Instant Download Ebook of Business Analysis and Valuation Ifrs Standards Edition 5Th Edition Krishna G Palepu Online Full Chapter PDF
Instant Download Ebook of Business Analysis and Valuation Ifrs Standards Edition 5Th Edition Krishna G Palepu Online Full Chapter PDF
Instant Download Ebook of Business Analysis and Valuation Ifrs Standards Edition 5Th Edition Krishna G Palepu Online Full Chapter PDF
https://ebookmeta.com/product/applying-ifrs-standards-4th-
edition-ruth-picker/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/wiley-2021-interpretation-and-
application-of-ifrs-standards-1st-edition-pkf-international-ltd/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/real-analysis-and-foundations-5th-
edition-steven-g-krantz/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/business-analysis-valuation-using-
financial-statements-third-asia-pacific-edition-victor-lewis-
bernard/
Wiley 2023 Interpretation and Application of IFRS
Standards 1st Edition P. K. F. Pkf Internation
https://ebookmeta.com/product/wiley-2023-interpretation-and-
application-of-ifrs-standards-1st-edition-p-k-f-pkf-internation/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/equity-valuation-and-analysis-1st-
edition-richard-sloan-russell-lundholm/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/computational-topology-for-data-
analysis-tamal-krishna-dey/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/financial-statements-analysis-
reporting-and-valuation-2nd-edition-felix-i-lessambo/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/primary-mathematics-3a-hoerst/
BUSINESS
ANALYSIS
AND
VALUATION
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
This is an electronic version of the print textbook. Due to electronic rights restrictions,
some third party content may be suppressed. Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed
content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. The publisher reserves the right
to remove content from this title at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it. For
valuable information on pricing, previous editions, changes to current editions, and alternate
formats, please visit www.cengage.com/highered to search by ISBN#, author, title, or keyword for
materials in your areas of interest.
Important Notice: Media content referenced within the product description or the product
text may not be available in the eBook version.
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Business Analysis and Valuation: © 2019, Cengage Learning EMEA
IFRS Standards edition, 5th Edition
Krishna G. Palepu, Paul M. Healy WCN: 02-300
& Erik Peek ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright
herein may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any
Publisher: Annabel Ainscow means, except as permitted by U.S. copyright law, without the prior
List Manager: Jenny Grene written permission of the copyright owner.
Marketing Manager: Sophie Clarke While the publisher has taken all reasonable care in the preparation of
Senior Content Project Manager: this book, the publisher makes no representation, express or implied,
Sue Povey with regard to the accuracy of the information contained in this book
Manufacturing Buyer: Elaine Bevan and cannot accept any legal responsibility or liability for any errors or
omissions from the book or the consequences thereof.
Typesetter: SPi Global
Products and services that are referred to in this book may be
Text Design: Design Deluxe Ltd
either trademarks and/or registered trademarks of their respective
Cover design: Simon Levy Associates owners. The publishers and author/s make no claim to these
Cover Image(s): nats77/Getty Images trademarks. The publisher does not endorse, and accepts no
responsibility or liability for, incorrect or defamatory content
contained in hyperlinked material.
All the URLs in this book are correct at the time of going to press;
however the Publisher accepts no responsibility for the content and
continued availability of third party websites.
ISBN: 978-1-4737-5842-1
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Brief contents
PART I Framework 1
1 A framework for business analysis and valuation using financial statements 2
iii
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Contents
Preface viii
Acknowledgements xii
PART II
Authors xiii Business analysis and valuation
Digital Support Resources xiv
tools 45
iv
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Contents v
Step 5: Identify potential red flags 84 Problem 3 H&M and Inditex’s non-current assets 155
Step 6: Recast financial statements and undo accounting Notes 156
distortions 85
CASE Accounting for the iPhone Upgrade Program (A) 158
Recasting financial statements 86
Some complications 86
Categories of financial statement items 87
5 Financial analysis 174
Ratio analysis 174
Accounting analysis pitfalls 95 Measuring overall profitability 178
Conservative accounting is not “good” accounting 95 Decomposing profitability: Traditional approach 179
Not all unusual accounting is questionable 96 Decomposing profitability: Alternative approach 180
Common accounting standards are not the same as common Assessing operating management: Decomposing net profit
accounting practices 96 margins 184
Value of accounting data and accounting analysis 96 Evaluating investment management: Decomposing asset
Summary 97 turnover 188
Evaluating financial management: Financial leverage 191
Core concepts 97
Putting it all together: Assessing sustainable growth rate 194
Questions, exercises, and problems 98 Historical patterns of ratios for European firms 197
Problem 1 Key accounting policies 99 Cash flow analysis 197
Problem 2 Fashion retailers’ key accounting policies 99 Cash flow and funds flow statements 197
Problem 3 Euro Disney and the first five steps of Analyzing cash flow information 199
accounting analysis 100 Analysis of Hennes & Mauritz’s and Inditex’s cash flow 202
Notes 102 Summary 203
Appendix A: First-time adoption of IFRS Standards 104 Core concepts 203
Appendix B: Recasting financial statements into Questions, exercises, and problems 205
standardized templates 105 Problem 1 ROE decomposition 205
Case Toshiba: Accounting fraud 111 Problem 2 Ratios of three fashion retailers 208
