Are you struggling with writing a literature review for your academic paper? You're not alone.

Crafting a literature review can be an arduous task, requiring meticulous research, analysis, and
synthesis of existing literature on your topic. It demands time, effort, and expertise to ensure that
your review is comprehensive, cohesive, and contributes meaningfully to your research.

Navigating through numerous academic sources, critically evaluating their content, and organizing
your findings into a coherent narrative can be overwhelming, especially if you're juggling other
academic or professional commitments. Many students and researchers find themselves stuck in the
daunting process of literature review writing, unsure of where to begin or how to proceed effectively.

But fear not, there's a solution at hand. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers professional assistance tailored to
your specific needs. Our team of experienced writers specializes in crafting high-quality literature
reviews that meet the rigorous standards of academic writing. Whether you need guidance in
selecting relevant sources, structuring your review, or synthesizing complex ideas, our experts are
here to help.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time, alleviate stress, and
ensure that your paper meets the expectations of your instructors or peers. Our writers are proficient
in various academic disciplines and are well-versed in the nuances of literature review writing. They
will work closely with you to understand your research objectives and deliver a review that reflects
your unique perspective and insights.

Don't let the challenges of literature review writing impede your academic progress. Order your
literature review from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and experience the difference that professional
assistance can make. With our expertise and support, you can confidently embark on your research
journey, knowing that your literature review is in capable hands.
After presenting the key themes, the authors recommend that practitioners need to approach
healthcare communication in a more structured way, such as by ensuring there is a clear
understanding of who is in charge of ensuring effective communication in clinical settings. Literature
reviews are the foundation of research on a given topic. After presenting the key themes, the authors
recommend that practitioners need to approach healthcare communication in a more structured way,
such as by ensuring there is a clear understanding of who is in charge of ensuring effective
communication in clinical settings. As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make other
scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on
a topic. Systematic Literature Review Of Templates For Reporting Literature review template the
following is a simple pattern to follow for writing up your systematic literature review. This article
aims to guide you on the different kinds of systematic review, the standard procedures to be
followed, and the best approach to conducting and writing a systematic review. Qualitative versus
quantitative research Empirical versus theoretical scholarship Divide the research by sociological,
historical, or cultural sources Theoretical: In many humanities articles, the literature review is the
foundation for the theoretical framework. Journal of experimental criminology, 10, 487-513. Grey
literature includes unpublished studies, reports, dissertations, how to write a systematic review paper,
conference papers and abstracts, governmental research, and ongoing clinical trials.
Methodologically As made obvious by the terminology, this type of structuring focuses on the
methods used to present the central concept. This will give you a chance to take your mind off it and
then get back to proofreading with a fresh perspective. It can be undertaken as stand-alone projects
in their own right, or as a precursor to a systematic review. Your interpretation of the available
sources must be backed up with evidence to show that what you are saying is valid. Today, young
researchers wish to start publishing articles early on in their career. If the same authors, books or
articles keep appearing in your reading, make sure to seek them out. F uture research teams might
want to replicate your review in order to follow up on your findings. Most journals expect authors of
systematic reviews to use the PRISMA statement or similar other guidelines to write their protocol.
Source: Younas and Maddigan. 4 Tip 4: compose potential themes from each article during summary
writing While developing literature summary tables, many authors use themes or subthemes reported
in the given articles as the key results of their own review. Holding degrees in more than 50 subjects,
they know how to create masterpieces. Here are the top 3 tips you need to keep in mind when
writing a literature review: 1. Systematic reviews are absolutely crucial in the field of evidence-based
medicine, but are also highly valued in other fields. This means the writing should be structured
chronologically, thematically or methodologically. For example, linkages to or disagreements with
other theories, questions raised but unanswered, shortcomings or limitations, and so forth. More and
more cultural studies scholars are accepting popular media as a subject worthy of academic
consideration. Subject 1: A brief overview of the particular piece of literature in general terms; an
analysis of the key aspects of the study; a review of the research questions, methods, procedures, and
outcomes; and an overview of the strong and weak points, gaps, and contradictions. Consider how
each source approaches your topic in addition to their collective points of intersection and separation.
Well, there are (at least) four core functions: For you to gain an understanding (and demonstrate this
understanding) of where the research is at currently, what the key arguments and disagreements are.
Systematic Review Examples This type of literature review is more structured and rigorous than a
narrative review. After the introduction, it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads
directly to your theoretical framework or methodology. Create a data extraction form and set your
reviewers to work extracting data from the qualified studies.
For instance, the review might examine whaling from pre-1600-1699, 1700-1799, and 1800-1899.
Once that’s decided, you need to draw up an outline of your entire chapter in bullet point format.
