Pentru Lucrare Lorint
Pentru Lucrare Lorint
Pentru Lucrare Lorint
By
D53/CTY/PT/22079/2012
2014
DECLARATION
I declare that this research proposal is my original work and that it has not been
presented in any other university or institution for academic credit.
Signature………………………………….. Date……………………………
This research proposal has been submitted for examination with my approval as
University Supervisor.
Signature……………………………………. Date………………………………
Mrs. Mutuvi
Kenyatta University
This research proposal has been submitted for examination with my approval as
Kenyatta university Department Chairman
Signature……………………………………. Date………………………………
Muathe S. M (PhD)
Chairman
Business Administration
ii
DEDICATION
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I wish to thank the almighty for giving me wisdom to conduct this study. I also
appreciate my supervisor (Mrs. Mutuvi) for her guidance in conducting the research
and the management of Kenyatta University for their support.
iv
ABSTRACT
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DECLARATION........................................................................................................... ii
DEDICATION..............................................................................................................iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ........................................................................................... iv
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... v
OPERATIONAL DEFINITION OF OPERATIONAL TERMS ..........................viii
CHAPTER ONE ........................................................................................................... 1
INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background of the Study ...................................................................................... 1
1.1.1 Stress Management Strategies ....................................................................... 3
1.1.2 Employees‟ Commitment .............................................................................. 3
1.2 Problem Statement ................................................................................................ 5
1.3 Objective of the Study .......................................................................................... 6
1.3.1 Specific Objectives ........................................................................................ 7
1.4 Research Questions ............................................................................................... 7
1.5 Significance of the Study ...................................................................................... 7
CHAPTER TWO .......................................................................................................... 9
LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................ 9
2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 9
2.2 Theoretical Review ............................................................................................... 9
2.2.1 Transactional Model of Stress ....................................................................... 9
2.2.2 Systemic Stress: Selye's Theory .................................................................. 10
2.2.3 Psychological Stress: Lazarus Theory ......................................................... 11
2.2.4 Theoretical Framework ................................................................................ 12
2.3 Empirical Review................................................................................................ 13
2.3.1 Psychological support .................................................................................. 13
2.3.2 Job redesign ................................................................................................. 16
2.3.3 Training and development ........................................................................... 19
2.3.4 Employees‟ welfare programs ..................................................................... 22
2.4 Conceptual Framework ....................................................................................... 23
CHAPTER THREE .................................................................................................... 24
vi
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .............................................................................. 24
3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 24
3.2 Research Design.................................................................................................. 24
3.3 Population ........................................................................................................... 24
3.4 Sample size ......................................................................................................... 25
3.5 Sampling Technique ........................................................................................... 25
3.6 Data Collection ................................................................................................... 26
3.8 Data Collection Procedures................................................................................. 26
3.9 Data Analysis and Presentation .......................................................................... 27
3.10 Ethical Issues .................................................................................................... 28
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................ 29
vii
DEFINITION OF OPERATIONAL TERMS
viii
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1
Brynien (2006) posit that stress has a positive effect on employees of any organization
but up to a certain extent which an employee can cope with, in most cases if it
exceeds the bearable limits it results in negative results on employee‟s performance.
Lynn and Corbidge, (2004) highlights that stress globally costs business around 7
billion a year, this sum include sick-pays, missed deadlines and poor performance.
According to WHO (2005) in the 15 Member States of the pre-2004 EU, the cost of
stress at work and the related mental health problems were estimated to be on average
between 3% and 4% of gross national product, amounting to €265 billion annually.
Studies estimate that work-related stress alone costs the businesses and governments
of those countries about €20 billion in absenteeism and related health costs, in
addition to the price of lower productivity, higher staff turnover and reduced ability to
innovate. In the United Kingdom during 2000, one in five workers was „extremely‟ or
„very‟ stressed as a result of occupational influence. Stress-related disease is
responsible for the loss of 6.5 million working days each year in the United Kingdom,
costing employers around €571 million and society as a whole as much as €5,7
billion. The healthcare expenditure in the USA is nearly 50% greater for workers who
report high levels of stress at work (Kortum- Margot, 2002).
According to Vinassa (2003), work stress and other psychosocial factors are
recognized worldwide as a major challenge to workers‟ health and the health of
organizations. Work stress has been proved to adversely impact on individuals‟
psychological and physical health, as well as organizations‟ effectiveness. Workers
who are stressed are more likely to be unhealthy, poorly motivated, less productive
and less safe to work with at work. Organizations whose workers are stressed are also
less likely to be successful in a competitive market. The pressure of change, as well as
challenges such as financial constraints, increased workloads, the information and
technological revolution, changes in employees‟ demographics and employees‟ levels
of preparedness, changes in management styles and structures and the merging of
institutions, tended to become stressors and taking their toll on many employees
(Olivier, De Jager, Grootboom & Tokota 2005).
2
1.1.1 Stress Management Strategies
However, there are also some stress management strategies that are negative in
nature. According to Gulwadi (2006) negative stress management strategies can
include unhealthy behaviors, distractions, violence, and withdrawal. Unhealthy
behaviors such as smoking, drinking alcohol, excessively over/under eating, and drug
abuse are sometimes used to relieve stress. Distractions such as television, computer,
and filling up schedules to avoid facing problems are common ways to avoid stress.
