Hellmueller, L. C., & Aeschbacher, N. (2010) .

Centre for the Study of Communication and Culture
Volume 29 (2010) No. 4
IN THIS
ISSUE
Media and Celebrity:

Production and Consumption of
“Well-Knownness”
Lea C. Hellmueller and Nina Aeschbacher
Fulbright Researcher University of Fribourg-Freiburg
University of Missouri, Columbia
A QUARTERLY REVIEW OF COMMUNICATION RESEARCH
ISSN: 0144-4646
Table of Contents
Communication Research Trends
Media and Celebrity: Volume 29 (2010) Number 4
Production And Consumption of “Well-Knownness” http://cscc.scu.edu
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Published four times a year by the Centre for the Study of
A. Section outline of this review . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Communication and Culture (CSCC), sponsored by the
2. Historical Approach: From Alexander the Great California Province of the Society of Jesus.
to Reality TV Celebrities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Copyright 2010. ISSN 0144-4646
A. The historical origin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
B. The birth of celebrity journalism . . . . . . . . . . 6 Editor: Emile McAnany
3. The (Mass) Media’s Role in Creating Fame . . . . 9 Editor emeritus: William E. Biernatzki, S.J.
A. Relationship between paparazzi, Managing Editor: Paul A. Soukup, S.J.
Celebrities and their followers . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1. Battles for visibility and control . . . . . . . .12 Subscription:
B. Reality TV: Construction and Annual subscription (Vol. 29) US$50
deconstruction of fame . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
1. Altered (perception of) Celebrity Payment by check, MasterCard, Visa or US$ preferred.
value through Reality TV . . . . . . . . . . . . .13 For payments by MasterCard or Visa, send full account
2. Reality TV production from an number, expiration date, name on account, and signature.
economic perspective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
3. Balance of power between Reality TV Checks and/or International Money Orders (drawn on
and its participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 USA banks; for non-USA banks, add $10 for handling)
4. Media coverage of should be made payable to Communication Research
Reality TV participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16 Trends and sent to the managing editor
C. Interplay between mass and social media Paul A. Soukup, S.J.
communication channels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16 Communication Department
1. The place of social media in the traditional Santa Clara University
media’s landscape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17 500 El Camino Real
2. Celebrities’ use of social media . . . . . . . . .18 Santa Clara, CA 95053 USA
3. Fame through social media and user-
generated content . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19 Transfer by wire: Contact the managing editor. Add $10
4. Interaction between Audience, Celebrities, for handling.
and Media . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21
A. The position of the audience in the celebrity Address all correspondence to the managing editor at the
cultural industry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21 address shown above.
B. The Audience as a Consumer, Producer, and Tel: +1-408-554-5498
Promoter of Mediated Celebrity Content . . .22 Fax: +1-408-554-4913
C. Relationship between Celebrities and their email: [email protected]
Audience through Online Media . . . . . . . . . .23
5. From the Celebrities’ Point of View: The Centre for the Study of Communication and Culture
Case Study of Switzerland’s Beauty Queens . . . .24 (CSCC) is an international service of the Society of Jesus
6. Research Prospective for Media Celebrity established in 1977 and currently managed by the
Scholars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26 California Province of the Society of Jesus, P.O. Box 519,
Los Gatos, CA 95031-0519.
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28
Additional Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .32
Book Reviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35
2 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

Media and Celebrity: Production and
Consumption of “Well-Knownness”
Lea C. Hellmueller and Nina Aeschbacher
[email protected] [email protected]
1. Introduction
“Two centuries ago when a great man appeared, 1962, 1972), is only one type of contemporary celebri-
people looked for God’s purpose in him; today we look ty status. Ascribed celebrity, on the other hand, is the
for his press agent” (Boorstin, 1972, p. 45). Daniel celebrity of biological descent whereas achieved
Boorstin (1962, 1972) pointed out how much of our celebrity is the celebrity of accomplishments–that is,
thinking about human greatness has changed since individuals who possess rare talents or skills. However,
Shakespeare divided great individuals into three class- mass media may play a stronger role in the creation of
es: Those who had greatness thrust upon them, those Celebrities than assumed by Rojek (2001). To give an
who achieved greatness, and those born great example, not all players who are merely drafted into the
(Boorstin, 1972, p. 45). Within the last century, National Football League (i.e., achieved celebrity status
processes by which Celebrities can be manufactured through talent and skills) receive the same attention in
have been established. (The term celebrity is multifac- society because they do not receive the same attributed
eted and has changed its meaning over time. Within celebrity status by the media. Therefore, the representa-
this essay, the term can either refer to the actual human tion in the media and the public’s attention to it mainly
being represented by the term or to the tradable com- influences the process of contemporary celebrity cre-
modity that a celebrity generates or to the theoretical ation (Bell, 2009, p. 3). Hence, the media maintain the
concept, Bell, 2009, p. 1. To avoid confusion, we will intersection between achieved and attributed celebrity
capitalize the human being represented by the term, status. They can decide whether someone who embod-
i.e., “Celebrity.”) In fact, since the birth of mass com- ies talent and skills is newsworthy or not and thus high-
mercial culture, a society-wide system that supports the ly contribute to their celebrity status in society. Due to
creation of Celebrities has been in place (Gamson, the emerging omnipresence of created celebrity status
1992). Therefore, Boorstin (1972) defines a Celebrity (e.g., media can create a celebrity), this review primari-
(i.e., the human person) as a “human pseudo-event,” ly concerns itself with this type of celebrity and its inter-
that is a product of manufacture—a creation—rather sections with achieved celebrity.
than the result of merit. It is particularly important to highlight the
The media play a crucial role in that creation of celebrity industry on a space and time perspective, as
Celebrities: They provide visibility and a distribution these two components intertwine and provide the driv-
channel of Celebrities’ activities, which contribute to ing forces for change in the celebrity system. During
their well-knownness in society. In the democracy of the mass communication culture’s early years, each
pseudo-events, everyone can become a Celebrity by celebrity sector was largely concentrated in a special
getting into the media’s spotlight and by staying there location (i.e., Nashville’s country music made it
(Gamson, 1992; Ponce de Leon, 2002; Boorstin, 1972). famous; public art celebrities did so for Seattle; film for
Rojek (2001) argues that the “human pseudo-event,” Los Angeles, and so on). Due to technological process-
that is attributed celebrity as a concentrated representa- es, the celebrity industry has evolved into a stage of
tion of an individual as newsworthy (e.g., Boorstin, decentralization. Not only has celebrity manufacturing
moved into sectors beyond entertainment (e.g., sports,
Authors note: The authors would like to thank Prof. politics, and business), but Celebrities also do not
Louis Bosshart for his support, feedback, and contri- remain in one sector (e.g., movie actor Ronald Reagan
butions to this essay. was elected governor of California in 1966 and presi-
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 3

dent of the United States in 1980; bodybuilder and well established. Thus, we will use the particular term
action star Arnold Schwarzenegger became governor for the medium such as Internet. As we will, however,
of California in 2003). In terms of time, the celebrity make use of the term social media, we opted to use
industry constitutes a growth industry: each year more Kaplan and Haenlein’s (2010) definition which states,
people become involved in producing Celebrities; “Social Media is a group of Internet-based applica-
more institutions use them to create jobs such as travel tions that build on the ideological and technological
experts, whose whole function is to smooth foundations of Web 2.0, and that allow the creation
Celebrities’ movements through airports (Rein, Kotler, and exchange of User Generated Content” (p. 61).
& Stoller, 1997, p. 41) or the appearance industry (i.e., Consequently, social networking sites, blogs, and
costumers, cosmeticians, hairstylists) whose job is to “content communities” like YouTube can all be sub-
satisfy a competitive market environment that has sumed under this term (Kaplan & Haenlein, 2010, p.
fueled a race in all sectors to look younger and to bet- 62). Further, Reality TV emerged in the last 20 years
ter match the appearance requirements of their sectors as an important distributor and creator of Celebrities.
(Rein, Kotler, & Stoller, 1997). By reviewing past academic research about Reality
Nowadays, U.S. popular culture tends to highly TV, Mielich (1996) detects some discord about which
influence the global Celebrity market. Economic inter- formats researchers can subsume under that term (p.
ests drive boosting this global appeal. Celebrity pro- 6). In this context Hill (2005) emphasizes the transi-
vides an alternative way to increase revenues in an tional nature of this TV genre and its variety of for-
international market. But using various Western mats, which constantly change and find enhancement
Celebrities for that purpose has not always been suc- in new programs (p. 41). Nonetheless, we find specif-
cessful because consumers grow up in a particular cul- ic characteristics associated with Reality TV, namely
ture and inherit particular cultural values, beliefs, and “non-professional actors,” “unscripted dialogue,”
processes of perception. In fact, research shows that “surveillance footage,” and “hand-held cameras”
consumers respond to advertising messages congruent (Hill, 2005, p. 41).
with their culture and with people who reflect its values
(e.g., Paek, 2005). In a cultural context, a Celebrity A. Section outline of this review
always functions as a cultural hero, and individuals con- This research and literature review will start with
sume a particular form of celebrity culture as a way to a historical approach to provide an overview of how
be informed, entertained, and included in their cultural the concept of celebrity was altered into a mass prod-
community (Hofstede, 1991; Paek, 2005; Ting-Toomey, uct around 1900. Fame and public prominence trans-
& Chung, 2005). By “hero” we refer to a person who ferred from an aristocratic social status symbol into
possesses characteristics that serve as role models and manufactured mass products that become accessible to
are highly prized within a particular society (Paek, the masses through the media. Because the media play
2005; de Mooij, 1998). In studying Celebrity and a crucial role in creating fame, in a third section we will
media, one has to take into account the cultural context therefore look at the interactions between media (i.e.,
in which the data are collected, as Celebrities typically its industry), Celebrities, and the audience. After pro-
embody characteristics praised within one society or viding an overview on how the paparazzi business
within a particular culture (e.g., Western culture). closely relates to the celebrity industry and how jour-
In reviewing research in the field of media and nalists select Celebrities for news stories, we will dis-
Celebrities, we must first specify the terms we use to cuss the extent to which Reality TV, whose participants
explicate the concepts. We use the term mass media to are also often on the paparazzi’s radar, participates in
describe media organizations that transmit information the construction and deconstruction of Celebrities’
to a dispersed public, such as news portals on the fame. As the use of social media increases among tra-
Internet, newspapers, television, radio, and magazines. ditional media outlets (e.g., newspapers), Celebrities,
Furthermore, we use the term online to refer to infor- and the audience, we will elaborate their significance
mation that people receive through the Internet. We for the contemporary celebrity discussion.
will avoid the term new media as we agree with Most of the literature reviewed here deals with
Shoemaker & Vos (2009) that the term is misleading research done in the U.S. However, we will integrate
with regards to the Internet, which made its appear- German literature as well as a case study from
ance as a serious news medium in 1990 and is now Switzerland in order to foster an understanding of cul-

tural differences within celebrity production and repro- Professor Louis Bosshart from the University of
duction and to further the knowledge of how globaliza- Fribourg (Switzerland) will discuss the results of qual-
tion success still heavily depends on glocalization, itative surveys conducted with beauty queens from
which is the adaption of a global product into a local Switzerland in order to investigate benefits and draw-
market (e.g., Rao, 2010). In particular, in a last section, backs of fame.
2. Historical Approach: From Alexander the Great to Reality TV Celebrities
Celebrities, stars, heroes, and famous and promi- a visual timeline. Writing about historical origins poses
nent people refer to persons that stand out from the its challenges as it always refers to a particular culture,
mass. Due to their visibility, nowadays achieved a particular point of view. Different scholars discussed
through the mass media, they become well known by a the roots of the concept (Inglis 2010; Bell, 2009;
dispersed public. Because people use a variety of terms Gamson, 1992; Boorstin, 1972) from various angles.
to describe the visibility of these people, this creates For example, Boorstin (1972) focused on the graphic
difficulties in conceptualizing and defining these revolution, the revolution of the image, whereas
terms. Many of those meanings overlap even though Gamson (1992) focused on celebrity in 20th-century
they first occurred as autonomous words. “It is not pos- America. The interaction between celebrity, culture,
sible to locate a set of coherent criteria against which and technological progress is dynamic and can alter the
these terms are used, nor is it possible to use them concept of celebrity. Not only today, but also from an
objectively” (Holmes & Redmond, 2006, p. 9). Seifert historical perspective, change matters and has altered
(2010) states that the concepts of stars, Celebrities, and the concept of celebrity in various ways. How that
prominent people are social constructs, which are high- meaning transformation came about and how it affect-
ly complex phenomena, influenced by various forces ed celebrity culture and society will form a part of fur-
defining them (p. 38). This essay particularly deals ther investigation.
with the origin of the word celebrity and its transfor-
A. The historical origin
mation and will mainly focus on that by taking on
Rojek’s (2001) categories of celebrity (ascribed, The first really famous man in Europe’s history
attributed, and achieved celebrity). Without doubt, the was Herostratos. To make sure that his fellows and
concept of celebrity relates to other forms of becoming generations to come would remember him he set the
visible, like fame, notoriety, power, and elite status. famous temple of Artemis in Ephesus on fire. That was
But they are not interchangeable concepts. in 356 B.C. Now, more than 2,000 years later one has
In order to understand the emergence of the cul- to admit that, in this regard, he certainly succeeded.
tural meaning attached to the term celebrity, we have to A millennium ago, a title such as monarch or
delve deeper into historical dimensions. This will allow one’s status as a warrior formed one of the best ways
for a better understanding of how those terms have to become a Celebrity. Some of the first Celebrities
undergone and still undergo constant meaning changes were, in fact, winners in the ancient Olympic Games
because of cultural and technological developments (BBC News, April 4, 2003). They won the right to life-
(Seifert, 2010, p. 38). The history of celebrity ultimate- long free meals, and poets would advertise their fame
ly deals with the history of individuals (Giles, 2000, p. by hymns of praise. In fact, in the era of ancient Rome,
12). In his dissertation, Bell (2009) argues that one of the cities advertised their most famous inhabitants by
the hallmarks of contemporary society consists in the imprinting their faces on coins as a mark of immortal-
shift from a collectivistic to an individualistic society, ity. Known as the “first famous person,” Alexander the
from a “we-society” to a “me-society.” Culture and Great received celebration for his conquests. The
technology also combine to produce celebrity (Inglis, Roman era acknowledged for the first time that it could
2010), and the historical approach will thus manifest bestow civic honors upon even those who were not
the origins of modern celebrity. In order to have a bet- born into nobility (Giles, 2000, p. 15). Julius Caesar
ter understanding of when the concept of celebrity first became the first Roman to appear on a coin while still
attracted human attention, this section will also provide alive. Later, the gladiators achieved fame during the

Roman era and many celebrated them for their skills in of their beauty, their spirit, or their relationship to high
the bloodthirsty contests that attracted thousands of society. Madame Recamier provides one example. She
spectators (BBC News, April 4, 2003). lived in Paris about the middle of the 17th century and
As a matter of fact, the word origin of celebrity was known as “a distinguished lady of rank . . . whose
has its roots in the language of the ancient Roman civ- wit and success in society gave her more lasting dis-
ilization, deriving from the Latin word celeber, mean- tinction than her title and high position” (Maceuen,
ing “crowded, frequented, or populous.” It makes ref- 1874, p. 125). At the age of 16, she married a rich
erence to the Latin word inclytus mostly pertaining to banker and became known as a queen of fashion and
things, and seldom as belonging to persons, except in beauty. Whenever she appeared in society, she found
poetry (Von Doederlein, 1841, p. 35). The Handbook herself surrounded, admired, and loved (p. 128).
of Latin Synonyms (Von Doederlein, 1841) mentions Furthermore, another group of Celebrities consisted of
clarus, illustris, and nobilis as synonyms for celeber. poets, as the era considered poetry as the melody of the
Clarus means renowned for eminent services to one’s mind (p. 197). The biography of John Milton, a British
country; illustris, renowned for rank and virtues; and poet, includes a discussion as an example of how the
nobilis, as the belonging to a family whose members power of an author “extends beyond giving instructions
have already been invested with the honors of the or mere pleasure, that his thoughts may become the
state (p. 35). means of inciting thoughts in others, and that his ideas,
We can track the first appearance of the word without being copied, may be reproduced under various
“celebrity” in a dictionary back to 1612. The word orig- forms, time and again, by thinkers in other countries or
inally referred to “a solemn rite or ceremony, a celebra- ages” (Maceuen, 1874, p. 201).
tion” (Oxford English Dictionary Online, 2010). The To summarize, the Roman “fame through action,”
condition of being famous was the main meaning of the the Christian “fame of the spirit,” or the literary “fame
word (i.e., the condition of being much extolled or talked of the wise” came originally to those with the power to
about; famousness, notoriety). At the beginning of the control their audiences and their images, often political
19th century, leading writers in the U.S. began to pro- and religious elites (Gamson, 1992, pp. 2). The rise of
mote the concept of fame, thanks to copper engraving new technologies of communication gradually
and to the printing press that enabled extensive dissemi- detached fame and public prominence from an aristo-
nation of images of individual faces (Bell, 2009, p. 99). cratic social status and transferred it into a product
While Benjamin Franklin promoted the self-made man accessible to the masses. A new mass market in faces
in American society, Jean-Jacques Rousseau promoted and reputation marked the ending point of fame as the
fame for naturalness and inner qualities, in Europe. validation of a class distinction. Boorstin (1972) criti-
In the 19th century, the contemporary meaning of cizes the shift of our admiration to a focus on synthet-
a famous person emerged. Nowadays the particular ic products that are manufactured (p. 47). Further, he
meaning of the word is still that of a “person of celebri- states, “the qualities which now commonly make a man
ty, a celebrated person: a public character” (Oxford or a woman into a nationally advertised brand are in
English Dictionary Online, 2010). One of the oldest fact a new category of human emptiness” (Boorstin,
books on Celebrities dates back to the 19th century, to 1972, p. 49). Celebrity, he argues, has become in a
1874, when the meaning of celebrity became personal- modern sense a “human pseudo-event” fabricated on
ized. Written by Malcolm Maceuen and entitled purpose to satisfy our exaggerated expectations of
Celebrities, it serves as an excellent example of how human greatness. The Graphic Revolution he refers to
people use the word “celebrity” during this year and is the revolution of visuals. In other words, the emer-
before. The book consists of a collection of stories of gence of photography in post Civil-War America led to
Celebrities. Celebrities of this time period involved an explosive growth in such mass publications as
political persons—one chapter, for example, is devoted newspapers and magazines: The circulation of daily
to Cardinal Richelieu, a Prime Minister of France papers increased by 400% between 1870 and 1900
known for his intelligence and energy (pp. 5-49). (Ponce de Leon, 2002).
Moreover, people also celebrated saints as Celebrities,
because of their evident good lives, their observance of B. The birth of celebrity journalism
rites and ceremonies, and their intellectual spirit. Other The introduction of yellow journalism in the last
Celebrities were people admired and celebrated because quarter of the 19th century made stories about people a

central feature of journalism. Images, no longer only celebrity as a person “known for his well-knownness”
available to those who could paint or engrave, became (p. 57). In the 1950s, Celebrity began to show its use-
accessible for everyone through photography. fulness not only to selling and business, but sales in
Thus, we can trace the origin of celebrity journal- turn created Celebrities by selling them as a business
ism to the mid-19th century. The reporting that makes itself (Gamson, 1992, p. 14), which led into a culture
up the genre, however, did not mature until the 20th obsessed with celebrity news.
century mainly because change within journalistic rou- Celebrity journalism transformed itself into a
tines never occurs very fast nor very easily. In fact, the communication industry—an image industry where,
newspapers’ and magazines’ producers that wanted to for example, Bill Gates, CEO of Microsoft, through his
meet the needs of new kinds of readers had to increase commitment to high visibility, assembles different
their commitment to the publication of feature stories. experts to take advantage of the opportunities offered
Ponce de Leon (2002) argues that a turning point by the celebrity industry. In some ways, his celebrity
occurred in 1880, when journalists began crafting new helps the marketing of Microsoft products. Within the
techniques for depicting Celebrities. But it still took 40 celebrity industry—the collection of people, materials,
years for the new representational mold to find a place. and processes that together produce an output that has
The mission of celebrity journalism around 1900 con- value to the market (Rein, Kotler, & Stoller, 1997, p.
sisted of the illumination and exposure of the subject’s 30)—this part of the communication industry (i.e.,
real self (Ponce de Leon, 2002, p. 7). Ponce de Leon celebrity journalism) plays a crucial role because it dis-
comes to the conclusion that with a few notable excep- tributes the celebrity product and, with rare exceptions,
tions, celebrity journalism has not fundamentally we know Celebrity entirely through the media today.
altered its mission since its maturation around 1900. Celebrity journalism therefore has shifted into new
“The discourse of true success, with its emphasis on technical ways of distribution to satisfy the celebrity
self-expression and the accompanying belief that the industry’s needs: for example live-telephone chat, call-
real faces of the stars are revealed in private, is still a in shows, infotainment TV venues, or twittering.
fundamental tenet of celebrity journalism” (Snyder, Celebrities who understand the logic of the industry
2003, p. 446). Forces beyond human control can thwart have tremendous advantages over those who do not.
lives. In that sense, celebrity journalism raised the The omnipresence of Celebrities in the communication
awareness that even millionaires can have unhappy industry calls for a closer examination of the latter by
love lives. Human-interest journalism advanced the working out which specific role(s) they inherit within
tendency to judge Celebrities and the rich more by their celebrity culture in general.
lives at home than by their power to sway public events As the meaning of celebrity will redefine itself in
(Snyder, 2003). By the 1920s the Celebrities in popular a quickly changing world, we will discuss the contem-
magazines represented those of consumption (enter- porary meaning of celebrity in relation to their markets
tainment, sport) rather than production (business, natu- and media in more depth in Section 3. Nevertheless, to
ral sciences). Other important advancements for the summarize historical changes that led to the celebrity
concept of celebrity included the boom in literacy and culture we witness today, the time line in Table 1 will
the growth of over 23 million new immigrants entering provide an overview of how the concept of celebrity
the U.S. and bringing with them new markets (Bell, has transformed from an aristocratic good into a mass
2009, p. 101). The structure of U.S. society changed in manufactured product along with a secularization of
1920 largely due to this boom of immigration. society. One problem with presenting a time line of the
The television industry altered the celebrity cul- history of celebrity stems from the fact that the trans-
ture yet again by providing every household with formation has not reached its end yet. We still experi-
celebrity news, bringing the news into individual hous- ence fundamental change, as for example through the
es, whereas before people had to leave their house to rise of social media which leads to a highly heteroge-
see Celebrities. Right from its initial boom, television neous concept of contemporary celebrity culture.
has provided the most significant new outlet for image Looking at contemporary celebrity phenomenon such
creation. The accompanying economic push created a as American Idol, Bell (2009) argues that at the
new world of fame where people became known for extreme end achievement and celebrity are inversely
who they are rather than for their actions. Boorstin proportional. That is, Celebrities can be manufactured
(1972) describes this change with a new approach to without any personal achievement involved. Therefore

this time line tries to integrate the idea of fame as a outcome or precondition of fame. Because this review
product of Celebrities, to highlight what they are particularly looks at media and Celebrity, change with-
known for. This is not an easy task, however. The con- in the media industry will provide the focus. Moreover,
cept of celebrity clearly overlaps with the concept of this time line is not exhaustive. Rather it provides a
fame and with the motor of change in society. way to conceptualize the history of celebrity to aid in
Nevertheless, they are not interchangeable. understanding contemporary celebrity culture by inte-
Table 1 outlines the differences between the grating different research results (e.g., Riley, 2010;
Celebrity and fame (the derivation of greatness, the Bell, 2009; BBC News, April 4, 2003; 2004; Gamson,
achievement) and the change in society that serves as 1992; Boorstin, 1972).
Time Period Celebrity Fame and Change in Society

