Landscape Architecture Fifth Edition A Manual of Environmental Planning and Design 5th Edition Ebook PDF
Landscape Architecture Fifth Edition A Manual of Environmental Planning and Design 5th Edition Ebook PDF
Landscape Architecture Fifth Edition A Manual of Environmental Planning and Design 5th Edition Ebook PDF
2. CLIMATE
Climate and Response
Social Imprint
Accommodation
Microclimatology
Climate Change/Global Warming
3. WATER
Water as a Resource
Natural Systems
Management
Water-Related Site Design
4. LAND
Human Impact
Land as a Resource
Land Grants
Land Rights
Surveying
Use
Reuse
Topography
Surveys
Supplementary Data
5. VEGETATION
Topsoil Mantle
Plants in Nature
Plant Identification
Plant Culture
Introduced Plantations
Invasive Species
Vanishing Green
Urban Agriculture
Urban Forestry
13. CIRCULATION
Motion
Sequence
Pedestrian Movement
The Automobile
Complete Streets
Travel by Rail, Water, and Air
People Movers
14. STRUCTURES
Common Denominators
Composition
Structures in the Landscape
The Defined Open Space
Habitations
Dwelling-Nature Relationships
Human Needs and Habitat
Residential Components
PERSPECTIVE
Disavowal and Quest
Findings
Insights
Evolution and Revolution
The Planned Experience
Retrospective
Project Credits
Quotation Sources
Bibliography
Index
Prologue
In 1961, over 50 years ago, the first edition of Landscape
Architecture was published and instantly filled the void that
existed for a comprehensive presentation of the profession
and how to plan for the human use of land harmoniously
with the environment. These were the early days of what
became known as the environmental movement, sparked by
a series of wake-up calls, such as Rachel Carson’s book
Silent Spring, sending a signal throughout the country—
and, indeed, the world—that people had to fundamentally
change the way they viewed and interacted with their
surroundings. No longer could we continue to think we had
dominion over the Earth and ignore the fact that we are an
inseparable part of nature and nature is part of us. No
longer could we destroy our forests, abuse our soil, pollute
our air and water, squander our natural resources, and
overpopulate the Earth without dire future consequences.
The fledgling profession of landscape architecture, which
had come into being less than a hundred years earlier, was
in the right place at the right time, so to speak, with the
right skills and knowledge to take on the leadership role
among the design professions in this new movement.
Educated and trained in architecture, civil engineering,
botany, geology, horticulture, the natural sciences, and
social issues, landscape architects were uniquely qualified
to assume this role. At the time, however, the profession
was relatively unknown and misunderstood, and its
literature then was for the most part outdated and focused
on a previous era. John Simonds would change that.
John had studied landscape architecture at Michigan State
University, traveled the world, studied Eastern philosophy,
lived among the native people of Borneo, worked in
conservation, became a student of the environment, and
embraced the principles of the emerging science of
ecology. In 1939, John—a member of the infamous “class of
rebels” that included Garrett Eckbo, Dan Kiley, and Charles
Rose—graduated from Harvard with a master’s degree in
landscape architecture.
This placed him in a unique position that enabled him to
become the profession’s major advocate for the
environmental movement and to tell the story of the role of
landscape architecture in it. John wrote the first edition of
Landscape Architecture “because,” he said, “I felt
compelled to get the word out about the comprehensive
profession of landscape architecture.” Over the next 30
years, two revised editions were published with John as the
sole author. The story of my role as coauthor began some
ten years later.
On the afternoon of December 12, 2004, my phone rang,
the caller ID read “John Simonds,” and a dreadful thought
flashed through my mind. It had been several years since
John and I had talked, following two years of intense
communication preparing for the American Society of
Landscape Architect’s Centennial Celebration. John was
not well at that time and I feared it was his family calling to
say that he was gravely ill or had passed away. Following
my hello, the sound of John’s voice engendered a sigh of
relief, and what he was about to say would shift my
emotions from fear to total elation.
“Barry, would you consider working with me as the
coauthor of the fourth edition of Landscape Architecture?”