3
different perspectives; affective, continuance and normative commitment. Employees
with affective commitment continue service with organization because they want to
do so. Kanter (2001) describe cohesion commitment as the attachment of an
individual‟s found of affectivity and emotion to the group; to the goal and values and
to the organization for its own sake. Meyer and Allen (1999) correlates affective
commitment with work experiences where employees experience psychologically
comfortable feelings (such as approachable managers), increasing their sense of
competence (such as feedback). Beck and Wilson (2000) indicates that the
development of affective commitment involves recognizing the organization‟s worth
and internalizing its principles and standards.
Meyer & Allen (1990) proposed that continuance commitment develops on the basis
of two factors: (1) number of investment (side – bets) individuals make in their
current organization and (2) perceived lack of alternatives. When employees enter
into the organization, they are bound to maintain a link with the organization or
committed to remain with the organization because lack of alternative opportunity or
awareness of the costs associated with leaving the organization. The cost associated
with leaving includes attractive benefits, the threat of wasting the time, effort spends
acquiring, disrupt personal relationship. On the other hand, normative commitment
develops on the basis of earlier experiences influenced by, for example family-based
experiences (parents that stress work loyalty) or cultural experiences (sanctions
against “job-hopping”) (Allen & Meyer, 1999). Normative commitment can increase
through beliefs that the employees have that employers provide more than they can
give.
4
commitment can aid higher productivity. Mowday, Porter, and Dubin (2004) suggest
that high committed employees may perform better than less committed once.
Bhatti and Samina (2011) said that stress has a high impact on high employees‟
commitment and productivity. They indicated that stress impacted directly on
employees‟ performance and job satisfaction and as a result lead to reduced
employees‟ commitment.
Kathie and Lingle (2007) emphasis that workers rank stress as a top reason why they
would leave their company. This therefore indicates that stress lead to lower
employees‟ commitment. Elovainio et al. (2002) highlights that occupational stress
inadvertently leads to low organizational commitment by the employees and therefore
results to increased labour turnover. Willingham (2008) notes that employees respond
to stress at work in a variety of ways; many employees show up for work, but do not
work to their full capacity; other employees decide that the stress is too much and quit
voluntarily. The American Psychological Association (2007) reports that “fifty-two
percent of employees report that they have considered or made a decision about their
career such as looking for a new job, declining a promotion or leaving a job based on
workplace stress” (p. 11). Some former employees start their own businesses and
remove themselves from the employees‟ workforce population altogether (Hewlett &
Buck Luce, 2006). This therefore indicates that stress may lead to reduced employees‟
commitment.
The ability to manage stress in the workplace can make the difference between
success and failure of an institution. According to Roger (2001), increased labour
turnover, an indication of low organisational commitment, robs the organisation
tenured and valuable workforce. Job stress is considered rising and has become
challenge for the employer and because high level stress results in low productivity,
increased absenteeism and leads to other employees problems like alcoholism, drug
abuse, hypertension and host of cardiovascular problems (Meneze 2005). Roger
further highlights that employees are the most important resource to an organisation
5
and therefore stress depletes organisations their valued resources. Lynn and Corbidge,
(2004) further highlights that stress costs business billions of dollars each year, this
results from loss of business, absenteeism, failure to meet deadlines, low employees‟
performance and low employees commitment.
Stress and its causes have been studied a lot; in fact, Agrawal (2001) indicated that
stress nowadays is not something new, not anything unknown. However, stress is still
causing havoc in work place, reducing employees‟ commitment and therefore
organizational performance. Kathie and Lingle (2007) notes that only 50% of
employers offer stress management programs to employees primarily because they
are perceived to have low impact on employee attraction and retention. In Kenya,
companies employ a number of stress management strategies which include, paying
their employees on time, role modeling, good communication channels, welfare
programs, training and development among others. However, despite all these efforts,
there are still reported stress related issues at this difficult economic times for
example, absenteeism, high labour turnover, frequent illnesses, conflicts, unexplained
looses, sluggishness among others posing challenges in service delivery. This
highlights ineffectiveness of the stress management strategies to curb labour turnover
and therefore enhance employees‟ commitment. It is against this background that this
study seeks to establish the effects of stress management on employees‟ commitment
in Family Bank.
Previous researchers have focused on the effects of the various stress management
strategies on employees‟ performance globally (Van der Stede, 2000; Zietlow, 2001;
Kleiman, 2003 and Robbins, 2005). To the best of the researcher‟s knowledge, none
of these local and international studies have been done to establish the effect of stress
management strategies on employees‟ commitment in Family Bank.
6
1.3.1 Specific Objectives
The results of this study would be important to the Human Resource personnel in
companies in making strategic decisions relating to formulation of stress management
strategies that will ensure enhanced employees‟ commitment for better performance.
The management at Family Bank will also use results from the study to review
policies to incorporate stress management measures and therefore improve on
employees retention and therefore avoid loosing employees with potential who the
bank have trained to other organizations.
7
This study will also be of importance to academicians and scholars as it provides
useful material for reference and future research since stress management is a
continuous phenomenon that still requires more studies. Further, this study will also
be significant in that, academically it would add to the existing knowledge on stress
management and its effect on employees‟ performance and thus forming part of
academic reference.
