Essential Mathematics For Economic Analysis Students Manual 5Th Ed Edition Carvajal Full Chapter
Essential Mathematics For Economic Analysis Students Manual 5Th Ed Edition Carvajal Full Chapter
Essential Mathematics For Economic Analysis Students Manual 5Th Ed Edition Carvajal Full Chapter
Knut Sydsæter
Peter Hammond
Andrés Carvajal
Arne Strøm
any shorter answers provided in the main test. There are a few cases where only part of the answer
is set out in detail, because the rest follows the same pattern.
We would appreciate suggestions for improvements from our readers, as well as help in weeding
out inaccuracies and errors.
Contents
2 Algebra 2
2.3 Rules of algebra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.4 Fractions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.5 Fractional powers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.6 Inequalities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.8 Summation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.11 Double sums . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Review exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3 Solving Equations 8
3.1 Solving equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.2 Equations and their parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.3 Quadratic equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.4 Nonlinear equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.5 Using implication arrows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.6 Two linear equations in two unknowns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Review exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
i
4.10 Logarithmic functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Review exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5 Properties of Functions 17
5.3 Inverse functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5.4 Graphs of equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5.5 Distance in the plane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
5.6 General functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Review exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
6 Differentiation 18
6.2 Tangents and derivatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
6.5 A dash of limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
6.7 Sums, products and quotients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
6.8 The chain rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
6.10 Exponential functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
6.11 Logarithmic functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Review exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
7 Derivatives in Use 23
7.1 Implicit differentiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
7.2 Economic examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
7.3 Differentiating the inverse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
7.4 Linear approximations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
7.5 Polynomial approximations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
7.6 Taylor’s formula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
7.7 Elasticities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
7.8 Continuity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
7.9 More on limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
7.10 The intermediate value theorem and Newton’s method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
7.12 L’Hôpital’s rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Review exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
8 Single-variable Optimization 29
8.2 Simple tests for extreme points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
8.3 Economic examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
8.4 The extreme value theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
8.5 Further economic examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
8.6 Local extreme points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
8.7 Inflection points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Review exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
9 Integration 34
9.1 Indefinite integrals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
9.2 Area and definite integrals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
ii
9.3 Properties of indefinite integrals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
9.4 Economic applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
9.5 Integration by parts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
9.6 Integration by substitution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
9.7 Infinite intervals of integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
9.8 A glimpse at differential equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
9.9 Separable and linear differential equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Review exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
13 Multivariable Optimization 54
13.2 Two variables: sufficient conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
13.3 Local extreme points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
13.4 Linear models with quadratic objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
13.5 The Extreme Value Theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
13.6 The general case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
13.7 Comparative statics and the Envelope Theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Review exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
iii
14 Constrained Optimization 63
14.1 The Lagrange Multiplier method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
14.2 Interpreting the Lagrange Multiplier . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
14.3 Multiple solution candidates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
14.4 Why the Lagrange method works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
14.5 Sufficient conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
14.6 Additional variables and constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
14.7 Comparative statics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
14.8 Nonlinear programming: a simple case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
14.9 Multiple inequality constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
14.10Nonnegativity constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Review exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
17 Linear Programming 89
17.1 A graphical approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
17.2 Introduction to Duality Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
17.3 The Duality Theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
17.4 A general economic interpretation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
17.5 Complementary slackness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
Review exercises . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
iv
1 Essentials of Logic and Set Theory
Review exercises for Chapter 1
3. Consider the Venn diagram for three sets depicted in Fig. SM1.R.3. Let nk denote the number
of students in the set marked (k), for k = 1, 2, . . . , 8. Suppose the sets A, B, and C refer to
those who study English, French, and Spanish, respectively. Since 10 students take all three
languages, n7 = 10. There are 15 who take French and Spanish, so 15 = n2 + n7 , and thus
n2 = 5. Furthermore, 32 = n3 + n7 , so n3 = 22. Also, 110 = n1 + n7 , so n1 = 100. The rest of
the information implies that 52 = n2 + n3 + n6 + n7 , so n6 = 52 − 5 − 22 − 10 = 15. Moreover,
220 = n1 + n2 + n5 + n7 , so n5 = 220 − 100 − 5 − 10 = 105. Finally, 780 = n1 + n3 + n4 + n7 ,
so n4 = 780 − 100 − 22 − 10 = 648. The answers are therefore:
(a) n1 = 100,
(b) n3 + n4 = 648 + 22 = 670,
(c) 1000 − 7i=1 ni = 1000 − 905 = 95.
P
E F
(5)
(1)
(4)
(7)
(2)
(3)
(6)
(8)
S
Figure SM1.R.3
5. For (a) and (b) see the solutions in the book. For (c), note that when n = 1, the inequality is
obviously correct.2 As the induction hypothesis when n equals the arbitrary natural number k,
suppose that (1 + x)k ≥ 1 + kx. Because 1 + x ≥ 0, we then have
where the last inequality holds because k > 0. Thus, the induction hypothesis holds for
n = k + 1. Therefore, by induction, Bernoulli’s inequality is true for all natural numbers n.
1
In the terminology of Section 6.3, function f (x) = x3 is strictly increasing. See Fig. 4.3.7 and Exercise 6.3.3.
2
And for n = 2, it is correct by part (b).
1
2 Algebra
2.3 Rules of algebra
4. (a) (2t−1)(t2 −2t+1) = 2t(t2 −2t+1)−(t2 −2t+1) = 2t3 −4t2 +2t−t2 +2t−1 = 2t3 −5t2 +4t−1.
(b) (a + 1)2 + (a − 1)2 − 2(a + 1)(a − 1) = (a2 + 2a + 1) + (a2 − 2a + 1) − 2(a2 − 1) = 4.3
(c) (x + y + z)2 = (x + y + z)(x + y + z) = x(x + y + z) + y(x + y + z) + z(x + y + z) =
(x2 + xy + xz) + (yx + y 2 + yz) + (zx + zy + z 2 ) = x2 + y 2 + z 2 + 2xy + 2xz + 2yz.
(d) Put a = x + y + z and b = x − y − z. Then
2.4 Fractions
1 1 x+2 x−2 x+2−x+2 4
5. (a) − = − = = 2 .
x−2 x+2 (x − 2)(x + 2) (x + 2)(x − 2) (x − 2)(x + 2) x −4
(b) Since 4x + 2 = 2(2x + 1) and 4x2 − 1 = (2x + 1)(2x − 1), the lowest common denominator,
LCD, is 2(2x + 1)(2x − 1). Then,
1
a 1 − 2a
2− = 2 − (4a − 2) = 4 − 4a = 4(1 − a).
0.25
2
1 1 1 1
− − · x2 y 2
x2 y 2 x2 y 2 y 2 − x2
(e) The expression equals = = 2 .
1 1 y + x2
1 1
+ + · x 2y2
x2 y 2 x2 y 2
(f) To clear the fractions within both the numerator and denominator, multiply both by xy
to get
a(y − x) y−x
=
a(y + x) y+x
−2 −2
1 1 5 4 1 1 1 1
8. (a) − = − = , so − = = 202 = 400.
4 5 20 20 20 4 5 20
n n·n n2 n(n − 1) − n2 n
(b) n − 1 =n− 1
=n− = =− .
1− n 1− n ·n n − 1 n − 1 n − 1
1 1 1 1 1 u
(c) Let u = xp−q . Then p−q
+ q−p
= + = + = 1.
1+x 1+x 1 + u 1 + 1/u 1+u 1+u
(d) Using x2 − 1 = (x + 1)(x − 1), one has
1 1
+ (x2 − 1)
x − 1 x2 − 1 (x + 1) + 1 x+2
= 2 − 1) − 2(x − 1)
= ,
2 x(x (x − 1)[x(x + 1) − 2]
x− (x2 − 1)
x+1
which reduces to
x+2 x+2 1
2
= = .
(x − 1)(x + x − 2) (x − 1)[(x + 2)(x − 1)] (x − 1)2
(e) Since
1 1 x2 − (x + h)2 −2xh − h2
− = = ,
(x + h)2 x2 x2 (x + h)2 x2 (x + h)2
it follows that
1 1
2
− 2
(x + h) x −2x − h
= 2 .
h x (x + h)2
10x2
(f) Multiplying both numerator and denominator by x2 −1 = (x+1)(x−1) yields ,
5x(x − 1)
2x
which reduces to .
x−1
3
(b) Correct because ap−q = ap /aq .
(c) Correct because a−p = 1/ap .
(d) 51/x = 1/5x = 5−x if and only if 1/x = −x or −x2 = 1, so there is no real x that satisfies
the equation.
(e) Put u = ax and v = ay , which reduces the equation to uv = u + v, or 0 = uv − u − v =
(u − 1)(v − 1) − 1. This is true only for special values of u and v and so for special values
of x and y. In particular, the equation is false when x = y = 1.
√ √
(f) Putting u = x and v = y reduces the equation to 2u · 2v = 2uv , which holds if and
only if uv = u + v, as in (e) above.
2.6 Inequalities
3. (a) This inequality has the same solutions as
3x + 1 3x + 1 − 2(2x + 4) −x − 7
− 2 > 0, or > 0, or > 0.
2x + 4 2x + 4 2x + 4
A sign diagram reveals that the inequality is satisfied for −7 < x < −2. A serious error
is to multiply the inequality by 2x + 4, without checking the sign of 2x + 4. If 2x + 4 < 0,
mulitiplying by this number will reverse the inequality sign.4
(b) The inequality is equivalent to 120/n ≤ 0.75 = 3/4, or (480 − 3n)/4n ≤ 0. A sign
diagram reveals that the inequality is satisfied for n < 0 and for n ≥ 160.5
(c) This is easy: g(g − 2) ≤ 0 and so 0 ≤ g ≤ 2.
