Ashok M TDSAT

Challenges of Regulation
in a Digital Era
The Indian TV Market Today
India Has a Large Television Market, Dominated by Cable
Millions of Homes Served Great Service at Nominal Cost
• 140 million TV Households Over 700 TV Channels

A Thriving
+ Consumer +
• 91 million Cable TV Homes Average payments per
Driven household:
Market
• 40 million DTH Homes. Rs. 150 to 180/‐
Cable likely to grow to over 110 million homes by 2014

Distribution Platforms
Terrestrial Direct ‐ To‐

Cable Networks IPTV
Broadcasting Home
DAS ( Digital Addressable

Systems )
NON‐DAS ( Analogue Bouquets)

Overview of the TV Distribution Industry
Value Chain in India
Cable Network Services Value Chain
Broadcaster Aggregator MSO LCO Consumer
The channels seen on TV (“pay” channels or “free to air (FTA)” channels) are created by different broadcasters
and aggregated by content distribution companies. They are transmitted via satellite to head‐ends owned by
Multi System Operators(MSOS). The MSOs in turn re‐transmit these signals through cables to the Local Cable
Operators, who have their own “last mile” cable network to individual homes or through their own direct points.
Independent Cable Operators(ICO) operate their own networks as small MSOs using same mode of
transmission
transmission. The market overall has 10 national MSOs 1 000 ICOs
1,000 ICOs, and 60000 LCOs
LCOs.
DTH/Satellite Service Value Chain
Broadcaster
d Aggregator DTH Operator Consumer
IPTV Service Value Chain

IPTV Services
Broadcaster Aggregator Consumer
Provider
TRAI as Cable / Broadcast Regulator
¾ Cable Television/Broadcasting Services were brought under Telecom
Regulatory Authority of India in January 2004.
¾ A Fast track judicial body (Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal

– TDSAT) was made available for settlement of disputes between
broadcasters and MSOs /cable operators.
¾ The Cable Rules 1994 were amended in 2006 empowering Government to

License CAS MSOS/ICOs and TRAI to issue new customer friendly CAS
Regulations. This led to successful implementation of CAS in 2006 in parts of
three metros and in Chennai
Chennai.
¾ TRAI’s key roles on Regulating the Broadcast and Cable Industry include
powers for :
• Interconnect regulations and Revenue Share methodology
• Tariff Orders
• Quality of Service norms
¾ TRAI also recommends policy initiatives to Government. A recent example is

the revolutionary Digital Blueprint of August 2010.
Digital Blueprint of MIB
• In August 2010, TRAI proposed sweeping reforms of the Cable Sector by

proposing to ban analogue transmission of cable TV signals in a time
bound manner.
• q
This required Government to make major
j changes
g to the Cable Act
especially u/s 4A of the Cable Act.
• TRAI also wanted to reform the cable registration process by introducing

licensing of cable sector.
• Government accepted the recommendations which led to vital

amendments of Cable Act in October 2011 which Parliament approved in
December 2011.
• A four phase notification was issued in November 2011.

Digitalisation Time Line of MIB
The Ministry of Information & Broadcasting (MIB) has set the sunset timeline for Analog
cable services and achieve 100% Digitalization – Digital Addressable System (DAS)
implementation
p
4 Metro’s
Phase 1 30th June, 2012
All One Million Plus Cities

Phase 2 by 31 March, 2013
All Municipalities & Municipal

Phase 3 Corporations‐ by September 2014
Rest
30 September
Of India , 2014
Phase 4 31 December, 2014
Task Force has been set up by Ministry of I&B and meetings are being held
for Digital Addressable System implementation on a regular basis
Regulatory Challenges For Digital Era
¾ The Cable Industry will have to invest about Rs. 25000 crores to convert 90 million
analogue homes to digital.
¾ Uneven FDI of 49% for cable and 74% for HITS makes for uneven level playing field.
FDI needs to be harmonised for cable industry.
industry
¾ Finance Ministry is still to provide tax incentives to enable Cable Industry to meet the
enormous challenge of digitalisation in a defined time frame.
¾ TRAI has issued a detailed 93 page consultation paper posing 27 questions on
December 22 and is completing the consultation process by holding an Open House
in Mumbai on February 24,2012.
¾ Keyy issues pposed for reply
p y are:
• Number / Composition / Price / Ala carte in Basic Tier
• Should Retail Tariff be determined by TRAI or left for market forces and how it should
be determined.
• Should Interconnect Regulations be modified & should TRAI determine revenue
share between MSO & LCO.
• Should Must Carry be mandated for MSOs?
• Should Carriage Fees be regulated for DAS systems?
Regulatory Challenges For Digital Era
• Do Respondents agree with QoS norms and Redressal of Consumer Grievances for
DAS systems?
• Who
h should
h ld be b responsible
bl for
f ensuring standards d d off QoS with h respect to
connection, disconnection , transfer, shifting, no signal complaints, STB billing and
Redressal of Consumer Grievances?
• Should billing be done by MSO or LCO? Should prepaid billing be introduced in DAS
systems?
• Should there be separate tariff and Interconnection Regulation for Ad free

channels and what should be the revenue share between Broadcaster &
Distributor?
• It is historic to note that over 84 responses have been received from

