Title: Enhance Your Literature Review Capacity with Expert Assistance

Welcome to our platform, where we understand the intricacies and challenges of crafting a
comprehensive literature review. Undertaking a literature review is a crucial aspect of academic and
research endeavors, but it's often a daunting task for many. The process demands meticulous
attention to detail, extensive research, critical analysis, and effective synthesis of existing literature.

Writing a literature review requires more than just summarizing previous studies; it involves
identifying gaps, evaluating methodologies, analyzing findings, and providing insights that
contribute to the existing body of knowledge. It's a task that demands time, dedication, and a deep
understanding of the subject matter.

Navigating through numerous scholarly articles, books, and other sources can be overwhelming,
especially when trying to establish a coherent narrative that aligns with your research objectives.
Furthermore, ensuring that your literature review adheres to academic standards and effectively
supports your research can add to the challenge.

Here at ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we recognize the complexities involved in crafting a literature review

By availing our services, you can:

1. Save Time and Effort: Let our skilled writers handle the time-consuming task of literature
review writing, allowing you to focus on other aspects of your research.
2. Ensure Quality and Originality: We guarantee well-researched, meticulously crafted literature
reviews that are original and adhere to academic integrity standards.
3. Gain Valuable Insights: Benefit from the expertise of our writers who possess in-depth
knowledge of diverse subject areas, providing valuable insights and perspectives for your
literature review.
4. Meet Deadlines with Confidence: Our efficient workflow ensures timely delivery of your
literature review, enabling you to meet your academic or research deadlines without stress.
5. Enhance Your Academic and Research Endeavors: A well-written literature review can
significantly enhance the credibility and impact of your academic work. With our assistance,
you can elevate the quality and effectiveness of your research output.

Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review hinder your academic or research progress.
Trust ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ to provide the expert assistance you need to strengthen your literature
review capacity and achieve your goals. Get in touch with us today to learn more about our services
and how we can support your academic and research endeavors.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds
to upgrade your browser. Some questions to ask: How are they organizing their ideas. The main
procedures of a systematic review involve: Formulating a review question and developing a search
strategy based on explicit inclusion criteria for the identification of eligible studies (usually described
in the context of a detailed review protocol). In other words, you do not want to delve into idle
speculation. The literature review gives you a chance to: Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic
and its scholarly context Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists Show how your research addresses a
gap or contributes to a debate Evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your
knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic. Lit reviews can take many different
organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to accomplish with the review.
Comprehensive knowledge of the literature of the field is essential to most research papers. The
literature represents background and research developments related to a specific research question,
interpreted and analyzed by you in a synthesized way. Something to be conducted at the end of your
research. Rely heavily on the guidelines your instructor has given you. There is an increasing interest
in the visual aspects of social media. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in
the process. Conclusion: Summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and
emphasize their significance Connect it back to your primary research question How should I
organize my lit review. Psychologically speaking, stress is defined as a reaction to a stimulus that can
affect both the physical and mental equilibrium. As in most narrative reviews, the scope of the
research questions being investigated is broad: (a) how development of these systems are carried out;
(b) which methods are used to investigate these systems; and (c) what conclusions can be drawn as a
result of the development of these systems. To provide clear answers to these questions, a literature
search was conducted on six electronic databases and Google Scholar. Or it might trace the
intellectual progression of the field, including major debates. In the present context, the notion of
rigour refers to the reliability and validity of the review process described in section 9.2. For one
thing, reliability is related to the reproducibility of the review process and steps, which is facilitated
by a comprehensive documentation of the literature search process, extraction, coding and analysis
performed in the review. The following sections present these components in a suggested template
for you to follow in the preparation of your research proposal. In a research proposal, this can take
two forms: a reference list or a bibliography. This Example will help you be objective and take a
transparent approach. You can argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine
various theorical concepts to create a framework for your research. The summary effect size is a value
that reflects the average magnitude of the intervention effect for a particular outcome of interest or,
more generally, the strength of a relationship between two variables across all studies included in the
systematic review. A basic guide to writing a literature review Here are the most common ones: 1.
