View Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue

Study of cetyltrialkylammonium bromide and tribromide salts in the solid phase

R. Caminiti,*a M. Carbone,b G. Mancinic and C. Saduna

aDept. of Chemistry, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica della Materia, University of Rome ‘L a Sapienza’, P.le A. Moro,
5 00185 Rome, Italy
bDept. of Chemical Sciences and T echnologies, University ‘T or Vergata’, V ia della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Rome,
Italy
cCentro CNR di Studio sui Meccanismi di Reazione, C/O Dept. of Chemistry, University of Rome ‘L a Sapienza’,
P.le A. Moro, 5 00185 Rome, Italy

Some cetyltrialkylammonium tribromide salts have been studied in the solid phase using Raman spectroscopy and energy
dispersive X-ray di
raction. The first technique detected the presence of asymmetric tribromides while the latter technique revealed
the degree of asymmetry of the tribromide units (di
erence in the bond lengths between external and central Br atoms), by
Published on 01 January 1997. Downloaded on 3/10/2020 3:46:40 PM.

application of a subtraction method. In this method the spectra of the corresponding monobromide salts were recorded and
di
erences between tribromide and monobromide curves isolated the tribromide contributions. The existence of asymmetrical and
symmetrical tribromide ions has been established and the degree of asymmetry was then correlated to the steric hindrance and
electronegativity of the ammonium substituents. The values of the BrMBr bond distances have been deduced; the most asymmetric
tribromide has BrMBr distances at 2.38 and 2.66 Å, while the symmetric tribromide has both BrMBr bond lengths equal to 2.52 Å.
A linear geometry is confirmed for the tribromide ions.

The study of polyhalides is important from an applied and a Cetyltrymethylammonium bromide (CTAB) is one of the
fundamental point of view. Polyhalides are typically used in most studied cationic surfactants, used in many fields such as
oxidation reactions of organic molecules as well as for doping micellar catalysis, medicine and detergency. This surfactant
polymers in order to change their conductivity.1 forms micellar aggregates in aqueous solution which are
The number of atoms in a polyhalogen unit can be quite responsible for its useful physico-chemical properties. The
large and depends on the nature of the halogen atom as well corresponding tribromide salt as well as the others we investi-
as on the hosting structure. Units containing up to seven2 and gated are surfactants used in bromination reactions.11–15
eight3 atoms have been found for polyiodides and up to ten The studied quaternary ammonium salts all contain the
for polybromides.4 cetyl (C H ) fragment but di
er in the head group so that
16 33
In all cases a better knowledge of the polybromides structure we investigated the e
ect of head group variation on the
helps in the understanding of their properties and possible polyhalogen asymmetry.
applications. As far as tribromides are concerned, structural Study of the polyhalogen asymmetry is usually carried out
studies showed that the tribromide ions usually have linear by a combination of Raman spectroscopy and X-ray di
rac-
geometry which can be either symmetric, with the same bond tion. The stretching vibration frequencies are correlated to the
lengths between the external and the central Br atoms number of atoms in the polyhalogen unit as well as to their
[Br(1)MBr(2)=Br(2)MBr(3)], such as in [(CH ) NH+] structure. For a tribromide the Raman spectra can be used to
33 2
Br−Br −5 or asymmetric with di
erent lengths between the deduce whether the ion is symmetric or asymmetric.
3
external and the central Br atoms [Br(1)MBr(2)≠ The X-ray di
raction technique can give information about
Br(2)MBr(3)], such as in CsBr ,6 with a di
erence of 0.33 Å). the structure, thus, in the present case, an exact evaluation of
3
The degree of asymmetry is even higher in PBr where the the degree of asymmetry can be achieved.
7
Br − units show bond lengths of 2.39 and 2.91 Å.7 The deg- In the present study we employed both techniques. In
3
ree of asymmetry (the di
erence between the BrMBr bond particular the degree of asymmetry of the tribromide was
lengths) is not constant in di
erent tribromides, but depends determined by large angle X-ray scattering (LAXS). LAXS is
on the counter ion and on the host structure. a powerful technique for determining structural parameters of
Several reports, based on Raman spectroscopic evidence, non-crystalline systems, since it can provide information about
support the existence of tribromide and pentabromide the short-range order.11–26,30 In particular energy dispersive
anions.4,8–10 X-ray di
raction (EDXD)18–20,22,25,26,29–31 has been found to
Studies on cetyltrimethylammonim tribromide (CTAB3) are be a suitable tool in the investigation of such systems due to
reported in ref. 4. The authors indicate the presence, in this its high speed and reliability compared to traditional angular
molecule, of two Raman bands at 153 and 205 cm−1, which scanning X-ray di
raction (ADXD).
they attribute to BrMBr stretching vibrations, concluding that For this purpose, X-ray di
raction patterns of the corre-
the Br(1)MBr(2) and Br(2)MBr(3) distances are di
erent. No sponding monobromide samples were collected, and di
erences
structural studies on powdered CTA bromide or tribromide evaluated between the curves relative to the tribromide salts
have been reported. and the corresponding monobromide ones. In this way the
We investigate here the degree of asymmetry of the tribrom- contribution of the tribromide unit was isolated and analysed.
ide ion in CTAB3 (sample G1) and in three other quaternary
ammonium salts; cetylquinuclidinium tribromide (CQB3,
sample G3), cetyltripropylammonium tribromide (CTPAB3, Experimental
sample G5) and cetyldimethyl(2-hydroxyethyl)ammonium
tribromide (CDEAB3, sample G7). Materials
The CTAB (sample G2), which is commercially available
* Email: [email protected] (Fluka) was purified by crystallization from absolute alcohol

