Capital Budgeting Final Case

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

CAPITAL BUDGETING PROBLEMS

CASE 1

Calvin Inc. is considering the purchase of a new state-of-art machine to replace its hand-operated
machine. Calvin's effective tax rate is 40%, and its cost of capital is 12%. Data regarding the existing and
new machines are presented below.

Existing Machine New Machine


Original Cost 50,000 90,000
Instillation Cost 0 4,000
Freight and Insurance 0 6,000
Expected end salvage value 0 0
Depreciation method Straight-line Straight-line
Expected useful life 10 years 5 years

The existing machine has been in service for five years and could be sold currently for P25,000. Calvin
expects to realize annual before-tax reductions in labor costs of P30,000 if the new machine is purchased
and placed in service.

QUESTIONS

1.) If the new machine is purchased, what is the net amount of the initial cash outflow at Time 0 for
net present value calculation purposes?
2.) If the new machine is purchased, the incremental cash flows for the first year would amount to ?
3.) If the new machine is purchased, the incremental cash flows for the fifth year would amount to ?

CASE 2

Olson Industries needs to add a small plant to accommodate a special contract to supply building
materials over a five year period. The required initial cash outlays at Time 0 are as follows.

Land P 500,000
New building 2,000,000
Equipment 3,000,000

Olson uses straight-line depreciation for tax purposes and will depreciate the building over 10 years and
the equipment over 5 years. Olson’s effective tax rate is 40%. Revenues from the special contract are
estimated at P1.2 million annually, and cash expenses are estimated at P300,000 annually.

At the end of the fifth year, the assumed sales values of the land and building are P800,000 and P500,000,
respectively. It is further assumed the equipment will be removed at a cost of P50,000 and sold for
P300,000.

1. As Olson utilizes the net present value (NPV) method to analyze investments, the net cash flow for
period 3 would be ?
2. As Olson utilizes the net present value (NPV) method to analyze investments, the net cash flow for
period 5 would be ?
CASE 3 – Selection of Individual Projects

Hobart Corporation evaluates capital projects using a variety of performance screens; including a hurdle
rate of 16%, payback period of 3 years or less, and an accounting rate of return of 20% or more.
Management is completing review of a project on the basis of the following projections.

• Capital investment P200,000


• Annual cash flows P74,000
• Straight-line depreciation 5 years
• Terminal value P20,000

The projected internal rate of return is 20%

1. Using Internal Rate of Return, should the project be accepted?


2. Using Payback Period, should the project be accepted ?

CASE 4 – Selection of Mutually Exclusive Projects

Diane Harper, Vice President of Finance for BGN Industries, is reviewing material prepared by her staff
prior to the board of directors meeting at which she must recommend one of four mutually exclusive
options for a new product line. The summary information below indicates the initial investment required,
the present value of cash inflows (excluding the initial investment) at BGN’s hurdle rate of 16%, and the
internal rate of return (IRR) for each of the four options

Option Investment Present Value of IRR


Cash Inflows at 16%
X 3,950,000 3,800,000 15.5%
Y 3,000,000 3,750,000 19.0%
Z 2,000,000 2,825,000 17.5%
W 800,000 1,100,000 18.0%

If there are no capital rationing constraints, which option should Harper recommend?

CASE 5 – Capital Rationing

Lewis Services is evaluating six investment opportunities (projects). The following table reflects each
project’s net present value (NPV) and the respective initial investments required. All of these projects are
independent.

Project NPV Investment


R 5,000 10,000
S 5,000 5,000
T 8,000 40,000
U 15,000 60,000
V 15,000 75,000
W 3,000 15,000

Lewis has an investment constraint of P100,000. Which combination of projects would represent the
optimal investment that should be recommended to Lewis Services’ management?

You might also like