Chapter 2
Chapter 2
Chapter 2
What’s more, two accelerating business trends are making it even harder to synchronize
supply chains.
First, global sourcing is forcing supply chains to stretch farther across borders. The
goods people consume are increasingly made in some other part of the world,
particularly in Asia. This acceleration in global sourcing changes the logistics
equation.
Second, powerful retailers and other end customers with clout are starting to push
value-added supply chain responsibilities further up the supply chain.
Global sourcing and the upstream migration of value-added logistics services are
certainly primary drivers. But other pieces of the puzzle have fallen into place in
recent years to make direct-to-store shipments feasible.
Several different types of supply chain inventories that would exist in a make-to-stock
environment, typical of items directed at the consumer. In this case, the models in this chapter
are most appropriate for the upper echelon inventories (retail and warehouse), and the lower
level and rank should use the Material Requirements Planning (MRP) technique.
The techniques described here are most appropriate when demand is difficult to predict with
great precision. In these models, we characterize demand by using a probability distribution
and maintain stock so that the risk associated with stock out is managed. For these
applications, the following three models are discussed:
1. The single-period model. This is used when we are making a one-time purchase of an
item. An example might be purchasing T-shirts to sell at a one-time sporting event.
2. Fixed-order quantity model. This is used when we want to maintain an item “in-
stock,” and when we resupply the item, a certain number of units must be ordered
each time. Inventory for the item is moni- tored until it gets down to a level where the
risk of stocking out is great enough that we are compelled to order.
3. Fixed-time period model. This is similar to the fi xed-order quantity model; it is used
when the item should be in-stock and ready to use. In this case, rather than monitoring
the inventory level and ordering
DEFINITION OF INVENTORY
INVENTORY COSTS
In making any decision that affects inventory size, the following cos must be considered:
1. Holding (or carrying) costs. This broad category includes the costs for storage
facilities, handling, insurance, pilferage, breakage, obsolescence depreciation, taxes,
and the opportunity cost of capital. Obviously, high holding costs tend to favor low
inventory levels and frequent replenishment.
2. Setup (or production change) costs. To make each different product involves obtaining
the necessary materials, arranging specific equipment setups, filling out the required
papers, appropriately charging time and materials, and moving out the previous stock
of material. If there were no costs or loss of time in changing from one product to
another, many small lots would be produced. This would reduce inventory levels, with
a resulting savings in cost. One challenge today is to try to reduce these setup costs to
permit smaller lot sizes. (This is the goal of a JIT system.)
3. Ordering costs. These costs refer to the managerial and clerical costs to prepare the
purchase or production order. Ordering costs include all the details, such as counting
items and calculating order quantities. The costs associated with maintaining the
system needed to track orders are also included in ordering costs.
4. Shortage costs. When the stock of an item is depleted, an order for that item must
either wait until the stock is replenished or be canceled. When the demand is not met
and the order is canceled, this is referred to as a stock out. A backorder is when the
order is held and filled at a later date when the inventory for the item is replenished.
An important characteristic of demand relates to whether demand is derived from an end item
or is related to the item itself. We use the terms independent demand and dependent demand
to describe this characteristic.
INVENTORY SYSTEMS
PhilAn inventory system provides the organizational structure and the operating policies for
maintaining and controlling goods to be stocked. The system is responsible for ordering and
receipt of goods: timing the order placement and keeping track of what has been ordered,
how much, and from whom. The system also must follow up to answer such questions as:
1. Has the supplier received the order?
2. Has it been shipped?
3. Are the dates correct?
4. Are the procedures established for reordering or returning undesirable merchandise?
Single-period inventory models are useful for a wide variety of service and manufacturing
applications. Consider the following:
1. Overbooking of airline flights. It is common for customers to cancel flight
reservations for a variety of reasons. Here the cost of underestimating the number of
cancellations is the revenue lost due to an empty seat on a flight. The cost of
overestimating cancellations is the awards, such as free flights or cash payments, that
are given to customers unable to board the flight.
2. Ordering of fashion items. A problem for a retailer selling fashion items is that often
only a single order can be placed for the entire season. This is often caused by long
lead times and limited life of the merchandise. The cost of underestimating demand is
the lost profit due to sales not made. The cost of overestimating demand is the cost
that results when it is discounted.
3. Any type of one-time order. For example, ordering T-shirts for a sporting event or
printing maps that become obsolete after a certain period of time.
System dictates the actual quantity ordered and the timing of the order.
The basic distinction is that fixed-order quantity models are “event triggered” and fixed-time
period models are “time triggered.” That is, a fixed-order quantity model initiates an order
when the event of reaching a specified reorder level occurs. This event may take place at any
time, depending on the demand for the items considered.
When the inventory position drops to 36, place an order for 57 more units. The simplest
models in this category occur when all aspects of the situation are known with certainty. If
the annual demand for a product is 1,000 units, it is precisely 1,000-not 1,000 plus or minus
10 percent. The same is true for setup costs and holding costs. Although the assumption of
complete certainty is rarely valid, it provides a good basis for our coverage of inventory
models.
In the nineteenth century Villefredo Pareto, in a study of the distribution of wealth in Milan,
found that 20 percent of the people controlled 80 percent of the wealth. This logic of the few
having the greatest importance and the many having little importance has been broadened to
include many situations and is termed the Pareto principle:
Any inventory system must specify when an order is to be placed for an item and how many
units to order. Most inventory control situations involve so many items that it is not practical
to model and give thorough treatment to each item. To get around this problem, the ABC
inventory classification scheme divides inventory items into three groupings:
1. High dollar/peso volume
2. Moderate dollar volume and
3. Low dollar/peso volume