Title: Mastering the Art of Systematic and Integrative Literature Reviews

Embarking on the journey of crafting a literature review can often feel like navigating through a
labyrinth of scholarly works, theories, and perspectives. Whether you're a seasoned academic or a
newcomer to the world of research, the task of synthesizing vast amounts of information into a
cohesive narrative can be daunting. However, fear not, for ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ is here to guide you
through this intricate process with precision and expertise.

At the heart of any literature review lies the dual challenge of comprehensiveness and coherence. A
systematic literature review demands meticulous attention to detail, requiring researchers to
methodically search, analyze, and synthesize existing literature on a specific topic. From defining
inclusion criteria to critically evaluating sources, each step requires careful deliberation to ensure the
integrity and rigor of the review.

But the complexity doesn't end there. Integrative literature reviews take the process a step further by
not only summarizing existing literature but also synthesizing diverse perspectives and theoretical
frameworks. This integrative approach requires a keen analytical mind and a nuanced understanding
of the subject matter to effectively identify patterns, contradictions, and gaps within the literature.

Navigating through this intricate web of scholarly discourse requires time, expertise, and unwavering
dedication. It's a task that demands not only scholarly acumen but also patience and perseverance.
And that's where ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ comes in.

With a team of seasoned researchers and writers, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers unparalleled expertise
in crafting literature reviews that meet the highest academic standards. Whether you're struggling to
define your research questions, sift through mountains of literature, or synthesize disparate sources
into a coherent narrative, our team is here to lighten your load.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you're not just outsourcing a task –
you're investing in a partner who is committed to your academic success. With our meticulous
attention to detail, unwavering commitment to quality, and dedication to meeting deadlines, we
ensure that your literature review is not just a scholarly exercise but a testament to your academic
prowess.

So why struggle alone when you can enlist the support of ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔? Let us help you
navigate the labyrinth of scholarly discourse and emerge with a literature review that not only meets
but exceeds expectations. Contact us today and take the first step towards mastering the art of
systematic and integrative literature reviews.
The strengths of an integrative review include its capacity to analyse research literature, evaluate the
quality of the evidence, identify knowledge gaps, amalgamate research from various research
designs, generate research questions and develop theoretical frameworks ( Russell, 2005 ). Thus,
integrative reviews have the potential to build upon nursing science, informing research, practice,
and. Data is combined and re-analyzed, providing a greater statistical power than any single study
alone. Search databases to see if a review has already been published on your topic. We don’t know
if it prevents maternal deaths, as this would require very large studies to detect an effect. Some
things to keep in mind as you begin your own research and writing are ways to avoid the most
common errors seen in the first attempt at a literature review. Please read all of these boxes to make
sure you are following. The search terms, search strategies (including database names, platforms,
dates of search) and limits all need to be included in the review. While systematic reviews originated
with and continue to be a popular publication type in medicine and other health sciences fields, more
and more researchers in other disciplines are choosing to conduct evidence syntheses. This should be
conducted or reviewed by a second member of the research team, which occurred within this case
study. The way you analyze and provide critical review determines your grades. Peer review in an
integral part of scientific publishing by helping maintain the credibility and integrity of scientific
literature. In case it is a scientific article being reviewed, the writer will be required to use database
searches to retrieve the for most of the students, an article review is confused with an article
summary. They are usually one of the first steps in research methodologies. Some systematic reviews
include a meta-analysis, which is quantitative technique for combining the results of multiple studies
to estimate a pooled effect size that takes variations in study size and quality into consideration. This
comprehensive range of resources includes over 3,000 records across seven publication types:
Evidence Based Recommended Practices, Evidence Summaries, Best Practice Information Sheets,
Systematic Reviews, Consumer Information Sheets, Systematic Review Protocols, and Technical
Reports. This example shows a specific type of effect size: relative risk. For example, groups of
scholars disagree about the best way to measure a physiological event, and as a result, use different
instruments and methodologies. See Table 1 of this article (Hoojimans et al. (2012). PLoS One, 7
(11): e48811) for a good example of describing the search methods. Thus, integrative reviews have
the potential to build upon nursing science, informing research, practice, and policy initiatives.
