I3-Tests For Nonabsolute Convergence-Readings
I3-Tests For Nonabsolute Convergence-Readings
I3-Tests For Nonabsolute Convergence-Readings
and note that absolute convergence implies convergence of the series but not the other way around.
There are many series such as
∞ ∞
X (−1)n X (−1)n
√
3
and √ ,
n=1 n2 n=2
n2 − 1
which are convergent but not absolutely. So how are we going to prove or determine the convergence
of such type of series? We present here some tests for this case and show later that indeed, these
are convergent series.
Proof:
Let {sn } be the corresponding sequence of partial sums for the series (−1)n+1 zn . To prove
P
the theorem, we will consider the subsequence of {sn } with even indices and show that this is
convergent. Next, we will prove that the other half of {sn } is also convergent and converges to the
same limit.
Consider
s2n = z1 − z2 + z3 − z4 + · · · + z2n−1 − z2n
(1)
= (z1 − z2 ) + (z3 − z4 ) + · · · + (z2n−1 − z2n ).
Since zk − zk+1 ≥ 0, then each of the grouped terms in (1) is also nonnegative. This implies that
the subsequence {s2n } is increasing. Moreover, (1) can be rewritten as
and from this, it also follows that s2n ≤ z1 for all n ∈ N which makes this subsequence bounded.
Thus, from the Monotone Convergence Theorem, {s2n } converges in R.
Let s = lim s2n . We show next, that
{s2n+1 } → s. (2)
Indeed, s = lim s2n means that for every ε > 0, there exists N1 ∈ N such that for n ≥ N1 ,
ε
|s2n − s| < . (3)
2
1
Also, from the assumption that lim zn = 0, for every ε > 0, there exists N2 ∈ N such that for
n ≥ N2 ,
ε
|z2n+1 | < , (4)
2
by the uniqueness of the limit. Take K = sup{N1 , N2 } so that for every n ≥ K, in view of (3) and
(4), we get
|s2n+1 − s| = |s2n + z2n+1 − s|
ε ε
≤ |s2n − s| + |z2n+1 | < + = ε,
2 2
which proves (2). Hence, every partial sum of an odd number of terms is also within an ε−neighborhood
n is large enough. Thus, the convergence of {sn } follows since ε is arbitrary. Therefore, the
of s if P
series (−1)n+1 zn is convergent.
Proof:
Since yk = sk − sk−1 for k = 1, 2, . . ., the left side of (5) is the same as
m
X
xk (sk − sk−1 ).
k=n+1
Now, separating the terms with sn and sm and collecting the terms multiplying sn+1 , . . . , sm−1
gives the right side of (5).
Proof:
Suppose |sn | ≤ B for all n ∈ N for some B > 0 and let m > n. Using Abel’s Lemma and the
fact that xk − xk+1 ≥ 0, it follows that
m
X m−1
X
xk yk = (xm sm − xn+1 sn ) + (xk − xk+1 )sk
k=n+1 k=n+1
m−1
X
≤ |xm sm | + |xn+1 sn | + |(xk − xk+1 )sk |
k=n+1
m−1
X
≤ (xm + xn+1 )B + (xk − xk+1 )B
k=n+1
= [(xm + xn+1 ) + (xn+1 − xm )] B
= 2xn+1 B.
2
∞
X
Since lim xk = 0, the convergence of xn yn follows now from the Cauchy Criterion for Series.
n=1
∞
X ∞
X ∞
X
xn yn 6= xn yn .
n=1 n=1 n=1
∞
X
2. The converse of the of the theorem is not true. That is, the convergence of xn yn does not
n=1
∞
X
necessarily imply both xn decreasing to 0 and the sequence of partial sums {sn } of yn is
n=1
∞
X 1
bounded. One can take for example the series for p ∈ (0, 1]. Let
np+1
n=1
1 1
xn yn = · .
n np
∞
X
Both xn and yn decreases to 0 but neither of the sequence of the partial sums of xn or
n=1
∞
X
yn is bounded.
n=1
Another test we can apply to determine the convergence of a series is given by the next theorem.
.
Theorem 4 (Abel’s Test). Let X = {xn } be a convergent monotone sequence and suppose the
∞
X ∞
X
series yn is convergent. Thus, the series xn yn is also convergent.
n=1 n=1
Proof:
We will use the Dirichlet’s Test to prove this property.
Let {xn } be decreasing convergent sequence with limit x. Let
un = xn − x, n ∈ N,
xn yn = xyn + un yn .