Thousands of years ago Monarchs, warriors Impact on lives of others
ancient Greece, Rome Olympic winners victory life-long free meals
340 BCE Alexander the Great Acknowledgement Dissemination of images
44 BCE Julius Caesar appeared on coin in his lifetime Featured in sculpture or coingage
Roman era Gladiators Fame despite bad reputation Thousands of spectators
16th century Queen Elizabeth I Status of royalty Theatre as mass entertainment
18th century Jean Jacques Rousseau Philosopher Egalitarian version of fame
1776 Benjamin Franklin First international Celebrity International attention
1833 New York Sun First penny paper Introduction of penny paper
Samuel Warren and
1860 Creation of idea of privacy law Attention to privacy rights
Lewis Brandeis
Stars give their images to promote
1893 Lilly Langtry Appears on soap package
products
1890-1920 Mass press, leisure time
1929 The Oscars Academy Awards begin Film achievement
Marlene Dietrich, Studio system,
1930-1940 Glamor of actors
Greta Garbo publicity machines
Post World War II Advent of television
1959 Federico Fellini Created “paparazzi” Era of celebrity photography
Celebrity as an academic
1961 Daniel Boorstin Academic study of celebrity
phenomenon
1968 Andy Warhol (artist) “15 minutes of fame” Sets tone for an era
1973 An American Family Reality TV starts Documenting ordinary family
1981 MTV Music television begins Celebrity enters homes
Draws attention to Ethiopian Using celebrity status to aid
1984 Bob Geldof
famine victims fundraising
1986 Rupert Murdoch Fox Broadcasting Company Confessional TV begins
1986 Oprah Winfrey Confessional TV nationally
First Reality TV with staged
1992 The Real World Celebrity as a recycling product
setting
2004 Mark Zuckerberg Facebook Advent of social networks
2009 Twitter Plane lands in Hudson River Celebrity and higher immediacy
2010 Facebook 500 million users Access to Celebrity’s profiles
Table 1. Origin and transformation of the Celebrity concept

3. The (Mass) Media’s Role in Creating Fame
Without the (mass) media’s supplying the public ty of the ordinary, what Turner (2010b) names “the
with information about Celebrities, recipients would demotic turn” (p. 2). In this context he also highlights
have no awareness of their existence (Hollander, 2010, the active involvement of the media machinery: “The
p. 150; Schierl, 2007b). From the media’s standpoint, most important development, in my view, is the scale
“celebrity” has nowadays become a precious econom- with which the media has begun to produce celebrity
ic good, because the demand for such content has grad- ‘on its own’” (p. 156). With these changing develop-
ually but consistently increased (Schierl, 2007a, p. 7). ments, we can no longer consider the media only as
News and entertainment media, for example, gos- “mediators” or “translators” of cultural identity but
sip magazines such as InTouch, People, or US Weekly also as “authors” that produce their own texts (p. 159).
and blogs like TMZ, feature an abundance of Celebrity Aside from Celebrities who are well-established
pictures and video footage that render celebrities visi- through other channels (e.g., sports or music), televi-
ble for a wide audience. Visibility, according to Rein, sion’s production itself keeps on growing, introducing
Kotler, and Stoller (1997) is vital for a Celebrity (p. 7). and selling its own Celebrities through different TV
However, they also highlight the drawbacks that can programs such as Reality TV (Turner, 2006, p. 156-
come with high visibility: “Becoming visible means 157). We will discuss Reality TV’s role concerning the
that the media will not only glorify acts but also mag- construction and deconstruction of fame, as well as the
nify sins” (p. 3). In the case of Celebrity gossip this profitability and sustainability of its “self-produced”
results in catching celebrities on tape/camera not only celebrities later in this section. Furthermore, in the face
when they make a glamorous appearance on the red of emerging trends on the Internet, a new, not to be
carpet, but also when they display deviant behavior neglected force in the context of celebrity culture has
(e.g., Britney Spears spontaneously shaving her head at recently further enhanced the traditional mass media
a hairdresser’s). On one hand, paparazzi serve the landscape: social media.
accumulative demand for such pictures. On the other In any discussion of contemporary celebrity cul-
hand, the audience itself participates increasingly ture, the media play an important, but not the only role
actively in the production of the celebrities’ visibility, that we must take into account. The paparazzi have
as pictures and videos can nowadays be taken easily become one of the biggest occupational groups that
from various devices (e.g., mobile phones) and then contribute to Celebrity visibility. The subsequent sec-
spread in a matter of minutes. tion will therefore elaborate their significance for the
Pictures that get published in the media show a contemporary media and celebrity culture, as well as
wide range of Celebrities. How did these people the relationship between paparazzi, Celebrities, and
acquire fame and thus celebrity status? Schierl (2007b) their followers.
argues that the media today have altered their selection
A. Relationship between paparazzi, Celebrities,
criteria concerning the people they prominently cover
because the demand for Celebrity content has and their followers
increased. Consequently, traditional sectors of society, Both the general public and journalists consistent-
like politics or the arts, can not provide a “sufficient” ly view paparazzi as more negatively than other groups
number of famous people anymore for the media’s cov- of photographers, denigrating them as the “worst of
erage (p. 103-104). Holmes (2010) emphasizes the rise worst” (Mendelson, 2007, p. 169). We can best define a
of “ordinary” people in the media landscape because paparazzo nowadays as a “freelance photographer who
their appearances symbolize the significant change that aggressively pursues celebrities in order to take candid,
has occurred in celebrity culture (p. 74). Turner (2006) often compromising photographs of them for publica-
characterizes this change as a shift “from the elite to tion” (Gold, 2001, p. 111). They are often criticized
the ordinary,” which has especially taken place in because of their overaggressive search of an unexpect-
today’s television and Internet content production (p. ed picture of a Celebrity. The word paparazzi comes
154). This shift results in an increasing media visibili- from an Italian word for “buzzing insects” and first

appeared in La Dolce Vita, a film by the Italian film- With the rise of violent encounters between
maker Federico Fellini as the name borne by one of the Celebrities and the paparazzi, the California legislature
characters in the movie. Fellini chose this name for the enacted an “anti-paparazzi statue” in 1997 and amend-
most prominent of the Celebrity-hounding freelance ed it in 2006. The law allows Celebrities to recover
photographers who haunted cafes on the Via Veneto in punitive damages against trespassers and to compel
hopes of catching some movie star in some ridiculous them to forfeit all funds earned from such reporting;
behavior or abusive consumption of alcohol (Gold, they may also prevent photographers from climbing
2001, p. 111). The question remains, though, of how fences and chasing limousines (Willis, 2008, p. 176).
Fellini chose the name. Fellini, who died in 1993, never Nevertheless, Willis (2008) concedes that no state law
publicly mentioned how he came up with the name. prohibits the paparazzi from snapping pictures of
However, Fellini was quoted as stating that he chose Celebrities in public places. Because the freedom of the
this name because it was the name of one of his child- press holds a landmark position in the United States
hood friends, who liked to imitate the buzzing sounds of constitutional system, people refrain from going so far
pesky insects (Gold, 2001, p. 112). Though there are as to preventing media outlets from publishing photo-
number of theories about the name Paparazzo, Fellini graphs of Celebrities. Another important point in the
may be the only person to know the original meaning of debate arises from the fact that the courts usually con-
the word. sider Celebrities as public figures who have essentially
These days, scholars distinguish between waived their right to privacy. That is because their tal-
paparazzi and traditional photojournalists by the fact ents attract public debate and commentary, and photo-
that the former focus on Celebrities rather than on war graphs taken in public places cannot fall subject to pri-
or politics or people caught up in current events, and vacy claims (Willis, 2008, p. 179). However, we should
the fact that financial gain drives their motivation more bear in mind that balancing rights to privacy with the
than social responsibility (Mendelson, 2007). If “jour- competing right to freedom of expression is contextual
nalism is the business or practice of producing and dis- and cultural. Different judges come to different conclu-
seminating information about contemporary affairs of sions. To give but one example, Princess Caroline of
general public interest and importance” (Schudson, Monaco found judges of German Federal Constitu-
2003, p. 11), should we then consider paparazzi as tional Court unsympathetic to her claims for breach of
journalists because they produce information about privacy (Brüggemeier, Colombi Cracchi, & O’Callag-
contemporary celebrities of general public interest and han, 2010, p. 34). Princess Caroline filed a series of
importance? The answer to this question remains the civil law suits against publishers in Germany because
subject of an ongoing debate and heavily depends on of paparazzi photographs of the Princess taken without
an in-depth investigation on how to define “general her consent. But the Court defined her as an absolute
public interest” and “importance” as these two ele- person of contemporary society and therefore denied
ments of Schudson’s definition are rather vague crite- the validity of her claim. But the chamber of the
ria and would need further explanation. The term Strasbourg Court, the European Court of Human
paparazzi became (in)famous as an impingement on Rights (ECHR) decided that the restricted protection of
right of privacy. It all escalated in the death of Princess the privacy of public figures by German law infringes
Diana. The ambivalent position of the paparazzi on Art 8(1) ECHR, which states that all persons have
became the most discussed topic surrounding her death the right to respect for their private and family life,
and some hints appeared in the news coverage that the their home, and their correspondence (Brüggemeier,
paparazzi borne some responsibility (Mendelson, Colombi Cracchi, & O’Callaghan, 2010, p. 36). The
2007; Smolla, 1998). But, as Smolla (1998) argues, if judges in Strasbourg chose the opposite argument from
the paparazzi killed Diana, they also made her, and we the German courts.
as the public make the paparazzi. All three arguments Even though, many people perceive paparazzi as
are oversimplified. As a matter of fact, none exists the worst of the worst who often go on trial, the num-
without the others. But, nowadays, the Hollywood ber of paparazzi has not dropped but rather increased.
news media have become more aggressive and com- What motivates the paparazzi to live such a stalking
bative than ever. In order to earn substantial income, life? Of course, money plays a central role. A single
they constantly follow Celebrities around town, lurking photo can sell from anywhere between $6,000 to
for best selling photograph. $100,000 and some estimate that a paparazzo can earn

up to one million dollars a year (Howe, 2005, p. 32). ing; here we must reconsider media education issues
And, driven by money within a market-driven media in order to balance voyeurism and newsworthiness.
system, it seems logical that as long as readers are will- This is because we can define the interdependency
ing to pay to see these pictures, editors will continue to among the public, the media, and Celebrities as a mar-
support and pay paparazzi whatever they ask for to get ket of exchange where paparazzi exchange pictures for
their pictures published. Further, the Internet has money, Celebrities exchange visibility and privacy for
removed any waiting by the public for Celebrity pho- fame, the media industry exchanges information for
tos to become available. It has created a way for pic- attention and subscribers or followers, and the public
tures to appear in public in a matter of a second (Willis, exchanges attention and maybe money for access to
2008, p. 178). In this instance web publishers will pay Celebrities’ information to satisfy their need for
paparazzi for their photos to post them on their blogs or voyeurism. As long as the process of this market
websites. That adds another contemporary enticement remains viable and beneficial for the parties involved
that will not help to reduce the number of paparazzi. and as long as we consider that everyone involved acts
Celebrities, on the other hand, also depend on the to maximize their rational self-interest, paparazzi will
paparazzi to become famous, to get published, to not stop following celebrities, celebrities will not stop
involve their audience by encouraging their becoming exposing themselves to such intrusiveness, and media
fans and followers. The main concern of the Celebrities organization and the public will not stop buying these
stems from their charge that those who publish pictures or news items. On the other hand, Bourdieu’s
paparazzi photography have wrongfully appropriated (2005) field theory states that humans do not simply
their images. Hence, Mendelson (2007) argues that we act to maximize their rational self-interest. In fact, the
should view the issue of image for paparazzi and individual only acts as a social and collective actor;
Celebrities less through the lens of privacy than and thus one can only understand the dynamics in the
through an image control lens (p. 171). Celebrities also journalistic field by understanding the degree of
use their private lives to market themselves. The right autonomy of the field and within the field—for each of
image for them means that they gain more money and the actors. Bourdieu locates the journalistic field with-
attention from producers and scripts, larger salaries in the field of power, caught between cultural and eco-
because of greater ratings on TV (p. 172). Therefore, nomic power, with economic power generally retain-
they constantly safeguard their image, concerned to ing the upper hand. That may explain why some media
provide a coherent performance. The press considers outlets seem to remain immune to Celebrity pictures
Celebrities willing to present these private parts of their and have more autonomy to look behind the scenes
lives, and so it seems that one cannot hold to the priva- than other people-oriented magazines that can only
cy argument as the root of the problems. In fact, the survive by selling pictures of Celebrities. If we look at
control of these moments of privacy is at stake. the audience side, one of the major forces driving
Willis (2008), on the other hand, wants to balance voyeurism comes from our expectations and changing
the rights of press freedom with the rights of privacy of conception of what information should remain closed
Celebrities. This means the establishment through leg- and private and what information should become
islation of a “much needed buffer in which Celebrities available to the public. Calvert (2000) points out that
can more privately enjoy their lives” (p. 202). Such “as our expectations of privacy decrease, our expecta-
legislation would allow courts to hold that information tions for receiving more information—our expecta-
serving only to satisfy mere curiosity is not newswor- tions of what are public—increase” (p. 78).
thy and that no First Amendment protection should Particularly in a market-driven media system, the
apply to paparazzi who constantly exploit celebrity audiences’ demand for celebrity content can explain
images. Willis (2008) concludes that a “narrowly tai- the increasing market for celebrity photography.
lored rule can be drawn which would prevent publica- Because both scholars and practitioners consider the
tion of non-newsworthy . . . photographs while still audience an influential factor on media routines
allowing the media to report the last celebrity (Shoemaker & Vos, 2009), the audience has come to
romances, break-ups, and exploits” (p. 202). influence news content inasmuch as journalists devel-
If we look at the relationship between paparazzi op routines based on assumptions or institutional pre-
and Celebrities, we should also consider looking at the suppositionss about the consuming audience. To the
audience, who indirectly support that kind of report- extent that journalists believe audiences value drama

and human-interest stories, news content will feed that in fact no longer function as autonomous gatekeepers
need (Shoemaker & Vos, 2009, p. 54). and, although they may remain formally free of com-
Battles for visibility and control. How should jour- mercial culture producers, they institutionally depend
nalists determine the right thing to do? The argument on them: “Whereas the media guard the gates of expo-
that they should not cover Celebrities at all ignores the sure, the publicist guards the gates of access” (p. 89).
cultural and economic power Celebrities have in socie- These battles between publicists and journalists, but
ty. Another option presented by Mendelson (2008) also between paparazzi, journalists, and publicists con-
seems more reasonable: Mass media should cover the stitute an ongoing battle for autonomy and power—a
entertainment industry like any other powerful cultural war in an economy of information. Nevertheless, many
institution (like politics or industry), with celebrities as feel that this war needs some kind of guardian; it
the businesses, trying to present an image to the public should at least follow professional ethics and values in
to improve their salaries. Journalists should become order to maintain a professional relationship in a pro-
aware of the possibility of looking more deeply behind fessional news environment. But this professional rela-
the scenes, testing the stars’ images—using the same tionship once again faces challenges through new pow-
strategies as they use for politics and business institu- erful forms of celebrity diffusion such as Reality TV
tions (p. 178). formats, social media networks, or personal access to
The celebrity industry has become the scene of fans over Twitter.
constant battles for control and battles for visibility. A
staff writer for People magazine points out that B. Reality TV: Construction and deconstruction
of fame
It’s a very fine line we have to tread between
doing journalism and just being an outlet for The strong presence of Reality TV on television
whatever a Celebrity wants to say. It’s very hard and its role in celebrity culture makes it important to
to have any integrity and cover Hollywood, have a look at its origins. Following Hill’s (2005)
because so many people are trying to manipulate description of the characteristics often associated with
image. (Gamson, 1992, p. 85) Reality TV, namely “non-professional actors,”
There is a negative correlation between external influ- “unscripted dialogue,” “surveillance footage,” and
ences such as profit expectations and advertising con- “hand-held cameras” (p. 41), we find indications that
siderations, and professional autonomy (Hanitzsch, the starting point of Reality TV dates back decades.
2011). This correlation explains from the structure of Simon (2005) offers the instance of Allen Funt’s
the journalistic field how it has lost more and more of Candid Camera (debut, 1948), a show which secretly
its autonomy and, according to Bourdieu (2005, p. 42), taped normal people who unwittingly found them-
how this results from economic constraints and selves in a funny but real situation induced by the TV
increased audience research. When we look at con- producers (p. 180). Murray and Ouelette (2004) men-
straints of journalism, we see external forces dramati- tion the PBS program, An American Family (1973),
cally challenging the field of journalism and the pro- which documented and televised the life of the ordi-
fessional autonomy of celebrity journalists by the nary California family, the Louds. They note that many
power of other fields such as the entertainment indus- considered it as the first Reality TV program (p. 3). An
try or the advertising companies since media outlets American Family became very popular among
more and more depend on considerations of the market American audiences; ten million people watched it reg-
and advertising. Entertainment media become less ularly during its broadcast (PBS, n.d.). MTV’s The
powerful the more they depend on Celebrity images for Real World, which debuted in 1992, then introduced
sale; the more they depend on such images, the less new features, such as cast participants, a staged setting,
they retain control of making editorial evaluations and i.e. a house equipped with several cameras, and there-
determining content. Particularly in the area of celebri- by paved the way for a “new” Reality TV era with
ty reporting, the boundaries between PR and journal- shows like Survivor or Big Brother (Murray &
ism have become blurred and more and more Celebrity Ouelette, 2004, p. 3).
handlers use the relationship with the press for damage During its first season Big Brother in Germany
control. Often, publicists think of themselves as editors became one of the most popular television shows ever
and subsequently try to influence editorial decisions. to appear on German TV. Consequently, Big Brother
Gamson (1992) claims that most entertainment media fans were shocked when Zlatko Trpkovski, the show’s