Problem 3 The Fiat Group in 2008 211
4 Accounting analysis: Accounting Problem 4 Ahold versus Delhaize 213
adjustments 118 Notes 215
Recognition of assets 118
Who owns or controls resources? 119 Appendix: Hennes & Mauritz AB financial statements 216
Can economic benefits be measured with reasonable CASE Carrefour S.A. 221
certainty? 120
Have fair values of assets declined below book value? 120 6 Prospective analysis: Forecasting 232
Are fair value estimates accurate? 121 The overall structure of the forecast 232
Asset distortions 122 A Practical Framework for Forecasting 233
Recognition of liabilities 140 Information for forecasting 234
Has an obligation been incurred? 140 Performance behavior: A starting point 235
Can the obligation be measured? 140 Revenue growth behavior 236
Liability distortions 141 Earnings behavior 236
Returns on equity behavior 237
Equity distortions 147
The behavior of components of ROE 238
Contingent claims 147
Forecasting assumptions 239
Summary 148
Background: Macroeconomic and industry growth 239
Core concepts 149 Revenue growth 240
Questions, exercises, and problems 150 NOPAT margins 243
Problem 1 Impairment of non-current assets 153 Working capital to revenue 245
Problem 2 Audi, BMW, and Skoda’s research and Non-current assets to revenue 246
development 153 Non-operating investments 247
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
vi Contents
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Contents vii
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Preface
F inancial statements are the basis for a wide range of business analyses. Managers use them to monitor and judge
their firms’ performance relative to competitors, to communicate with external investors, to help judge what
financial policies they should pursue, and to evaluate potential new businesses to acquire as part of their investment
strategy. Securities analysts use financial statements to rate and value companies they recommend to clients. Bankers
use them in deciding whether to extend a loan to a client and to determine the loan’s terms. Investment bankers
use them as a basis for valuing and analyzing prospective buyouts, mergers, and acquisitions. And consultants use
them as a basis for competitive analysis for their clients. Not surprisingly, therefore, there is a strong demand among
business students for a course that provides a framework for using financial statement data in a variety of business
analysis and valuation contexts. The purpose of this book is to provide such a framework for business students and
practitioners. This IFRS Standards edition is the European adaptation of the authoritative US edition – authored by
Krishna G. Palepu and Paul M. Healy – that has been used in Accounting and Finance departments in universities
around the world. In 2007 we decided to write the first IFRS Standards edition because of the European business
environment’s unique character and the introduction of mandatory IFRS Standards reporting for public corpora-
tions in the European Union. This fifth IFRS Standards edition is a thorough update of the successful fourth edition,
incorporating new examples, cases, problems and exercises, and regulatory updates.
viii
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Preface ix
●● Chapter 10 on credit analysis includes a discussion of how credit ratings and default probability estimates can
be used in debt valuation. Chapter 11 on M&A analysis includes a discussion on how to perform a purchase
price allocation using the tools and techniques from Chapters 5 through 8.
●● Data, analyses, problems, and examples have been thoroughly updated in the fifth edition.
●● We have updated some of the fourth IFRS Standards edition’s cases (‘Carrefour SA,’ ‘Forecasting Earnings
and Earnings Growth in the European Oil and Gas Industry,’ ‘Two European Hotel Groups’) and have
included eight new cases: ‘Akris: Competition in the High-End Fashion Industry,’ ‘Toshiba: Accounting Fraud,’
‘Accounting for the iPhone Upgrade Program,’ ‘Valuation Multiples in Fast Fashion,’ ‘Ferrari: The 2015 Initial
Public Offering,’ ‘Tesco: From Troubles to Turnaround,’ ‘Spotify’s Direct Listing IPO,’ and ‘Valuing Europe’s fast-
est growing company: HelloFresh in 2017.’
Key features
This book differs from other texts in business and financial analysis in a number of important ways. We introduce
and develop a framework for business analysis and valuation using financial statement data. We then show how this
framework can be applied to a variety of decision contexts.
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
x Preface
valuation models, we integrate the latest academic research with traditional approaches such as earnings and book
value multiples that are widely used in practice.
While we cover all four steps of business analysis and valuation in the book, we recognize that the extent of
their use depends on the user’s decision context. For example, bankers are likely to use business strategy analysis,
accounting analysis, financial analysis, and the forecasting portion of prospective analysis. They are less likely to be
interested in formally valuing a prospective client.
Companion website
A companion website accompanies this book. This website contains the following valuable material for instructors
and students:
●● Instructions for how to easily produce standardized financial statements in Excel.
●● Spreadsheets containing: (1) the reported and standardized financial statements of Hennes & Mauritz (H&M)
and Inditex; (2) calculations of H&M’s and Inditex’s ratios (presented in Chapter 5); (3) H&M’s forecasted
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Preface xi
financial statements (presented in Chapter 6); and (4) valuations of H&M’s shares (presented in Chapter 8).
Using these spreadsheets students can easily replicate the analyses presented in Chapters 5 through 8 and
perform “what-if ” analyses – i.e., to find out how the reported numbers change as a result of changes to the
standardized statements or forecasting assumptions.
●● Spreadsheets containing case material.
●● Answers to the discussion questions and case instructions (for instructors only).
●● A complete set of lecture slides (for instructors only).