Your instructor will probably not expect you to read everything that’s out there on the topic, but
you’ll make your job easier if you first limit your scope. This book examines the relevant roles, skills
and knowledge needed to build the institutional research capacity across the. Here are some
examples: Chronological: The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time,
which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance if you are introducing something
that is not commonly known in your field). The scope of your review will depend on your topic and
discipline: in the sciences you usually only review recent literature, but in the humanities you might
take a long historical perspective (for example, to trace how a concept has changed in meaning over
time). For instance, the sperm whale review could focus on the development of the harpoon for
whale hunting. The purpose is to develop a body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint.
Find Models Use the exercise of reviewing the literature to examine how authors in your discipline
or area of interest have composed their literature review sections.
The extracted data must be presented in a meaningful way that suggests a new contribution to the
extant literature ( Jesson et al., 2011 ). Webster and Watson (2002) warn researchers that literature
reviews should be much more than lists of papers and should provide a coherent lens to make sense
of extant knowledge on a given topic. The Research Gap The third essential ingredient of a high-
quality literature review is a discussion of the research gap (or gaps). In this case, the purpose is to
evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of scholarly debates around a
topic. Selection Methods: Criteria you used to select (and perhaps exclude) sources in your literature
review. A literature review may be a stand alone work or the introduction to a larger research paper,
depending on the assignment. Part Two focuses on the values and principles that shape the
programme and emphasises the importance of understanding and making explicit some of the hidden
values that affect the programme. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your
literature review. Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the
direction of the field. The purpose of a literature review is to: -Demonstrate that you have an
understanding of the existing research on your topic; -Identify any gaps in this research; -Relate your
topic to the broader field of study; -Provide a theoretical framework for your research; -Identify any
key researchers in your field. But if you find yourself wanting to put in more quotes, check with your
instructor. While conducting a review of the literature, maximize the time you devote to writing this
part of your paper by thinking broadly about what you should be looking for and evaluating. It is our
hope that our descriptive account will serve as a valuable source for those conducting, evaluating or
using reviews in this important and growing domain. Consistencies between qualitative and
quantitative data were found for attitude and capacity and disconnects between qualitative and
quantitative data were found for knowledge, cyberinfrastructure, time, and quality. Confirmatory
Factor Analysis and internal consistency results support the inclusion of the items and factors
measured by the ECAI. A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key
sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis
). Both authors independently reviewed each of the identified articles to determine eligibility and
extract study information. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a paper. Consider
Whether Your Sources are Current Some disciplines require that you use information that is as
current as possible. Selecting studies, extracting data, and assessing risk of bias in a duplicate manner
using two independent reviewers to avoid random or systematic errors in the process. If you are
asked to provide an abstract, you should include 5-7 key words that are of most relevance to your
study. That is because the survey nature of the literature review does not allow for in-depth
discussion or detailed quotes from the text. The authors conducted a comprehensive search on
multiple databases to identify eligible reviews and subsequently used a validated instrument to
conduct an in-depth quality appraisal. Reported outcomes at the individual level included attitudes,
knowledge, and behaviors and at the organizational level included practices, leadership, culture,
mainstreaming, and resources. Then we examine the case according to King’s (2002) four elements
of ECB: teachers, students, the curriculum, and the context. So, this section is where you’ll pin
down what exactly you mean when you refer to X, Y or Z in your study, as well as why you chose
that specific definition. It is also helpful to use as a guide is the searches are not finding any useful
results. Depending on the methodology needed to achieve the purpose of the review, all types can be
helpful and appropriate to reach a specific goal (for examples, please see Table 1).These approaches
can be qualitative, quantitative, or have a mixed design depending on the phase of the review. We
believe it is important for policy makers and practitioners to get to grips with this theory, especially
given criticism that EIPM research and interventions fail to account of the messy reality of policy
processes. Abstract In recent times, healthcare organizations have increasingly been placing a lot of
emphasis on improving hospital supply chain performance. Depending on the situation, the literature
review may evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant.