most popular participant got evicted from the house. nition for past Reality TV contestants (e.g. from Big
The Reality TV participant became famous thanks to Brother), Cashmore (2006) notes “people who dis-
his lack of knowledge about high culture leading him played ignorance, dishonesty, or some kind of depravi-
to ask, for example, “Who was William Shakespeare?” ty became praiseworthy” (p. 189).
and thanks to his close friendship with roommate One trait that set Reality TV apart, though, comes
Jürgen. Shortly after the eviction his celebrity status from the heterogeneity of its subgenres (Murray &
further flourished. He produced his first record, Ouelette, 2004, p. 3-4). Consequently, Holmes (2010)
climbed to othe top of the singles charts, got his own draws attention to how the various formats encounter
TV show, and several times adorned the front page of the traditional myth of fame differently. Shows like Big
the German teenage magazine BRAVO. One of the lat- Brother induce the “demystification” of fame, as peo-
ter’s headlines then said “Zlatko: Star aus dem nichts” ple can become famous despite lacking “talent” and for
[“Zlatko, a star out of the blue”] (Nr. 24, 2000). Only displaying leisure time activities. On the other hand,
one year later, this same man got booed off of the TV Reality talent shows such as American Idol or X Factor
stage for his singing performance at the national con- and their most successful participants, e.g., Susan
test to represent Germany at the Eurovision Song Boyle in the UK, nourish the traditional beliefs that in
Contest. Zlatko’s former and “out of the blue” celebri- the end real talent will prevail (p. 73). Andrejevic
ty status had hit rock bottom. The former Big Brother (2004) points out that by publicly scouting for a new
contestant exemplifies the possibly accelerated rise and talent the “apparatus of celebrity production” becomes
fall of celebrities that have occurred since the format apparent. Shows like Making the Band, where profes-
successfully established itself on the television land- sionals (without the audience’s participation) decide on
scape. It also demonstrates that a normal and totally who suits a new music group best, contribute in some
unknown person can become widely known in a short ways to a “demystification” of Celebrity, because
period of time through a Reality TV show. Shows like aspiring artists are not (only) judged on the basis of
Big Brother stand as a landmark for the increasing their talent, but also on the extent to which they fit into
presence of ordinary people on TV or, as Kjus (2009) a foreseen marketing formula, that is, into the image of
calls it, for the “participatory turn” (p. 286). the new band (p. 5).
Altered (perception of) Celebrity value through Whether the audience or the industry profession-
Reality TV. In a survey among students (5th to 8th als make the final decision on the winner(s), all of the
grade) from Rochester, New York, Halpern (2007) aspiring Celebrities have to go through an extended
found that among those who watched at least five hours casting process, where the “professional side” sepa-
of TV per day, 29% of the boys and 37% of the girls rates the wheat from the chaff. Prior to auditions in
chose fame over intelligence as desired traits. front of the judges, a pre-casting that drastically mini-
Furthermore, 17% of all students questioned believed mizes the number of people for the televised casting
that most celebrities either owed their fame to “luck” or (Kjus, 2009, p. 185) takes place. The audience thus gets
to the “arbitrariness” of the media industry, which had a compressed insight on these casting try-outs. In a
the power to make them famous. Another study, con- case study of the Norwegian version of Idol, Kjus
ducted in 2006 in the UK, showed that one in six (2009) found that one in five of those people who made
teenagers (from age 16 to 19) envisions becoming it past the pre-casting were chosen because of their
famous one day and that 11% of the respondents were non-existent talent (p. 286). The casting footage that
“waiting to be discovered.” When asked what benefits gets aired on TV consequently does not only feature the
fame entails, 9% of the teens questioned found it “an very best but also the very worst: contestants missing
easy way of earning money without skills and qualifi- rhythm, lacking vocal talent, wearing crazy outfits,
cations” (LSC, 2006). On one hand, these survey exhibiting scary behavior, and oftentimes showing
results show that teens at least perceive celebrity status hubris. One example of such an aspiring singer,
as something desirable and within one’s reach. On the Menderes Bagci, tried out for the German version of
other hand, it indicates what skills teenagers ascribe to American Idol in 2002. After his “squeaky” musical
a part of today’s Celebrities. When considered in the interpretation of Usher’s U Remind Me, the judges
light of past and present Reality TV shows and their openly certified him fully absent of any singing talent.
participants, both of these findings do not surprise. Nevertheless, Menderes kept on attending the follow-
Rethinking what specific behavior had provided recog- ing season’s castings and receiving a devastating ver-

dict from the judges each time he showed up. Among sciously depend on the deliberations on who would be
the audience, Menderes acquired despite, or more like- suitable for the show or for TV in general (p. 59).
ly because of, his lack of talent, cult status. We should Consequently, we can only vote for those Big Brother
note here that, for each season Menderes returned, he contestants who actually made it through all the cast-
actually got admission to perform in front of the ings, that is, into the house. But production companies
judges, and not just at the pre-castings. Consequently, want the audience to believe that anyone could suc-
his returns culminated in continuous media visibility. cessfully be part of a Reality TV program (Turner,
He is not the first. Looking back in history, one woman, 2006). Televising auditions, where big crowds show up
Florence Foster Jenkins (1868-1944), also acquired to participate, connotes such a general accessibility to
cult status due to her earsplitting singing. The audience the competition and hints to the audience that they
loved listening in gloating joy to the musical perform- themselves might have a chance at fame. Turner (2006)
ances of the rich New York socialite and self-appoint- emphasizes that media industries primarily follow their
ed soprano singer, who herself though was not aware of own interests (p. 158). We therefore turn to the eco-
the audience’s mocking but ever more convinced of her nomic reward structures of the production of Reality
talent (Luehrs-Kaiser, 2008; Mischke, 2010). TV and its participants in the following section.
Cashmore (2006) argues that people take pleasure in Reality TV production from an economic perspec-
watching motivated ordinary people embarrass them- tive. Most Reality TV programs feature normal, non-
selves and get criticized by cynical judges (pp. 200- professional participants, who wish to get attention.
201). For Kjus (2009), such participants reinforce the Turner (2010a) therefore compares Reality TV and its
nature of the reality formats, which need winners as “ordinary” contestants who desire “celebrification”
well as losers (p. 286). In 2007, the audience’s ongoing with the economic process of demand and supply. The
Schadenfreude paid off for Menderes, as he received an ongoing success of Reality TV and its new formats
offer to perform live during one of the show’s finals, as results in an increased number of contestants needed
a “special guest.” He then performed a song (still with for these shows. Turner characterizes the supply and
his “squeaky” voice) in front of millions of TV specta- demand cycle in this regard as reciprocal and acceler-
tors. He owed the possibility to perform on stage more ated (p. 13). “The audience’s attention to itself”
to his general popularity among the audience than to (Collins, 2008, p. 89), which refers to the rise of reali-
any singing talent. In relation to American Idol, where ty shows and their featuring normal people wanting to
the audience has the final vote on who emerges as the participate in a program and to become well-known,
winner, Amegashie (2009) notes, “American Idol is a results in multi-layered economic benefits for the pro-
singing contest, but it sometimes runs the risk of ducers. On one hand, they can reduce spending as they
becoming a popularity contest” (p. 267). During the can forego hiring expensive professional actors and
preliminary rounds only the designated judges decide instead fall back on the “vast reservoir” of ordinary
about who can proceed to the next round, but after that people who wish to become Celebrities (p. 92.). On the
the voting remains wholly with the audience (p. 267). other hand, they can further engage those new
For Fairchild (2007), the involvement of the audience Celebrities, if promising, in subsequent programs. In
in finding a new Idol is one of the central elements that this context, Curnutt (2009) mentions MTV’s The Real
contribute to an economic success of the format and its World, which “reuses” its participants for spin-offs
winners. The interplay between the audience and their such as The Real World/Road Rules Challenge (p. 252).
“Idols” creates a feeling of togetherness that commits Various Reality TV formats have adapted the concept
the audience to the participants and vice versa (p. 372). of further marketing the most saleable participants.
Reichertz (2007) shares this view and argues that with Tiffany Pollard, better known as “New York,” provides
the jury-function of the public, the gap between the an example of someone who owed the launch of her
audience and the new “star” is shrinking, resulting in “own” TV shows, e.g. I Love New York, to her popu-
an approximation of the two (p. 94). larity among the TV audience after having participated
Notwithstanding that the audience indeed has the in VH1’s Flavor of Love (Campbell, Giannino, China,
possibility to affect the development of a show & Harris, 2008, p. 22).
(through different voting options), Kavka (2008) As Reality TV introduces a lot of prospective new
emphasizes the prevalence of casting choices. The lat- Celebrities, the economics of supply and demand means
ter precede the launch of the program and often con- that the permanence of their fame statuses gets chal-

lenged. In this context, Collins (2008) introduces the a contestant to independently benefit from his or her
term “dispensable” to highlight the instability and celebrity status because such clauses often bind people
unpredictability of a Celebrity’s status (p. 89). Because legally to the show’s production company/television
of the ever-changing presence of different new Reality network, which can prevent participants from being
TV Celebrities, their value fluctuates, depending on able to accept certain (lucrative) jobs (p. 98).
how they can legitimate their presence to the audience In the case of other reality formats, it is not only
and how the producers wish to place them in further the contracts that pose obstacles for the contestants to
engagements (Collins, personal communication, further develop their celebrity status. MTV’s The Real
September 2, 2010). According to Riley (2010), Reality World or Road Rules participants acquire lots of pub-
TV produces a lot of “instant Celebrities” whose fame licity while the show airs. Most often though, they can
status has only a temporary nature (pp. 297-298). not develop a career outside of the Reality TV busi-
Due to the imminent instability of their celebri- ness, since they became famous due to portraying their
ty statuses, the field for potential protagonists for “real” selves in front of the camera. In comparison with
Reality TV nowadays has become highly competitive. professional actors, they thus find it complicated to cul-
Aside from “ordinary” people who would like to have tivate a “public persona” detached from their TV
their television debut on a Reality TV format and appearance (Curnutt, 2009, p. 264). Susie Meister, a
alumni who want to get further airtime, the format former Road Rules participant confirms this assertion
itself also has focused on former stars or Celebrities by stating that aside from taking part in other MTV
who got famous outside of the Reality TV field. The shows, alumni of such programs have very constricted
economic benefit of promoting an already well- job opportunities. Some of them get assignments to do
known person seems obvious. The producers need not commercials or to endorse products, some may
take a chance on unknown talent or on an audience’s received requests to speak on campuses, or others may
fickle devotion. The success of The Osbournes in find work in association with travel agencies who hire
2002, which documented the life of former rock star them to attend certain holiday destinations to socialize
Ozzy Osbourne and his family, played a pioneering with teenage and young adult customers (Curnutt,
role in the future trend of the genre. Since then, many 2009, pp. 258-260).
new celebrity formats have emerged. To sum up the If a Reality TV show becomes successful and can
formats, the CBS network created the term “celebre- draw a large audience, it will also catch other media’s
ality.” The contemporary television landscape fea- attention. As Andrejevic (2004) points out, the Reality
tures a wide range of “celebreality” programs, for TV participants have gotten more and more aware of
example, celebrity talent shows like Dancing With the extensive financial benefits the production side
The Stars or Celebrities looking for a significant other reaps from these programs. They have tried to profit
as in Rock of Love (Waggenspack, 2010, pp. 254- likewise by pressuring producers. As the recruiting
256). Andrejevic (2004) argues that such shows fur- field for contestants is almost inexhaustible, the poten-
ther contribute to the “demystification” of celebrity, tial power of such pressure remains too low (p. 11).
as a celebrity reality show “offers to make real people Turner (2004) notes that the prospective Celebrities
out of stars,” whereas traditional reality shows prom- inherit a weak negotiation position, as they have to rely
ise the reverse (p. 10). on the show that made them visible to the audience in
Balance of power between Reality TV and its par- order to maintain their television presence and celebri-
ticipants. In what way can the participants benefit ty status (p. 54). In the case of MTV’s Jersey Shore, the
from their appearance and from prospective celebrity unequal balance of power has started to shift, though,
status? From an economic point of view, the benefits in favor of the cast’s side. In January 2010, news
Reality TV talent show contestants acquire seems reports and celebrity gossip sites announced that the
rather one sided. Franck and Nüesch (2007) describe original cast of this Reality TV show became dissatis-
this one-sidedness as followed: “Even though the win- fied with the network’s payment offer for taping a sec-
ners of Pop Idol enjoy enormous fame and publicity, ond season and demanded a higher wage. Although
financially they do not profit likewise” (p. 215). In this producers allegedly made threats to replace the cast
context Collins (2008) mentions the strict contractual members if they didn’t assent to the network’s offer
conditions to which Reality TV participants have to (Connelly, 2010), the cast and the producers came to an
comply. Some contract clauses make it impossible for agreement (Hibberd, 2010) and filming of Jersey

Shore’s season two took place with the same partici- successfully by obtaining further job offers (like Lisa
pants. Whoever profited from these wage negotiations Fitz who received an offer to star in a new fictional
at that time, in the end it paid to keep the same cast on series) after their appearance on the celebrity reality
the show, as the first episode of season two drew 5.3 show (p. 157 ff.). This study provides an indicator that
million viewers, three times the number of people who reality shows can offer a path but no guarantee to
watched the first episode of Jersey Shore’s first season become famous (again) for a longer period of time and
(Nakashima, 2010). Additionally, we can assume that that the media’s coverage of a person often attaches to
the media’s involvement in this dispute (by taking it up the Reality TV show itself rather than to the person.
in its agenda) might even have contributed to the Frank and Nüesch (2007) examined the media
increased number of viewers. sustainability of the top 10 American Idol contestants
Media coverage of Reality TV participants. Reality from the first three seasons by reviewing popular
TV and its participants provide profit not only for their tabloid and quality newspapers as well as music maga-
production companies, but also for gossip news media zines and press agencies’ articles (p. 217). They found
outlets. Turner (2010b) mentions the example of US that with the exception of Kelly Clarkson, who after the
and UK tabloid newspapers, which have to serve the show had several hit-albums and who managed to pro-
audience’s “hunger” for celebrity news. The continu- file herself as a “superstar” beyond the TV show, none
ously growing interest in celebrity news and gossip of the other 11 contestants of the first season managed
calls for a substantial amount of diverse coverage. to stay in the public’s eye. The study revealed a similar
Hence these newspapers rely on Reality TV formats result for the two subsequent American Idol seasons,
that present new contestants (prospective Celebrities) out of which only the winner and runner-up of season
whose stories they can mention in their editions (p. 34- two managed to prolong their presence on the media’s
35). To study the steadiness and continuity of the agenda (Franck & Nüesch. 2007, pp. 218-220).
media’s coverage of Reality TV participants, which These findings indicate that the general outlook
also includes the coverage after the airing of the show’s for an on-going celebrity status and consequently for a
final episode with these participants, researchers con- steady media coverage of a Reality TV alumni indeed
ducted several different content analyses, of which we remains rather gloomy. Collins (2008) describes a par-
will further present two here. ticipant’s most probable future after his or her “15 min-
Fröhlich, Johansson, and Siegert (2007) focused utes of fame” on Reality TV as follows: “Most of these
on the media’s coverage of the participants of the first Reality TV vets find that in the 16th minute, they are
season of Ich bin ein Star, holt mich hier raus! (the not absorbed into the celebrity system: rather, their
German version of I’m a celebrity, get me out of here!). celebrity currency runs out and they are channeled
They wanted to analyze the longevity of the partici- back into obscurity” (p. 89).
pants’ new celebrity statuses during and after the Can certain factors contribute to a prolongation of
episodes got screened. Although the contestants’ fame a Reality TV contestant’s media presence and thus
statuses underwent a short-term increase as they all got celebrity status? According to Collins (2008), a per-
extensive media coverage during the show’s airings, sonal scandal or high involvement with controversial
the researchers could not generally confirmed this on a sociopolitical issues offers a possibility to provide a
long-term basis and found that the status varied among (Reality TV) Celebrity with subsequent media cover-
those who participated, resulting in a subdivision of the age and visibility (p. 92). Out of the American Idol par-
participants into three groups: the “non-famous,” the ticipants from seasons one to three, there was one per-
“past-famous,” and the “starlets.” While the “non- son (Corey Clark), who got voted off early during sea-
famous” participants had either already passed their son two in 2003, but then temporarily got back on the
zenith of fame long before the show or had not yet media’s agenda in 2005, after he had falsely claimed to
achieved a recognizable celebrity-status at all, the have had an affair with Paula Abdul, one of the show’s
“past-famous” had recently had their fame-peak (like judges in 2003 (Franck & Nüesch, 2007, pp. 218-219).
Daniel Küblböck who came in third place in the
C. Interplay between mass and social media
German talent show Deutschland sucht den Superstar)
but were not able to prolong their statuses past their
communication channels
participation in Ich bin ein Star, holt mich hier raus! To attract the media’s attention, the Internet now
The “starlets” were the only ones to pursue their career offers an alternative: social media.

In fact, in 2009, GLM (Global Language Monitor) argue, the Internet and therefore social networks and
declared Twitter as the Top Word of 2009, as it was the blogs downsize the gatekeeping processes that exist in
most used term in print and digital media (Lea, 2009). other mass media forms (p. 55). This means that online
The microblogging service Twitter allows users to post information can spread unfiltered and thus does not rest
(status) updates of up to 140 characters in length on on strict framework conditions such as those on televi-
their profiles. If people don’t explicitly change the sion or in newspapers. This, however, remains subject
default settings, their posted tweets become accessible to an ongoing debate within research (e.g., Shoemaker
to the whole Twitter community. Furthermore, users & Vos, 2009). As a matter of fact, information posted
can follow (each other’s) profiles in order to see when on blogs is highly redundant and often could not have
someone posts a new update. The activity of following, been experienced first hand. In other words, informa-
though, does not necessarily need to be reciprocal tion may diffuse from mass media to the bloggers
(Jansen, Zhang, Sobel, & Chowdury, 2009, p. 217). because information travels through many gates and
Also in 2009, the New Oxford American channels. By arguing that blogging foretells the death
Dictionary declared unfriend (a term for removing a of gatekeeping theory one denies the fact that bloggers
friend from a social network’s friend list) as its Word of or online journalists themselves fit the definition of
the Year (Gross, 2009). These labelings indicate the gatekeepers. Nevertheless, thinking about gatekeeping
growth and emerging importance of social media and theory requires some revision of the original gatekeep-
its platforms for the contemporary media environment ing model for the 21st century (Shoemaker & Vos,
and, consequently, for society’s culture. One can access 2009, p. 129).
these platforms through different technological devices Sites that cover celebrity news rank, along with
such as laptops and mobile phones, which enable users political and technology blogs, among the currently
to access the platforms in order to update statuses or most popular. Murray (2009) ascribes a pioneering role
upload pictures independently of location. As the latter to the celebrity blog PerezHilton.com, whose success
circumstance fosters the fast spreading of new posts other celebrity gossip sites such as TMZ or JustJared
amongst friends, “followers,” and “anonymous” web (p. 33) soon followed. Mario Lavandeira launched
users, social network sites have emerged as an impor- PerezHilton.com in 2004 (originally named PageSix
tant source for the news media. The emergency landing SixSix.com). In 2009, for the third time in a row, Forbes
of a US Airways plane on the Hudson River in 2009 honored Perez Hilton, the self-appointed Queen of all
stands as a landmark in this development, as the first Media, as the most famous Web Celeb (Ewalt, 2010). It
news and pictures on the incident got posted on Twitter is important to note that the contemporary celebrity
by user Janis Krum. His posting then set off an online blog landscape appears well-differentiated. On one
avalanche of retweets, comments, and discussions. His hand, celebrity blogs inherit different organizational
photo of the plane floating on the river became widely structures; whereas individual bloggers lauched and
prominent on the web and even got posted on profes- own Dlisted or Pink Is The New Blog, TMZ, started as
sional news sites (Patalong, 2009). a joint venture by AOL and Telepicture Productions,
This popular Twitter picture and the follow-up remains corporate owned and managed (Burns, 2009,
news coverage indicate tendencies for networking p. 21). On the other hand, some blogs have set their
structures between the traditional media, social net- focal point on one specific area within the celebrity
works, and their users. How can we depict these ties? culture, e.g., Go Fug Yourself (fashion) or Babyrazzi
What impacts do social networks have on the media (relationships, parenthood, and Celebrities’ children).
landscape and on (the coverage of) Celebrities? How Their 24-7 accessibility, dynamic content, and
do the Celebrities react to the emergence of social immediacy generally set blogs apart from traditional
media and how can people aspiring to prominence ben- celebrity gossip in magazines or TV shows. As a con-
efit from the latter? sequence, most celebrity blogs become well-known for
The place of social media in the traditional media’s their topicality; they get updated several times a day or
landscape. Social media networks inherit at least one rather even shortly after a news story or a revealing
key attribute from the Internet: the open accessibility picture arises (Petersen, 2007). Tremayne (2007) high-
for all users. In theory, every person has the possibility lights the rapidity with which information provided on
to upload a video to YouTube, open a Twitter account, blogs spreads (p. x). In the case of Michael Jackson,
or write their own blog. As Drake and Miah (2010) TMZ published the very first message about his death

and served other news media as the primary source Celebrities’ use of social media. How do Celebrities
(Macnamara, 2010, p. 45). react to the increase of gossip blogs and news stories
These factors all contribute to celebrity blogs’ about them and the audience’s use of social media?
emergence as a serious competitor for other (celebri- Celebrities started to make use of their online plat-
ty) news media. Burns (2009) ascribes to blogs an forms, some of them very efficiently. Kwak, Lee, Park,
increasing agenda-setting function that has an effect and Moon (2010) indeed found Twitter profiles of
on mainstream news organizations and their featured Celebrities rapidly increasing in popularity. Studying
stories (p. 151). As exemplified by the story about the characteristics of this social network and its users,
Michael Jackson’s death, the latter use and quote they found that the top 40 profiles followed on Twitter
blogs in and for their own editions. An interesting by over a million people belonged either to a Celebrity,
study might elaborate the extent to which traditional a TV show, or another mass media institution, e.g., The
media such as newspapers, as well as their online Ellen DeGeneres Show or the The New York Times.
editions, make use of the news presented on celebri- Table 2 shows this same tendency for the most fol-
ty blogs, or vice versa. Most of the current studies lowed Twitter profiles in October of 2010. Apart from
that investigate the probable reciprocal impacts of President Barack Obama, all of the top 10 Twitter pro-
(citizen) blogs and traditional media outlets focus on files belong to Celebrities who have primarily gained
political issues, i.e. political blogs (e.g., Wallsten, their status through the media/entertainment industry.
2007; Meraz, 2009). The fact that an independent Muntean and Petersen (2009) examined the inter-
person/company or a big media company (such as play between today’s media and the tendency for
TMZ) can create different online celebrity blogs sug- Celebrities to use Twitter. Due to new technologies
gests that the difference between citizen and corpo- such as cell phone photos and videos and thus due to a
rate celebrity blogs might also provide a good topic variety of new communication channels that capture
for further development. celebrity news (e.g., blogs like TMZ), the discourse
As traditional media outlets have become well about Celebrities has evolved, as all these new chan-
aware of the increasing prevalence of online sources, nels contribute to the Celebrity’s public image. These
social media, and their quick pace of news dissemina- channels oftentimes focus on gossip and scandal sto-
tion, these traditional media now also follow this ries, so it became hard to keep a (famous) person’s
online trend by their own representation on the differ- image sacred and stable. Stars and Celebrities always
ent social network channels. US Weekly as well as The need to keep in mind the fact that anyone might capture
New York Times, for example, both have profiles on any deviant behavior by them and then publicize it in
Facebook and both have Twitter accounts. At the the media. Consequently, Celebrities themselves have
same time, blogs also make use of social networks by started using social media channels like Twitter in
a presence there as well. These developments point to order to guide how the various channels depict them
fluid boundaries and networking tendencies among and therefore how the media and the public perceive
the different (social) media channels. How this pres- them. For Murray (2009), Celebrities who self-publish
ence of the same brand (e.g., US Weekly) on different stories try to gain back the power they lost to the fast-
media channels appears provides yet another avenue paced gossip industry (p. 39). According to Muntean
for further research. Do they show the same informa- and Petersen (2009), direct blog and Twitter messages
tion or rather complement each other? This can mat- from stars and Celebrities inherit a key role in the flood
ter greatly for media outlets which have print versions of information sources, because audience members
as well as the online ones; why does the audience perceive these as the “authentic celebrity voice” and a
remain willing to buy a magazine that contains infor- “privileged channel to the star him/herself.” Therefore,
mation they could get faster and maybe even for free in a kind of full circle, the news media themselves
on the Internet? Studies which have focused on the makes use of these (online) first-hand footage/quota-
evolution of online news and/or on the relationship tions and publish them in various on- and offline media
between online and print versions of the same news channels. When Ashton Kutcher posted a picture of
outlets (e.g., Van der Wurff, Lauf, Balcytiene, Demi Moore’s backside on Twitter, the news media
Fortunati, Holmberg, Paulussen, et al., 2003; soon after picked up the “story” (e.g., Parker, 2009).
Franklin, 2008; ) can shed some light on the issue and Through presence on social media platforms,
offer help for possible future research in this field. stars and Celebrities attempt on the one hand to partic-