Accompanying teaching notes to some of the case studies can be found at www.harvardbusiness.org or www.
thecasecentre.org. Lecturers are able to register to access the teaching notes and other relevant information.
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Acknowledgements
xii
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Authors
KRISHNA G. PALEPU is the Ross Graham Walker Professor of Business Administration and Senior Advisor to the
President of Harvard University. During the past 25 years, Professor Palepu’s research has focused on corporate
strategy, governance, and disclosure. Professor Palepu is the winner of the American Accounting Association’s
Notable Contributions to Accounting Literature Award (in 1999) and the Wildman Award (in 1997).
PAUL M. HEALY is the James R. Williston Professor of Business Administration and Senior Associate Dean for Faculty
Development at the Harvard Business School. Professor Healy’s research has focused on corporate governance and
disclosure, mergers and acquisitions, earnings management, and management compensation. He has previously
worked at the MIT Sloan School of Management, ICI Ltd, and Arthur Young in New Zealand. Professor Healy
has won the Notable Contributions to Accounting Literature Award (in 1990 and 1999) and the Wild-man Award
(in 1997) for contributions to practice.
ERIK PEEK is Professor of Business Analysis and Valuation at Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University,
the Netherlands. Prior to joining RSM Erasmus University he has been an Associate Professor at Maastricht
University and a Visiting Associate Professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Professor
Peek is a CFA charterholder and holds a PhD from the VU University Amsterdam. His research has focused on
international accounting, financial analysis and valuation, and earnings management.
xiii
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
C engage’s peer reviewed content for higher and
further education courses is accompanied by a range
of digital teaching and learning support resources. The
resources are carefully tailored to the specific needs of
the instructor, student and the course. Examples of the
kind of resources provided include:
be unstoppable
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Framework
PART I
1 A framework for business analysis and valuation using financial statements
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
1 Avaluation
framework for business analysis and
using financial statements
This chapter outlines a comprehensive framework for financial statement analysis. Because financial state-
ments provide the most widely available data on public corporations’ economic activities, investors and other
stakeholders rely on financial reports to assess the plans and performance of firms and corporate managers.
A variety of questions can be addressed by business analysis using financial statements, as shown in the
following examples:
●● A security analyst may be interested in asking: “How well is the firm I am following performing? Did
the firm meet my performance expectations? If not, why not? What is the value of the firm’s stock given
my assessment of the firm’s current and future performance?”
●● A loan officer may need to ask: “What is the credit risk involved in lending a certain amount of money
to this firm? How well is the firm managing its liquidity and solvency? What is the firm’s business risk?
What is the additional risk created by the firm’s financing and dividend policies?”
●● A management consultant might ask: “What is the structure of the industry in which the firm is operat-
ing? What are the strategies pursued by various players in the industry? What is the relative performance
of different firms in the industry?”
●● A corporate manager may ask: “Is my firm properly valued by investors? Is our investor communication
program adequate to facilitate this process?”
●● A corporate manager could ask: “Is this firm a potential takeover target? How much value can be added
if we acquire this firm? How can we finance the acquisition?”
●● An independent auditor would want to ask: “Are the accounting policies and accrual estimates in this
company’s financial statements consistent with my understanding of this business and its recent perfor-
mance? Do these financial reports communicate the current status and significant risks of the business?”
In almost all countries in the world today, capital markets play an important role in channeling financial
resources from savers to business enterprises that need capital. Financial statement analysis is a valuable activity
when managers have complete information on a firm’s strategies, and a variety of institutional factors make it
unlikely that they fully disclose this information to suppliers of capital. In this setting, outside analysts attempt
to create “inside information” from analyzing financial statement data, thereby gaining valuable insights about
the firm’s current performance and future prospects.
To understand the contribution that financial statement analysis can make, it is important to understand the
role of financial reporting in the functioning of capital markets and the institutional forces that shape financial
statements. Therefore we present first a brief description of these forces; then we discuss the steps that an analyst
must perform to extract information from financial statements and provide valuable forecasts.
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 A framework for business analysis and valuation using financial statements 3
Savings
Financial Information
intermediaries intermediaries
Business
ideas
Figure 1.1 provides a schematic representation of how capital markets typically work. Savings in any econ-
omy are widely distributed among households. There are usually many new entrepreneurs and existing compa-
nies that would like to attract these savings to fund their business ideas. While both savers and entrepreneurs
would like to do business with each other, matching savings to business investment opportunities through the
use of capital markets – funding business ideas with the highest prospects first – is complicated for at least
three reasons:
●● Information asymmetry between savers and entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurs typically have better
information than savers on the value of business investment opportunities.
●● Potentially conflicting interests – credibility problems. Communication by entrepreneurs to savers is
not completely credible because savers know that entrepreneurs have an incentive to inflate the value of
their ideas.
●● Expertise asymmetry. Savers generally lack the financial sophistication needed to analyze and
differentiate between the various business opportunities.
The information and incentive issues lead to what economists call the lemons problem, which can potentially
break down the functioning of the capital market.1 It works like this. Consider a situation where half the busi-
ness ideas are “good” and the other half are “bad.” If investors cannot distinguish between the two types of
business ideas, entrepreneurs with “bad” ideas will try to claim that their ideas are as valuable as the “good”
ideas. Realizing this possibility, investors value both good and bad ideas at an average level. Unfortunately,
this penalizes good ideas, and entrepreneurs with good ideas find the terms on which they can get financing
to be unattractive. As these entrepreneurs leave the capital market, the proportion of bad ideas in the market
increases. Over time, bad ideas “crowd out” good ideas, and investors lose confidence in this market.
