MATEC Web of Conferences 158, 01029 (2018) https://doi.org/10.

1051/matecconf/201815801029
VI International Forum for Young Scientists “Space Engineering 2018”

Analysis of methods for measuring the liquid

level in the annular space of an oil well
Juriy Shinyakov, Maxim Sukhorukov, Daria Torgaeva, Andrey Soldatov*, Natalia
Shalyapina, and Dmitriy Li
Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, Research Institute of Space
Technology, 634050 Tomsk, Russia

Abstract. One of the most important diagnostic parameters of an oil well

operation is the dynamic liquid level in the annular space. In paper the
main methods for determination of the dynamic liquid level that does not
require suspension of the well work and its depressurization are
considered. Also the comparative analysis of these methods is given.

1 Introduction
Currently, oil production is carried out using sucker rod pumping units (SRPU) and
electrical submersible pumping units (ESPU). Most of Russian’s production well is
equipped with SRP, despite the great amount of disadvantages (bulkiness of the above-
ground part, incomplete wellhead sealing, limited capacity, etc.). It is also worth noting that
SRP is the most suitable unit for oil production in difficult conditions (deep bedding, sand
or paraffin admixture, high gas factor) which is highly topical for using in depleted wells
[1].
The dynamic liquid level in the annular space of the oil well has a huge influence on the
SRP operation. If the operation mode of the pump does not correspond to the rate of flow of
liquid from the reservoir a decrease of dynamic level may be observed, which will lead to
pressure release at the pump intake. In this case, oil degassing will lead to incomplete
filling of the pump and a decrease of pump slippage. A further dynamic level decrease will
lead to pump starvation. If the emergency shutdown does not actuate the operation of the
pump in dry friction mode will lead to wear and damage of the parts [2, 3].
It is recommended to increase the depth of bore-hole pump to a dynamic level in the case of
high gas con-tent in the oil-water mixture. This will lead to a pressure boost on the pump
intake and a large part of the gas in the oil will be in a dissolved state. This fact will
positively affect the production of the SRP. However, due to an increase in the weight of
the rod string and acting floating force the mechanical and hydrodynamic resistance may
increase. As a result, delivery rate and pump efficiency will be more reduced [4, 5].
The fluctuation of the liquid level in the annular space also has a negative effect on the
pump operation because there are load variations at all nodes of the unit, rapid wear and
damage of the SRP components.
There are the following methods for measuring the dynamic liquid level:

*
Corresponding author: [email protected]

© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
MATEC Web of Conferences 158, 01029 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815801029
VI International Forum for Young Scientists “Space Engineering 2018”

• Echometry and wavemetering;

• Thermomanometric system;
• Dynamometry and wattmetry.

2 Echometry and wavemetering

Echometry and wavemetering are one of the most popular methods for determining the
dynamic liquid level of fluid in the annular space of an oil well. They are based on the
calculation of the product of the acoustic velocity in a gaseous medium for the transit time
of the signal from the emission source (wellhead) to the liquid level and back. The
echometry is used for measurements in low-pressure wells, and wavemetering for wells
with high pressure.
However, using this method you can get an equivocal result. Firstly, it is difficult to
recognize the actual position of the liquid level on the echogram because there are noises at
the receiver input. The vibrations of the tubing string, the reflection of the signal from
heterogeneities in the annular space, acoustic noise of the pump also affect the acoustic
signal. For this reason, the useful signal can be indistinguishable from interference.
Secondly, the acoustic wave is reflected not only from the surface of the liquid, but also
from any border line with a significant change in density. It is proved that at a gas-liquid
mixture density of 200 kg / m3 it is sufficient to reliably fix the response. For example, a
foam column is often formed on the surface of a liquid and is a gas-liquid mixture whose
density increases in depth [4]. Thirdly, the acoustic velocity in the annular well space is not
constant, its value depends on the temperature, pressure, density and composition of the gas
and can vary from well to well with same annular pressure even within one deposits.
Despite the disadvantages, the echometry is the main one in the oil industry because it is
fairly simple to implement and inexpensive. A lot of works are devoted to the study of
various techniques and tools that increase the accuracy of liquid level measurements by
echometry [5-12]. For example, in algorithms for estimating the re-cording time of
reflected signals are considered, structural schemes of pulse formers for sounding the
annular space are proposed, which make it possible to obtain a more powerful signal that
can be distinguished against background noise. Works [13, 14] describe methods for
determining the speed of sound in a well: design, pipe, and benchmarking.

3 Thermomanometric systems
This method involves placing pressure and temperature sensors along the wellbore at a
distance of 100 m from each other. Serial interrogation of sensors is performed to determine
the dynamic liquid level. After recording the coordinates of the point "depth, pressure" in
an array corresponding to the region of the well filled with gas, the correlation coefficient
of the points of the entire array is calculated by least square method. The operation is
repeated until the value of the coefficient does not change by more than 10% with respect
to its previous value. This point indicates that the current sensor is immersed in the liquid.
From now on, the "coordinates" are written to another array corresponding to the area of
the well filled with liquid. After conducting a survey on the data recorded in the arrays, 2
graphs of the pressure dependence on the depth of the sensors are constructed. The point of
intersection corresponds to the level of the liquid (Fig. 1).

2
MATEC Web of Conferences 158, 01029 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815801029
VI International Forum for Young Scientists “Space Engineering 2018”

Fig.1. Determination of the liquid level in the well.