Comparison of elements involved with a PICOTS and SPIDER review question. ( Cooke et al. 2012;
Riva et al. 2012 ). Step 2: Determine the search strategy In determining a search strategy, it is
important for the novice nursing researcher to consider the databases employed, the search terms, the
Boolean operators, the use of truncation and the use of subject headings. You should begin by
screening titles and abstracts only, and then you'll examine the full text of any remaining articles.
Reviews, critiques, and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way. You will
also describe your search strategy, inclusion criteria, and overall methodology so that your review is
reputable and replicable. In qualitative reviews (reviews synthesising results of qualitative studies),
this information is beneficial for readers to recognise the underlying philosophical and paradigmatic
stance of the authors of the included articles. Before you start Getting Started Different Types of
Knowledge Syntheses Assemble a Team Develop your Protocol Eligibility Criteria Screening for
articles Data Extraction Critical appraisal What are Systematic Reviews. Therefore, while developing
literature summary tables, think twice before using the predeveloped themes. Check all articles that
made it through the full-text review for retractions, and remove any articles that have been retracted.
Source: johannafaith.com The critique begins by summarizing the article and then analyzes and
evaluates the author's research. Additionally, you may review the literature of different disciplines to
find deeper meaning and understanding of your topic.
When the outcome is something bad, like death, the intervention should be designed to reduce the
risk, which is represented by a risk ratio less than 1. These preregistration plans include a specific
search strategy using specific search terms for individual scholarly databases so other researchers can
recreate the search. Thematic networks emphasise the relationships and interconnectivity of the
network. However, the following steps are generally accepted in how Systematic Reviews are done:
Identify a gap in the literature and form a well-developed and answerable research question which
will form the basis of your search Select a framework that will help guide the type of study you’re
undertaking Different guidelines are used for documenting and reporting the protocols of your
systematic review before the review is conducted. You should read articles from one or more of
these sources to get examples. Please read all of these boxes to make sure you are following. As
such, the thesis or central argument of your historiography should explain why your research on the
topic contributes to or rejects previous historical analyses of your topic. Write the review Thompson
Writing Studio This link opens in a new window Need to write a systematic review. At the graduate
or doctoral level, the literature review is an essential feature of thesis and dissertation, as well as
grant proposal writing. Methods of analysis, synthesis, and conclusion-drawing remain poorly
formulated. Holistic nursing, integrative health care, and integrative nursing: report of an integrated
literature review. Collect - Each included study is coded and the quantitative or qualitative data
contained in these studies is then synthesized. For example, for a review about the effectiveness of
healthcare interventions, a literature summary table must include information about the intervention,
its type, content timing, duration, setting, effectiveness, negative consequences, and receivers and
implementers’ experiences of its usage. Naturally, the first thing i did was google how to write a
scientific review. Start by focusing on the red box and examine the comparative risk column that
shows the assumed risk among the control group. They are suitable for reviewing experimental and
theoretical studies concurrently. Again, two reviewers for each item is best practice. Merely noting
the quality score based on standardised critical appraisal templates is not adequate because the
readers should be able to identify the reasons for assigning a weak or moderate rating. You can then
use a tool like Rayyan (see below) to screen the results. Employing this structured and
comprehensive framework within the case study the authors were able to determine that there
remains a marked barrier in the provision of healthcare within the ED to women presenting with IPV-
related injury. Many recent critical appraisal checklists (eg, Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool)
discourage review authors from assigning a quality score and recommend noting the main strengths
and limitations of included studies. A systematic review is also a type of a literature review.
Elements of an integrative review, methods and guidance. It's best if you import search results into a
citation management tool (see below) to clean up the citations and remove any duplicates. SLRs are
a research method used to write an entire journal article. Web of Science Citation Indexes Web of
Science, published by Thomson Reuters, is a multi-disciplinary database that provides integrated
access to over 8,000 key research journals indexed in: Science Citation Index Expanded, Social
Science Citation Index, and Arts and Humanities Citation Index. Therefore, while developing
literature summary tables, think twice before using the predeveloped themes. Then, explain where
your work fits within this discussion and why. Keywords can be combined using the Boolean
operators, “and”, “or” and sometimes “not” to narrow down or expand the search results.