J. Mater. Chem., 1997, 7(8), 1331–1337 1331

 View Article Online

and diethyl ether. The cetylquinuclidinium bromide (sample fall outside of the used energy range. The stability of the
G4) was prepared as reported in ref. 27. The cetyltripropylam- voltage power supply for X-rays is better than 0.1%.
monium bromide and the cetyldimethyl(2-hydroxylethyl)am- The X-ray tube operates at 50 kV and 40 mA for recording
monium bromide (samples G6 and G8) were prepared by the spectra of all samples while conditions of 45 keV and
standard quaternization procedures. 35 mA were also used for sample G5.
The corresponding yellow–orange tribromides were pre- X-Ray detection was accomplished using an EG&G liquid-
pared through reaction of the monobromides with Br , as nitrogen cooled ultrapure Ge SSD (ORTEC, model 92X),
2
reported in ref. 31. connected to a PC 286 via ADCAM hardware and Maestro
Elemental analyses for H, C, N and Br were performed by II software, which performs the necessary analogue-to-digital
the Microanalytical Service of the Area della Ricerca di Roma conversions and amplifications. In order to obtain the relation
of the CNR, giving results in agreement with the formulae of between the photon energy vs. the channel number in the
the materials (Table 1). multichannel analyser (MCA), the absorption edge of Ba, In,
Pd and Eu were used. The linear relationship between the
Techniques photon energy and the channel number was good.
Raman spectra. FT Raman spectra (resolution ±4 cm−1) of
Measurements
the tribromide salts were recorded on a FRA 106 FT-Raman
accessory, mounted on a Bruker IFS 66 FT-IR vacuum The transmission geometry has been employed, since it allows
instrument, operating with an exciting frequency of 1064 nm an easier correction for the sample absorption.29,30 For
Published on 01 January 1997. Downloaded on 3/10/2020 3:46:40 PM.

(Nd5YAG laser) and with a germanium diode detector cooled measurement of the incident beam spectrum, which is necessary
at liquid N temperature. Power levels of the laser source in the energy dispersive method, we used the tube at 50 or
2
varied between 20 and 100 mW. The solid samples were packed 45 kV and 2 mA, while the dimension of the slits was
into a suitable cell and then fitted into the compartment 100 mm×160 mm.
designed to use 180° scattering geometry. No sample decompo- Fig. 1 shows the primary beam spectrum as well as trans-
sition was observed during the experiments. mission spectra of samples G7 and G8 measured under the
same conditions. Each of the three measurements was recorded
X-Ray di
raction patterns. The dispersive X-ray di
raction over 15 000 s. In order to exclude the fluorescence lines from
experiments were carried out by employing a non-commercial the spectrum as well as regions where the intensity is strongly
X-ray energy scanning di
ractometer,25,26,30 with a solid-state absorbed by the sample, the range used in the data analysis
detector, constructed at the Department of Chemistry, was restricted between channel 330 and 680, which corresponds
University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, Powder Di
raction to an energy range of 22.123–45.735 keV. In order to cover a
Laboratory.29 In the design of the machine the goniometer is suciently wide region of s-space (s=1.014Esin h) the di
racted
substituted by two rotating arms, which can be moved indepen- X-ray photons from samples were collected at di
erent scat-
dently by a motor in the range of 2h −5° to 120°, by a tering angles. Measurement angles and used energy ranges are
program from our group written in BASIC. The X-ray optical listed in Table 2.
path is defined by four Huber 20 mm variable slits mounted The scattering intensity was obtained over the range s=
on the arms. The distance between the X-ray source and the 0.2–16.2 Å−1. The sample (a pellet of thickness 2 mm) was
sample, equal to that between the sample and the detector
is 20 cm.
The geometry of our machine is such that both reflection
and transmission intensities can be measured.
Advantages of the energy dispersive method over the conven-
tional angle dispersive method have been described18–20,22,29–31
and the applicability of the method has already been widely
described in the literature.18–20,29,31–33
A more detailed description of the apparatus has been given
in ref. 29 and 30. The X-ray source is a Seifert tube (3 kW)
with a tungsten target, which provides X-radiation in the
energy range 0–60 keV. The W L lines in the energy range
8–11 keV and the fluorescent X-rays from Br (11.91, 13.29 keV)