(p − 2) + 3 p+1
(d) Note that p2 − 4p + 4 = (p − 2)2 , so the inequality reduces to 2
= ≥ 0.
(p − 2) (p − 2)2
The fraction makes no sense if p = 2. The conclusion that p ≥ −1 and p 6= 2 follows.
(e) The inequality is equivalent to
−n − 2 −n − 2 − 2n − 8 −3n − 10 10
− 2 > 0 ⇐⇒ > 0 ⇐⇒ > 0 ⇐⇒ −4 < n < −
n+4 n+4 n+4 3
6. (a) It is easy to see by means of a sign diagram that x(x + 3) < 0 precisely when x lies in
the open interval (−3, 0). Therefore we have ⇒ , but not ⇐: for example, if x = 10,
then x(x + 3) = 130.
(b) x2 < 9 ⇐⇒ −3 < x < 3, so x2 < 9 ⇒ x < 3. If x = −5, for instance, we have x < 3
but x2 > 9, hence we cannot have ⇐ here.
(c) If x > 0, then x2 > 0, but x2 > 0 also when x < 0. So, we have ⇐ but not ⇒.
(d) As y 2 ≥ 0 for any real number y, we have that x > 0 whenever x > y 2 . But x = 1 > 0
does not imply that x > y 2 for y ≥ 1. That is, we have ⇒ but not ⇐ .
4
It could be instructive to test the inequality for some values of x. For example, for x = 0 it is not true. What
about x = −5?
5
Note that for n = 0 the inequality makes no sense. For n = 160, we have equality.
4
√ √ √
9. Note that for any x ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0, x − 2 xy + y = ( x − y)2 ≥ 0, which implies that
1 √
(x + y) ≥ xy. (∗)
2
Note also that the inequality is strict unless x = y.
To show that mA ≥ mG , simply let x = a and y = b, so that
1 √
mA = (a + b) ≥ ab = mG ,
2
with strict inequality whenever a 6= b.
To show that mG ≥ mH , use x = 1/a and y = 1/b, so that, from (∗),
r
1 1 1 1 1
+ ≥ · ≥ 0.
2 a b a b
2.8 Summation
3. (a)–(d): In each case, look at the last term in the sum and replace n by k to get an expression
for the k th term. Call it sk . Then in (a), (b), and (d) the sum is nk=1 sk , and in (c) we have
P
Pn
k=0 sk .
(e) The coefficients are the powers 3n for n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, so the general term is 3n xn .
(f)–(g) See the answers in the Solutions Section of the book.
(h) This is trickier: one has to see that each term is 198 larger than the previous term.6
Pn 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Pn 2
7. (a) Valid: k=1 ck = c · 1 + c · 2 + · · · + c · n = c(1 + 2 + · · · + n ) = c k=1 k .
(b) Wrong, even for n = 2: the left-hand side is (a1 + a2 )2 = a21 + 2a1 a2 + a22 , but the
right-hand side is a21 + a22 , which is different unless a1 a2 = 0.
(c) Valid: both sides equal b1 + b2 + · · · + bN .
(d) Valid: both sides equal 51 + 52 + 53 + 54 + 55 .
(e) Valid: both sides equal a20,j + · · · + a2n−1,j .
(f) Wrong, even for n = 2: the left-hand side is a1 + a2 /2, but the right-hand side is
(1/k)(a1 + a2 ).
6
This problem is related to the story about Gauss in Section 2.9.
5
2.11 Double sums
1. (a) See the solution in the book.
4
2 X
rs 2 rs 2
X
(b) Note first that = 0 when s = 0. So reduces to
r+s r+s
s=0 r=2
2
" 2 2 2 # 2 2 2 2 2 2
X 2s 3s 4s 2 3 4 4 6 8
+ + = + + + + +
2+s 3+s 4+s 3 4 5 4 5 6
s=1
m X
X 2 m
X m
X m
X
ij = (i + i2 ) = i+ i2 = 21 m(m + 1) + 61 m(m + 1)(2m + 1)
i=1 j=1 i=1 i=1 i=1
1
= 6 m(m + 1)[3 + (2m + 1)] = 16 m(m + 1)(2m + 4) = 13 m(m + 1)(m + 2).
To prove (∗), note that because arj − ā is independent of the summation index s, it is a
common factor when we sum over s, so m
P Pm
s=1 (arj − ā)(asj − ā) = (arj − ā) s=1 (asj − ā) for
each r. Next, summing over r gives
m X m
"m #" m #
X X X
(arj − ā)(asj − ā) = (arj − ā) (asj − ā) , (∗∗)
r=1 s=1 r=1 s=1
Pm
because s=1 (arj − ā) is a common factor when we sum over r. Using the properties of sums
and the definition of āj , we have
m
X m
X m
X
(arj − ā) = arj − ā = māj − mā = m(āj − ā).
r=1 r=1 r=1
Pm
Similarly, replacing r with s as the index of summation, one also has s=1 (asj − ā) =
m(āj − ā). Substituting these values into (∗∗) then confirms (∗).
6
Review exercises for Chapter 2
5. (a) (2x)4 = 24 x4 = 16x4 .
1 1
(b) 2−1 − 4−1 = 2 − 4 = 41 , so (2−1 − 4−1 )−1 = 4.
(c) Cancel the common factor 4x2 yz 2 .
(d) Here −(−ab3 )−3 = −(−1)−3 a−3 b−9 = a−3 b−9 ,
so [−(−ab3 )−3 (a6 b6 )2 ]3 = [a−3 b−9 a12 b12 ]3 = [a9 b3 ]3 = a27 b9 .
a5 · a3 · a−2 a6
(e) = = a3 .
a−3 · a6 a3
3 −3
x 3 8 −3
x 2
(f) · −2 = · 8x = (x5 )−3 = x−15 .
2 x 8
10. Parts (a), (b), (d), (e), and (f) are straightforward; their solutions appear in the book. For
the other parts:
√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
(c) − 3 3 − 6 = −3 + 3 6 = −3 + 3 3 2 = −3 + 3 2.
(g) (1 + x + x2 + x3 )(1 − x) = (1 + x + x2 + x3 ) − (1 + x + x2 + x3 )x = 1 − x4 .
(h) (1 + x)4 = (1 + x)2 (1 + x)2 = (1 + 2x + x2 )(1 + 2x + x2 ), and so on.
12. Parts (a) and (b) are easy, so we focus on the others:
7
C
h3 h2 s
s P
h1
A s B
Figure SM2.R.25
29. (a) Using the trick that led to Eq. (2.9.4) in the book,
Summing vertically term by term, noting that there are 100 terms, gives
3 Solving Equations
3.1 Solving equations
3. (a) We note first that x = −3 and x = −4 both make the equation absurd. Multiplying the
equation by the common denominator (x+3)(x+4) yields (x−3)(x+4) = (x+3)(x−4),
i.e. x2 + x − 12 = x2 − x − 12, and thus x = 0.
(b) Multiplying by the common denominator (x − 3)(x + 3) yields 3(x + 3) − 2(x − 3) = 9,
from which we get x = −6.
(c) Multiplying by the common denominator 15x, assuming that x 6= 0, yields 18x2 − 75 =
10x2 − 15x + 8x2 , from which we get x = 5.
8
(d) Expanding all the parentheses gives
p 3 1 p 1 p 1
− − + − + =− .
4 8 4 12 3 3 3
Multiplying by the common denominator 24 gives the equation 6p − 9 − 6 + 2p − 8 + 8p =
−8, whose solution is p = 15/16.
9
apply the formula to obtain
√ √ q√ √ √
−( 3 − 2) ± ( 3 − 2)2 − 4 · 1 · (− 6)
r=
q 2·1
√ √ √ √
1
= − 3+ 2± 3−2 6+2+4 6
2
√ √ √
q
1
= − 3+ 2± 3+2 6+2
2
√ √ q√ √
1 2
= − 3 + 2 ± ( 3 + 2)
2
1 √ √ √ √
= − 3 + 2 ± ( 3 + 2) ,
2
√ √ √ √
so the solutions are r = 2 2 2 = 2 and r = − 21 2 3 = − 3.
1
10
3.5 Using implication arrows
3. (a) If
√ √
x−4= x + 5 − 9, (i)
then squaring each side gives
√
x − 4 = ( x + 5 − 9)2 . (ii)
√
Expanding the square on the right-hand side of (ii) gives x − 4 = x + 5 − 18 x + 5 + 81,
√ √
which reduces to 18 x + 5 = 90 or x + 5 = 5, implying that x + 5 = 25 and so x = 20.
This hows that if x is a solution of (i), then x = 20. No other value of x can satisfy (i).
But if we check this solution, we find that with x = 20 the left-hand side of (i) becomes
√ √
16 = 4, and the right-hand side becomes 25 − 9 = 5 − 9 = −4. This means that
equation (i) actually has no solutions at all.8
y √
y =9− x+5
5
√
y= x−4
x
5 10 15 20 25
-5 √
y= x + 5− 9
Figure SM3.5.3
(b) If x is a solution of
√ √
x−4=9− x + 5, (iii)
then just as in part (a) we find that x must be a solution of
√
x − 4 = (9 − x + 5)2 . (iv)
√ √
Now, (9 − x + 5)2 = ( x + 5 − 9)2 , so equation (iv) is equivalent to equation (ii) in
part (a). This means that (iv) has exactly one solution, namely x = 20. Inserting this
value of x into equation (iii), we find that x = 20 is a solution of (iii).
