Title: Crafting an Exemplary Methodology Section Literature Review

Welcome to our guide on crafting an exemplary methodology section literature review. As any
seasoned academic will attest, writing a literature review can be a daunting task. It requires extensive
research, critical analysis, and adept synthesis of existing scholarly works. However, fear not, as
we're here to guide you through the intricacies of this crucial academic exercise.

A literature review serves as the foundation of your research methodology, providing the context,
theoretical framework, and justification for your chosen approach. It involves systematically
examining and evaluating relevant studies, theories, and concepts to identify gaps, patterns, and
contradictions in the existing literature.

The process begins with thorough research, scouring databases, journals, books, and other reputable
sources to gather a comprehensive collection of literature related to your research topic. Once
collected, you must critically evaluate each source, assessing its relevance, reliability, and
significance to your study.

Next comes the synthesis phase, where you analyze and organize the literature thematically or
chronologically to highlight key concepts, debates, and findings. This requires careful attention to
detail and the ability to discern patterns and connections among diverse sources.

Crafting a methodology section literature review requires precision and clarity. You must succinctly
summarize the main arguments, methodologies, and findings of each source while providing
insightful commentary and analysis. It's essential to demonstrate your understanding of the literature
and articulate how it informs your research approach.

Moreover, a well-written literature review demonstrates your academic credibility and sets the stage
for your own research. It establishes the theoretical and conceptual framework for your study,
guiding readers through the rationale behind your chosen methodology and research questions.

While the task may seem daunting, remember that you don't have to navigate it alone. At ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔, we specialize in assisting students and researchers with their academic writing
needs. Our team of experienced writers and researchers can help you craft a comprehensive and
compelling literature review tailored to your specific requirements.