Table 1 Elemental analysisa

Fig. 1 Energy spectra of the primary beam (a), the transmittance of
sample C(%) N(%) H(%) Br(%) the G8 (b) and the G7 (c) samples vs. channel number in the MCA

G1 (CTAB3) 42.70 2.8 8.23 42.97 Table 2 Scattering parameters associated with the minimum
(43.53) (2.67) (8.07) (45.72) (22.123 eV) and maximum values (45.735 eV) of the energy for each
G2 (CTAB) 61.57 3.99 12.02 24.07 measurement angle
(62.62) (3.84) (11.62) (21.92)
G3 (CQB3) 47.81 2.50 7.55 42.14 h/degrees s s
(47.93) (2.43) (8.04) (41.59) min max
G4 (CQB) 65.61 3.21 10.07 21.11 21 8.04 16.62
(66.32) (3.36) (11.13) (19.18) 15.5 5.99 12.39
G5 (CTPAB3) 50.31 2.12 8.55 38.69 10.5 4.08 8.45
(49.35) (2.3) (8.95) (39.40) 8.0 3.12 6.45
G6 (CTPAB) 66.01 3.21 11.97 18.81 5.0 1.96 4.04
(66.93) (3.12) (12.13) (17.81) 3.5 1.37 2.83
G7 (CDEAB3) 43.01 2.48 7.88 43.45 3.0 1.17 2.43
(43.34) (2.53) (8.00) (43.25) 2.0 0.78 1.62
G8 (CDEAB) 61.02 3.49 11.09 20.39 1.5 0.59 1.21
(60.9) (3.55) (11.24) (20.26) 1.0 0.39 0.80
0.5 0.19 0.41
aCalculated values in parentheses.

1332 J. Mater. Chem., 1997, 7(8), 1331–1337

 View Article Online

placed at the centre of the goniometer. The measuring time at with

each angle was set so as to obtain a minimum of 50 000 counts
per channel. E∞I (E∞)P(E∞, h)A (E, E∞, h)I (E∞, h)
I(E, h)=I (E, h)+ 0 Inc Inc
Fig. 2 shows, as an example, the di
racted intensity vs. the Coh EI (E)P(E, h)A (E, h)
0 Coh
channel number at h=21, for sample G7. The intensity is
(2)
plotted in logarithmic scale in order to show also the Br
fluorescence lines. Restricting the channel ranges means that where h is the scattering angle, E is the photon energy revealed
the Br fluorescence lines can be excluded from the data by the detector and E∞ is the initial energy of a photon
analysis range. inelastically scattered at the observed energy E; K is the scale
Fig. 3 shows di
racted intensities for sample G7 at di
erent factor between the intensity reaching the detector and the
collection angles. The transmittance of the sample at h=0° intensity scattered by a stoichiometric unit of sample; I (E ) is
has been made under the same experimental conditions as that 0
the energy spectrum of the primary beam measured at h=0°;
for the primary beam. The two measurements are necessary to P(E, h) is the polarization factor by a scattering of primary
determine the sample linear absorption coecient, which varies radiation with polarization P(E), I (E, h) is the total scattered
to a significant extent with the X-ray energy. From the relation Coh
elastic intensity and to which three di
erent terms contribute
I (E )/I (E )=exp[−m(E)t] [eqn. (3)], where S c f 2(s) is the self-scattering intensity; c is
t 0 i ii i
the concentration of the di
erent species, i (s) and i (s) are the
we obtain the experimental values of exp[−m(E )t] used in 1 2
intensities of interfering waves scattered by atom pairs belong-
eqn. (1) and (2) for absorption corrections.30,31
Published on 01 January 1997. Downloaded on 3/10/2020 3:46:40 PM.

ing to the same and di
erent domains respectively; s is the

The total intensity I∞ scattered by a sample and observed by scattering parameter and is defined by eqn. (4),
the energy dispersive detector in approximation of single
scattering and transmission geometry25,30,31 can be expressed I (E, h)=∑ c f 2(s)+i (s)+i (s) (3)
Coh ii 1 2
as: n
I∞(E, h)=KI (E )P(E, h)A (E, h)I(E, h) (1) s=4p sin h/l=1.014 E sin h (4)
0 Coh
where E is expressed in keV and s in Å−1. A more detailed
description of the terms reported in eqn. (1) and (2) has been
given in ref. 25 and 29–31.