Each study’s point estimate of the relative risk is plotted around a line of “no effect.” A risk of 1
means that there is no difference between the intervention and control groups. Third, identify
patterns in approaches to your topic. There remains a paucity of literature that provides explicit
guidance to novice nursing researchers on how to conduct an integrative review and importantly how
to ensure the results and conclusions are both comprehensive and reliable. A summary is always
much shorter than the original text. When is an integrative review methodology appropiate. Omission
of a literature review chapter or section in a graduate-level project represents a serious void or
absence of critical element in the research process. This paper aims to provide a framework for
novice nursing researchers undertaking integrative reviews. A student taking a course in science deals
with several papers within their time in college. However, the quality of reviews is also contingent on
rigorous data extraction and synthesis, which require developing literature summaries. The date in
which the searches are undertaken should be within the search strategy as searches undertaken after
this date may generate increased results in line with the publication of further studies. It is a
comprehensive, transparent search that can be replicated and reproduced by other researchers. In the
Conclusion, the authors frame the overall results in terms of their implications for practice and
research. Cronin P, Ryan F, Coughlan M. (2008) Undertaking a literature review: A step by step
approach. The results of a meta-analysis are typically summarized in a forest plot like the one shown
in Figure 3.7. Let’s take a look at this helpful guide from Ried ( 2006 ) that breaks it all down. The
most commonly referred to type of evidence synthesis. Try to place your current work and research
within this wider discussion by considering how your research supports, contradicts, or departs from
other scholars’ research. Systematic, Scoping, and Other Literature Reviews: Overview Overview
Project Planning Searching Screening Covidence What Is a Systematic Review. Meta-Analysis,
Systematic, and Integrative Reviews: An Overview Highlights. Like any other social media
platform summary and reviews of i will always write back by martin ganda. They are usually one of
the first steps in research methodologies. Studies are not created equal, and the weight parameter lets
researchers account for these differences in the analysis. Very thorough! Systematic review or
scoping review. A journal article summary provides potential readers with a short. We will explore
these topics more in the next chapters. Creating a Search Strategy Limits and Inclusion Criteria
Review Protocols Elements of a Systematic Review Review Tools and Applications Not sure which
review type is right for your research question. In other words, it is the process of searching and
evaluating the available literature on your chosen topic. This is easily done by searching research
databases and protocol registries. Please read all of these boxes to make sure you are following. A
systematic review is also a type of a literature review. This type of review has the potential to shape
nursing science, informative research, clinical practice, and policy actions.
Armed with a BA degree in English and a knack for digital marketing, she explores her passions for
literature, history, culture, and food through her engaging and informative writing. There are several
established tools a novice nurse can employ in which to structure their critical appraisal. An
integrative review can be used to answer research questions related to nursing and other disciplines.
The name lagged behind, appearing first in 1996, apparently referring to the tree-line optics typical
of most forest plots. Your intention of doing the research should define the type of review you
choose to use. Integrative Review An integrative review addresses the current state of the evidence,
the quality of the available evidence, identifies gaps in the literature and suggests future directions
for research and practice The clinical question (s) of an integrative review is broader than that of a
systematic review, yet should be clearly stated and well-defined. The critique begins by summarizing
the article and then analyzes and evaluates the author's research. A small number of high quality
studies with a low risk of bias is preferable to lots of poorly reported or conducted studies. The
approach used in a thematic analysis is important though a cursory glance at many literature reviews
will reveal that many authors do not delineate the methods they employ. Meta-Analysis, Systematic,
and Integrative Reviews: An Overview Highlights. Extract and Synthesize Extract the data from
what's left of the studies that have been analyzed Extraction tools are used to get data from
individual studies that will be analyzed or summarized. Summarize - The final report provides a
complete description of the methods and results in a clear, transparent fashion. A student taking a
course in science deals with several papers within their time in college. The protocol is created
following whatever guideline you select. Rapid Review Rapid reviews are systematic reviews
conducted under a time constraint. This is easily done by searching research databases and protocol
registries. While all reviews combat information overload in the health sciences by summarizing the
literature on a topic, different types of reviews have different approaches. In some cases, the
research question will drive the type of literature review that is undertaken. Peer review in an integral
part of scientific publishing by helping maintain the credibility and integrity of scientific literature.
