was focused on an early phase of decline
while the latter was focused on a terminal phase of decline and medium exhaustion.
Regarding nucleotide metabolism, ATP, ADP and AMP concentrations decreased with
the culture time until the decline phase, but their distributions across the cytoplasmic and
mitochondrial compartments differed. The ATP concentration was found to be higher in
the cytosol than in the mitochondria during this culture phase, unlike in the cases of ADP
and AMP, which were found at similar concentrations in both compartments [30].
Regarding amino acids, observations made during the decline phase are reported in
Table 3 There is no comprehensive analysis of fatty acid metabolism during the decline phase,
but a peak of medium and long chain fatty acid concentrations was reported at this phase [31].
Finally, regarding the oxidative state of the cell, an increase in oxidized glutathione was
observed, leading to an unfavorable GSSG/GSH ratio for ROS management [31].
In addition to a comprehensive understanding of cell metabolism during the decline
phase, which needs further investigation, several strategies have been suggested to extend
the productive phase of the cell suspension. For example, one study recommended the
growing of cells in galactose-containing medium, as it is metabolized when glucose is
depleted, which enables the maintenance of cell viability [59]. Another study suggested
the addition of an anti-apoptotic agent to avoid excessive cell death [46].
5. Conclusions
The comparison of all of the metabolomic studies on CHO cells reveals general trends for
each of the phases of cell cultures, as they highlight the most important shifts from expansion
to stabilization and then to final viable cell density decline. Overall, the exponential phase
of growth corresponds to a state of high consumption in terms of nutrients, in particular
glucose and glutamine. This enables high anabolic activity, a balanced redox state and the
formation of excess energy that can be utilized for biomass production, favoring intense
cell proliferation. The oxidation of glucose via glycolysis is high, enabling bioenergetic
homeostasis and energy “storage” by means of lactate production, contrasting with the
moderate pyruvate-mediated fueling of the TCA cycle, which is instead replenished by
anaplerosis due to the availability of all amino acids. A characteristic of the growth phase is
low mAb production, which makes the subsequent stationary phase the most interesting with
regard to the synthesis of recombinant proteins. This reduced proliferation enables a higher
investment in cellular energy for biosynthesis. The stationary phase is characterized by a
comparably low consumption of carbon and nitrogen sources and reduced glycolytic activity.
In contrast, TCA cycle fluxes are increased during this phase, with lactate consumption
supplying the acetyl-CoA pool. In this phase, the role of amino acids in TCA replenishment
deserves further investigation. Also, compared to the exponential phase, PPP is largely
activated and thus generates reducing equivalents such as NADPH and glutathione, which
fight oxidative stress during the stationary phase. The final decline of cultures is marked by
the exhaustion of many metabolites and the accumulation of toxic products.
Importantly, this review also highlights important discrepancies between results from
various studies. These discrepancies may be explained by the unique features of the CHO
cell lines derived from a single host, acquired by genetic drift in separate laboratories [60].
Differences in terms of the media used and the culture strategies have also shown to give
rise to genetic and epigenetic diversity, and this could explain phenotypic differences when
distinct processes are used for the production from the same clone [61,62]. This diversity is
known to have a major impact on the metabolomic profile of CHO culture.
For instance, principal component analysis performed on cell culture supernatants of
six mAbs producing cell lines derived from two distinct hosts highlighted that variations
in metabolic profiles were highly dependent on the cell line’s host lineage [22]. When com-
paring the metabolic profile of high and low producer clones, key differences were also
identified [19,43]. In the first study, Chong et al. [43] identified seven metabolites involved
in the main metabolic pathways of CHO cells (glycolysis, the PPP and the TCA cycle), as-
sociated with high productivity. It was suggested that the abundance of these metabolites
Cells 2022, 11, 1929 18 of 21
improved the control of the oxidative state, thus increasing the production of recombinant
mAb. Furthermore, Dean et al. [19] highlighted several metabolic differences between high
and low producers’ cell lines. The low producer clone consumed more glucose at the start of
the culture, while accumulating less lactate. In addition, more than 50% of the intracellular
lactate originated from extracellular pyruvate in the high producer clone, whereas it repre-
sented only 30% in the low producer clone. After four days of culture, the high producer
was able to consume the accumulated lactate, which was not the case for the low producer.
More importantly, TCA metabolites were replenished from glucose in high producer clones,
suggesting increased activity in terms of the TCA cycle, likely representing a hallmark of high
production [19,63]. It was consistently shown that the production of the recombinant protein
correlated with a more efficient utilization of glucose for the TCA cycle [41].
