Struggling with writing a thesis on the Problem of Evil? You're not alone.

Crafting a comprehensive
and insightful thesis on such a complex philosophical topic can be an arduous task. It requires a deep
understanding of various philosophical concepts, critical thinking skills, and the ability to articulate
complex ideas effectively.

The Problem of Evil is a profound philosophical dilemma that has puzzled thinkers for centuries.
Exploring the existence of evil in a world supposedly governed by a benevolent and omnipotent
deity raises profound questions about the nature of morality, the existence of God, and the inherent
contradictions within religious beliefs.

Navigating through the vast literature on this topic, analyzing different philosophical perspectives,
and presenting a coherent argument in your thesis can be overwhelming. It demands meticulous
research, careful analysis, and precise writing to address the intricacies of the debate and offer
meaningful insights.

If you find yourself grappling with the complexities of writing a thesis on the Problem of Evil, fear
not. Help is at hand. Consider seeking assistance from professionals who specialize in academic
writing.

Helpwriting.net offers expert assistance tailored to your specific needs. Our team of experienced
writers understands the nuances of philosophical discourse and can help you craft a compelling thesis
that meets the highest academic standards. Whether you need assistance with research, structuring
your argument, or polishing your writing, we're here to support you every step of the way.

Don't let the challenges of writing a thesis on the Problem of Evil hold you back. Trust ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔ to provide you with the guidance and support you need to succeed. Reach out
to us today and take the first step towards achieving your academic goals.
Ireneaus claims that the evil and suffering will eventually be overcome and everyone will attain
God’s likeness and reside in Heaven. This document also includes a bullet-point essay plan to help
students understand how to structure their essays for maximum marks. The next example illustrates
a situation where lack of free-will constitutes a loss. By continuing, you agree to our Terms and
Conditions. It also takes away the incentive to develop into God’s likeness which Irenaeus regarded
of utmost importance. Where Augustine fails to provide room for belief in evolution, Ireneaus
manages it and while Augustine cannot provide a logical explanation for the origin of evil, Irenaeus
provides a stable reason for it. By continuing, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. It was really
easy to contact her and respond very fast as well. ”. Imagine a class of philosophy students facing
the prospect of an end of course examination. To sum up therefore the philosophical problem arises
because of the difficulty in reconciling the creation of God and his care for his creation with the
existence of evil we find in the world. As in the example of adultery, one has the ability and the
choice to decide against the act, or to risk the known and unknown consequences of that act. If he
didn’t enable this, we could never attain God’s likeness as according to Ireneaus it requires willing
co-operation. If the only component to an issue was the good of that issue, then there would be no
cause in which to believe. Therefore, St. Augustine's theories of the problem of evil came about. This
is the view of the theist but not the deist - the deist would maintain that God created the world and
then left it to its own devices - the existence of evil in the world is not therefore a problem for these
people. 3. Theism would also maintain that there is only one single God and that there is not such
thing as Dualism - the idea that there are two opposing forces battling against each other in a war
over good and evil. David Hume’s work has inspired a great many philosophical discussions on the
existence of God. F. H. Bradley a British idealist philospher of the 19th century is quoted by Nelson
Pike as writing. The existence of a Utopian universe implies a general claim that virtue is always
exercised but some virtues can never be exercised. New York: Cambridge University Press. 23
December 2008. His treatise speaks to the logical reasoning that questions why God would allow evil
if He is good, and if He is omnipotent, why does He not use that power to change the universe to a
place free of evil. In fact, philosophy is derived from a word that means love of wisdom (Fixico 2).
This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have
purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and
conditions. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies. In other
words, because God only does that which is logical, He could not confer free-will and also prohibit
evil. The issue is explored through the perceived power and limitations by which an omnipotent God
might or might not be limited. The purpose of knowing the difference cannot be clarified so easily,
however, it is clear that to recognize what is preferable, it is necessary to experience what is not.
Instead it compromises His omnibenevolence and reduces Him to little more than a vindictive old
man — albeit an old man with supreme powers. The resources are numbered to show the order in
which I have always taught them. One man can only achieve so much and yet, if only for the sake of
generations to come, mankind simply cannot refuse the struggle. In Buddhism there is no Supreme
Being to co-exist with evil. In the simplest form of this argument is that God is omnipotent, he is
wholly good and yet evil exists (Rowe 30).
Skeptical theists are thus not supposed to be skeptical about theism; rather, they are theists who are
skeptical about something else. If there any omissions in the notes please do get in touch and I will
send an updated copy. This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only
customers who have purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it
violates our terms and conditions. Reconciling an omnipotent and omnibenevolent God with the
existence of evil (for we know from empirical evidence that evil undoubtedly exists) can leave us on
the horns of a dilemma. Reviews Select overall rating (no rating) Your rating is required to reflect
your happiness. Humans also couldn’t be created in a paradise or else qualities such as courage
would not be attainable and there would be no development as good and evil would be
indistinguishable. Even in the world we live in we do not understand many things such as what is
behind the gravitational force or the exact role of subatomic particles. For moral and spiritual growth
always comes through challenge and response; and our world is a challenging environment. As a
result of many roles and tools that philosophy plays, different meanings of philosophy have arisen.
Miller explains, “Anything created by God would have to be less than God just by virtue of being
dependent on him, and this means immediately that it must be less than perfect.”. Augustine to
argue that God is still all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-loving in the face of evil. Because traditional