The emergence of intermediaries can prevent such a market breakdown. Intermediaries are like a car
mechanic who provides an independent certification of a used car’s quality to help a buyer and seller agree on
a price. There are two types of intermediaries in the capital markets. Financial intermediaries, such as venture
capital firms, banks, collective investment funds, pension funds, and insurance companies, focus on aggregating
funds from individual investors and analyzing different investment alternatives to make investment decisions.
Information intermediaries, such as auditors, financial analysts, credit-rating agencies, and the financial press,
focus on providing or assuring information to investors (and to financial intermediaries who represent them)
on the quality of various business investment opportunities. Both these types of intermediaries add value by
helping investors distinguish “good” investment opportunities from the “bad” ones.
The relative importance of financial intermediaries and information intermediaries varies from country to
country for historical reasons. In countries where individual investors traditionally have had strong legal rights
to discipline entrepreneurs who invest in “bad” business ideas, such as in the UK, individual investors have
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
4 PART I Framework
been more inclined to make their own investment decisions. In these countries, the funds that entrepreneurs
attract may come from a widely dispersed group of individual investors and be channeled through public stock
exchanges. Information intermediaries consequently play an important role in supplying individual investors
with the information that they need to distinguish between “good” and “bad” business ideas. In contrast, in
countries where individual investors traditionally have had weak legal rights to discipline entrepreneurs, such
as in many Continental European countries, individual investors have been more inclined to rely on the help
of financial intermediaries. In these countries, financial intermediaries, such as banks, tend to supply most of
the funds to entrepreneurs and can get privileged access to entrepreneurs’ private information.
Over the past decade, many countries in Europe have been moving towards a model of strong legal protection
of investors’ rights to discipline entrepreneurs and well-developed stock exchanges. In this model, financial
reporting plays a critical role in the functioning of both the information intermediaries and the financial
intermediaries. Information intermediaries add value either by enhancing the credibility of financial reports
(as auditors do) or by analyzing the information in the financial statements (as analysts and rating agencies do).
Financial intermediaries rely on the information in the financial statements to analyze investment opportunities
and supplement this information with other sources of information.
Ideally, the various intermediaries serve as a system of checks and balances to ensure the efficient functioning
of the capital markets system. However, this is not always the case as on occasion the intermediaries tend to
mutually reinforce rather than counterbalance each other. A number of problems can arise as a result of incen-
tive issues, governance issues within the intermediary organizations themselves, and conflicts of interest, as
evidenced by accounting scandals at companies such as Carillion, Olympus, Steinhoff, and Tesco. However, in
general this market mechanism functions efficiently, and prices reflect all available information on a particular
investment. Despite this overall market efficiency, individual securities may still be temporarily mispriced,
thereby justifying the need for financial statement analysis.
In the following section, we discuss key aspects of the financial reporting system design that enable it to play
effectively this vital role in the functioning of the capital markets.
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 A framework for business analysis and valuation using financial statements 5
4 A statement of other comprehensive income that outlines the sources of changes in equity that are (a) not
the result of transactions with the owners of the firm and (b) not included in the income statement.3
5 A statement of changes in equity that summarizes all sources of changes in equity during the period
between two consecutive balance sheets, consisting of (a) total comprehensive income – being the sum of
profit or loss [item 1] and other comprehensive income [item 4] – and (b) the financial effects of transac-
tions with the owners of the firm.
These statements are accompanied by notes that provide additional details on the financial statement line
items, as well as by management’s narrative discussion of the firm’s activities, performance, and risks in the
Management Commentary section.4
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
6 PART I Framework
primary periodic performance index under accrual accounting. To compute profit or loss, the effects of eco-
nomic transactions are recorded on the basis of expected, not necessarily actual, cash receipts and payments.
Expected cash receipts from the delivery of products or services are recognized as revenues, and expected cash
outflows associated with these revenues are recognized as expenses. Timing differences between the moment of
recording costs or benefits and the moment of experiencing cash inflows or outflows result in the recognition
of assets and liabilities on the balance sheet.
While many rules and conventions govern a firm’s preparation of financial statements, only a few conceptual
building blocks form the foundation of accrual accounting. Starting from the balance sheet, the principles that
define a firm’s assets, liabilities, and equity are as follows:
●● Assets are economic resources controlled by a firm that (a) have the potential to produce future economic
benefits and (b) are measurable with a reasonable degree of certainty. An example of an asset is a firm’s
inventories that will produce economic benefits once sold and delivered to the firm’s customers.
●● Liabilities are economic obligations of a firm that (a) arise from benefits received in the past, (b) have the
potential of being required to be met, and (c) cannot be feasibly avoided by the firm. Examples of liabili-
ties are bonds or bank loans that must be settled in cash or performance obligations that must be settled
by providing services to a customer.
●● Equity is the difference between a firm’s assets and its liabilities.