A geometric explanation of the results can be given with reference to Fig. SM3.5.3. We see
that the two solid curves in the figure have no point in common, that is, the expressions
√ √
x − 4 and x + 5 − 9 are not equal for any value of x.9 This explains why the equation
√
in (a) has no solution. The dashed curve y = 9 − x + 5, on the other hand, intersects
√
y = x + 5 for x = 20 (and only there), and this corresponds to the solution in part (b).10
8
But note that 42 = (−4)2 , i.e. the square of the left-hand side equals the square of the right-hand side. That is
how the spurious
√ solution √ x = 20 managed to sneak in.
9
In fact, x − 4 − ( x + 5 − 9) increases with x, so there is no point of intersection farther to the right, either.
10
In part (a) it was necessary to check the result, because the transition from (i) to (ii) is only an implication,
not an equivalence. Similarly, it was necessary to check the result in part (b), since the transition from (iii) to (iv)
also is only an implication — at least, it is not clear that it is an equivalence. (Afterwards, it turned out to be an
equivalence, but we could not know that until we had solved the equation.)
11
3.6 Two linear equations in two unknowns
4. (a) If the two numbers are x and y, then x + y = 52 and x − y = 26. Adding the two
equations gives 2x = 78, so x = 39, and then y = 52 − 39 = 13.
(b) Let the cost of one table be $x and the cost of one chair $y. Then 5x + 20y = 1800 and
2x + 3y = 420. Solving this system yields x = 120, y = 60.
(c) Let x and y be the number of units produced of B and P, respectively. This gives the
equations x = 23 y and 200x + 300y = 180 000. Inserting the expression for x from the
first equation into the second equation gives 300y + 300y = 180 000, which yields the
solution y = 300 and then x = 450. Thus, 450 units of quality A and 300 units of quality
B should be produced.
(d) Suppose that the person invested $x at 5% and $y at 7.2%. Then x + y = 10 000 and
0.05x + 0.072y = 676. The solution is x = 2000 and y = 8000.
4. (a) Multiply each side of the equation by 5K 1/2 to obtain 15L1/3 = K 1/2 . Squaring each
side gives K = 225L2/3 .
(b) Raise each side to the power 1/t to obtain 1 + r/100 = 21/t , and so r = 100(21/t − 1).
(c) abx0b−1 = p, so x0b−1 = p/ab. Now raise each side to the power 1/(b − 1).
(d) Raise each side to the power −ρ to get (1 − λ)a−ρ + λb−ρ = c−ρ , or b−ρ = λ−1 [c−ρ −
(1 − λ)a−ρ ]. Now raise each side to the power −1/ρ.
12
(b) (i) Since (−x)2 = x2 , f (x) = f (−x) for all x. (ii) f (x+1) = (x+1)2 +1 = x2 +2x+1+1 =
x2 + 2x + 2 and f (x) + f (1) = x2 + 1 + 2 = x2 + 3. Thus equality holds if and only if
x2 + 2x + 2 = x2 + 3, i.e. if and only if x = 1/2. (iii) f (2x) = (2x)2 + 1p= 4x2 + 1 and
√
2f (x) = 2x2 + 2. Now, 4x2 + 1 = 2x2 + 2 ⇐⇒ x2 = 1/2 ⇐⇒ x = ± 1/2 = ± 21 2.
4.7 Polynomials
3
3. (a) The answer is 2x2 + 2x + 4 + , because
x−1
(2x3 + 2x − 1) ÷ (x − 1)= 2x2 + 2x + 4
2x3 − 2x2
2x2 + 2x − 1
2x2 − 2x
4x − 1
4x − 4
3 remainder
13
(b) The answer is x2 + 1, because
(x4 + x3 + x2 + x) ÷ (x2 + x) = x2 + 1
x4 + x3
x2 + x
x2 + x
0
4x
(c) The answer is x3 − 4x2 + 3x + 1 − , because
x2 + x + 1
(x5 − 3x4 + 1) ÷ (x2 + x + 1) = x3 − 4x2 + 3x + 1
x5 + x4 + x3
− 4x4 − x3 +1
− 4x4 − 4x3 − 4x2
3x3 + 4x2 +1
3 2
3x + 3x + 3x
x2 − 3x + 1
x2 + x + 1
−4x remainder
4. (a) Since the graph intersects the x-axis at the two points x = −1 and x = 3, we try the
quadratic function f (x) = a(x + 1)(x − 3), for some constant a > 0. But the graph
passes through the point (1, −2), so we need f (1) = −2. Since f (1) = −4a for our chosen
function, a = 21 . This leads to the formula y = 12 (x + 1)(x − 3).
14
(b) Because the equation f (x) = 0 must have roots x = −3, 1, 2, we try the cubic function
f (x) = b(x + 3)(x − 1)(x − 2). Then f (0) = 6b. According to the graph, f (0) = −12. So
b = −2, and hence y = −2(x + 3)(x − 1)(x − 2).
(c) Here we try a cubic polynomial of the form y = c(x + 3)(x − 2)2 , with x = 2 as a double
root. Then f (0) = 12c. From the graph we see that f (0) = 6, and so c = 12 . This leads
to the formula y = 12 (x + 3)(x − 2)2 .
8. Polynomial division gives
(x2 − γx ) ÷ (x + β) = x − (β + γ)
2
x + βx
− (β + γ)x
− (β + γ)x−β(β + γ)
β(β + γ) remainder
and so
β(β + γ) αβ(β + γ)
E = α x − (β + γ) + = αx − α(β + γ) + .
x+β x+β
For parts (d)–(f) below, we use the definition aloga x = x for all a, x > 0.
(d) log2 x = 2 implies that 2log2 x = 22 or x = 4.
2
(e) logx e2 = 2 implies that xlogx e = x2 or e2 = x2 . Hence x = e.
15
(f) log3 x = −3 implies that 3log3 x = 3−3 or x = 1/27.
4. Directly, the equation Aert = Best implies that ert /est = B/A, so e(r−s)t = B/A. Taking the
1
ln of each side gives (r − s)t = ln(B/A), so t = ln B . Alternatively, apply ln to each
r−s A
side of the original equation, leading to ln A + rt = ln B + st. This gives the same solution.
5. Let t denote the number of years after 1990. Assuming continuous exponential growth, when
the GDP of the two nations is the same, one must have 1.2 · 1012 · e0.09t = 5.6 · 1012 · e0.02t .
Applying the answer found in part (a), we obtain
1 5.6 · 1012 1 14
t= ln = ln ≈ 22
0.09 − 0.02 1.2 · 1012 0.07 3
According to this, the two countries would have the same GDP approximately 22 years after
1990, so in 2012.
16
5 Properties of Functions
5.3 Inverse functions
4. (a) The function f does have an inverse since it is one-to-one. This is shown in the table by
the fact that all the numbers in the second row, the domain of f −1 , are different. The
inverse assigns to each number in the second row, the corresponding number in the first
row. In particular, f −1 (2) = −1.
(b) Since f (x) increases by 2 for each unit increase in x, one has f (x) = 2x + a for a suitable
constant a. But then a = f (0) = 4, so f (x) = 2x + 4. Solving y = 2x + 4 for x yields
x = 12 y − 2, so interchanging x and y gives y = f −1 (x) = 12 x − 2.
Using x as the independent variable, f −1 (x) = (2x + 1)/(x − 1). The domain of the
inverse is all x 6= 1.
(c) Here one has y = (1 − x3 )1/5 + 2 ⇐⇒ y − 2 = (1 − x3 )1/5 ⇐⇒ (y − 2)5 = 1 − x3 ⇐⇒
x3 = 1 − (y − 2)5 , which is equivalent to x = [1 − (y − 2)5 ]1/3 . With x as the free variable,
f −1 (x) = [1 − (x − 2)5 ]1/3 . For both f and f −1 , the whole of the real line R is both the
domain and the range.
10. (a) The domain is R and the range is (0, ∞), so the inverse is defined on (0, ∞). From
y = ex+4 one has ln y = x + 4, so x = ln y − 4, y > 0.
(b) The range is R, which is the domain of the inverse. From y = ln x−4, one has ln x = y +4,
and so x = ey+4 .
(c) The domain is R. On this domain the function is increasing, with y → ln 2 as x → −∞
and y → ∞ as x → ∞. So the range of the function is (ln 2, ∞). From y = ln 2 + ex−3
17
both axes. It comes in two separate parts: below y = −1; above y = 1. Putting x2 = 1
√ √
and then x2 = 9 yields the additional points (±1, ± 2) and (±3, ± 10).12
x2 + y 2 + Ax + By + C = 0 ⇐⇒ x2 + Ax + y 2 + By + C = 0
2 2 1
⇐⇒ x2 + Ax + 21 A + y 2 + By + 1
2 B = (A2 + B 2 − 4C)
4
2 2 1
⇐⇒ x + 21 A + y + 12 B = (A2 + B 2 − 4C).
4
Provided that A2 + B 2 > 4C, the last equation is that of a circle centred at (− 21 A, − 21 B) with
√
radius 12 A2 + B 2 − 4C. If A2 + B 2 = 4C, the graph consists only of the point (− 12 A, − 21 B).
For A2 + B 2 < 4C, the solution set is empty.
6 Differentiation
6.2 Tangents and derivatives
6. For parts (a)–(c) we set out the explicit steps of the recipe in given in the book; for parts
(d)–(f) we still follow the recipe, but express the steps more concisely.
12
The graph is a hyperbola. See the next section.
