Mohd Yazid S Hamid
Mohd Yazid S Hamid
Mohd Yazid S Hamid
NOVEMBER 2007
P.PP1jSTA<ApN
UNIVEIR,31TI MALAYSIA RHAfl3
No. PorokThan No Panggil
037929.
Tarikh
2099
V
ABSTRACT
ABSTRAK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Background 1
1.2 Objectives 2
1.3 Scopes of Work 2
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 History and Overview of Vehicle Structure Types 3
2.1.1 Grillage Frame 4
2.1.2 Backbone Structure 5
2.1.3 Triangulated Tube Structure 6
2.1.4 Incorporation of Roll Cage into Structure 7
2.1.5 Pure Monoque 7
2.1.6 Punt or Platform Structure 8
2.1.7 Perimeter Space Frame or Birdcage Frame 9
2.1.8 Integral or Unitary Body Structure io
2.2 Computer modeling 10
2.2.1 Solid Model 10
viii
3 METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction 22
3. 1.1 Flow Process 23
3.2 Preliminary Design 23
3.3 Detail Design 24
3.4 Analyze 24
3.5 Fabrication 24
3.6 Evaluation 25
REFERENCES 35
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF APPENDICES
INTRODUCTION
By looking on the transporting system used in most of golf courses and some
of large industries, comes an idea of using a buggy as a transport to reduce this
problem. A buggy is a small light weight vehicle that has been developed for the
purpose of carrying load, burden and also transporting people.
In this project, a small buggy frame will be build. This frame will acts as a
foundation to the buggy that will be build for the purpose of carrying burden and
load within the compound of University Malaysia Pahang factory or indoor used.
This buggy will be design to transport 2 persons in one time and it also will use
electric motor instead of conventional engine. This also satisfied its objective which
this buggy will be used within the University Malaysia Pahang compound and for
indoor used because there are no pollution if electric motor is used.
By considering these needs, the frame for this buggy has to be designed to
Perfectly fit with all the parts and components that will be used like electric motor,
2
electronic controller, brakes and etc. This frame also has to be designed to
withstand the load from all the parts, the passengers and burden it carries.
1.2 Objective
LITERATURE REVIEW
Many different structures of cars have been used since the invention cars over
the years. In the 1920s, the standard car configuration was the separate 'body-on-
chassis'. The chassis frame was perfectly suited for mounting the semi-elliptic
spring on the beam axle suspensions system. The structure of the car which is the
underfloor chassis frame consisted of a more or less flat 'ladder frame' like as shown
in Figure 1. Two open side frame with' the full length of the vehicle is connected
with the frame by open section cross-members and riveted at 90' joints.
This chassis frames, are particularly flexible locally in torsion. But the
transferred bending moments from the ends of members into torsion in the attached
members are poor due to the riveted T-joints. Thus, the chassis frames had very low
torsion stiffness and because of the importance of torsion, the situation is not very
satisfactory. The depth of the structure was limited to a shallow frame underneath
the body, so that the bending stiffness was also relatively low. Good torsional design
is important to prevent the incapability between body and frame and the torsion
stiffness is often used as one of the benchmarks of the structural competence of a
vehicle structure. In the, case of a flexible body on a flexible body on a relatively
stiff chassis frame, most of the torsion load would pass through the chassis and if the
body were stiff and the chassis flexible, then the body would carry a larger
proportion of the torsional load. The major grillage member in the passenger
compartment floor consists principally of 'transmission tunnel', one or more cross-
members, the rockers (as part of the sideframe) and the bulkheads at the ends of the
compartment [2]. These members, in idealized form are shown in Figure 2.
5
Loaded
out of Cross-member
Transmission plane
tunnel \ /
Bulkhead
Rocker— Bending
(sideframe) moment
:I:71
Torque
Active member -
internal forces Shear force
••__-.-'z1
45 c)
The best way of using the tube principle is to make the tube encompass the
whole car body. This is shown in Figure 5. The triangulated roll cage extends to the
passengers compartment. This make the cross-sectional area of the body very large
hence the torsion constant is large also. The contribution of the roll cage depended
on:
Figure 5: Triangulated sports car structure with integrated roll cage [2].