Rank Name (Twitter screen name) Followers Following Joined Twitter
1 Lady Gaga (ladygaga) 6,752,203 147,126 31 months ago
2 Britney Spears (britneyspears) 6,139,076 417,468 25months ago
3 Ashton Kutcher (aplusk) 5,926,756 612 21 months ago
4 Justin Bieber (justinbieber) 5,714,396 87,025 19 months ago
5 Barack Obama (BarackObama) 5,653,466 712,163 44 months ago
6 Ellen DeGeneres (TheEllenShow) 5,349,677 49,647 26 months ago
7 Kim Kardashian (KimKardashian) 5,080,319 94 19 months ago
8 Taylor Swift (taylorswift13) 4,414,166 48 23months ago
9 Oprah Winfrey (Oprah) 4,407,648 19 21 months ago
10 Katy Perry (katyperry) 4,268,730 63 20 months ago
Table 2. Ranking of the most followed Twitter profiles (Twitaholic, 2010)
ipate in the production of their image; on the other to the audience, without the interference of other mass
hand, they must remain present in these media in order media outlets (Marshall, 2010, p. 41). On the other
to stay on the media’s and consequently on the audi- hand, the audience members themselves have taken
ence’s agenda. According to Daschmann (2007), the more and more to present themselves online and on the
masses of (aspiring) Celebrities all have to compete for various platforms and have begun to produce their
the public’s (limited) attention (p. 186). In such a com- own content (Marshall, 2006, p. 638). Choi and Berger
petitive environment a famous person must therefore (2009) believe “that the global Internet has dramati-
remain present on all the accessible media channels cally magnified the global quest for fame and celebri-
(Seifert, 2010, p. 60). ty” (p. 194).
Fame through social media and user generated Posting self-made videos on MySpace and
content. Social networks do not only present an YouTube can provide an alternative way to gain a poten-
opportunity for the well-established, but also for the tial world-wide audience and to become famous. Bruce
aspiring Celebrities and ordinary people to participate Daisley (2010), head of YouTube UK, remains convinced
or to get themselves “out there.” Stefanone, Lackaff, that “if you’re good enough, YouTube’s users will make
and Rosen (2008) argue that in addition to Reality TV, you famous.” As an example of a person achieving fame
new online technologies like social networks have had and landing a record deal through a social media plat-
an influence on where the public locates itself within form, he mentions Justin Bieber, whose mother posted
the media system: “Rather than simply being the tar- videos of him singing on YouTube, which then got sev-
get of mediated messages, they can see themselves as eral million views and caught the attention of his first
protagonists of mediated narratives and can integrate manager, Scott Braun (Hampp, 2010). Although some
themselves into a complex media ecosystem” (p. 107). noticeable examples exist of people/artists making it
In this context Marshall (2010) highlights the chang- thanks to the presence on a social media platform, Totty
ing “face” of celebrity culture, which has been moving (2007) highlights the competition an aspiring online star
away from a pure representational towards a more pre- faces when trying to get famous online, e.g. on YouTube.
sentational system (p. 45). Due to social media plat- Not only must one appear among millions of other
forms like Twitter, Celebrities, on one hand, have videos, but the presence and popularity of the tradition-
started to present themselves in more unfiltered ways al media and their content on these sites complicate the

matter of someone unknown stepping into the online video might not be as amateurish (that is, the video
limelight. Kruitbosch and Nack (2008) also detected the appears as shot with a handheld camera) as it first
strong presence of professionally edited content on seemed, that it formed part of a marketing strategy to
YouTube. In their juxtaposition/analysis of the structure promote the song Forever, and that it consciously but
and the popularity of user-generated content (UGC) and indirectly fostered a more positive image of Chris
professionally edited videos, they found that user-gener- Brown (Feld, 2009). This case, disregarding whether or
ated videos were comparatively shorter than the ones not the video did in fact play part of a strategy, exem-
made by professionals. Although in numbers a lot of plifies the interdependence between media outlets, pub-
UGC appears on the website, they hardly (with a few licity machines, and promotions agencies, which now
exceptions) found themselves among the most viewed all take an active part in the contemporary media econ-
videos and generally got fewer clicks than the profes- omy (Turner, 2010a. p. 16). As suggested in the exam-
sional content (p. 8). ple, such shared spaces also bring up the question about
If a video on a social network can draw an the authenticity of the content provided on social media
immense online audience, mass media channels such platforms, as the latter remain available not only to the
as newspapers might notice it, take it up, and thus grant audience, but also to professionals. Consequently, it
the content further publicity. The involvement, i.e., the could be informative as well as revealing to get an
mediation and participation of the traditional media insight on how Celebrities and thus professionals make
becomes crucial, especially when a person tries to use of social media platforms as a part of their (viral)
obtain a celebrity status over a longer period of time marketing strategies. Turner (2010a), who calls for an
(Seifert, 2010, p. 62). Burgess and Green (2009) attest intensive investigation of the role/influence of publicity
to the traditional media gatekeeping function concern- agencies, argues that the latter oftentimes try to mask
ing the establishment of a Celebrity, as it validates the their actions. This thus complicates investigative and
latter’s success through its own acceptance, e.g., scholarly work (p. 16), as companies and their working
through a record deal (p. 24). methods seem shrouded by professional secrecy. In the
In YouTube’s history, a variety of videos, due to case of the “wedding dance” video, the agency GoViral
their online success, did get mentioned in other media at first had confirmed their involvement in a possible
channels. We will discuss one example, which illus- marketing strategy but later on distanced themselves
trates the process and its complexity. In 2009, the from their earlier statement (Feld, 2009).
YouTube video of marriage guests dancing at the A closer look at YouTube’s history indicates that
entrance to the church to the song Forever of Chris its users, the media, and the public seem to have
Brown got several million clicks in only a matter of become sensitized to the subject of authenticity of
days. Because of the fast growing number of views, this uploaded content. Burgess and Green (2009) mention
video and its protagonists caught the traditional media’s the example of Lonelygirl15 alias Bree (p. 27), whose
attention, and got featured in print and Internet news diary-style vlogs were presented as if the teenage girl
articles, as well as on TV shows. The popularity of the herself had produced them. A vlog is a video blog.
video resulted in increasing downloads of Chris Users produce these user-generated short videos by
Brown’s song (to which the wedding crowd entered the using various devices (e.g., web cams or cell phones),
church). Forever rose to the top of the iTunes sales list. and then place them on a social media platform such as
By posting a “click-to-buy ad” on the YouTube video YouTube (Molyneaux, O’Donnell, Gibson, & Singer,
itself Sony Music (the song’s publisher) fostered the 2008). In the case of Lonelygirl15, it turned out that the
song’s promotion and tied the social platform to a sales teenage girl in reality was a 20-year old actress and that
platform (Stone, 2009), resulting in an economic advan- two filmmakers, R. Flinders and M. Beckett, initiated
tage and positive publicity for the production company and authored these videos (Heffernan, & Zeller 2006).
and its artist. What makes this example even more Many of the vlog’s followers simply assumed the gen-
multi-faceted stems from the fact that before the video’s uineness of the videos, not realizing that they had tuned
success Chris Brown had tarnished his image because into fictional material. Such examples made the public
of his physical altercation with ex-girlfriend Rihanna more and more aware of questions surrounding the
(Caulfield, 2009). The video’s emerging just after the authenticity of presented content and even fostered
damage to the singer’s reputation threatened to have a “detective work” investigating which videos are “real”
harmful impact on his career spurred rumors that the and which are not (Burgess & Green, p. 29).

4. Interaction among Audience, Celebrities, and Media
Due to the ever-growing amount of media con- celebrity system and its economic power has always
tent, attracting a wide audience remains challenging. strongly relied on the audience’s involvement with it.
Generally, the media industry has to adapt to the con- Involvement includes investing and dedicating time in
ditions of the “Attention Economy,” where a surplus of Celebrities by writing fan mail or by becoming a mem-
“capital, labor information, and knowledge” results in ber of a fan club (p. 635). Writing fan mail and invest-
scarcity of available attention. Therefore, the latter ing time in a fan club imply the audience’s potential
becomes valuable all the more (Davenport & Beck, active role when it comes to supporting a Celebrity.
2001, p. 3; see also Franck, 1998). As an “earlier” This activity spectrum, through time, has undergone
example for strategies to grasp the audience’s attention, significant changes, resulting in further levels of
Davenport and Beck (2001) mention the emergence of engagement. Reality TV provides a good example for
“people” magazines, who started to use more and more the media industry’s counting on the involvement of
Celebrities as “vehicles of attention” in order to attract the public, by granting the audience an alleged say in
their readers (p. 106-107). who deserves gaining celebrity status, through letting
The aforementioned changes and tendencies in the audience vote for the best American Idol participant
the contemporary media landscape, as well as the mod- or against the least-liked Big Brother roommate.
ified ratio between Celebrities and the different media Furthermore, producers directly encourage the audi-
channels, urges a more detailed consideration of the ence to participate in their shows by promoting open
audience and the roles they play in relation to these casting calls for future shows. Interestingly, we can
developments. also trace this shift towards the audience’s participation
in shows that originally did not count (that strongly) on
A. The position of the audience in the celebrity the involvement of the public. We will therefore pres-
cultural industry ent two examples.
The audience’s consumption and reception sym- The audience of MTV’s The Real World original-
bolizes the necessary “fuel” to keep the economic ly did not have the possibility to choose who should
enterprise of celebrity going (Redmond & Holmes, become part of the cast. Then, for the 20th season, tak-
2007, p. 310). Outlining the interdependency between ing place in Hollywood, MTV introduced a new online
celebrity status and the audience, Wippersberg (2007) casting process through which Internet users could
emphasizes that a Celebrity can only become and decide on who should complete (along with the seven
remain a Celebrity if the audience embraces and thus people who the producers cast the “traditional” way)
perceives the individual Celebrity as a Celebrity (p. the show’s cast (MTV.com).
248). Seifert (2010) argues that although the media can In Switzerland, the televised election of the Miss
introduce and present potential new Celebrities to an Switzerland pageant underwent “democratization” in
audience, the consent of the audience remains essential 2005, when the public’s opinion received more weight
(p. 38). The “accepted” Celebrity thus marks the audi- than ever. Before, the audience had had only one out of
ence’s power position vis-à-vis the media industry, as nine votes that counted for the election of the next beau-
Celebrities symbolize the impersonation of the collec- ty queen. Nowadays, during the two preliminary rounds,
tive audience, on which the industry depends the public’s vote counts just as much as all the official
(Marshall, 2006, p. 636). Consequently, television judge’s votes together (resulting in a 50/50 ratio). Out of
shows and their casts depend on the endorsement of the top three contestants, it then becomes wholly up to
their viewers and gossip magazines, on their readership the audience to decide who they want to see as the new
to legitimize their position in the media landscape and Miss Switzerland (Bosshart & Witmer, 2007, p. 48).
to draw and maintain the advertising industries’ inter- According to Bosshart and Witmer (2007), the produc-
est. Therefore, the media count on the involvement of ers modified the participation mode in order to foster the
the public in order to financially sustain themselves. audience’s involvement and integration and to diminish
Marshall (2006) argues that the constitution of the possible gossip about unfair elections.

B. The audience as a consumer, producer, and consumption. When comparing readers and non-read-
promoter of mediated celebrity content ers of “people” magazines in terms of what gratifica-
tions they were expecting to obtain through using
The emergence of the Internet, including blogs
media/people magazines, they found, similar to the
and social networks, and the growing amount of (audi-
study of De Backer et al. (2007), that these magazine
ence-generated) celebrity media content (Marshall,
readers had a more distinct wish to learn something
2006, p. 634) brings up the question of the extent to
about Celebrities (p. 453).
which the audience participates in the consumption,
production, and promotion of this content. Due to the growing demand for celebrity content,
As a matter of fact, a study conducted in Belgium gossip media, whether published online or not, on one
showed that the consumption of certain media outlets hand counts on the contribution of professional
(newspapers, gossip magazines, and television) corre- reporters and paparazzi, but on the other hand also
lates positively with the interest in celebrity gossip, and counts on the ordinary public/audience for up-to-date
that younger people form the biggest consumers of this celebrity news, pictures, and videos. Blogs like
content (De Backer, Nelissen, Vyncke, Braeckman, & PerezHilton.com and TMZ provide information on their
McAndrew, 2007, 346). Furthermore, the results indi- front webpage about how to contact their staff in case
cate that the motives for consuming gossip differed their clientele sees, tapes, or photographs a Celebrity,
between younger and older respondents. Whereas or simply has a tip about a newsworthy celebrity story
Belgian adolescents seemed to show interest mainly in (e.g. www.tmz.com/tips). The easy transmission of pic-
glamorous international Celebrities who can “teach” tures through cell phones and other devices makes so-
them something (e.g., how to dress), young adults and called “citizen paparazzi” (Burns, 2009, p. 13) a not-to-
older people showed interest in Belgium Celebrities, be-neglected news source.
with whom, due to the geographical and linguistic prox- Lerman (2007) ascribes the evolution of the
imity, they could feel a certain connection (pp. 346-347). social media a meaningful role, as it stands for the
Interviewing both male and female readers of the growing participation of its users: “[U]sers are actively
tabloid newspapers The Sun and Mirror, Johansson creating, evaluating, and distributing information” (p.
(2006) noted that identification and distance at the 1). In 2006, Soukup conducted a study on fan websites
same time characterize the relationship of the readers dedicated to different Celebrities, analyzing their struc-
and the depicted Celebrities. On one hand, readers did tures and contents as well as contacting the producers
indeed feel empathy for Celebrities and their issues. On of such websites to examine what gratification they get
the other hand, the high economic wealth of some from hosting such a site (Soukup, 2006, p. 325). He
Celebrities kept the readers away from fully identifying concluded that the producers of these websites were
with them, at times even resulting in feelings of envy. active readers of and contributors to the production of
The interviews further showed that tabloids do fulfill a celebrity texts, by providing information, pictures as
social function, as their articles serve as “talking well as (alternative) interpretation of the Celebrity’s
points” for the interpersonal communication, for exam- works (p. 332). Furthermore, through forums and inter-
ple, between co-workers. Through discussion of the active features, other people/fans can take part in dis-
issues depicted in the coverage (e.g., a Celebrity cussions or provide and exchange other celebrity-relat-
betraying his/her partner), people negotiate or reinforce ed content. The interaction between people from all
social norms, activities which positively contribute to a over the world results in online communities, which
community building (p. 349-357). the producers of the websites perceive as gratifying (p.
Feasey (2008), who questioned female heat read- 326). We could therefore also view the audience as a
ers about their motivations to read celebrity gossip, promoter or processor of mediated (celebrity) content.
found that these women also took pleasure in talking to In a study of the most popular videos on
other people about celebrity gossip. Furthermore, it YouTube, Burgess and Green (2009) found that the
also often served them as a starting point for having a majority of the most viewed content came from tradi-
broader discussion (to which personal thoughts and tional media sources and showed an informational
experiences could then be added) about a certain topic, nature (that is, gossip stories or celebrity interviews).
as for example, romances or diets (p. 693). Non-professional users often uploaded the content,
Rössler and Veigl (2005) also detected a general originally produced by professionals, (p. 43-46). This
significance of a social interaction function of media illustrates how the audience, through social media,

substantially contributes to the dissemination of infor- stone, as she was the first person ever to receive over
mation and more specifically, of celebrity content. one billion views of her posted videos (dpa, 2010).
Other social media platforms like Facebook offer sim- According to Marshall (2010), the connection
ilar options for users to publish (celebrity) content or between the audience and their Celebrity has intensi-
communicate what content they find worth publishing fied through the “pathways” that social media offer.
and consequently making it “visible” for their Online media channels such as social networks pose
(online) friends. By clicking the “like”-button or the possibility for fans to get “directly” in contact with
direct (re-)posting, users can show to their friends a Celebrity. Through this channel the audience tries to
which pictures, status updates/stories, videos, or links get closer to the very reality of the Celebrities (p. 44).
(outside the Facebook community) they favor or what After analyzing different online fan clubs and celebrity
and who they would like to talk about. As a conse- websites, Théberge (2005) concluded that Internet fan
quence, the liked or published content reaches a wider clubs set a changing milestone for the relationship
audience and therefore obtains more publicity. The between Celebrities and their audience, as the latter
new people who then view the published content then becomes more and more reciprocal.
can ignore or spread it further or start an (online) dis- These changes pose important considerations for
cussion about it. Anschlusskommunikation, i.e., sub- the audience, Celebrities, and the theory of parasocial
sequent communication after the primary consump- interaction. Initial research showed parasocial interac-
tion (such as a discussion after having seen a TV tions as one-sided, quasi-interactions between viewer
show) ensures an augmentation of attention to the TV and media figure (Horton & Wohl, 1956). Parasocial
show and its cast (Böhme-Dürr, 2001, p. 13), which interaction in regard to Celebrities and fans originally
holds importance for the manifestation of celebrity appeared as a one-way relationship between the two.
status. If someone becomes a talking point for people, The fan feels an intimate but imagined closeness to his
the public level of awareness becomes bigger. This or her Celebrity (Stever, 2009, p. 4; for a closer exam-
awareness then results in enhanced celebrity ination of the concept of parasocial interaction see,
(Wippersberg, 2007, p. 257). e.g., Horton & Wohl, 1956; Giles, 2002). In addition to
the Horton and Wohl study of film actors, other
C. Relationship between Celebrities and their
research has detected parasocial relationships between
audience through online media viewers of certain television programs and their pro-
Most Celebrities, aware of the rising importance tagonists (Derrick, Gabriel & Hugenberg, 2009;
of social media (for their audience), now themselves Vorderer, 1996).
actively use these networks, by obtaining their own Nowadays when a fan can more easily to get “in
profiles and thus making information and content touch” with Celebrities (as fan mails don’t need to be
available to the social media community. It allows hand-written and sent though regular mail anymore), the
them to promote themselves and their “products” by development of parasocial relationships between the
directly communicating with their audience (Marshall, audience/fans and Celebrities is facilitated. The process
2010, p. 43). Hampp (2010) ascribes the rapidly rising also calls into question the one-way nature of parasocial
success of the singer Lady Gaga to her effective usage interaction because Celebrities, on the outer surface
of the social media channels, resulting in millions of seem to try to get more and more in contact with their
Facebook fans, Twitter followers, and views of her audiences. Researchers now raise the question of how
videos on YouTube (p. 42). Her Facebook page gets social media, i.e., social networks, have modified these
updated on a daily basis with private pictures, music parasocial interactions between the Celebrities and their
videos, and personal status messages. Fans comment audience. Marshall (2010) notes that the “new” paraso-
on her personal status messages and pictures to show cial connection between the two indeed gets challenged
their appreciation for the singer. When fans camped when skepticism about the authorship of status updates
outside of the Today Show venue the day before Lady or messages, written on a Celebrity profile, emerges (pp.
Gaga’s performance on the show in July, 2010, the 43-44). We should also take into account the fact that the
singer gratefully mentioned them in several of her online-connection on these networks can indeed remain
Facebook status updates (e.g., Lady Gaga, 2010). In one-way. Taking the example of Twitter, Kwak, Lee,
October 2010, the effectiveness of her social media use Park, and Moon (2010) found that the majority of the
got respectively validated. She set a YouTube mile- connections between two people (especially between a