18
(a) (A) f (a + h) = f (0 + h) = 3h + 2; (B) f (a + h) − f (a) = f (h) − f (0) = 3h + 2 − 2 = 3h;
(C)–(D) [f (h) − f (0)]/h = 3; (E) [f (h) − f (0)]/h = 3 → 3 as h → 0, so f ′ (0) = 3. The
slope of the tangent at (0, 2) is 3.
(b) (A) f (a + h) = f (1 + h) = (1 + h)2 − 1 = 1 + 2h + h2 − 1 = 2h + h2 ;
(B) f (1 + h) − f (1) = 2h + h2 ; (C)–(D) [f (1 + h) − f (1)]/h = 2 + h;
(E) [f (1 + h) − f (1)]/h = 2 + h → 2 as h → 0, so f ′ (1) = 2.
(c) (A) f (3 + h) = 2 + 3/(3 + h); (B) f (3 + h) − f (3) = 2 + 3/(3 + h) − 3 = −h/(3 + h);
(C)–(D) [f (3 + h) − f (3)]/h = −1/(3 + h);
(E) [f (3 + h) − f (3)]/h = −1/(3 + h) → −1/3 as h → 0, so f ′ (3) = −1/3.
(d) [f (h) − f (0)]/h = (h3 − 2h)/h = h2 − 2 → −2 as h → 0, so f ′ (0) = −2.
h2 − 1 + 1
1 1 1
(e) [f (−1 + h) − f (−1)] = −1 + h + + 2 , which simplifies to =
h h −1 + h h(h − 1)
h
. This tends to 0 as h → 0, so f ′ (0) = 0.
h−1
1 1 1
(f) [f (1+h)−f (1)] = [(1+h)4 −1] = [(h4 +4h3 +6h2 +4h+1)−1] = h3 +4h2 +6h+4 → 4
h h h
as h → 0, so f ′ (1) = 4.
√ √
9. (a) Applying the formula (a − b)(a + b) = a2 − b2 with a = x + h and b = x gives
√ √ √ √
( x + h − x)( x + h + x) = (x + h) − x = h.
(b) By direct computation,
√ √ √ √
f (x + h) − f (x) ( x + h − x )( x + h + x ) 1
= √ √ =√ √ .
h h( x + h + x ) x+h+ x
f (x + h) − f (x) 1 1
(c) From part (b), as h → 0 one has → √ = x−1/2 .
h 2 x 2
19
f (2 + h) − f (2) (2 + h)2 + 2(2 + h) − 8 h2 + 6h
(c) = = = h + 6 → 6 as h → 0.
h h h
f (x) − f (a) x2 + 2x − a2 − 2a x2 − a2 + 2(x − a) (x − a)(x + a) + 2(x − a)
(d) = = = ,
x−a x−a x−a x−a
which equals x + a + 2 and tends to 2a + 2 as x → a.
(e) Same answer as part (d), putting x − a = h.
f (a + h) − f (a − h) (a + h)2 + 2a + 2h − (a − h)2 − 2a + 2h
(f) = = 4a + 4, which tends to
h h
4a + 4 as a limit as h → 0.
20
4x3 (x3 + 3x2 + x + 3) − (x4 + 1)(3x2 + 6x + 1) 1 1
(d) Here y ′ = 2 2
= − . Also y = 3 when
[(x + 1)(x + 3)] 9
x = 0, so the tangent is y = 13 − 19 x = −(x − 3)/9.
21
3 3 3 1 3 2
(d) y = ex ln x2 ⇒ y′ = 3x2 ex ln x2 + ex 2x = e x 2 2
3x ln x + .
x2 x
ex
(e) y = ln(ex + 1) ⇒ y ′ = .
ex +1
2x + 3
(f) y = ln(x2 + 3x − 1) ⇒ y ′ = .
x2
+ 3x − 1
(g) y = 2(ex − 1)−1 ⇒ y ′ = −2ex (ex − 1)−2 .
2 −x 2 −x
(h) y = e2x ⇒ y ′ = (4x − 1)e2x .
9. In these problems we can use logarithmic differentiation. Alternatively we can write the
functions in the form f (x) = eg(x) and then use the fact that f ′ (x) = eg(x) g ′ (x) = f (x)g ′ (x).
′
(a) Let f (x) = (2x)x . Then ln f (x) = x ln(2x), so ff (x) (x) 1
= 1 · ln(2x) + x · 2x · 2 = ln(2x) + 1.
′ x
Hence, f (x) = f (x)(ln(2x) + 1) = (2x) (ln x + ln 2 + 1).
√ √x √
(b) f (x) = x x = eln x = e x ln x , so
√
d √
√
x ln x
√
x ln x x √ 1
′
f (x) = e · ( x ln x) = x √ + = x x− 2 ( 21 ln x + 1).
dx 2 x x
√
(c) Here ln f (x) = x ln x = 21 x ln x, so f ′ (x)/f (x) = 12 (ln x + 1), which implies that f ′ (x) =
1 √ x
2 ( x) (ln x + 1).
22
Review exercises for Chapter 6
2
15. (a) y ′ = x ln x ≥ 0 if x ≥ 1.
ex − e−x
(b) y ′ = ≥ 0 ⇐⇒ ex ≥ e−x ⇐⇒ e2x ≥ 1 ⇐⇒ x ≥ 0
ex + e−x
3x (x − 1)(x − 2)
(c) y ′ = 1 − 2 = ≥ 0 ⇐⇒ x ≤ 1 or x ≥ 2, as a sign diagram will show.
x +2 x2 + 2
7 Derivatives in Use
7.1 Implicit differentiation
3. (a) Implicit differentiation w.r.t. x yields (∗) 1 − y ′ + 3y + 3xy ′ = 0. Solving for y ′ yields
y ′ = (1 + 3y)/(1 − 3x). The definition of the function implies that y = (x − 2)/(1 − 3x).
Substituting this in the expression for y ′ gives y ′ = −5/(1 − 3x)2 . Differentiating (∗)
w.r.t. x gives −y ′′ + 3y ′ + 3y ′ + 3xy ′′ = 0. Inserting y ′ = (1 + 3y)/(1 − 3x) and solving
for y ′′ gives y ′′ = 6y ′ /(1 − 3x) = −30/(1 − 3x)3 .
(b) Implicit differentiation w.r.t. x yields (∗) 5y 4 y ′ = 6x5 , so y ′ = 6x5 /5y 4 = (6/5)x1/5 .
Differentiating (∗) w.r.t. x gives 20y 3 (y ′ )2 + 5y 4 y ′′ = 30x4 . Inserting y ′ = 6x5 /5y 4 and
solving for y ′′ yields y ′′ = 6x4 y −4 − 4y −1 (y ′′ )2 = 6x4 y −4 − (144/25)x10 y −9 = (6/25)x−4/5 .
10. (a) Differentiate w.r.t. x while keeping in mind that y depends on x. This yields the equation
2(x2 + y 2 )(2x + 2yy ′ ) = a2 (2x − 2yy ′ ). Then solve for y ′ .
(b) Note that x = 0 would imply that y = 0. Excluding this possibility, we see that y ′ = 0
when x2 + y 2 = a2 /2, or y 2 = 21 a2 − x2 . Inserting this into the given equation yields
√ √
x = ± 41 a 6 and so y = ± 21 a 2. This yields the four points on the graph at which the
tangent is horizontal.
Thus, dY /dI = 1/[1 − f ′ (Y ) + g ′ (Y )]. Imports should increase when income increases, so
g ′ (Y ) > 0. It follows that dY /dI > 0.
(c) Differentiating (∗) w.r.t. I yields, in simplified notation, d2 Y /dI 2 = (f ′′ − g ′′ )(dY /dI) +
(f ′ −g ′ )(d2 Y /dI 2 ), so d2 Y /dI 2 = (f ′′ −g ′′ )(dY /dI)/(1−f ′ +g ′ )2 = (f ′′ −g ′′ )/(1−f ′ +g ′ )3 .
23
7.3 Differentiating the inverse
5. (a) dy/dx = −e−x−5 , so dx/dy = 1/(dy/dx) = 1/(−e−x−5 ) = −ex+5 .
(b) dy/dx = −e−x /(e−x + 3), so dx/dy = −(e−x + 3)/e−x = −1 − 3ex
(c) Implicit differentiation w.r.t. x yields y 3 + x(3y 2 )(dy/dx) − 3x2 y − x3 (dy/dx) = 2. Solve
for dy/dx, and then invert.
1 ′ 1 1 1 1
f (x) ≈ f (0) + f (0)x + f ′′ (0)x + f ′′′ (0)x3 + f (4) (0)x4 + f (5) (0)x5
1! 2! 3! 4! 5!
1 1 1 1
= x − x2 + x3 − x4 + x5 .
2 3 4 5
√
3. With f (x) = 5(ln(1 + x) − 1 + x) = 5 ln(1 + x) − 5(1 + x)1/2 we get
5 5
f ′ (x) = 5(1 + x)−1 − (1 + x)−1/2 and f ′′ (x) = −5(1 + x)−2 + (1 + x)−3/2
2 4
So f (0) = −5, f ′ (0) = 52 , and f ′′ (0) = − 15
4 . Hence, the Taylor polynomial of order 2 about
x = 0 is f (0) + f (0)x + 2 f (0)x = −5 + 25 x − 15
′ 1 ′′ 2 2
8 x .