Data treatment
After correction of the collected experimental data, for escape
peak suppression, the intensity data were handled, as described
by Nishikawa and Iijima,31 by means of our DIF1 program
written in Fortran IV. Normalization to a stoichiometric unit
of volume containing one Br atom was performed. Radial
distribution functions D(r), were calculated from the static
structure functions i(s) [eqn. (5)], according to eqn. (6).

i(s)=I (E, h)−∑ c f 2(s) (5)

coh i ii

P
D(r)=4pr2r +2rp−1 max s.i(s).M(s) sin(rs) ds
s
(6)
Fig. 2 EDXD profile of the sample G7 obtained at h=21 0
0
In this equation r =[S n f (0)]2V −1, where V is the stoichio-
metric unit of volume chosen, n =number of atoms i per unit
0 i ii
i
volume, and f the scattering factor per atom i. The sharpening
i
factor is given by eqn. (7).

M(s)={ f 2(0)/f 2(s)} exp(−0.005 s2) (7)

Br Br
In order to determine the BrMBr bond lengths in the
tribromomide ions, the peaks referring to the BrMBr inter-
actions were isolated by a subtraction method.34–36 By sub-
tracting the radial distribution function of the monobromide
ammonium salts from the corresponding tribromide salts, we
have obtained a di
erence radial distribution function that
contains information selectively about the Br first neighbours
in the range 0–3 Å. The resulting di
erence curves are indicated
as D(r) −D(r) .
Br3 Br
The subtraction operation is valid only if the organic
structure is unaltered by the presence of two extra bromine
atoms, so that its contribution to the radial distribution
function remains the same both in the mono- and in the tri-
bromide salts. The absence, in the di
erence curve, of extra
oscillations with respect to the original curves or of negative
peaks indicates the correctness of this hypothesis.
Theoretical peaks were calculated, by a corresponding
Fourier transformation of the theoretical intensities for pairs
Fig. 3 EDXD profiles of the sample G7 obtained at di
erent of interactions between atoms p and q (Debye functions)
collection angles [eqn. (8)], using the same sharpening factor and the same s
max
J. Mater. Chem., 1997, 7(8), 1331–1337 1333
 View Article Online

value as for the experimental data and assuming the root mean in (C H ) As+Br −,39 and the resulting constant force is
6 54 3
square deviation to be s . lowered significantly from that in Br .
pq 2
The Raman spectrum of Br in benzene,8 yields a funda-
i (s)=∑f f sin(r s) (r s)−1 exp(−0.5 s2 s2) (8) 2
pq pq pq pq pq mental stretching frequency at 306 cm−1, while, for symmetri-
Since our goal was the determination of BrMBr distances cal Br − units (with equal BrMBr distances) such as in (n-
3
within the tribromide ion we considered the Debye functions C H )N+Br −, the actual BrMBr stretching frequency is
4 9 3
only for BrMBr first neighbour interactions. 179 cm−1, and is the average of symmetrically and antisym-
metrically coupled normal modes.39
The vibration frequencies di
er for asymmetrical Br − units
Data analysis 3
and the two stretching modes are observed separately. In
Raman spectra CsBr ,6 which shows two di
erent BrMBr bond distances of
3
2.44 and 2.77 Å, the vibration frequencies were observed at
The Raman spectra of the studied samples are shown in Fig. 4
140 and 208 cm−1. In a more asymmetrical tribromide such
and observed vibration frequencies of the Raman-active bands
as PBr +Br −,7 where the BrMBr bond lengths are in the
are collected in Table 3, where also a comparison to literature 4 3
range 2.39–2.91 Å, the stretching frequencies are observed40 at
data for symmetric tribromides is made. Large shifts in both
249–135 cm−1.
the wavenumber and intensity of the bands are observed and
Apparently, the splitting between the vibration frequencies
appear to correlate with the degree of asymmetry in the two
can be correlated to the degree of asymmetry and can be
BrMBr bond lengths.
considered a qualitative method to deduce whether the tribro-
Published on 01 January 1997. Downloaded on 3/10/2020 3:46:40 PM.

