WFP 0000070003
WFP 0000070003
WFP 0000070003
LIVES
CHANGING
LIVES
With support from Cargill and WFP, the Ministry of Education and Culture helps poor
students across the country enjoy healthy meals and learn about nutrition and hygiene
through Indonesia’s home-grown school meals programme (known as Pro-GAS). We
are leveraging school meals not only as a source of nutrition, but also as an economic
opportunity for local farmers. WFP in partnership with Cargill foster sustainable
school meals supply chains and at the same time promote nutritious, balanced diets
with a particular focus on primary aged students, women and youth.
This partnership is aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2 (zero
hunger) and 4 (quality education), while also impacting SDG 17 (partnerships to
achieve the SDG goals).
Through funds from Cargill in 2017, WFP was able to provide capacity strengthening
support for the Ministry of Education and Culture. Targets for the national school
meals in 2017 have increased across five provinces to 100,000 students and 563
primary schools across 11 stunting priority districts, as compared to 38,500 students
and 150 primary schools across four districts in 2016 when Pro-GAS started.
Under the 2017 WFP-Cargill partnership, Pro-GAS model was replicated in three
districts –- Serang, Pasuruan and Belu -- in addition to the 11 priority districts selected
by Indonesia’s Ministry of Education and Culture. The WFP-Cargill partnership was
extended to one primary school in Serang district, Banten province, two schools in
Pasuruan district, East Java province and one primary school in Belu district, Eastern
Nusa Tenggara province.
More specifically, the endline survey compared the findings between baseline and
endline data of the following indicators:
a) Students’ knowledge of nutrition, health and hygiene
b) Personal hygiene of school chidlren;
c) Students’ food consumption habits;
d) Students’ access to safe drinking water;
e) Students’ academic performance;
f) Students reported ill in the past month;
g) Attendance Rates’ (number of absences in the past six months);
h) Students concentration in class;
i) Physical fitness of school children; and
j) Nutritional status of school children;
Number of subjects
District School name Treatment
Boys Girls Total
Serang SDN Citawa Intervention 5 10 15
Serang SDN Gorda I Control 12 20 32
Pasuruan SDN Ngerong Intervention 27 18 45
Pasuruan SDN Wedoro 2 Control 13 3 16
Pasuruan SDN Gunung Sari 2 Intervention 10 3 13
Pasuruan SDN Pogar 2 Control 29 25 54
Total 97 79 175
The procedures and tools that were used are described as follows:
1. In-depth interviews using structured questionnaires for school children in order
to collect general information such as date of birth, reported illness, personal
hygiene, concentration and hunger, activity during class session, food
consumption habits, as well as nutrition, health and hygiene knowledge;
The lead researcher provided a training for enumerators prior to the start of data
collection. The enumerators were also responsible to check the completeness of
information in the questionnaires, hemoglobin measurement and anthropometry
measurement. All completed questionnaires were then compiled for data entry and
analysis.
Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS 20 to obtain students’ nutritional indices,
a macro for SPSS of the WHO Anthro v.1.0.2 was used for this purpose. Subsequently,
data was checked and cleaned to prepare for data analysis.
Bivariate analysis was used to assess the different findings of the baseline and endline
surveys and between intervention and control groups using chi-square test for
categorical data and independent T-test for continuous data.
The nutritional status of children was categorized according to the WHO cut-off
values for public health significance:
1. Stunting prevalence
- Low: < 20 percent
- Medium: 20-29 percent
- High: 30-39 percent
- Very high: 40 percent
2. Wasting prevalence
- Acceptable: 5 percent
- Poor: 5-9 percent
- Serious: 10-14 percent
- Critical: ≥ 15 percent
The food consumption score was calculated based on consumption of several food
groups consumed in the preceding week. These food groups include: (i)
Cereals/staple; (ii) Vitamin A rich vegetables and tubers; (iii) Green leafy vegetables;
(iv) Other vegetables and fruits; (v) Vitamin A rich fruits; (vi) Meat; (vii) Eggs; (viii)
Fish.
Nutrition and health knowledge and practice was assessed through questions on food
for breakfast, balanced diets, food groups as source of energy and protein, safe
drinking water, personal hygiene, food safety/hygiene, and food purchased outside
(from street and/or school vendors).
Children considered with good knowledge if they could answer correctly at least 75
percent of the questions on nutrition and health.
3. Results
87.7 87.3 92
71.2
Intervention Control
baseline endline
Percentage
Description Intervention Control
BL EL Sig. BL EL Sig.
Breakfast should contain
nutritious, healthy and safe 87.7 96.9 * 94.1 99.0 NS
foods
Nutritionally balanced diets
consumed 3 times a day helps
86.3 92.3 * 93.1 92.0 NS
you to maintain your health
baseline endline
Table 5. Personal Hygiene and Grooming Habits amongst Students
Percentage
Description Intervention Control
BL EL Sig. BL EL Sig.