4. (a) We use Taylor’s formula (7.6.3) with g(x) = (1 + x)1/3 and n = 2. Then g ′ (x) =
1 −2/3 , g ′′ (x) = − 2 (1 + x)−5/3 , and g ′′′ (x) = 10 (1 + x)−8/3 , so g(0) = 1, g ′ (0) = 1 ,
3 (1 + x) 9 27 3
10
g ′′ (0) = − 29 , g ′′′ (c) = 27 (1 + c)−8/3 . It follows that g(x) = 1 + 13 x − 19 x2 + R3 (x), where
R3 (x) = 61 1027 (1 + c)
−8/3 x3 = 5 (1 + c)−8/3 x3 .
81
(b) c ∈ (0, x) and x ≥ 0, so (1 + c)−8/3 ≤ 1, and the inequality follows.
24
√
(c) Note that 3
1003 = 10(1 + 3 · 10−3 )1/3 . Using the approximation in part (a) gives
1 1
(1 + 3 · 10−3 )1/3 ≈ 1 + 3 · 10−3 − (3 · 10−3 )2 = 1 + 10−3 − 10−6 = 1.000999
3 9
√
So 3 1003 ≈ 10.00999. By part (b), the error R3 (x) in the approximation (1+3·10−3 )1/3 ≈
5
1.000999 satisfies |R3 (x)| ≤ 81 (3 · 10−3 )3 = 35 10−9 . Hence the error in the approximation
√3
1003 ≈ 10.00999 is 10|R3 (x)| ≤ 50 3 10
−9 < 2 · 10−8 , implying that the answer is correct
to 7 decimal places.
7.7 Elasticities
x dA
9. (a) Elx A = = 0.
A dx
x x ′ xf ′ xg ′
(b) Elx (f g) = (f g)′ = (f g + f g ′ ) = + = Elx f + Elx g.
fg fg f g
′
f x f xg gf ′ − f g ′ xf ′ xg ′
(c) Elx = = = − = Elx f − Elx g.
g (f /g) g f g2 f g
(d) See the answer in the book.
(e) This case is like (d), but with +g replaced by −g, and +g ′ by −g ′ .
(f) z = f (u) and u = g(x) imply that
x dz x u dz du u dz x du
Elx z = = = = Elu f (u) Elx u.
z dx u z du dx z du u dx
7.8 Continuity
3. By the properties of continuous functions stated in the book, all the functions are continuous
wherever they are defined. So (a) and (d) are defined everywhere. In (b) we must exclude
x = 1; in (c) the function is defined for x < 2. Next, in (e) we must exclude values of x that
make the denominator 0. These values satisfy x2 + 2x − 2 = 0, or (x + 1)2 = 3, so they are
√
x = ± 3 − 1. Finally, in (f), the first fraction requires x > 0, and then the other fraction is
also defined.
25
(b) No vertical asymptote. Moreover. (2x3 −3x2 +3x−6)÷(x2 +1) = 2x−3+(x−3)/(x2 +1),
so y = 2x − 3 is an asymptote as x → ±∞.
(c) Vertical asymptote, x = 1. Moreover, (3x2 + 2x) ÷ (x − 1) = 3x + 5 + 5/(x − 1), so
y = 3x + 5 is an asymptote as x → ±∞.
(d) Vertical asymptote, x = 1. Moreover,
So y = 5x is an asymptote as x → ±∞.
√
9. This is rather tricky because the denominator is 0 at x1,2 = 2 ± 3. A sign diagram shows
that f (x) > 0 only in (−∞, 0) and in (x1 , x2 ). The text explains where f increases. See also
Fig. SM7.9.9.
y
6
3x
f (x) =
4 −x 2 + 4x − 1
x
−6 −4 −2 2 4 6 8
−2
−4
Figure SM7.9.9
f (−1.9) −0.1749
x1 = −1.9 − = −1.9 − ≈ −1.9 + 0.021 = −1.879
f (−1.9)
′ 8.454
f (0.4) −0.4624
y1 = 0.4 − ′ = 0.4 − ≈ 0.4 − 0.053 = 0.347
f (0.4) −8.704
f (1.5) −0.5625
z1 = 1.5 − ′ = 1.5 − ≈ 1.5 + 0.034 = 1.534
f (1.5) 16.75
26
7.12 L’Hôpital’s rule
x−1 1
3. (a) lim = “0/0” = lim = 21 . Alternatively, use x2 − 1 = (x + 1)(x − 1).
x→1 x2 − 1 x→1 2x
x3 + 3x2 − 4 3x2 + 6x 6x + 6
(b) lim 3 2
= “0/0” = lim 2
= “0/0” = lim = 3.
x→−2 x + 5x + 8x + 4 x→−2 3x + 10x + 8 x→−2 6x + 10
9. Here
f (x) 1/g(x) −1/(g(x))2 g ′ (x)
L = lim = lim = “0/0” = lim ·
x→a g(x) x→a 1/f (x) x→a −1/(f (x))2 f ′ (x)
The conclusion follows. (This argument ignores problems with “division by 0”, when either
f ′ (x) or g ′ (x) tends to 0 as x tends to a.)
27
where c is some number between 0 and 21 . Now,
1 ( 1 )6 ( 1 )6 1
R6 ( ) = 2 e c < 2 2 = ≈ 0.00004340,
2 6! 6! 23040
1
1
where we used the fact that c < 2 implies ec < e 2 < 2. Thus, it follows that
1
1
2 ( 12 )2 ( 21 )3 ( 12 )4 ( 21 )5 1 1 1 1 1
e2 ≈ 1 + + + + + =1+ + + + + ≈ 1.6486979.
1! 2! 3! 4! 5! 2 8 48 384 3840
1
Because the error is less than 0.000043, the approximation e 2 ≈ 1.649 is correct to 3 decimal
places.
28
8 Single-variable Optimization
8.2 Simple tests for extreme points
2. Note that √ √
′ 8(3x2 + 4) − (8x)(6x) 8(2 − 3x)(2 + 3x)
h (x) = = ,
(3x2 + 4)2 (3x2 + 4)2
√ √
so h has critical points at x1 = −2 3/3 and x2 = 2 3/3. A sign diagram shows that
h′ (x) < 0 in (−∞, x1 ) and in (x2 , ∞), whereas h′ (x) > 0 in (x1 , x2 ). Therefore h is strictly
decreasing in (−∞, x1 ], strictly increasing in [x1 , x2 ], and strictly decreasing again in [x2 , ∞).
√
Then, because h(x) → 0 as x → ±∞, it follows that the maximum of h occurs at x2 = 2 3/3
√
and the minimum at x1 = −2 3/3.
10. (a) f ′ (x) = k − Aαe−αx = 0 when x = x0 = (1/α) ln(Aα/k). Note that x0 > 0 if and only
if Aα > k. Moreover f ′′ (x) = Aα2 e−αx > 0 for all x ≥ 0, so x0 solves the minimization
problem.
(b) Substituting for A in the answer to (a) gives the expression for the optimal height x0 .
Its value increases as p0 (probability of flooding) or V (cost of flooding) increases, but
decreases as δ (interest rate) or k (marginal construction cost) increases. The signs of
these responses are obviously what an economist would expect.
29
(a) f ′ (x) = −2 for all x in [0, 3], so the recipe tells us that both the maximum and minimum
points are at the ends of the interval [0, 3]. Since f (0) = −1 and f (3) = −7, the maximum
is at x = 0, the minimum at x = 3.13
(b) f (−1) = f (2) = 10 and f ′ (x) = 3x2 − 3 = 0 at x = ±1. The only critical point in the
interval [−1, 2] is x = 1, where f (1) = 6. There are two maxima at the endpoints, and a
minimum at x = 1.
(c) f (x) = x + 1/x, so f (1/2) = f (2) = 5/2 at the endpoints. Also, f ′ (x) = 1 − 1/x2 = 0 at
x = ±1. The only critical point in the interval [ 21 , 2] is x = 1, where f (1) = 2. There are
two maxima at the endpoints, and a minimum at x = 1.
√
(d) At the endpoints one has f (−1) = 4 and f ( 5) = 0. Because f ′ (x) = 5x2 (x2 − 3), there
√ √
are two critical points in the interval [−1, 5] at x = 0 and x = 3. The values at these
√ √
critical points are f (0) = 0 and f ( 3) = −6 3. The maximum is at x = −1 and the
√
minimum is at x = 3.
(e) f ′ (x) = 3x2 − 9000x + 6 · 106 = 3(x − 1000)(x − 2000) = 0 when x = 1000 and x = 2000.
At these critical points f (1000) = 2.5 · 109 and f (2000) = 2 · 109 . There is a minimum at
the endpoint x = 0 and a maximum at x = 3000.
6. (a) (f (2) − f (1))/(2 − 1) = (4 − 1)/1 = 3 and f ′ (x) = 2x, so f ′ (x) = 3 when x = x∗ = 3/2.
√ √
(b) (f (1) − f (0))/1 = (0 − 1)/1 = −1 and f ′ (x) = −x/ 1 − x2 = −1 when x = 1 − x2 .
Squaring each side of the last equation gives x2 = 1 − x2 and so x2 = 21 . This has two
√ √
solutions x = ± 12 2, of which only the positive solution satisfies x = 1 − x2 . So we
√
require x = x∗ = 21 2.
(c) (f (6) − f (2))/4 = −1/6 and f ′ (x) = −2/x2 = −1/6 when −12/x2 = −1 or x2 = 12, and
√ √ √
so x = ± 12. The required solution in [2, 6] is x = x∗ = 12 = 2 3.
√ √ √
(d) (f (4) − f (0))/4 = 1/4 = ( 25 − 9)/4 = (5 − 3)/4 = 1/2 and f ′ (x) = 21 2x/ 9 + x2 =
√ √
x/ 9 + x2 = 1/2 when 2x = 9 + x2 . Squaring each side of the last equation gives
√
4x2 = 9 + x2 and so 3x2 = 9. This has two solutions x = ± 3, of which only the positive
√ √
solution satisfies x/ 9 + x2 = 1/2. So we require x = x∗ = 3.