Celebrity and a member of the public) were not recipro- page/blog (e.g., if they want to allow comments by fans
cal, meaning that a person who follows another person or not) indicate the continuous controlling position of
on Twitter is not necessarily followed back by the latter. the Celebrity in their relationship with their fans (Burns,
Table 2 on page 19 offers a similar finding: the most 2009, p. 60).
popular Celebrities on Twitter only follow back a small After reviewing the literature on the contempo-
segment of the profiles that follow them. For example, rary tendencies in the usage of the Internet and the
Kim Kardashian, who initially got famous through the social network environment in relation to Celebrity and
Reality TV show Keeping Up With The Kardashians, its audience, we find that researchers still need to have
has over six million followers. She, however, only fol- a closer look at the audience’s side, to elaborate how
lows less than 100 profiles. Celebrities thus decide on they perceive the presence of Celebrities online in gen-
whom they want to follow. The different options a eral and how this presence might have an effect, alter-
Celebrity can enable or disable on an Internet platform, ing the perception of the relationship between Cele-
like a social network profile or even their personal web- brities and their audience/fans.
5. From the Celebrities’ Point of View: Case Study of Switzerland’s Beauty Queens
by Prof. Louis Bosshart, University of Fribourg
Celebrity nowadays depends on the mass media The survey questions revolved around which role
and their capacity to generate big audiences. The mass the expectation of becoming a Celebrity played when
media, on the other side, depend on the presence of a the interviewees decided to participate in the pageant
Celebrity, which creates marketable news values. contest. What is their perception of “becoming or
These news values provide so much profit that many being a Celebrity?” Is celebrity a value in itself? What
mass media outlets started to create Celebrities them- are the benefits and drawbacks of being a Celebrity, in
selves. One specific way to create Celebrities while the professional as well as in the private sphere? How
simultaneously ensuring the interest of other media lies much ambition or even narcissism does it take to main-
in organizing beauty contests. The tremendous success tain a celebrity status? What kind of sacrifices are the
of beauty contests led to an inflationary creation of contestants willing to accept? Furthermore, the women
contests of this kind. To name a few Swiss examples: also had the possibility, if they wished, to write down
Miss Molly (contestants who weigh more than 170 additional thoughts on the topic of celebrity that
pounds), Miss Handicap, Miss Teenie, Miss Earth seemed of note.
Switzerland, and Miss Altersheim (women who are In response to the question about their reasons or
older than 70 years and are still able to walk on stage motives to participate in a pageant contest, the beauty
without any help). queens stated:
What does the chance of becoming a Celebrity
• “At first I wanted to take the chances that come
mean to young women who submit an application form
with participating in a pageant contest. At that
to participate in a beauty contest? And, after having
time I did not even realize that this chance had a
gone through an extensive selection and evaluation
side effect, called ‘celebrity’.”
process, what does it mean to become a famous wide-
• “I saw it as a nice opportunity and sort of a fun
ly known beauty queen? We transformed these
experience.”
research questions into interview questions. We then
• “It was like applying for a job that would offer me
interviewed six Swiss beauty queens—who all won
financial independence and a sort of an adven-
beauty pageants between 2004 and 2009. We focused
ture.”
on two pageants, Miss Bern and Miss Switzerland,
• “It was something new, unknown, and provided
because they have taken place for more than a decade
the opportunity to make some extra money. I did
and therefore are well known. We sent the question-
not take the aspect of celebrity into consideration,
naires to the beauty queens who completed them
at least not well enough.”
between 2008 and 2009.

The answers indicate that most of the women sonalities must become reduced to simply labeled per-
interviewed did not primarily sign up for the contest in sons to fit in coherent stereotypes and/or clichés.
order to become a Celebrity. These beauty queens want- In other words, Celebrities receive an image that
ed to become successful in their respective fields and does not necessarily correspond with their real charac-
wanted to get access to interesting, well paid jobs (espe- ters. Furthermore, discrepancies between the mass-
cially as fashion models). They primarily took the pag- mediated public image of Celebrities and their private
eant contest as a kind of assessment, which would allow behavior create news values, i.e., marketable informa-
them to get a professional evaluation (on their looks and tion for the media. For the beauty queens we inter-
abilities), as well as providing a fun experience. viewed this can entail consequences they do not like.
What consequences obtain for young women They may not fit the public image all the time. This
(aged between 18 and 24) acquiring celebrity statuses? does not have to result in schizophrenia, but the dis-
On the positive side, they enjoy a tremendous amount of crepancy between what they are and what they are
privilege: complementary holidays in fancy hotels and expected to be puts quite some pressure on them.
sea cruises, discounts for a variety of goods, and many Sometimes they thus prefer to say nothing in order not
invitations and front row seats at various events (sports, to destroy their public image or not to disappoint the
fashion-shows, movies). Celebrity can thus function as a (erroneous) expectations of the audience. This reaction
virtual door opener, providing access to a big (lucrative) has not only to do with the clear cut image the media
social network. On the negative side, celebrity status build, but also with the glamorous world of the
results in the loss of privacy. Celebrities become a part Celebrities they report.
of the public sphere and therefore public interest. As a The beauty queens are conscious about this
result, people touch them physically, randomly speak to reduction of complexity:
them on the street, ask for autographs, call them by their • “You get a very specific image.”
first names, and take pictures with electronic devices • “The media define a certain image and you have—
(e.g., cell phones) without asking for permission. strategically spoken—to correspond with this
The beauty queens indicate that the fact Celebrities image.”
lose their status as anonymous, private persons seems
the biggest burden that comes with such a status: To sum up: celebrity provides social capital,
which improves chances and success in professional
• “Celebrity gives me a stronger position in my job, careers in a significant way, but this social capital does
better payments, and more chances for promising not come without any extra costs. These costs have to
jobs. On the other hand, me and my private (love) be paid with private capital. The wish to become a
life are under permanent observation, e.g., when I well-known and successful “participant” in the world
go shopping.” of show business ranked high among our sample.
• “People would like to cut a piece out of my life. “Show business” for beauty queens means activities
There is no distance anymore. I have better access that guarantee a minimum of public acceptance and
to many resources but at the same time lost my appreciation. As a consequence, many of them became
anonymity and I have to fight constantly against and still perform as actresses, singers, models,
prejudices (which stem from media’s coverage).” announcers, promoters, DJs, or journalists.
• “I do earn quite some money but I pay for it with Being a Celebrity improves the chances of becom-
the loss of anonymity!” ing and remaining successful. But it has its price. To say
In terms of how beauty queens see the role of it with the help of a metaphor: Celebrity has in its two
mass media in the construction and deconstruction of a hands two double-edged swords or two coins with two
Celebrity, they make it clear that they see the mass different sides each. One sword represents the dichoto-
media as major players in the process of making my between being well known, successful, and famous
celebrity status possible. The media generate “well- on one hand, and the loss of privacy and unlimited pub-
knownness” not only to promote Celebrities, but also to lic exposure on the other hand. The second sword rep-
financially benefit themselves from this business. The resents the media, which grant Celebrities access to the
triple concert of models-markets-media creates a prof- public sphere while simultaneously constructing a spe-
itable win-win situation. The problem with the media— cific image of that Celebrity. These often over-simpli-
from the Celebrities’ point of view—lies in the fact that fied images then have an important influence on how
they reduce complexity. Rich, multi-dimensional per- audiences see and decode Celebrities.

Are there ways to limit the negative consequences tive fields. Then they become successful in a certain
that can come with being a Celebrity and therefore way and all of a sudden have to ask themselves: What
being at the center of public interest? More than half of price for a successful professional career (that may also
the interviewed beauty queens mentioned Roger grant celebrity status), and how much am I willing to
Federer as a (Swiss) role model for someone who has pay for it? As long as the investment proves profitable,
solved the problem of success and modesty, of recon- these young women will continue investing, well
ciling intimacy and distance. On one hand, he is a well- aware of the fact that celebrity works a good currency
known, well earning, highly successful tennis player; in the market of show business. Investing means not
on the other hand he is still the sympathetic, nice, and only accepting the loss of privacy but also showing
quiet “boy next door.” And that highlights the very ambition, energy, endurance, and the elaboration of
problem of beauty queens in Switzerland: they start as well-defined strategies; this sums up the ambivalence
pretty normal people with some talent in their respec- of celebrity.
6. Research Prospectives for Media Celebrity Scholars
“[M]edia exposure is the oxygen that sustains the own way to the celebrity industry by providing plat-
contemporary Celebrity” (Drake & Miah, 2010, p. 55). forms where individuals or corporations can promote
But, that describes only one side of the contemporary Celebrities, by letting Celebrities communicate direct-
celebrity culture. Today, the media play an important ly with their audience, and/or by providing content for
role within the celebrity industry, but other forces of the traditional media industry.
power also work to regulate that relationship between Furthermore, we should note that the three main
media and Celebrities. According to Rein, Kotler, and elements reviewed in this essay, celebrity, media, and
Stoller (1997, p. 42) the celebrity business merged into the audience, connect somewhat to each other in a tri-
a celebrity industry, where a wide range of different but adic way. They all depend on but also benefit from
related industries have become involved in the produc- each other (see Wippersberg, 2007) in order to “func-
tion and consumption process of the celebrity industry. tion” adequately. Therefore we added a triangle that
We can define an industry “a collection of people, links the three elements to each other. Past studies have
materials, equipment, and processes that collectively indicated which fields were and should be further
produce an output that has values to the market” (p. investigated (e.g., how the audience finds pleasure in
30). The celebrity industry needs specialists who man- consuming celebrity gossip). With new elements like
age their clients’ rise to high visibility. Acknowledging social media coming into play, questions on their role
the developments media and technology have under- in the triadic relationship between media, Celebrities,
gone and the change in contemporary celebrity culture, and audience arise in themselves but also in terms of
we have enhanced and modified the Rein, Kotler, and the entire celebrity industry.
Stoller (1997) model of the celebrity industry (p. 42). The entertainment industry plays an important
Figure 1 outlines a summary of our literature review role by producing entertainment and entertainers. The
that we integrated into our conceptualization of the celebrity industry uses such venues as baseball games
celebrity industry. Not every celebrity industry utilizes to remain in the media’s spotlight (e.g., by singing the
every sector, but it helps to understand why and how national anthem before the game). The representation
the field of contemporary celebrity must remain industry, on the other hand, organizes the busy sched-
extremely heterogeneous. By adding the audience as ule of Celebrities (e.g., a personal manager or per-
an industry, we acknowledge the involvement of the sonal assistant), or acts as promoters to arrange
audience in the consumption, production, and promo- events and to arrange publicity for their clients. The
tion of celebrity content. The audience’s willingness to publicity industry has a very close relationship to the
invest attention and money into the celebrity industry representation industry. This industry consists of pub-
is fundamental. Further, social media foster these lic relations specialists, the advertising market, and
activities of the audience, but also contribute in their marketing research specialists. They have the goal of

promoting visibility through the skillful generating of their interaction reduces the power of each by making
publicity (Rein, Kotler, & Stoller, 1998, p. 47). The them more dependent on each other.
appearance industry has become the fastest growing As Figure 1 indirectly indicates, various aspects
industry, because Celebrities have to manage their of the celebrity industry need further investigation.
appearance in order to gain publicity. Another indus- According to Turner (2010), we can approach and
try particularly important to support celebrities in define celebrity “as representation, as discourse, as an
their daily lives is the legal and business industry. industry, and as a cultural formation—and what kinds
Many Celebrities have “relinquished control over of research agendas or analytical approaches could
every conceivable facet of their financial lives” (p. flow from these definitions” (p. 13). He further states
54) and firms take responsibility to receive their that previous research has in particular focused o the
income, pay all their bills, etc. first two of the aforementioned categories (p. 14). To
Figure 1 highlights all these related industries and counter this imbalance and to focus more thoroughly
tries to provide an understanding of different powerful on the social and cultural significance of celebrity,
industries involved in the construction and consump- Turner (2010) has called for a closer examination of the
tion of Celebrities as a business. Such related industries industrial production and the audience’s consumption
can prove extremely challenging for the celebrity of celebrity, while embracing “[m]ulti-factoral, con-
industry as well as for the communication industry as junctural, and multi-disciplinary approaches” (p. 19).
Figure 1. The Contemporary Celebrity Industry (adapted from Rein, Kotler, & Stoller, 1997, p. 42).

Scholars should apply a rather macro-perspective We also see a need for more analysis of research
research on media and celebrity by not only investigat- on how social networks alter the relationship
ing the relationship between the media and the celebri- between Celebrities and their audience and how
ty industry, but by also taking into account how the immediacy affects and challenges the concept of
other (external) powers of related industries structure parasocial interaction.
that relationship. To conclude, the omnipresence of Celebrities and
Furthermore, to keep up with technology and its the “celebrification” tendencies affirms its significance
fast-developing communication channels, research for our society and simultaneously confirms the impor-
needs to follow up with these new trends as soon as tance of academic research about it that takes into
they occur. The fast-paced technology trends can pose account the heterogeneity of its origin and the indus-
problems in conducting well-founded research, as the tries involved in the production of celebrity status.
latter takes its time, while technology keeps on grow- Well-knowness is the test of celebrity. As Boorstin
ing incessantly. The amount of celebrity content has (1972) would say, “Anything that makes a well-known
risen immeasurably with the advent of social media, name still better known automatically raises its status
complicating the matter of getting an overall view of it. as a celebrity” (p. 58).
Even so, we would find it interesting to elaborate how
the general audience encounters this celebrity informa- References
tion flood (on all media channels) and to ask whether
Andrejevic, M. (2004). Reality TV: The work of being
and how they try to filter the content they want to con- watched. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
sume. This can also lead to an understanding concern- Publishers.
ing the self-perceived role of the audience within Amegashie, J. A. (2009). American Idol: Should it be a
celebrity culture as such. singing contest or a popularity contest? Journal of
With the rise of celebrity blogs as information Cultural Economics, 33(4), 265-277.
channels, researchers should test the gatekeeping BBC News (April 4, 2003). A brief history of celebrity.
model (Shoemaker & Vos, 2009) within celebrity jour- Retrieved October 16, 2010 from http://news.bbc
nalism. What forces are at work by gatekeeping .co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/1777554.stm.
celebrity news? How do traditional media and online Bell, C. E.(2009). American idolatry: Celebrity, commodity,
media differ in their way of selecting celebrity news and reality television. Unpublished Dissertation,
University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.
stories and sources? Following Boorstin’s (1962, 1972)
Böhme, K. Dürr. (2001). Die Währung “Aufmerksamkeit.”
idea of human pseudo-events, researchers should
In K. Böhme & K. Sudholt (Eds.), 100 Tage
empirically test how human pseudo-events outweigh Aufmerksamkeit: Das Zusammenspiel von Medien,
spontaneous events. A study that recently tested Menschen und Märkten bei »Big Brother« (pp. 11-33).
Boorstin’s concept of pseudo-evens in the Philippine Konstanz, Germany: UVK.
press within the news sector finds that his theory still Boorstin, D. J. (1962). The image: or what happened to the
holds true (Tandoc & Skoric, 2010). Institutional and American dream. New York: Atheneum.
organizational constraints make journalists valuable to Boorstin, D. J. (1972). The image: A guide to pseudo-events
“staged” events in news gathering, and reporting on in America. New York: Atheneum.
Celebrities can turn into a battle of control of the pub- Bosshart, L., & Witmer, C. (2007). Die Wahl der Miss
lic sphere, where the powerful industries or individuals Schweiz als Win-Win-Situation? In T. Schierl (Ed.),
may manage to manipulate the media (by taking power Prominenz in den Medien. Zur Genese und Verwertung
von Prominenten in Sport, Wirtschaft, und Kultur (pp.
over them) which indirectly leads to a manipulative
42- 59). Koeln: Halem Verlag.
reporting that in the end can affect audience’s percep-
Bourdieu, P. (2005). The political field, the social science
tion of the celebrity industry. Therefore a replication field, and the journalistic field. In R. Benson & E.
study should test how the journalism industry weighs Neveu (Eds.) Bourdieu and the journalistic field (pp.
human spontaneous events in relation to human pseu- 29-47). Malden, MA: Polity.
do-events when they report about Celebrities and how Brüggemeier, G., Colombi Ciacchi, A., & O’Callaghan, P.
that affects their reporting. This study could then also (Eds.). (2010). Personality rights in European tort
expand to include a trend analysis of how celebrity law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
coverage in terms of human pseudo-events has Burgess, J., & Green, J. (2009). YouTube: Online video and
changed by increasing in frequency. participatory culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

Burns, K. S. (2009). Celeb 2.0: How social media foster our Derrick, J. L., Gabriel, S., & Hugenberg, K. (2009). Social
fascination with popular culture. Santa Barbara, CA: surrogacy: How favored television programs provide
Praeger. the experience of belonging. Journal of Experimental
Calvert, C. (2000). Voyeur nation: Media, privacy, and peer- Social Psychology, 45(2), 352-362.
ing in modern culture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. dpa. (2010, October 2010). Lady Gaga schafft 1 Milliarde
Campbell, S. B., Giannino, S. S., China, C. R., Harris, C. S. YouTube-Abfrufe. dpa. Retrieved October 27, 2010
(2008). I love New York: Does New York love me? from http://www.focus.de/kultur/diverses/musik-lady-
Journal of International Women’s Studies, 10(2), 20-28. gaga-schafft-eine-milliarde-youtube-
Cashmore, E. (2006). Celebrity/Culture. New York: abrufe_aid_565747.html
Routledge. Drake, P., & Miah, A. (2010). The cultural politics of celebri-
Caulfield, K. (2009, July 30). YouTube wedding video sends ty. Cultural Politics, 6(1), 49-64.
Chris Brown to charts. Reuters. Retrieved November1, Ewalt, D. M. (2010, February 2). The Web Celeb 25.
2010 from http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE Forbes.com. Retrieved September 14, 2010 from
56S17Z20090730. http://www.forbes.com/2010/02/02/web-celebrities-
Celebrity. (n.d.). Oxford English Dictionary Online. Internet-thought-leaders-2010.html.
Retrieved July 13, 2010, from http://oed.com/. Fairchild, C. (2007). Building the authentic celebrity: The
Choi, C. J., & Berger, R. (2009). Ethics of global Internet, “Idol” phenomenon in the attention economy. Popular
community, and fame addiction. Journal of Business Music and Society, 30(3), 355-375.
Ethics, 85(2), 193-200. Feasey, R. (2008). Reading heat: The meanings and pleas-
Collins, S. (2008). Making the most out of 15 minutes. ures of star fashions and celebrity gossip. Continuum:
Television & New Media, 9(2), 87-110. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 22(5), 687-699.
Connelly, S. (2010, January 25). “Jersey Shore” stars Feld, T. (2009, November 3). Vife Trittbrettfahrer: Wie virale
demanding more money to appear on second season; Werbung in die Medien eindringt. NZZ Online.
MTV threatens to replace cast. NYdailynews.com. Retrieved October 14, 2010 from http://www.nzz.ch/
Retrieved October 14, 2010 from http://www.nydai- nachrichten/kultur/medien/vife_trittbret-
lynews.com/gossip/2010/01/25/2010-01- tfahrer_1.3962365.html
25_jersey_shore_stars_demanding_more_money_to_ Franck, G. (1998). Ökonomie der Aufmerksamkeit.
appear_on_second_season_mtv_threatens.html München: Carl Hanser Verlag.
Curnutt, H. (2009). “A fan crashing the party”: Exploring Franck, E., & Nüesch Stephan (2007). Avoiding “Star Wars”:
reality-celebrity in MTV’s Real World franchise. Celebrity creation as media strategy. KYKLOS, 60(2),
Television & New Media, 10(3), 251-266. 211-230.
Daisley, B. (2010, May 27). YouTube offers big followings Franklin, B. (2008). The future of newspapers. Journalism
for brands as well as teen pop stars. new media age. Studies, 9(5), 630-641.
Retrieved September 29, 2010 from http://www.nma Fröhlich, K., Johansson, H., & Siegert, G. (2007). Einmal
.co.uk/opinion/industry-opinion/youtube-offers-big- Star und zurück. Der Einfluss der Medien auf den
f o l l o w i n g s - f o r- b r a n d s - a s - w e l l - a s - t e e n - p o p - Produktlebenszyklus von Prominenz. In T. Schierl
stars/3013909.article. (Ed.). Prominenz in den Medien. Zur Genese und
Daschmann, G. (2007). Der Preis der Prominenz: Verwertung von Prominenten in Sport, Wirtschaft und
Medienpsychologische Überlegungen zu den Kultur (pp.142-163). Koeln, Germany: Halem Verlag.
Wirkungen von Medienberichterstattung auf die Gamson, J. (1992). The assembly line of greatness: Celebrity
dargestellten Akteure. In T. Schierl (Ed.), Prominenz in in twentieth-century America. Critical Studies in Mass
den Medien: Zur Genese und Verwertung von Communication, 9(1), 1-25.
Prominenten in Sport, Wirtschaft und Kultur (pp. 184- Giles, D. (2000). Illusions of immortality: A psychology of
211). Koeln: Halem Verlag. fame and celebrity. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The attention econ- Giles, D. (2002). Parasocial interaction: A review of litera-
omy: Understanding the new currency of business. ture and a model for future research. Media
Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Psychology, 4(3), 279-305.
De Backer, C. J., Nelissen, M., Vyncke, P., Braeckmann, J., & GLM (The Global Language Monitor). (2009, November
McAndrew, F. T. (2007). Celebrities: From teachers to 29). Top word of 2009: Twitter. Retrieved November
friends: A test of two hypotheses on the adaptiveness of 1, 2010 from http://www.languagemonitor.com/
celebrity gossip. Human Nature, 14(8), 334-354. news/top-words-of-2009/.
De Mooij, M. K. (1998). Global marketing and advertising. Gold, D. L. (2001). English paparazzo, Italian paparazzo =
Understanding cultural paradoxes. Thousand Oaks, Commonization of the charactonym Paparazzo (in
CA: Sage. Federico Fellini’s La Dolce Vita). Neophilologus, 85,
111-119.