The definitions of assets, liabilities, and equity lead to the fundamental relationship that governs a firm’s bal-
ance sheet:
Assets 5 Liabilities 1 Equity
The following definitions are critical to the (comprehensive) income statement, which summarizes a firm’s
income and expenses:5
●● Income or revenue consists of economic resources earned (or increases in assets that affect equity) and
performance obligations settled (or decreases in liabilities that affect equity) during a time period. Revenue
recognition is governed by the realization principle, which proposes that revenues should be recognized
when (a) the firm has provided all, or substantially all, the goods or services to be delivered to the customer
and (b) the customer has paid cash or is expected to pay cash with a reasonable degree of certainty.
●● Expenses are economic resources used up (or decreases in assets that affect equity) and economic
obligations created (or increases in liabilities that affect equity) during a time period.
●● Profit or loss is the difference between a firm’s income and expenses in a time period. The following
fundamental relationship is therefore reflected in a firm’s income statement:
Profit or loss 5 Income 2 Expenses
Note from the preceding definitions that the recognition of income and expenses depends on a firm’s mea-
surement of its assets and liabilities. A consistent application of the principles that define assets and liabilities
implies that associated elements of income and expenses are recognized in the income statement in the same
time period – a process that is also referred to as matching of income and expenses. For example, after a firm
has sold and delivered goods to a customer, an increase in the asset “trade receivables” combined with a simul-
taneous decrease in the asset “inventories” lead to the recognition of associated income and expense in the
same time period.
Remeasurements of assets or liabilities may also result in the recognition of income or expense items that
are not related to the firm’s current economic activities. For instance, when a firm holds inventories that have
suddenly become obsolete, writing down the value of such assets will cause the recognition of an expense item
that is unrelated to the firm’s current economic transactions. In sum, expenses are (a) costs directly associated
with revenues recognized in the same period (such as the cost of inventory sold), or (b) costs associated with
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 A framework for business analysis and valuation using financial statements 7
benefits that are consumed in this time period (such as depreciation on non-current assets used in the period),
or (c) resources whose future benefits are not reasonably certain (such as research expenditures or inventory
write-downs).
The need for accrual accounting arises from investors’ demand for financial reports on a periodic basis.
Because firms undertake economic transactions on a continual basis, the arbitrary closing of accounting books
at the end of a reporting period leads to a fundamental measurement problem. Because cash accounting does
not report the full economic consequence of the transactions undertaken in a given period, accrual accounting
is designed to provide more complete information on a firm’s periodic performance.
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
8 PART I Framework
set accounting standards for private companies and for single entity financial statements of public compa-
nies or comment on the IASB’s drafts of new or modified standards.6
●● UK-based public companies must continue to prepare IFRS Standards-based consolidated financial state-
ments, even after the United Kingdom’s exit from the EU.
●● Since 2005 and 2007, respectively, Australian and New Zealand public companies must comply with
locally adopted IFRS Standards, labelled A-IFRS Standards and NZ-IFRS Standards. These sets of
standards include all IFRS Standards requirements as well as some additional disclosure requirements.
●● South African public companies have prepared financial statements that comply with IFRS Standards, as
published by the IASB, since 2005.
●● Some other large economies with stock exchanges that require (most) publicly listed companies to pre-
pare IFRS Standards-compliant financial statements are Brazil (since 2010), Canada (2011), Korea (2011),
Mexico (2012), and Russia (2012).
In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has the legal authority to set account-
ing standards. Since 1973 the SEC has relied on the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), a private
sector accounting body, to undertake this task.
Uniform accounting standards attempt to reduce managers’ ability to record similar economic transactions
in dissimilar ways either over time or across firms. Thus the standards create a uniform accounting language,
improve the comparability of financial statements, and increase the credibility of financial statements by limiting
a firm’s ability to distort them. Increased uniformity from accounting standards, however, comes at the expense
of reduced flexibility for managers to reflect genuine business differences in a firm’s accounting decisions. Rigid
accounting standards work best for economic transactions whose accounting treatment is not predicated on
managers’ proprietary information. However, when there is significant business judgment involved in assess-
ing a transaction’s economic consequences (such as in determining the economic benefits of product develop-
ment), rigid standards (such as requiring the immediate expensing of product development outlays) are likely
to be dysfunctional for some companies because the standards prevent managers from using their superior
business knowledge to determine how best to report the economics of key business events. Further, if account-
ing standards are too rigid, they may induce managers to expend economic resources to restructure business
transactions to achieve a desired accounting result or forego transactions that may be difficult to report on.
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 A framework for business analysis and valuation using financial statements 9
basis. For example, managers can choose accounting policies and estimates to provide an optimistic assessment
of the firm’s true performance. They can also make it costly for investors to understand the true performance
by controlling the extent of information that is disclosed voluntarily.
The extent to which financial statements are informative about the underlying business reality varies across
firms and across time for a given firm. This variation in accounting quality provides both an important oppor-
tunity and a challenge in doing business analysis. The process through which analysts can separate noise from
information in financial statements, and gain valuable business insights from financial statement analysis, is
discussed in the following section.
