Arj 3405
Arj 3405
Abstract
High temperature and salinity are the major climatic factors affecting the productivity of rice.
Combined effect of both the stresses can cause severe yield reduction in rice. Therefore, objective of
this study was to assess the combined effect of high temperature and salinity on three rice genotypes
(MO-16 - popular high yielding variety; N-22 - tolerant to high temperature and drought and NL-44 -
tolerant to high temperature). The experiment was laid out in completely randomized design with
three replications. The three genotypes of rice were grown in non-saline conditions at optimum
temperature until booting stage. At booting stage, plants were irrigated with 250mM NaCl for three
days and exposed to high temperature (38ºC) for 10 days. High temperature combined with salinity
significantly affected the physiological processes and yield parameters. Tolerant genotype, N-22
showed higher proline content, cell membrane stability index, superoxide dismutase activity, pollen
viability, spikelet fertility percentage, yield per plant and less malondialdehyde content and Na+/K+
ratio compared to other genotypes.
Keywords: High temperature, Interactive effect, Physiological traits, Rice, Salinity
784
These differences may be due to the genetic control
Table 1. Variation in physio-morphological and yield traits under combined stress of highest tolerated level of high temperature (Th) and salinity (Sh) levels
G =0.800; T=
0.979; G×T =
of the trait. On contrary, reduction in plant height under
Yield per
plant (g/
14.833
21.50a
12.50b
10.50c
plant)
1.385
5.666
4.75b
6.75a
5.50b
temperature stress is due to decreased cell growth
especially cell elongation (Vijayakumar et al., 2021).
Zinn et al. (2010) reported that high temperature stress
mainly affect the reproductive stage.
G = 2.939; T=
3.599; G×T =
viability (%)
73.205
93.016
Pollen
74.52b
a
90.91b
93.66a
94.48a
The highest number of productive tillers under
65.97c
5.090
79.12
control conditions were found in MO-16 (15.6) whereas,
N-22 plants had the highest productive tiller number
(5.5) under combined stress treatments. The difference
G =2.714; T=
3.324; G×T =
percentage
in the productive tiller number between the genotypes
Spikelet
fertility
51.075
82.256
62.82a
b
86.57a
82.61b
31.87c
77.58c
4.701
58.52
(%)
under the control conditions was greater as compared
to the plants grown under combined stress treatments.
Salinity adversely affects a number of yield elements
including the panicles, tillers and spikelets per plant,
G = N/S ; T=
Superoxide
activity (g-1
0.036; G×T
dismutase
=0.063
floret sterility, individual size of grain, and even delayed
min-1)
0.37
0.42
0.34
0.38
0.23
0.24
0.29
0.26
heading (Grattan et al., 2002). Increasing temperatures
from 24 to 32°C resulted in reductions in tiller number
in rice (Harsant et al., 2013).
Na+ - K+ ratio
G =0.07 ; T=
0.057 ; G×T
Under combined stress condition, highest proline
=0.099
0.72a
0.69a
0.30b
0.29b
0.46c
0.57
0.42
0.54
content was recorded by N-22 (27.33 µg/g), followed
by NL-44 (26.12 µg/g) and MO-16 (24.76 µg/g).
Under control condition, highest proline content was
Control condition
recorded by N-22 (24.90 µg/g), followed by NL-44
Chlorophyll
0.201 ; G×T
G =N/S ; T=
a/b ratio
Th x Sh
= N/S
(23.48 µg/g) and MO-16 (19.97 µg/g). Average proline
1.23
1.07
1.01
1.10
2.07
2.08
2.01
2.05
content under control condition was 22.79 µg/g and
under stress condition was 26.07 µg/g. Salinity and
high temperature induced an accumulation of proline
T=0.111 ; G×T
Malondial-
(mmol g-1)
G = 0.136;
in rice leaves. In fact, the accumulation of amino acids
content
dehyde
= 0.192
a
b
2.13c
2.39
0.96
0.94
1.04
0.98
2.63
2.42
in plants has been widely reported as a response to
salinity and temperature (Dadkhah and Rassam, 2016).
