Shree Ambabai Talim Sanstha’s

SANJAY BHOKARE GROUP OF INSTITUTES, MIRAJ

FACULTY OF POLYTECHNIC
Institute Code: 1552

Department Of ----------------- Engineering

Micro Project Report
On

Project Title
Prepared By

Roll no. Enrolment No. Name

Under the Guidance of

Name Of Faculty

Submitted To

Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education, Mumbai

(Autonomous) (ISO-9001-2008) (ISO/IEC 27001:2013)
Academic Year 2020-2021

1
 MAHARASHTRA STATE
BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
Certificate
(Only for individual micro project report)

This is to certify that Mr. / Ms. ………………………………………………………

Roll No. ……………….…., of ………... Semester of Diploma
in………………….. Engineering , of Institute ATS Sanjay Bhokare Group Of
Institutes, Faculty Of Polytechnic, Miraj. (Code: 1552) has completed the Micro-
Project work satisfactorily in course ………………………………. ( ) for
the academic year 20…….. to 20…….. as prescribed in the curriculum.

Place: …………… Enrollment No:.……………

Date: …………… Exam. Seat No: ……………

Subject Teacher Head of the Department Principal

2
 MAHARASHTRA STATE
BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
Certificate
(Only for Micro Project Group report )

This is to certify that following students,

Roll no. Enrolment No. Exam Seat No. Name

of …….. Semester of Diploma in………………….. Engineering , of Institute

ATS Sanjay Bhokare Group Of Institutes, Faculty Of Polytechnic, Miraj.
(Code: 1552) are completed the Micro Project work satisfactorily in course
………………………………. ( ) for the academic year 20…….. to 20……
as prescribed in the curriculum.

Place: ……………
Date: ……………

Subject Teacher Head of the Department Principal

3
 Annexure – I

PART A – Micro-Project Proposal

Flag Resister
1.0 Brief Introduction
The flag register in a microprocessor is a special-purpose register that stores status
flags indicating the outcome of arithmetic and logic operations. Common flags include Zero
Flag (Z), Carry Flag (C), Sign Flag (S), and Overflow Flag (V), providing essential
information for program control and decision-making. These flags help in conditional
branching and error detection within the processor's operations.
The flag register is a 16-bit register in the Intel 8086 microprocessor that contains information
about the state of the processor after executing an instruction. It is sometimes referred to as
the status register because it contains various status flags that reflect the outcome of the last
operation executed by the processor.

2.0 Aim of the Micro-Project ( in about 1 to 2 Sentences)

This Micro-Project aims at:
1. Performing Actions Based on Flags
2. Define Flag Register

3.0 Intended Course Outcomes

 Analyze the functional block diagram of 8086
 Write assembly language program for the given problem.
 Use instructions for different addressing modes.
 Develop assembly language program using assembler.
 Develop assembly language program procedures, macros and modular programming
approach.
4.0 Literature Review
(Existing status, knowledge about chosen task summarized from books, internet and
other sources in about 200 to 400)

4.0 Proposed Methodology

(Procedure in brief that will be followed to do the micro-project) in about 200 to 500
words)

5.0 Resources Required (major resources like raw material, tools, software etc.)
S. No. Name of Resource/material Specifications Qty Remarks
1
2

6.0 Action Plan (Sequence and time required for major activities for 8 Weeks)

4
 S. No. Details of activity Planned Planned Name of
Start date Finish date Responsible Team
Members
1
2

**************

Annexure – II
Format for Micro-Project Report after Execution in about 8 to 15 pages to be submitted at end of
semester)
PART B – Micro-Project Report

Title of Micro-Project
1.0 Rationale
(Importance of the project, in about 100 to 200 words. This is a modified version of the
proposal after the work)
2.0 Course Outcomes Addressed
(Add to the earlier list if more COs are addressed)
a) .......................................
b) .........................................

3.0 Literature Review

(If additional literature review done, you may add in about 200 to 500 words)

4.0 Actual Methodology Followed

Write step wise the procedure of how the work was done, including which team member did
what work and how the data was analysed (if any).