Legal liability
The legal environment in which accounting disputes between managers, auditors, and investors are adjudi-
cated can also have a significant effect on the quality of reported numbers. The threat of lawsuits and result-
ing penalties have the beneficial effect of improving the accuracy of disclosure. In the EU, the Transparency
Directive requires that every member state has established a statutory civil liability regime for misstatements
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
10 PART I Framework
that managers make in their periodic disclosures to investors. However, legal liability regimes vary in strict-
ness across countries, both within and outside Europe. Under strict regimes, such as that found in the United
States, investors can hold managers liable for their investment losses if the investors prove that the firm’s disclo-
sures were misleading, that they relied on the misleading disclosures, and that their losses were caused by the
misleading disclosures. Under less strict regimes, such as those found in France, Germany, and several other
Continental European countries, investors must additionally prove that managers were (grossly) negligent in
their reporting or even had the intent to harm investors (i.e., committed fraud).7 Further, in some countries
only misstatements in annual and interim financial reports are subject to liability, whereas in other countries
investors can hold managers liable also for misleading ad hoc disclosures.
The potential for significant legal liability might also discourage managers and auditors from supporting
accounting proposals requiring risky forecasts – for example, forward-looking disclosures. This type of concern
has motivated several European countries to adopt a less strict liability regime.8
Public enforcement
Several countries adhere to the idea that strong accounting standards, external auditing, and the threat of legal
liability do not suffice to ensure that financial statements provide a truthful picture of economic reality. As a final
guarantee on reporting quality, these countries have public enforcement bodies that either proactively or on a
complaint basis initiate reviews of companies’ compliance with accounting standards and take actions to correct
noncompliance. In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) performs such reviews
and frequently disciplines companies for violations of US GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles).
In recent years, several European countries have also set up proactive enforcement agencies that should enforce
listed companies’ compliance with IFRS Standards. Examples of such agencies are the French AMF (Autorité
des Marchés Financiers), the German DPR (Deutsche Prüfstelle für Rechnungslegung), the Italian CONSOB
(Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa), and the UK Financial Reporting Council. Because each Euro-
pean country maintains control of domestic enforcement, there is a risk that the enforcement of IFRS Standards
exhibits differences in strictness and focus across Europe. To coordinate enforcement activities, however, most
European enforcement agencies cooperate under the stimulus of the European Securities and Markets Authority
(ESMA). One of the ESMA’s tasks is to develop mechanisms that lead to consistent enforcement across Europe.
For example, the ESMA organizes peer reviews of national enforcement agencies and promotes best practices
through the publication of peer review reports and guidelines. The coming years will show whether a decen-
tralized system of enforcement can consistently assure that European companies comply with IFRS Standards.
Public enforcement bodies cannot ensure full compliance of all listed companies. In fact, most proactive
enforcement bodies conduct their investigations on a sampling basis. For example, the enforcement bodies
may periodically select industry sectors on which they focus their enforcement activities and select individual
companies either at random or on the basis of company characteristics such as poor governance. The set of
variables that European enforcers most commonly use to select companies includes market capitalization or
trading volume (both measuring the company’s economic relevance), share price volatility, the likelihood of
new equity issues, and the inclusion of the company in an index.9
Strict public enforcement can also reduce the quality of financial reporting because, in their attempt to
avoid an accounting credibility crisis on public capital markets, enforcement bodies may pressure companies
to exercise excessive prudence in their accounting choices.
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 A framework for business analysis and valuation using financial statements 11
external investors and analysts: meetings with analysts to publicize the firm and expanded voluntary disclosure.
These forms of communication are typically not mutually exclusive.
T he fact that most countries have a public enforcement agency does not, of course, imply that all countries have
equally developed effective enforcement systems. One measure of the development of public enforcement is
how much a country spends on enforcement. A study has shown that there still is significant variation worldwide in
enforcement agencies’ staff and budget size. For example, in the late 2000s, agencies in Italy, the Netherlands, the
United Kingdom, and the United States spent more than twice as much as their peers in France, Germany, Spain,
and Sweden.10 Although public enforcement has important preventive effects – it deters violations of accounting
rules just through its presence – another measure of its development is an enforcement agency’s activity, potentially
measured by the number of investigations held and the number of actions taken against public companies. Most
agencies disclose annual reports summarizing their activities. In addition, the ESMA periodically publishes extracts
from its confidential database of enforcement decisions taken by the national agencies. These reports illustrate that
many actions taken by enforcement agencies (a) target poor disclosure quality (45 percent of all actions in 2017)
and (b) are recommendations to firms on how to improve their reporting and better comply with IFRS Standards in
the future (75 percent of all actions in 2017). In several cases the agencies took corrective actions. Following are two
examples of such actions:
●● In the year ending in March 2017, the UK Financial Reporting Council reviewed 203 annual reports, 183 on its
own initiative and 20 in response to complaints or referrals. In only a few cases a firm had to either restate its
current financial statements or adjust the prior period figures in its next financial statements. For example, in
2015 Learning Technologies Group (LTG) acquired Eukleia, a provider of e-learning services, for £8.3 million
plus a contingent consideration estimated at £2.2 million, based on future revenue growth. Because part of the
contingent consideration was payable to Eukleia’s employees, LTG was asked to charge an amount of £335
thousand as remuneration to the comparative income statement for 2016. In its 2015 financial statements, LTG
had incorrectly capitalized this amount.