The increase in proline content may be due to osmotic
regulation. Some plants are able to stand salinity by
membrane
index (%)
stability
10.556
b
69.17a
60.197
G = 0.970 ; T=
0.792 ; G×T
agreement with other results on wheat seedling treated
content
Proline
=1.372
(µg/g)
27.33a
b
24.90a
23.48b
c
19.97c
26.07
22.79
24.76
26.12
15.60a
4.500
8.933
0.944
5.50a
b
6.60b
c
4.60c
3.50
4.50
100.00b
122.00a
b
111.00
111.00
c
110.00
Plant
=N/S
98.00
MO-16
NL-44
NL-44
Mean
N-22
N-22
786
of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39(1): carbohydrates, proteins and amino acids. Biologia
205-07. Plantarum 37: 399-404.
Beauchamp C and Fridovich I 1971. Superoxide dismutase: Harsant J, Pavlovic L, Chiu G, Sultmanis S and Sage T L
improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide 2013. High temperature stress and its effect on pollen
gels. Anal biochem 44(1): 276-87. development and morphological components of harvest
index in the C3 model grass Brachypodium distachyon. J
Beena R, Thandapani V and Babu R C 2012. Physio-
Exp Bot 64(10): 2971-83.
morphological and biochemical characterization of
selected recombinant inbred lines of rice for drought Hatfield J L and Prueger J H 2015. Temperature extremes:
resistance. Indian J Plant Physiol 17(2): 189-93. effect on plant growth and development. Weather Clim
Extrem 10: 4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001
Beena R, Vighneswaran V, Sindumole P, Narayankutty M C
and Voleti S R 2018. Impact of high temperature stress Hiscox J D and Israelstam G F 1979. A method for the
during reproductive and grain filling stage in rice. Oryza- extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without
An Int J Rice 55(1): 126-33. maceration. Canadian Journal of Botany 57(12): 1332-
34.
Beena R, Veena V, Jaslam M P K, Nithya N and Adarsh V
S 2021.Germplasm innovation for high temperature Huang Z, Zhao L, Chen D, Liang M, Liu Z, Shao H and Long
tolerance from traditional rice accessions of Kerala using X 2013. Salt stress encourages proline accumulation
genetic variability, genetic advance, path coefficient by regulating proline biosynthesis and degradation in
analysis and principal component analysis. J Crop Sci Jerusalem artichoke plantlets. PloS one 8(4): 62-85.
Biotech https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-021-00103-7 Ismail A M and Horie T 2017. Genomics, physiology, and
Blum A and Ebercon A 1981. Cell membrane stability as a molecular breeding approaches for improving salt
measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 68:405–34
Sci 21(1): 43-47. Jagadish S V, Craufurd P Q and Wheeler T R 2007. High
Bowler C, Van Montagu M and Inze D 1992. Superoxide temperature stress and spikelet fertility in rice (Oryza
dismutase and stress tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Physiol sativa L.). J Exp Bot 58: 1627–35. doi: 10.1093/jxb/
Plant Mol Biol 43: 83-116. erm003
Calderini D F, Reynolds M P and Slafer G A 2006. Source-sink Kishor P K, Sangam S, Amrutha R N, Laxmi P S, Naidu K R, Rao
effects on grain weight of bread wheat, durum wheat, and K R, Rao S, Reddy K J, Theriappan P and Sreenivasulu
triticale at different locations. Aust J Agric Res 57: 227– N 2005. Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation,
33. doi: 10.1071/AR05107 uptake and transport in higher plants: its implications in
plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Curr Sci 88(3):
Chaudhury A M, Letham S, Craig S and Dennis E S 1993. 424-38.
amp1‐a mutant with high cytokinin levels and altered
embryonic pattern, faster vegetative growth, constitutive Kreiner M, Harvey L M and McNeil B 2002. Oxidative
photomorphogenesis and precocious flowering. Plant J stress response of a recombinant Aspergillus niger to
4(6): 907-16 exogenous menadione and H2O2 addition. Enzyme
Microb Technol 30: 346-53.
