Remotesensing 09 00257 v2

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 23

remote sensing

Article
Mapping Rice Fields in Urban Shanghai, Southeast
China, Using Sentinel-1A and Landsat 8 Datasets
Lamin R. Mansaray 1,2,3 , Weijiao Huang 4 , Dongdong Zhang 1,2 , Jingfeng Huang 1,2, * and Jun Li 5
1 Institute of Applied Remote Sensing and Information Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058,
China; [email protected] (L.R.M.); [email protected] (D.Z.)
2 Key Laboratory of Agricultural Remote Sensing and Information Systems, Zhejiang University,
Hangzhou 310058, China
3 Department of Agro-meteorology and Geo-informatics, Magbosi Land, Water and Environment Research
Centre (MLWERC), Sierra Leone Agricultural Research Institute (SLARI), Tower Hill, Freetown PMB 1313,
Sierra Leone
4 Department of Land Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; [email protected]
5 Shanghai Climate Center, Shanghai Meteorological Bureau, Shanghai 200031, China; [email protected]
* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-571-8898-2830

Academic Editors: Jan Dempewolf, Jyotheshwar Nagol, Min Feng, James Campbell and Prasad S. Thenkabail
Received: 25 November 2016; Accepted: 6 March 2017; Published: 10 March 2017

Abstract: Sentinel-1A and Landsat 8 images have been combined in this study to map rice fields in
urban Shanghai, southeast China, during the 2015 growing season. Rice grown in paddies in this area
is characterized by wide inter-field variability in addition to being fragmented by other land-uses.
Improving rice classification accuracy requires the use of multi-source and multi-temporal high
resolution data for operational purposes. In this regard, we first exploited the temporal backscatter of
rice fields and background land-cover types at the vertical transmitted and vertical received (VV)
and vertical transmitted and horizontal received (VH) polarizations of Sentinel-1A. We observed that
the temporal backscatter of rice increased sharply at the early stages of growth, as opposed to the
relatively uniform temporal backscatter of the other land-cover classes. However, the increase in rice
backscatter is more sustained at the VH polarization, and two-class separability measures further
indicated the superiority of VH over VV in discriminating rice fields. We have therefore combined the
temporal VH images of Sentinel-1A with the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the
modified normalized difference water index (MNDWI) derived from a single-date cloud-free Landsat
8 image. The integration of these optical indices with temporal backscatter eliminated all commission
errors in the Rice class and increased overall accuracy by 5.3%, demonstrating the complimentary
role of optical indices to microwave data in mapping rice fields in subtropical and urban landscapes
such as Shanghai.

Keywords: Sentinel-1A; Landsat 8 OLI; subtropics; urban agriculture; smallholder; paddy rice

1. Introduction
Urban and peri-urban agriculture (UPA) has gained much recognition as a major source of
livelihoods for inhabitants within cities and those along the rural–urban fringe, especially in developing
countries [1–3]. The increasing trends of rural–urban migration have triggered a population explosion
in cities. Migrated rural surplus labor is mostly unskilled. As a result, migrant populations mainly
engage in primary economic activities, prominent among which is farming [4].
The concept of UPA is fraught with definitional challenges as it involves a diverse range of
agricultural activities involving crops, livestock, and aquaculture at scales ranging from roof-top
gardens to larger cultivated open spaces [5]. Additionally, the boundary between the urban and

Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257; doi:10.3390/rs9030257 www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing


Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 2 of 23

peri-urban is along a land-use continuum which exhibits considerable heterogeneity [6]. Various
definitions of UPA have been put forward by scholars, and at the center of all these definitions
is the understanding that urban agriculture is farming practiced in inner city areas. On the other
hand, peri-urban agriculture is a residual form of farming at the fringes of growing cities, though a
commonly agreed spatial definition is missing [5]. The peri-urban is a transition zone between rural
and urban areas, which on the one hand is characterized by lower population density and inadequate
infrastructure compared to cities, and therefore not “urban”, and on the other hand a limited amount of
agricultural and natural land, and therefore not “rural” [7,8]. While urban agriculture primarily meets
food demands at household levels, peri-urban agriculture provides larger quantities with broader
distribution pathways, giving it a separate status in terms of food security planning [5]. Food security
is one major objective in the millennium development goals.
Urban agriculture is an important land-use and economic activity central to millions of people in
the world. It contributes significantly in meeting the nutritional requirements of urban dwellers and
hence, improves urban food security [9,10]. According to [11,12], urban agriculture supplies food to
about one-quarter of the world’s urban population. Apart from enhancing food security and urban
incomes, urban farming also contributes to flood control, land reclamation and city greening [13,14].
Hence, the economic and environmental significance of urban agriculture are enormous.
However, despite the enormous social, economic and environmental benefits provided by urban
agriculture, land is increasingly becoming scarce for the sustainability of this vital sector [3,15].
Residential and industrial land-uses are ever expanding into arable land at the fringes of urban
centers [4]. The unprecedented population increase in cities, especially in the developing world, means
more living space will be required for housing and other social infrastructure. This has led to a gradual
loss and fragmentation of agricultural land-use in urban and peri-urban areas [16,17], and one of the
most important agricultural crops affected by this socio-economic transformation is rice [18].
Rice is one of the most important food crops and accounts for 20% of the world’s calorie supply.
Rice is regarded the most important food for the poor as it serves as staple for about a billion people
subsisting on less than a dollar a day [19]. The rice crop is extensively grown in upland and lowland
ecologies found in the tropics, sub-tropics and temperate regions in Asia, Africa, Australia, Europe
and the Americas. Irrigation is often practiced in places where rain-fed agriculture is infeasible [20].
The continuous increase in the world’s human population has triggered an increase in the
demand for rice especially in developing countries, where rice is a major component of the daily
diet. In response to such food demands, several calls have been made over the years to increase rice
production [21]. However, such efforts have been hindered by the substantial shift in investment of
major rice producing countries from agriculture to manufacturing, and the continuous conversion of
agricultural land to residential and industry, mostly as a consequence of growing urbanization and
industrialization. Additionally, urban agricultural land-uses such as vegetable gardening, fruit farming
and aquaculture are increasingly encroaching into lands initially dedicated to rice farming. Globally,
there is an increasing decline in rice planted areas [22] and the intensification of this trend in urban and
peri-urban areas could have implications for global food security and food self-sufficiency. However,
the loss of paddy rice area has occurred in tandem with intensification of rice farming through the use
of agrochemicals to control pest and improve soil fertility, introduction of improved (short cycle and
high yielding) varieties and mechanized agriculture.
Monitoring rice cultivation is of great significance as such statistics could provide a means of
early warning signals of food scarcity, and hence, supporting food security policies [23]. Perhaps
the most widely and easily monitored variable of rice cultivation is acreage. Under the assumption
of ceteris paribus (all other things being equal), an increase in the rice planted area should translate
to an increase in rice productivity and food supply. Rice fields have also been noted to be major
sources of methane, a notable green house gas [24]. Monitoring paddy rice fields is therefore of much
relevance in understanding the global dynamics of greenhouse gas emissions, rising temperatures
and climate change. Additionally, one of the most potent impacts of climate change is dwindling
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 3 of 23

water resources [25]. Paddy rice is mostly flooded during its entire growth. Hence, data on the spatial
distribution of this crop are of vital importance in formulating informed environmental policies aimed
at the sustainable utilization and management of water resources [26].
Monitoring rice acreage with traditional ground-based surveys is time and labor consuming [27]
and also requires huge finance for resource mobilization especially when it is implemented at large
scales (regional to global) [28]. To ameliorate these cost limitations, satellite remote sensing has been
increasingly applied to provide data on rice planted areas at a variety of spatial scales with minimal
finance, time and human resources. The technology has been deemed efficient and is providing the
much needed data to support a range of agricultural, environmental and development policies [4].
Both optical and microwave remote sensing data have been exploited to map and monitor rice
growth [29]. However, as optical datasets are frequently contaminated by clouds in tropical areas,
microwave datasets are increasingly being preferred especially in rice area estimation due to their
all-weather imaging capability [30]. Microwave data are complementary to optical data, and in
cloud-prone tropical regions, they could be the preeminent data for monitoring paddy rice fields.
Mapping rice planted areas using optical satellite remote sensing data is primarily based on
the exploitation of the crop’s apparent reflectance characteristics in the visible near infrared (VNIR)
portions of the electromagnetic spectrum. It has been observed that after twelve weeks of growth, the
reflectance of paddy rice in the near infrared (NIR) reaches the highest value, while in the visible region
it reaches the lowest value [31]. The diagnostic spectral reflectance exhibited by paddy rice during
growth and their associated temporal vegetation indices have been mostly utilized to discriminate the
crop from other land-cover categories using optical remote sensing datasets such as Landsat 8 imagery
and the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) [29,32,33].
On the other hand, mapping paddy rice using microwave (radar) satellite data is based on
the backscatter response [34], which is largely a function of growth stage and conditions [35,36].
Three main components account for the observed temporal radar response produced by the interaction
of electromagnetic waves and the vegetation canopy; surface scattering, volume scattering, and surface
scattering attenuated by the vegetation volume [35,37]. Prior to sowing/planting, paddy rice fields are
flooded and a characteristic low backscatter is observed at this stage due to a dominance of smooth or
specular reflections from the water surface [36]. As the rice grows, a significant increase in backscatter
is recorded as a result of multiple scattering (double-bounce) effects involving the water surface and
the vertical elements of the crop [35]. It is this temporal backscatter change that has been exploited to
discriminate the rice crop from other surfaces using microwave data such as Sentinel-1 [38,39].
A number of studies have explored the comparative advantages of integrating optical and
microwave datasets for more efficient and accurate crop classifications. These research works have
employed classification algorithms ranging from the simple and traditional supervised classifiers of
maximum likelihood (MLC) to the more complex machine learning algorithms such as support vector
machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and classification and regression trees (CART). In this study,
we have explored both optical and microwave datasets to map paddy rice based on a simple decision
tree algorithm. We have combined five images from the new Sentinel-1A synthetic aperture radar
(SAR) with one Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) image to discriminate paddy rice in a
subtropical and urban landscape in Shanghai, southeast China, at the 2015 rice growing season.
The test site selected in this study is one of the most populated, industrialized and urbanized areas
in Southeast Asia. Even though rice cultivation is not a major economic activity in this area, being a
major staple food warrants its monitoring to provide data of relevance to urban food supply. To better
understand the relative contributions of economic sectors to greenhouse gas emissions in urbanized
and industrialized landscapes around the globe, it is extremely important to monitor urban rice
agriculture as a major source of methane. With the continuous increase in the population of Shanghai
mostly as a consequence of rural–urban migration, rice farming also provides an alternative source of
livelihood for migrants unabsorbed by the industrial labor market. Moreover, urban and industrial
areas such as Shanghai are faced with the challenges of meeting water demands for household and
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 4 of 23