●● In May 2016 the German supervisory authority (DPR) publicly “named and shamed” solar power specialist
Phoenix Solar AG. The DPR disclosed that Phoenix Solar had reduced transparency by disclosing two different
income statements in its 2014 financial statements, one of which did not comply with IFRS Standards 5 on
discontinued operations.
ANALYST MEETINGS
One popular way for managers to help mitigate information problems is to meet regularly with financial ana-
lysts that follow the firm. At these meetings management will field questions about the firm’s current financial
performance and discuss its future business plans. In addition to holding analyst meetings, many firms appoint
a director of public relations, who provides further regular contact with analysts seeking more information on
the firm.
Conference calls have become a popular forum for management to communicate with financial analysts.
Research finds that firms are more likely to host calls if they are in industries where financial statement data
fail to capture key business fundamentals on a timely basis.11 In addition, conference calls themselves appear to
provide new information to analysts about a firm’s performance and future prospects.12 Smaller and less heavily
traded firms in particular benefit from initiating investor conference calls.13
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
12 PART I Framework
While firms continue to meet with analysts, rules such as the EU Market Abuse Directive affect the nature
of these interactions. Under these rules, all EU countries must have regulations and institutions in place that
prevent unfair disclosure. Specifically, countries must ensure that exchange-listed companies disclose non-
public private information promptly and simultaneously to all investors. This can reduce the information that
managers are willing to disclose in conference calls and private meetings, making these less effective forums
for resolving information problems.
VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE
Another way for managers to improve the credibility of their financial reporting is through voluntary disclo-
sure. Accounting rules usually prescribe minimum disclosure requirements, but they do not restrict managers
from voluntarily providing additional information. These could include an articulation of the company’s long-
term strategy, specification of non-financial leading indicators that are useful in judging the effectiveness of
the strategy implementation, explanation of the relationship between the leading indicators and future profits,
and forecasts of future performance. Voluntary disclosures can be reported in the firm’s annual report, in bro-
chures created to describe the firm to investors, in management meetings with analysts, or in investor relations
responses to information requests.14
One constraint on expanded disclosure is the competitive dynamics in product markets. Disclosure of propri-
etary information on strategies and their expected economic consequences may hurt the firm’s competitive posi-
tion. Managers then face a trade-off between providing information that is useful to investors in assessing the
firm’s economic performance, and withholding information to maximize the firm’s product market advantage.
A second constraint in providing voluntary disclosure is management’s legal liability. Forecasts and voluntary
disclosures can potentially be used by dissatisfied shareholders to bring civil actions against management for
providing misleading information. This seems ironic, since voluntary disclosures should provide investors with
additional information. Unfortunately, it can be difficult for courts to decide whether managers’ disclosures
were good-faith estimates of uncertain future events which later did not materialize, or whether management
manipulated the market. Consequently, many corporate legal departments recommend against management
providing much in the way of voluntary disclosure. One aspect of corporate governance, earnings guidance,
has been particularly controversial. There is substantial evidence that the guidance provided by management
plays an important role in leading analysts’ expectations towards achievable profit targets, and that management
guidance is more likely when analysts’ initial forecasts are overly optimistic.15
Finally, management credibility can limit a firm’s incentives to provide voluntary disclosures. If manage-
ment faces a credibility problem in financial reporting, any voluntary disclosures it provides are also likely to
be viewed skeptically. In particular, investors may be concerned about what management is not telling them,
particularly since such disclosures are not audited.
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Chapter 1 A framework for business analysis and valuation using financial statements 13
information, they rely on their knowledge of the firm’s industry and its competitive strategies to interpret
financial statements. Successful intermediaries have at least as good an understanding of the industry econom-
ics as do the firm’s managers, as well as a reasonably good understanding of the firm’s competitive strategy.
Although outside analysts have an information disadvantage relative to the firm’s managers, these analysts are
more objective in evaluating the economic consequences of the firm’s investment and operating decisions.
D uring the past 15 years, the European Commission has issued or revised a few Directives and Regulations that
significantly affect financial reporting and auditing practices in the EU. The Revised Statutory Audit Directive and
Regulation (SAD; effective since 2014) regulates the audit of financial statements. In addition, the Amended Transpar-
ency Directive (TD; 2013) and the Revised Market Abuse Directive and Regulation (MAD; 2014) regulate firms’ periodic
and ad hoc disclosures, with the objective to improve the quality and timeliness of information provided to investors.
Some of the highlights of these Directives and Regulations include:
●● Prescribing that firms issuing public debt or equity securities (public firms) publish their annual report no more
than four months after the financial year-end. The annual report must contain the audited financial statements,
a management report, and management’s responsibility statement certifying that the financial statements give a
true and fair view of the firm’s performance and financial position (TD).
●● Requiring that public firms publish semiannual financial reports, including condensed financial statements, an
interim management report, and a responsibility statement, within two months of the end of the first half of the
fiscal year. The firms must also indicate whether the interim financial statements have been audited or reviewed
by an auditor (TD).
●● Ensuring that each EU member state has a central filing and storage system for public financial
reports (TD).
●● Requiring that public firms prepare annual financial reports in a single electronic format as of 2020 (TD).
●● Requiring that public firms immediately disclose any information that may have a material impact on their
security price and prohibiting that insiders to the firm trade on such information before its disclosure (TD, MAD).
●● Requiring that the member states impose common criminal sanctions for insider trading offences (MAD).