Chapter V, “ The Literature Review,” describes a variety of methods to help you organize the
themes. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. Common
elements for successful evaluation capacity building (ECB) include: a tailored strategy based on
needs assessment, an organizational commitment to evaluation and ECB, experiential learning,
training with a practical element, and some form of ongoing technical support within the workplace.
When you have multiple sources cited in a paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing them
(not always, but often Read more about synthesis here. Check with your professor, or a subject
expert in the field, if you are missing any key works in the field. Be selective Select only the most
important points in each source to highlight in the review. In other words, you do not want to delve
into idle speculation. Red bars indicate TFF proposals received for last round of Collaboration
Funding. New York: Longman. Troyka, Lynn Quittman, and Doug Hesse. 2016. Simon and Schuster
Handbook for Writers, 11th ed. It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation, or research paper,
in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge. When you are assigned a literature
review, you should always read the entire work before writing your review. For example, a review of
the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics could focus on the development of online
political satire. Clearly identify the key or most relevant sources of research you intend to use and
explain how they will contribute to your analysis of the topic. We revise these tips periodically and
welcome feedback. It (Literature Review), in fact, sample survey and survives on scholarly articles
and other sources such as dissertations and conference proceedings. And depending on the situation,
the literature review may evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or
relevant. This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students
about writing a literature review. The literature review gives you a chance to: Demonstrate your
familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context Develop a theoretical framework and
methodology for your research Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists Show
how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate Evaluate the current state of research
and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic. Like any other
academic text, your literature review should have an introduction, a main body, and a conclusion.
There is no preconceived plan to systematically review all of the literature although this can be done.
Qualitative versus quantitative research Empirical versus theoretical scholarship Divide the research
by sociological, historical, or cultural sources Theoretical: In many humanities articles, the literature
review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. In order to minimize the risk of omitting
eligible studies not captured by the original search, they supplemented all electronic searches with
manual screening of trial registers and references contained in the included studies. Create a matrix
of the studies for easy analysis, and synthesis, across all of the studies. At this point consider: Does
your study extend current research. You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical
approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research. A
summary is a recap of the important information of the source, whereas a synthesis is a re-
organization, or a reshuffling, of that information. In order to further advance the application of
theory-based evaluation, the article elaborates a specific causal model for the in-depth evaluation of
capacity-building interventions supported by the European Social Fund. The second type of coverage
consists of presenting materials that are representative of most other works in a given field or area.
Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge. Are the findings across the studies
similar or is there a lot of variation.
Findings from eight rct s involving 6,615 participants were pooled into meta-analyses to calculate the
magnitude of effects that mobile text message reminders have on the rate of attendance at healthcare
appointments compared to no reminders and phone call reminders. It can be helpful to make an
annotated bibliography, where you compile full reference information and write a paragraph of
summary and analysis for each source. Find Models Use the exercise of reviewing the literature to
examine how authors in your discipline or area of interest have composed their literature review
sections. The literature review of your study should contain the theoretical frameworks you are
following in your research study. Some questions to ask: How are they organizing their ideas. If your
assignment is not very specific, seek clarification from your instructor: Roughly how many sources
should you include. Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting Professional editors
proofread and edit your paper by focusing on: Academic style Vague sentences Style consistency
See an example To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you
understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. However, when they
returned to the literature to search for individual resilience factors, they discovered a small body of
literature in the child and youth psychology field. When writing a literature review, be sure to use
your own words and cite all of your sources properly to avoid plagiarism How to get started with
writing a literature review. Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint If you want to know more
about the research process, methodology, research bias, or statistics, make sure to check out some of
our other articles with explanations and examples. As with any scholarly research paper, you must
cite the sources you used in composing your research proposal. While this can be time consuming, it
is the proper way to undertake a literature review. Convey it to your reader A literature review may
not have a traditional thesis statement (one that makes an argument), but you do need to tell readers
what to expect. Research and Decision Support in Higher Education Trial Ebook. For example, a
book surveying the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict may include a chapter on the role Egypt
has played in mediating the conflict, or look in the index for the pages where Egypt is mentioned in
the text. In the preceding example, Falk and Mills either directly refer in the text to the author of
their source, such as Hamilton, or they provide ample notation in the text when the ideas they are
mentioning are not their own, for example, Gastil’s. Review not just what scholars are saying, but
how are they saying it. Sheppard and Williams (2016) had not discovered these individual factors in
their original literature review on community and environmental resilience. Since they are forced to
evaluate, summarize, and compare research, they can improve their ability and skill. The Research
Proposal 83 Components of the Literature Review Krathwohl (2005) suggests and describes a
variety of components to include in a research proposal. It is an essential component of any research
paper or dissertation, and should be carefully crafted to provide a comprehensive and critical
evaluation of the research in the field. Plants don’t have highly specialized receptors like animals do.