With our assistance, you can confidently tackle the challenges of writing a methodology section
literature review, ensuring that your research stands out for its rigor and scholarly excellence. So why
wait? Order your literature review today and take the first step towards academic success.
Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. And in your plans for us
there is none to equal you, should I. This research is conducted not to find out the knowledge base
about the particularsubject but to investigate social change and empowerment in the society and
culture. This is done to confirm your ideas, and to turn data into information, writing process, and
research method. Step 5: Extract the data Extracting the data means collecting information from the
selected studies in a systematic way. For example, you may find that you didn’t manage to draw in
enough respondents to achieve the desired sample size (and therefore, statistically significant results),
or your sample may be skewed heavily towards a certain demographic, thereby negatively impacting
representativeness. The sources include government simple reports, IT software websites, scholarly
articles, etc. Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the
direction of the field. To describe how study data were combined for analysis and synthesis,
reviewers outline the type of synthesis (narrative or quantitative, for example), the methods for
grouping data, the challenges that came up, and how these were dealt with. Focus groups (page 16)
example 3: I figured winter was over and the time had come once more for that buds to blossom, but
the actual snowbound in maryland. A summary is a recap of the important information of the source,
but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs how
you are planning to investigate a research problem. Results indicate that the majority of systematic
reviews in this particular area suffer from important methodological flaws and biases that impair their
internal validity and limit their usefulness for clinical and decision-making purposes. The ideal way
to demonstrate your research is with a qualitative or quantitative approach. If you need a helping
hand with your research methodology (or any other component of your research), be sure to check
out our private coaching service, where we hold your hand through every step of the research
journey. Estimate an effect size for each individual study 3. The current edition, however,
acknowledges that subjects can still be appropriate in referring to human participants in areas in
which it has traditionally been used (e.g., basic memory research). If you are writing the literature
review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your
research objectives and questions. A literature review is a type of review that uses a less systematic
and formal approach than a systematic review. In contrast, other types of manuscripts are prepared
by the author in their final form with no intention of submitting them for publication elsewhere. Thus
APA-style writing minimizes literary devices such as metaphor, imagery, irony, suspense, and so on.
Secondly, the methodology chapter is what helps to make your study replicable. What is a Literature
Review? - In Depth Evaluation of? Development of the Literature Review Four Basic Stages of
Writing 1. Posters often include elements that add visual interest. In other words, a chronological
review would have subsections for each vital time period; a thematic review would have subtopics
based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. Either way, the information is organized into
distinct sections, including a title, author names and affiliations, an introduction, a method section, a
results section, a discussion or conclusions section, references, and acknowledgments. Doing so
demonstrates your understanding of research design, which will earn you marks. Analysis: The
frequency table and pie chart shows us the satisfaction level of the ATM card. Giving readers a clear
sense of what the research is about and why they should care about it will motivate them to continue
reading the literature review—and will help them make sense of it. The methodology chapter plays
two important roles in your dissertation or thesis: Firstly, it demonstrates your understanding of
research theory, which is what earns you marks.
Sometimes in your literature review, you might need to discuss and evaluate relevant research
methodologies in order to justify your own choice of research methodology. Natural Sciences: In
natural sciences, literature reviews are used to summarize and evaluate the current state of
knowledge in a particular field or subfield. Make sure your research question is not too broad or too
narrow. Keep careful notes so that you may track your thought processes during the research process.
How does the publication contribute to your understanding of the topic. The methodology chapter is
where you outline the philosophical underpinnings of your research and outline the specific
methodological choices you've made. All students in sampled classes are eligible to participate
(cluster). This will help you identify similarities and differences among the literature, and provide a
structure for your literature review. A rigorous example of one such review in the eHealth domain is
presented by Mickan, Atherton, Roberts, Heneghan, and Tilson (2014) on the use of handheld
computers by healthcare professionals and their impact on access to information and clinical
decision-making. We begin with a discussion of American Psychological Association (APA)
style—the primary approach to writing taken by researchers in psychology and related fields. This
sometimes requires a main title followed by a subtitle that elaborates on the main title, in which case
the main title and subtitle are separated by a colon. This is an important step because having a plan
allows you to work more efficiently and reduces bias. Take notes and cite your sources As you read,
you should also begin the writing process. During an orientation meeting at the nursing home, the
rules and regulations were explained, one of which regarded the dining room. Figures can also be
used to illustrate theories (e.g., in the form of a flowchart), display stimuli, outline procedures, and
present many other kinds of information. Developing Theoretical Framework: Literature review
helps researchers develop a theoretical framework for their research. For instance, in the humanities,
authors might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their
literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results
in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in
scholarship. It typically includes an opening, a literature review, and a closing. In shorter scientific
papers, where the aim is to report the findings of a specific study, you might simply describe what
you did in a methods section. Evaluate the sources you find to determine if they are relevant to your
research question. So, be sure to always check the guidelines provided by your institution for clarity
and, if possible, review past dissertations from your university. Remember that you can use our
template to summarise and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. The second type of
coverage consists of presenting materials that are representative of most other works in a given field
or area. Increase the Security of ATM booth: A number of people is feel insecure to withdraw money.
Unleashing the Power of AI Tools for Enhancing Research, International FDP on. 2023 MAP Data
Analysis - St. They can help you make decisions about your protocol. Critically evaluate: mention
the strengths and weaknesses of your sources. A methodological scope will influence either the types
of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are discussed. Similar to a
systematic review, a scoping review is a type of review that tries to minimize bias by using
transparent and repeatable methods. Research objective (s): Rephrase your research question as an
objective.
The question needs to be about a topic that’s previously been studied by multiple researchers. For
example, quantitative data will often require some initial preparation such as removing duplicates or
incomplete responses. Fields such as biology, chemistry, and physics commonly use literature