Specific gene silencing or over-expression was also shown to alter cell metabolism.
For example, the endogenous expression level of the bcl-2 anti-apoptotic gene [34] or the
overexpression of malate dehydrogenase II [20] resulted in diminished lactate accumulation
and decreased NADH abundancy when compared with control cells.
Finally, the diversity in terms of media formulation across the studies referenced in
this review might explain some of the discrepancies identified. For instance, the peak
lactate concentration can be decreased by the use of a chemically defined CHO medium
when compared to a chemically defined hybridoma medium [64]. It was also shown
that maintaining glucose concentrations to almost negligible levels in HiPDOG cultures
enabled the maintenance of lactate, osmolarity and ammonia below inhibitory levels [21].
Similarly, the concentration of glutamine, another major carbon source for cells, in the
culture medium was shown to have a major impact on the CHO metabolic states [42]. In
low glutamine-containing medium, glycolytic fluxes were significantly increased while
PPP was decreased 2-fold when compared to cultures growing in high glutamine medium.
Pyruvate usage by the TCA cycle instead of lactate production was more important in low
glutamine medium cultures, which was also observed by Kirsch et al. [25]. An increase
in TCA flux in such culture conditions was also reported in other studies, including in
CHO-DHFR cells [50].
Nevertheless, the comparison of results obtained by MS metabolomics and 13 C MFA
to results obtained using other methods can be an efficient strategy when used to improve
our knowledge of CHO cells metabolism and identify main trends. Future investigation
must address the cause–effect relationships between metabolic shifts and mAb production
yields. This could be achieved by connecting information obtained on experiments using
several “omics” tools beyond metabolomics such as genomics, epigenomics, transcrip-
tomics and proteomics [65]. Moreover, the increasing availability of single-cell “omics”
may increase our knowledge of individual cells, thus allowing for a refined analysis of
likely heterogeneous cell populations, eventually improving clone selection.
Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https:
//www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells11121929/s1, Table S1: Comparison of metabolomic studies
of CHO cells.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization: M.C., S.B. Review literature: M.C. Writing—original draft
preparation: M.C., S.B. Writing—review and editing: all authors. Prepared figures: M.C. Supervision:
S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: M.C. is supported by a grant from the French ANRT agency (CIFRE No 2020/0106). O.K.
received funding from the Institut National du Cancer (INCa) and the DIM ELICIT initiative of the
Ile de France. G.K. is supported by the Ligue contre le Cancer (équipe labellisée); Agence National de
la Recherche (ANR)—Projets blancs; AMMICa US23/CNRS UMS3655; Association pour la Recherche
sur le Cancer (ARC); Cancéropôle Ile-de-France; Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM);
a donation by Elior; Equipex Onco-Pheno-Screen; European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases
(EJPRD); Gustave Roussy Odyssea, the European Union Horizon 2020 Projects Oncobiome and
Crimson; Fondation Carrefour; Institut National du Cancer (INCa); Institut Universitaire de France;
LabEx Immuno-Oncology (ANR-18-IDEX-0001); a Cancer Research ASPIRE Award from the Mark
Cells 2022, 11, 1929 19 of 21
Foundation; the RHU Immunolife; Seerave Foundation; SIRIC Stratified Oncology Cell DNA Repair
and Tumor Immune Elimination (SOCRATE); and SIRIC Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine
(CARPEM). This study contributes to the IdEx Université de Paris ANR-18-IDEX-0001.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Acknowledgments: We acknowledge Christine DeMaria, Henry Lin and Shawn Barrett at Sanofi for
a critical review of the manuscript. The graphical abstract was created with BioRender.com, accessed
on 2 June 2022.
Conflicts of Interest: G.K. received research support by Sanofi. M.C. and S.B. are full-time employees
of Sanofi.
References
1. Singh, S.; Kumar, N.K.; Dwiwedi, P.; Charan, J.; Kaur, R.; Sidhu, P.; Chugh, V.K. Monoclonal Antibodies: A Review. Curr. Clin.