industrial purposes. Rice in Shanghai is grown in paddies and as a result of insufficient rainfall,
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 4 of 22
irrigation is often practiced to meet growth requirements of this water-loving crop. In view of the
above,Init view
crop. is therefore
of theofabove,
essence,it to
is develop
thereforemethods that enhance
of essence, to develop effective
methodsmapping of rice agriculture
that enhance effective
in highly industrialized urban areas such as Shanghai, as data derived
mapping of rice agriculture in highly industrialized urban areas such as Shanghai, as data from such studies could have
derived
implications for social and environmental policies.
from such studies could have implications for social and environmental policies.
In addition
In addition to tothe
theaforementioned,
aforementioned, it is
it worth
is worthnoting
notingthatthat
mostmost
paddy rice mapping
paddy rice mappingprojects using
projects
satellite remote sensing data are conducted in rural and more agriculturally
using satellite remote sensing data are conducted in rural and more agriculturally intensive intensive landscapes,
in or proximal
landscapes, in to
or river basins,
proximal to inland valley inland
river basins, swamps, floodswamps,
valley plains and estuarine
flood plainsdeltas. Limited deltas.
and estuarine efforts
Limited efforts have been directed towards the mapping of urban agriculture where rice fieldsare
have been directed towards the mapping of urban agriculture where rice fields in particular, in
characterized
particular, areby fuzzy boundaries,
characterized by fuzzy small sizes, andsmall
boundaries, are also highly
sizes, and fragmented
are also highly by other land-uses.
fragmented by
Wide inter-field
other land-uses.variability due primarily
Wide inter-field to differences
variability due primarily in sowing or transplanting
to differences in sowing dates, crop variety,
or transplanting
soils and management practices have intensified the challenges of
dates, crop variety, soils and management practices have intensified the challenges of paddy paddy rice mapping in urban
rice
agricultural landscapes, and to ameliorate this, higher spatial resolution and
mapping in urban agricultural landscapes, and to ameliorate this, higher spatial resolution and multi- multi-source information
are required
source to adequately
information discriminate
are required urban rice
to adequately fields. urban rice fields.
discriminate
In subtropical regions like southeast China
In subtropical regions like southeast China where where cloudy weather
cloudy conditions
weather are prevalent
conditions during
are prevalent
the ricethe
during growing season,season,
rice growing a combination of optical
a combination and radar
of optical and imagery is highly
radar imagery desirable
is highly for a more
desirable for a
efficient mapping of rice fields. A number of studies have been conducted
more efficient mapping of rice fields. A number of studies have been conducted on rice mapping, but on rice mapping, but gaps
remain
gaps on theon
remain combined use of microwave
the combined and optical
use of microwave anddata for rice
optical dataarea
forestimation in fast urbanizing
rice area estimation in fast
landscapes. This study could be regarded as one of the inaugural
urbanizing landscapes. This study could be regarded as one of the inaugural studies on studies on the application of the
the
new Sentinel-1 constellation in paddy rice mapping. The combination of
application of the new Sentinel-1 constellation in paddy rice mapping. The combination of these new these new SAR data with
traditional
SAR data withLandsat opticalLandsat
traditional data in optical
mapping urban
data rice fields
in mapping which
urban riceare typically
fields whichatare subsistence
typically or at
smallholder commercialization scales, further stresses the significance and
subsistence or smallholder commercialization scales, further stresses the significance and potential potential contribution of
the current study
contribution of theincurrent
the emerging
study in field
the of agricultural
emerging fieldremote sensing. remote sensing.
of agricultural
2. Methodology
2. Methodology
2.1. Study Area
2.1. Study Area
The test site is located in Shanghai, southeast China. It covers the Shanghai central business
The test site is located in Shanghai, southeast China. It covers the Shanghai central business
district (CBD) and its immediate environs. The area under investigation is approximately 2437.7 km2 ,
district (CBD) and its immediate◦ environs. The area under investigation is approximately 2437.7 km2,
and is centered at longitude 121 50 0.900 E and latitude 31◦ 80 5.800 N. It is the most densely populated and
and is centered at longitude 121°5′0.9′′E and latitude 31°8′5.8′′N. It is the most densely populated and
most economically intensive part in the Shanghai metropolitan area. The location map of this area is
most economically intensive part in the Shanghai metropolitan area. The location map of this area is
given in Figure 1.
given in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Location
Location map
map of
of study
study area
area in
in Landsat
Landsat 88 OLI
OLI natural
natural color
color composite
composite image
image of
of RGB432;
RGB432; inset
inset
map on top right shows the approximate location of the study area in in China
China in
in red
red dot.
dot.

Shanghai is found in the subtropical zone and records annual mean temperatures and rainfall of
15.8°C and 1149.7 mm, respectively [40]. To support year-round agricultural practices, irrigation
schemes are often conducted to supplement insufficient rainfall and meet crop water requirements.
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 5 of 23

Shanghai is found in the subtropical zone and records annual mean temperatures and rainfall
of 15.8 ◦ C and 1149.7 mm, respectively [40]. To support year-round agricultural practices, irrigation
schemes are often conducted to supplement insufficient rainfall and meet crop water requirements.
Located in the western North Pacific at the mouth of the Yangtze River, Shanghai is a major
commercial hub in China and is home to one of the largest seaports in the world. Shanghai has
the highest population density in China, and with its vigorous economic growth, this municipality
accounts for about 4.5% of China’s gross domestic product (GDP) [40]. The population of Shanghai
continues to soar with increasing migration and arable land for UPA is rapidly becoming scarce.
Several years ago, southeast China including the Shanghai metropolis was one of the major
rice producing areas in China. With rapid socio-economic development in this area, more land
is required for housing, infrastructure and industry, and rice cultivation is increasingly becoming
prominent in northeast China [33]. Even though rice fields have been shifted to the peri-urban, apart
from competition from residential and industrial land-uses, they are also seriously contested by such
lucrative farming activities as aquaculture, horticulture, and other high income earning and shorter
duration crops. Rice fields are therefore becoming smaller and highly fragmented. Much of the paddy
rice in Shanghai is now cultivated by subsistence and smallholder commercial farmers. As rice is one
major food crop in southeast China, information on its spatial distribution is required for agricultural
and food security planning, and in land, water and environmental management.
A single-season rice cultivation system is practiced in Shanghai, which spans from late May to
late November. After rice harvest, most of the paddy fields are cultivated with winter wheat, forming
the most distinct crop rotation pattern in southeast China. Even though rice is cultivated in a single
season in this area, inter-field variability due to different planting dates is evident. Hence, to accurately
map rice fields in this area, multi-temporal data are imperative, and the use of multi-source datasets
could bring substantial improvements in overall classification accuracies.

2.2. Sentinel-1A Data


Launched in April 2014 by the European Space Agency (ESA) on a SOYUZ rocket from the Guiana
Space Center in French Guiana, Sentinel-1A is the first of a series of earth observation satellites for the
Copernicus Initiative. The Sentinel-1 mission is the European Radar Observatory for the joint initiative
on environment and security between the European Commission and ESA.
The Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) constellation carries two C-band instruments
(1A and 1B) operating at a center frequency of 5.4 GHz, sharing the same orbital plane. Sentinel-1A
is a sun-synchronous, near-polar circular orbit at a height of 693 km and an inclination angle of
98.18◦ . It offers a 12-day repeat cycle at the equator with 175 satellite orbits per cycle. With
Sentinel-1A and Sentinel-1B operating, a 6-day repeat cycle at the equator will be achieved [41].
These polar-orbiting satellites acquire images day and night regardless of weather conditions. They
continue and compliment C-band imaging missions of ESA’s Earth Resources Satellites (ERS 1 and
ERS 2), Environment Satellite (ENVISAT), and Canada’s RADARSAT-1 and RADARSAT-2 [41].
Sentinel-1 presents significant advancement over previous C-band missions as stated above, in
terms of spatial and temporal resolution, geographical coverage, reliability and data dissemination [41].
The mission seeks to benefit numerous services as in sea-ice monitoring and maritime surveillance, land
monitoring of forest, water, soils and agriculture, monitoring of land surface motions, and mapping to
support environment, crisis and natural disaster management [41].
Sentinel-1 operates in four exclusive acquisition modes; Stripmap (SM), Interferometric Wide
swath (IW), Extra-Wide swath (EW), and Wave mode (WV). Each mode can produce products at SAR
Level-0, Level-1 single look complex (SLC), Level-1 ground range detected (GRD) and Level-2 Ocean
(OCN). Level-1 SLC products have been focused and geo-referenced using satellite altitude and orbit
data, and are provided in zero-Doppler slant range geometry. Level-1 GRD products are detected,
multi-looked and projected to ground range using an Earth ellipsoid model, and phase information
is lost. The products have approximately square resolution and pixel spacing with reduced speckle
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 6 of 23

effects at the cost of reduced geometric resolution. GRD products can be in full, high and medium
resolution. Level-2 OCN products include Ocean Swell spectra (OSW), Ocean Wind Fields (OWI),
and Surface Radial Velocities (RVL). OSW provides an estimate of wind speed and direction per swell
spectrum. OWI gives a ground range gridded estimate of surface wind speed and direction at 10 m
above the surface. RVL is a ground range gridded difference between the measured Level-2 Doppler
grid and the level-1 calculated geometrical Doppler. Of these four acquisition modes of Sentinel-1A,
the IW mode is regarded as the primary or default operational mode over land, supporting agriculture,
forestry and other natural resource applications [41]. Hence, the IW mode is selected in this study to
map rice fields in urban Shanghai.
The IW mode combines a large swath (250 km) with a moderate geometric resolution (5 m by
20 m), and images in three sub-swaths using the Terrain Observation with Progressive Scans SAR
(TOPSAR). In addition to steering the beam in range as in SCANSAR, the TOPSAR technique also
steers the beam electronically from backward to forward in azimuth direction for each burst, thus,
avoiding scalloping and resulting in higher quality images [41]. Interferometry is maintained by
the sufficient overlap of the Doppler spectrum (azimuth domain) and the wave number spectrum
(elevation domain). TOPSAR ensures homogenous image quality throughout the swath [41].
In this study, we have acquired five Sentinel-1A GRD images in IW mode during the 2015
rice growing season in Shanghai. These images span from the flooding/transplanting stage to the
heading/milking stage of paddy rice, a period at which changes in temporal backscatter of the rice
crop are most diagnostic. The acquired images are all in dual polarization of vertical transmitted and
vertical received (VV), and vertical transmitted and horizontal received (VH) channels. They are in a
range and azimuth resolution of 5 m and 20 m, respectively [41]. All images from Sentinel satellite
constellations are freely available to consumers and can be downloaded at https://scihub.copernicus.
eu/dhus/#/home. Table 1 gives a summary of the characteristics of the 5 Sentinel-1A images used in
this study. More details on Sentinel-1 products can be found in [41].