30
(b) f ′ (x) = 3x2 − 3 = 0 for x = ±1. Because f ′′ (x) = 6x, we have f ′′ (−1) = −6 and
f ′′ (1) = 6, so x = −1 is a local maximum point, and x = 1 is a local minimum point.
(c) f ′ (x) = 1 − 1/x2 = 0 for x = ±1. With f ′′ (x) = 2/x3 , we have f ′′ (−1) = −2 and
f ′′ (1) = 2, so x = −1 is a local maximum point, and x = 1 is a local minimum point.
(d) f ′ (x) = 5x4 − 15x2 = 5x2 (x2 − 3) and f ′′ (x) = 20x3 − 30x. There are three critical points
√ √ √ √
at x = 0 and x = ± 3. Because f ′′ (0) = 0, whereas f ′′ (− 3) = −20 · 3 3 + 30 3 =
√ √ √ √
−30 3 < 0 and f ′′ ( 3) = 30 3 > 0, there is a local maximum at x = − 3 and a local
√
minimum at x = 3.
(e) This parabola has a local (and global) minimum at x = 3.
(f) f ′ (x) = 3x2 + 6x = 3x(x + 2) and f ′′ (x) = 6x + 6. There are two critical points at x = 0
and x = −2. Because f ′′ (0) = 6 and f ′′ (−2) = −6, there is a local maximum at x = −2
and a local minimum at x = 0.
y
8
6
4
2
x
−6 −4 −2 2 4 6 8 10
−2
−4
Figure SM8.6.3
(a) The function f (x) is defined if and only if x 6= 0 and x ≥ −6. We have f (x) = 0 at
x = −6 and at x = −2. At any other point x in the domain, f (x) has the same sign as
(x + 2)/x, so f (x) > 0 if x ∈ (−6, −2) or x ∈ (0, ∞).
(b) We first find the derivative of f :
31
7. f (x) = x3 + ax + b → ∞ as x → ∞, and f (x) → −∞ as x → −∞. By the intermediate value
theorem, the continuous function f has at least one real root. We have f ′ (x) = 3x2 + a. We
consider two cases.
First, in case a ≥ 0, one has f ′ (x) > 0 for all x 6= 0, so f is strictly increasing, and there is
only one real root. Note that 4a3 + 27b2 ≥ 0 in this case.
p √
Second, in case a < 0, one has f ′ (x) = 0 for x = ± −a/3 = ± p, where p = −a/3. Because
√ √
f ′′ (x) = 3x, the function f has a local maximum at x = − p, where y = b + 2p p, and a
√ √
local minimum at x = p, where y = b − 2p p. If either of these local extreme values is
0, the equation has a double root, which is the case if and only if 4p3 = b2 , that is, if and
only if 4a3 + 27b2 = 0. Otherwise, the equation has three real roots if and only if the local
maximum value is positive and the local minimum value is negative. This occurs if and only
√ √ √
if both b > −2p p and b < 2p p. Equivalent conditions are |b| < 2p p ⇐⇒ b2 < 4p3 ⇐⇒
4a3 + 27b2 < 0.
32
y
0.5
h
x
−1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.5
−0.5
h−1
−1.0
−1.5
Figure SM8.R.8
√ √
positive if and only if x2 > a, i.e. if and only if x < − a or x > a. The numerator
in the expression for f (x) is x, and a sign diagram then reveals that f (x) is positive in
√ √
(− a, 0) and in ( a, ∞). he The graph of f is symmetric about the origin because
−x x
f (−x) = p = − √
3
= −f (x),
3
(−x)2 − a x2 − a
√
(b) Writing 3
x2 − a as (x2 − a)1/3 and then differentiating yields
11. Note first that f (x) → 0 as x → ±∞, as can be shown by dividing both numerator and
denominator by x3 , then taking limits. Next, differentiation yields
18x2 (x4 + x2 + 2) − 6x3 (4x3 + 2x) −6x2 (x4 − x2 − 6) −6x2 (x2 − 3)(x2 + 2)
f ′ (x) = = = ,
(x4 + x2 + 2)2 (x4 + x2 + 2)2 (x4 + x2 + 2)2
14
f ′′ (x) is 0 at these points, and changes sign around each of them.
33
√
so f has critical points at x = 0 and at x = ± 3. Moreover, f ′ changes sign from negative to
√
positive as x increases through − 3, then it switches back to negative as x increases through
√ √ √
3. It follows that x = 3 is a local (and global) maximum point, that x = − 3 is a local
(and global) minimum point, and x = 0 is neither. (It is an inflection point.) Note moreover
that f (−x) = −f (x) for all x, so the graph is symmetric about the origin. The graph of f is
shown in Fig. A8.R.11 in the book.
9 Integration
9.1 Indefinite integrals
(t3 + 2t − 3) dt = t3 dt + 2t dt − 3 dt = 14 t4 + t2 − 3t + C.
R R R R
3. (a)
(b) (x − 1)2 dx = (x2 − 2x + 1) dx = 31 x3 − x2 + x + C. Alternatively, since dx d
(x − 1)3 =
R R
3(x − 1)2 , we have (x − 1)2 dx = 13 (x − 1)3 + C1 . This agrees with the first answer, with
R
C1 = C + 1/3.
(c) (x − 1)(x + 2) dx = (x2 + x − 2) dx = 31 x3 + 12 x2 − 2x + C.
R R
(d) First evaluate (x + 2)3 = x3 + 6x2 + 12x + 8, then integrate term by term to get
(x + 2)3 dx = 41 x4 + 2x3 + 6x2 + 8x + C. Or more directly, check that (x + 2)3 =
R R
1 4
4 (x + 2) + C1 .
(e) (e3x − e2x + ex ) dx = 31 e3x − 21 e2x + ex + C.
R
Z 3 Z
x − 3x + 4 2 4 1
(f) dx = x −3+ dx = x3 − 3x + 4 ln |x| + C
x x 3
(y − 2)2 y 2 − 4y + 4
4. (a) First simplify the integrand to obtain √ = √ = y 3/2 − 4y 1/2 + 4y −1/2 .
y y
Next, integrate term by term to get
(y − 2)2 2 8
Z Z
√ dy = (y 3/2 − 4y 1/2 + 4y −1/2 ) dy = y 5/2 − y 3/2 + 8y 1/2 + C.
y 5 3
x3 1
(b) By polynomial division, the integrand is = x2 − x + 1 − . It follows that
x+1 x+1
x3 x3 x2
Z
dx = − + x − ln |x + 1| + C.
x+1 3 2
d 1
(1 + x2 )16 = 16(1 + x2 )15 · 2x = 32x(1 + x2 )15 , so x(1 + x2 )15 dx = 32 (1 + x2 )16 + C.
R
(c)
dx
11. f ′ (x) = (x−2 +x3 +2) dx = −x−1 + 14 x4 +2x+C. With f ′ (1) = 41 we have 41 = −1+ 14 +2+C,
R
x4 x5
Z
f (x) = −1
−x + + 2x − 1 dx = − ln x + + x2 − x + D.
4 20
1 1
With f (1) = 0 we have 0 = − ln 1 + 20 + 1 − 1 + D, so D = − 20 .
34
9.2 Area and definite integrals
5. We consider only parts (c) and (f).
Z 3 3 3
1 2 1 3 1 1 1 3 27 32 5
(c) x − x dx = ( x3 − x4 ) = x (2 − x) = − + = .
−2 2 3 −2 6 12 −2 12 12 12 12
Z 3 3
1 1 9 4 5
(f) + t dt = ln(t − 1) + t2 = ln 2 + − = ln 2 + .
2 t−1 2 2 2 2 2
√ √
6. (a) f (x) = x3 −3x2 +2x and so f ′ (x) = 3x2 −6x+2 = 0 for x0 = 1− 3/3 and x1 = 1+ 3/3.
We see that f ′ (x) > 0 ⇐⇒ x < x0 or x > x1 . Also, f ′ (x) < 0 ⇐⇒ x0 < x < x1 . So f
is (strictly) increasing in (−∞, x0 ] and in [x1 , ∞), but (strictly) decreasing in [x0 , x1 ].
(b) See the graph in the text. The integral is
Z 1 Z 1 1
f (x) dx = (x3 − 3x2 + 2x) dx = ( 41 x4 − x3 + x2 ) = 1
4 −0= 1
4
0 0 0
35
(b) See Fig. A9.3.12.
(c) In Fig. A9.3.12 the graphs of f and g are symmetric about the line y = x, so the areas
of A and B are equal. But the area of B is the difference between: (i) the area of a
rectangle with base a and height 10; (ii) the area below the graph of g over the interval
[0, a]. Therefore,
Z a
A = B = 10a − (ex/2 + 4ex/4 ) dx = 10a − 2ea/2 − 16ea/4 + 2 + 16
0
√ √ √ √
Because a = f (10) = 4 ln( 14−2), we have ea/2 = ( 14−2)2 = 14−4 14+4 = 18−4 14
√
and also ea/4 = 14 − 2. Hence,
√ √ √ √
A = B = 10a − 2(18 − 4 14) − 16( 14 − 2) + 18 = 40 ln( 14 − 2) + 14 − 8 14 ≈ 6.26
x ln x dx = 21 x2 ln x − 1 21
dx = 21 x2 ln x − 1
= 21 x2 ln x − 14 x2 + C.