And don’t forget to tap into your professor’s (or other professors’) knowledge in the field. For
instance, first you would talk about the British biological studies of the 18th century, then about
Moby Dick, published in 1851, then the book on sperm whales in other art (1968), and finally the
biology articles (1980s) and the recent articles on American whaling of the 19th century. We use
cookies to create the best experience for you. This is not a comprehensive list of resources on the
handout’s topic, and we encourage you to do your own research to find additional publications.
Coffman et al (2009) explain that after identifying the research questions to be responded to and
categorically stating the purpose of the systematic review, then the practitioner should determine
how and where to conduct the review. Also, without the bird’s eye view that a catalogue provides,
you’ll miss connections between various articles, and have no view of how the research developed
over time. Instead, we suggest looking at what you've collected once more, evaluating the available
sources, and selecting the most relevant ones. Formal Literature Review Template tru.ca Details File
Format PDF Size: 113 KB Download If you do not know anything about literature review writing,
then you should download this PDF. Literature Review Matrix Template (Word) Literature Review
Matrix Template (Excel) Related Resources Didn't find what you need. You can do this by assessing
the citation count of any given article in Google Scholar. However, it’s critically important to decide
on your structure and develop a detailed outline before you write anything. Due to this variety of
formats, make sure you are clear on what kind of literature review your professor is expecting. Find
Models Use the exercise of reviewing the literature to examine how authors in your discipline or
area of interest have composed their literature review sections. University of Toronto; Writing a
Literature Review. An entire section of your report should be dedicated to explaining the methods
used to complete the review. For effective data extraction and rigorous synthesis in reviews, the use
of literature summary tables is of utmost importance. Previous Page: Commentary Versus Opinion
Next Page: Professional Development Plans (PDPs) Office of Student Disability Services Walden
Resources Departments. Embedded literature reviews are usually placed near the beginning of your
essay in order to provide your reader with important context as well as to situate your work within
the wider body of research on your topic. The introduction should clearly establish the focus and
purpose of the literature review. Source: Overview: This narrative review analyzed themes emerging
from 69 articles about communication in healthcare contexts. This means that you will not just simply
list your sources and go into detail about each one of them, one at a time. No. As you read widely
but selectively in your topic area, consider instead what themes or issues connect your sources
together. Like any other academic text, your literature review should have an introduction, a main
body, and a conclusion. They will help you understand what the final product of a literature review
should ideally look like. A classic systematic literature review can take different approaches:
Effectiveness reviews assess the extent to which a medical intervention or therapy achieves its
intended effect. But how is a literature review different from an academic research paper. It is still a
good idea to compare methodologies as a background to the evaluation. For example, you might
summarize a source in a paper, in a literature review, or as a standalone assignment. Finally, double
check that you’ve documented your sources and formatted the review appropriately for your
discipline.
This is, after all, one of the main purposes of the literature review process (i.e. to familiarise yourself
with the current state of research in your field). References: The References section of a systematic
review article usually contains an extensive number of references. My proposal was accepted late last
year but I honestly did not know where to start Like the name of your YouTube implies you are
GRAD (great,resource person, about dissertation). For example, imagine the authors of an article,
included in a review, used phenomenological inquiry for their research. It should be adapted to your
specific question. 8. Analyze the results Establish a standard measure of outcome which can be
applied to each study on the basis of its effect size. Some important questions to ask yourself are:
What answers does the existing research provide to my own research questions. Literature reviews
provide an important bridge between the expert scientific community and many other communities,
such as science journalists, teachers, and medical and allied health professionals. Because most
historical writing uses the Chicago Manual of Style as a reference system, most historiographies will
also require you to use the Chicago Manual of Style. Shape the main research question: What is the
potential role of arthropods (mechanical or biological vectors) in the distribution of the Ebola virus.