Table 1. Characteristics of Sentinel-1A level 1 GRD IW products used in this study.

Date AT RON PD ST (GMT) Polarization Resolution


9 June 2015 Normal 105 Descending 21:49 VV VH High
8 July 2015 Normal 171 Ascending 09:54 VV VH High
1 August 2015 Normal 171 Ascending 09:54 VV VH High
25 August 2015 Normal 171 Ascending 09:54 VV VH High
18 September 2015 Normal 171 Ascending 09:54 VV VH High
AT, RON, PD and ST are acquisition type, relative orbit number, pass direction and sensing time, respectively.

2.3. Landsat 8 Data


Landsat provides the longest continuous archive of optical satellite data for land applications.
Since its first launch in 1972 with the Multi-spectral Scanner (MSS), Landsat data have significantly
improved over the years both in terms of spectral and spatial resolution. The launch of the Landsat 8
Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) in February 2013 in particular, has
brought new opportunities and a platform for continuity in optical remote sensing. Landsat data are
the most widely used in global land-cover mapping and are also freely available to the user community,
and can be downloaded at http://glovis.usgs.gov/ or http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/.
The Landsat 8 carries two instruments: the OLI sensor comprises refined heritage bands from
the Enhanced Thematic Mapper plus (ETM+) or Landsat 7, a new deep blue band for coastal/aerosol
studies, a shortwave infrared (SWIR) band for cirrus detection, and a quality assessment band.
The Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) provides two thermal bands. These sensors onboard Landsat 8,
have brought marked improvement in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and radiometry is quantized over
a 12-bit dynamic range. There are 4096 potential grey levels in Landsat 8 images compared with the
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 7 of 23

256 in previous 8-bit instruments (Landsat 4, 5 and 7). The improved SNR performance in Landsat 8
enables better land-cover classification, making it suitable for many environmental applications.
Due to persistent cloudy weather conditions in the study area during the rice growing season,
only a single cloud-free Landsat 8 image acquired on 3 August 2015 was used in this study. This image
is a standard Level-1 terrain corrected (LT1) product on path/row 118/038, projected to the Universal
Transverse Mercator (UTM) zone 51 N and World Geodetic System 84 (WGS84) datum.
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 7 of 22
2.4. Field Data
2.4. Field Data
Prior to image classification and accuracy assessment, a field survey of rice fields cultivated in
2015 wasPrior to imagefrom
conducted classification and accuracy
April to May assessment,
2016 to obtain traininga and
fieldvalidation
survey of datasets.
rice fieldsAn
cultivated
ancillaryin
field campaign was also conducted during rice maturity and harvest in November 2016. Riceancillary
2015 was conducted from April to May 2016 to obtain training and validation datasets. An fields
field campaign was also conducted during rice maturity and harvest in November
in 2015 were identified through rice stubble (residue), as some of the paddies remained uncultivated2016. Rice fields
in 2015 were identified through rice stubble (residue), as some of the paddies remained
after the previous rice harvest. Other 2015 rice fields, which were at the time of our survey cultivateduncultivated
after
with the previous
winter wheat orrice harvest.
other crops,Other 2015 ricethrough
were verified fields, which were at
sign boards andtheinterviews
time of our survey
with localcultivated
farmers.
with winter wheat or other crops, were verified
Figure 2 shows photos taken during the 2016 field campaigns.through sign boards and interviews with local
farmers. Figure 2 shows photos taken during the 2016 field campaigns.

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

Figure
Figure 2. 2.Spatial
Spatialdynamics
dynamicsofofrice
ricecultivation
cultivation in
in the
the study
study area:
area: (a) field
field showing
showing winter
winter wheat
wheat at
at maturity
maturity in in April
April 2016,
2016, but
but previously
previously cultivated
cultivated with
with rice
riceinin2015;
2015;(b)(b)field
fieldshowing
showinginter-field
inter-field
variability
variability ininrice
riceplanting
plantingtime
time in
in June 2016, with
June 2016, withthetheright
rightpart
partalready
already planted
planted andand
thethe
leftleft
partpart
prior
prior
to planting; (c) field showing a small rice plot (smallholder rice field) at maturity surroundedbyby
to planting; (c) field showing a small rice plot (smallholder rice field) at maturity surrounded
residential
residential andandanother
another agricultural
agriculturalland-use
land-useinin
November
November 2016;
2016;andand(d)(d)
field showing
field showing adjacent
adjacentrice
rice
plots in November 2016, one harvested and the other at
plots in November 2016, one harvested and the other at maturity. maturity.

Based on knowledge acquired during the 2016 field campaigns, we have proposed a simplified
land-cover classification scheme for the area under study with five broad classes: Rice refers to paddy
rice fields; Water includes rivers, lakes, streams and ponds; Built includes residential and industrial
estates; Tress include forests and plants with considerable height and density; and Others include
transitional areas, paved roads, bare land surfaces, grassland, other low biomass crops, and in the
final map could include any or a combination of the other classes due to misclassification. We have
adopted this broad classification scheme as the major focus of this study is rice field mapping. The
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 8 of 23

Based on knowledge acquired during the 2016 field campaigns, we have proposed a simplified
land-cover classification scheme for the area under study with five broad classes: Rice refers to
paddy rice fields; Water includes rivers, lakes, streams and ponds; Built includes residential and
industrial estates; Tress include forests and plants with considerable height and density; and Others
include transitional areas, paved roads, bare land surfaces, grassland, other low biomass crops, and
in the final map could include any or a combination of the other classes due to misclassification.
We have adopted this broad classification scheme as the major focus of this study is rice field mapping.
The broad land-cover classes of Water, Built, Trees and Others have also been taken into consideration
as their coexistence with rice fields could induce confusions and influence Rice classification accuracy.
A total of 150 points, each away from field boundaries, were randomly collected from paddy rice
fields using a portable Garmin Global Positioning System (GPS) device, and an average horizontal
accuracy of 4.0 m was recorded. From the 150 paddy points, 42 were randomly selected to guide
the onscreen digitization of training polygons for the extraction of backscatter coefficients from the
temporal Sentinel-1A images. Each of the digitized rice polygons had over 30 pixels. The remaining
108 points were reserved for accuracy assessment. As the other land-cover categories (Water, Built,
Trees and Others) are broad and more easily recognizable, 30 training polygons (each over 50 pixels) in
each class were directly digitized from high resolution and geo-referenced Google Earth images and
exported to Sentinel-1A data for the extraction of temporal backscatter profiles. Additionally, 42 points
from Water, and 50 points each from Built, Trees and Others, were randomly selected for the purpose
of map accuracy assessment.
Jensen [42] stated that without stratification, it is often difficult to find sufficient samples for
classes that occupy a small portion of the study area. Therefore, we have intentionally increased
the number of training and validation samples for the Rice class as it forms the major focus of our
study. In a highly heterogeneous landscape such as urban Shanghai, accuracy assessment of the rice
maps warrants a larger number of samples from the Rice class relative to other land-cover categories.
According to [42], the number of samples can also be adjusted based on the relative importance of
categories within the objectives of the project or the inherent variability within each category. It may
be useful to take fewer samples in categories that show little variability, such as water and forest, and
increase the sampling in the categories that are more variable, such as agricultural areas [42]. Hence,
though it accounted for the smallest percentage of the scene, we have collected more samples for the
Rice class, as it is more variable over time, in addition to being the major focus of our study.

2.5. Image Preprocessing


The five temporal images of Sentinel-1A SAR acquired for this study were automatically
preprocessed using the Sentinel Application Platform (SNAP) 2.0 software [43]. SNAP is a common
architecture for all Sentinel toolboxes, and is ideal for all earth observation processing and analysis.
The images were first calibrated to sigma naught (σ0 ) backscatter coefficients using Equation (1).
The calibrated images were then automatically terrain corrected using range Doppler terrain correction
(producing 10 m square pixel resolution images), reprojected to the Universal Transverse Mercator
(UTM) zone 51 N, and speckle filtered using a 7 × 7 gamma map filter with 3 looks [44,45]. Using the
9 June image as master, all the Sentinel-1A images were co-registered on-the-fly in SNAP based on
binomial interpolation, using 200 ground control points (GCPs).

10 alog10(b0 ) (1)

where b0 is the per pixel signal intensity value or digital number (DN).
The Landsat 8 OLI image used in this study was preprocessed using the Environment for
Visualizing Images (ENVI) 5.1 software (ITT Systems, ITT Exelis, Herndon, VA, USA). As optical
satellite images are frequently affected by atmospheric effects [46], we employed the darkest object
subtraction (DOS) method which has been found most suitable for removing atmospheric effects from
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 9 of 23

cloud-free images [46] as the one used herein. The atmospherically corrected Landsat 8 image was
subset to the areal extent of the test site. This image subset was geometrically corrected using 30 GCPs
located at major intersections or easily identifiable features across the study area, and a root mean
square error (RMSE) of less than 0.5 pixel (<15 m) was recorded. A 4-band spectral subset comprising
the green (0.53–0.59), red (0.64–0.67), NIR (0.85–0.88) and SWIR 1 (1.57–1.65) bands was then generated.
These 4 multispectral bands were selected for the derivation of optical indices that will be combined
with the temporal Sentinel-1A data for the land-cover mapping in this study.
The final preprocessing involved a PAN-sharpening of the 30 m Landsat OLI image (selected
4 bands) to the 10 m square pixel resolution of Sentinel-1A. PAN-sharpening involves the merging of a
panchromatic image (PAN) with a multispectral image (MSI) inorder to increase the spatial resolution
of the latter, while simultaneously preserving its spectral information [47]. In this study, both datasets
(Sentinel-1A as PAN and Landsat 8 as MSI) have been geo-referenced and projected to the same
cartographic plane (UTM 51 N, WGS 84). The Gram-Schmidt Spectral Sharpening method was used to
sharpen the multispectral Landsat data with the higher resolution Sentinel-1A data. Gram-Schmidt is
an effective multispectral image sharpening method as it uses the spectral response function of a given
sensor to estimate what the panchromatic data look like. It has been recommended for most remote
sensing applications [47,48] and is therefore, utilized in this study.