8
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
This section covers areas related to literature review on effect of stress management
strategies on employees‟ commitment. This chapter will be divided into; theoretical
review, empirical review and conceptual framework. Under empirical review, the
researcher will review literature on psychological support, job redesign; training and
development and employees‟ welfare programs.
This part of the research study focuses on reviewing and discussing the relevant and
appropriate theories on occupational stress that were used in the research study.
Theoretical orientation involved the analysis of theories relevant to the research
problem in order to provide a logical explanation with testable models that explain
relationship between a set of phenomena capable of predicting future occurrences or
observations of the same kind and capable of being tested through experiment or
otherwise falsified through empirical observation.
There is a significant amount of research into stress (e.g. Avey et al., 2009; Shimazu
et al., 2005). The transactional model of stress and coping addresses the stress process
as an ongoing relationship between the individual and the environment, where
individual perceptions and interpretations of the immediate environments play a
central role in creating psychological stress (Edwards, 1992; Lazarus and Folkman,
1984). Stress occurs when the perceived demands in the work environment (stressors)
exceed the person‟s perceived resources over time (Lazarus, 1990). According to
transactional theory, the consequences of work stressors will differ between
individuals, as they are mediated by two subjective elements: appraisals and coping.
First, the work environments are interpreted and evaluated by the individual, based on
own values and beliefs. This is called primary appraisal, and the results of the
9
appraisal will differ between individuals, as some will interpret the work
environments as more demanding and negative than others. Second, individuals will
search for and evaluate personal resources and strengths to cope with the stressful
environments; this is called the secondary appraisal. Subsequently, based on these
appraisals, the individual will choose a strategy for coping. A central assumption in
transactional theory is that the process is recursive, such that the coping activities and
the resulting psychological stress will feed back to the appraisal processes, and
change the perceptions of both the environments and the individual resources.
Consequently, time is an important factor in the theory, as perceptions and
evaluations of the work environment – and thereby stress - may change as a result of
coping efforts over time (Edwards, 1992; Lazarus, 1990).
The model proposes that stress can be reduced by helping stressed people change their
perceptions of stressors, providing them with strategies to help them cope and
improve their confidence in their inability to do so. To achieve this, organisation may
use psychological support, training and development, job redesigning and employee
welfare to ease the negative effect of stress on employee commitment to their jobs
and therefore improve the organisational performance. While psychological support
will assist the employees‟ change perception of stressors in the work place; training
will assist them to acquire skills to perform their jobs easily and therefore avoid
stress. The transactional model of how stress occurs may be applied to explore how
stress can be managed and reduced since it helps understand how people differently
perceive stress and how they appraise and cope with it. With this knowledge, a
management program can be developed taking into account different approaches to
manage stress in a work place.
The popularity of the stress concept stems largely from the work of the
endocrinologist Hans Selye. In a series of animal studies he observed that a variety of
stimulus events (e.g., heat, cold, toxic agents) applied intensely and long enough are
capable of producing common effects, meaning not specific to either stimulus event.
(Besides these nonspecific changes in the body, each stimulus produces, of course, its
10
specific effect, heat, for example, produces vasodilatation, and cold vasoconstriction.)
According to Selye, these nonspecifically caused changes constitute the stereotypical,
i.e., specific, response pattern of systemic stress. Selye (1976, p. 64) defines this
stress as `a state manifested by a syndrome which consists of all the nonspecifically
induced changes in a biologic system.'
This stereotypical response pattern, called the `General Adaptation Syndrome' (GAS),
proceeds in three stages. (a) The alarm reaction comprises an initial shock phase and a
subsequent counter shock phase. The shock phase exhibits autonomic excitability, an
increased adrenaline discharge, and gastro-intestinal ulcerations. The counter shock
phase marks the initial operation of defensive processes and is characterized by
increased adrenocortical activity. (b) If noxious stimulation continues, the organism
enters the stage of resistance. In this stage, the symptoms of the alarm reaction
disappear, which seemingly indicates the organism's adaptation to the stressor.
However, while resistance to the noxious stimulation increases, resistance to other
kinds of stressors decreases at the same time. (c) If the aversive stimulation persists,
resistance gives way to the stage of exhaustion. The organism's capability of adapting
to the stressor is exhausted, the symptoms of stage (a) reappear, but resistance is no
longer possible. Irreversible tissue damages appear, and, if the stimulation persists,
the organism dies.
Although Selye, fails to take into account coping mechanisms as important mediators
of the stress–outcome relationship, his theory serves to explain the detriments of
stress of interventions are not made in time to rescue the stressed individuals. This
theory indirectly underpins the importance of stress management strategies to avoid
employees reaching the irreversible stage when the stress is more advanced. With
adequate intervention measures that are applied in time, employees‟ commitment may
be restored and therefore their productivity.
Two concepts are central to any psychological stress theory: appraisal, i.e.,
individuals' evaluation of the significance of what is happening for their well-being,
11
and coping, i.e., individuals' efforts in thought and action to manage specific demands
(Lazarus 1993). In this theory, stress is regarded as a relational concept, i.e., stress is
not defined as a specific kind of external stimulation or a specific pattern of
physiological, behavioral, or subjective reactions. Instead, stress is viewed as a
relationship (`transaction') between individuals and their environment. Psychological
stress refers to a relationship with the environment that the person appraises as
significant for his or her well being and in which the demands tax or exceed available
coping resources' (Lazarus & Folkman 1986, p. 63). This definition points to two
processes as central mediators within the person–environment transaction: cognitive
appraisal and coping.