Pharmacol. 2018, 13, 85–99. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Walsh, G. Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2018. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 1136–1145. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Kunert, R.; Reinhart, D. Advances in recombinant antibody manufacturing. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 3451–3461.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Li, F.; Vijayasankaran, N.; Shen, A.Y.; Kiss, R.; Amanullah, A. Cell culture processes for monoclonal antibody production. MAbs
2010, 2, 466–479. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Ritacco, F.V.; Wu, Y.; Khetan, A. Cell culture media for recombinant protein expression in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells:
History, key components, and optimization strategies. Biotechnol. Prog. 2018, 34, 1407–1426. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Oliver, S.G.; Winson, M.K.; Kell, D.B.; Baganz, F. Systematic functional analysis of the yeast genome. Trends Biotechnol. 1998, 16,
373–378. [CrossRef]
7. Zhang, A.; Sun, H.; Xu, H.; Qiu, S.; Wang, X. Cell metabolomics. Omics A J. Integr. Biol. 2013, 17, 495–501. [CrossRef]
8. León, Z.; García-Cañaveras, J.C.; Donato, M.T.; Lahoz, A. Mammalian cell metabolomics: Experimental design and sample
preparation. Electrophoresis 2013, 34, 2762–2775. [CrossRef]
9. Cuperlović-Culf, M.; Barnett, D.A.; Culf, A.S.; Chute, I. Cell culture metabolomics: Applications and future directions. Drug
Discov. Today 2010, 15, 610–621. [CrossRef]
10. Roberts, L.D.; Souza, A.L.; Gerszten, R.E.; Clish, C.B. Targeted metabolomics. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2012, 98, 30–32. [CrossRef]
11. Ahn, W.S.; Antoniewicz, M.R. Metabolic flux analysis of CHO cells at growth and non-growth phases using isotopic tracers and
mass spectrometry. Metab. Eng. 2011, 13, 598–609. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Chong, W.P.; Goh, L.T.; Reddy, S.G.; Yusufi, F.N.; Lee, D.Y.; Wong, N.S.; Heng, C.K.; Yap, M.G.; Ho, Y.S. Metabolomics profiling
of extracellular metabolites in recombinant Chinese Hamster Ovary fed-batch culture. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 23,
3763–3771. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Sengupta, N.; Rose, S.T.; Morgan, J.A. Metabolic flux analysis of CHO cell metabolism in the late non-growth phase. Biotechnol.
Bioeng. 2011, 108, 82–92. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Sellick, C.A.; Croxford, A.S.; Maqsood, A.R.; Stephens, G.M.; Westerhoff, H.V.; Goodacre, R.; Dickson, A.J. Metabolite profiling of
CHO cells: Molecular reflections of bioprocessing effectiveness. Biotechnol. J. 2015, 10, 1434–1445. [CrossRef]
15. Karst, D.J.; Steinhoff, R.F.; Kopp, M.R.G.; Serra, E.; Soos, M.; Zenobi, R.; Morbidelli, M. Intracellular CHO Cell Metabolite Profiling
Reveals Steady-State Dependent Metabolic Fingerprints in Perfusion Culture. Biotechnol. Prog. 2017, 33, 879–890. [CrossRef]
16. Sellick, C.A.; Croxford, A.S.; Maqsood, A.R.; Stephens, G.; Westerhoff, H.V.; Goodacre, R.; Dickson, A.J. Metabolite profiling of
recombinant CHO cells: Designing tailored feeding regimes that enhance recombinant antibody production. Biotechnol. Bioeng.
2011, 108, 3025–3031. [CrossRef]
17. Selvarasu, S.; Ho, Y.S.; Chong, W.P.; Wong, N.S.; Yusufi, F.N.; Lee, Y.Y.; Yap, M.G.; Lee, D.Y. Combined in silico modeling and
metabolomics analysis to characterize fed-batch CHO cell culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 1415–1429. [CrossRef]
18. Templeton, N.; Dean, J.; Reddy, P.; Young, J.D. Peak antibody production is associated with increased oxidative metabolism in an
industrially relevant fed-batch CHO cell culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013, 110, 2013–2024. [CrossRef]
19. Dean, J.; Reddy, P. Metabolic analysis of antibody producing CHO cells in fed-batch production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013, 110,
1735–1747. [CrossRef]
20. Chong, W.P.; Reddy, S.G.; Yusufi, F.N.; Lee, D.Y.; Wong, N.S.; Heng, C.K.; Yap, M.G.; Ho, Y.S. Metabolomics-driven approach
for the improvement of Chinese hamster ovary cell growth: Overexpression of malate dehydrogenase II. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 147,
116–121. [CrossRef]
21. Mulukutla, B.C.; Kale, J.; Kalomeris, T.; Jacobs, M.; Hiller, G.W. Identification and control of novel growth inhibitors in fed-batch
cultures of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017, 114, 1779–1790. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cells 2022, 11, 1929 20 of 21
22. Alden, N.; Raju, R.; McElearney, K.; Lambropoulos, J.; Kshirsagar, R.; Gilbert, A.; Lee, K. Using Metabolomics to Identify Cell
Line-Independent Indicators of Growth Inhibition for Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell-based Bioprocesses. Metabolites 2020, 10, 199.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
23. Nicolae, A.; Wahrheit, J.; Bahnemann, J.; Zeng, A.P.; Heinzle, E. Non-stationary 13C metabolic flux analysis of Chinese hamster
ovary cells in batch culture using extracellular labeling highlights metabolic reversibility and compartmentation. BMC Syst. Biol.