Gross, D. (2009, November 17). Dictionary word of the Kavka, M. (2008). Reality television, affect, and intimacy:
year: ‘Unfriend.’ CNN.com. Retrieved August 3, 2010 Reality matters. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire,
from http://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/11/17 England: Palgrave Macmillan.
/unfriend.word/index.html. Kjus, Y. (2009). Idolizing and monetizing the public: The
Halpern, J. (2007). Fame junkies: The hidden truths behind production of celebrities and fans, representatives and
America’s favorite addiction. New York: Houghton citizens in reality TV. International Journal of
Mifflin Company. Communication, 3, 277-300.
Hampp, A. (2010). Gaga, oooh la la: Why the lady is the ulti- Kruitbosch, G., & Nack, F. (2008). Broadcast yourself on
mate social climber. Advertising Age, 81(8), 42-42. YouTube – really? In MM’08: Proceedings of the 2008
Hanitzsch, T. (2011). Populist disseminators, detached ACM International Conference on Multimedia, with
watchdogs, critical change agents, and opportunist co-located Symposium & Workshops (pp. 7-10).
facilitators: professional milieus, the journalistic field Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM Press.
and autonomy in 18 countries. The International Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is
Communication Gazette (forthcoming). Twitter, a social network or a news media? In WWW
Heffernan, V., & Zeller, T. (2006, September 12). “Lonely ’10: Proceedings of the 19th international conference
Girl” (and friends) just wanted movie deal. The New on World wide web (pp. 591-600), Raleigh, NC: ACM
York Times. Retrieved October 4, 2010 from Press.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/12/technology/12cn Lady Gaga. (2010, July 9). Thousands of precious lil mon-
d- lonely.html?_r=1&ei=5094&en=a56f0e777a707f56 sters are sleeping in street outside Today Show. May
&hp=&ex=1158120000&partner=homepage&page- NY watch over u, + may u sleep smiling under the
wanted=print stars. Amen (Facebook Update). Retrieved August 2,
Hibberd, J. (2010, January 31). “Jersey Shore” to relocate for 2010 from http://www.facebook.com/ photo.php?pid=
second season. Reuters. Retrieved September 7, 2010 3706892&id=10376464573&comments#!/ladygaga.
from http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE Lea, R. (2009, November 30). ‘Twitter’ declared top word of
6100I620100201 2009. Guardian.co.uk. Retrieved August 3, 2010 from
Hill, A. (2005). Reality TV: Audiences and popular factual http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/nov/30/twit-
television. New York: Routledge. ter-declared-top-word-of-2009.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of Lerman, K. (2007). Social networks and social information
the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill. filtering on Digg. In Proceedings of the International
Hollander, P. (2010). Michael Jackson, the celebrity cult, and Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Boulder,
popular culture. Society, 47(2), 147-152. CO. Retrieved October 12, 2010 from http://
Holmes, S. (2010). Dreaming a dream: Susan Boyle and arxiv.org/PS_cache/cs/pdf/0612/0612046v1.pdf
celebrity culture. The Velvet Light Trap, 65, 74-76. LSC [Learning and Skills Council]. (2006, January 13).
Holmes, S., & Redmond, S. (2006). Framing celebrity: New News Release: Kids seeking reality TV fame instead of
directions in celebrity culture. London and New York: exam passes. Retrieved August 8, 2010 from
Routledge. http://readingroom.lsc.gov.uk/lsc/2006/external_rela-
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and tions/press/kids-seeking- reality-tv-fame.pdf.
para-social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Luehrs-Kaiser, K. (2008, July 2). Desirée Nick spielt mit
Study of Interpersonal Processes, 19, 215-219. Florence Foster Jenkins sich selbst. Welt Online.
Howe, P. (2005). Paparazzi. New York: Artisan. Retrieved October, 28, 2010 from http://www.welt.de
Inglis, F. (2010). A short history of celebrity. Princeton, NJ: /welt_print/article2168374/Desiree_Nick_spielt_mit_
Princeton University Press. Florence_Foster_Jenkins_sich_selbst.html
Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. (2009). Maceuen, M. (1874). Celebrities. Philadelphia: Sherman &
Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Co., Printers.
Journal of the American Society for Information Macnamara, J. (2010). The 21st century media (r)evolution:
Science and Technology, 60(11), 2169-2188. Emergent communication practices. New York: Peter
Johansson, S. (2006). “Sometimes you wanna hate celebri- Lang.
ties”: Tabloid readers and celebrity coverage. In S. Marshall, P. D. (2006). New media—new self: The changing
Holmes & S. Redmond (Eds.), Framing celebrity: power of celebrity. In P. D. Marshall (Ed.), The
New directions in celebrity culture (pp. 343-358). celebrity culture reader (pp. 634-644). New York:
London and New York: Routledge. Routledge.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, Marshall, P. D. (2010). The promotion and presentation of
unite! The challenges and opportunities of social the self: Celebrity as marker of presentational media.
media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. Celebrity Studies, 1(1), 35-48.

Mendelson, A. L. (2007). On the function of the United from http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2009/03/
States paparazzi: Mosquito swarm or watchdogs of 23/2009-03-23_bummer_ashton_kutcher_
celebrity image control and power. Visual Studies, posts_pic_of_demi_.html.
22(2), 169-182. Petersen, A. (2007). Celebrity juice, not from concentrate:
Meraz, S. (2009). Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to Perez Hilton, gossip blogs, and the new star produc-
social media agenda setting influence in blog net- tion. Jump Cut: A Review of Contemporary Media, 49.
works, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communica- Retrieved August 23, 2010 from http://www.ejump-
tions, 14(3), p. 682-707. cut.org/archive/jc49.2007/PerezHilton/text.html”.
Mielich, J. (1996). Reality-TV: Authentizität und Ästhetik am PBS (n.d.). An American Family. PBS.org. Retrieved
Beispiel der Sendung “Augenzeugenvideo.” Alfeld: October 25, 2010 from http://www.pbs.org/
Coppi-Verlag. lanceloud/american/
Mischke, J. (2010, January 12). Die schlechteste Sängerin Pomerantz, D., & Rose, L. (2010, June 28). Celebrity 100:
der Welt. Hamburger Abendblatt. Retrieved October The world’s most powerful celebrities. Forbes.com.
28, 2010 from http://www.abendblatt.de/kultur- Retrieved October 8, 2010 from http://www.forbes
live/article1338462/Die-schlechteste-Saengerin-der- .com/2010/06/22/lady-gaga-oprah-winfrey-business-
Welt.html entertainment-celeb-100-10_land.html
Molyneaux, H., O’Donnell, S., Gibson, K., & Singer, J Ponce de Leon, C. L. (2002). Self-exposure: Human-interest
(2008). Exploring the gender divide on YouTube: An journalism and the emergence of celebrity in America,
analysis of the creation and reception of vlogs. 1890-1940. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North
American Communication Journal, 10(01). Carolina Press.
MTV.com (n.d.). The Real World Hollywood cast: Greg. Rao, S. (2010). “I Need an Indian Touch”: Glocalization and
MTV.com. Retrieved October 21, 2010 from Bollywood Films. Journal of International &
http://www.mtv.com/shows/real_world/hollywood/ Intercultural Communication, 3(1), 1-19.
cast_member.jhtml?personalityId=9875#moreinfo Raphael, C. (2009). The political economic origins of reali-
Muntean, N., & Petersen, A. H. (2009). Celebrity Twitter: TV. In S. Murray & L. Ouelette (Eds.), Reality TV:
Strategies of intrusion and disclosure in the age of Rethinking television culture (2nd ed.) (pp. 123-140).
technoculture. M/C Journal, 12(5). Retrieved August New York: New York University Press.
3, 2005 from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/ Redmond, S., & Holmes, S. (2007). Consuming fame/
index.php/mcjournal/article/viewArticle/194. becoming famous? Celebrity and its audience:
Murray, A. M. (2009). Your public is online: Public relations Introduction. In S. Redmond & S. Holmes (Eds.),
in an online world Unpublished master’s thesis, Stardom and celebrity: A reader (pp. 309-312).
University of Southern California. Retrieved London: Sage.
September 13, 2010 from http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/ Reichertz, J. (2007). Die Macht der Worte und der Medien.
assetserver/controller/view/search/etd-Murray-2604. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissen-
Murray, S., & Ouelette, L. (2004). Introduction. In S. Murray schaften.
& L. Ouelette. Reality TV: Rethinking television cul- Rein, I., Kotler, P., & Stoller, M. (1997). High visibility: The
ture (pp. 1-15). New York: New York University Press. making and marketing of professionals into celebri-
Nakashima, R. (2010, August 31). “Jersey Shore” saves ties. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.
MTV from rating slump: Second season opener draws Riley, S. G. (2010). Temporary celebrity. In S. G. Riley (Ed.).
more than 5 million viewers, show mentioned by Star struck: An encyclopedia of celebrity culture (pp.
Obama in speech. The Associated Press. Retrieved 294-299). Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Press.
October 24, 2010 from http://abcnews.go.com/ Rojek, C. (2001). Celebrity. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.
Technology/wireStory?id=11524699 Rössler, P., & Veigel, A. (2005). Was interessiert an Stars und
Paek, H.-J. (2005). Understanding celebrity endorsers in Sternchen? Entwicklung und Anwendung einer Skala
cross-cultural contexts: A content analysis of south zur Messung der Gratifikationsleistung von People-
Korean and US newspaper advertising. Asian Journal Magazinen: eine qualitative Pilotstudie. Publizistik,
of Communication, 15(2), 133-153. 50(4), 438- 461.
Patalong, F. (2009, January 16). Airbus-Unglück auf Twitter: Schierl, T. (2007a). Vorwort. In T. Schierl. Prominenz in den
“Da ist ein Flugzeug im Hudson River. Verrückt”. Medien. Zur Genese und Verwertung von Prominenten
Spiegel Online. Retrieved September 27, 2010 from in Sport, Wirtschaft, und Kultur (pp. 7-9). Koeln,
http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/0,1518,601588,0 Germany: Halem Verlag.
0.html. Schierl, T. (2007b). Ökonomie der Prominenz: Celebrity
Parker, E. (2009, March 23). Bum-mer! Ashton Kutcher sells: Zur medialen Produktion und Reproduktion von
posts pic of Demi Moore’s tush on Twitter. Prominenz. In T. Schierl (Ed.), Prominenz in den
NYdailynews.com. Retrieved September 27, 2010 Medien. Zur Genese und Verwertung von Prominenten

in Sport, Wirtschaft, und Kultur (pp. 98-121). Koeln, zenship, and the future of media (pp. ix-xix). New
Germany: Halem Verlag. York: Routledge.
Schudson, M. (2003). The sociology of news. New York: W. Turner, G. (2004). Understanding celebrity. Los Angeles:
W. Norton & Company. Sage.
Seifert, A. (2010). Das Model(l) Heidi Klum. Celebrities als Turner, G. (2006). The mass production of celebrity:
kulturelles Phänomen. Konstanz: UVK Verlag. “Celetoids,” reality TV, and the “demotic turn.”
Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. P. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(2), 153-
New York: Routledge. 165.
Simon, R. (2005). The changing definition of reality televi- Turner, G. (2010a). Approaching celebrity studies. Celebrity
sion. In G. R. Edgerton & B. G. Rose (Eds.), Thinking Studies, 1(1), p. 11-20.
outside the box: A contemporary television genre read- Turner, G. (2010b). Ordinary people and the media: The
er (pp. 179-200). Lexington, KY: University of demotic turn. Los Angeles: Sage.
Kentucky Press. Twitaholic. (2010, October 15). The Twitaholic.com top 100
Smolla, R. A. (1998). From paparazzi to hidden cameras: twitterholics based on followers. Retrieved October
The aggressive side of a free and responsible press. 15, 2010 from http://twitaholic.com/
Communication Law and Policy, 3(2), 315-329. Van der Wurff, R., Lauf, E., Balcytiene, A., Fortunati, L.,
Snyder, R. (2003). American journalism and the culture of Holmberg, S., Paulussen, S., et al. (2008). Online and
celebrity. Reviews in American History, 31(3), 440-448. print newspapers in Europe in 2003: Evolving towards
Soukup, C. (2006). Hitching a ride on a star: Celebrity, fan- complementarity. Communications, 33(4), 403-430.
dom, and identification on the World Wide Web. Von Doederlein, L. (1841). Hand-book of Latin synonymes.
Southern Communication Journal, 71(4), 319-337. London: J.G.F. & J. Rivington.
Stever, G. S. (2009). Parasocial and social interaction with Vorderer, P. (Ed.). (1996). Fernsehen als “Beziehungskiste”:
celebrities: Classification of media fans. Journal of Parasoziale Beziehungen und Interaktionen mit TV-
Media Psychology, 14(3). Retrieved August 24, 2010 Personen. Opladen, Germany: VS Verlag für
from http://www.calstatela.edu/faculty/sfischo/ Sozialwissenschaften.
Stefanone, M. A., Lackaff, D., & Rosen, D. (2008). We’re all Waggenspack, B. M. (2010). Reality television’s role. In S.
stars now: Reality television, web 2.0, and mediated G. Riley (Ed.), Star struck: An encyclopedia of celebri-
identities. In HT ’08: Proceedings of the Nineteenth ty culture (pp. 251-256). Santa Barbara, CA:
ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (pp. Greenwood Press.
107-112), New York: ACM Press. Wallsten, K. (2007). Agenda setting and the blogosphere: An
Stone, B. (2009, July 30). YouTube wedding video spurs analysis of the relationship between mainstream media
music sales. The New York Times. Retrieved August 2, and political blogs. Review of Policy Research, 24(6),
2010 from http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/ 567-587.
30/youtube-trumpets-popularity-of-viral-wedding- Willis, K. (2007). Paparazzi, tabloids, and the new
dance/?scp=1&sq=chris%20brown%20wedding% Hollywood press: Can celebrities claim a defensible
20dance&st=cse. publicity right in order to prevent the media from fol-
Tandoc, E. C., & Skoric, M. M. (2010). The pseudo-events lowing their every move? Texas Review of
paradox: How pseudo-events flood the Philippine Entertainment & Sports Law, 9(1), 175-202.
press and why journalists don’t recognize it. Asian Wippersberg, J. (2007). Prominenz: Entstehung,
Journal of Communication, 20(1), 33-50. Erklärungen, Erwartungen. Konstanz, Germany:
Théberge, P. (2005). Everyday fandom: Fan clubs, blogging, UVK Verlag.
and the quotidian rhythms of the Internet. Canadian
Journal of Communication, 30(4), Retrieved
Additional Bibliography
September 9, 2010 from http://cjc-online.ca/index
.php/journal/article/viewArticle/1673/1810. Andrejevic, M. (2008). Watching television without pity:
Ting-Toomey, S., & Chung, L. C. (2005). Understanding The productivity of online fans. Television & New
intercultural communication. Los Angeles: Roxbury Media, 9(1), 24-46.
Publishing Company. Babcock, W., & Whitehouse, V. (2005). Celebrity as a post-
Totty, M. (2007, May 14). How to be a star in a YouTube modern phenomenon, ethical crisis for democracy, and
world. What it takes to stand out when anyone can be media nightmare. Journal of Mass Media Ethics,
an entertainer. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 20(2/3), 176-191.
November 1, 2010 from http://online.wsj.com/arti- Banks, J. (2005). Keeping “abreast” of MTV and Viacom:
cle/SB117873682757897483.html. The growing power of a media conglomerate. In J.
Tremayne, M. (2007). Introduction: Examining the blog- Wasko (Ed.), A companion to television (pp. 256-269).
media relationship. In M. Tremayne. Blogging, citi- Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.

Barry, E. (2008). Celebrity, cultural production, and public Derrick, J. L., Gabriel, S., & Tippin, B. (2008), Parasocial
life. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(3), relationships and self-discrepancies: Faux relation-
251-258. ships have benefits for low self-esteem individuals.
Baym, N. K. (2000). Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and Personal Relationships, 15, 261–280.
online community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. De Sibandze, E. G., & Garside, D. (2009). Media and
Beaty, J. (2009, November). The real world of stardom: celebrity: Towards a postmodern understanding of the
Celebrity gossip transformed by reality TV. Paper pre- role of reality television in the development of new
sented at the 95th Annual Convention of the National forms of South African/African celebrity. Nawa
Communication Association, Chicago, IL. Journal of Communication, 3(1), 19-30.
Benson, J. (2009). Calculation, celebrity, and scandal. Earl, B. (2008). Literary tourism: Constructions of value,
Journalism Studies, 10(6), 837-850. celebrity, and distinction. International Journal of
Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2009, December 25). Social Cultural Studies, 11(4), 401-417.
transmission, emotion, and the virality of online con- Elcessor, L. (2009). People I want to know: Twitter, celebri-
tent. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved ty, and social connection. FlowTV—A Critical Forum
September 30, 2010 from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ on Television and Media Culture, 9(14). Retrieved
papers.cfm?abstract_id=1528077. August 8, 2010 from http://flowtv.org/2009/05/people-
Berlanstein, L. (2004). Historicing and gendering celebrity i-want-to-know-twitter-celebrity-and-social-connec-
culture: Famous women in nineteenth-century France. tionliz-ellcessor-university-of-wisconsin-madison/.
Journal of Women’s History, 16(4), 65-91. Ferris, K. (2007). The sociology of celebrity. Sociology
Biressi A., Nunn, H. (2005). Reality TV: Realism and reve- Compass, 1(1), 371-384.
lation. London: Wallflower Press. Filak, V. (2009). Sports mania: Essays on fandom and the
Biressi, A., & Nunn, H. (2008). The especially remarkable: media in the 21st century. Journalism & Mass
Celebrity and social mobility in reality TV. In A. Communication Quarterly, 86(1), 240-241.
Biressi, & H. Nunn (Eds.), The tabloid culture reader Fraser, B., & Brown, W. (2002). Media, celebrities, and
(pp. 149-162). New York: Open University social influence: Identification with Elvis Presley.
Press/McGraw Hill. Mass Communication & Society, 5(2), 183-206.
Bouzeos, D. (1989). How to make the most of celebrity Friedman, H., Termini, S., & Washington, R. (1976). The
appearances. Public Relations Quarterly, 34(2), 25-27. effectiveness of advertisements utilizing four types of
Braudy, L. (1986). The frenzy of renown: Fame and its his- endorsers. Journal of Advertising, 5(3), 22-24.
tory. New York: Oxford University Press. Gamson, J. (1994). Claims to fame. Celebrity in contempo-
Brown, W., & Basil, M. (1995). Media celebrities and public rary America. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London:
health: Responses to “Magic” Johnson’s HIV disclo- University of California Press.
sure and its impact on AIDS and high-risk behaviors. Giles, D., & Mrowicki, J. (2005). Desire and motivation for
Health Communication, 7(4), 345-370. fame in a group of aspiring musicians: A qualitative
Chia, S., & Yip Ling, P. (2009). Media, celebrities, and fans: study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
An examination of adolescents’ media usage and International Communication Association.
involvement with entertainment celebrities. Journal- Gray, J., Sandvoss, C., & Harrington, C. L. (2007). Fandom:
ism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(1), 23-44. Identities and communities in a mediated world. New
Choi, C. J., & Berger, R. (2010). Ethics of celebrities and York: New York University Press.
their increasing influence in 21st century society. Grindstaff, L. (2007, May). Who wants to be a celebrity (and
Journal of Business Ethics, 91(3), 313-318. why)? The case of MTV’s sorority life. Paper presented
Choi, S., & Rifon, N. (2007). Who is the celebrity in adver- at the annual meeting of the International Communi-
tising? Understanding dimensions of celebrity images. cation Association, San Francisco, CA.
Journal of Popular Culture, 40(2), 304-324. Hammer, R. (2000). Anti-feminists as media celebrities.
Clegg Smith, K., Twum, D., & Carslon Gielen, A. (2009). Review of Education, Pedagogy & Cultural Studies,
Special Issue: The message and the media. Media cov- 22(3), 207-224.
erage of celebrity DUIs: Teachable moments or prob- Hayward, S. (2008). Beyond desire? Star bodies and sensation.
lematic social modeling? Alcohol & Alcoholism, Communication, Culture & Critique, 1(3), 253-267.
44(3), 256- 260. Hedges, C. (2010). Celebrity culture and the Obama brand.
Collins, R. (1994). Building a media celebrity: The Marquis Tikkun, 25(1), 33-72.
de Morés and the gilded age. North Dakota Journal of Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures in four dimensions.
Speech & Theatre, 7(1), 24-41. International Studies of Management and Organiza-
Couldry, N., & Markham, T. (2007). Celebrity culture and tion, 13, 46-74.
public connection: Bridge or chasm? International Holmes, S. (2007). The BBC and television fame in the
Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(4), 403-421. 1950s: Living with the Grove Family (1954–57) and