I couldn’t believe what I was hearing. Then another flash—
a flashback to November 22, 1963. Most people who were
old enough at the time remember this as the day President
John F. Kennedy was assassinated and, to a person,
remember where they were and what they were doing at
that time. On that day I was in the library at the University
of California, Berkeley, completely absorbed in John
Simonds’s first edition of Landscape Architecture. Of
course, the assassination of John F. Kennedy was an event
that touched everyone, but for me personally the impact
that event would have on my life and career was clearly
secondary to the one that John Simonds’s book would have
on my future and future generations of landscape
architects.
When John first published Landscape Architecture in 1961,
it was before the digital revolution and modern methods
facilitating the practice of the profession, including
computer-aided design and Geographic Information
Systems. However, what John presented in the first and
subsequent editions of Landscape Architecture is as
applicable today as it was when first published. John’s
genius in communicating the principles of landscape
architectural planning and design, through his writing,
sketches, and shared words of the wisdom of others, is
indeed timeless and will no doubt help shape this century
as it did the last.
During the following months, we exchanged ideas and
worked on the fourth edition. John’s role was to complete
the revised manuscript, and mine was to review the
manuscript and gather photographs—as John described,
“Best in Show”—of works of landscape architecture and
related subjects to illustrate the book. He considered the
writing of Landscape Architecture his most significant
professional accomplishment, and, of course, working with
John as coauthor has been one of the great honors of my
career.
Then, on May 26, I received the phone call that I had
feared that December 12 call to be. After a fall and a brief
stay in the hospital, John returned home, where he passed
away near family and friends. When John died, he had
already finished the manuscript for the fourth edition,
leaving his wife, Marj, in charge of final editing. With
renewed vigor and commitment to John’s legacy—the
legacy of one of the most influential landscape architects of
the twentieth century—my work shifted into high gear, and,
as Marj liked to say, “the rest is history.” (Marj Simonds
died in April 2012.)
The fourth edition of Landscape Architecture has been
published in three languages—English, Chinese, and
Japanese—and distributed worldwide. For the first time, it
is also available in digital format. This fifth edition is the
first to be published without John’s direct input. However,
much care has been taken to preserve the essential
character and timelessness of what he first created in the
early 1960s, while updating other material and providing
refreshing new images and illustrations. It is my hope that
further editions of this book will continue to be published
into the indefinite future, thus extending the legacy of John
Ormsbee Simonds and his contributions toward making the
world a better place.
Barry W. Starke
Foreword
Landscape Architecture has been written in response to the
need for a book outlining the land-planning process in
clear, simple, and practical terms. In a larger sense it is a
guide book on how to live more compatibly on planet Earth.
It introduces us to an understanding of nature as the
background and base for all human activities; it describes
the planning constraints imposed by the forms, forces, and
features of nature and our built environment; it instills a
feeling for climate and its design implications; it discusses
site selection and analysis; it instructs in the planning of
workable and well-related use areas; it considers the
volumetric shaping of exterior spaces; it explores the
possibilities of site-structure organization; it applies
contemporary thinking in the planning of expressive human
habitations and communities; and it provides guidance in
the creation of more efficient and pleasant places and ways
within the context of the city and the region.
This book is not intended to explain all forms of the
practice of the profession or to explicate the latest
technology. Nor is it proposed that the reader will become,
per se, an expert land planner. As with training in other
fields, proficiency comes with long years of study, travel,
observation, and professional experience. The reader
should, however, gain through this book a keener and more
telling awareness of our physical surroundings. The reader
should also gain much useful knowledge to be applied in
the design of homes, schools, recreation areas, shopping
malls, trafficways … or any other project to be fitted into,
and planned in harmony with, the all-embracing landscape.
This, at least, has been the express intent.
The work of the landscape architect
(architect of the landscape)
is to help bring people,
their structures, activities, and communities
into harmonious relationship
with the living earth—
with the “want-to-be” of the land.
The Hunter and the
Philosopher
Once there was a hunter who spent his days tracking the
wide prairies of North Dakota with his gun and dog and
sometimes with a small boy who would beg to trot along.