In a scientific article, there are some easy questions you can ask to identify the key points in each
part. The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review. The
purpose of having a protocol is to promote transparency of methods. Finally, tighten it up and send it
off to your supervisor for comment. A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific
topic. However, the authors also note several limitations of the study: most importantly, that apple
eaters are likely to differ from non-apple eaters in ways that may have confounded the results (for
example, apple eaters may be more likely to be health-conscious). A literature review is structured
differently from an original research article. Therefore, the process of systematic review should
begin by asking what question or questions does it seek to answer and the specific concepts that are
involved in answering these questions. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic
Techniques. Coffman et al (2009) explain that after identifying the research questions to be
responded to and categorically stating the purpose of the systematic review, then the practitioner
should determine how and where to conduct the review. Prognostic reviews examine the course of a
disease and its potential outcomes. You can argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach
or combine various theorical concepts to create a framework for your research. It is practiced in
almost all fields including arts, computer science, science, history, and social science etc. Now it’s
time go through each section and pick out its most important points. Sample Literature Reviews as
part of a articles or Theses Sample Literature Review on Critical Thinking (Gwendolyn Reece,
American University Library) Hackett, G and Melia, D. Instead of using this theme as one of the
review findings, the reviewers should read and interpret beyond the given description in an article,
compare and contrast themes, findings from one article with findings and themes from another
article to find similarities and differences and to understand and explain bigger picture for their
readers. Instead, it focuses on existing studies relevant to the main topic. ? Here is a literature
review outline example on the subject of the Ebola virus to help you get it right: Introduce the
general topic. The PRISMA Statement is a document that consists of a item checklist and a flow
diagram and aims to guide authors on how to develop a systematic review protocol and what to
include when writing the review. Excellent information, Clear explanation, and Easy to follow, Many
thanks Derek. Excluding it completely from a literature review is inappropriate because the search
should be always as complete as possible in order to reduce the risk of publication bias. Try for free
You should read the article more than once to make sure you’ve thoroughly understood it.
You can also review the indexes of books to find references to specific issues that can serve as the
focus of your research. Assess the quality of the studies Your reviewers should evaluate the
methodological quality of your chosen full-text articles. In your notes, be sure to record each
author’s thesis, methodology, strengths, limitations, and significant findings in addition to relevant
information you can use in an essay. An article summary like the above would be appropriate for a
stand-alone summary assignment. Thinking interdisciplinarily about a research problem can be a
rewarding exercise in applying new ideas, theories, or concepts to an old problem. For example, US-
based, respondents aged 25-35, lower- income, etc. A ready-made example of literature review helps
to know how to get started properly without straggling with irrelevant information and searching
through tons of unnecessary materials. For example, what might cultural anthropologists say about
the continuing conflict in the Middle East. A summary is always much shorter than the original text.
You can use our free APA Reference Generator for quick, correct, consistent citations. For example,
for a review about the effectiveness of healthcare interventions, a literature summary table must
include information about the intervention, its type, content timing, duration, setting, effectiveness,
negative consequences, and receivers and implementers’ experiences of its usage. The review authors
must include this information in their summary table. Fourth, analyze the patterns you noted by
considering similarities and differences between sources. You can argue for the relevance of a
specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts to create a framework for your
research. Three common approaches are chronological, thematic, and debate-focused. The available
protocol registries for systematic reviews are. Try writing a simple statement that lets the reader
know what is your main organizing principle. Really helpful, Thank you for the effort in showing
such information This is super helpful thank you very much. Campbell offers editorial and
methodological support to review authors throughout the process of producing a systematic review.
Results: The Results section should also be explained logically. Summarizing, or writing a summary,
means giving a concise overview of a text’s main points in your own words. In other words, to
reduce bias, the rationale, the hypothesis, and the methods of data collection are prepared before the
review and are used as a guide for performing the process. Thank you so much for your guide of
video and other instructions for the dissertation writing. As such, the thesis or central argument of
your historiography should explain why your research on the topic contributes to or rejects previous
historical analyses of your topic. Tip 1: provide detailed information about frameworks and methods
Download figure Open in new tab Download powerpoint Tabular literature summaries from a
scoping review. A good strategy is to begin by searching the USC Libraries Catalog for recent books
about the topic and review the table of contents for chapters that focuses on specific issues. If the
literature review is part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate how your research addresses gaps and
contributes new knowledge, or discuss how you have drawn on existing theories and methods to
build a framework for your research. Writing Your Literature Review Once you've settled on how to
organize your literature review, you're ready to write each section. The places to consider in your
search are electronic scientific databases (the most popular are PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase ),
controlled clinical trial registers, non-English literature, raw data from published trials, references
listed in primary sources, and unpublished sources known to experts in the field. ?? Take a look at
our list of the top academic research databases. Today, young researchers wish to start publishing
articles early on in their career.