The vibrational spectra of tribromides can be viewed in

mide ion is symmetrical or asymmetrical.
terms of interaction of Br with Br− with the latter acting as
2 Within this simple picture, samples G1 and G7, with stretch-
a Lewis base and Br as a Lewis acid. Upon complexation of
2 ing vibration frequencies of 153, 205 and 140, 223 cm−1,
Br with Br−, BrMBr antibonding molecular orbitals are
2 respectively, contain asymmetrical Br − units, with most prob-
populated and the BrMBr bonds weakened; hence the BrMBr 3
ably, a higher degree of asymmetry in sample G7 (larger
distance is increased from 2.3 Å in Br 37 to 2.53 Å, for instance,
2 splitting between the vibration frequencies).
Sample G3 might contain a symmetrical Br − unit since a
3
coupled vibration frequency is observed at 163 cm−1. This
value is somewhat di
erent from the value of 179 cm−1
reported for (n-C H )N+Br −,39 but this may simply depend
4 9 3
on the BrMBr bond distance, which we have calculated for
the sample G3, but is not reported for (n-C H )N+Br −.
4 9 3
Sample G5 shows somewhat unusual behaviour in that the
two vibration frequencies of 168 and 226 cm−1 do not follow
the usual trend, of a lower stretching frequency for the n
1
vibration and higher frequency for n compared to the average
3
frequency for symmetric units. Furthermore at increasing asym-
metry the intensity of the peak corresponding to the n
3
vibration increases as does as the intensity ratio n /n (see ref. 4
3 1
Fig. 1). For sample G7, instead, the n vibration is more
1
intense. To be sure that both the peaks refer to the sample
and not, for instance, to a symmetric Br − (with a stretching
3
vibration at 168 cm−1), with an impurity yielding a peak at
higher vibration frequency a newly prepared sample was
analysed, which yielded a similar Raman spectrum and di
rac-
tion pattern. In this case we consider the Raman spectrum is
not sucient to discriminate whether the tribromide unit is
asymmetrical. The splitting of the frequencies for sample G7
hints rather at resonance e
ects, which can occur when two
vibrations have closely spaced frequencies

X-Ray di
raction patterns

Observed structure functions, in the form s.i(s).M(s) are shown
in Fig. 5 for samples G1 and G2. Below 3 Å−1 the curves for
the monobromide and tribromide salts show similar structures,
Fig. 4 Raman spectra of the tribromide salts. Sample G3 shows one
peak only and hints at symmetric tribromide. The samples G1, G5
and G7 show two peaks, which suggest the presence of asymmetric
tribromides, though the splitting and the intensity ratios are not
the same

Table 3 Stretching frequencies of the tribromide Raman-active

vibrations

sample cation n /cm−1 n /cm−1 ref.

1 3
G1 CTA 153 205
CTA 153 205 4
G3 CQ 163
G5 CTPA 168 226
G7 CDEA 140 223 Fig. 5 Observed structure function s.i(s).M(s) of samples G2 and G1.
Cs+ 138 213 8 The structure function of the tribromide sample shows much wider
oscillations compared to the corresponding monobromide one.

1334 J. Mater. Chem., 1997, 7(8), 1331–1337

 View Article Online

whereas much wider oscillations are seen for the tribomide in the contribution of a higher scattering species, namely a BrMBr
the range 3–15 Å−1, hinting at the presence of extra inter- interaction. The literature data related to BrMBr distances in
actions not present in the monobromides, most probably due tribomide ions, both for symmetric and asymmetric units are
to the first neighbour BrMBr interactions. No significant in agreement with such a value, therefore we consider that the
di
erence in the reduced intensities is displayed by di
erent comparison of this peak to theoretical peak shapes yields the
samples. BrMBr bond distances.
The radial distribution functions in the Di
form [Di
(r)= Another typical feature in the tribromides RDF is a peak at
D(r)−4pr2r ] are shown in Fig. 6 for the monobromides in ca. 5.1 Å, which we ascribe to Br(1),Br(3) interactions, since
0
and Fig. 7 for the tribromides in the range 0–15 Å. However it is rather intense and has no correspondence in the monobro-
we only analysed the region 0–3 Å where we can distinguish mide curves. The position of this peak confirms that the anion
the first-neighbour BrMBr interactions. The distribution func- Br − has a linear geometry, as suggested in a previous
3
tions of the monobromide samples show two peaks at ca. 1.5 EXAFS study.1
and 2.5 Å arising from C,C, and NMC bond distances (ca. Fig. 8(a) shows the radial distribution function of samples
1.5 Å), and the non-directly bound C,C and NMC distances, G1 and G2 in the range 0–5.5 Å, compared to the theoretical
with sp3 hybridization (ca. 2.5 Å) calculated for the organic peak shapes calculated for the monobromide. In this calcu-
substituents of the ammonium cation. lation we have considered interactions of the type CMX, with
In the radial distribution functions of the tribromides, the X=C, N, O between all the first and second neighbours.
area of the peak at ca. 2.5 Å is much larger, compared to the Particularly for the C,C interaction we considered the CTAB
corresponding monobromide curves, therefore cannot be structure determined by Campanelli and Scaramuzza41 in
Published on 01 January 1997. Downloaded on 3/10/2020 3:46:40 PM.