2.6. Image Classification


A decision tree classification algorithm is implemented in this study based on the spatial and
temporal distribution of backscatter coefficients obtained from Sentinel-1A data and optical indices
derived from the single Landsat image. A decision tree classifier is independent of data probability
distributions [23]. It employs tree-structured rules which recursively divide the initial input dataset
into increasingly homogeneous subsets based on well defined splitting criteria [49]. At each split or
node, the values of each explanatory variable are examined and a particular threshold of a single
variable that produces the largest reduction in a deviance measure is chosen to partition the data [50].
Decision tree classifiers are advantageous in that they are less sensitive to nonlinearities in the input
data than classification methods that require an assumption of Gaussian distributions [50,51].
As the Sentinel-1A data used in this study are in dual polarization of VV and VH, we have
attempted to propose the most optimal polarization for mapping the targeted land-cover types.
We have decided to use a single polarization in order to reduce data redundancy and dimensionality,
as Landsat 8 optical indices are also utilized. In [52], similar to using multiple or dual polarization
data, a corresponding increase in accuracy is expected when the inputs to the classification algorithm
consist of measurements acquired at different dates.
Two criteria were considered in the selection of the optimal polarization. The first criterion is
based on the temporal increase of paddy rice backscatter, whereas the second exploits a two-class
separability measure. The optimal polarization is assumed to be the one which exhibits the most
sustained increase in paddy rice backscatter, while at the same time producing the best results with
the two-class separability measure. In other words, a polarization has to satisfy both conditions to be
considered optimal or else both polarizations will be used as inputs in the decision tree classifier.
According to the concept of feature separability [53], two classes are said to be well separated
if the distance between their respective class means is larger than that of their standard deviations.
The separability criteria between classes a and b is measured by the Bahattacharrya distance [54] as:

|µ a − µb |
Sab = (2)
s a + sb

where µ and s are the mean and standard deviation of the features to be separated, respectively.
The Bahattachayrrya distance is theoretically sound as it is directly related to the upper bound of
classification error probabilities [23]. It measures the real values between 0 and 2, where 0 indicates
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 10 of 23

a complete overlap between two classes, and 2 indicates a complete separation between them [55].
The larger the separability values among class pairs, the better the final classification results [23,49].
The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the normalized difference water index
(NDWI) were the two optical indices generated from the PAN-sharpened (10 m) Landsat 8 image
for combination with the temporal Sentinel-1A data. NDVI has been widely applied in monitoring
various vegetation cover, and is frequently used as a proxy of plant growth and productivity, as the
amount of solar radiation reflected by the vegetation canopy is related to wavelength, chlorophyll,
leaf interior tissues and plant water content [56]. NDWI is as important to the monitoring of water
bodies as NDVI is to the monitoring of vegetation canopies. In this study, we have employed the
modified NDWI (MNDWI) proposed by [57] which cannot only enhance information about water and
restricting the one from vegetation and soil, but can also significantly distinguish built-up features
from water bodies. These optical indices have been derived using the following equations:

bnir − bred
NDV I = (3)
bnir + bred

where bnir is the near infrared band and bred is the red band.

bgreen − bswir
MNDW I = (4)
bgreen + bswir

where bgreen and bswir are the green and shortwave infrared bands, respectively.
Land-cover classification accuracies have been improved with the conjugative use of optical
and microwave datasets [39,43]. In the current study, it is proposed that the integration of the
aforementioned optical indices with temporal microwave data could provide additional information
that would improve overall classification accuracy. The 5 Sentinel-1A images from the optimal
polarization and the NDVI and MNDWI images were finally layer stacked via bilinear interpolation
to produce a 7-band dataset as follows: 9 June image (b1), 8 July Image (b2), 1 August image (b3),
25 August image (b4), 18 September image (b5), 3 August NDVI image (b6) and 3 August MNDWI
image (b7).
The collected training polygons as stated in Section 2.4 were used to extract backscatter profiles
of the targeted land-cover categories using the optimal polarization. Average backscatter values in
decibels (dB) were calculated for each training polygon in each class. Then the average temporal
backscatter profile was calculated for each land-cover class. Based on the temporal backscatter of the
investigated land-cover classes at the optimal polarization and the spatial distribution of NDVI and
MNDWI values, a decision rule mapping algorithm is proposed and validated in this study.

2.7. Mapping Algorithm


In our proposed algorithm, we have made an initial categorization of the Rice class into two
subclasses (A and B) so as to take into account the different planting dates which cause differences
in growth stages and hence temporal backscatter between rice fields. Such variations could trigger
omissions in the Rice class. In the final map however, the Rice subclasses have been merged into a
single Rice class. Our proposed mapping algorithm is described along the following paragraphs.
A hierarchical knowledge-based decision rule classier has been employed in this study. As stated
in [23,47,58], this knowledge can be heuristic, i.e., based on experience and reasoning. We have
developed the classification rules based on our expert knowledge of class signatures and data
characteristics using the per pixel information in each image, with its temporal behavior, and the
corresponding temporal backscatter coefficients (dynamic range, minimum and maximum) and the
single-date optical indices in each of the land-cover types. Dynamic and variable thresholds have been
employed to discriminate paddy rice fields from the other land-cover. All 7 images in the co-registered
layer stack described in Section 2.6 are used as input datasets in the decision tree.
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 11 of 23

For the identification of Rice, the observed dynamic range of backscatter values in this class is
from −23.5 to −13.5. As the Rice class showed the most dynamic backscatter range among the classes
investigated and being that there is wide inter-field variability in planting dates and hence growth
conditions, we have proposed two temporal thresholds for Rice discrimination. Firstly, all pixels less
than or equal to −19.0 dB and greater than or equal to −17.0 dB from b1 (9 June) to b2 (8 July) or from
b1 to b3 (1 August), or from b2 to b3, and with b6 (NDVI) greater than or equal to 0.3 but less than
0.5 are classified as Rice. Secondly, all pixels less than or equal to −18.0 dB and greater than or equal
to −16.0 dB from b1 to b2 or from b1 to b3, or from b2 to b3, with b6 greater than or equal to 0.3 but
less than 0.5 are classified as Rice. NDVI is derived from a 3 August image. From field information,
late planting of paddy rice in this area in 2015 was done within the first week of July. In view of the
observed paddy rice phenology in this area, at 3 August, even late planted rice is already 3−4 weeks
old, corresponding to a part of the vegetative stage, in which NDVI values are no less than 0.3 [59].
These rules are expected to reduce, if not eliminate confusions involving Rice.
For the identification of Water, the maximum backscatter value of water or flooded surfaces is
below −18.0 dB. Therefore, all pixels for which after the extraction of Rice were less than −18.0 dB
at any three consecutive dates of imaging (b1−b3, b2–b4, or b3–b5), and with a positive MNDWI
and negative NDVI are classified as Water. Between subsequent dates of SAR imaging, a backscatter
increase could be recorded over a water surface due to an increase in surface roughness caused
by moving elements such as winds or boats as is mostly common along rivers and coastlines.
The introduction of a consecutive three-date temporal backscatter below −18.0 dB could offset the
effect of isolated increases in backscatter between dates of SAR imaging. Additionally, the use of
optical indices could eliminate the influence of any spontaneous increase in temporal backscatter.
For the mapping of Built, all pixels greater than −13.0 dB at any three consecutive dates of
imaging (b1–b3, b2–b4, or b3–b5), and with a negative NDVI were classified into this category.
This class exhibited the highest temporal backscatter values due primarily to corner reflections from
buildings and other vertical objects [45]. As we have placed other low backscatter surfaces such
as asphalt pavements into the class “Others” and as the temporal backscatter profile of Built is far
removed from that of Water, the MNDWI image was not applied in the mapping of Built.
For the mapping of Trees, all pixels for which after the extraction of Built were greater than
−16.0 dB at three consecutive dates of imaging as stated above, and with b6 greater than or equal to
0.5 were put into this category. Trees exhibited the second highest backscatter, and as its temporal
backscatter profile is also far away from that of Water, there was no need to utilize the MNDWI.
Finally, all pixels which do not meet the classification criteria outlined above, were classified as
Others, a class which as earlier mentioned, contains roads, barren, grasslands and other low biomass
plants, and in the final land-cover map, could include misclassified pixels from Rice, Water, Built and
Trees. Results obtained from this algorithm were validated via accuracy tests.

2.8. Accuracy Assessment


As stated in Section 2.4, 108 Rice points obtained from the 2016 field survey, 42 Water points and
50 points from each of the other land-cover types, derived from geo-referenced and high resolution
Google Earth images, were used in a post-classification accuracy assessment. An error/confusion
matrix was generated, and from which the producer’s accuracy, user’s accuracy, Kappa (statistic) index
of agreement and overall classification accuracy of our mapping algorithm were calculated.
The methodological approach adopted in this study is illustrated in the flow chart below (Figure 3).
As stated in Section 2.4, 108 Rice points obtained from the 2016 field survey, 42 Water points and
50 points from each of the other land-cover types, derived from geo-referenced and high resolution
Google Earth images, were used in a post-classification accuracy assessment. An error/confusion
matrix was generated, and from which the producer’s accuracy, user’s accuracy, Kappa (statistic)
indexSens.
Remote of agreement
2017, 9, 257 and overall classification accuracy of our mapping algorithm were calculated.
12 of 23
The methodological approach adopted in this study is illustrated in the flow chart below (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Methodological workflow.


Figure 3. Methodological workflow.