Brushing teeth before
sleeping
- Every *** NS
74.0 96.7 88.1 92.0
day/sometimes
- Never 26.0 3.3 11.9 8.0
Nail condition 54.8 66.2 ** 76.5 53.8 **
Students who washed their
hands with soap and
running water prior to
NS NS
eating and after defecating
- Always/often 93.2 95.4 99.0 98.0
- Never 6.8 4.6 1.0 2.0
Intervention Control
Percentage
Percentage
In addition, more students in both groups consumed fruits and vegetables: 13.1
percent as compared to 6.8 percent.
Percentage
Description Intervention Control
BL EL Sig. BL EL Sig.
Consuming
balanced diets
- Every day 24.7 47.7 44.1 34.0
** *
- 3-6x/wk
32.9 16.9 29.4 25.0
Habits of eating
fruits and
6.8 13.1 * 8.0 14.0 *
vegetables every
day
Habits of buying
food outside 91.8 78.5 * 84.8 73.1 *
home
In the intervention group, the endline survey found the consumption of green leafy
vegetables significantly increased to 46.2 percent from 33.3 percent.
The number of children who consumed mango and papaya as fruits increased
significantly in the intervention group during the endline survey to 23.1 percent from
13.7 percent. These fruits were the most consumed ones amongst children in the
intervention group. Usually, children in the intervention group consumed mango
during breakfast and papaya as snacks.
Percentage
Description Intervention Control
BL EL Sig. BL BL Sig.
Porridge, bread, rice,
noodle, vermicelli, 80.8 90.8 ** 85.3 87.0 *
corn, bose corn, biscuit
Potato, sweet potato,
12.3 1.5 ** 16.7 5.0 **
cassava, yam, taro
Green leafy vegetables 33.3 46.2 ** 54.9 38.0 **
Mango, papaya 13.7 23.1 ** 25.5 12.0 **
Meat, beef, pork,
mutton, chicken or 19.2 27.7 * 27.5 14.0 **
duck
Eggs 41.1 40.0 NS 47.1 35.0 **
Fresh or dried fish,
24.7 12.3 ** 25.5 38.0 **
oyster, seafoods
The number of students in the intervention group who drank more or less six glasses
of water every day significantly increased to 34.5 percent from 22.5 percent.
Significant improvement was also observed in the number of students who brought
boiled water to school at 55.4 percent from 31.5 percent.
Table 8. Access to Safe Drinking Water
Percentage
Description Intervention Control
BL EL Sig. BL BL Sig.
Drinking water
- ≥6 glasses/day 22.5 34.5 * 29.7 53.2 **
- <6 glasses/day 77.5 65.5 70.3 46.8
Drinking water at school
- Brought boiled
31.5 55.4 *** 33.3 63.8 ***
water from home
- Other sources 53.4 9.2 45.1 14.9
Drinking water at home
- Boiled water 61.6 78.5 *** 52.0 73.7 ***
- Other sources 38.4 9.2 48.0 19.2
Percentage
Description Intervention Control
BL EL Sig. BL EL Sig.
Diarrhea 11.0 9.2 NS 15.7 3.0 ***
Cough 27.4 16.9 NS 37.3 25.0 *
Common cold 35.6 7.7 *** 29.4 28.0 NS
Fever 32.9 13.8 ** 33.3 11.0 ***
Headache 16.4 7.7 NS 11.8 4.0 *
Ill 75.3 38.5 *** 71.6 51.0 **
Intervention Control
Percentage
Percentage
27.8
23.1 53.5
14.5 13.8 38.8 31.6
16.3
The prevalence of overweight increased to 12.3 percent from 8.3 percent while obesity
remains the same at 4.6 percent. Given the increasing number of overweight children,
it is important to consider making an adjustment to the composition and portion of
meals provided across four schools in Cargill intervention areas.
Nutritional Status
Groups
Stunting Wasting Overweight Obesity
Intervention 15.4 9.2 12.3 20
Group 11 8 10 4.6
References
Adan A. Cognitive performance and dehydration.Journal of the American College of
Nutrition. 2012. 31(2):71-78.
Janssen I and LeBlanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity
and fitness in school-aged children and youth. International Journal of Behavioral
Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2010, 7:40.
Peltzer K and Pengpid S. Oral and Hand Hygiene Behaviour and Risk Factors
amongIn-School Adolescents in Four Southeast Asian Countries. Int. J. Environ. Res.
Public Health 2014, 11, 2780-2792; doi:10.3390/ijerph110302780.
Picket W, Michaelson V, and Davison C. Beyond nutrition: hunger and its impact on
the health of youngCanadians. Int J Public Health. DOI 10.1007/s00038-015-0673-z.
Published online on 01 May 2015.
Sekiyama M, Roosita K, and Ohtsuka R. Physical growth and diets of school children:
Trends from 2001 to 2015 in rural West Java, Indonesia. American Journal of Human
Biology. 2017. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.23089 .
Shephard RJ, Allen C, Benade AJ, Davies CT, Di Prampero PE,Hedman R et al. The
maximum oxygen intake. An internationalreference standard of cardiorespiratory
fitness. Bull World HealthOrgan 1968; 38: 757–764.