Position Paper -

bullying and
cyber-bullying
July 2011

headspace position papers are for general information only. They are not intended to be and should not be relied
on as a substitute for specific medical or health advice. They are not intended to be and should not be relied on as
clinical guidelines. While every effort is taken to ensure the information is accurate, headspace makes no
representations and gives no warranties that this information is correct, current, complete, reliable or suitable for
any purpose. We disclaim all responsibility and liability for any direct or indirect loss, damage, cost or expense
whatsoever in the use of or reliance upon this information.

headspace National Youth Mental Health Foundation Ltd is funded by the Australian Government
Bullying and cyber-bullying
the issue
Bullying is intentional and repeated intimidating behavior by an individual or group against another person or group, in
the context of ongoing social relationships. Bullying can have a major impact on mental health and wellbeing and is
significantly associated with the development of mental health problems.
Bullying takes many forms and can occur in a ‘real’ or virtual environment. Bullying that occurs face-to-face can be
verbal, physical, relational/social, and indirect (involving a third party) [1]. Cyber-bullying involves intimidating
behavior or degradation via technological resources such as mobile phone text messages, email, chat
rooms/discussion groups, and online social networking sites. Methods of bullying tend to overlap, so that young
people who are cyber-bullied also tend to be bullied face-to-face [2].

evidence
The prevalence of bullying is not well established, and differing definitions and study methods make the comparison of
studies a particular challenge. Australian data reveal that 1 in 8 young people have experienced verbal bullying
(teasing or nasty things being said) over the past school term [3] and half of year 8 students reported being victimized
in a large-scale Victorian survey [4]. Around 10 per cent of Australian students (Years 4 to 8) have reported that they
have been cyber-bullied [5].
Bullying is a major concern of young people. In 2010, it was ranked the third highest issue of concern for 11- to 14-
year-old. Over a quarter of this age group indicated it was a major concern, compared with 20 per cent of 15–19-year-
olds and 16 per cent of 20–24-year-olds [6].
The consequences of victimization are many and can be very serious and some young people are more at risk of
being bullied than others [7]. Being a victim of bullying in childhood is associated with poorer mental health outcomes,
such as depression and anxiety, poorer functioning in social and occupational roles and greater likelihood of
repeatedly thinking about suicide in adulthood [8, 9]. Importantly, bullying is associated with increased suicide risk
[10]. A meta-analysis of 18 longitudinal studies of approximately 14,000 participants revealed a two-way relationship
between internalizing problems, such as depression and anxiety, and being bullied; that is, that children who have
internalizing problems are more likely to be bullied and children who are bullied are more likely to report internalizing
problems [11]. The experience of severe bullying in childhood has been shown to have an association with psychotic
symptoms in early adolescence [12].
Primary school aged children who are being bullied, or who are both a bully and a victim of bullying, are more likely to
have physical health symptoms such as repeated sore throats, colds and coughs, and greater psychosomatic health
problems, such as headaches, stomach aches, not sleeping well [13], poor appetite, and worrying about attending
school, compared to those who have not been bullied. ‘Pure’ bullies who have never been victimized reported the
least health problems [14].
An individual may at different times be a perpetrator, victim or witness to a bullying event. Witnessing bullying, as
either a passive watcher or actively supporting/reinforcing the victim or perpetrator, may itself have some detrimental
effects on mental well-being [15].
A systematic review of school-based programs from over 25 years of research from around the world [16] found that:
• Overall, school-based programs can be effective in reducing bullying and being bullied (on average bullying
decreased by 20-23 per cent and victimization by 17-20 per cent).
• The most important program elements that were associated with a decrease in bullying were: parent
training/meetings, improved playground supervision, disciplinary methods, classroom management, teacher
training, classroom rules, whole-school anti-bullying policy, school conferences, information for parents, and
cooperative group work amongst schoolteachers/staff. Important components of reducing victimization were
disciplinary methods, parent training/meetings, videos and cooperative group work amongst schoolteachers/staff.

Page 2 Position Paper - bullying and cyberbullying

• Engagement of peers in tackling bullying had no positive effect on reducing bullying behavior and was associated
with an increase in victimization. Direct individual work with bullies or victims within schools was not found to have
significant effect.
• Programs of a greater duration and made up of a greater number of components were the most effective in
reducing both bullying and victimization.
Warm and positive family relationships, including both parental and sibling relationships, can help to buffer
children from the negative consequences of being bullied [17], with children who are bullied or who are bullies
with high parental support reporting fewer symptoms of depression [18].

position statements
• Bullying is not simply ‘part of growing up’. It is a destructive issue that can have serious effects on a young person’s
physical and mental health.
• Cyber-bullying can be even more debilitating than direct bullying, with victims feeling like there is no escape.
• Young people who have been bullied or victimized by their peers should be screened for mental health problems
and suicidality.
• Parents and carers can assist their child by looking out for the signs of victimization (such as cuts and bruises,
becoming withdrawn, having nightmares, losing or having damaged possessions, not wanting to go to school), by
developing their skills to respond to bullying behavior, and by helping them build resilience and broader social skills.
• School-based bullying prevention programs can be effective.
• Bullying is part of a wider social issue, and a coordinated effort that engages both schools and the wider community
to say ‘no’ to bullying and peer victimization is needed.

headspace recommends
• All schools have a clearly stated bullying policy that provides a comprehensive and preventative approach to school
bullying and violence, including improving the capacity of schools to deal with the underlying causes of bullying
behavior.
• Parents and carers are aware of the bullying policy at their child’s school, as well as the signs of victimization and
the ways they can help (see [19]).
• Further evaluation and research into the effectiveness of school anti-bullying policies and programs to develop a
stronger, best practice approach.
• Prioritizing educating children and young people regarding safe online behavior (see [20]).
• The creation of stronger relationships between schools, workplaces, and mental health services (including
headspace centers, local primary care centers and area mental health services) to ensure both victims and
perpetrators are identified and supported.
• Development of a systematic approach to bullying within the workplace, where more research is needed to identify
the rates and effects of bullying in workplaces and to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions. Workplaces need
to take a more active role in addressing the issue of bullying, including the development of bullying policies, staff
training and providing staff with access to services for support and advice when needed.
headspace will
work to highlight the importance of addressing bullying in schools, workplaces and the community, and ensure that
young people who have been bullied are provided with appropriate support and services.