R R R
(d) 2x x 2 x dx
(c) First use integration by parts on the indefinite integral. By Eq. (9.5.1) with f (x) = x2
and g(x) = ex , Z Z
x e dx = x e − 2xex dx.
2 x 2 x
(∗)
36
To evaluate the last integral we must use integration by parts once more. With f (x) = 2x
and g(x) = ex , we get 2xex dx = 2xex − 2ex dx = 2xex − (2ex + C). Inserted into (∗),
R R
Z 1 1
x2 ex dx = (x2 ex − 2xex + 2ex ) = (e − 2e + 2e) − (0 − 0 + 2) = e − 2
0 0
(d) We must write the integrand in the form f (x)g ′ (x). If we let f (x) = x and g ′ (x) =
√
1 + x = (1 + x)1/2 , then what is g? A certain amount of reflection should suggest that
it is worth trying g(x) = 23 (1 + x)3/2 . Using (9.5.2) then gives
Z 3 3 Z 3
√ 2 3/2 2 2 2 32
x 1 + x dx = x · (1 + x) − 1 · (1 + x)3/2 dx = 3 · · 43/2 − (1 + x)5/2
0 0 3 0 3 3 3 05
R3 √ 4 4 11
It follows that 0 x 1 + x dx = 16 − 15 (45/2 − 1) = 16 − 15 · 31 = 7 15 . Alternatively, we
√
could have found the indefinite integral of x 1 + x first, and then evaluated the definite
integral by using definition (9.2.3) of the definite integral.
√
Figure SM9.5.2(d) shows the area under the graph of y = x 1 + x over the interval [0, 3].
11
You should ask yourself whether 7 15 is a reasonable estimate of the area of A.
y
√
y =x 1+x
6
2
A
1
x
1 2 3 4 5
Figure SM9.5.2(d)
T T T T
−1 −1 −rt −T −rT 1
Z Z Z
−rt
6. (a) By formula (9.5.2), te dt = t e−rt − e dt = e + e−rt dt
0 0 r 0 r r r 0
−T −rT 1 T −1 −rt 1
= e + e = 2 (1 − (1 + rT )e−rT ). Multiply this expression by b.
r r 0 r r
RT R T −rt RT
(b) 0 (a + bt)e dt = a 0 e dt + b 0 te−rt dt and so on using the result of part (a).
−rt
RT RT RT RT
(c) 0 (a − bt + ct2 )e−rt dt = a 0 e−rt dt − b 0 te−rt dt + c 0 t2 e−rt dt. Now use the results
of parts (a) and (b) together with
Z T T Z T
1 2 −rT 2 T −rt
1 −rt 1 −rt
Z
2 −rt 2
t e dt = t − e − 2t − e dt = − T e + te dt.
0 0 r 0 r r r 0
37
9.6 Integration by substitution
2. (a) See the answer given in the book.
3 +2 1 u 3 +2
(b) With u = x3 +2 we get du = 3x2 dx and x2 ex = 13 eu +C = 13 ex
R R
dx = 3 e du +C.
(c) A first try might be u = x + 2, which gives du = dx and
ln(x + 2) ln u
Z Z
dx = du.
2x + 4 2u
This, however, looks no simpler than the original integral.
1
A better idea is to substitute u = ln(x + 2). Then du = dx and
x+2
ln(x + 2) 1 1 1
Z Z
2
dx = u du = u2 + C = ln(x + 2) + C.
2x + 4 2 4 4
x3 x2 · x u−1
Z Z Z Z
1 1
dx = dx = 2 du = 2 (u−2 − u−3 ) du
(1 + x2 )3 (1 + x2 )3 u3
1 1
= − 21 u−1 + 14 u−2 + C = − + +C
2(1 + x2 ) (1 + x2 )2
√
(f) With u = 4 − x3 one has u2 = 4 − x3 and 2u du = −3x2 dx, so
2
Z p Z p Z
5 3
x 4− x3 dx
= x 4− = (4 − u )u − x3 x2 dx
u du 2
3
Z
8 2 8 2 8 2
= − u2 + u4 du = − u3 + u5 + C = − (4 − x3 )3/2 + (4 − x3 )5/2 + C
3 3 9 15 9 15
R1 R1
6. (a) I = 0 (x4 − x9 )(x5 − 1)12 dx = 0 −x4 (x5 − 1)13 dx. Introduce u = x5 − 1. Then
du = 5x4 dx. Now we use (9.6.2) along with the facts that u = −1 when x = 0 and u = 0
R0 0 1 14
when x = 1. The integral becomes I = − −1 51 u13 du = − −1 70 u = 701
.
15
Actually, even integration by parts works in this case. See Problem 9.5.2(d).
38
√
(b) With u = x one has u2 = x and 2u du = dx. Then,16
ln x
Z Z Z
2
√ dx = 2 ln u du = 4 ln u du = 4(u ln u − u) + C
x
√ √ √ √ √
= 4 x ln x − 4 x + C = 2 x ln x − 4 x + C
√
(c) With u = 1 + x one has (u − 1)2 = x, so 2(u − 1) du = dx. Again we use (9.6.2) along
with the facts that u = 1 when x = 0 and u = 3 when x = 4. The specified integral
becomes17
Z 3 Z 3 3
2(u − 1) 1/2 −1/2 2 3/2 1/2
8
√ du = 2 (u − u ) du = 2 3u − 2u = .
1 u 1 1 3
√ √
1
7. (a) With u = 1 + e x one has du = 2 x
√ ·e x dx. Now x = 1 gives u = 1 + e and x = 4 gives
u = 1 + e2 . Thus,
√
4 1+e2 1+e2
e x 2
Z Z
√ √ dx = du = 2 ln u = 2 ln(1 + e2 ) − 2 ln(1 + e).
1 x (1 + e x ) 1+e u 1+e
1
because 3 − ln(e1/3 + 1) = ln[e1/3 /(e1/3 + 1)] = − ln(e−1/3 + 1).18
(c) With z 4 = 2x − 1 one has 4z 3 dz = 2 dx. Also x = 8.5 gives z = 2 and x = 41 gives z = 3.
The integral becomes
3 3 3
2z 3 z2
1
Z Z Z
dz = 2 dz = 2 z+1+ dz
2 z2 − z 2 z−1 2 z−1
3
1 2
=2 2 z + z + ln(z − 1) = 7 + 2 ln 2
2
39
(b) Using a simplified notation and the result in Example 1(a), we have
∞ 2 ∞ 2 ∞
1 1 1
Z Z
−λx −λx
x− λe dx = − x− e + 2 x− e−λx dx
0 λ 0 λ 0 λ
∞ ∞
1 2 1 2 2 1
Z Z
= 2 +2 xe−λx dx − e−λx dx = 2
+ 2− 2 = 2
λ 0 λ 0 λ λ λ λ
where we have used both the result of Example 1(a) and part (a) in order to derive the
penultimate equality.
(c) Using the result of part (b) in order to derive the penultimate equality, we get
3
∞ ∞
1 3 −λx 1 2 −λx
Z ∞
1
Z
−λx
x− λe dx = − x− e + 3 x− e dx
0 λ 0 λ 0 λ
3 ∞ 1 2 −λx
Z
1 1 3 1 2
=− 3 + x− λe dx = − 3 + · 2 = 3
λ λ 0 λ λ λ λ λ
5. (a) f ′ (x) = (1 − 3 ln x)/x4 = 0 at x = e1/3 , with f ′ (x) > 0 for x < e1/3 and f ′ (x) < 0 for
x > e1/3 . Hence f has a maximum at (e1/3 , 1/3e). Since f (x) → −∞ as x → 0+ , there
is no minimum. Use l’Hôpital’s rule to show that f (x) → 0 as x → ∞.
Rb b Rb b
(b) Here, a x−3 ln x dx = − a 21 x−2 ln x + a 21 x−3 dx = a − 12 x−2 ln x − 14 x−2 .
R ∞ −3
This diverges when b = 1 and a → 0. But 1 x ln x dx = 1/4.
3 √ √ √ √
Here, I1 = limε→0+ (2 x + 2 ) = lim ε→0 + (2 5 − 2 ε ) = 2 5,
−2+ε
3−ε √ √ √ √
and I2 = limε→0+ −2 (−2 3 − x ) = limε→0+ (−2 ε + 2 5 ) = 2 5.
x−µ 1
12. All three parts (a)–(c) use the substitution u = √ , which gives du = √ dx, and so
√ 2σ σ 2
dx = σ 2 du.
Z +∞ Z +∞
1 2
(a) f (x) dx = √ e−u du = 1, by Eq. (9.7.8).
−∞ π −∞
Z +∞
1
Z +∞ √ 2
(b) xf (x) dx = √ (µ + 2σu) e−u du = µ, using part (a) and Example 9.7.3.
−∞ π −∞
2 √
Z +∞ Z +∞ Z +∞
1 2 2
(c) First, (x − µ)2 f (x) dx = 2σ 2 u2 √ e−u σ 2 du = σ 2 √ u2 e−u du.
−∞ −∞ σ 2π π −∞
R b 2 −u2 b 2 b 2
du = − 12 a ue−u + a 21 e−u du for all real
R
Now integrating by parts yields a u e
b 2 2 2
a, b. Because a ue−u = be−b − ae−a → 0 as a → −∞ and b → ∞, it follows that
R +∞ 2 −u2 R +∞ 2 √ R +∞
−∞ u e du = −∞ 12 e−u du = 21 π by part (a). Hence −∞ (x − µ)2 f (x) dx = σ 2 .