∞
X ∞
X
From the Dirichlet Test, un yn is convergent since yn is convergent. Furthermore, we also
n=1 n=1
∞
X ∞
X ∞
X
have xyn convergent because yn is. We then conclude that xn yn is also convergent.
n=1 n=1 n=1
On the other hand, for the case that {xn } is increasing with limit x, we let vn = x − xn for
n ∈ N so that {vn } decreases to 0. This provides xn = x − vn and that
xn yn = xyn − vn yn .
3
Remark 2.2. The information stated in Remark 2.1 are also true for Abel’s Test.
Before we deal with more series examples, in addition to the steps given in the previous section,
on has to take note of the following steps/reminders:
1. Test for possible divergence by using the simple test for divergence due to the Term Test.
That is, if the limit of the terms of the series is not 0, then the series diverges.
2. Test for possible absolute convergence by using any of the tests for absolute convergence. If
absolutely convergent, then the series is convergent, otherwise, proceed to the next step.
(i) Since
x 1 x
2 sin (cos(x) + · · · + cos(nx)) = sin n+ x − sin ,
2 2 2
it follows that if x 6= 2kπ (k ∈ N), then
n + 12 x − sin x
sin 2 1
| cos(x) + · · · + cos(nx)| = ≤ .
2 sin x2 x
sin 2
Hence, the Dirichlet Test implies that if {an } is decreasing with lim an = 0, then the series
∞
X
an cos(nx)
n=1
4
∞ ∞ √ ∞
X
n 2n4 + 7 X
n+1 n X an
4. (−1) 6. (−1) 8. (−1)n , a ∈ [0, 1)
6n9 − 2n ln n n
n=1 n=2 n=1
∞ ∞
X 2n2 X 22n n2
5. (−1)n 7.
n=1
n2 + 1
n=2
en n! ln2 n
Solution:
1. We proceed in several steps.
| cos(n)| 1
0< ≤ 2,
n2 n
5
∞
X 1
since | cos(n)| ≤ 1 for all n ∈ N. Since is a convergent p−series with p = 2 > 1, then
n2
n=1
∞
X | cos(n)|
the series is also convergent by the Comparison Test. This means that the series
n2
n=1
∞
X cos(n)
is absolutely convergent, and hence, convergent.
n2
n=1
1
One can also apply the result obtained in Example1 (i) above by taking an = 2 to conclude
n
∞
X cos(n)
the convergence of the series via Dirichlet’s Test.
n2
n=1
6
1 2n4 + 7
Let yn = and x n = . Thus,
n5 6n9 − 2n
7
xn 2+ n4 1
lim = lim 2 = < ∞.
n→∞ yn n→∞ 6 − 3
n5
∞ ∞
X X 2n4 + 7
This means that the series xn = is also convergent by the Limit Compar-
6n9 − 2n
n=1 n=1
∞
X 2n4 + 7
ison Test. Therefore, the series (−1)n is absolutely convergent, which makes it
6n9 − 2n
n=1
convergent.
∞
X 2n2 2n2
5. Note that the series (−1)n is alternating with z n = . Since
n2 + 1 n2 + 1
n=1
2n2
lim zn = lim = 2 6= 0,
n→∞ n→∞ n2 + 1
then
2n2
n
lim (−1) 2 6= 0,
n→∞ n +1
and so, the series diverges by failing the Term Test.
6. One can show that the terms of the series does not converge to 0 so that the series is divergent.
1 22n n2
7. Let xn = and y n = .
ln2 n en n!
(i) Taking the derivative of xn with respect to n yields
d −2
(xn ) = < 0,
dn n ln3 n
1
for n ≥ 2, so that {xn } is a decreasing sequence. Moreover, lim xn = lim = 0.
n→∞ n→∞ ln2 n
∞ ∞
X X 22n n2
(ii) Consider now the series yn = . One has
en n!
n=1 n=1
yn+1 22 (n + 1)
lim = lim = 0 < 1.
n→∞ yn n→∞ en2
∞
X
Thus, yn is convergent by the corollary to the Ratio Test.
n=1
∞
X 22n n2
Hence, the convergence of the series follows from either Dirichlet’s or Abel’s
n=2
en n! ln2 n
Test.
7
1
(ii) The convergence of the series can also be shown by taking yn = (−1)n an and xn =
n
and then use either Dirichlet’s or Abel’s Test (exercise).
∞
X an
(iii) Taking the series of the absolute values gives us . The absolute convergence
n
n=1
follows then, by applying the corollary to the Root Test (exercise) and so the series is
convergent.