simply ascribed to the C,C interaction, but it must contain which the CMX distances used in the calculations are reported.
The experimental curve is well reproduced by the calculated
peak shapes in the 0–2.7 Å range, indicating that the considered
interactions are sucient to simulate the RDF of the
monobromide ammonium salts. Therefore the subtraction of
the monobromide RDF from the corresponding tribromide
RDF simply yields the peaks related to BrMBr interactions.
If any change in the cation geometry occurs when coordinated
to a tribromide, instead of a monobromide ion or if some
interactions are present in the monobromide ion, which disap-
pear for the tribromide, this would result, either in a residual
peak and/or in a negative peak.
The peak at ca. 1.5 Å can be used to determine if the
subtraction operation is valid. As shown in Fig. 8(b) for sample
G1 the di
erence radial distribution function is fairly flat in
the range 0–2 Å and the di
erence radial distribution functions
for the other samples show the same characteristics. We can,
therefore, consider that the subtraction of the monobromide

Fig. 6 Radial distribution functions of the form D(r)−4pr2r of the

0
monobromide samples

Fig. 8 (a) Dotted line, D(r) of the sample G2 in the range 0–5.5 Å;
continuous line, D(r) of the sample G1; dashed line, theoretical peak
shape calculated by introducing in the Debye formula the first- and
second-neighbour interactions of the ammonium cation, which is
common to both samples. (b) Di
erence curve between the radial
distribution functions of sample G1 and G2 [D(r) −D(r) ]. The
G1 G2
di
erence curve in the range 0–2 Å is rather flat, therefore all
Fig. 7 Radial distribution functions of the form D(r)−4pr2r of the contributions of the ammonium cation have been removed by
0
tribromides samples subtraction.

J. Mater. Chem., 1997, 7(8), 1331–1337 1335

 View Article Online

curve isolates only the BrMBr contribution to the tribromide

RDF and that the calculation of theoretical peak shapes, which
reproduces the peak at ca. 2.5 Å in the di
erence curve should
give exact BrMBr distances. This operation was performed for
all the samples and the corresponding BrMBr distances are
reported in Table 4, together with mean square root used in
the calculation. In Fig. 9 the experimental and theoretical
di
erence curves have been reported for all the sample pairs,
and show good agreement. The presence of a peak at ca. 5.1 Å
in the tribromide RDF allows us to infer the Br − geometry.1
3
This peak, which we consider correlated to a Br,Br inter-
action, corresponds to the sum of the BrMBr distances in both Fig. 10 Comparison between observed (solid lines) and calculated
symmetric and asymmetric units. The only possible geometry (dotted lines) structure functions s.i(s).M(s) for G1 and G3
that would yield peaks at a distance twice the fundamental
one, is linear.1 The theoretical s.i(s).M(s) curves have been
calculated by introducing only interactions related to the Br −
3
unit, in the Debye formula [eqn. (8)], using the parameters For instance the di
erence between the Br(1)MBr(2) and
reported in Table 4. From this we can see how, despite the Br(2)MBr(3) distances is 0.00 Å in sample G3 and 0.28 Å in
similarities between the samples (they are all ammonium salts sample G7. Furthermore the latter value is comparable to the
Published on 01 January 1997. Downloaded on 3/10/2020 3:46:40 PM.