Monoque in French means single shell. In this structure, the outer skin
Performs the dual role of the body surface and structure. This type of structures is
very rare compare to other structures. The used is restricted to racing cars only as
shown in Figure 6. This is because of certain reasons which are:
This structure usually is from sheet metal construction which the floor
members are large closed section and with a good joint between members. It is like a
grillage structure of members with high torsion and bending properties. This
structure always used for low production volume vehicles which the body styles or
rapid model are required. Figure 7 is an example of Punt chassis.
Figure 7: Punt chassis [2].
In this structure, relatively small section tubular members are built into stiff
jointed ring beam bays welded together at joints or nodes. The individual open bay
ring frames is not weight efficient shear structure. If the shear stiffness of the skin
panels is incorporated into this type of body, it becomes integral structure and a
considerable increase in torsional rigidity is usually observed, depending on the
stiffness of the attachment. An example of perimeter or birdcage frame is the Audi
A2 aluminum vehicle as shown in Figure 8.
10
This type of structure is the most widely used in modem car structure type.
The body is self supporting so that the separate chassis omitted with a saving in
weight. The first integral car bodies were introduced in the 1930s. The integral body
is a mixture of the monocoque and the birdcage types. The body forms a closed box
torsion structure which results in high stiffness. The panels and body components in
this structure are stamped from sheet metal and fixed together mostly by spot
welding, clinching, laser welding or other methods. The beam members are formed
out of folded or pressed sheet steel shapes and welded together. A notable example
was the Citroen 11 CV, shown in Figure 9.
Final chassis geometry that resulted from sketch and analysis was used to
Produce a solid model constructed by using Solidworks. This solid model represents
what the chassis will look like when it is constructed which was useful for surfacing
the body shell, checking components clearances and spacing, verifying vision
11
The computerized structural analysis techniques have become the key link
between structural design and computer-aided drafting. However because the small
size of the elements usually prevents an overall view, the automation of the analysis
tend to mask the significance of the major structural scantlings. A series of finite
element analyses ensued after the creation of preliminary model. Excessive high
local stresses and deflections were reduced and material thicknesses were optimized
in an iterative manner which was especially helpful in optimizing the front and rear
space frame [3]. A fine mesh analysis will give an accurate stress and deflection
prediction, course mesh can give a degree in structural feel useful in the later stage of
conceptual design. The principal steps in the FEA process are:
The first stage is getting the static and dynamic stiffness and from here,
comes structural refinement and optimization based on load inputs and also projected
torsional and bending stiffness. The key factor in a vehicle body analysis and
modeling is joint stiffness which involves in modifying the local properties of the
main beam elements of a structural frame.
12
23 Chassis Design
The vehicle chassis links the mounting points for vehicle's front suspension,
steering, engine, transmission, rear suspension, final drive, fuel tank, seat for
occupants, and in this case, motor controller, electric motor and batteries[3]. The
chassis requires toughness to sustain punishing fatigue loads from the road, power
unit and the driver. There are several parameters needs to be considered during the
chassis phase design. These parameters include:
L Passenger Accommodation
ii. Materials for fabrication
iii. Battery Housings
iv. Packaging
Ergonomics play a vital role in the design and to accommodate the needs of
the passengers, the chassis' mid-monoque was designed to provide ample space for
comfort and clear visibility [3]. Rough passenger compartment dimensions and
measurement are taken followed by the measurements for the seat car and this will
be used as a general layout for compartment of the car. This also will help in
deciding the distance between the front tires to the rear tire beside the distance from
front to rear firewall.
Advantages of steel:
i. -low cost
ii. -Ease of forming
iii. -Consistency of supply
iv. -Corrosion resistance with zinc coatings
V. -Ease ofjoining
vi. -Recyclable
vii. -Good crash energy absorption
Disadvantages
Higher strength steel with wide range of yield strength values can to
1 200Mpa. Designs can be suitably modified to either improve performance at
existing thickness or down gauge with strength related parts. Although stiffness
remains unaltered it is possible to offset decreased torsional rigidity. The full range
of steels used in automotive design from the forming grades with a minimum yield of
1 40N/mm2.
Under pure vertical bending load, square tube is stiffer than round tube. This
is important because this design does not have a roof to stiffen the passenger's
14
2.4.1 Stiffness
The torsional stiffness of the chassis was determined by using rigid beams to
conservatively model all suspension geometry while the rear wheels were held fixed.
The angle difference between the front and rear axles is determined by using the
displacement results. An over designed chassis is acceptable but an under designed
chassis could be devastating. The stiffness of an ideal unitized structure is
Proportional to the square of the distance of the components from the centerline [6].