3. Results
3. Results
3.1. Optimal Polarization Images
3.1. Optimal Polarization Images
In determining the optimal polarization based on the temporal increase in paddy rice backscatter,
In determining
backscatter profiles ofthe optimalpolygons
training polarization
werebased on the
critically temporalatincrease
examined both VV inand
paddy
VHrice backscatter,
polarizations.
backscatter profiles of training polygons were critically examined at both VV and VH
It is observed at these two polarizations that at the start of the growing season, out of the 42 paddy polarizations.
It istraining
rice observed at these two
polygons, polarizations
14 showed lowestthat at the start
backscatter of the
at the firstgrowing
availableseason,
image out of the 42 while
(9 June/b1), paddy
rice training polygons, 14 showed lowest backscatter at the first available image
the remaining 28 showed lowest backscatter at the second available image (8 July/b2). In any paddy (9 June/b1), while
the remaining 28 showed lowest backscatter at the second available image (8 July/b2).
rice field, lowest backscatter values are recorded at the flooding and planting stages. Hence, we first In any paddy
rice field,
made lowest backscatter
a temporal values
distinction of paddyarerice
recorded
fields at the flooding
based and planting
on the apparent time stages.
of lowestHence, we first
backscatter
as follows: Rice A as fields whose lowest backscatter at the start of the season were recorded by the
9 June image; Rice B as fields whose lowest backscatter at the start of the season were recorded by
the 8 July image. In effect, Rice A are fields planted before 9 June, and Rice B are those planted after
9 June. Tables 2 and 3 show the extracted average temporal radar backscatter coefficients and their
corresponding standard deviations at VH and VV polarizations for the two Rice subclasses and the
broad land-cover categories of Water, Built, Trees and Others.

Table 2. Temporal backscatter coefficients for all land-cover classes at VH polarization.

Rice A Rice B Water Built Trees Others


Image µ s µ s µ s µ s µ s µ s
9 June −20.2 1.0 −17.2 1.9 −22.3 3.1 −9.2 4.2 −14.4 0.6 −17.2 2.1
8 July −17.7 1.3 −19.7 1.0 −22.0 2.1 −9.0 4.3 −14.0 1.0 −17.1 2.2
1 August −16.3 0.7 −16.2 0.9 −22.1 2.4 −9.3 4.3 −13.9 1.0 −17.5 1.6
25 August −16.9 0.9 −16.4 0.8 −22.2 2.2 −9.4 4.3 −13.8 0.9 −17.7 2.2
18 September −17.7 1.0 −17.8 1.1 −22.1 2.4 −9.2 4.3 −14.1 0.6 −17.4 1.9
µ and s are the mean and standard deviation, respectively, of backscatter (dB) at corresponding class and date.
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 13 of 23

Table 3. Temporal backscatter coefficients for all land-cover classes at VV polarization.

Rice A Rice B Water Built Trees Others


Image µ s µ s µ s µ s µ s µ s
9 June −12.6 2.0 −9.8 2.4 −15.4 2.9 −0.9 3.6 −7.5 0.6 −10.7 3.7
8 July −8.3 1.5 −11.0 2.0 −14.4 2.6 −2.0 3.2 −7.0 1.0 −9.9 4.1
1 August −9.7 1.7 −9.3 1.7 −13.7 1.9 −2.5 3.2 −7.3 1.1 −10.4 3.5
25 August −10.9 1.5 −10.2 2.2 −15.3 2.0 −2.2 3.2 −7.0 0.8 −10.2 4.0
18 September −12.5 2.0 −13.4 1.8 −14.8 2.6 −2.3 3.2 −7.6 0.9 −10.4 3.9
µ and s are the mean and standard deviation, respectively, of backscatter (dB) at corresponding class and date.

Figure 4 shows the average temporal backscatter profiles of Rice at both VV and VH polarizations.
It can be observed from Figure 4 that the temporal backscatter at the VV channel is higher than that at
VH at all imaging dates, in agreement with results obtained in [38,45]. However, the VH polarization
indicates the most consistent temporal increase in paddy rice backscatter. The consistency is here
defined as the number of time points at which an increase in backscatter is recorded. For Rice A, there is
an increase in backscatter up to the third image date (1 August 2015) at VH polarization, as opposed to
a VV polarization in which the increase stopped at the second image date (8 July 2015). For Rice B, even
though the increase in backscatter saturates at the second image for both polarizations, the VH channel
shows a relatively shallow decline compared to the steep decline at VV. As stated in [38], the physical
basis for the more sustained increase in rice temporal backscatter at VH polarization is attributable
to the VH signal being less affected by changes in surface water and therefore could better reveal
rice growth conditions. Furthermore, Le Toan et al. [60] attributed this to the stronger attenuation of
vertical cylinders (leaves and stems) at the VV than at the VH channel. These backscatter dynamics
have also been observed in [23], and, hence, substantiate our results. We have therefore, supposed the
VH polarization to provide a better discrimination of Rice from other land-cover categories whose
temporal backscatter profiles are generally stable during the paddy rice growing season in the area
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 13 of 22
under investigation.

(a) (b)
Figure
Figure 4.
4. Temporal
Temporal backscatter
backscatter profiles
profilesof
ofRice
Ricesubclasses
subclassesatatboth
bothpolarizations:
polarizations:(a)(a)Rice
RiceA;A;
(b)(b)
Rice
Rice
B. Data points correspond to Sentinel-1A images of Shanghai acquired on 9 June, 8 July, 1
B. Data points correspond to Sentinel-1A images of Shanghai acquired on 9 June, 8 July, 1 August,August,
25 August and
25 August and 18
18 September
September in
in 2015,
2015, respectively.
respectively.

Results on the determination of the optimal polarization channel based on two-class signature
Results on the determination of the optimal polarization channel based on two-class signature
separability measures are given in Table 4. Results are computed using Equation (2) in Section 2.6.
separability measures are given in Table 4. Results are computed using Equation (2) in Section 2.6.
Table 4. Comparison of two-class separability results at VH and VV polarizations.

Class Pairs VH Polarization VV Polarization


Rice and Water* 1.1 1.0
Rice and Built 1.6 1.6
Rice and Trees* 1.9 1.0
Rice and Others* 0.4 0.1
Water and Built** 1.9 2.2
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 14 of 23

Table 4. Comparison of two-class separability results at VH and VV polarizations.

Class Pairs VH Polarization VV Polarization


Rice and Water * 1.1 1.0
Rice and Built 1.6 1.6
Rice and Trees * 1.9 1.0
Rice and Others * 0.4 0.1
Water and Built ** 1.9 2.2
Water and Trees * 2.3 2.1
Water and Others * 1.1 0.7
Built and Trees ** 0.9 1.3
Built and Others * 1.3 1.2
Trees and Others * 1.1 0.6
* Class pair in which VH has better separability than VV, and ** class pair in which VV separates better than VH.

From Table 4, the class pair “Rice and Others” is not linearly separable as the latter is a combination
of surface features (bare soils, asphalt pavements and grassland) which generally exhibit similar (low)
backscatter values especially at the start of the rice growing season. However, as our mapping strategy
is based on multi-temporal data, these classes can be separated based on the increase in temporal
backscatter of rice at the start of the growing season, as opposed to the relatively linear backscatter
profile of “Others” at periods corresponding to the rice growing season.
In general, a separability value below 0.8 is regarded not large enough to separate two classes.
Between 0.8 and 1.5, the quality of the separation between the two classes is regarded as average.
Values above 2.0 indicate almost complete separability between classes [53,54]. From Table 4, it can
be observed that with exception of the class pairs “Water and Built” and “Built and Trees”, the VH
polarization produces better inter-class signature separability.
Based on the most sustained increase in paddy rice backscatter at the VH polarization, and the
superiority of the VH over the VV channel in the two-class separability measure, we have, therefore,
proposed the VH polarization as the optimal polarization and with which the optical indices are
combined for the mapping of rice fields and the other land-cover categories in this study. It has also
been observed in [52] that at C-band, cross (VH) polarization produces better crop classification results
than the like (VV) polarization, and that the use of dual polarization does not further
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257
improve the
14 of 22
classification results. Figure 5 shows the temporal backscatter profiles of the two Rice subclasses
(Rice A andtheRice
classification
A) andresults. Figure
the other 5 shows
broad the temporal
land-cover backscatterat
categories profiles
the VHof the two Rice subclasses
polarization.
(Rice A and Rice A) and the other broad land-cover categories at the VH polarization.

Figure 5. Temporal backscatter


Figure 5. Temporal profiles
backscatter of of
profiles Rice
Ricesubclasses and
subclasses and thethe other
other land-cover
land-cover at VH polarization.
at VH polarization.
Data points correspond to Sentinel-1A images of Shanghai acquired on
Data points correspond to Sentinel-1A images of Shanghai acquired on 9 June, 8 July, 9 June, 8 July, 1 August, 25 1 August,
August and 18 September in 2015, respectively.
25 August and 18 September in 2015, respectively.
In Figure 5, it can be clearly seen that, apart from the two Rice subclasses, the other land-cover
classes show linear temporal backscatter profiles during the paddy rice growing season. Therefore,
based on the observed increase in the backscatter of paddy rice at the first two months of growth and
its steady decline thereafter relative to the almost stable temporal backscatter profiles of the other
land-cover classes, and the spatial distribution of single-date NDVI and MNDWI values, we have
presented results from two mapping algorithms; one obtained only from the temporal VH images of
Figure 5. Temporal backscatter profiles of Rice subclasses and the other land-cover at VH polarization.
RemoteData
Sens.points
2017, 9,correspond
257 to Sentinel-1A images of Shanghai acquired on 9 June, 8 July, 1 August, 25
15 of 23
August and 18 September in 2015, respectively.

In Figure
In Figure 5,
5, it
it can
can be
be clearly
clearly seen
seen that,
that, apart
apart from
from the
the two
two Rice
Rice subclasses,
subclasses, the the other
other land-cover
land-cover
classes show linear temporal backscatter profiles during the paddy rice growing
classes show linear temporal backscatter profiles during the paddy rice growing season. Therefore, season. Therefore,
based on
based on the
the observed
observed increase
increase in
in the
the backscatter
backscatter ofof paddy
paddy rice
rice at
at the
the first
first two
two months
months of of growth
growth and
and
its steady decline thereafter relative to the almost stable temporal backscatter profiles
its steady decline thereafter relative to the almost stable temporal backscatter profiles of the other of the other
land-cover classes,
land-cover classes, andand the
the spatial
spatial distribution
distribution ofof single-date
single-date NDVI
NDVI and and MNDWI
MNDWI values,values, wewe have
have
presented results from two mapping algorithms; one obtained only from the
presented results from two mapping algorithms; one obtained only from the temporal VH images oftemporal VH images of
Sentinel-1A and the other derived from the synergistic application of temporal
Sentinel-1A and the other derived from the synergistic application of temporal Sentinel-1A images Sentinel-1A images
and single-date
and single-date Landsat
Landsat indices.
indices. The
The latter
latter algorithm
algorithm (described
(described inin Section
Section 2.7)
2.7) is,
is, however,
however, proposed
proposed
in this study as it produced much better classification
in this study as it produced much better classification accuracy. accuracy.

3.2. Mapping Results from Sentinel-1A


3.2. Mapping Results from Sentinel-1A
Results from the use of only the temporal VH images of Sentinel-1A are presented in Figure 6.
Results from the use of only the temporal VH images of Sentinel-1A are presented in Figure 6.