Broadcasters, MSOs , ICOs , Cable Operators , DTH and Consumer Organizations.
TRAI is
i expected
t d to
t announce the
th DAS regulatory
l t f
frameworkk latest
l t t by
b mid
id March
M h
2012.
Digitization A Mammoth Task
• Digitalizing 140 million Cable TV customers by 2014 is a huge task.
• Progressive Digitalization with addressability of Pay channels can be first Step

towards complete digital India.
• Good policy framework can accelerate the process.
• DTH dominant in Digital delivery. Cable needs level playing field to compete
effectively.
• A clear consensus roadmap for smooth transition to DAS in a transparent and well
controlled
t ll d implementation
i l t ti is
i necessary to
t ensure that
th t DAS does
d nott falter.
f lt
• To ensure this, serious and speedy actions are required.

Action required for Digital Success
• Cable Rules 2012 need to be urgently gazetted. Guidelines for DAS licensees and
new entrants should be simple and transparent.
• Fiscal /Tax incentives/Industry Status promised to Cable Sector in August 2010

recommendations acceptedp byy MIB should be finalized before next Budget
g due on
March 16.
• Training and capacity building is yet to start for phase 1.
• A massive multi‐media campaign to explain benefits of DAS needs to be launched

by Industry/Government and TRAI.
• Tariff and interconnection issues and logistics need to be in place for Phase 1 to
start on June 30.The realistic timeline for DAS is dependent on effective action on
allll above.
b
Thank You
Ashok Mans
Mansukhani
khani
PANAJI
February 18, 2012

Ashok M TDSAT

Uploaded by

Ashok M TDSAT

Uploaded by

Challenges of Regulation

Millions of Homes Served Great Service at Nominal Cost

• 140 million TV Households Over 700 TV Channels

Cable likely to grow to over 110 million homes by 2014

Terrestrial Direct ‐ To‐

DAS ( Digital Addressable

NON‐DAS ( Analogue Bouquets)

Broadcaster Aggregator MSO LCO Consumer

DTH/Satellite Service Value Chain

IPTV Service Value Chain

¾ A Fast track judicial body (Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal

¾ The Cable Rules 1994 were amended in 2006 empowering Government to

¾ TRAI also recommends policy initiatives to Government. A recent example is

• In August 2010, TRAI proposed sweeping reforms of the Cable Sector by

• TRAI also wanted to reform the cable registration process by introducing

• Government accepted the recommendations which led to vital

• A four phase notification was issued in November 2011.

All One Million Plus Cities

All Municipalities & Municipal

• Should there be separate tariff and Interconnection Regulation for Ad free

• It is historic to note that over 84 responses have been received from

• Digitalizing 140 million Cable TV customers by 2014 is a huge task.

• Progressive Digitalization with addressability of Pay channels can be first Step

• Good policy framework can accelerate the process.

• To ensure this, serious and speedy actions are required.

• Fiscal /Tax incentives/Industry Status promised to Cable Sector in August 2010

• Training and capacity building is yet to start for phase 1.

• A massive multi‐media campaign to explain benefits of DAS needs to be launched

You might also like

Ashok M TDSAT

Uploaded by

Ashok M TDSAT

Uploaded by

Challenges of Regulation

Millions of Homes Served Great Service at Nominal Cost

• 140 million TV Households Over 700 TV Channels

Cable likely to grow to over 110 million homes by 2014

Terrestrial Direct ‐ To‐

DAS ( Digital Addressable

NON‐DAS ( Analogue Bouquets)

Broadcaster Aggregator MSO LCO Consumer

DTH/Satellite Service Value Chain

IPTV Service Value Chain

¾ A Fast track judicial body (Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal

¾ The Cable Rules 1994 were amended in 2006 empowering Government to

¾ TRAI also recommends policy initiatives to Government. A recent example is

• In August 2010, TRAI proposed sweeping reforms of the Cable Sector by

• TRAI also wanted to reform the cable registration process by introducing

• Government accepted the recommendations which led to vital

• A four phase notification was issued in November 2011.

 All One Million Plus Cities

 All Municipalities & Municipal

• Should there be separate tariff and Interconnection Regulation for Ad free

• It is historic to note that over 84 responses have been received from

• Digitalizing 140 million Cable TV customers by 2014 is a huge task.

• Progressive Digitalization with addressability of Pay channels can be first Step

• Good policy framework can accelerate the process.

• To ensure this, serious and speedy actions are required.

• Fiscal /Tax incentives/Industry Status promised to Cable Sector in August 2010

• Training and capacity building is yet to start for phase 1.

• A massive multi‐media campaign to explain benefits of DAS needs to be launched

You might also like

All One Million Plus Cities

All Municipalities & Municipal