skeptical theism and DePoe’s positive skeptical theism constitute the most promising extant
strategies for answering my argument, the argument constitutes a serious challenge for the Christian
theist. Get this resource as part of a bundle and save up to 17% A bundle is a package of resources
grouped together to teach a particular topic, or a series of lessons, in one place. One notable
philosopher with a rather radical solution to the issue is the very influential John Stuart Mill.
However a theist would maintain that God is wholly and perfectly good and indeed is the source of
all goodness. The issue is explored through the perceived power and limitations by which an
omnipotent God might or might not be limited. According to this argument, there is no way both of
these assertions can be true. What explains the suffering of other creatures, i.e. animals? Could
character-building in itself be valuable enough to justify all the evil and misery in the world. As the
relevancy of evil become apparent, in that it is necessary in order to lift the supremacy of good, that is
essential in the practice of free will, and that it can provide meaningful experiences that transcend the
suffering it can oppose, it becomes necessary to decide if there is indeed an oppositional relationship
between good and evil, or if they are intrinsically connected, one not having any value without the
other. The ability to eradicate evil is negated by the consequences of that elimination. See Full PDF
Download PDF See Full PDF Download PDF Related Papers Evil and Evidence John Hawthorne
The problem of evil presents the most prominent argument against the existence of God. The reason
that evil continues is either because that force cannot or that it will not destroy its adversarial force.
Penelhum quotes Pike as he describes three propositions that are extensions of Mackie’s theory. As
the problem is weighed, another concept is brought out. Where Augustine fails to provide room for
belief in evolution, Ireneaus manages it and while Augustine cannot provide a logical explanation for
the origin of evil, Irenaeus provides a stable reason for it. Write a review Update existing review
Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. We are going to learn of many explanations
for this problem but simply speaking these approaches can be divided into two areas: The Irenean
tradition This is a theodicy developed from the work of Ireneus (130 - 202) which gives God some
partial responsibility for evil in the world but attempts to show that there are good reasons which
make evil inevitable. Augustine confessed to disordering these loves himself in his Confessions by
saying, “Because my will was perverse it changed to lust, and lust yielded to become habit, and habit
not resisted became necessity.”. One man can only achieve so much and yet, if only for the sake of
generations to come, mankind simply cannot refuse the struggle. It seeks not to disapprove Gods
existence by looking for contradiction between God and evil existence.. This argument does not
conclude with proves that there is no God (Rowe 45).
It is not required that they depart from sin, only that they accept that He is the way to salvation. John
L. Mackie has written on the topic of evil with the intent of examining the issue from a balanced
perspective. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some
feedback. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?4.00 (no rating) 0
reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?4.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last
updated 22 February 2018 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through
linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest jerseyperson 4.59 317 reviews Not the right
resource. This scheme then requires that, in order to provide incentive for improvement, there is the
possibility of suffering. Empty reply does not make any sense for the end user Submit reply Cancel
Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. In his Three Essays on
Religion, Mill lays out why there is evil in the world. There are many different situations where evil
acts could be done all with different circumstances and consequences. If you cannot see this email,
please check your spam folder or refer to our order FAQ. Reviews Select overall rating (no rating)
Your rating is required to reflect your happiness. Write a review Update existing review Submit
review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. It is also a diverse problem; evil manifests itself in
many different ways, demanding separate explanations. In taking on the concept of meaning derived
from evil and linking it with the concept of free will, it is difficult to reconcile the contradictions.
Additionally he already knows who will pass and who will fail the exam. But rather that the value of
school is in the sheer joy of learning and of challenging oneself to excel. The other philosophers bring
up some interesting suggestions, but all of them ultimately fail because they do not have the adequate
explanations for the problem of evil. St. Augustine explains that evil and suffering can take place in
the world, even with a loving and powerful God. If someone is suffering today it might be caused by
a “bad action” in that person’s life, or perhaps in a previous life before their reincarnation into this
one. But omnipotence has its logical problems, as does the idea of a 'wholly good' (omnibenevolent)
God. Augustine to argue that God is still all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-loving in the face of evil.
See other similar resources ?5.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you
were looking for. This thought, however, would be argued against by theists as they seek to
understand this duality of purpose that might be present in evil. These three statements cannot all be
true so it would seem that one of them is false, but since we know evil and suffering exist the
inconsistency must lie in one of the other 2 points. By using our site, you agree to our collection of
information through the use of cookies. The trouble has come from the idea that the Absolute is a
moral person. More exactly, I argue that the collection of apparently pointless evil in the world
provides strong evidence for there being truly pointless evil, despite the fact that seeing no justifying
reason for some particular instance of evil is no evidence whatsoever for it truly being pointless. It
could be that some people can never sense their utmost dependence on God except by experiencing
the hard pain they do in their lives. According to Mackie, this is a very limited view of evil. As far as
Augustine is concerned the world was created perfect by God and the fall from perfection has been
created by humans and was contrary to the intention of God. Moreover, Augustine refers to the
Garden of Eden in his theodicy, and this paradise is hard to accept on the basis of evolution. If one
accepts God and declares faith, however, part of that faith is that the believer will not willingly
participate in acts of sin from that point forward.