going Face-to-Face (1959–62) with television. Meyers, E. (2009). “Can you handle my truth?” Authenticity
European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(4), 427-445. and the celebrity star image. Journal of Popular
Hunter, E. (2008). Perusing Perez. How do taste hierarchies, Culture, 42(5), 890-907.
leisure preferences, and social status interact among Mistry, B. (2006). Star spotting. Marketing (June), 33-34.
visitors to Perez Hilton’s celebrity blog? Unpublished Mole, T. (2008). Lord Byron and the end of fame.
dissertation, London School of Economics. Retrieved International Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(3), 343-
October 12, 2010 from http://www2.lse.ac.uk/media@ 361.
lse/research/mediaWorkingPapers/MScDissertationSe Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to
ries/Hunter_final.pdf. measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise,
Jacke, C. (2007). Stars und Prominenz. Kulturprogramman- trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of
wender in der Medienproduktion zwischen Tradition Advertising, 19(3), 39-52.
und Abversion. In T. Schierl (Ed.), Prominenz in den Oppliger, P., & Baran, J. (2008, August). “I wanna be Paris’
Medien. Zur Genese und Verwertung von Prominenten new best friend!” Para-social relationships in celebri-
in Sport, Wirtschaft, und Kultur (pp. 60-80). Koeln, ty culture. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
Germany: Halem Verlag. Association for Education in Journalism and Mass
Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring Communication, Chicago, IL.
participatory culture. New York: New York University Parameswaran, R. (2004). Global queens, national celebri-
Press. ties: Tales of feminine triumph in post-liberalization
Kitch, C. (2005). A genuine, vivid personality. Journalism India. Critical Studies in Media Communication,
History, 31(3), 122-137. 21(4), 346-370.
Kurzman, C., Anderson, C., Key, C., Lee, Y. O., Moloney, Petersen, A. H. (2009). “We’re making our own paparazzi”:
M., Silver, A., et al. (2007). Celebrity Status. Twitter and the construction of star authenticity.
Sociological Theory, 25(4), 347-367. FlowTV—A Critical Forum on Television and Media
Leppert, A., & Wilson, J. (2008). Living The Hills life: Culture, 9(14). Retrieved August 8, 2010 from
Lauren Conrad as reality star, soap opera heroine, and http://flowtv.org/2009/05/people-i-want-to-know-twit-
brand. Genders, 48. Retrieved September 1, 2010 from ter-celebrity-and-social-connectionliz-ellcessor-uni-
http://www.genders.org/g48/g48_leppertwilson.html. versity-of- wisconsin-madison/.
Maier, M., & Ruhrmann, G. (2008). Celebrities in action and Pollack, J. (2006). Gossip about celebrities isn’t journalism.
other news factors of German TV news 1992–2004 St. Louis Journalism Review, 36(283), 14-15.
results from a content analysis. Human Redmond, S. (2006). Intimate fame everywhere. In S.
Communication, 11(2), 201-217. Holmes & S. Redmond (Eds.), Framing celebrity:
Maltby, J., McCutcheon, L., Ashe, D., & Houran, J. (2001). New directions in celebrity culture (pp. 27-43). New
The self-reported psychological well-being of celebri- York: Routledge.
ty worshippers. North American Journal of Shepard, A. (1997). Celebrity journalists. American
Psychology, 3(3), 441-452. Journalism Review, 19, 26-31.
Marsh, C. (1997). Jesus as media celebrity: Jesus research Simonson, P. (2006). Celebrity, public image, and American
and the contemporary church. Modern Believing, political life: Rereading Robert K. Merton’s Mass
38(4), 2-8. Persuasion. Political Communication, 23(3), 271-284.
Mathur, L., Mathur, I., & Rangan, N. (1997). The wealth Simpson, S. (n.d.). “Bytes, web camera, democratisation!”
effects associated with a celebrity endorser: The A critical examination of the Internet’s impact upon
Michael Jordan phenomenon. Journal of Advertising celebrity studies. Retrieved October 12, 2010 from
Research, 37(3), 67-73. http://people.brunel.ac.uk/bst/vol0801/sarahsimpson/
McCutcheon, L., Aruguete, M., Scott Jr., V., Parker, J., & home.html
Calicchia, J. (2006). The development and validation Snyder, R. (2003). American journalism and the culture of
of an indirect measure of celebrity stalking. North celebrity. Reviews in American History, 31(3), 440-448.
American Journal of Psychology, 8(3), 503-516. Spigel, L., & Olsson, J. (2004). Television after TV: Essays
McCutcheon, L., Ashe, D., Houran, J., & Maltby, J. (2003). on a medium in transition. Durham: Duke University
A cognitive profile of individuals who tend to worship Press.
celebrities. Journal of Psychology, 137(4), 309-322. Squiers, C. (1999). Class struggle: The invention of paparazzi
McCutcheon, L., Lange, R., & Houran, J. (2002). photography and the death of Diana, Princess of Wales.
Conceptualization and measurement of celebrity wor- In Overexposed: Essays on contemporary photography
ship. British Journal of Psychology, 93(1), 67-88. (pp. 269–304). New York: New Press.
McDonald, P. (2000). The star system. Hollywood’s produc- Smolla, R. A. (1998). From paparazzi to hidden cameras:
tion of popular identities. London: Wallflower The aggressive side of a free and responsible press.
Publishing Limited. Communication Law and Policy, 3(2), 315-329.

Stefanone, M. A., & Lackaff, D. (2009). Reality television as not all deal with the rhetoric, properly defined, of John
a model for online behavior: Blogging, photo, and Paul II. Instead they examine the late pope as both a
video sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated rhetor and as a rhetorical subject. Each of these broad
Communication, 14(4), 964-987. categories becomes further subdivided: John Paul him-
Sternthal, B., Dholakia, R., & Leavitt, C. (1978). The per- self as a rhetor and, by a species of metonymy, John
suasive effect of source credibility: Tests of cognitive
Paul II’s Vatican as the source of communication texts;
response. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 252-
260.
and John Paul II himself as subject and, by a similar
Thomas, J. (2008). From people power to mass hysteria: figure, the Catholic Church led by John Paul II as the
Media and popular reactions to the death of Princess subject of public comment.
Diana. International Journal of Cultural Studies, The editors’ introductory essay, after highlighting
11(3), 362-376. the importance of John Paul to the Church and in the
Tian, Q., & Hoffner. (2007, May). Parasocial interaction world during his pontificate, sets out the contributors’
and identification with liked, neutral, and disliked conviction of a “rhetoric as epistemic” approach, that
characters. Paper presented at the annual meeting of rhetoric contributes to knowledge generation (p. xi).
the International Communication Association, San Further perspectives include those of “Kenneth Burke,
Francisco, CA. feminism, genre criticism, framing, image restoration/
Tratos, M. (2004). Celebrity and the ownership of a televi- apologia, and ideological analysis” (p. xi). They aim to
sion persona: The nexus between character rights,
present a broad canvas on which the reader can better
rights of publicity, and trademark rights. Licensing
Journal, 24(8), 15-23.
understand the Catholic Church in the late 20th century
Treme, J. (2010). Effects of celebrity media exposure on through a lens focused on one pope. They then introduce
box-office performance. Journal of Media Economics, the four parts of the book: “Pope John Paul II and the
23(1), 5-16. Media,” “Pope John Paul II and the Rhetoric of Social
Voynich, M. L. (2009). How does Perez do it? Evaluating Justice,” “Pope John Paul II and Political Rhetoric,” and
tabloid news transparency and credibility in the blo- “Pope John Paul II and Theological Rhetoric.”
gosphere. Unpublished master’s thesis, Auburn One weakness of the volume—not surprising—
University. Retrieved September 24, 2010 from arises from the sheer number and different approaches
http://etd.auburn.edu/etd/handle/10415/1541. of the contributors, each defining “John Paul II” in dif-
Wegener, C. (2008). Medien, Aneignung und Identität: ferent ways. And so, in Part I, examining the late pope
„Stars“ im Alltag jugendlicher Fans. Wiesbaden,
Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. and the media, we find essays not on John Paul II’s
skillful use of mass media, but, first, on how late-night
comedy shows in the United States treated the pope or
Book Reviews the Catholic Church as a source or object of humor
Blaney, Joseph R. and Joseph P. Zompetti (Eds.). (Brian Kaylor and Josh Compton), and second, on polit-
The Rhetoric of Pope John Paul II. Lanham, MD: ical cartoons attacking the Catholic Church over the
Lexington Books (A division of Rowman & Littlefield, sexual abuse scandal (William Benoit and Kevin Stein).
Publishers), 2009. Pp. xiv, 311. ISBN 978-0-7391- Part II on the pope’s rhetoric of social justice
2133-7 (hbk.) $80.00; 978-0-7391-2134-4 (pb.) hews closer to traditional rhetorical analysis. Zompetti
$34.95. examines the 1992 Catechism of the Catholic Church
from a Burkean perspective of the rhetoric of religion,
During his long pontificate, John Paul II deliv- looking particularly at “indoctrination and share con-
ered thousands of public addresses, often many in one ceptions of reality” in the light of “Burke’s concepts of
day during his pastoral visits around the world. He reg- the purification ritual, identification, and representative
ularly appeared as the subject of radio and television anecdote” (p. 43). The Catechism, a key teaching doc-
news coverage as well as presided at huge public litur- ument, advances the Catholic Church’s goal of global
gies, many themselves carried live on television. He social justice. Though John Paul II did not write the
also wrote extensively in forms ranging from encycli- Catechism, he did review it prior to publication and
cals to short prayers and exhortations. Joseph Blaney actually mandated a number of editorial changes in the
and Joseph Zompetti choose him, then, as the focal draft he received from the commission created by his
subject for their book on religious rhetoric. Despite the predecessor Paul VI. Only in this sense can we view
book’s title, however, the 14 essays collected here do the 1992 book as part of John Paul II’s rhetorical opera.

The next analysis, on just war rhetoric (Craig Cutbirth terms of sin and redemption. Kimberly Kennedy’s
and Megan Houge), examines the pope’s and the essay turns to a more theological work: the late pope’s
Vatican’s attempt to influence U.S. policy and counter Marian theology, as manifest in his encyclicals and
the Bush administration’s arguments for war with Iraq addresses. Using a framing analysis, Kennedy shows
in 2003. Here, John Paul II’s January 13, 2003 state- how John Paul II reframed contemporary feminism in
ment provides the key text for the Catholic Church’s a theology of the feminine. Dennis Cali broadens the
rejection of the U.S. rationale for war. Finally, Jason view to analyze how John Paul II transformed the role
Edwards offers a close reading of John Paul II’s jubilee of the papal encyclical letter through the use of both
year apology for past wrongs committed by the rhetorical and dialectical appeals to multiple audiences
Catholic Church. Edwards frames the discourse in (p. 235). Christopher Layden turns from the written
terms of the genre of apologia, tracing both the devel- word of the encyclical to the former pope’s influence
opment of the rhetorical approach and the components on preaching and the spoken word in the Catholic
utilized by the pope in this most significant (and often Church. Specifying the “homily” more closely, Joseph
overlooked) document. Valenzano examines just one—John Paul II’s final
Part 3, on political rhetoric, largely addresses the homily, delivered not in words but in the final months
situation of the Catholic Church in Poland. Cezar of his life, as his health failed and he, through his
Ornatowski examines the “crucial role in the process actions, offered a Christian approach to dying and
of political transition in Poland” (p. 103) played by the death. In the book’s last chapter Phil Chidester looks at
late pope through a detailed review of his eight visits the Catholic Church from the outside, as a “rhetorical
to his native country between 1979 and 2002. other,” as it and John Paul II appeared to the Church of
Ornatowski tracks the changes in John Paul II’s rhetor- Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, or Mormon Church.
ical approach from speaking in Communist Poland This volume, then, presents a variety of rhetorical
through the current democratic Poland. Much of the tools in the service of a variety of rhetorical approach-
analysis depends on a prior analysis of the political sites, all more or less focused on John Paul II, either in his
uation, which the essay provides. The second essay in utterances, in his person, or in the institution he head-
this section, by David Burns, seems more historical ed. Each chapter contains its own reference list; the
than rhetorical in its approach. It focuses on the book closes with a short subject index.
“Catholic Church political role” (p. 151) in Poland, —Paul A. Soukup, S.J.
before and after the 1989 rejection of Communism. Santa Clara University
The essay provides valuable background to under-
standing why John Paul II took the rhetorical Craig, Robert T. and Muller, Heidi L. Theorizing
approaches he did when speaking in Poland. The final communication: Readings across traditions. Los
essay in this section examines a very different Angeles: Sage Publications, 2007. Pp. xviii, 525.
approach to political rhetoric. Kristina Drumheller and ISBN978-1-4129-5237-8 (pb.) $66.95
Matthew Drumheller turn away from national politics
to the ideological issues in John Paul II’s World An examination of a couple of prominent text-
Communication Day messages. Each year the pope books in communication theory shows the influence of
issues a message on communication, addressed both to Robert Craig’s (1999) essay in Communication Theory.
communication practitioners and to Catholics in gen- Katherine Miller predicted in the first edition of her
eral. Often addressing the role on media in society, the theory text (2002) that Craig’s “conceptual matrix has
chapter’s analysis of the messages provides a window not yet been widely adopted in the field, [but] it surely
into how the pope sought to influence the larger polit- will be in the future” (p. 12). Griffin (2009) draws from
ical relationship between media systems and individ- the seven-tradition framework in the fourth chapter of
ual cultures. his text to set the stage for his chapters on 32 commu-
The last section addresses the theological. The nication theories. The essay is the foundation of
first essay, by Blaney, provides a close reading of John Theorizing Communication, a text by Craig and Heidi
Paul II’s address to the American bishops in the midst L. Muller that explores the seven traditions in detail
of the sexual abuse crisis. The talk itself seems more through primary sources from theorists.
addressed to repair strategies than to a theological The authors set the stage with a section on
analysis, though it does find an theological anchor in “Historical and Cultural Sources of Communication

Theory.” Four articles from key historical eras illustrate tion theorizing: Buber’s “Dialogue,” wherein the
the origins of assumptions about communication theo- author argues that dialogue reaches out beyond signs or
rizing. Rob Wiseman writes about Homer’s use of “outside contents” of a conversation (p. 227), Gadamer
metaphors in The Iliad which exhibit a far different and dialogue as a hermeneutic effort, and Briankle
understanding of how meaning is felt by communica- Chang’s “Deconstructing Communication.” Chang
tors who do not embrace a concept of mind. argues that communication, in the sense that it occurs
Augustine’s notion of words as vessels for spirit is dis- to truly understand another, is, paradoxically, only suc-
cussed. More metaphors are introduced by Mattelart cessful when we fail to understand each other.
who describes 17th and 18th century communication “The Cybernetic Tradition” section, which focus-
theory as emanating from new developments in topog- es on communication as information processing,
raphy (canals), engineering (bridges), and medicine includes, among other articles, Wiener’s “Cybernetics
(circulation). Carey distinguishes the two dominant in History” and Watzlawick, Beavin, and Jackson’s
models in communication theorizing—the transmis- classic essay that presents the axioms of communica-
sion and the ritual. Craig and Muller include Craig’s tion. Annie Lang draws on television messages as a
(1999) Communication Theory essay as the single way to explicate an information processing model of
entry in the “Metatheory” section of their book. The communication that involves limited use of encoding,
essay lays out his seven traditions that are based on two storage, and retrieval of messages. A third article by
assumptions about communication theory—one that German Social theorist Niklas Luhmann is included,
human symbol-use constitutes communication in many but the section does not offer an original statement by
different ways (a constitutive model of communication Claude Shannon.
as opposed to a transmission model) and two, that the- Craig and Muller’s section on the “Sociopsycho-
orizing is based on meta-discourse that attempts to logical Tradition” includes chapters that represent the
solve practical problems. In this essay, the author vast influence on the discipline of social scientific
underscores that no consensus exists in the field, and approaches to communication as a process of social
that communication theorizing ought to have a basis in interaction. The influence is seen in Hovland’s descrip-
the meta-discourse of practical situations in order to tion of communication as a “problem,” in the sense that
create opportunities for the interaction of conceptual- its complexities outrun mere artful use of language, and,
izations of communication. particularly at the time, were not studied by an “isolated
Each section on the theoretical traditions has four specialist” (p. 319) The Hovland piece is a representa-
to five original essays preceded by a short introductory tion of the influence of the social scientific turn—other
overview. For example, the “Rhetorical Tradition” sec- chapters in the section present more contemporary com-
tion presents Plato’s Gorgias, excerpts from Aristotle’s munication theory, such as Bandura’s piece on “Social
The Rhetoric, Burke’s Rhetoric of Motives, and Foss and Cognitive Theory and Mass Communication.” Berger
Griffin’s Beyond Persuasion. Foss and Griffin introduce and Calbrese are credited with forming one of the first
invitational rhetoric as an alternative to longstanding original communication theories of interpersonal inter-
patriarchal conceptions of rhetoric as power or domina- action by conceptualizing communication as a process
tion over others. Similarly, the “Semiotic Tradition” sec- of reducing uncertainty. Poole posits that the small group
tion shifts from privileged rhetoric to concentrate more (three to 10 members) is the fundamental unit of com-
on human understanding rather than on influence. The munication research as it provides the “minimal unit of
authors included John Locke’s essay The Abuse of Words analysis in which the social context of communication
as an early indictment of the misuse of language. His comes into play, yet the individuality of the actors can be
work laid the foundation for modern semiotics repre- discerned” (p .358).
sented in articles by Pierce on types of signs, and by “The Sociocultural Tradition” frames communi-
Saussure, Barthes, and John Durham Peters. cation as the means of producing and reproducing cul-
The section on the “Phenomenological Tradition” ture. Theorists form this tradition may approach the
begins with a two-page piece by Husserl that helps question from the perspective of society or from that of
clarify the phenomenological approach: we “verify,” the individual, a sort of chicken or egg question about
he writes, our experience of others “in the realm of our the interplay of social and individual influences leading
own transcendental ego” (p. 224). Subsequent pieces to the construction of culture. The authors include
trace the influence of phenomenology on communica- Mead’s foundational essay on the relationship of com-

munication to the formation of society, an article by poor, and examining it for rhetorical strategies. In the
Mark Poster on the relationship of information and post Critical Traditional section, the authors suggest that
modernity, and Deborah Cameron’s “Good to Talk.” students evaluate the validity of the efforts of some
The final tradition in the text is the “Critical writers who have drawn from the work of Horkheimer
Tradition.” This section begins with essays from Marx and Adorno to argue that the Internet may increase
and Engels, Horkheimer and Adorno, and Habermas as channels for democracy (p. 492). The book has sepa-
a way to present the ideas of the Frankfurt School. rate author and subject indexes.
Deetz (1992) argues that all communication is distort- —Pete Bicak
ed and that distortion becomes problematic when it is Rockhurst University
embedded in communication and drives behavior
among the communicators. Jansen provides an References
overview essay that retraces some of the waves of crit- Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field.
ical theory, ultimately suggesting that a pursuit of a Communication Theory, 9, 119-161.
Griffin, E. (2009). A first look at communication theory, 7th
eutopian (better) society is important, irrespective of
ed. New York: McGraw-Hill
the fact that it may be impossible to reach, because the Miller, K. (2002). Communication theories: Perspectives,
pursuit gives rise to ways the language of domination processes, and contexts. New York: McGraw- Hill
can be revealed. Russill, C. (2004). Toward a pragmatist theory of communi-
The authors briefly explore the extent to which cation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylva-
seven traditions are an appropriate representation of the nia State University, University Park, PA.
field. In essence, they ask “should there be more tradi-
tions?” They propose four possibilities that are worth Fitzpatrick, Kathy, and Carolyn Bronstein. Ethics in
pursuing. A feminist tradition, the authors suggest, Public Relations: Responsible Advocacy. Thousand
seems to be a tradition in its own right, but lacks a “dis- Oaks, CA: Sage publications, 2006. Pp. 256. ISBN
tinct way of understanding communication and com- 9781412917971 (hbk.) $106.00; 9781412917988 (pb.)
munication problems” (p. 497). Similarly, a second $47.95.
possible addition, biological factors, while present in
some form in all communication theories, do not pres- The book is a collection of 10 articles written by
ent a unique set of elements to identify it as a separate authors either working in the field of PR or as academ-
tradition. The authors concede that a third potential tra- ics. They seem to know well the subject they write
dition, the pragmatic, may be illustrated by their model about. And the subject is public relations practiced as
itself (a claim advanced by Russill, 2004), in that the responsible advocacy in today’s North American busi-
model seems to have as its organizing principle under- ness, nonprofit, and government transactions serving
standing theory and practice in a pluralistic society. their own diverse interests. The authors argue that PR
Finally, a non-western tradition is certainly worthy of also needs to serve the public interest. Balancing both
exploration, but to simply add such a tradition or cate- of these is the delicate PR job. The word the authors
gory of theory in order to highlight the immense possi- prefer is advocacy, as it is something that can be direct-
bility of such perspectives would ironically highlight ed to the management as well as to the public. They
the Euro-centricity of the other seven distinct tradi- define PR as advocacy, as far as it is a voice in the mar-
tions. Clearly, though, the authors encourage debate on ket place of ideas, facts, and view points to aid
the traditions—both their distinctions and potentially informed public opinion.
blurred lines: “Blending, hybridization, and innovation Thus this collection of essays gives the views of
are all inevitable and all potentially good things from leading scholars of public relations on the meaning of
our point of view” (p. 495). responsible advocacy and the implications for public
Each section of this fine collection, with the relations theory and practice.
exception of the last, includes “projects for theorizing” The authors highlight the fact that efforts to build
within each tradition. The authors recommend addi- ethical and effective relationships with multiple stake-
tional readings, application exercises, and projects. For holders have become more complicated in a world
example, an application exercise in the Rhetorical increasingly diverse, and with more and more active
Tradition suggests identifying rhetorical strategies in a publics who are connected and empowered by the
set of texts, or finding a speech the reader thinks is Internet. Ethical standards once designed to address