with a long aliphatic chain) symmetric (G3), slightly asymmet- situation where Cs+ is the counter ion.
ric (G5), and highly asymmetric (G1, G7) structures are all The degree of asymmetry in the tribromide ions is correlated
observed. to their geometry with respect to the cation as well as to its
Finally, theoretical curves are compared to experimental electronegativity. The asymmetry can be viewed as a preferen-
ones in Fig. 10 for samples G1 and G3. tial interaction of one of the external Br atoms with the cation,
It is of interest how the use of these interactions is already which can induce a polarization of the BrMBr bonds. The
sucient to reproduce the oscillations of the structure functions e
ect of the electronegativity is quite evident for instance in
in the entire range, that is, by contrast quite flat for the CsBr ,6 where an electropositive atom such as Cs+, causes a
3
corresponding monobromides, clearly indicating that the Br − high degree of asymmetry.
3
ion gives the main contribution to the scattered intensity. In quaternary ammonium salts with hydrocarbon chains,
electronegativity is not particularly important for the BrMBr
bond polarization and the asymmetry is simply connected to
Results and Discussion
the orientation of the linear Br − unit relative to the nitrogen
3
In the previous sections we showed that the studied samples atom. A completely symmetrical surrounding of the nitrogen
display di
erent degrees of asymmetry of the tribromide ion. atom leads to a symmetric tribromide such as in (n-
C H )N+Br −.39
Table 4 BrMBr bond lengths in Br − and the corresponding root 4 9 3
3 The investigated samples all contain a long aliphatic chain
mean square deviation. s , s and s refer to the Br(1)MBr(2), (the cetyl fragment), which introduces an element of asymmetry
1 2 3
Br(2)MBr(3) and Br(1)MBr(3) bond lengths respectively
around the nitrogen atom, since the other substituents around
sample Br(1)MBr(2) Br(2)MBr(3) Br(1)MBr(3) s =s s the nitrogen are small. In the cetyltrimethylammonium salt
1 2 3 this degree of asymmetry is high and, correspondingly, the
/Å /Å /Å
tribromide asymmetry is high. In the cetyltri-n-propyl
G1 2.45 2.66 5.11 0.08 0.15 ammonium salt the length of the substituents is already
G3 2.52 2.52 5.04 0.11 0.15 sucient to prevent a preferential interaction of one Br end
G5 2.48 2.55 5.03 0.10 0.14
with the nitrogen and this tribromide is almost symmetric.
G7 2.38 2.66 5.04 0.08 0.15
The behaviour of the cetylquinuclidinium ammonium salt is
interesting, in that despite its apparent geometrical asymmetry
a symmetric tribromide is observed. Most probably the ali-
phatic chains are forced into a ring geometry, leaving space
for the nitrogen atom to adopt a similar interaction with both
external Br atoms.
The high degree of asymmetry for the cetyldimethyl(2-
hydroxyethyl )ammonium is not surprising, since the geometri-
cal asymmetry around the nitrogen atom is accompanied by
the presence of an electronegative element, oxygen, which can
polarize the BrMBr bonds.
It is interesting to note the good correspondence between
the Raman spectra and the X-ray di
raction patterns, with a
single stretching vibration frequency for symmetric tribromides
and split vibration frequencies for highly asymmetric tribrom-
ide units. The slight asymmetry in sample G5 might have
induced, as previously suggested, a Fermi resonance.
In summary we studied the dependence of the degree of
asymmetry of tribromides on the substituents of ammonium
salts, by Raman spectroscopy and large angle scattering. The
results show that the electronegativity of the ammonium
substituent can polarize one Br external atom, yielding BrMBr
bonds of di
erent length.
However even with non-polar substituents it is possible to
Fig. 9 Di
erence radial distribution curves: solid lines, experimental obtain asymmetric tribromides, depending on the steric hin-
curves; dotted lines, theoretical curves drance and on the possibility for the tribromide units to