Figure 6. Simplified land-cover map of study area derived only from VH images of Sentinel-1A.
Figure 6. Simplified land-cover map of study area derived only from VH images of Sentinel-1A.

In Figure 6, it can be observed that there are wide misclassifications especially with Rice, Water
and Trees. Some pixels within deep water surfaces have been classified as Rice. Even on land, certain
pixels have been misclassified as Rice, such as in lawns and asphalt pavements. These areas typically
show low microwave backscatter. As the prevalence of surface winds could increase the roughness and,
hence, the backscatter signals at a subsequent acquisition, some of these pixels could be misclassified
as Rice. Water pixels can also be found in dryland surfaces such as asphalt pavements and lawns.
Additionally, in a highly urbanized landscape such as Shanghai, it is very unlikely to find such a large
area covered by trees, as can be observed in Figure 6. The class “Trees” has virtually taken all the areas
that are likely to be occupied by the class “Others” (as defined in this study). The accuracy assessment
report for the land-cover map presented in Figure 6 is given in Table 5.
In Table 5, even though almost all validation points of Rice have been correctly classified, there
are some commission errors in this class. Much of the commission errors in Water are derived from the
misclassification of Rice. In addition, much of the omission errors in the class “Others” are derived
from the misclassification of Trees. Built shows a relatively good agreement with ground reference data.
Table 5. Error matrix of accuracy assessment of classification with Sentinel-1A VH images.

Classes Rice Water Built Trees Others Row Total


Rice 107 3 2 1 6 119
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257
Water 1 38 2 1 7 49 16 of 23
Built 0 0 44 2 7 53
Trees 0 0 2 38 18 58
Table 5. Error matrix of accuracy assessment of classification with Sentinel-1A VH images.
Others 0 1 0 8 12 21
CT Classes 108 Rice 42
Water 50
Built Trees50 Others 50 Row Total 300
PA (%) Rice 99.1 107 90.53 88.0
2 1 76.0 6 24.0 119
UA (%) Water 89.9 1 77.638 83.0
2 1 65.5 7 57.1 49
BuiltClassification
Overall 0 0
Accuracy: 79.7%44 2 Kappa7 Statistic:53
0.73
Trees 0 0 2 38 18 58
CT, PA and UA are column total, producer’s accuracy and user’s accuracy, respectively.
Others 0 1 0 8 12 21
In Table 5,CT
even though108almost all 42validation50points of Rice
50 have been
50 correctly 300classified, there
PA (%) 99.1 90.5 88.0 76.0 24.0
are some commission errors in this class. Much of the commission errors in Water are derived from
UA (%) 89.9 77.6 83.0 65.5 57.1
the misclassification of Rice.
Overall In addition,
Classification much79.7%
Accuracy: of the omission errors inStatistic:
Kappa the class0.73
“Others” are derived
from the misclassification of Trees. Built shows a relatively good agreement with ground reference
CT, PA and UA are column total, producer’s accuracy and user’s accuracy, respectively.
data.

3.3. Mapping
3.3. MappingResults
Resultsfrom
fromSentinel-1A
Sentinel-1A and
and Landsat
Landsat 88
Resultsfrom
Results from the
the proposed
proposed mapping
mapping algorithm,
algorithm, which
which utilizes
utilizes both
both the
the temporal
temporal VH
VH images
images of
of
Sentinel-1A and
Sentinel-1A and the
the single-date
single-date NDVI
NDVI and
and MNDWI
MNDWI fromfrom Landsat
Landsat 88 are
are presented
presented in
in Figure
Figure 7.
7.

Simplifiedland-cover
Figure7.7.Simplified
Figure land-covermap
mapof
ofstudy
studyarea
areaderived
derivedfrom
from Sentinel-1A
Sentinel-1A VH
VH and
and Landsat
Landsat 88 OLI.
OLI.

In Figure 7, the wide classification errors observed in Figure 6 have been reduced significantly
with the introduction of single-date optical indices (NDVI and MNDWI). The map shows greater class
homogeneity as much of the misclassified, island or mixed pixels have been eliminated. Rice and
Water are more clearly delineated. Rice pixels can now only be seen inland, and in places where rice
cultivation is most likely. The area covered by Trees has significantly reduced as a consequence of
the increase in the area covered by the class “Others”. Additionally, some of the pixels (bare surfaces,
asphalt pavements, grassland, etc.) initially misclassified as Water have now been categorized into the
class ”Others”. The Built category still maintains its relatively good agreement with reference data.
The class accuracy assessment report of Figure 7 is given in Table 6.
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 17 of 23

Table 6. Error matrix of accuracy assessment of classification with Sentinel-1A VH and Landsat 8 OLI.

Classes Rice Water Built Trees Others Row Total


Rice 104 0 0 0 0 104
Water 2 39 1 0 0 42
Built 0 0 43 2 7 52
Trees 0 0 0 31 5 36
Others 2 3 6 17 38 66
CT 108 42 50 50 50 300
PA (%) 96.3 92.9 86.0 62.0 76.0
UA (%) 100 92.9 82.7 86.1 57.6
Overall Classification Accuracy: 85.0% Kappa Statistic: 0.81
CT, PA and UA are column total, producer’s accuracy and user’s accuracy, respectively.

In Table 6, the commission errors previously recorded in Rice have all been eliminated, with
however, a few omission errors. There is a slight decrease in the accuracy of Built, but that of Water
increases. The improvement in the UA of Trees corresponds to the improvement in the PA of Others.
In Figures 6 and 7, it can be clearly seen that, excluding the apparent commission errors in the
Rice class in Figure 6, there seems a perfect agreement on the spatial distribution of rice fields between
the two maps. Paddy rice cultivation is mostly concentrated in the northeastern part of the study area,
which mainly includes the urban Shanghai districts of Jiading and Baoshan.

4. Discussion
Sentinel-1A offers a new opportunity for environmental monitoring at finer spatio-temporal
scales. These data have already been tested in rice and land-cover monitoring [38,39,43]. However,
specific applications of these data in mapping subsistence or smallholder commercial rice agriculture
typical in urban landscapes are yet to be undertaken. In this study, we have combined these new SAR
data with the Landsat 8 OLI data to map rice fields in urban Shanghai, southeast China, during the
2015 growing season.
Even though a single-season rice cultivation system is practiced in the study area, there is still
wide inter-field variability in the growth of rice crops, due mainly to differences in planting dates
and varieties. As temporal backscatter coefficients of rice are largely a function of rice growth stage
and conditions, inter-field differences could affect the performance of rice mapping algorithms in
which temporal backscatter change is used as the main classification feature. In a single-season rice
cultivation system, planting dates could vary up to eight weeks between adjacent paddy rice fields [24].
Additionally, differences in variety and management practices could lead to marked differences in
growth conditions, and, hence, temporal backscatter. Therefore, using the temporal backscatter change
as a classification feature, a major source of uncertainty could arise due to different radar response
patterns between fields. This calls for the application of a high temporal frequency of SAR observations
that would capture even subtle differences in backscatter values between rice fields.
In this study, we have employed five temporal images of Sentinel-1A, covering a part of the rice
growing season (planting to heading) in which changes in backscatter values are most pronounced.
From an analysis of the temporal backscatter of paddy rice, we confirmed the variations in planting
dates based on the time of lowest backscatter at the start of the growing season. The time of lowest
backscatter for paddy rice at the start of the growing season is at flooding and planting. We have
therefore, initially categorized the Rice class into two: Rice A, are those fields in which the lowest
backscatter at the start of the season is recorded by the 9 June image; Rice B, are those in which the
lowest backscatter at the start of the season is recorded by the 8 July image. Out of the 42 Rice training
samples, none recorded lowest backscatter in the 1 August image, implying that, in 2015, planting was
conducted from early June to early July for most, if not all, the rice fields in the study area.
It is observed in this study that the temporal backscatter profiles at the VV polarization are higher
for all land-cover classes, which is in agreement with results obtained in [45]. However, the VH
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 18 of 23

polarization exhibited the most sustained increase in backscatter of Rice A, increasing sharply from
flooding/planting to apparent tillering and booting, and decreasing slightly at heading. With the VV
channel, the temporal increase in backscatter saturates at the second available image for both Rice
subclasses (A and B). For Rice B, even though the increase in backscatter saturates at the second image
for both polarizations, the VH channel shows a relatively shallow decline compared to the steep decline
at VV polarization. Using two-class separability measures reported in [51], the VH polarization is
also found to have an overall better performance in discriminating the investigated land-cover classes.
Hence, given its more sustained increase in temporal backscatter with rice and its better inter-class
signature separability, the VH polarization was regarded optimal for our study, and whose temporal
images were used in subsequent analysis.
As would be expected, Water showed the lowest temporal backscatter, a feature attributable to
the smooth or specular reflections from the water surface [23]. Built exhibited the highest temporal
backscatter profile, which is largely ascribed to corner reflections from buildings and other vertical
objects [49]. Trees also showed a high temporal backscatter profile second only to Built. Excluding the
Rice subclasses, the class “Others”, which comprises bare soils, paved roads, herbaceous cover, grass
and other low biomass crops, showed a temporal backscatter profile higher only than that of Water.
This is due to the significant influence of roads in the class “Others”. Even in optical images, asphalt
materials could show low reflectance. From a visual inspection of the individual pixels of highways
and airport runways, we observed a low temporal backscatter closer to the maximum backscatter
value recorded at the flooding stage of rice. The temporal backscatter profile of the class ”Others” is
approximately mid-way between the peaks and troughs of rice temporal backscatter.
As stated earlier, the first mapping results presented in this study are only based on five VH
images from Sentinel-1A. We have employed as a classification feature, the temporal increase in rice
backscatter during the first two months of growth, and its steady decline thereafter relative to the
nearly uniform temporal backscatter profiles of the other land-cover classes. The resultant land-cover
map from this approach shows serious misclassifications of Rice, Water, Trees and Others. Even though
almost all validation Rice pixels were correctly classified, there were some commission errors in this
class. Several Water pixels have been misclassified as Rice. This is one major source of uncertainty in
paddy rice mapping algorithms solely based on the temporal increase in backscatter. It is important
to note that an increase in surface roughness, which could be induced by moving objects such as
wind or boats, could increase the backscatter value of a given pixel between SAR acquisitions [28].
If this backscatter increase is within the observed dynamic range of paddy rice backscatter and also
fall within the lower and upper limit thresholds, such a pixel will be categorized as Rice. Several
confusions also exist between Trees and Others, and between Water and Others. Figure 6 shows
a relatively large area covered by Trees, a condition that is very unlikely in this area. Much of the
pixels of the class “Others”, especially those of herbaceous plants, have been misclassified as Trees.
Several pixels of the class “Others” have equally been misclassified as Water due to significantly low
backscatter profiles of areas covered by grass and asphalts pavements. In order to eliminate some of
these confusions, we have combined the temporal VH images with the NDVI and MNDWI images.
The introduction of the aforementioned optical indices into our mapping algorithm brought
a significant reduction in inter-class confusions as evident in the respective producer’s and user’s
accuracies. In the Rice class, these optical indices eliminated all the commission errors derived from
omissions in the other classes. Our study area is not only located along the coast but is also home
to large rivers including the famous Huangpu River. As boats and other marine vessels frequently
sail along these waterways, the backscatter of a given pixel could increase between dates of imaging.
Furthermore, this area is prone to subtropical monsoon winds, which occur during the rice growing
season. Thus, sporadic or spontaneous increases in surface roughness and, hence, SAR backscatter are
most likely, which could lead to misclassification of Water pixels as Rice. Water and Built typically
have negative NDVI values, and therefore, the introduction of this optical index removed all Water and
Built pixels misclassified as Rice on the basis of a temporal increase in backscatter. In Table 5, half of
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 19 of 23

