Project Data: Project Name Project Number Author Description Date 04-Nov-23 Design Code EN
Project Data: Project Name Project Number Author Description Date 04-Nov-23 Design Code EN
Project Data: Project Name Project Number Author Description Date 04-Nov-23 Design Code EN
Project no:
Author:
Project data
Project name
Project number
Author
Description
Date 04-Nov-23
Design code EN
Material
Steel S 355, S 235
Concrete C25/30
1 / 15
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Design
Name Column to rafter connection (90 degree)
Description
Analysis Stress, strain/ simplified loading
2 / 15
Project:
Project no:
Author:
3 / 15
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Cross-sections
Name Material
10 - BoxFl100x(50/50) S 235
13 -
S 235
I100x50x3.5x.4.8(Iw100x50)
4 / 15
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Cross-sections
Name Material Drawing
10 - BoxFl100x(50/50) S 235
13 -
S 235
I100x50x3.5x.4.8(Iw100x50)
Check
Summary
Name Value Status
Analysis 100.0% OK
Plates 0.1 < 5.0% OK
Welds 98.0 < 100% OK
Buckling Not calculated
5 / 15
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Plates
Thickness σEd εPl σcEd
Name Loads Status
[mm] [MPa] [%] [MPa]
Main T-tfl 1 2.5 LE1 89.4 0.0 0.0 OK
Main T-bfl 1 2.5 LE1 174.3 0.0 0.0 OK
Main T-w 1 2.5 LE1 167.4 0.0 0.0 OK
Main T-w 2 2.5 LE1 192.4 0.0 0.0 OK
I100x50x3.5x4.8-tfl 1 5.0 LE1 141.7 0.0 0.0 OK
I100x50x3.5x4.8-bfl 1 5.0 LE1 196.3 0.1 0.0 OK
I100x50x3.5x4.8-w 1 4.0 LE1 55.7 0.0 0.0 OK
ST1-tfl 1 2.5 LE1 88.6 0.0 0.0 OK
ST1-bfl 1 2.5 LE1 18.1 0.0 0.0 OK
ST1-w 1 2.5 LE1 71.3 0.0 0.0 OK
ST1-w 2 2.5 LE1 81.5 0.0 0.0 OK
ST2-tfl 1 2.5 LE1 71.2 0.0 0.0 OK
ST2-bfl 1 2.5 LE1 23.9 0.0 0.0 OK
ST2-w 1 2.5 LE1 57.0 0.0 0.0 OK
ST2-w 2 2.5 LE1 40.6 0.0 0.0 OK
Design data
fy εlim
Material
[MPa] [%]
S 235 235.0 5.0
6 / 15
Project:
Project no:
Author:
7 / 15
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Design data
βw σw,Rd 0.9 σ
[-] [MPa] [MPa]
S 235 0.80 360.0 259.2
Butt welds are assumed as full penetration and are not checked. Their resistance is assumed the same as that of the welded
member -EN 1993 - 1 - 8 - 4.7.1.
Butt welds are assumed as full penetration and are not checked. Their resistance is assumed the same as that of the welded
member -EN 1993 - 1 - 8 - 4.7.1.
8 / 15
Project:
Project no:
Author:
⊥
∥
171.6 MPa
where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
βw = 0.80
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
;
σ⊥,Rd
)= 47.7 %
⊥
∥
264.7 MPa
where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
βw = 0.80
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
;
σ⊥,Rd
)= 73.5 %
9 / 15
Project:
Project no:
Author:
⊥
∥
250.4 MPa
where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
βw = 0.80
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
;
σ⊥,Rd
)= 69.6 %
⊥
∥
352.9 MPa
where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
βw = 0.80
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
γM 2 = 1.25 – Safety factor
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
;
σ⊥,Rd
)= 98.0 %
10 / 15
Project:
Project no:
Author:
⊥ ∥
40.6 MPa
where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
βw = 0.80
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
;
σ⊥,Rd
)= 11.3 %
⊥ ∥
34.2 MPa
where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
βw = 0.80
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
;
σ⊥,Rd
)= 9.5 %
11 / 15
Project:
Project no:
Author:
⊥
∥
186.2 MPa
where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
βw = 0.80
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
γM 2 = 1.25 – Safety factor
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
;
σ⊥,Rd
)= 51.7 %
⊥
∥
204.4 MPa
where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
βw = 0.80
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
;
σ⊥,Rd
)= 56.8 %
12 / 15
Project:
Project no:
Author:
⊥
∥
12.6 MPa
where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
βw = 0.80
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
;
σ⊥,Rd
)= 3.5 %
⊥
∥
26.7 MPa
where:
fu = 360.0 MPa – Ultimate strength
βw = 0.80
– appropriate correlation factor taken from Table 4.1
γM 2 = 1.25 – Safety factor
Stress utilization
∣σ⊥ ∣
Ut = max( σσw,Ed
w,Rd
;
σ⊥,Rd
)= 7.4 %
Buckling
Buckling analysis was not calculated.
Bill of material
Manufacturing operations
Plates Welds Length
Name Shape Nr. Bolts Nr.
[mm] [mm] [mm]
CUT1 Double fillet: a = 3.0 203.9
Fillet: a = 3.0 94.2
CUT2
Fillet: a = 3.0 94.2
Butt: a = 2.5 100.0
CUT3 Fillet: a = 3.0 95.0
Fillet: a = 3.0 95.0
13 / 15
Project:
Project no:
Author:
Welds
Throat thickness Leg size Length
Type Material
[mm] [mm] [mm]
Double fillet S 235 3.0 4.2 203.9
Fillet S 235 3.0 4.2 189.2
Fillet S 235 3.0 4.2 189.2
Butt S 235 - - 100.0
Symbol explanation
Symbol Symbol explanation
εPl Strain
σEd Eq. stress
fy Yield strength
εlim Limit of plastic strain
σw,Ed Equivalent stress
σw,Rd Equivalent stress resistance
σ⏊ Perpendicular stress
τ|| Shear stress parallel to weld axis
τ⏊ Shear stress perpendicular to weld axis
0.9 σw,Rd Perpendicular stress resistance - 0.9*fu/γM2
βw Corelation factor EN 1993-1-8 tab. 4.1
Ut Utilization
Utc Weld capacity utilization
Code settings
Item Value Unit Reference
γM0 1.00 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM1 1.00 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM2 1.25 - EN 1993-1-1: 6.1
γM3 1.25 - EN 1993-1-8: 2.2
γC 1.50 - EN 1992-1-1: 2.4.2.4
γInst 1.20 - EN 1992-4: Table 4.1
Joint coefficient βj 0.67 - EN 1993-1-8: 6.2.5
Effective area - influence of mesh size 0.10 -
Friction coefficient - concrete 0.25 - EN 1993-1-8
Friction coefficient in slip-resistance 0.30 - EN 1993-1-8 tab 3.7
Limit plastic strain 0.05 - EN 1993-1-5
Weld stress evaluation Plastic redistribution
Detailing No
Distance between bolts [d] 2.20 - EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.3
Distance between bolts and edge [d] 1.20 - EN 1993-1-8: tab 3.3
14 / 15
Project:
Project no:
Author:
15 / 15