In this theory, work place stress is viewed as conflict between an individual and his
perception of an acceptable workplace environment. If the workplace environment is
not considered acceptable by the employees, there is a possibility of reduction in their
commitments to the organizational goals and hence a reduction in productivity. The
managers may consider redesigning of the work to ensure it meets employees‟
expectations of a conducive work environment.
Psychological Stress
Theories Dependent Variable
12
2.3 Empirical Review
Cognitive behavioral interventions are designed to educate employees about the role
of their thoughts and emotions in managing stressful events and to provide them with
the skills to modify their thoughts to facilitate adaptive coping (Bond & Bunce, 2000).
These interventions are intended to change individuals‟ appraisal of stressful
situations and their responses to them. For example, employees are taught to become
aware of negative thoughts or irrational beliefs and to substitute positive or rational
ideas (Bellarosa & Chen, 1997).
Further, other interventions in psychological strategies are time management and goal
setting. Time management and goal-setting interventions are designed to help people
manage their time better, both on and off the job. Employees often operate under time
pressure and are required to work on multiple tasks simultaneously. Working under
such conditions can be particularly stressful. Time management interventions provide
skills training in the areas of goal setting, scheduling and prioritizing tasks, self-
monitoring, problem solving, delegating, negotiating, and conflict resolution (Bruning
& Frew, 2007).
13
There is evidence that traditional, individual interventions such as counseling and
psychotherapy applied in work-related contexts reduce levels of psychological
distress and might improve job perception (Klink et al., 2001). Unfortunately, there is
little reference literature available that has evaluated how these different
psychological interventions enhance particular coping with work stress using
standardized checklists (Coyne & Racioppo, 2000). However, Bond and Bunce
(2001) used two kinds of worksite stress management interventions to enhance the
ability of media workers to cope with their work-related stress. As the authors wrote
„„one was an emotion-focused SMI that increased the individual ability to cope with
work-related strain, and another was a problem-focused intervention that trained
workers to identify and alleviate the workplace stressors that give rise to strain‟‟ (p.
156). Improvement in mental health and work-related variables was observed
following both interventions. In the first condition changes in the outcome variables
were mediated by the acceptance of undesirable thoughts and feelings, in the second
condition, outcome change was mediated by attempts to modify stressors.
According to Alford, Malouff and Osland (2005) journaling interventions are also
another psychological strategy of managing stress. Journaling interventions require
the employee to keep a journal, log, or diary of the stressful events in his or her life.
The journal is used as a means of assisting the employee to monitor stress levels, to
identify the recurring causes of stress, and to note his or her reactions. Journals are
also used to formulate action plans for managing stress (Bruning & Frew, 2007).
Further, exercise programs to provide progressive muscle relaxation are also used as a
psychological intervention in stress management. It generally focus on providing a
physical release from the tension that builds up in stressful situations, increasing
endorphin production, or both, although some have the goal of focusing the
employee‟s attention on physical activity (rather than on the stressors) or providing an
outlet for anger or hostility (Bruning & Frew, 2007). The underlying rationale is that,
since relaxation and muscle tension are incompatible, reducing muscle tension is
coupled with the reduction of autonomic activity, and consequently anxiety and stress
levels. Muscle relaxation is usually realised by alternating tensing and relaxing
exercises. Systematically moving thorough the major muscle groups of the body
14
enables a person to become skilled at recognizing tension in a muscle group and
relieving that tension.
15
as one 20-minute session (Rausch et al., 2006). Moreover, there is growing evidence
that the use of meditation reduces stress. In a study done by Kabat-Zinn et al. (1992),
after four weeks of practicing meditation, all participants reported the intervention to
have significantly reduced their stress and anxiety.
Within the literature on stress, job demand is a stressor that has been shown to
persistently affect psychological stress across theoretical perspectives (Häusser et al .,
2010). Workplace stress has for a long time been considered as a major work
environment problem in organizations (Cox et al., 2000). Job demand is
conceptualized mostly as perceived work overload, which causes stress, e.g., through
constant time pressure and deadlines (Cooper et al., 2001). Job design is the deliberate
purposeful planning of the job, including all its structural and social aspects and their
effect on the employee. Job design is a broad concept that can refer to any part or
combination of parts of the job.
According to Thomson (2006) employees in the following ratios reported that their
job is source of large amount of stress they experienced, 33%, and 77% articulated
that they remain always or sometimes in stress during last 12 months, 23% reported
16
that rarely experienced stress during their job. Many workers express that their job is
prominent source of stress in their life but reduced workload, improve management
and supervision, better pay, benefits, and vacation times can reduce the stress among
employees. There is substantial empirical support that stress is reduced when job
control and social support increases (Bakker et al. 2004). Job control is considered as
a resource in the transactional model of stress, where individual coping efforts include
attempts to increase job control or to better utilize the actual possibilities of control.
Therefore, Wales (2003) reports that there is a dire need to redesign job to offer
employees more autonomy and therefore enhance their commitment in their jobs.
Newman and Beehr (2003) divide interventions aimed at changing role characteristics
in redefining roles, reducing role overload, increasing participation in decision
making and reducing role conflict. This to a large extent involves job redesign to
enhance more of employees‟ participation and therefore enhance their commitment.