public relations practice via the old media such as of responsible advocacy, argues Linda Hon in chapter
newspapers and television are not sufficiently devel- 4. Nonprofit organizations and their challenges in PR
oped for the more sophisticated new media of online are the subject of chapter 5 by Carolyn Bronstein. The
communication. The authors also deal with areas like new media offer new opportunities to nonprofit organ-
market place of ideas, relationship management, risk izations, but many of these tend to indulge in unethical
communications, and the promotion of global under- means in PR work. Legal scandals and crises and how
standing of U.S. foreign policies, etc. Ethical guide- these need to be redeemed by PR work is the subject of
posts for responsible advocacy as the various authors chapter 6 (Karla Gower).
see them include individual accountability, informed Online communication ethics becomes the spe-
decision making, multi-cultural understanding, rela- cial focus in the next chapter. Kirk Hallaham speaks of
tionship building, open communication, dialogue, the need for access and choice, accuracy of content,
truth, transparency, and integrity. avoidance of deceptive practices, dependability, inter-
The book also clearly delineates ethical public activity and involvement, personalization and cus-
relations and effective public relations and suggests tomization, privacy and security, and usefulness and
that one leads to the other. Responsible advocacy based usability as various criteria for ethics in online com-
on open and honest communication helps businesses, munication.
governments, and nonprofits alike meet the ethical The people’s ‘right to know’ is proposed as a
expectation of strategic constituents and build the rela- major guideline for ethical risk communication in
tionships needed to accomplish organizational goals. chapter 8 by Michael J. Palenchar and Robert L. Heath.
The authors suggest strongly that as advocates in The chapter contends that risk communication profes-
the market place of ideas, PR professionals need to sionals should serve as “internal voices for external
strive to further the ideals of democratic institutions. interests” helping organizations interpret public per-
The common good can be served only when the voices ceptions of risk. Chapter 9 (Philip Seib) explores the
of special interests present their views in ways that tenets of U.S. public diplomacy in the wake of terrorist
advance informed decision making and contribute to attacks like 9/11. It is hard to reassert U.S. credibility
the well-being of the greater society. in some countries in such situations. The chapter delin-
Since the chapters are by different authors let me eates clearly between propaganda and public diploma-
highlight the content of each. cy and considers how far the latter can stray from
The first chapter by Kathy Fitzpatrick explores objectivity before it becomes dishonest.
the convergence of legal and ethical standards in PR The final chapter (by Donald K. Wright) consid-
and the importance of responsible advocacy in sustain- ers PR ethics from an international perspective.
ing the U.S. Constitution’s first amendment protection Cultural considerations are underlined and maximum
for public relations expression. Chapter 2 (Thomas H. individual responsibilities are called for in internation-
Bivins) analyzes the difference between responsibility al practitioners. The author also notes the shortcomings
and accountability and concludes that these are com- in codes of ethics and argues for more scholarly atten-
plementary; responsible advocacy will require public tion to international concerns in global PR.
relations professionals to be individually accountable This indeed is a very useful book for public rela-
for their decisions and actions. tions scholars, students, professionals, and others
Chapter 3 by Larissa A. Grunig and Elizabeth L. interested in the practice of the subject.. The book
Toth discusses feminist and organizational values, the very well combines theoretical as well as practical
relationship between diversity and effectiveness, and elements in PR. The examples they choose are all
philosophical approaches to diversity and public rela- American but PR practitioners worldwide can see
tions. The authors challenge organizational values that their relevance in their local contexts, too. The book
may oppress either female practitioners or the public and looks at various elements of PR like accountability,
recommend a deontological, principles-based approach responsibility, transparency, loyalty, truth telling, fair-
as the best means of achieving responsible advocacy. ness, and so on with calculated authenticity and clar-
Relationships between organizations and activist ity. The whole manner of presentation is non-preachy
groups and the importance of especially proactive rela- or dogmatic but suggestive of subtle ways of practic-
tionships based on open communication and empower- ing the profession with more sincerity. At the end of
ment of the public is a key mechanism in the practice the book one feels that PR practitioners have an ongo-

ing ethical imperative to advocate responsibly. And Two chapters describe the impact of the vice pres-
this is the success of this book. idential selections. In these, readers learn that Joe
—Jacob Srampickal, S.J. Biden, despite his propensity for gaffes, helped his
Pontifical Gregorian University, Rome ticket because reporters respected his intelligence and
experience and conveyed that to the public. We also
Kenski, Kate, Bruce W. Hardy, and Kathleen Hall learn that the Gibson-Couric interviews with Sarah
Jamieson. Obama Victory: How Media, Money, and Palin and the subsequent Tina Fey parodies on
Message Shaped the 2008 Election. Oxford and New Saturday Night Live damaged her efforts to be viewed
York: Oxford University Press, 2010. Pp. xvii, 378. as competent to become president. Surprise! The book
ISBN 978-0-539956-1 (pb.) $21.95. creates a record of the opinion polls that may eventual-
ly be of value to scholars but may bore current readers.
Fifty years from now scholars studying how The same is true for much of the rest of the book.
Barack Obama overcame the odds of winning the 2008 We discover that the crash of the economy hurt McCain
election may turn to this impeccably researched book as did Obama’s successful efforts to link McCain with
with its detailed regressions of the impact of various the unpopular Bush administration. No kidding! The
factors on voter decisions. They will find a wealth of data confirm what every reporter said in the week after
data, charts, and graphs; meticulous explanations of the first debate—a lot of voters overcame their fears
methodology; and carefully drawn conclusions. that Obama wasn’t up to being president. The book
However people who followed the election close- also chronicles McCain’s comeback in the last weeks
ly—presumably the bulk of those likely to explore this of the campaign courtesy of help to voters from Joe the
book—may feel like they are reading yesterday’s news Plumber and messages about “socialism.”
supplemented by charts, graphs, and regression analy- The final chapters of the book discuss some of the
ses. For the most part the data confirm what journalis- new methodologies of campaigning such as targeting
tic analysts said while the election was in progress so messages to select demographics via radio and cable
there aren’t many substantive surprises. The book stations and programs, and the use of online
mostly offers statistical confirmation of what campaign media/emails. The authors try to determine the impact
junkies like me already know about the election. of having more money to buy more media and discov-
Unfortunately for Kenski, Hardy, and Jamieson, er that it helps—a finding that they decry in their con-
no election has ever been covered in such excruciating clusions. Surprise! Surprise!
detail by as many forms of media for such an engaged The discussion of the impact of early voting in the
public as the 2008 presidential race. Even non-math 34 states that allow it is one of the more interesting
people like me were checking the percentage odds chapters. The authors seem to fear that it will blunt the
daily online, being bombarded by email from the can- impact of startling last minute campaign revelations
didates, emailing political tidbits and campaign trash because growing percentages of voters will have
talk to friends, voting early, and getting others to do the already voted. However, they undermine this finding
same—all the campaign phenomena the book discuss- by noting that many of those who vote early decide
es. Some of this may reflect the fact that the better TV early on their candidate.
analysts are relying more on data and less on hunch so Finally at the end the authors get to what I suspect
they are getting more things right. However, a book was their main point all along—the impact of money
like this seems instantly dated. that gives candidates disproportionate access to media.
The book takes readers through the campaign On the last page, they lobby for giving candidates free
chronologically, and it analyzes public opinion data at access to media. They wish that both McCain and
every stage. There are discussions of voters’ early per- Obama had not rejected federal funding and the fiscal
ceptions of McCain as too old and erratic and of limits that accompany it. If anything a lesson of the
Obama as too inexperienced, and how they tried to 2008 campaign is that the federal cash isn’t worth the
implant these images of each other. The authors are limits for anyone who wants to win.
creating an historic record of all the campaign stages. I applaud the scholarship it took to compile the
However, I wondered why I was reading such detail on charts, graphs, and regressions because I believe that
the early factors that we all knew were irrelevant to the this will give this book eventual historical value. This
election’s outcome after the economic crisis. is a book for statisticians and scholars, not for readers

looking for revelations about how Obama won. The a major media player in terms of its media’s impacts at
biggest surprise to me was that all that analysis pro- corporate, national, and trans-national levels. The more
duced stunningly few surprises. The book contains diverse consumption within the EU also has to be con-
copious notes and an index. sidered, since media can reinforce or weaken cultural
—Eileen Wirth and political values.
Creighton University Rooke notes that media in Europe must be ana-
lyzed through two mirrors (p. xiv): the reflection of
Rooke, Richard. European Media in the Digital Age: political and social forces which the media reinforce
Analysis and Approaches. London and New York: and reorder, and the reflection and display of “a wider
Pearson Longman, 2009. Pp. 288. ISBN 978-1-4058- entertainment and ‘information’ network beyond
2197-1 (pb.) £25.99. national constraints” (ibid.) which he suggests, when
combined, provides for a communication network that
The continent of Europe and, of course, the is specifically created to be used by and for Europeans.
United Kingdom and Ireland are impossible to ignore He notes also that since the 1980s European govern-
with regard to media because each has a wide scope ments have realized the economic importance of the
that has become increasingly sizeable. Not only does media, since they have created both wealth and jobs as
some confusion remain about new or digital media— well as had a profound cultural influence on home and
and one must ask how much longer we can call these overseas audiences.
media “new media”—but this book sets out to look at The book’s chapters give both reading and analysis
new media’s global as well as European context and at aids along with the possibility of linking to the website
the international rulings and regulations that have of the book’s publishers where one can find additional
changed the ways in which media are judged and how materials. Chapters have “learning objectives” and
they behave. Distribution, production, and consump- “essentials” marked at their beginnings in order to rein-
tion have changed. We have new ways of looking at old force benchmarks laid down for teaching staff and stu-
media (online versions of newspapers, for instance) dents, and each chapter sets out to prove, disprove, dis-
and we can watch old media on new platforms (televi- cuss, and debate the hypotheses stated at the beginning
sion on mobile phones or computers, for example). The with the intention to aid the student’s own analysis of the
European Union has had a considerable effect on all of particular topic. While each section is divided into sub-
these facets of media. chapters, there are six main sections: Media Diversity,
Rooke notes that the media are important, impos- Internal and External Forces for Change, Media
ing, and influential, since they are sources of informa- Complexity, Multi-levels, The Integrative European
tion and values, that some media have changed more Environment, and Cultural Values. The chapters each
than others, but there are still differences in all media. have case studies, which demonstrate differing points of
Across the globe the signs of media convergence are view from a variety of academics and practitioners.
visible and more and more academic books have been There is an emphasis on the need to “stop and consider,”
published, and continue to be published, on interna- something which many undergraduate students seem to
tional and EU regulation, on comparative media, and have difficulty in doing. A number of alternative sources
on the internationalization of the media. Universities are offered and each chapter has a summary.
like my own have begun to open centers dedicated to The end of the book has a glossary of key terms,
media in specific areas, not just in Europe, but in and Rooke has gone so far as to offer us discussion
Africa, India, China, and the Arab context. While this questions that may be suitable for seminars and discus-
is seen as an attempt to de-westernize media, the surge sion groups. These are intended to concentrate the stu-
of such centers seems related to political situations: the dents’ minds on the key arguments that he offers here.
rise of the Chinese and Indian economies or the In addition, Rooke also offers some suggested assign-
increasing audience for Bollywood and Nollywood ments and some further reading as well as some online
movies in the diasporas. The EU is putting together a sources.
structure in which member states will gain significant This would be a useful resource for both students
outcomes from their own media and that of the other and teaching staff in universities offering media and
states and this applies to both old and new media. The communication courses, as well as those studying
EU cannot be ignored because it, like China or India, is political economy and European regulation/European

studies or comparative media systems as well as ture inscribes the world,” showing discourses in a par-
Politics and Policy and International Studies. ticular culture at a particular moment.
—Maria Way Williams reflects on the music video, he says, in
Communication and Media Research Institute the manner in which Merleau-Ponty looked at painting
University of Westminster, UK and Heidegger, the work of art. The questions he
attempts to answer are thus firstly around embodiment,
Williams, Kevin. Why I [Still] Want My MTV: Music technology, and the lifeworld, interrogating video, tel-
Video and Aesthetic Communication. (A book in the evision, and aesthetics. He comments that the book is
Critical Bodies series. Series editor, Joseph Pilotta). more descriptive than interpretive, noting that
Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press Inc., 2003. ISBN 1- Heidegger said that “it is always an interpretation in the
57273-344-6 (hbk.), $65.00; 1-57273-345-4 (pb.) sense that descriptions selects and explicates” (p. 9),
$26.50. and for this reason he considers some aspects of music
videos while neglecting others. His investigation is, he
For those of my generation—I was a teenager in suggests, a phenomenological one, in that, following
the 1960s—the music lives on and on. I am constant- Spiegelberg (1975), he focuses on three experiential
ly amazed that the students I teach are still listening to areas:
the music to which I listened and sit open-mouthed • the significance of things, like sights and sounds,
when, during classes, I can tell them that I saw Jimi that are normally thought of as being only subjec-
Hendrix, The Rolling Stones, The Pretty Things, tive, that are brought to light;
Cream, and other bands live—and I refused tickets to • meanings and values, here the aesthetic values
see the Beatles (we all make mistakes!). While there “grounded by concrete experience” (p. 10), i.e., in
were music programs on television, it was not really the presentations of music tv; and
until the 1970s and what was probably the first real • the sketching of the cultural lifeworld that is
music video, Queen’s Bohemian Rhapsody, that sensed.
music videos became so important. With the launch of The book, he writes, explores how sound and music
the music video channel MTV in 1981, and of the become a visual logos through which an underlying
other channels made possible by cable and satellite logic is presented. But he also notes that the visual can-
television, videos became really big business. In his not be ignored, and he questions the idea that the visu-
book, Williams writes not just of MTV, as one might al is all important. He notes that “Music videos present
expect from the title of the book, but of all of the var- an aural-visual aesthetic in which music and dance
ious channels in which this new medium has changed have replaced Hollywood narrative and television real-
television, music, film and video themselves, adver- ism as the logos of video” (p. 13).
tising, and fashion. MTV (as he prefers to call all Following an introductory chapter in which the
music television) has been perceived “as a phenome- book’s problematic is discussed and the previous
non of postindustrial popular culture and the com- notions and suggestions made about music television
plexity of its conceptualization” (p. 4).The book, in and video are considered, the second chapter focuses
the Critical Bodies series, has the task, as have the on music and style; the biases of the designers, backers,
others in this series, of creating a place where both and developers; sociocultural and institutional condi-
linguistic and nonlinguistic sense and sensibilities can tions; and the political and economic restraints through
be articulated around the ways in which organizations which the aesthetics of the music video are developed.
and institutions and, indeed, we ourselves, rethink our The third chapter develops an argument on the
bodies and the ways in which we can critique such ways in which pre-existing media forms were and are
organizations through our own bodies. Williams incorporated into the particular style of music video,
attempts here to propose new ways of considering demonstrating the metaphysics of the institutions that
music video from the viewpoints of Communicology make and show the videos and the historical discourse
(which he suggests is the discipline that studies the that surrounds media and mediation. The fourth chap-
discourse of human communication, p. 5) and cultur- ter looks at the way in which MTV was initially struc-
al studies. He is interested in contemplating how tured as the first “all surfing channel,” one with a very
music video can reveal the structures of communica- different flow to that of most channels. He begins to
tion consciousness, thus demonstrating how “a cul- discern how a musical visuality can start to be articu-

lated through the ways in which this temporal flow of with all its cultural and physiological
material was structured. In the fifth chapter Williams dimensions. (pp. 207-208)
not only explains theories of style and communication, The echos, mentioned above, is the word he has devel-
and contemplates music and style; he also suggests oped which condenses and expresses a “constellation
ways in which the cultural visual bias of the West is of ideas” (p. 210); the term is a combination of logos
limited and how, multisensually, aesthetics can be and echoes and has a double meaning, the mode of tele-
rethought. This perceived Western cultural bias is visual-video address, with its combination of sight,
picked up again in Chapter 6 where he uses metaphors sound, writing, speaking, orality and literacy, hearing,
to talk about how we “see” the world. This moves on and listening—a multimedia presentation, in fact.
into the next chapter which looks at Realism and Echos also, he says, speaks of a “body of overlapping
Hyperreality and the conventions that are used when and interpenetrating experience” (p. 211). The idea that
music is presented on television and the differences there are many logics of television and this multilay-
between these conventions and the hyperrealism of ered “radical of televisual presentation” (p. 210) is
music video. Williams suggests that this change of con- what his notion of echos represents.
vention has also changed the music performers them- The book finishes with an appendix which is, in
selves and the ways in which music is performed, pro- actuality, an outline chapter describing work on phe-
ducing what he describes as “musical visuality.” nomenology and communication and relating this to
Chapter 8 features a discussion of the possibility the work of the book. There is an extensive bibliogra-
of a new aesthetics of television and the dominant phy (pp. 263-280) and the book is well-referenced.
thought lines that have, or have not, been crossed in While this book is erudite and Williams has evi-
thought today. Music video, he suggests, has made a dently given the topic a great deal of consideration and
new way of thinking around aesthetics and communica- has done an enormous amount of research, and while it
tion available to us. He rethinks, in this chapter, notions would be a useful book for anyone interested in music
around aesthetics, aistethes, and synesthesia. I do think, television or phenomenological research to read, I am
however, that his statement on page16 that “It is via this not entirely sure that I agree with his thesis here. He has
aesthetic style that music video’s contribution to the his- said that the difference between music video and, say,
tory of communication, and our understanding of the musical theatre, is that music video is not narrative in
world, is as profound as Picasso’s paintings or the same sense. I would put forward the notion that each
Einstein’s theories of relativity” is perhaps a little over- music video does indeed tell a story—the story of the
stated. While I can agree that the music video may have song—although it may not tell it in quite the same way.
had as much, if not more effect on our aesthetic sensi- To return to the Thriller video, this drew strongly on an
bilities as Picasso’s paintings, although more people aesthetic that had already been developed, that of the
have probably seen Michael Jackson’s Thriller video zombie movie, and told a story. It did not develop its
than have seen a Picasso painting, I cannot see that it is own aesthetic, but showcased the work of a very, very
in Einstein’s league, important as aesthetics are in our successful artist, who seemed to have some control over
lives. Oddly, Chapter 9 provides, Williams says, a theo- his own output. His individual success allowed him to
retical background to Chapter 8 and moves on to make such videos (this one is, I believe, still the most
attempt to develop a new communication theory based successful music video ever) as the industry, the institu-
on Heidegger’s and Merleau-Ponty’s aesthetics. tion, were only too glad to go along with it.
Chapter 10 looks at the logos and what he describes as Despite my misgivings, this book is well worth
the echos. Music video, he suggests: reading and Kevin Williams is to be congratulated on
reveals in a new and concrete way the the range of his research.
synesthetic dimension of embodied con- —Maria Way
sciousness, the interplay of sight and sound Communication and Media Research Institute
as an expressive as well as perceptive expe- University of Westminster, UK
rience, and the ability for cultural forms
(such as music and dance) to be deployed in Reference
various and multiple fields of expression. Spiegelberg, H. (1975) Doing phenomenology: Essays on
The technique itself is no more and no less and in phenomenology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhof.
than this particular way of expressing per-
ception, with all of its ambiguity and excess,

Hellmueller, L. C., & Aeschbacher, N. (2010) .

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Hellmueller, L. C., & Aeschbacher, N. (2010) .

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Hellmueller, L. C., & Aeschbacher, N. (2010) .

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Centre for the Study of Communication and Culture

Volume 29 (2010) No. 4

Media and Celebrity:

A QUARTERLY REVIEW OF COMMUNICATION RESEARCH

Book Reviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35

2 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 3

4 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

2. Historical Approach: From Alexander the Great to Reality TV Celebrities

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 5

6 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 7

Time Period Celebrity Fame and Change in Society

Table 1. Origin and transformation of the Celebrity concept

8 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 9

10 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 11

12 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 13

14 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 15

16 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 17

18 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

1 Lady Gaga (ladygaga) 6,752,203 147,126 31 months ago

2 Britney Spears (britneyspears) 6,139,076 417,468 25months ago

3 Ashton Kutcher (aplusk) 5,926,756 612 21 months ago

4 Justin Bieber (justinbieber) 5,714,396 87,025 19 months ago

5 Barack Obama (BarackObama) 5,653,466 712,163 44 months ago

6 Ellen DeGeneres (TheEllenShow) 5,349,677 49,647 26 months ago

7 Kim Kardashian (KimKardashian) 5,080,319 94 19 months ago

8 Taylor Swift (taylorswift13) 4,414,166 48 23months ago

9 Oprah Winfrey (Oprah) 4,407,648 19 21 months ago

10 Katy Perry (katyperry) 4,268,730 63 20 months ago

Table 2. Ranking of the most followed Twitter profiles (Twitaholic, 2010)

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 19

20 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 21

22 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 23

24 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 25

6. Research Prospectives for Media Celebrity Scholars

26 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 27

28 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 29

30 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 31

32 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 33

34 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 35

36 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 37

38 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 — 39

40 — VOLUME 29 (2010) NO. 4 COMMUNICATION RESEARCH TRENDS