there is growing academic interest in Islamic law and their countries.
1.The Notion of a “Religious Legal System” is
not given in nature, but is a product of reflection Characterization of a legal system as religious is always based on assessing whether it fulfils conditions we ourselves have stipulated. 2. Religiosity is a relative concept: whether a system is religious is a matter of degree, as opposed to an either-or determination
3. There are three parameters salient to the
determination that a legal system is a religious legal system: 3.1 The alleged source of the system 3.2 The areas covered by the system’s rules and 3.3 The system’s mode of operation 3.1 The alleged source/origins of the system
When a system claims to be of divine origin, it
can be regarded as a religious system Islamic law – prophet Muhammad Jewish law - is the legal system of the Jewish people as it has developed from Biblical times to the present. The Bible claims that Jewish law was initiated by God at Sinai amidst thunder and lightning, and it speaks of Moses and other prophets who added to that law by speaking to God, often in rather eerie circumstances. 2 Its source/origin is the first five books of what came to be the Bible (Pentateuch). Hindu law - It is believed that Hindu law is a divine law. It was revealed to the people by God through Vedas. Various sages and ascetics have elaborated and refined the abstract concepts of life explained in the Vedas. Its sources of law that it recognises are also divine or divine inspired. System Source of law Islamic i. Quran ii. Sunnah (traditions of Muhammad ibn Abdullah),which means the things he said, i.e. hadith, the way he lived his life, his conduct. Jewish law Written and Oral Law Written Law - Torah Oral Law – i. Mishna (self-contained rules and laws) ii. halakhic midrashim are compilations of laws that correspond directly to Written Laws from the Torah. Hindu law Ancient and modern sources i. Shruti means "what is heard" ii. Smrit means "what is remembered", etc iii. Legislation – modern source iv. Precedent – modern source 3.2 The Areas Covered by the System’s Rules In most cases, it purports to cover all aspects of life : namely 3 a) interpersonal relations - the system may attempt to ensure that goals set by individuals will not be achieved at the cost of harm to others – contemporary covered under criminal law b) Relationship between the individual and society - such regulation is reflected in tax law and laws governing military service and loyalty to the state c) Laws intended to prevent individuals from self- harm, such as laws against suicide, or laws against certain kinds of sexual relations between consenting adults, even in private. Such laws are sometimes referred to as paternalistic laws. A system that does not content itself with regulating the first two spheres, but spills over into the third, can be said to have a religious dimension. A system that refers to the individual’s internal mental and emotional world has a religious quality to it. E.g. “thou shalt not covet” QUESTION: WHAT IS THE JUSTIFICATION OF STATES LEGISLATING ON PATERNALISTIC ISSUES? 3.3 The System’s Mode of Operation The tools that legal systems employ to advance their agenda – namely, legislation, adjudication and interpretation a) Law is eternal and immutable – can’t be changed by human beings to suit human conveniences. Torah amendments - The Bible does, however, provide two ways to amend Biblical law. One is prophecy. God can and does continue to speak to human beings, and His words must be heeded. The other is judicial interpretation; in chapter 17 of Deuteronomy, God requires that each generation address its questions about the law to the judges of that generation, and whatever the judges decide is conclusive. Rabbis b) Access to sanctified texts is restricted to a limited circle (either officials or those with special attributes) E.g. Jewish laws (Torah) : Some laws are not made public (bShabat 153b); some passages of the Bible are not read publicly and others are not translated into the vernacular (bMegila 25a–b; bHagiga 13a); certain laws are vouchsafed only to the pious, others are not implemented (bShabat 12b; bBaba Kama 30b; bAvoda Zara 37b); the reasons for new legislation (gzeirot) are kept hidden from the public for one year, lest they be criticized (bAvoda Zara 35a). c) Officials are selected on the basis of lineage rather than acquired skills d) Judges are infallible- The notion that judges never err is rooted in the view that judges operate under divine providence, which protects them from any possible mistake e) Modes of punishment – often seen as harsh, eg. Stoning and lashing. Also, in Biblical law, some offenses fall under the jurisdiction of the heavenly court alone. For example, the punishment of divine extirpation (karet) is not administered by human courts, and offenses incurring this punishment are relegated to divine justice. f) Laws have both personal and territorial application - the law applies to every member of a given group, wherever they might be. g) Studying the law as a religious precept - Another consequence of the alleged divine origin of the law is the obligation imposed upon every individual, young or old, learned or not, to study the law on a regular basis. Torah keeps repeating variants of the precept “you shall speak of [the Torah …] when you lie down and when you rise up” (Deuteronomy 6:7; 11:19), or “you shall contemplate it day and night” (Joshua 1:8). In Western culture, knowledge of the law is the business of legal experts. Yet, secular legal systems, such as American law, while not upholding an obligation to study the law, do uphold the fiction that everyone is aware of the law and ignorance of the law is no excuse.