60 - 17 0190 BR
60 - 17 0190 BR
60 - 17 0190 BR
Brief Report
1
Osaka Occupational Health Service Center, Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association, Japan, 2Kanto Regional Safety
and Health Service Center, Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association, Japan, 3 National Institute of Occupational
Safety and Health, Japan and 4Occupational Health Research and Development Center, Japan Industrial Safety and Health
Association, Japan
Abstract: Objectives: The purpose of this research was performance liquid chromatography, Personal exposure
to develop a method for monitoring personal exposure to monitoring
benzyl violet 4B (BV) and direct blue 15 (DB) in work-
place air for risk assessment. Methods: We evaluated
the utility of the proposed method by examining the fol- Introduction
lowing: recovery; method limit of quantification ; repro-
ducibility; and storage stability of the samples. Results: Benzyl violet 4B (BV) and direct blue 15 (DB) were
An air sampling cassette containing a glass fiber filter listed as target chemicals in a project on workplace risk
was chosen as the sampler. BV and DB were extracted assessment carried out by the Ministry of Health, Labour
from the sampler filters with a solution of water and and Welfare (MHLW) of Japan in 20151) because they
methanol ( 7 : 3, v / v ) and then analyzed by a high- have been classified as Group 2B (possibly carcinogenic
performance liquid chromatograph equipped with a to humans) compounds by the International Agency for
photo-diode array detector. The overall recoveries from Research on Cancer2,3) and by the Japan Society for Occu-
spiked samplers were 94-102% and 94-99% for BV and pational Health (JSOH) 4) . Occupational exposure limits
DB, respectively. The recovery after seven days of stor- for BV and DB have not been proposed by the JSOH or
age at 4℃ exceeded 95%. The method limits of quantifi- by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial
cation were 0.250 and 1.25 μg/sample for BV and DB, Hygienists.
respectively. The relative standard deviations, which rep- To our knowledge, a method for monitoring personal
resent the overall reproducibility defined as precision, exposure to BV or DB in workplace air has not been re-
were 0.6-4.1% and 0.8-2.9% for BV and DB, respec- ported. The aim of the present study was to develop and
tively. Conclusions: The proposed method enables 4 h validate a personal exposure monitoring method for BV
personal exposure monitoring of BV and DB at concen- and DB in workplace air with the sampling capacity and
3 3
trations of 1-2,000 μg/m for BV and 5-2,000 μg/m for sensitivity required for the MHLW exposure survey.
DB, with a 240 l sampling. Thus, the proposed method is
useful for estimating worker exposure to BV and DB. Materials and Methods
(J Occup Health 2018; 60: 192-195)
doi: 10.1539/joh.17-0190-BR Materials
BV and DB were purchased from Tokyo Kasei Kogyo
Key words : Benzyl violet 4 B, Direct blue 15, High- (Tokyo, Japan). Acetonitrile, methanol, ammonium dihy-
drogen phosphate and disodium hydrogen phosphate were
Received July 18, 2017; Accepted November 1, 2017 of analytical grade or better (for high-performance liquid
Published online in J-STAGE December 19, 2017 chromatography). An air sampling cassette (Catalog No.
Correspondence to : A. Takeuchi, Osaka Occupational Health Service 225-3LF, SKC Inc., Eighty Four, PA, USA) containing a
Center, Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association, 2-3-8 Tosabori, glass fiber filter ( 37 mm in diameter, Catalog No. AP
Nishi-ku, Osaka 550-0001, Japan (e-mail: [email protected]) 2004200, Merck Millipore Ltd., Cork, Ireland) was used
Akito Takeuchi, et al.: Personal exposure monitoring method for BV and DB in air 193
uAU uAU
25000 10000
BV (A) (B)
20000 7500 BV
592 nm DB 620 nm
15000
5000
10000
DB 2500
5000
0
0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 min 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 min
uAU uAU
25000 10000
20000
(C) (D)
7500
592 nm 620 nm
15000
5000
10000
2500
5000
0
0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 min 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 min
Fig. 1. Chromatograms of a solution extracted from a glass fiber filter spiked with a mixed standard solution containing 25.0 μg
of benzyl violet 4B (BV) and 25.0 μg of direct blue 15 (DB) at (A) 592 nm and (B) 620 nm. Chromatograms of a solu-
tion extracted from a blank glass fiber filter at (C) 592 nm and (D) 620 nm.
Table 1. Recovery of BV and DB from spiked sampler Recovery of the glass fiber filter
The minimum sampling capacity required for the
Spiked BV DB
MHLW exposure survey is 240 l (1 l/min, 240 min), and
amount Recovery a RSD b Recovery a RSD b this was evaluated based on the results of the recovery
(μg) (%) (%) (%) (%) test. The overall recoveries from spiked samplers were
0.250 94 ± 3.8 4.1 –±– – 94-102% and 94-99% for BV and DB, respectively (Ta-
1.25 97 ± 1.6 1.6 94 ± 2.8 2.9 ble 1). Therefore, the glass fiber filter is suitable as a sam-
5.00 100 ± 0.6 0.6 95 ± 0.8 0.9 pler for the MHLW exposure survey of BV and DB.
25.0 102 ± 0.7 0.7 99 ± 0.8 0.8
250 100 ± 0.9 0.9 94 ± 0.8 0.8 Storage stability of samples
500 99 ± 1.3 1.3 97 ± 1.3 1.4 Storage stabilities were evaluated by comparing the
amounts of BV and DB remaining in stored samples with
A standard solution (25 μl) containing benzyl violet 4B the amounts of BV and DB in the samples analyzed im-
(BV) and direct blue 15 (DB) diluted in a mixed solution
mediately after preparation. After seven days storage, the
of water and methanol (7:3, v/v) was spiked onto the glass
fiber filter of a sampler. Simultaneously, room air was
recoveries from all the spiked samplers exceeded 95%,
drawn through the sampler at a flow rate of 1 l/min for 240 indicating that BV and DB on a glass fiber filter can be
min. The spiked amounts correspond to air concentrations stored for at least seven days at 4℃.
of approximately 1-2000 μg/m3 for BV and 5-2000 μg/m3
for DB. The recovery obtained with 0.250 μg of DB was Method limit of quantification and reproducibility
not examined. The calibration curves for BV and DB exhibited linear-
a
Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 5). ity in the ranges of 0.0500-100 μg/ml and 0.250-100 μg/
b
Relative standard deviation ml, respectively, with correlation coefficients greater than
0.999. From the calibration curves, the instrumental limit
of quantification, defined as 10 times the standard devia-
tion (n = 5) of the peak area of the lowest standard, was
0.153 μg/sample for BV and 0.798 μg/ sample for DB.
From the results of the recovery test, the method limit of
Akito Takeuchi, et al.: Personal exposure monitoring method for BV and DB in air 195