reviews. Some use them regularly, while others never use them. Perhaps there is some evidence that
participants did not fully understand their task or that they were suspicious of the intent of the
researchers. The search terms used, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and any limitations of the search
are described. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria; 2017 Feb 27. It also helps researchers to identify
potential biases or limitations of certain methods and techniques. However, writing literature reviews
will be tedious without the right directives and methodology and result in irrelevant and incredible
outcomes. Why is it important to add Background of the Study in Research. The analytical features
of a literature review might: Give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old
interpretations, Trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates, Depending on
the situation, evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant research, or
Usually in the conclusion of a literature review, identify where gaps exist in how a problem has been
researched to date. How to write a literature review - Library and Learning Resources. Perhaps there
are problems with its internal or external validity. Of course, the body of the manuscript should still
have a logical organization and include an opening that identifies the topic and explains its
importance, a literature review that organizes previous research (identifying important relationships
among concepts or gaps in the literature), and a closing or conclusion that summarizes the main
conclusions and suggests directions for further research or discusses theoretical and practical
implications. How will you further your research as a result of the review? IV. Umbrella reviews
generally adhere to the same principles and rigorous methodological guidelines used in systematic
reviews. As you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this
type of document ). As such, reviewers may selectively ignore or limit the attention paid to certain
studies in order to make a point. To increase inter-rater reliability, ensure that everyone thoroughly
understands the selection criteria before you begin. This pilot study uncovered local political
problems and other issues that may be encountered during the main study. You should apply the
selection criteria in two phases: Based on the titles and abstracts: Decide whether each article
potentially meets the selection criteria based on the information provided in the abstracts. You can
argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts to
create a framework for your research. Literature reviews are commonly used in fields such as
sociology, psychology, anthropology, and political science. In other words, a chronological review
would have subsections for each vital time period; a thematic review would have subtopics based
upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. In this regard, we concur with Jesson, Matheson, and
Lacey (2011) that clearly articulated research questions are key ingredients that guide the entire
review methodology; they underscore the type of information that is needed, inform the search for
and selection of relevant literature, and guide or orient the subsequent analysis. Reviews of
healthcare interventions follow the PRISMA guidelines for the minimum set of items to report in the
methods section. A set of predetermined rules provides a basis for including or excluding certain
studies. In a longer report with multiple studies, it might require a paragraph or even two. This will
help you identify relevant literature and determine the scope of your review. This is an important step
because having a plan allows you to work more efficiently and reduces bias.
Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach. Systematic
Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Center for Reviews and Dissemination University of
York, England 2009. Here are 5 top tips from our experts to help prepare and achieve high quality
data extraction. This is where you would present test-retest correlations, Cronbach’s ?, or other
statistics to show that the measures are consistent across time and across items. A final preliminary
issue is whether the manipulation was successful. Case study report (page 29) example 4: Source:
i.pinimg.com The chapter then goes on to discuss the sample size and the sampling strategy applied
by the author, and the data analysis methods which have been used. This might mean multiple
questionnaires, written vignettes that participants read and respond to, perceptual stimuli, and so on.
Here are several strategies you can utilize to assess whether you've thoroughly reviewed the
literature: Look for repeating patterns in the research findings. Of course, you should consult the
Publication Manual or Online APA Style Resources for details on how to format them. Receive
feedback on language, structure, and formatting Professional editors proofread and edit your paper
by focusing on: Academic style Vague sentences Style consistency See an example A systematic
review is a good choice of review if you want to answer a question about the effectiveness of an
intervention, such as a medical treatment. You’ll need to discuss the studies and assess their overall
quality. Krishnaswami,o.r,methodology of research in social science,Mumbai:himalaya. ATM service
success is immediate as there is a demand for such service in the local. Make a list of keywords Start
by creating a list of keywords related to your research topic. The themes could also be a way of
evaluation; for example, the dark ages are associated with wars, death, witchcraft, and gothic
features. Overview: The Methodology Chapter The purpose of the methodology chapter Why you
need to craft this chapter (really) well How to write and structure the chapter Methodology chapter
example Essential takeaways What (exactly) is the methodology chapter. Importance of a Good
Literature Review A literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the
social sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary
and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories. The references themselves are then listed
alphabetically according to the last names of the first named author for each citation. (As in the rest
of an APA-style manuscript, everything is double-spaced.) Many different kinds of works might be
cited in APA-style articles and book chapters, including magazine articles, websites, government
documents, and even television shows. The in-depth interview procedure for this study will be
limited to Dhaka city only as there are. Look for peer-reviewed articles, books, and other academic
sources that are relevant to your research question or topic. This resulted in the dis-engaging of this
research as methodology. Tips For Writing Your First Scientific tukioka-clinic.com write review
example writing examples essay plagiarism samples publication critical pdf rgstatic i1 literature
process scientific Research Literature Review Sample By Lit Review Samples - Issuu issuu.com
literature review research sample lit samples slideshare. To this end, they provide a number of
recommendations to strengthen knowledge development towards improving the design and
execution of future reviews on home telemonitoring. 9.4. Summary Table 9.1 outlines the main types
of literature reviews that were described in the previous sub-sections and summarizes the main
characteristics that distinguish one review type from another. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research
Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart,
Chris. Conceiving the research question and developing the study plan. As always, a lot depends on
the type of review but it will certainly contain information relating to the following areas: Selection
criteria. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. Henning
(2004:36) describes methodology as coherent group of methods that For example, a qualitative
methodology might be used to understand peoples' perceptions about an event that took place, or a
candidate running for president. Key Concepts (one main section per theme and then sub sections as
necessary to help organize your work and make it easier to read) 5. Finally, the conclusion should
summarize the whole review in a reasonably convincing manner.