Task characteristics can be changed by designing jobs in the light of workers‟ abilities
and preferences, using workers‟ preferences in selection and placement, providing
training programmes so workers can enhance their skills and individualizing the
treatment of workers. Interventions aimed at changing both role and task
characteristics can be achieved by job (re)design.
A job may be motivating to one person but not to someone else, and depending on
how jobs are designed, they may provide more or less opportunity for employees to
17
satisfy their job-related needs. Herzberg (1998) believed that businesses should
motivate employees by adopting a democratic approach to management and by
improving the nature and content of the actual job through certain methods. Failure to
restructure job may be in a way to enrich it may lead to employees stress and
therefore reduce their commitment and productivity. Employee being given a greater
variety of tasks to perform (not necessarily more challenging) which should make the
work more interesting motivate him or her, this expresses how a job should be
designed so that the employees performs work with enthusiasm and avoid stressful
situations. The management should ensure job enrichment, which involves employee
being given a wider range of more interesting and challenging tasks surrounding a
complete unit of work to give a greater sense of achievement. Employees should be
motivated by empowering them by means of delegating more power to employees to
make their own decisions over areas of their working life. Importantly Herzberg
(1998) viewed pay as a hygiene factor, which is in direct contrast to Taylor who
viewed pay and piece-rate in particular.
Job enrichment through redesigning aims to motivate the interest and challenges of
work by providing the employee with a job that has these characteristics (Armstrong
2006). Job enrichment provides the employee with variety, decision-making,
responsibility and control in carrying out the work. The worker can identify a series of
tasks or activities that will determine the end product. Job enrichment provides a
feedback about the work and how the employee does the actual work. It is a vertical
expansion of the job. This is the opposite of job enlargement which is the horizontal
expansion of a job and which does not give greater authority, but just more duties.
Job enrichment could be through job re-design with intention to reverse the effects of
tasks that are repetitive requiring little autonomy. Some of these effects are boredom,
lack of flexibility, and employees‟ dissatisfaction The basis for job enrichment
practices is the work done by Frederick Hertzberg in the 1950's and 60's, which was
further refined in 1975 by Hackman and Oldham using what they called the Job
Characteristics Model. This model assumes that if five core job characteristics are
present, three psychological states critical to motivation are produced, resulting in
positive outcomes (Robbins, 2005).
18
2.3.3 Training and development
Many organization in the world, NASA, GE, Nokia, Stanford University, and the U.S.
Army to name just but a few are organizations that have provided Clarity Seminars‟
corporate stress management training to their employees. This training is aimed at
giving the managers and employees the skills they need to perform effectively under
high pressure. This training is at the cutting edge of stress reduction, offering a
powerful blend of cognitive training and clinically-proven relaxation techniques to
manage stress and enhance resiliency in the most challenging circumstances.
Workplace stress has for a long time been considered as a major work environment
problem in organizations (Cox et al., 2000). Many scholars point to the fact that
modern work-life, with frequent organizational restructurings, technological changes,
and stronger competition, places increasing challenges on employees that may cause
stress (Avey et al., 2009). Furthermore, the development of new values in
management, such as empowerment and self-management, is a sign of increased
decentralization and more freedom, but also more responsibilities on employees for
the work environment as well as for managing their career life (Frayse & Geringer,
2000; Frese & Fay, 2001; Raabe et al., 2007; Hall, 2004). Thus, stressful work
environments together with increased demands for self-management on employees
may promote a stronger need for individual self- management and coping tools.
Workplace training is a method for learning and development that may respond to
these needs. The purpose of workplace training is to help individuals to set job-
related goals, identify and implement adequate behavioural strategies to accomplish
these goals, and provide feedback and evaluation of the progress towards the goals
(Grant, 2006). This may include the development of skills to respond adequately to
stressful work environments, and to reduce work- related stress.
There is some empirical evidence of how workplace training may affect work-related
stress. For example, in a study of 15 managers who received training for one year,
participants reported that the training had increased their stress management abilities,
improved work-life balance, and reduced psychological stress (Wales, 2003).
However, other findings are mixed. Gyllensten and Palmer (2005) found that there
19
were no significant differences in stress level between the training group and the
control group after training, although the participants who received training reported
lower levels of stress in a qualitative follow-up study. A similar finding was reported
by Grant and colleagues (2009) in a study of executive training, where one group had
lower levels of stress after training while another had not. Self-reported effects are,
however, reported in quite a number of studies (e.g. Wales, 2003). One explanation
for the inconsistent findings regarding stress may be that there are individual
differences in learning experiences from training, and this is the assumption
underlying the present study. However, it agreeable those individuals with strong
learning experiences from the training process benefit more from stress reduction.
Within the literature on stress , job demand is a stressor that has been shown to
persistently affect psychological stress across theoretical perspectives (Häusser et al .,
2010). Job demand is conceptualized mostly as perceived work overload, which
causes stress, e.g., through constant time pressure and deadlines (Cooper et al., 2001).
The learning outcomes from training may affect the subjective appraisal of job
demand, and there is some empirical evidence that supports a similar relationship. For
example, it has been found that executive training enhanced performance psychology
variables, such as self-efficacy and self-determination and eventually improves
employees‟ commitment (Moen & Skaalvik, 2009). Similar reported outcomes of
cognitive processes are increased self-confidence (Leedham, 2005) and assertiveness.