Dadkhah A and Rassam G 2016. Effect of salinity on
photosynthesis and leaf carbohydrate content in two Pradhan G P, Prasad P V V, Fritz A K, Kirkham M B and Gill
wheats (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars. Jordan J Agric B S 2012. Effects of drought and high temperature stress
Sci 12: 467-78. on synthetic hexaploid wheat. Functional Plant Biology
39: 190-98
Fageria N K, Stone L F and Santos A B 2012. Breeding for
salinity tolerance. In Plant breeding for abiotic stress Pravallika K, Arunkumar C, Vijayakumar A, Beena R and
tolerance, Fritsche-Neto R and Borém A (eds.). Springer- Jayalekshmy V G 2020. Effect of high temperature stress
Verlag Berlin: Heidelberg, pp. 103–22. on seed filling and nutritional quality of rice (Oryza sativa
L.). Journal of Crop and Weed 16(2): 18-23
Farooq M, Bramley H, Palta J A and Siddique K H M 2011.
Heat stress in wheat during reproductive and grain- Radi A A, Farghaly F A and Hamada A M 2013. Physiological
filling phases. Crit Rev Plant Sci 30: 491–507. doi: and biochemical responses of salt-tolerant and salt-
10.1080/07352689.2011.615687 sensitive wheat and bean cultivars to salinity. J Biol Earth
Sci 3: 72-88.
Ghafiyehsanj E, Dilmaghani K and Shoar H H 2013. The effects
of salicylic acid on some of biochemical characteristics of Rahman M S, Halloran G M and Wilson J H 1978. Genetic
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salinity stress. Annals control of spikelet number per ear with particular reference
Biological Res 4: 242-48 to rate of spikelet initiation in hexaploid wheat, Triticum
aestivum L. Euphytica 27: 69–74
Grattan S, Zeng L, Shannon M and Roberts S 2002. Rice is
more sensitive to salinity than previously thought. Calif Ray D K, Mueller N D, West P C and Foley J A 2013. Yield
Agric 56(6): 189-98. trends are insufficient to double global crop production by
2050. PLoS ONE 8: e66428.
Hamada A M and Khulaef E M 1995. Effect of salinity and
heat-shock on wheat seedling growth and content of Reddy A R, Chaitanya K V and Vivekanandan M 2004.
787
Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and 199–223. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.011
antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J Plant Physiol
Wang Y S, Ding D M, Pang Y, Gu XG, Gao L P and Xia T 2013.
161(11): 1189-1202.
Analysis of interfering substances in the measurement of
Reshna O P and Beena R. 2021. Salinity tolerance malondialdehyde content in plant leaves. Asian J Chem
mechanisms in rice-a review. Ind J Agric Res 1-8. 25(11).
Sairam R K, Rao V K and Srivastava G C 2002. Differential Xu S, Li J, Zhang X, Wei H and Cui L 2006. Effects of heat
response of wheat genotypes to long term salinity stress acclimation pretreatment on changes of membrane lipid
in relation to oxidative stress, antioxidant activity and peroxidation, antioxidant metabolites, and ultrastructure
osmolyte concentration. Plant Sci 163: 1037-46 of chloroplasts in two cool-season turfgrass species
under heat stress. Environ Exp Bot 56: 274–85.
Vijayakumar A, Shanija S, Beena R, Sarada S, Sajitha R T,
Roy S, Manju R V and Viji M M 2021. High temperature Zasoski R J and Burau R G 1977. A rapid nitric‐perchloric
induced changes in quality and yield parameters of tomato acid digestion method for multielement tissue
(Solanum lycopersicum L.) and similarity coefficients analysis. Commun. Soil Sci Plant Anal 8(5): 425-36
among genotypes using SSR markers. Heliyon 7(2):
Zinn K E, Tunc-Ozdemir M and Harper J F 2010. Temperature
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05988.
stress and plant sexual reproduction uncovering the
Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M and Foolad M R 2007. Heat weakest links. J Exp Bot 61(10): 1959–68.
tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ Exp Bot 61:
788