Question No-5: there is available ATM booth all over the country. The FMCH provides free medical,
antenatal, delivery and post-natal care for poor women and children in primary and secondary
hospitals, and those referred to tertiary hospitals in the State. Like most things in a systematic
review, the methods should be planned upfront and ideally described in detail in a project plan or
protocol. Selects and sources the information that is necessary to. Make a list of keywords Start by
creating a list of keywords related to your research topic. If you’re writing a systematic review as a
student for an assignment, you might not have a team. You can elaborate more on the topic of your
thesis. This sometimes requires a main title followed by a subtitle that elaborates on the main title, in
which case the main title and subtitle are separated by a colon. By analyzing and synthesizing
existing literature, researchers can identify the key concepts, theories, and models that are relevant to
their research. If you are looking for dissertation methodology examples to help with writing your
own then take a look at the below examples covering various subjects. Cook, Kathleen E. and Elise
Murowchick. “Do Literature Review Skills Transfer from One Course to Another?” Psychology
Learning and Teaching 13 (March 2014): 3-11; Fink, Arlene. If you’re a professional seeking to
publish your review, it’s a good idea to bring together an advisory committee. It is crucial to
communicate regularly about your research with your professor, who will have the ability to present
valuable comments on the change of your hypothesis when performing the literature review. Include
each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms.
You can add to this list if you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search. The
ideal way to demonstrate your research is with a qualitative or quantitative approach. This will help
you identify similarities and differences among the literature, and provide a structure for your
literature review. ATM service success is immediate as there is a demand for such service in the local.
It’s a good idea to consider what readers will want to know about the review methods and whether
the journal you’re planning to submit the work to has expectations on the reporting of methods. If
there is more than one, the headings are “Appendix A,” “Appendix B,” and so on, and they appear in
the order they were first mentioned in the text of the report. A meta-analysis is a technique to
synthesize results from multiple studies. Bangladesh. Amongst banks, DBBL is the largest donor in
to social causes in Bangladesh. It. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can
combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each
theme is discussed chronologically). Finally, we look at some of the many other ways in which
researchers present their work, including review and theoretical articles, theses and other student
papers, and talks and posters at professional meetings. Source: image.isu.pub In this category of
methods, both the teacher and the learners have to fit into the content that is taught. To this end, they
conducted a comprehensive search on multiple databases using highly sensitive search strategies
without language or publication-type restrictions to identify all rct s that are eligible for inclusion.
There are various impediments to reducing maternal mortality with roots in cultural, social, economic
and systemic factors prevalent in SSA. Be sure that you start with your General Field first before
referring to your dissertation study. Lack of original data: Literature reviews do not generate new
data, but rather rely on the analysis of existing studies. What are some strategies or tips I can use
while writing my lit review. This feeling of discomfort was called cognitive dissonance by social
psychologist Leon Festinger (1957), who suggested that individuals will be motivated to remove this
dissonance in whatever way they can (p. 191).
Covidence’s default template for assessing study quality is Cochrane’s risk of bias tool but it is also
possible to start from scratch and build a tool with a set of custom domains if you prefer. If you’re a
student, you should narrow the scope of your systematic review and stick to a tight schedule. The
literature review acknowledges the work of previous researchers, and in so doing, assures the reader
that your work has been well conceived. Example Of Methodology - (PDF) Introduction,
Methodology, Limitations: If you are looking for dissertation methodology examples to help with
writing your own then take a look at the below examples covering various subjects. It would be quite
impressive if it is possible to choose a theme that shows the ways in which the terms of patients from
Third World countries or tribal areas can be improved with the support of appropriate nursing
practices. However, there are also many good websites on APA style, which do an excellent job of
presenting the basics for beginning researchers. Pamela Fry. Writing Centre. Literature Review
Template. Identifying potential research questions: A literature review can help to identify potential
research questions and areas for further investigation. This allows them to develop new research
questions and hypotheses to fill those gaps. Then this Literature Review Examples may help you to
write your thesis in no time. Specifically, the study will examine the effects of cyberbullying, social
comparison, and excessive social media use on self-esteem, anxiety, and depression. The first is that
the number of slides should be no more than about one per minute of the talk. The Writing Center.
University of North Carolina; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. Write in well-structured paragraphs: use
transitions and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts. A scoping review on
the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. While the study focuses on one topic, the Internet’s
impact on American presidential politics, it would still be organized chronologically reflecting
technological developments in media. There are a number of different situations where you might
write a literature review, each with slightly different expectations; different disciplines, too, have
field-specific expectations for what a literature review is and does. Risk of plagiarism: It is important
to ensure that literature reviews do not inadvertently contain plagiarism, which can occur when
researchers use the work of others without proper attribution. Based on your reading and notes, you
can look for: Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more
or less popular over time. Source: image.isu.pub In this category of methods, both the teacher and
the learners have to fit into the content that is taught. Only the first word of a book title is capitalized
(with the exceptions noted for article titles), and the entire title is italicized. Missed appointments are
a major cause of inefficiency in healthcare delivery with substantial monetary costs to health
systems. These authors sought to assess whether mobile phone-based appointment reminders
delivered through Short Message Service ( sms ) or Multimedia Messaging Service ( mms ) are
effective in improving rates of patient attendance and reducing overall costs. One strategy is to scan
relevant journals or conference proceedings. Because they do not report the results of new empirical
research, however, there is no method or results section. It should be a fair representation of the
perspectives and voices of a range of scholars across the field. Often, a lot of information needs to
be distilled into just a few paragraphs. Qualitative versus quantitative research Empirical versus
theoretical scholarship Divide the research by sociological, historical, or cultural sources Theoretical:
In many humanities articles, the literature review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. A
literature review is important because it: Explains the background of research on a topic. However,
there are other kinds of manuscripts that are written in APA style, many of which will not be
submitted for publication elsewhere. Finally, provide a conclusion that summarizes the key findings
of the literature review, identifies gaps in knowledge, and suggests areas for future research.