Furthermore, Wales (2003) reported that managers felt able to accomplish things after
coaching that they could not do before, both as a result of increased self-confidence,
acquisition of new skills and reduction of stressors in their jobs.
20
a task with ease. Appropriate training can increase staff involvement in the
organization, improve communication between peers, and improve individual‟s
ability to perform their tasks (Hammill, 2005).
According to Wood (2001), training and personnel development has long been seen as
a way not only to ensure highly skilled employees but also to increase self-esteem,
commitment and motivation and helps to curtail levels of stress among the employees.
Training should be focused on helping the employees perform their tasks with ease
and therefore avoid eventualities of stress in the work place. Wood (2001) notes that
when employees are faced with hard tasks, their morale is killed and their
performance is lowered as in most cases it results to stress.
Dant (2004) stresses that, as one learn to manage one‟s job stress and improve one‟s
work relationships, one will have more control over ones ability to think clearly and
act appropriately. One will be able to break habits that add to one stress at work – and
one will even be able to change negative ways of thinking about things that only add
to one‟s stress. Many of us make job stress worse with patterns of thought or behavior
that keep people from relieving pressure on other people (Van der Stede, 2000). If one
can turn around these self-defeating habits, one will find employer-imposed stress
easier to handle. Career growth is a continuous process and is associated with
different measures that would help in ensuring career development of the employees.
Employees should constantly check their aims and activities and are in need of self-
examination and self-motivation in order to attain job satisfaction. The organization,
on the other hand, plays a vital role in helping their employees with their goals and
21
activities. Career development of the workforce can be beneficial for the organization
and allow them to adapt fluidly on the demands of the industry (Holmlund-Rytkönen
& Strandvik, 2005).
Employees‟ welfare programs can be traced to the beginning of the 20th century.
Reformers, labor unions, journalists and others brought to national attention to poor
working conditions for workers in factories and other industries (Kleiman, 2003).
Since then, employees‟ welfare programs have continued to evolve, providing more
benefits for American workers. The programmes are meant to improve the well-being
and health of an organization (Schabracq et al., 2001). The programmes are designed
to assist employees and their dependents in dealing with personal problems that
diminish job functioning, pose a threat to their health, well being, and/or possibly
their jobs. Typically, the employer pays for the programme and there is no cost to the
employee.
22
organization. Six parameters that can be used to evaluate work life balance programs
are: extent of management buy-in and training, how programs are communicated to
employees, corporate culture, management controls, human resources policies and
employees control (Mitchell, 2008).
Psychological Support
Counseling
Meditation
Physical exercises
Relaxation
Social support
Time management and goal setting
Job Redesign
Job rotations
Job enrichment
Job clarity
Employee Commitment
Training and Development Loyalty
Training Affection
Seminars Belongingness
Promotions
Exchange programs
23
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
Kombo and Tromp (2006) define research design as the scheme outline or plan that is
used to generate answers to research to research problems. This study will employ
descriptive research design. A descriptive study attempts to describe or define a
subject, often by creating a profile of a group of problems, people, or events, through
the collection of data and tabulation of the frequencies on research variables or their
interaction as indicated by Cooper and Schindler (2003). Kombo and Tromp (2006)
notes that the choice of descriptive survey research design is made in a study when
the research is interested on the state of affairs already existing in the field and no
variable would be manipulated. It is focused on determining the effect of stress
management strategies on employees‟ commitment.
3.3 Population
24
management. The target population therefore will be the 347 employees working in
the 3 levels of management.
From the 347 employees working in the 3 levels of management in the bank, the
study will take a sample of 20%. Kotler et al. (2001) argues that if well chosen,
samples of 10% of a population can often give good reliability and therefore the
choice of 20% in this study will be adequate. This generated a sample of 69
respondents for this study. The sample was drawn from the population as shown on
the table 3.2 below.
This study will use stratified random sampling to get a study sample. According to
Deming (1990) stratified random sampling technique produce estimates of overall
population parameters with greater precision and ensures a more representative
sample is derived from a population. Stratification aims to reduce standard error by
25
providing some control over variance. The sample size for the study will be drawn
from the 3 levels of management in Family bank branches in Nairobi County.
This study will collect primary data for analysis. Primary data will be collected using
self-administered questionnaires. To collect primary data a semi-structured
questionnaire with both close ended and open-ended questions will be used. Kombo
and Tromp (2006) indicate that semi-structured questionnaire refers to the use of
already prepared questions during the study. The open-ended questions provide
additional information that may not have been captured in the close-ended questions.
A questionnaire is preferred in this study because respondents of the study are literate
and quite able to answer questions asked adequately. Also, information required can
easily be described in writing as indicated by (Oso, 2009). The questionnaire will be
developed in accordance with the research objectives. Questions to address each
research question will be included. In order to ensure uniformity in response and to
encourage participation, the questionnaire will be kept short and structured with
mostly multiple-choice selections in a Likert scale. According to Mugenda and
Mugenda (2003), questionnaires are commonly used to obtain important information
about a population under study.
The researcher will personally administer the questionnaires to the respondents. The
researcher will however inform the respondents that the instruments being
administered will be for academic research purpose only and the responses from the
respondents will be kept secret and confidential. Further, the researcher will inform
the respondents that they were free to withdraw from the study at any point when they
felt like so. The researcher will have the questionnaires filled in and then collected
later through drop and pick later method.