5.0 Actual Resources Used (Mention the actual resources used).

S. No. Name of Resource/material Specifications Qty Remarks

1
2

6.0 Outputs of the Micro-Project

(Drawings of the prototype, drawings of survey, presentation of collected data, findings etc.)

7.0 Skill Developed / learning out of this Micro-Project

(in about 50 to 100 words)

8.0 Applications of this Micro-Project

5
 (in about 50 to 100 words)
9.0 Area of Future Improvement
(in about 50 to 100 words)
**************

6
 Annexure – III

Teacher Evaluation Sheet

Name of Student: ………………………………………………………… Enrollment No.

……………………………………
Name of Programme………………………………………………… Semester:
………………………………………… Course Title
……………………………………………………………….. Code:
………………………………………………………………

Title of the Micro-Project:

…………………………………………………………………………………………………….

(For Office Use Only)

Course Outcomes Achieved
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………….
Evaluation as per Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro Project
 (Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)
S. Characteristic Poor Average Good Excellent
No to be assessed ( Marks 1-3 ) ( Marks 4 - 5 ) ( Marks 6 - 8 ) ( Marks 9- 10 )
.
1 Relevance to the Relate to very Related to some Take care of at- Take care of more
course few LOs Los least one CO than one CO
 ..
2 Literature Not more than At-least 5 relevant At –least 7 About 10 relevant
Survey two sources sources, at least 2 relevant sources, sources, most
/information (primary and latest most latest latest
collection secondary), very
old reference

3 Completion of Completed less Completed 50 to Completed 60 to Completed more

the Target as than 50% 60% 80% than 80 %
per project
proposal
4 Analysis of Data Sample Size Sufficient and Sufficient and Enough data
and small, data appropriate appropriate collected by
representation neither organized sample, enough sample, enough sufficient and
nor presented data generated but data generated appropriate sample
well not organized and which is organized size. Proper
not presented well. and presented well inferences drawn
No or poor but poor by organising and
inferences drawn inferences drawn presenting data
through tables,

7
S. Characteristic Poor Average Good Excellent
No to be assessed ( Marks 1-3 ) ( Marks 4 - 5 ) ( Marks 6 - 8 ) ( Marks 9- 10 )
.
charts and graphs.

5 Quality of Incomplete Just Well Well

Prototype/Mode fabrication/asse assembled/fabricat assembled/fabricat assembled/fabricat
l mbly. ed and parts are ed with proper ed with proper
not functioning functioning parts. functioning parts.
well. Not in proper In proper shape, In proper shape,
shape, dimensions within tolerance within tolerance
beyond tolerance dimensions and dimensions and
limit. good good
Appearance/finish finish/appearance. finish/appearance.
is shabby. But no creativity Creativity in
in design and use design and use of
of material material

6 Report Very short, poor Nearly sufficient Detailed, correct Very detailed,
Preparation quality sketches, and correct details and clear correct, clear
Details about about methods, description of description of
methods, material, methods, methods,
material, precautions and materials, materials,
precaution and conclusion, but precautions and precautions and
conclusions clarity is not there Conclusions. conclusions.
omitted, some in presentation. Sufficient Graphic Enough tables,
details are wrong But not enough Description. charts and sketches
graphic
description.

7 Presentation Major Includes major Includes major Well organized,

information is information but information and includes major
not included, not well organized well organized but information ,well
information is and not presented not presented well presented
not well well
organized .
8 Any other
(depending upon
nature of project:
please write
indicators by
pen)
Defense Could not reply Replied to Replied properly Replied most of
9 to considerable considerable to considerable the questions
number of number of number of properly
question. questions but not question.
very properly

8
 MIcro-Project Evaluation Sheet

Process Assessment Product Assessment Total

Part A - Project Methodology Part B - Project individual Mark
Project (2 marks) Report/Working Model Presentation/Viva s
Proposal (2 marks) (4 marks) 10
(2 marks)

Note:
Every course teacher is expected to assign marks for group evolution for each group of students in first 3
columns as per rubrics & individual evaluation in 4TH column for each group of students as per rubrics based
on viva.

Comments/Suggestions about team work/leadership/inter-personal communication (if any)

………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………..

Any Other Comment:

……………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………

Name and designation of the Faculty Member…………………………………….

Signature………………………………………………………………………………

Date:………………………..