On this particular morning, hunter and boy, far out on the
prairie, sat watching intently a rise of ground ahead of
them. It was pocked with gopher holes. From time to time a
small striped gopher would whisk nervously from the
mouth of his den to the cover of matted prairie grass, soon
to reappear with cheek food pouches bulging.
“Smart little outfits, the gophers,” the hunter observed. “I
mean the way they have things figured out. Whenever you
come upon a gopher village, you can be sure it will be near
a patch of grain where they can get their food and close by
a creek or slough for water. They’ll not build their towns
near willow clumps, for there’s where the owls or hawks
will be roosting. And you’ll not be finding them near stony
ledges or a pile of rocks where their enemies the snakes
will be hiding ready to snatch them. When these wise little
critters build their towns, they search out the southeast
slope of a knoll that will catch the full sweep of the sun
each day to keep their dens warm and cozy. The winter
blizzards that pound out of the north and west to leave the
windward slopes of the rises frozen solid will only drift
loose powder snow on top of their homes.
“When they dig their dens,” continued the hunter, “do you
know that they do? They slant the runway steeply down for
2 or 3 feet and then double back up near the surface again
where they level off a nice dry shelf. That’s where they lie—
close under the sod roots, out of the wind, warmed by the
sun, near to their food and water, as far as they can get
from their enemies, and surrounded by all their gopher
friends. Yes, sir, they sure have it all planned out!”
“Is our town built on a southeast slope?” the small boy
asked thoughtfully.
“No,” said the hunter, “our town slopes down to the north,
in the teeth of the bitter winter winds and cold as a frosty
gun barrel.” He frowned. “Even in summer the breezes
work against us. When we built the new flax mill, the only
mill for 40 miles, where do you think we put it? We built it
right smack on the only spot where every breeze in the
summertime can catch the smoke from its stack and pour it
across our houses and into our open windows!?”
“At least our town is near the river and water,” said the boy
defensively.
“Yes,” replied the hunter. “But where near the river did we
build our homes? On the low, flat land inside the river bend,
that’s where. And each spring when the snows melt on the
prairie and the river swells, it floods out every cellar in our
town.”
“Gophers would plan things better than that,” the small boy
decided.
“Yes,” said the hunter, “a gopher would be smarter.”
“When gophers plan their homes and towns,” the boy
philosophized, “they seem to do it better than people do.”
“Yes,” mused the hunter, “and so do most of the animals I
know. Sometimes I wonder why.”
1
THE HUMAN HABITAT AND
SUSTAINABILITY
NASA
P
eople are animals, too. We still retain, and are largely
motivated by, our natural animal instincts. If we are to
plan intelligently, we must acknowledge and accommodate
these instincts; the shortcomings of many a project can be
traced to the failure of the planner to recognize this simple
fact.
We are creatures of the meadow, the forest, the sea, and the
plain. We are born with a love of fresh air in our lungs, dry
paths under our feet, and the penetrating heat of the sun on
our skin. We are born with a love for the feel and smell of
rich, warm earth, the taste and sparkle of clear water, the
refreshing coolness of foliage overhead, and the spacious
blue dome of the sky. Deep down inside we have for these
things a longing, a desire sometimes compelling, sometimes
quiescent—but always it is there.
It has been proposed by many sages that, other things being
equal, the happiest person is one who lives in closest, fullest
harmony with nature. It might then be reasoned: Why not
restore humans to the woods? Let them have their water
and earth and sky, and plenty of it. But is the primeval forest
—preserved, untouched, or simulated—our ideal
environment? Hardly. For the story of the human race is the
story of an unending struggle to ameliorate the forces of
nature. Gradually, laboriously, we have improved our
shelters, secured a more sustained and varied supply of
food, and extended control over the elements to improve
our way of living.
Nature
Nature reveals itself to each of us according to our
interests. To the naturalist, nature unfolds a wonderland of
spiderweb, egg mass, and fern frond. To the miner, nature is
the tenacious yet prodigious source of minerals—coal,
copper, tungsten, lead, silver. To the hydroelectric engineer,
nature is an abundant reservoir of power. To the structural
engineer, nature in every guise is an eloquent
demonstration of the universal principles of form creation to
be understood and applied.
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.