Term 1
Term 1
KNOWLEDGE
MANAGEMENT
INITIATIVES
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM September 2003/Vol. 46, No. 9
1/16
Importance of IT in Knowledge
Management
●
Reduces the complexity of Knowledge Management
●
Easier to acquire, store, update, distribute...
●
Integration , sharing of knowledge
●
Advancing
2/16
Two basic approaches to KM
Knowledge Management
Codification Personalization
explicit , structured tacit, unstructured
3/16
Role of IT...
Codification Personalization
explicit , structured tacit, unstructured
✔
Store
✔
Personal communication
✔
Retrieve
✔
Meeting etc.
✔
Update
✔
Access people
✔
Share
✔
Achieve knowledge
transfer
Eg. DBMS,Electronic Eg. Expert Directories,
Knowledge Repositories video conferencing tools
4/16
KM in the Organization
Industries
Product Based Service Based
Volatility
5/16
Example
Lowvolatility context Highvolatility context
●
HewlettPackard
●
British Petroleum
Product ●
Microsoft
●
Buckman Laboratories
based ●
Siemens Infineon
●
Shell
Technologies
●
Xerox
●
Ernst & Young ●
McKinsey
Service ●
KPMG ●
Skandia
based ●
Siemens Business
Services
6/16
ProductBased Organizations in
LowVolatility Context
Productbased organizations in a low volatility
context usually do not compete on the basis of
products alone. Instead, these organizations often
compete on other grounds (for example, services that
accompany products).
✔
Buckman Laboratories changed its strategy from
merely selling products to solving chemical
treatment problems for customers.
✔
BP and Shell recognized oil exploration as a
source of competitive advantage because drilling
is such an expensive undertaking.
7/16
What Type of KM needed...?.
●
Knowledge needed to sustain these diverse bases of
competition is often tacit.
●
The organizations have mainly adopted the
personalization approach to KM.
●
IT to support facetoface communication and
Communities of Practice (COP), which are informal
networks of people who share similar work roles and
common context.
8/16
Buckman Laboratories
●
A global ecommunication network (K’Netix) that links
specialists to field staff.
●
K’Netix has several forums to support COP devoted
to various business areas (TechForum has about 20
sections devoted to areas such as pulp and paper, and
industrial water treatment).
BP
●
Invested $434,000 to develop Connect, a knowledge yellow
pages that helps employees locate required expertise.
Shell
●
Has an Expertise Directory that acts as a clearing house and
signpost for both knowledge seekers and contributors.
●
Shell developed Global Networks, which comprised collaboration
tools like LiveLink and Microsoft Exchange for communication. 9/16
Low Volatility High Volatility
Context Context
Expert Directories
Expert Directories
• Expert Directory (Microsoft)
• Connect (British
• Knowledge Map (Siemens
Petroleum)
Infineon Technologies)
• Expertise Directory (Shell)
• Connex (HewlettPackard)
Product Direct Exchange
COP
Based • Phone and videoconferencing
• K'Netix (Buckman Lab.)
(Siemens Infineon Technologies)
• Global Networks (Shell)
• Peopletransfer (Hewlett
Packard)
Repositories
• Electronic Sales Partners
(HewlettPackard)
• Eureka (Xerox)
• Internal Technical Education
(Microsoft)
10/16
Low Volatility High Volatility
Context Context
Repositories Direct Exchange
• Center for Business • Phone and Videoconferencing
Service Knowledge (Ernst & (McKinsey)
Young) • People transfer (McKinsey and
Based
• KWorld (KPMG) Skandia)
• SAP R/3 (Siemens
Business Services)
11/16
Implications for Practice
Low Volatility High Volatility
Context Context
Provide expert directories
●
• Identify and promote
and collaborative tools for
strategic communities of
Product product development teams
practice
Based • Provide knowledge
• Provide expert
repositories for product
directories
sales teams
and collaborative tools
• Review of contents in
• Reward participation in
knowledge repositories by
strategic communities of
experts
practice
• Reward team for sharing
of knowledge
12/16
Implications for Practice Cont.
Low Volatility High Volatility
Context Context
• Create and maintain high • Build a culture of mutual
quality knowledge repositories support and interaction
Service
• Provide effective search
Based
capabilities for repositories • Provide communication
• Reward quality contributions support for onetoone
to knowledge repositories interaction via multiple
• Reward effective reuse of media
knowledge from repositories
13/16
Conclusion
High
Service based in Product based in
Low volatility High volatility
Codification
approach Product based in
Low volatility
Service based in
High volatility
Low
Low Personalization approach High
14/16
Authors
Atreyi Kankanhalli ([email protected]) is a fellow in the
Department of Information Systems at the National University of
Singapore.
Fransiska Tanudidjaja is an analyst at Accenture, Singapore.
Juliana Sutanto is a graduate student in the Department of
Information Systems at the National University of Singapore.
Bernard C.Y. Tan ([email protected]) is an associate professor
and head of the the Department of Information Systems at the
National University of Singapore.
15/16
Thanks
16/16