1336 J. Mater. Chem., 1997, 7(8), 1331–1337

 View Article Online

interact with the nitrogen atom either asymmetrically or G. Paschina, G. Piccaluga and G. Pinna, J. Mater. Sci. L ett., 1988,
symmetrically. In all cases the tribromide geometry was linear. 7, 407.
18 T. Egami, J. Mater. Sci., 1978, 13, 2587.
19 T. Egami, in Glassy metals I, ed. H. J. Gunterodt and H. Beck,
Dr. Luca Antonio Petrilli and Mr. Franco Dianetti of the Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1981, p. 25.
Servizio Microanalisi, Area della Ricerca di Roma of the CNR 20 G. Fritsch and J. Keimel, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 1991, 134, 888.
21 F. Haydu, Phys. Status Solidi A, 1980, 60, 365.
are acknowledged for their kind contribution. 22 T. Egami, J. Appl. Phys., 1979, 50, 1564.
23 A. Mosset, J. Galy, E. Coronado, M. Drillon and D. Beltran, J. Am
Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 2864.
References 24 R. Caminiti, C. Munoz Roca, D. Beltran-Porter and A. Rossi, Z.
Naturforsch., T eil A, 1988, 43, 591.
1 H. Oyanagy, M. Tokumoto, T. Ishiguro, H. Shirakawa, H. 25 A. Capobianchi, A. M. Paoletti, G. Pennesi, G. Rossi, R. Caminiti
Nemoto, T. Matsuita, M. Ito and H. Kuroda, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., and C. Ercolani, Inorg. Chem., 1994, 33, 4635.
1984, 53, 4044. 26 D. Atzei, D. De Filippo, A. Rossi, R. Caminiti and C. Sadun,
2 F. Demartin, P. Deplano, F. A. Devillanova, F. Isaia, V. Lippolis Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 1995, 51, 11.
and G. Verani, Inorg. Chem., 1993, 32, 3694. 27 R. Germani, P. P. Ponti, T. Romeo, G. Savelli, N. Spreti,
3 E. E. Having, K. H. Boswijk and E. H. Wiebenga, Acta G. Cerichelli, L. Luchetti, G. Mancini and C. A. Bunton, J. Phys.
Crystallogr., 1954, 7, 487. Org. Chem., 1989, 2, 553.
4 G. R. Burns and R. M. Renner, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 1991, 28 G. Cerichelli, G. Mancini and L. Luchetti, T etrahedron, 1994, 50,
47, 991. 3797.
5 C. Romers and E. W. M. Keulemans, Proc. K Ned. Akad. Wet., Ser 29 (a) R. Caminiti, C. Sadun, V. Rossi, F. Cilloco and R. Felici, XXV
Published on 01 January 1997. Downloaded on 3/10/2020 3:46:40 PM.

National Congress of Chemical Physics. Cagliari, 1991; (b) Pat.

B, 1958, 61, 345.
01261484, June 23, 1993.
6 G. L. Breneman and R. D. Willet, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B, 1969,
30 M. Carbone, R. Caminiti and C. Sadun, J. Mater. Chem., 1996,
25, 1073.
6, 1709.
7 G. L. Breneman and R. D. Willet, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B, 1967, 31 K. Nishikawa and T. Iijima, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1984, 57, 1750.
23, 467. 32 K. Nishikawa and N. Kitagawa, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1980, 53,
8 D. W. Kalina, J. W. Lyding, M. T. Ratajack, C. R. Kannewurf and 2804.
T. J. Marks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1980, 102, 7854. 33 V. Petkov and Y. Woseda, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 1993, 26, 295.
9 J. C. Evans and G. Y. S. Yo, Inorg. Chem., 1967, 6, 1483. 34 R. Caminiti, G. Johansson and I. Toth, Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. A,
10 A. Schnittke, H. Stegemann, H. Fuellbier and J. Gabrusenoks, 1986, 40, 435.
J. Raman Spectrosc., 1991, 22, 627. 35 G. Johansson and R. Caminiti, Z. Naturforsch., T eil A, 1986, 41,
11 G. Cerichelli, C. Grande, L. Luchetti, G. Mancini and C. A. 1325.
Bunton, J. Org. Chem., 1987, 52, 5167. 36 R. Caminiti, F. Cilloco and R. Felici, Mol. Phys., 1992, 75, 681.
12 M. T. Bianchi, G. Cerichelli, G. Mancini and F. Marinelli, 37 C. Andreani, F. Cilloco, L. Nencini, D. Rocca and R. N. Sinclair,
T etrahedron L ett., 1984, 25, 5205. Mol. Phys., 1985, 55, 887.
13 G. Cerichelli, L. Luchetti and G. Mancini, T etrahedron L ett., 1989, 38 G. Ollis, V. J. James, D. Ollis and M. P. Boogard, Cryst. Struct.
30, 6209. Commun., 1976, 5, 39.
14 G. Cerichelli, C. Grande, L. Luchetti and G. Mancini, Org. Chem., 39 W. Gabes and H. Gerding, J. Mol. Struct., 1972, 14, 267.
1991, 56, 3025. 40 W. Gabes and H. Gerding, Recl. T rav. Chim. Pays-Bas, 1971, 90,
15 G. Cerichelli, L. Luchetti and G. Mancini, T etrahedron, 1996, 52, 157.
2465. 41 A. R. Campanelli and R. Scaramuzza, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C,
16 J. J. Del Val, L. Esquivias, P. L. Olano and F. Sanz, J. Non- 1986, 42, 1380.
Crystalline Solids, 1985, 70, 211.
17 A. Corrias, G. Ennas, G. Licheri, G. Marongiu, A. Musinu, Paper 6/04726B; Received 5th July, 1996

J. Mater. Chem., 1997, 7(8), 1331–1337 1337