the commission errors in the Rice class are accounted for by the class “Others”. With the introduction
of the condition, 0.5 > NDVI ≥ 0.3, all commission errors in the Rice class derived from omissions in
“Trees and Others” were eliminated. It is assumed that at 3 August (date of optical indices), rice plants
in the study area would have acquired enough surface area for NDVI to be greater than or equal to 0.3,
but less than 0.5. The use of the condition, NDVI ≥ 0.5, significantly reduced the commission errors in
Trees, thereby increasing the PA of Others, and hence, an overall increase in the classification accuracy
of Trees and Others. It can be observed that most of the areas initially misclassified as Trees in Figure 6
have been classified as “Others” in Figure 7. This is quite agreeable with ground reference data as the
class “Others” occupies a larger portion in the study area.
As the major focus of this study is urban rice mapping, it is extremely important to note the
comparative advantages of the two mapping algorithms in discriminating rice fields. With the
incorporation of optical indices, there is a slight decrease in the PA of Rice but a substantial increase in
its UA. The slight decrease in the former is attributable to the omission errors associated with the use
of NDVI. We have proposed that a pixel is classified as Rice when it meets the temporal backscatter
change criterion, while having NDVI values ≥ 0.3 but < 0.5. The three additional pixels eliminated
from the Rice class with the introduction of NDVI is likely due to the fact that, even within a plot of
rice, growth is not uniform, and pixels which may fall below a critical threshold could be removed
from the Rice class. With the sole use of the temporal VH images, only one Rice validation point was
eliminated. However, results obtained from the sole use of VH images are largely misleading due
to the commission errors in the Rice class, and of course also, the commission errors in Water, Built
and Trees, which are as a result of the large omission errors in the class “Others”. With the integration
of the temporal VH images of Sentinel-1A with the single-date Landsat 8 OLI’s NDVI and MNDWI
images, there is a substantial increase in the class accuracy of Rice and the reduction of commission
and omission errors in the other classes brought a slight increase in overall classification accuracy.

5. Conclusions
Globally, little research effort has been directed towards urban agricultural mapping, where
land dedicated to rice cultivation in particular, is increasingly becoming smaller and fragmented by
other land-uses. With rice production forming an integral part in meeting global food demands, it is
important to not only monitor rice cultivation at large scales, but also those at relatively smaller scales
such as in urban areas. Furthermore, rice cultivation is at the center stage of global environmental
debates involving greenhouse gas emissions and water resource allocation. However, the contribution
of urban rice agriculture to the above environmental issues is largely ignored due to limited urban
agricultural information. In an attempt to fill some of the knowledge gaps in agricultural mapping in
urban landscapes, this study is conducted to test the potential of integrating the new Sentinel-1A SAR
data with Landsat 8 optical data for urban rice mapping.
In this study, we have noted the VH polarization of Sentinel-1A to be the optimal polarization
for rice field mapping as it exhibited the most sustained increase in the temporal backscatter of rice,
relative to the nearly uniform temporal backscatter profiles of the other land-cover classes. Using a
two-class separability measure, the VH polarization showed better inter-class discrimination ability,
and was thus combined with NDVI and MNDWI images in our proposed rice mapping algorithm.
With the introduction of NDVI and MNDWI, overall classification accuracy increased from
79.7% to 85.0%, and the Kappa statistic from 0.73 to 0.81. The slight increase in overall classification
accuracy (5.3%) has demonstrated the added value of limited optical data to the more available radar
data in cloud-prone tropics and subtropics for land-cover mapping. We strongly suppose that with
more temporal optical data, the potential of SAR data in paddy rice mapping will be fully realized.
The increase in Rice user’s accuracy (reduction in commission errors) with the addition of these two
optical indices confirms the operational applicability of integrating the new Sentinel-1A data with
optical data for rice mapping in subtropical and highly heterogeneous landscapes.
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 20 of 23

It can be observed in Figure 7 that the rice parcels are located in the peripheral areas of the
study site. This indicates the gradual shift of rice cultivation to the urban fringe and peri-urban as
a consequence of urban expansion and industrialization. Additionally, the intensification of urban
agricultural land-uses such as vegetable gardening, fruit farming and aquaculture has reduced the
amount of land allocated to rice cultivation. Apart from providing better rents than rice, perishable
goods such as vegetables, fruits and fish require closer proximity to urban markets and consumers.
Hence, rice fields are increasingly becoming smaller and fragmented by other agricultural land-uses
in urban areas such as Shanghai. However, rice being a major staple food means its cultivation is
still central in the attainment of global food security and in urban areas could not only meet food
demands at household levels but also provide an alternative employment for unskilled or urban
surplus labor. Even though our study has only mapped rice fields at a single time point (2015),
our results could be instrumental in updating previous records while providing a basis for revealing
the spatio-temporal dynamics of rice cultivation in urban Shanghai and its potential impacts on food
availability, greenhouse gas emissions, water resource utilization and land-use management. This study
could be regarded as one of, if not the first, to test the operational applicability of integrating the new
Sentinel-1A data with Landsat 8 data for mapping smallholder rice fields in an urban landscape at a
district scale, providing details of individual rice field boundaries. Moreover, our study, having shown
the VH polarization to increase sharply after planting and decrease steadily at heading, demonstrates
the potential of Sentinel-1A in monitoring other rice biophysical parameters that show similar temporal
behaviors such as above ground biomass and leaf area index. Hence, this scientific contribution would
be of much interest to the agricultural remote sensing community.

Acknowledgments: This study was conducted with funds from the Agricultural Project for Scientific and
Technological Research (APSTR) of Shanghai, China (Grant No. 2011-2-11), and the National Key Research
and Development Plan of China (Grant No. 2016FYD0300601) which also covered the cost of open access
publication. We thank Dr. Lei Liu of the School of Earth Science and Resources of Chang’an University, China,
for his help in downloading the Sentinel-1A data while pursuing his post-doctoral research at the University of
Alberta, Canada. Our sincere thanks also, to students in the Key Laboratory of Agricultural Remote Sensing and
Information Systems of Zhejiang University, for their assistance during field campaigns, and to the anonymous
reviewers whose advice and comments were instrumental in shaping the contents and structure of this article.
Author Contributions: Lamin R. Mansaray and Jingfeng Huang conceived and designed the study, processed
and analyzed the data, and wrote the article; Weijiao Huang assisted in data analysis; Dongdong Zhang led the
field campaigns; and Jun Li provided relevant reference information and assisted in the preparation of the article.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
1. Foeken, D.; Owuor, S.O. “To Subsidise My Income”: Urban Farming in an East African Town; Brill: Leiden,
The Netherlands, 2006; p. 223.
2. Krikser, T.; Piorr, A.; Berges, R.; Opitz, I. Urban Agriculture Oriented towards Self-Supply, Social and
Commercial Purpose: A Typology. Land 2016, 5, 28. [CrossRef]
3. Forkuor, G.; Cofie, O. Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in Freetown, Sierra Leone and its effects
on urban and peri-urban agriculture–a remote sensing approach. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 32, 1017–1037.
[CrossRef]
4. Mansaray, L.R.; Huang, J.; Kamara, A.A. Mapping deforestation and urban expansion in Freetown, Sierra
Leone, from pre-to post-war economic recovery. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 1–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Thebo, A.L.; Drechsel, P.; Lambin, E.F. Global assessment of urban and peri-urban agriculture: Irrigated and
rainfed croplands. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 114002. [CrossRef]
6. Schneider, A.; Woodcock, C.E. Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth
in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information. Urban Stud.
2008, 45, 659–692. [CrossRef]
7. Allen, A. Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: Perspectives on an emerging
field. Environ. Urban. 2003, 15, 135–148. [CrossRef]
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 21 of 23