Inclusion of both quantitative and qualitative findings within the themes facilitated integration of the
data which identified patterns and generated insights into the current care provided to IPV victims
within ED. SLRs may be quantitative (by only reviewing quantitative studies), qualitative (by only
reviewing qualitative studies), or mixed methods (by reviewing both quantitative and qualitative
studies). If a publication or agency does not require one, submitting one is optional, but writing one
as part of the process is fundamental. So the point is, to write a review one has to have a logical
argument and this logical argument should then follow through the remaining research report work
that one does! Creating a Search Strategy Limits and Inclusion Criteria Review Protocols Elements
of a Systematic Review Review Tools and Applications Not sure which review type is right for your
research question. While systematic reviews originated with and continue to be a popular publication
type in medicine and other health sciences fields, more and more researchers in other disciplines are
choosing to conduct evidence syntheses. Please read all of these boxes to make sure you are
following. Are you a researcher or just a student who is up for a college project. Mark Scott is an
Emergency Medical Consultant with a track record in advancing emergency healthcare through
implementation of evidence-based healthcare. Guidance for authors when choosing between a
systematic or scoping review approach. Database name (be as specific as possible, including the full
title, especially for databases that are offered in multiple formats, e.g. Ovid Medline) and dates of
coverage.
Aveyard and Bradbury-Jones (2019) found more than 35 commonly used terms to describe literature
reviews. At a basic level, the term implies a survey of factual or nonfiction books, articles, and other
documents published on a particular subject. Data extracted for study characteristics and concept.
Empirical literature reviews present their summaries in quantifiable terms using descriptive and
inferential statistics. You should begin by screening titles and abstracts only, and then you'll examine
the full text of any remaining articles. Regular literature reviews are simply summaries of the
literature on a particular topic. Mark Scott is an Emergency Medical Consultant with a track record in
advancing emergency healthcare through implementation of evidence-based healthcare. A student
taking a course in science deals with several papers within their time in college. These key elements
may assist the novice nursing researcher in determining the search terms they employ. During the
preparation of this narrative review, the literature on e-cigarettes available within the network
PubMed was retrieved and examined. For example, the authors of a review article noted that one of
the research articles included in their review demonstrated the usefulness of case studies and
reflective logs as strategies for fostering compassion in nursing students. Fourth, analyze the patterns
you noted by considering similarities and differences between sources. Module 1: Introduction to
conducting systematic reviews. The short-term impact of e-cigarettes on human health has been
studied mostly in experimental setting. The commonly used information may include authors,
purpose, methods, key results and quality scores. Figure 2 is an example of the PRISMA flow
diagram as it was applied within the case study. This critical appraisal tool contains 10 items. These
items are yes or no questions that assist the researcher to determine (a) if the results of the paper are
valid, (b) what the results are and (c) if it is relevant in the context of their study. It may in fact be
possible to make such predictions subconsciously (now, if you ask me, this is an interesting scientific
question someone should do an experiment on!). They introduce readers to the surrounding literature
while also situating your work within the larger scholarly discussion on that topic. Thematic analysis
with the development of a thematic network is a way of identifying themes at various levels and
depicting the observed relationships and organisation of these themes ( Attride-Stirling, 2001 ). A
systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products. In the
case study, the review question was to: identify, evaluate and synthesise current knowledge and
healthcare approaches to women presenting due to intimate partner violence (IPV) within emergency
departments (ED). Various reasons prompt students to seek assistance with their assignments. So
whatever literature one reviews are meant for re-viewing by others too. Formal and comprehensive
harness inspection before first use and at least every 6 months thereafter. A thematic network is a
visual depiction that appears graphically as a web like design ( Attride-Stirling, 2001 ). Creating an
effective search for a systematic review means walking a tightrope between comprehensiveness and
managability. Systematic reviews include experimental studies, and many times only randomized
controlled trials. A systematic review is also a type of a literature review. A second screening was
then undertaken based on the full text of retrieved publications to remove papers that were irrelevant
to the research question.