2014, 8, 50. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Nargund, S.; Qiu, J.; Goudar, C.T. Elucidating the role of copper in CHO cell energy metabolism using 13 C metabolic flux analysis.
Biotechnol. Prog. 2015, 31, 1179–1186. [CrossRef]
25. Kirsch, B.J.; Bennun, S.V.; Mendez, A.; Johnson, A.S.; Wang, H.; Qiu, H.; Li, N.; Lawrence, S.M.; Bak, H.; Betenbaugh, M.J.
Metabolic Analysis of the Asparagine and Glutamine Dynamics in an Industrial CHO Fed-Batch Process. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2021,
119, 807–819. [CrossRef]
26. Torres, M.; Elvin, M.; Betts, Z.; Place, S.; Gaffney, C.; Dickson, A.J. Metabolic profiling of Chinese hamster ovary cell cultures at
different working volumes and agitation speeds using spin tube reactors. Biotechnol. Prog. 2021, 37, e3099. [CrossRef]
27. Miccheli, A.T.; Miccheli, A.; Di Clemente, R.; Valerio, M.; Coluccia, P.; Bizzarri, M.; Conti, F. NMR-based metabolic profiling
of human hepatoma cells in relation to cell growth by culture media analysis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1760, 1723–1731.
[CrossRef]
28. Khoo, S.H.; Al-Rubeai, M. Metabolic characterization of a hyper-productive state in an antibody producing NS0 myeloma cell
line. Metab. Eng. 2009, 11, 199–211. [CrossRef]
29. Luo, J.; Vijayasankaran, N.; Autsen, J.; Santuray, R.; Hudson, T.; Amanullah, A.; Li, F. Comparative metabolite analysis to
understand lactate metabolism shift in Chinese hamster ovary cell culture process. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 146–156.
[CrossRef]
30. Matuszczyk, J.C.; Teleki, A.; Pfizenmaier, J.; Takors, R. Compartment-specific metabolomics for CHO reveals that ATP pools in
mitochondria are much lower than in cytosol. Biotechnol. J. 2015, 10, 1639–1650. [CrossRef]
31. Vodopivec, M.; Lah, L.; Narat, M.; Curk, T. Metabolomic profiling of CHO fed-batch growth phases at 10, 100, and 1,000 L.
Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2019, 116, 2720–2729. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. Goudar, C.; Biener, R.; Boisart, C.; Heidemann, R.; Piret, J.; de Graaf, A.; Konstantinov, K. Metabolic flux analysis of CHO cells in
perfusion culture by metabolite balancing and 2D [13 C, 1 H] COSY NMR spectroscopy. Metab. Eng. 2010, 12, 138–149. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
33. Ahn, W.S.; Antoniewicz, M.R. Parallel labeling experiments with [1,2-13 C]glucose and [U-13 C]glutamine provide new insights
into CHO cell metabolism. Metab. Eng. 2013, 15, 34–47. [CrossRef]
34. Templeton, N.; Lewis, A.; Dorai, H.; Qian, E.A.; Campbell, M.P.; Smith, K.D.; Lang, S.E.; Betenbaugh, M.J.; Young, J.D. The impact
of anti-apoptotic gene Bcl-2∆ expression on CHO central metabolism. Metab. Eng. 2014, 25, 92–102. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Slade, P.G.; Caspary, R.G.; Nargund, S.; Huang, C.J. Mannose metabolism in recombinant CHO cells and its effect on IgG
glycosylation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016, 113, 1468–1480. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Wijaya, A.W.; Verhagen, N.; Teleki, A.; Takors, R. Compartment-specific 13 C metabolic flux analysis reveals boosted NADPH
availability coinciding with increased cell-specific productivity for IgG1 producing CHO cells after MTA treatment. Eng. Life Sci.