Try writing a simple statement that lets the reader know what is your main organizing principle.
There is a conclusion with the thesis or purpose statement. It shows how to make a decent attempt to
address the course of your study plan. All in all, 130 articles met the criteria and their data were
extracted manually into a database. Missed appointments are a major cause of inefficiency in
healthcare delivery with substantial monetary costs to health systems. These authors sought to assess
whether mobile phone-based appointment reminders delivered through Short Message Service ( sms
) or Multimedia Messaging Service ( mms ) are effective in improving rates of patient attendance and
reducing overall costs. Yet Another Writing Tip When Do I Know I Can Stop Looking and Move On.
To this end, they conducted a comprehensive search on multiple databases using highly sensitive
search strategies without language or publication-type restrictions to identify all rct s that are eligible
for inclusion. The approach to data integration demonstrated in this paper represents a novel way to
tap the generative potential of divergence that arises when different methods produce contradictory
results.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria must be established to help researchers eliminate studies that are not
aligned with the research questions. It provides a comprehensive overview of the existing research
on a particular topic, highlighting the major findings and theories that have been proposed. Clearly
identify the key or most relevant sources of research you intend to use and explain how they will
contribute to your analysis of the topic. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool
for students. Step One: Decide on your areas of research: Before you begin to search for articles or
books, decide beforehand what areas you are going to research. You’ll need to present a critical
analysis that addresses some (if not all) of the following questions: What have different studies found
in relation to your research questions. Information systems researchers, among others, have
contributed to advancing knowledge on how to structure a “traditional” review. Thematic reviews
are organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time, although the progression of
time may still be incorporated into a thematic review. The MeSH term analysis also suggested a
strong interdisciplinary trend. What are the benefits of writing a literature review. Many student
writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they
are citing; here are some strategies to help you: It often helps to remember that the point of these
kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you understand your research, to help them read the
rest of your paper. In addition to providing the reader with background information relevant to the
topic or research question, a literature review may help to identify gaps in the current body of
knowledge or criticize previous research practices as a way to present potential for future research.
The author states that the majority of children with ASD are likely to engage in disruptions. You can
also use this method to consider what is currently of interest to scholars in this field and what is not.
The middle or main body should: organise the literature according to common themes; provide
insight into the relation between your chosen topic and the wider subject area e.g. between obesity in
children and obesity in general; move from a general, wider view of the literature being reviewed to
the specific focus of your research. As our case is new, we must think anew and act anew. If it’s
your first time writing a literature review, you definitely want to use this link to get 50% off the
course (limited-time offer). Well, the research gap should serve as the core justification for your
study. September 13, 2004. Presented by: Atul Malhotra, FCAS, MAAA. This is called citation
tracking and there are a number of sources that can help you identify who has cited whom,
particularly scholars from outside of your discipline. For example, a review of the Internet’s impact
on American presidential politics could focus on the development of online political satire.
