Solutions Ch05
Solutions Ch05
Solutions Ch05
5
Return Concepts
Solutions
1. A. The expected holding period was one year. The actual holding period was from
October 15, 2007 to November 5, 2007, which is three weeks.
B. Given fair pricing, the expected return equals the required return, 8.7 percent. The ex-
pected price appreciation return over the initial anticipated one-year holding period must
be equal to the required return minus the dividend yield, 2.11/72.08 = 0.0293 or 2.93
percent. Thus the expected price appreciation return was 8.7% − 2.93% = 5.77 percent.
C. The realized return was ($69.52 − $72.08)/$72.08 = −0.03552 or negative 3.55 percent
over three weeks. There was no dividend yield return over the actual holding period.
D. The required return over a three-week holding period was (1.00161)3 − 1 = 0.484 per-
cent. Using the answer to C, the realized alpha was −3.552 − 0.484 = −4.036 percent
or −4.04 percent.
2. For AOL Time Warner, the required return is
113
114 Solutions
r = T-bill rate
+ (Sensitivity to equity market factor × Equity risk premium)
+ ( Sensitivity to size factor × Size risk premium )
+ ( Sensitivity to value factor × Value risk premium )
This example indicates that Newmont Mining has a required return of 3 percent. When
beta is negative, an asset has a CAPM required rate of return that is below the risk-free
rate. Cases of equities with negative betas are relatively rare.
5. B is correct. The Fama–French model incorporates market, size, and value risk factors.
One possible interpretation of the value risk factor is that it relates to financial distress.
6. Larsen & Toubro Ltd’s WACC is 13.64 percent, calculated as follows:
7. A is correct. The backfilling of index returns using companies that have survived to the
index construction date is expected to introduce a positive survivorship bias into returns.
8. B is correct. The events of 2004 to 2006 depressed share returns but 1) are not a persistent
feature of the stock market environment, 2) were not offset by other positive events within
the historical record, and 3) have led to relatively low valuation levels, which are expected
to rebound.
9. A is correct. The required return reflects the magnitude of the historical equity risk pre-
mium, which is generally higher when based on a short-term interest rate (as a result of
the normal upward sloping yield curve), and the current value of the rate being used to
represent the risk-free rate. The short-term rate is currently higher than the long-term
rate, which will also increase the required return estimate. The short-term interest rate,
however, overstates the long-term expected inflation rate. Using the short-term interest
rate, estimates of the long-term required return on equity will be biased upward.
Chapter 5 Return Concepts 115
By substitution, we get:
Equity risk premium = dividend yield on the index based on year-ahead aggregate
forecasted dividends and aggregate market value + consensus long-term earnings growth
rate − current long-term government bond yield. The equity risk premium = 1.2% +
4.0% − 3.0% = 2.2%.
116 Solutions
17. B is correct. The weighted average cost of capital is taking the sum product of each com-
ponent of capital multiplied by the component’s after-tax cost.
First, estimate the cost of equity using the CAPM:
Cost of equity = Risk-free rate + [Equity Risk Premium × Beta]
Cost of equity = 3.0% + [5.5% × 2.00] = 14%
18. B is correct. The steps to estimating a beta for a non-traded company are:
Step 1 Select the comparable benchmark
Step 2 Estimate the benchmark’s beta
Step 3 Unlever the benchmark’s beta
Step 4 Lever the beta to reflect the subject company’s financial leverage
The beta of the benchmark peer company data is given as 1.09. Next, this beta needs to
be unlevered, calculated as:
1
βu = βl
1 + D
E
1
βu = (1.09 )
1 + 0 . 60
0.40
βu = 0.436, or 0.44
Then, the unlevered beta needs to be levered up to reflect the financial leverage of Twin
Industries, calculated as:
D ′
β′E ≈ 1 + βu
E ′
0.49
β′E ≈ 1 + ( 0.436 )
0.51
βu = 0.8549, or 0.85
Chapter 5 Return Concepts 117
19. A is correct. Johansson intends to estimate a required return on equity using a modified
CAPM approach. Twin Industries is stated to be smaller than the chosen proxy bench-
mark being used and there is no size premium adjustment in the CAPM framework; the
framework adjusts the beta for leverage differences but this does not adjust for firm size
differences. The build-up method may be more appropriate as it includes the equity risk
premium and one or more additional premia, often based on factors such as size and per-
ceived company-specific risk.