Page 3 Position Paper - bullying and cyberbullying

references
1. Hawker, D.S.J., & Boulton, M.J., Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychosocial
maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry, 2000. 41(4): p. 441-455.
2. Perren, S., Dooley, J., Shaw, T., & Cross, D., Bullying in school and cyberspace: Associations with
depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental
Health, 2010. 4(28).
3. Forero, R., McLellan, L., Rissell, C., & Bauman, A., Bullying behaviour and psychosocial health among school
students in New South Wales, Australia: cross-sectional survey. British Medical Journal, 1999. 319: p. 344-
348.
4. Bond, L., Carlin, J.B.,Thomas, L., Rubin, K., & Patton, G., Does bullying cause emotional problems? A
prospective study of young teenagers. British Medical Journal, 2001. 323: p. 480-484.
5. Cross, D., Shaw, T., Hearn, L., Epstein, M., Monks, H., Lester, L., & Thomas, L., Australian Covert Bullying
Prevalence Study (ACBPS). 2009, Child Health Promotion Research Centre, Edith Cowan University: Perth.
6. Mission Australia, National survey of young australians 2010: Key and emerging issues. 2010, Mission
Australia.
7. Arseneault, L., Bowes, L., & Shakoor, S., Bullying victimization in youths and mental health problems: 'much
ado about nothing?'. Psychological Medicine, 2010. 40: p. 717-729.
8. Allison, S., Roeger, L., & Reinfeld-Kirkman, N., Does school bullying affect adult health? Population survey of
health-related quality of life and past victimisation. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 2009.
43(1163-1170).
9. Roeger, L., Allison, S., Korossy-Horwood, R., Eckert, K.A., & Goldney, R.D. , Is a history of school bullying
victimization associated with adult suicidal ideation?: a South Australian population-based observational
study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 2010. 198: p. 728-733.
10. Brunstein Klomek, A.B., Sourander, A., & Gould, M., The association of suicide and bullying in childhood to
young adulthood: A review of cross-sectional and longitudinal research findings. Canadian Journal of
Psychiatry, 2010. 55(5): p. 282-288.
11. Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J.H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M.J., Peer victimization and internalizing problems in
children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse and Neglect, 2010. 34: p. 244-252.
12. Schreier, A., Wolke, D., Thomas, K., Horwood, J., Hollis, C., Gunnell, D., Lewis, G., Thompson, A., Zammit,
S., Duffy, L., Salvi, G., & Harrison, G., Prospective study of peer victimization in childhood and psychotic
symptoms in a nonclinical population at age 12 years. Archives of General Psychiatry, 2009. 66(5): p. 527-
536.
13. Williams, K., Chambers, M., Logan, S., & Robinson, D., Association of common health symptoms with
bullying in primary school children. British Medical Journal, 1996. 313: p. 17-19.
14. Wolke, D., Woods, S.,Bloomfield, L., & Karstadt, L., Bullying involvement in primary school and common
health problems. . Archives of Disorders in Childhood, 2001. 85: p. 197-201.
15. Rivers, I., Poteat, P.V., et al, Observing bullying at school: The mental health implication of witness status.
American Psychologist, 2009. 24(4): p. 211-233.
16. Farrington, D., & Ttoti, M., School based programs to reduce bullying and victimization, in The Campbell
Collaboration. 2009.
17. Bowes, L., Maughan, B., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T.E., & Arseneault, L., Families promote emotional and
behavioural resilience to bullying: Evidence of an environmental effect. Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry, 2010. 51(7): p. 809-817.
18. Connors-Burrow, N.A., Johnson, D.L., Whiteside-Mansell, L., McKelvey, L., & Gargus, R.A., Adults matter:
Protecting children from the negative impacts of bullying. Psychology in the Schools, 2009. 46(7): p. 593-604.
19. Australian Psychological Society. Parent guide to helping children manage conflict, aggression and bullying.
2007 [cited 2011 19 April]; Available from:
http://www.psychology.org.au/publications/tip_sheets/bullying#s9.
20. S-press & headspace. 2010; Available from: http://www.headspace.org.au/media/41573/ed%2011.pdf.

Page 4 Position Paper - bullying and cyberbullying

Process question:

1. what is the issue taken up in the position paper?

 Bullying is a problem that can have a considerable influence on mental health and wellbeing, as well
as being linked to the development of mental health problems. Bullying can take many forms,
including verbal, physical, relational/social, and indirect bullying.

2. what is the writer’s claim or thesis on the issue?

3. what reason or given to support this claim?

 Writer says that Bullying is a harmful issue that can negatively impact a young person's physical and
mental health. Also, cyberbullying can be even more devastating than direct bullying. And to those young
people who have been bullied should have their mental health and suicidality checked.

4. what kind or support are given for the reasons?


5. what counterarguments are presented? How are these refuted?

6. do you find the position paper convincing? Justify your answer.

Page 5 Position Paper - bullying and cyberbullying