University of Toronto Health Sciences Writing Centre. The content will look slightly different in each
case, but the process of conducting a literature review follows the same steps. As you’re doing your
research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this type of document ). For
guidance on formatting citations, please see the UNC Libraries citation tutorial. Then this Historical
Literature Review Example voices your familiarity with the topic. Remember, the methods section is
not simply a list of tasks to be undertaken. Once you have done this, you can begin to analyze and
synthesize the information you have found. By statistically combining data from multiple studies,
meta-analyses can create more precise and reliable estimates of intervention effects than those
derived from individual studies alone, when these are examined independently as discrete sources of
information. Importantly, narrative reviews can also be used as educational articles to bring
practitioners up to date with certain topics of issues ( Green et al., 2006 ). Recently, there have been
several efforts to introduce more rigour in narrative reviews that will elucidate common pitfalls and
bring changes into their publication standards.
Every Child Matters SEF Extended schools provision. How does the publication contribute to your
understanding of the topic. A literature review I am currently working on, for example, explores.
This demonstrates to your reader that you know what you are going to do and how you are going to
do it. The occasion is piled high with difficulty and we must rise with the occasion. All in all, 130
articles met the criteria and their data were extracted manually into a database. It is often assigned as
part of the research process for a paper. In order to further advance the application of theory-based
evaluation, the article elaborates a specific causal model for the in-depth evaluation of capacity-
building interventions supported by the European Social Fund. Overall, your list of citations should
be a testament to the fact that you have done a sufficient level of preliminary research to ensure that
your project will complement, but not duplicate, previous research efforts. You can use a subheading
for each theme, time period, or methodological approach. Notice that Falk and Mills do quote certain
terms that were coined by the author, not common knowledge, or taken directly from the study. The
scope of your review will depend on your topic and discipline: in the sciences you usually only
review recent literature, but in the humanities you might take a long historical perspective (for
example, to trace how a concept has changed in meaning over time). When you have answers to
these questions you can begin searching for sources. Privacy Overview Have a language expert
improve your writing Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references
for free. As you begin writing your research proposal it is helpful to think of the introduction as a
narrative of what it is you want to do, written in one to three paragraphs. Publications Account
settings Browse Titles NCBI Bookshelf. A description of the research design or general approach
used to guide the reading and analysis of the literature (this may be organized chronologically, by
subjects, by theoretical framework, etc.). A summary of the main themes or arguments emerging
from your critical review of the literature. While the study focuses on one topic, the Internet’s impact
on American presidential politics, it would still be organized chronologically reflecting technological
developments in media. Simply put, empirical research includes any study that involves actual data
collection and analysis, whether that’s qualitative data, quantitative data, or a mix of both. Finally,
you can write your literature review, drawing on what you have learned from the relevant literature.
This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without
permission. Depending on the methodology needed to achieve the purpose of the review, all types
can be helpful and appropriate to reach a specific goal (for examples, please see Table 1).These
approaches can be qualitative, quantitative, or have a mixed design depending on the phase of the
review. A literature review, like a term paper, is usually organized around ideas, not the sources
themselves as an annotated bibliography would be organized. We discuss the implications of using a
validated model and instrument in evaluation capacity building research and practice. Read them to
get a sense of the types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or to identify
ways to organize your final review. A chronological compilation of studies The reason for conducting
a literature review is to: Literature Reviews: An Overview for Graduate Students While this 9-minute
video from NCSU is geared toward graduate students, it is useful for anyone conducting a literature
review. Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into
subsections. The Research Gap The third essential ingredient of a high-quality literature review is a
discussion of the research gap (or gaps). Confirmatory Factor Analysis and internal consistency
results support the inclusion of the items and factors measured by the ECAI. There are many
literature review sample outline examples available online, and many of them have to do with
whatever subject you’re handling.