●● Prohibiting that the external auditor provides any nonaudit services to the audited firm that may compromise his
independence, such as tax advice and valuation services (SAD).
●● Enhancing auditor independence by prescribing that the external auditor does not audit the same firm for more
than ten consecutive years, unless a second ten-year period follows a public tender (SAD).
●● Requiring that all audits are carried out in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (SAD).
●● Requiring that all audit firms are subject to a system of external quality assurance and public oversight (SAD).
●● Mandating that each public firm has an audit committee, which monitors the firm’s financial reporting process,
internal control system and statutory audit (SAD).
●● Ensuring that each EU member state designates a competent authority responsible for supervising firms’
compliance with the provisions of the Directives (SAD, TD, MAD).
Each EU member state must implement the Directives by introducing new or changing existing national legislation.
This has at least two important consequences. First, because the member states have some freedom in deciding how
to comply with the Directives, some differences in financial reporting, disclosure, and auditing regulation continue to
exist. Second, in spite of the United Kingdom’s exit from the EU, national UK legislation reflects many elements of the
preceding Directives.
Copyright 2019 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).
Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Nella camera termale o caldarium era da una parte il bagno d’acqua
calda detto alveus e dall’altra il laconicum, o alcova semicircolare,
riscaldata da una fornace e da tubi, hypocausis, sotto il pavimento e
attraverso le pareti praticate espressamente vuote. Fu detto
laconicum, perchè l’uso ne fu dapprima introdotto fra i Lacedemoni,
e nel pompejano di cui parlo stava in mezzo il labrum, di cui spiegai
lo scopo più sopra; ch’era cioè là vasca a fondo piano che
conteneva l’acqua della qual s’aspergeva il balneante mentre gli si
raschiava il sudore prodotto dalla temperatura elevata a cui eran
mantenute le stanze, e immediatamente su di essi v’era un’apertura,
lumen, che poteva esser chiusa od aperta con un disco di metallo
detto clipeus, sospeso mediante catene, secondo si fosse voluto
abbassare od elevare il grado di calore, come è indicato da Vitruvio.
Tre finestre quadrate si veggono nella vôlta del laconicum ed eran
chiuse con vetri, lapis specularis, e vietavano l’entrata dell’aria. La
seguente iscrizione venne decifrata sui bordi del bacino, scrittavi in
lettere di bronzo:
GN. MELISSARO GN. F. APRO. M. STAIO. M.
F. RVFO II. VIR. ITER. I. D. LABRVM EX D. D.
EX P. P. F. C. CONSTAT H. S. DCC. L. [200]
Se fu dato potersi formulare a proverbio: di’ con chi tratti e ti dirò chi
sei; parrebbe potersi eziandio dire, di’ come si istruisca un popolo e
ti dirò quanto sia civile. Questo per adesso: forse non si poteva
altrettanto affermare ai tempi di Roma, dei quali m’intrattengo col
discreto e umano lettore.
Egli vedrà s’io mal non m’apponga nelle poche pagine che ho
riserbato alle Scuole, traendone argomento dalle due di cui gli
avanzi di Pompei ci han tramandato memoria.
La parola, come tanta parte delle nostre e delle latine, deduce
l’origine sua dal greco. Schola scrissero i latini e σχολή i greci, e
vollero significare riposo da fatica corporea, il quale dà opportunità di
ricreazione o di studio: così ci accadde già di ricordare la schola o
sedile in Pompei, ov’era l’orologio solare: così schola chiamavansi
quegli altri sedili in muratura ch’erano nelle terme, e via discorrendo.
Presto poi venne adoperato il vocabolo ad esprimere il luogo in cui i
maestri e i loro scolari si raccolgono per fine d’istruzione; nel qual
unico senso fu quindi ricevuto nell’idioma nostro.
Io, come dissi, dalle due scuole summentovate, di cui ci è attestata
da due iscrizioni l’esistenza in Pompei, nonchè dal ritrovamento di
ferri chirurgici, de’ quali verrò a intrattenere chi legge, partirò per
indagare l’indole dell’istruzione e della coltura intellettuale d’allora.
Senza di questo capitolo, crederei incompleto il quadro che mi sono
proposto di condurre delle condizioni di Roma e delle sue colonie,
del quale mi danno causa e pretesto le rovine di Pompei.
Sotto il portico orientale del Foro civile di questa esumata città, e che
già a suo luogo ho descritto, si è scoperta una vasta sala: nel fondo
di essa è nel mezzo una specie di nicchia; altre minori sono
distribuite tutte all’intorno, con porte agli angoli. Gau, scrittore, la cui
autorità ho più volte in addietro invocata, riconobbe in tutte queste
disposizioni, le disposizioni stesse delle antiche scuole d’Oriente. La
nicchia del fondo avrebbe, secondo lui e con tutta ragione di
probabilità, servito di cattedra al maestro; quelle all’ingiro spettavano
invece agli scolari, per deporvi abiti e libri. Siffatta supposizione fu
universalmente accolta e trovò il suo suggello di verità nella
iscrizione seguente, che stava scritta in caratteri rossi, oggi affatto
scomparsi, vicino alla porta, sull’angolo della casa:
C. CAPELLAM D. V. I. D. O. V. F. VERNA CVM DISCENT [217].