In this case, devote most of your space to explaining the connections between sources, but you must
also include a thesis and a conclusion, even though they will be brief. Literature reviews are the
foundation of research on a given topic. You should be able to answer it based only on a review of
existing publications. In the preceding example, Falk and Mills either directly refer in the text to the
author of their source, such as Hamilton, or they provide ample notation in the text when the ideas
they are mentioning are not their own, for example, Gastil’s. Systematic literature reviews can be
utilized in various contexts, but they’re often relied on in clinical or healthcare settings. Usually, it’s
unnecessary, but if an abstract is mentioned in the requirements, consider adding it to the working
plan. Tip 5: create your personalised template for literature summaries Often templates are available
for data extraction and development of literature summary tables. Importance of a Good Literature
Review A literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social
sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and
synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories. A good strategy is to begin by searching the
USC Libraries Catalog for recent books about the topic and review the table of contents for chapters
that focuses on specific issues. This is where your librarian will come in handy again. Don’t be afraid
to do more research if you discover a new thread as you’re writing. A literature review in this sense
is just like any other academic research paper. Systematic literature reviews are often found in clinical
or healthcare settings. They can even be used as the starting point for developing clinical practice
guidelines. The goal is to gather the maximum amount of valid literature on the topic, filter out
invalid or low-quality reviews, and minimize bias. For example, for a review about the effectiveness
of healthcare interventions, a literature summary table must include information about the
intervention, its type, content timing, duration, setting, effectiveness, negative consequences, and
receivers and implementers’ experiences of its usage. The essence of a systematic review lies in being
systematic. It gives a general summary of information relevant to a certain research problem or
question. The format will depend on the journal of publication as each journal has their own specific
referencing format. Our sample literature review documents contain examples, guidelines, and
sample brief information about literature review writing and research paper. Give a thorough
overview of each theme, integrating source data, and conclude with a summary of the current state
of knowledge then suggestions for future research based upon your evaluation of what is lacking in
the literature. Plenty of information mentioned years ago remains relevant, so it’s better not to miss
it. Read the article carefully, highlighting important points and taking notes as you read. Here are a
couple of examples: The current trend in treatment for congestive heart failure combines surgery and
medicine. Prognostic reviews examine the course of a disease and its potential outcomes. Third,
there are the perceptions, conclusions, opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally among
scholars that become part of the body of epistemological traditions within the field. Then you look
up a book written in 1968 with information on how sperm whales have been portrayed in other forms
of art, such as in Alaskan poetry, in French painting, or on whale bone, as the whale hunters in the
late 19th century used to do. If you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and
summarizing sources in order. Sitemap case study creative writing presentation problem solving
rewiew prompts websites tips. Here are several strategies you can utilize to assess whether you've
thoroughly reviewed the literature: Look for repeating patterns in the research findings.
Your systematic review should include the following details: the objectives of your project the
specific methods and processes that you’ll use the eligibility criteria of the individual studies how
you plan to extract data from individual studies which analyses you’re going to carry out. History:
The chronological progression of the field, the literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand
the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology. This is achieved
by simplifying or omitting stages of the systematic review process. A literature review is structured
differently from an original research article. Now what is the most effective way of presenting the
information. As you read and evaluate your literature there are several different ways to organize
your research. A literature review, like a term paper, is usually organized around ideas, not the
sources themselves as an annotated bibliography would be organized. The carefully examined
examples can be like a treasure with multiple tips. This type of writing requires you to read and
analyze various sources that relate to the main subject and present each unique comprehension of the
publications. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic Techniques. Use quotes
sparingly Falk and Mills do not use any direct quotes. Good Sources When working on a literature
review, the most important thing any writer should remember is to find the best possible sources for
their MOP. The format will depend on the journal of publication as each journal has their own
specific referencing format. Embedded historiographies are shorter and may only need to be two or
three paragraphs. Some databases to search for journals and articles include: Your university’s library
catalogue Google Scholar Project Muse (humanities and social sciences) Medline (life sciences and
biomedicine) EconLit (economics) Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science) You can use
boolean operators to help narrow down your search: Read the abstract to find out whether an article
is relevant to your question. Systematic Review This form consists of an overview of existing
evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and
standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and
analyze data from the studies that are included in the review. Often, the literature review is where
you can establish your research as filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way.
Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387-408. Emphasize the major contradictions and
points of disagreement. If the literature review is part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate how
your research addresses gaps and contributes new knowledge, or discuss how you have drawn on
existing theories and methods to build a framework for your research. They should be able to help
you formulate a detailed search strategy, and point you to all of the best databases for your topic. ??
Read more on on how to efficiently search research databases. Try for free You should read the
article more than once to make sure you’ve thoroughly understood it. The process begins with
formulation of the problem that is aimed at describing, synthesizing, and summarizing published
findings regarding a particular problem or phenomenon in practice, and presents these findings in
ways that answer specific research questions and saves other nursing practitioners the time for
obtaining and evaluating the findings themselves (Whittemore and Knafl, 2008). Share to Twitter
Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest. Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography
can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you
research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars,
professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic. If the article takes a different form, you
might have to think more carefully about what points are most important for the reader to understand
its argument. Appendix In your review's appendix, include your entire search strategy. Some
questions to ask: How are they organizing their ideas. This approach helps highlight ethical issues
which you should be aware of and consider as you go through your own study. Helps to find out the
key themes, principles, concepts, and researchers that exist within a topic.