The authors of [13, 14] proposed to place pressure sensors along the armored vertical
cable. This method is the perfect approach for ESPU (because the pump is located at the
bottom of the unit, an insulated power cable leads to it). The thermomanometric system
makes it possible to estimate the state of gas and liquid in the annular space in real time,
however, the main disadvantage is the high cost.
A similar method for determining the dynamic level is described in [15]. Temperature
sensors must be located along the entire length of the well at a distance of at least 20-40 m
from each other. After polling all the temperature sensors, a thermogram is formed, along
which the temperature gradient at each point is calculated. The point with the maximum
value of the gradient will be the border line (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Determination of the liquid level in the well according to the temperature gradient.

3
MATEC Web of Conferences 158, 01029 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815801029
VI International Forum for Young Scientists “Space Engineering 2018”

4 Dynamometry and wattmetry

There are methods to determine the dynamic liquid level by dynamometer cards (the
dependence between load on the polished rod and its stroke) and wattmeter cards (the
dependence between power consumed by the motor and time).
Based on dynamometer card, it is possible to determine not only the load on the
polished rod, but also the production rate of the well, and the condition of the pumping unit
as a whole. The dynamometer card is the result of the interaction of a huge number of
factors, so its interpretation is a very difficult task. Based on the deviation of a real
dynamometer card from an ideal mathematical model, any deviations from the norm are
fixed.
The article proposes a technique for calculating the change in the dynamic liquid level
by an ideal dynamometer card. Initial data are the parameters of the pump itself, as well as
the depth of its immersion and the value of the pressure in the pipe. This estimation method
is indirect and requires large computing powers. However, the dynamic level change is
usually monitored to prevent pump failure. The ingress of gas into the pump cylinder
causes significant changes in the shape of the dynamometer card. In particular, when the
pressure on the pump intake valve decreases, a dynamometer card of the form shown in
Fig. 3a goes to the form Fig. 3b. This is caused by large gas content in the oil or a decrease
in the dynamic level before the pump is received.

Fig. 3. Practical dynamometer cards of the SRP operation: a) normal operation with a small number
of oscillations, b) gas effect.
Dynamometer cards and wattmeter cards are connected by complex non-linear
dependencies. Determining the dynamic liquid level and other parameters of the pump by
using wattmeter cards is an urgent task. These data allow to control the operation of the
pumping unit according to the indications of a single sensor (almost all SRP are equipped
with power sensors). However, a significant disadvantage of this method is the complex
process of interpretation the wattmeter cards.

5 Conclusion
As a result, he most promising method from the considered is the method of determining
the dynamic liquid level on wattmeter cards because it does not require the installation of
additional equipment and allows to determine the state of the entire pumping unit by one
single parameter.

The work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation,
Agreement No. 14.574.21.0157 (unique identifier RFMEFI57417X0157), within the framework of
the FTP project "Research and Development in Priority Directions for the Development of the
Russian Science and Technology Complex for 2014-2020".

4
MATEC Web of Conferences 158, 01029 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815801029
VI International Forum for Young Scientists “Space Engineering 2018”

References
1. F. Terraneo, L. Rinaldi, M. Maggio, A. Papadopoulos, A. Leva, P.R.T. Sys. Symp.
7010370, 11 (2015)
2. S. K. Phang, J. J. Ong, R. T. C. Yeo, B. M. Chen, T. H. Lee, SIBIRCON, 722 (2010)
3. V. D. Yurkevich, SIBIRCON, 124 (2015)
4. A. I. Soldatov, A. A. Soldatov, S. I. Bortalevich, O. A. Kozhemyak, P. V. Sorokin, E.
L. Loginov, Y. A. Shinyakov, M. P. Sukhorukov, SIBCON, (2017)
5. Y. V. Shulgina, A. L. Starostin, M. A. Kostina, T. S. Mylnikova, A. I. Soldatov,
MEACS, (2015)
6. A. I. Soldatov, O. A. Kozhemyak, A. A. Soldatov, Yu. V.Shulgina, IOP Conf. S: Mat.
S&E, (2015)
7. Y. V. Shulgina, A. A. Soldatov, E. M. Shulgin, A. V. Kudryashova, SIBCON, (2015)
8. Yu. V. Shulgina, A. I. Soldatov, Ya. V. Rozanova, A. A. Soldatov, E. M. Shulgin, IOP
Conf. S: Mat. S&E, (2015)
9. Y. V. Shulgina, A. I. Soldatov, E. M. Shulgin, Y. V. Rozanova, M. Kroning, MEACS,
(2014)
10. A. I. Soldatov, A. I. Seleznev, A. A. Soldatov, P. V. Sorokin, V. S. Makarov, Rus. J.
NDT 48(5), 268 (2012)
11. A. I. Soldatov, A. I. Seleznev, A. A. Soldatov, I. I. Fiks, X. M. Kroening, Rus. J. NDT,
48(4) 255 (2012)
12. A. I. Soldatov, J. V. Chiglintseva, SIBCON, (2009)
13. H. Bodur, A. F. Bakan, M. A. Baysal, E. E. 85 (1), 45 (2003)
14. M., Borage, S. Tiwari, S. Kotaiah, IEEE T. on I. Electr. 52 (6), 1547 (2005)
15. Y. A. Shinyakov, V. D. Semenov, V. A. Kabirov, D. S. Torgaeva, M. P. SuKhorukov
and R. S. Cevastyanov, SIBIRCON, 346 (2017)