40
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
I wished to go out again to look for my friend the bull elephant, but
I was unable to put my foot on the ground in consequence of my
injured instep. After our evening meal, which we had taken under the
trees outside the tent, George and I had an interesting chat with El
Hakim about elephant-hunting, upon which subject he was a
veritable mine of information. He had shot elephants persistently for
the previous four years in Somaliland, Galla-land, and the country
round Lake Rudolph, having killed over 150, on one occasion
shooting twenty-one elephants in twenty-one days—a fairly good
record. Commenting on the size of the tusks obtainable in the
districts north of the Waso Nyiro River, he mentioned that his largest
pair weighed just over 218 lbs., and measured 9 feet in length.
Naturally, exciting incidents, when in pursuit of his favourite quarry,
were numerous. Once he sighted a solitary bull feeding in the open
plain some little distance away from his camp. Snatching up an 8-
bore rifle and two or three cartridges, he started in pursuit. On
proceeding to load his weapon, he found that in his hurry he had
brought away the wrong cartridges! They were by a different maker
than those usually used in the rifle, and there was a slight difference
in the turning of the flange, which caused them to jam a little. He
forced them in, and, by an exercise of strength, closed the breech.
After a careful stalk he reached a favourable position for a shot,
and, taking aim, banged off. The rifle exploded with a terrific report,
the barrels blowing off in his hands, fortunately without doing him
any injury—the explosion of 10 drams of powder being too much for
the incompletely closed breech-locking grip. There was El Hakim
with the butt of his rifle in his hand and the barrels in the other,
vaguely wondering in what manner the beast would kill him, and, no
doubt, feeling very much de trop. The elephant, who was hit in the
shoulder, turned towards him, and, after regarding him with a
prolonged stare, turned away again, and moved slowly off as if a
bullet in the shoulder was of little or no consequence, leaving his
discomfited assailant considerably relieved.
Another time he took the same 8-bore—which, by the way, had not
been repaired—and started in pursuit of a herd of elephants. He
loaded the weapons, and, after closing the breech, bound it round
and round very tightly with a leather bootlace. On the first discharge,
stock and barrels again parted company; whereupon he handed the
useless weapon to one of his bearers, and, taking an old Martini in
exchange, rushed off after the herd, and bagged three more
elephants.
In Somaliland, one of the favourite amusements of his party was
riding out, mounted on light Somali ponies, to bait wild elephants.
Their shikaries would perhaps locate a couple of the animals in a
small clump of trees, where they were resting during the heat of the
day. One of the party would then ride up and fire a pistol at one of
them. The result, of course, would be a scream of rage, and a
furious charge by the insulted animal. Horse and rider would at once
make themselves scarce. The elephant would seldom charge more
than 100 yards or so away from cover, but at that distance, or under,
would halt and then slowly return, thus giving another member of the
party a chance. With a wild shout another horse and rider would
gallop at full speed across the elephant’s path, just out of reach.
Round would come the huge beast in another attempt to put an end
to what it justly considered a nuisance—an attempt foredoomed to
failure. One after another the horsemen would gallop up to the now
thoroughly infuriated beast, shouting and firing pistols, provoking
ugly rushes first at one and then another of them—for all the world
like a lot of schoolboys playing touch. Sometimes one or other of
them had a narrow escape, but somebody would nip in at the critical
moment and divert the elephant’s attention. A slip or a fall would
have meant a horrible death from the feet and tusks of the enraged
pachyderm; but the ponies were as agile as their riders, and enjoyed
the fun every whit as much.
We had no ponies, and playing with elephants in that manner
would not have been sufficiently amusing when mounted on a mule,
which had a habit of violently shying whenever it was urged faster
than a moderate trot. El Hakim once had a very unpleasant
experience through this mule’s aggravating peculiarity. He was riding
ahead of the safari, when he noticed a herd of elephants feeding a
mile or so in front. Taking his rifle from the bearer, he trotted after
them. The elephants moved slowly on, and disappeared over a ridge
some distance ahead. El Hakim urged the mule faster, but, in spite of
his efforts, on gaining the top of the ridge, he had the mortification of
seeing his quarry moving off at an ever-increasing speed. Fearing
that he would lose them after all, he jammed his spurs into the mule,
and raced away down the slope for all he was worth.
It was fairly steep, the ground being covered with loose stones,
some of which, displaced by the mule’s hoofs, rolled and clattered
downhill after him, and so frightened the animal that she
incontinently bolted. El Hakim’s whole energies were now
concentrated on keeping his seat, his rifle, and his presence of mind.
Just as he felt that he was gradually succeeding in getting his
agitated steed under control, she shied at a clump of cactus, and
shot him clean out of the saddle, and over the cactus, into the
clinging embrace of a well-developed wait-a-bit thorn which was
growing on the other side. When the men had finally cut him out, he
had quite given up the idea of shooting elephants that day, turning
his attention instead to his numerous abrasions. Besides, the
elephants were by that time miles away.
After the evening meal, when we generally sat in front of the
camp-fire smoking, George and I used, figuratively speaking, to sit at
the feet of El Hakim and listen for hours to his yarns of elephant-
hunting. It was very seldom we could get him to speak about his
experiences, but when in the mood to talk, his tales were well worth
listening to.
We had some hazy idea that elephants were shot at something
like a hundred yards’ range with a powerful large-bore rifle, which
mortally wounded them at the first discharge. Once I asked El
Hakim, off-hand, at what range he generally killed his elephants.
“Oh,” he replied, “anything from five to twenty yards!” and went on
to explain that it was much safer to shoot big game at short range.
“Always stalk your beast carefully,” said he, “and get close enough
to be certain of your shot; then hit him hard in the right place, and
there you are!”
It certainly sounded very simple, and I must say that El Hakim puts
his own precepts into practice with conspicuous success; but a
beginner does not find it so very easy. The temptation to fire at say
eighty or a hundred yards, is well-nigh irresistible. It seems so much
safer, though in reality it is much more dangerous—a fact which is
rather difficult of assimilation by the novice.
“Besides,” El Hakim would remark in conclusion, with the air of
one propounding an unanswerable argument, “it is more
sportsmanlike.”
Another advantage of the short-range shot is this: Suppose a herd
of elephants is located. If the conditions of wind, etc., are favourable,
one can, with ordinary care, get right up to them, near enough to pick
out the finest pair of tusks, and drop their owner with a bullet through
the brain. If a ·303 is used there is no smoke, while it makes a
comparatively small report, which is most likely attributed by the rest
of the herd to the effect, and not the cause, of their comrade’s fall. A
second and even a third elephant can often be obtained under these
circumstances, before the herd realizes what is happening and
stampedes.
This rule of careful stalking till near enough to make the result of
the shot certain holds good with all big game, though there are
certain other factors to be considered, such as the angle to your line
of sight at which the beast aimed at is standing, and also light, etc.
One can go into any club or hotel billiard-room in those parts of
Africa where big game is to be found, and listen to conversation on,
say, lion-shooting. The chances are that nine out of ten men present
have “had a shot at a lion;” but only a very small percentage have
actually bagged their beast. In these days of small-bore, high-power
rifles, a man can shoot at a stray lion at six hundred yards, and he
may be lucky enough to wound it or even, perhaps, kill it; but surely
that is not “playing the game.”
On the afternoon of the day after the Somalis left for the Waso
Nyiro, N’Dominuki came into camp with a chief named “Karama,”
who wished to make “muma,” or blood-brotherhood, with me, to
which I consented. It was rather a long affair. They brought a sheep
with them, which was killed, and the liver cut out and toasted.
Karama and I then squatted on the ground facing each other, while
our men on the one side, and Karama’s friends on the other, formed
a circle round us. A spear and a rifle were then crossed over our
heads, and N’Dominuki, as master of the ceremonies, then took a
knife and sharpened it alternately on the spear-blade and the gun-
barrel, reciting the oath of “muma” meanwhile. It was a long,
rambling kind of oath, amounting in fact to an offensive and
defensive alliance, with divers pains and penalties attached, which
came into operation in the event of either or both the blood-brothers
breaking the said oath. At the conclusion of N’Dominuki’s speech the
assembled spectators shouted the words “Orioi muma” three times.
Three incisions were then made in my chest, just deep enough to
allow the blood to flow, and a similar operation was performed on
Karama. N’Dominuki then ordered the toasted sheep’s liver to be
brought, which, on its arrival, was cut into small pieces, and a piece
handed to both Karama and me. A further recitation of the penalties
of breaking the oath was made by N’Dominuki, and again the
spectators shouted “Orioi muma.” Karama and I then dipped our
pieces of liver in our own blood, and amid breathless silence
exchanged pieces and devoured them. This was repeated three
times to the accompaniment of renewed shouts from the spectators.
The remainder of the liver was then handed round to the witnesses,
who ate it, and the ceremony was concluded, it only remaining for
me to make my new blood-brother a present.
The next morning our final preparations were completed, and
N’Dominuki having come over early, we turned all the animals we
were leaving behind over to him. He bade us adieu, with a wish that
we might return safe and sound, and, what is more, he sincerely
meant what he said.
After leaving our late camp we plunged once again into the thorn
forest, which we soon crossed, emerging into the sparsely vegetated
highland I have mentioned before as extending to the northward.
The sun was very hot, and travelling slow and laborious, not so
much from the nature of the ground, perhaps, as from the soft
condition of the men after their long rest. The ground, nevertheless,
made walking a wearisome task, as the loose pebbles and quartz
blocks turned our ankles and bruised our shins.
FOOTNOTES:
[7] “Elephant Hunting in East Equatorial Africa,” by Arthur H.
Neumann (1898), p. 126.
CHAPTER IX.
JOURNEY DOWN THE WASO NYIRO.