Before the actual data collection, the researcher will conduct a pilot study do
determine the reliability of research instruments. Reliability refers to the consistency
of measurement and is frequently assessed using the test–retest reliability method.
26
Including many similar items on a measure, by testing a diverse sample of individuals
and by using uniform testing procedures increases reliability. Reliability gives the
internal consistency of data collected. This ensures that the data has certain internal
consistent pattern. Reliability of the research instrument will be enhanced through a
pilot study that was done in Equity bank selecting a pilot group of 10 respondents.
The data collection instrument will be administered to conveniently selected
respondents. The logic behind using another bank other than Family Bank is in order
not to pre-empty what the study was all about to potential respondents and also not to
bother the respondent with the pilot study and actual study. According to Cooper and
Schindler (2003), the pilot group can range from 25 to 100 subjects but it does not
need to be statistically selected. The respondents were conveniently selected since
statistical conditions are not necessary in the pilot study (Cooper and Schindler,
2003). The pilot data will not be included in the actual study. This reliability estimate
was measured using Cronbach Alpha coefficient (α). Nunnally (1978) recommends
that instruments used in research should have reliability of about 0.70 and above.
To improve on the validity of the instrument the study will seek opinions of experts in
the field of study especially the researcher‟s supervisor and lecturers. Mugenda and
Mugenda (2003) contend that the usual procedure in assessing the content validity of
a measure is to use a professional or expert in a particular field. This will facilitate the
necessary revision and modification of the research instruments thereby enhancing
validity. According to Bridget and Lewin (2005), validity is the degree by which the
sample of test items represents the content the test is designed to measure. Validation
of the research instrument is important to this study as it will ensured that the study
collects relevant information to answer the research questions.
The researcher will edit completed questionnaires for completeness and consistency.
Data clean-up will follow; this process will involve editing, coding, and tabulation in
order to detect any anomalies in the responses and assign specific numerical values to
the responses for further analysis. The data will then be analyzed using descriptive
statistics. The descriptive statistical tools (SPSS version 20 and Excel) will help the
27
researcher to describe the data. The Likert scale will be used to analyze the mean
score and standard deviation. The findings will be presented using tables and graphs
for further analysis and to facilitate comparison, while explanation to the table and
graphs will be given in prose. This will generate quantitative reports through
tabulations, percentages, and measure of central tendency.
The researcher will further employ a multivariate regression model to study the
relationship between stress management strategies and employees‟ commitment. The
research deems regression method to be useful for its ability to test the nature of
influence of independent variables on a dependent variable. Regression is able to
estimate the coefficients of the linear equation, involving one or more independent
variables, which best predicted the value of the dependent variable. The researcher
use linear regression analysis to analyze the data. The regression model will be as
follows:
The researcher holds a moral obligation to treat the information collected in the study
with utmost confidentiality. The researcher therefore assured the respondents that the
information they provided would be treated with confidentiality. Further, the
researcher will assure the respondents of anonymity in their responses and that the
information collected will only be used for academic purposes only.
28
REFERENCES
Cox, T., Griffiths, A., & Rial-González, E. (2000). Research on Work-related Stress.
Luxembourg: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.
Erkutlu J. and Chafra, P. (2006), Industrial and Organizational Behavior (5th ed.).
Wiley: Hoboken, NJ.
Griffith, J., Steptoe, A., & Cropley, M. (2002). An investigation of coping strategies
associated with job stress in teachers. British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 69, 517-531.
Hewlett, S., & Buck Luce, C. (2006). Opting out or opting in. Global Agenda, 2-4.
Jaros, S.T., Jermier, J. M., Koehler, J.W., & Sincich, T. (2003). Effects of
continuance, affective a moral commitment on the withdrawal process: an
29
evaluation of eight structural equation models, Academy of Management
Journal, 36,951-995.
Kathie H. and Lingle T. (2007), Health Realization/Innate Health: Can a quiet mind
and a positive feeling state is accessible over the lifespan without stress-relief
techniques? Med. Sci. Monitor 11(12) HY47-52
Meneze, H. (2005), The Effect of Supportive Management and Job Quality on The
Turnover Intentions and Health of Military Personnel. Human Resource
Management 46 (2), 185-201.
Meyer & Allen (1999). Commitment in the workplace, Theory, research and
application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Dubin, R. (2004). Unit performance, situational
factors, and employee attitudes in spatially separated work units.
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 231-248.
Olivier, M.A.J., De Jager, M.J., Grootboom, P., & Tokota, K. B. 2005. Work
Wellness: A prerequisite for effective education in higher education
institutions. South African Journal of Higher Education. 19(5): 912-930.
Paul. G., Elam, & Verhulst, (2007). A longitudinal study of employee‟s perceptions
of using deep breathing. meditation to reduce testing stresses. Teaching and
Learning in Medicine , 19(3), 278-292.
30
Pflanz, S. E., & Ogle, A. D. (2006). Job Stress, Depression, Work Performance and
Perceptions of Supervisors in Military Personnel. Military Medicine, 171(9),
861-865.
Rees M. (2001). Principles and Practice of Stress Management, Third Edition, 46-47
Rees M. & Redfern C., (2003), The Leadership Challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-
Bass.