8. Piorr, A. (Ed.) Peri-urbanisation in Europe: Towards European policies to sustain urban-rural futures;
synthesis report; PLUREL (sixth framework programme). In Forest & Landscape; University of Copenhagen:
Copenhagen, Denmark, 2011.
9. Argenti, O. Food for the Cities: Food supply and Distribution Policies to Reduce Urban Food Insecurity. A Briefing
Guide for Mayors, City Executives and Urban Planners in Developing Countries and Countries in Transition;
Food into Cities Collection DT/43-00E; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome,
Italy, 2000.
10. Van Veenhuizen, R. Cities Farming for the Future: Urban Agriculture for Green and Productive Cities; International
Development Research Centre (IDRC): Cavite, Philippines, 2006.
11. Smit, J.; Nasr, J.; Ratta, A. Urban Agriculture: Food, Jobs and Sustainable Cities; United Nations Development
Programme: New York, NY, USA, 1996; pp. 35–37.
12. Pickett, S.T.A.; Cadenasso, M.L.; Grove, J.M.; Nilon, C.H.; Pouyat, R.V.; Zipperer, W.C.; Costanza, R. Urban
ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan
areas. In Urban Ecology; Springer: Millbrook, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 99–122.
13. Altieri, M.A.; Companioni, N.; Cañizares, K.; Murphy, C.; Rosset, P.; Bourque, M.; Nicholls, C.I. The greening
of the “barrios”: Urban agriculture for food security in Cuba. Agric. Hum. Values 1999, 16, 131–140. [CrossRef]
14. Drechsel, P.; Keraita, B. (Eds.) Irrigated Urban Vegetable Production in Ghana: Characteristics, Benefits and Risk
Mitigation; International Water Management Institute (IWMI): Battaramulla, Sri Lanka, 2014.
15. Appeaning Addo, K. Urban and peri-urban agriculture in developing countries studied using remote sensing
and in situ methods. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 497–513. [CrossRef]
16. Sullivan, W.C.; Lovell, S.T. Improving the visual quality of commercial development at the rural–urban
fringe. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2006, 77, 152–166. [CrossRef]
17. Kontgis, C.; Schneider, A.; Fox, J.; Saksena, S.; Spencer, J.H.; Castrence, M. Monitoring peri-urbanization in
the greater Ho Chi Minh City metropolitan area. Appl.Geogr. 2014, 53, 377–388. [CrossRef]
18. Noda, K.; Maki, M.; Miyaoka, K.; Homma, K.; Shirakawa, H.; Oki, K. A decision-making model for rice
paddy cropping in an urbanizing area of the Lao PDR. Paddy Water Environ. 2015, 13, 487–493. [CrossRef]
19. Dawe, D.; Pandey, S.; Nelson, A. Emerging trends and spatial patterns of rice production. In Rice in the Global
Economy: Strategic Research and Policy Issues for Food Security; International Rice Research Institute (IRRI):
Los Baños, Philippines, 2010.
20. Portmann, F.T.; Siebert, S.; Bauer, C.; Döll, P. Global Dataset of Monthly Growing Areas of 26 Irrigated Crops;
Version 1.0; University Institute of Physical Geography: Frankfurt (Main), Germany, 2008.
21. Alexandratos, N.; Bruinsma, J. World Agriculture towards 2030/2050, the 2012 Revision; (No. 12-03, p. 4), ESA
Working Paper; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2012.
22. Bouvet, A.; Le Toan, T.; Lam-Dao, N. Monitoring of the rice cropping system in the Mekong Delta using
ENVISAT/ASAR dual polarization data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2009, 47, 517–526. [CrossRef]
23. Choudhury, I.; Chakraborty, M. SAR signature investigation of rice crop using RADARSAT data. Int. J.
Remote Sens. 2006, 27, 519–534. [CrossRef]
24. Le Toan, T.; Ribbes, F.; Wang, L.F.; Floury, N.; Ding, K.H.; Kong, J.A.; Fujita, M.; Kurosu, T. Rice crop mapping
and monitoring using ERS-1 data based on experiment and modeling results. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
1997, 35, 41–56. [CrossRef]
25. Fathelrahman, E.; Davies, A.; Davies, S.; Pritchett, J. Assessing climate change impacts on water resources
and Colorado agriculture using an equilibrium displacement mathematical programming model. Water
2014, 6, 1745–1770. [CrossRef]
26. Bouman, B.A.M.; Humphreys, E.; Tuong, T.P.; Barker, R. Rice and water. Adv. Agron. 2007, 92, 187–237.
27. Shen, S.; Yang, S.; Li, B.; Tan, B.; Li, Z.; Le Toan, T. A scheme for regional rice yield estimation using ENVISAT
ASAR data. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 2009, 52, 1183–1194. [CrossRef]
28. Bouvet, A.; Le Toan, T. Use of ENVISAT/ASAR wide-swath data for timely rice fields mapping in the
Mekong River Delta. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115, 1090–1101. [CrossRef]
29. Wang, J.; Xiao, X.; Qin, Y.; Dong, J.; Zhang, G.; Kou, W.; Jin, C.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Y. Mapping paddy
rice planting area in wheat-rice double-cropped areas through integration of Landsat-8 OLI, MODIS, and
PALSAR images. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10088. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Koppe, W.; Gnyp, M.L.; Hütt, C.; Yao, Y.; Miao, Y.; Chen, X.; Bareth, G. Rice monitoring with multi-temporal
and dual-polarimetric TerraSAR-X data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs.Geoinf. 2013, 21, 568–576. [CrossRef]
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 22 of 23

31. Chang, K.W.; Shen, Y.; Lo, J.C. Predicting rice yield using canopy reflectance measured at booting stage.
Agron. J. 2005, 97, 872–878. [CrossRef]
32. Dao, P.D.; Liou, Y.A. Object-based flood mapping and affected rice field estimation with Landsat 8 OLI and
MODIS data. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 5077–5097. [CrossRef]
33. Jin, C.; Xiao, X.; Dong, J.; Qin, Y.; Wang, Z. Mapping paddy rice distribution using multi-temporal Landsat
imagery in the Sanjiang Plain, northeast China. Front. Earth Sci. 2016, 10, 49–62. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34. Liew, S.C.; Kam, S.P.; Tuong, T.P.; Chen, P.; Minh, V.Q.; Lim, H. Application of multitemporal ERS-2 synthetic
aperture radar in delineating rice cropping systems in the Mekong River Delta, Vietnam. IEEE Trans. Geosci.
Remote Sens. 1998, 36, 1412–1420. [CrossRef]
35. Inoue, Y.; Kurosu, T.; Maeno, H.; Uratsuka, S.; Kozu, T.; Dabrowska-Zielinska, K.; Qi, J. Season-long daily
measurements of multifrequency (Ka, Ku, X, C, and L) and full-polarization backscatter signatures over
paddy rice field and their relationship with biological variables. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 81, 194–204.
[CrossRef]
36. Kuenzer, C.; Knauer, K. Remote sensing of rice crop areas. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2013, 34, 2101–2139. [CrossRef]
37. Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Wu, J.; Qi, J.; Salas, W.A. Mapping paddy rice with multitemporal ALOS/PALSAR
imagery in southeast China. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2009, 30, 6301–6315. [CrossRef]
38. Nguyen, D.B.; Gruber, A.; Wagner, W. Mapping rice extent and cropping scheme in the Mekong Delta using
Sentinel-1A data. Remote Sens. Lett. 2016, 7, 1209–1218. [CrossRef]
39. Torbick, N.; Chowdhury, D.; Salas, W.; Qi, J. Monitoring rice agriculture across Myanmar using time series
Sentinel-1 assisted by Landsat 8 and PALSAR 2. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 119. [CrossRef]
40. Shi, J.; Cui, L. Characteristics of high impact weather and meteorological disaster in Shanghai, China.
Nat. Hazard. 2012, 60, 951–969. [CrossRef]
41. Sentinel-1 User Handbook, Sentinel-1 Team, GMES-S1OP-EOPG-TN-13-0001. Available online:
https://sentinel.esa.int/ (accessed on 1 September 2013).
42. Jensen, J.R. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, 4th ed.; Prentice Hall:
Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2016.
43. Shao, Z.; Fu, H.; Fu, P.; Yin, L. Mapping Urban Impervious Surface by Fusing Optical and SAR Data at the
Decision Level. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 945. [CrossRef]
44. Chen, J.; Lin, H.; Pei, Z. Application of ENVISAT ASAR data in mapping rice crop growth in Southern China.
IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2007, 4, 431–435. [CrossRef]
45. Wu, F.; Wang, C.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, B.; Tang, Y. Rice crop monitoring in South China with RADARSAT-2
quad-polarization SAR data. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2011, 8, 196–200. [CrossRef]
46. Hadjimitsis, D.G.; Clayton, C.; Retalis, A. On the darkest pixel atmospheric correction algorithm: A revised
procedure applied over satellite remotely sensed images intended for environmental applications. Proc. SPIE
2003, 5239, 465.
47. Maurer, T. How to pan-sharpen images using the Gram-Schmidt pan-sharpen method-a recipe. Int. Arch.
Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2013, XL-1/W1, 239–244. [CrossRef]
48. Jawak, S.D.; Luis, A.J. A comprehensive evaluation of PAN-sharpening algorithms coupled with resampling
methods for image synthesis of very high resolution remotely sensed satellite data. Adv. Remote Sens. 2013,
2, 332–344. [CrossRef]
49. Wang, D.; Lin, H.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, Q. Application of multi-temporal ENVISAT ASAR data to
agricultural area mapping in the Pearl River Delta. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2010, 31, 1555–1572. [CrossRef]
50. Rogan, J.; Miller, J.; Stow, D.; Franklin, J.; Levien, L.; Fischer, C. Land-cover change monitoring with
classification trees using Landsat TM and ancillary data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2003, 69, 793–804.
[CrossRef]
51. Townsend, P.A. Mapping seasonal flooding in forested wetlands using multi-temporal Radarsat SAR.
Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2001, 67, 857–864.
52. Skriver, H.; Mattia, F.; Satalino, G.; Balenzano, A.; Pauwels, V.R.; Verhoest, N.E.; Davidson, M. Crop
classification using short-revisit multitemporal SAR data. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2011,
4, 423–431. [CrossRef]
53. Shi, J.; Dozier, J.; Rott, H. Snow mapping in alpine regions with synthetic aperture radar. IEEE Trans. Geosci.
Remote Sens. 1994, 32, 152–158.
Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 257 23 of 23

54. Richards, J.A.; Woodgate, P.W.; Skidmore, A.K. An explanation of enhanced radar backscattering from
flooded forests. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1987, 8, 1093–1100. [CrossRef]
55. Lin, H.; Chen, J.; Pei, Z.; Zhang, S.; Hu, X. Monitoring sugarcane growth using ENVISAT ASAR data.
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2009, 47, 2572–2580. [CrossRef]
56. Dorigo, W.; De Jeu, R.; Chung, D.; Parinussa, R.; Liu, Y.; Wagner, W.; Fernandez-Prieto, D. Evaluating global
trends (1988–2010) in homogenized remotely sensed surface soil moisture. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2012, 39,
L18405. [CrossRef]
57. Xu, H. Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely
sensed imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2006, 27, 3025–3033. [CrossRef]
58. Kontgis, C.; Schneider, A.; Ozdogan, M. Mapping rice paddy extent and intensification in the Vietnamese
Mekong River Delta with dense time stacks of Landsat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 169, 255–269.
[CrossRef]
59. Wang, J.; Huang, J.; Zhang, K.; Li, X.; She, B.; Wei, C.; Gao, J.; Song, X. Rice fields mapping in fragmented
area using multi-temporal HJ-1A/B CCD images. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 3467–3488. [CrossRef]
60. Le Toan, T.; Laur, H.; Mougin, E.; Lopes, A. Multitemporal and dual-polarization observations of agricultural
vegetation covers by X-band SAR images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1989, 27, 709–718. [CrossRef]

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).