Topic: 9 principles of journalism

Collection, preparation, and

distribution of news and related
commentary and feature materials
through media such as pamphlets,
newsletters, newspapers,
magazines, radio, film, television,
and books. The term was originally
applied to the reportage of current
events in printed form, specifically
newspapers, but in the late 20th
century it came to include
electronic media as well. It is
sometimes used to refer to writing
characterized by a direct
presentation of facts or description
of events without an attempt at
interpretation. Colleges and
universities confer degrees in
journalism and sponsor research in
related fields such as media studies
and journalism ethics.
1. Journalism’s first obligation is to the truth
2. Its first loyalty is to citizens
3. Its essence is a discipline of verification
4. Its practitioners must maintain an independence from
those they cover
5. It must serve as an independent monitor of power
6. It must provide a forum for public criticism and
compromise
7. It must strive to make the significant interesting and
relevant
8. It must keep the news comprehensive and proportional
9. Its practitioners must be allowed to exercise their personal
conscience
▣ Democracy depends on citizens having reliable,
accurate facts put in a meaningful context.
Journalism does not pursue truth in an absolute
or philosophical sense, but it can–and must–
pursue it in a practical sense. This “journalistic
truth” is a process that begins with the
professional discipline of assembling and
verifying facts. Then journalists try to convey a
fair and reliable account of their meaning, valid
for now, subject to further investigation.
Journalists should be as transparent as possible
about sources and methods so audiences can
make their own assessment of the information.
Even in a world of expanding voices, accuracy is
the foundation upon which everything else is
built–context, interpretation, comment, criticism,
analysis and debate. The truth, over time, emerges
from this forum. As citizens encounter an ever
greater flow of data, they have more need–not
less–for identifiable sources dedicated to verifying
that information and putting it in context.
▣
While news organizations answer to many constituencies, including
advertisers and shareholders, the journalists in those organizations must
maintain allegiance to citizens and the larger public interest above any other if
they are to provide the news without fear or favor. This commitment to
citizens first is the basis of a news organization’s credibility, the implied
covenant that tells the audience the coverage is not slanted for friends or
advertisers. Commitment to citizens also means journalism should present a
representative picture of all constituent groups in society. Ignoring certain
citizens has the effect of disenfranchising them. The theory underlying the
modern news industry has been the belief that credibility builds a broad and
loyal audience, and that economic success follows in turn. In that regard, the
business people in a news organization also must nurture–not exploit–their
allegiance to the audience ahead of other considerations.
 Journalists rely on a professional discipline for verifying
information. When the concept of objectivity originally evolved, it
did not imply that journalists are free of bias. It called, rather, for a
consistent method of testing information–a transparent approach
to evidence–precisely so that personal and cultural biases would
not undermine the accuracy of their work. The method is
objective, not the journalist. Seeking out multiple witnesses,
disclosing as much as possible about sources, or asking various
sides for comment, all signal such standards. This discipline of
verification is what separates journalism from other modes of
communication, such as propaganda, fiction or entertainment. But
the need for professional method is not always fully recognized or
refined. While journalism has developed various techniques for
determining facts, for instance, it has done less to develop a
system for testing the reliability of journalistic interpretation.
Independence is an underlying requirement of journalism, a
cornerstone of its reliability. Independence of spirit and mind,
rather than neutrality, is the principle journalists must keep in
focus. While editorialists and commentators are not neutral, the
source of their credibility is still their accuracy, intellectual
fairness and ability to inform–not their devotion to a certain group
or outcome. In our independence, however, we must avoid any
tendency to stray into arrogance, elitism, isolation or nihilism.
 Journalism has an unusual capacity to serve as
watchdog over those whose power and position most
affect citizens. The Founders recognized this to be a
rampart against despotism when they ensured an
independent press; courts have affirmed it; citizens rely
on it. As journalists, we have an obligation to protect
this watchdog freedom by not demeaning it in
frivolous use or exploiting it for commercial gain.
The news media are the common carriers of public discussion, and
this responsibility forms a basis for our special privileges. This
discussion serves society best when it is informed by facts rather
than prejudice and supposition. It also should strive to fairly
represent the varied viewpoints and interests in society, and to
place them in context rather than highlight only the conflicting
fringes of debate. Accuracy and truthfulness require that as
framers of the public discussion we not neglect the points of
common ground where problem solving occurs.
Journalism is storytelling with a purpose. It should do more than
gather an audience or catalogue the important. For its own
survival, it must balance what readers know they want with what
they cannot anticipate but need. In short, it must strive to make
the significant interesting and relevant. The effectiveness of a
piece of journalism is measured both by how much a work
engages its audience and enlightens it. This means journalists
must continually ask what information has most value to citizens
and in what form. While journalism should reach beyond such
topics as government and public safety, a journalism
overwhelmed by trivia and false significance ultimately engenders
a trivial society.
Keeping news in proportion and not leaving important things out
are also cornerstones of truthfulness. Journalism is a form of
cartography: it creates a map for citizens to navigate society.
Inflating events for sensation, neglecting others, stereotyping or
being disproportionately negative all make a less reliable map.
The map also should include news of all our communities, not just
those with attractive demographics. This is best achieved by
newsrooms with a diversity of backgrounds and perspectives. The
map is only an analogy; proportion and comprehensiveness are
subjective, yet their elusiveness does not lessen their significance.
Every journalist must have a personal sense of ethics and
responsibility–a moral compass. Each of us must be willing, if
fairness and accuracy require, to voice differences with our
colleagues, whether in the newsroom or the executive suite. News
organizations do well to nurture this independence by
encouraging individuals to speak their minds. This stimulates the
intellectual diversity necessary to understand and accurately
cover an increasingly diverse society. It is this diversity of minds
and voices, not just numbers, that matters.
Thanks for Attention! ☺