WHO European Ministerial Conference on Medical Health, (2005). Mental health and
working life. Helsinki, Finland: EUR/04/5047810/66. 12-15 January 2005
31
APPENDICES
P O Box
Nairobi.
Dear Respondent,
My name is Joseph Gitau Karanja and I am currently studying for Master of Business
Administration Degree of Kenyatta University. As part of my course work, I need to
conduct a research based on my area of study. I will therefore study Effect of Stress
Management Strategies on Employees’ Commitment; taking a case of Family
Bank Branches in Nairobi County.
You have been identified as one of the people that could be of assistance with the
research and I thus request your participation in the research. Essentially, you would
be required to complete a questionnaire. You will be treated anonymously and your
responses will be treated with utmost confidentiality. The information you provide
will be used only for academic purposes.
32
Appendix II: Questionnaire
This questionnaire consists of two parts; kindly answer all the questions by ticking in
the appropriate box or filling in the spaces provided.
18 - 24 Years [ ] 25 - 30 Years [ ]
31 - 34 years [ ] 35 - 40 years [ ]
41 - 44 years [ ] 45 - 50 years [ ]
Primary [ ] Secondary [ ]
Others-
specify…………………………………………………………………………
33
Section B: Stress Management Strategies on Employees’ Commitment
Psychological Support
Not at all [ ]
7. In your own opinion, to what extent are the following forms psychological
supports effective in managing stress among employees? Use a scale of 1 to 5;
where 1 = not at all, 2 = low extent, 3 = moderate extent, 4 = great extent and
5 = very great extent.
1 2 3 4 5
Meditation interventions
Relaxation interventions
Deep-breathing interventions
Time management interventions
Goal-setting interventions
Counseling and psychotherapy
Journaling interventions
Social support
Job Redesign
34
Very great extent [ ] Great extent [ ]
Not at all [ ]
9. To what extents are the following aspects of job redesign effective in ensuring
employees‟ commitment in Family Bank? Use a scale of 1 to 5; where 1 = not
at all, 2 = low extent, 3 = moderate extent, 4 = great extent and 5 = very great
extent.
1 2 3 4 5
Redefining Job roles
Reducing role overload
Increasing participation in decision making
Job enrichment to enhance job control
Reducing role conflict
10. On a scale of 1 to 5 kindly indicate your level of agreement with the following
statement regarding job redesign. Where 1 = strongly disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 =
Neutral; 4 = agree; and 5 = strongly agree.
1 2 3 4 5
Job should be designed so that the employees
performs work with enthusiasm and avoid stressful
situations
Job should be enrichment to involve a wider range of
more interesting and challenging tasks surrounding a
complete unit of work to give a greater sense of
achievement for the employees
Job enrichment provides the employee with variety,
decision-making, responsibility and control in
carrying out the work
35
Training and Development
11. How often does the bank conduct training and development exercises?
Weekly [ ] Monthly [ ]
Quarterly [ ] Semi annually [ ]
Annually [ ] Bi annually [ ]
Others (Specify)
Not at all [ ]
14. Kindly indicate your level of agreement with the following statement regarding
training and development and stress management. Use a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 =
strongly disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Neutral; 4 = agree; and 5 = strongly agree.
1 2 3 4 5
Training gives the managers and employees the skills
they need to perform effectively under high job
pressure
Training is a method for learning and development
that may help employees to manage stress and thus
improve employees‟ commitment
Training help individuals set job- related goals,
identify and implement adequate behavioural
strategies to accomplish the goals, and provide
feedback and evaluation of the progress towards the
goals
Training and development offers employees skills to
respond adequately to stressful work environments
Training increases employees stress management
36
abilities, improves work-life balance, and reduces
psychological stress
Appropriate training increases staff involvement in
the organization, improve communication between
peers, and improve individuals ability to perform
their tasks
Training and personnel development increases
employees‟ self-esteem, commitment and motivation
and helps to curtail levels of stress among the
employees
Not at all [ ]
17. Kindly indicate your level of agreement with the following statement regarding
employees‟ welfare programs and stress management to enhance employees‟
commitment. Use a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = strongly disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 =
Neutral; 4 = agree; and 5 = strongly agree.
1 2 3 4 5
Employees‟ welfare programs provide better physical
and mental health to workers for a healthy work
environment and thus enhances employees‟
commitments
Facilities like housing schemes, medical benefits, and
education and recreation facilities for workers‟
families help in raising their standards of living;
making workers to pay more attention towards work
and thus increase their commitments.
Employees‟ welfare programs enhances a feeling of
involvement and participation among workers and
therefore they take active interest in their jobs and
37
work
Employee welfare measures increase the productivity
of organization and promote healthy industrial
relations thereby maintaining industrial peace.
18. In your own opinion, to what extent are the following strategies effective in
ensuring employees‟ commitment in Family Bank? Use a scale of 1 to 5;
where 1 = very in effective, 2 = ineffective, 3 = moderately effective, 4 =
Effective, and 5 = very Effective.
1 2 3 4 5
Psychological support
Job redesign
Training and development
Employee welfare programs
38
Appendix III: Budget
39
Appendix IV: Work Plan
Weeks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Research proposal
development and
writing
Proposal presentation
and defense
Proposal Corrections
Questionnaire testing
Data collection
Data analysis
Report writing
Presentation of Report
Corrections
Compilation and
submission of final
Report
40