2021, 21, 832–847. [CrossRef]
37. Wijaya, A.W.; Ulmer, A.; Hundsdorfer, L.; Verhagen, N.; Teleki, A.; Takors, R. Compartment-specific metabolome labeling enables
the identification of subcellular fluxes that may serve as promising metabolic engineering targets in CHO cells. Bioprocess Biosyst.
Eng. 2021, 44, 2567–2578. [CrossRef]
38. Pereira, S.; Kildegaard, H.F.; Andersen, M.R. Impact of CHO Metabolism on Cell Growth and Protein Production: An Overview
of Toxic and Inhibiting Metabolites and Nutrients. Biotechnol. J. 2018, 13, e1700499. [CrossRef]
39. Quek, L.E.; Dietmair, S.; Krömer, J.O.; Nielsen, L.K. Metabolic flux analysis in mammalian cell culture. Metab. Eng. 2010, 12,
161–171. [CrossRef]
40. Junghans, L.; Teleki, A.; Wijaya, A.W.; Becker, M.; Schweikert, M.; Takors, R. From nutritional wealth to autophagy: In vivo
metabolic dynamics in the cytosol, mitochondrion and shuttles of IgG producing CHO cells. Metab. Eng. 2019, 54, 145–159.
[CrossRef]
41. Sheikholeslami, Z.; Jolicoeur, M.; Henry, O. Probing the metabolism of an inducible mammalian expression system using
extracellular isotopomer analysis. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 164, 469–478. [CrossRef]
42. Sheikholeslami, Z.; Jolicoeur, M.; Henry, O. Elucidating the effects of postinduction glutamine feeding on the growth and
productivity of CHO cells. Biotechnol. Prog. 2014, 30, 535–546. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Chong, W.P.; Thng, S.H.; Hiu, A.P.; Lee, D.Y.; Chan, E.C.; Ho, Y.S. LC-MS-based metabolic characterization of high monoclonal
antibody-producing Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 3103–3111. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
44. Carinhas, N.; Duarte, T.M.; Barreiro, L.C.; Carrondo, M.J.; Alves, P.M.; Teixeira, A.P. Metabolic signatures of GS-CHO cell clones
associated with butyrate treatment and culture phase transition. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013, 110, 3244–3257. [CrossRef]
45. Blondeel, E.J.M.; Ho, R.; Schulze, S.; Sokolenko, S.; Guillemette, S.R.; Slivac, I.; Durocher, Y.; Guillemette, J.G.; McConkey, B.J.;
Chang, D.; et al. An omics approach to rational feed: Enhancing growth in CHO cultures with NMR metabolomics and 2D-DIGE
proteomics. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 234, 127–138. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cells 2022, 11, 1929 21 of 21
46. Aranibar, N.; Borys, M.; Mackin, N.A.; Ly, V.; Abu-Absi, N.; Abu-Absi, S.; Niemitz, M.; Schilling, B.; Li, Z.J.; Brock, B.; et al.
NMR-based metabolomics of mammalian cell and tissue cultures. J. Biomol. NMR 2011, 49, 195–206. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
47. Chong, W.P.; Yusufi, F.N.; Lee, D.Y.; Reddy, S.G.; Wong, N.S.; Heng, C.K.; Yap, M.G.; Ho, Y.S. Metabolomics-based identification
of apoptosis-inducing metabolites in recombinant fed-batch CHO culture media. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 151, 218–224. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
48. Carvalhal, A.V.; Santos, S.S.; Calado, J.; Haury, M.; Carrondo, M.J. Cell growth arrest by nucleotides, nucleosides and bases as a
tool for improved production of recombinant proteins. Biotechnol. Prog. 2003, 19, 69–83. [CrossRef]
49. Chen, X.G.; Wang, R.S.; Deng, M.X.; Ran, X.Z. Effects of exogenerous nucleotides on the apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells
IEC-6. J. Hyg. Res. 2005, 34, 701–704.
50. Zhang, L.-X.; Zhang, W.-Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, J.-T.; Deng, X.-C.; Liu, X.-P.; Fan, L.; Tan, W.-S. Responses of CHO-DHFR cells to ratio
of asparagine to glutamine in feed media: Cell growth, antibody production, metabolic waste, glutamate, and energy metabolism.
Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2016, 3, 5. [CrossRef]
51. Duarte, T.M.; Carinhas, N.; Barreiro, L.C.; Carrondo, M.J.; Alves, P.M.; Teixeira, A.P. Metabolic responses of CHO cells to limitation
of key amino acids. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2014, 111, 2095–2106. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
52. Mohmad-Saberi, S.E.; Hashim, Y.Z.; Mel, M.; Amid, A.; Ahmad-Raus, R.; Packeer-Mohamed, V. Metabolomics profiling of
extracellular metabolites in CHO-K1 cells cultured in different types of growth media. Cytotechnology 2013, 65, 577–586. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
53. Jiang, D.J.; Jia, S.J.; Dai, Z.; Li, Y.J. Asymmetric dimethylarginine induces apoptosis via p38 MAPK/caspase-3-dependent signaling
pathway in endothelial cells. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2006, 40, 529–539. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
54. Zamani, L.; Lundqvist, M.; Zhang, Y.; Aberg, M.; Edfors, F.; Bidkhori, G.; Lindahl, A.; Mie, A.; Mardinoglu, A.; Field, R.; et al.
High Cell Density Perfusion Culture has a Maintained Exoproteome and Metabolome. Biotechnol. J. 2018, 13, e1800036. [CrossRef]
55. Taschwer, M.; Hackl, M.; Hernández Bort, J.A.; Leitner, C.; Kumar, N.; Puc, U.; Grass, J.; Papst, M.; Kunert, R.; Altmann, F.;
et al. Growth, productivity and protein glycosylation in a CHO EpoFc producer cell line adapted to glutamine-free growth. J.
Biotechnol. 2012, 157, 295–303. [CrossRef]
56. Sumit, M.; Dolatshahi, S.; Chu, A.A.; Cote, K.; Scarcelli, J.J.; Marshall, J.K.; Cornell, R.J.; Weiss, R.; Lauffenburger, D.A.; Mulukutla,
B.C.; et al. Dissecting N-Glycosylation Dynamics in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells Fed-batch Cultures using Time Course Omics
Analyses. iScience 2019, 12, 102–120. [CrossRef]
57. Chang, D.E.; Smalley, D.J.; Conway, T. Gene expression profiling of Escherichia coli growth transitions: An expanded stringent
response model. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 45, 289–306. [CrossRef]
58. Chrysanthopoulos, P.K.; Goudar, C.T.; Klapa, M.I. Metabolomics for high-resolution monitoring of the cellular physiological state
in cell culture engineering. Metab. Eng. 2010, 12, 212–222. [CrossRef]
59. Altamirano, C.; Illanes, A.; Becerra, S.; Cairó, J.J.; Gòdia, F. Considerations on the lactate consumption by CHO cells in the
presence of galactose. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 125, 547–556. [CrossRef]
60. Vcelar, S.; Jadhav, V.; Melcher, M.; Auer, N.; Hrdina, A.; Sagmeister, R.; Heffner, K.; Puklowski, A.; Betenbaugh, M.; Wenger, T.;
et al. Karyotype variation of CHO host cell lines over time in culture characterized by chromosome counting and chromosome
painting. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2018, 115, 165–173. [CrossRef]
61. Huhn, S.; Chang, M.; Kumar, A.; Liu, R.; Jiang, B.; Betenbaugh, M.; Lin, H.; Nyberg, G.; Du, Z. Chromosomal instability drives
convergent and divergent evolution toward advantageous inherited traits in mammalian CHO bioproduction lineages. iScience
2022, 25, 104074. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
62. Weinguny, M.; Klanert, G.; Eisenhut, P.; Lee, I.; Timp, W.; Borth, N. Subcloning induces changes in the DNA-methylation pattern
of outgrowing Chinese hamster ovary cell colonies. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 16, e2000350. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
63. Templeton, N.; Smith, K.D.; McAtee-Pereira, A.G.; Dorai, H.; Betenbaugh, M.J.; Lang, S.E.; Young, J.D. Application of 13 C flux
analysis to identify high-productivity CHO metabolic phenotypes. Metab. Eng. 2017, 43, 218–225. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
64. Ma, N.; Ellet, J.; Okediadi, C.; Hermes, P.; McCormick, E.; Casnocha, S. A single nutrient feed supports both chemically defined
NS0 and CHO fed-batch processes: Improved productivity and lactate metabolism. Biotechnol. Prog. 2009, 25, 1353–1363.
[CrossRef]
65. Huang, Z.; Lee, D.Y.; Yoon, S. Quantitative intracellular flux modeling and applications in biotherapeutic development and
production using CHO cell cultures. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017, 114, 2717–2728. [CrossRef]