Trehalose Produced by A Novel Enzymatic Process
Trehalose Produced by A Novel Enzymatic Process
Under the "UK Novel Foods and Novel Food Ingredients (Amendment) Regulations 1999"
and the corresponding "Guidelines on the disclosure of information and confidential-
ity in respect of applications made to the ACNFP", this dossier and the pertinent
parts of the pivotal safety studies are to be made public. Certain information re-
lated to marketing and the production process is confidential and has been removed
from this version. However, it is contained in the original dossier and has been
given to the Committee for their consideration.
The animal studies which were commissioned by the applicant in order to fulfill the
toxicological requirements, were conducted with the approval and under the supervi-
sion of the competent Animal Welfare Committee.
Bioresco Ltd. Bundesstrasse 29 CH-4054 Basel Telephone ++41 61 273 77 00 Telefax ++41 61 273 77 03
e-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.bioresco.ch
CONTENTS
1. Introduction ........................................... 5
2. "Specifications of the NF" .............................. 8
2.1. Specifications ................................. 8
2.2. Physico-chemical properties ..................... 9
2.3. Other properties relevant to the use of treha-
lose as a food ingredient ....................... 9
2.3.1. Sweetness ............................. 9
2.3.2. Hygroscopicity ........................ 10
2.3.3. Chemical stability .................... 10
2.3.4. Thermal stability...................... 10
3. "Effect of the production process applied to the NF" .... 11
3.1. Novelty of the process .......................... 11
3.2. General description of the process .............. 12
3.3. Detailed description of the process ............. 13
3.3.1. Starch liquefaction .................... 13
3.3.2. Saccharification, production of trehalose 13
3.3.3. Purification ........................... 13
3.3.4. Concentration and crystallization ...... 13
3.4. Safety of raw material, chemicals, and enzymes
used in the process ............................. 14
3.5. Potential impurities resulting from the
production process .............................. 19
3.5.1. Impurities from raw material, process
chemicals and enzymes ................... 19
3.5.2. By-products from enzymatic saccharifi-
cation .................................. 20
3.5.3. Purification steps ...................... 21
4. "History of the organism used as the source of the NF" .. 23
5. "Anticipated intake / extent of use of the NF" .......... 24
5.1. Intended uses in food ........................... 24
5.2. Current food applications of trehalose in Japan . 26
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 2/79
5.3. Estimated daily intake .......................... 26
6. "Information from previous human exposure to the NF or
its source ............................................. 30
6.1. Occurrence in nature ............................ 30
6.1.1. Occurrence in plants .................... 30
6.1.2. Occurrence in animals ................... 31
6.2. Consumption of trehalose added to food in Japan . 32
6.3. Intake of high single doses in trehalose tole-
rance tests ..................................... 33
7. "Nutritional information on the NF" ..................... 34
8. "Microbiological information on the NF" ................. 35
9. "Toxicological information on the NF" ................... 36
9.1. General remarks ................................. 36
9.2. Metabolic studies on trehalose .................. 37
9.2.1. Digestion and absorption of ingested
trehalose ............................... 37
9.2.2. Metabolism of parenterally administered
trehalose ............................... 41
9.3. Toxicological studies ........................... 43
9.3.1. Acute toxicity .......................... 43
9.3.2. Short-term studies of toxicity .......... 44
9.3.3. Genotoxicity ............................ 47
9.3.4. Developmental toxicity .................. 48
9.3.5. Special studies ......................... 51
9.3.5.1. Ocular irritation ............ 51
9.4. Tolerance of trehalose in humans ................ 51
9.4.1. Intestinal tolerance in healthy volunteers 51
9.4.2. Impaired intestinal tolerance due to
intestinal trehalase deficiency.......... 53
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 3/79
FIGURES 1 – 3
TABLES 1 – 4
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 4/79
1. Introduction
1
Synonyms: α,α-trehalose, α-D-trehalose, D-(+)–trehalose, α-trehalose, D-trehalose, mycose
("mushrooms sugar"). Brand names: TrehaoseTM, TrehaTM (Hayashibara Co., Ltd.)
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 5/79
ramosus. One enzyme converts the terminal (reducing) maltosyl unit
of maltooligosaccharides (DP >3) to a trehalose unit. The other en-
zyme hydrolyzes the α-1,4 glycosidic bond adjacent to the trehalose
unit thereby liberating trehalose (Figure 2)2. In order to increase
the yield of the process, isoamylase from Pseudomonas amyloderamosa
and cyclodextrin glucosyltransferase (CGTase) from Bacillus stearo-
thermophilus are used as ancillary enzymes. None of the source mi-
croorganisms of these enzymes is genetically modified.
2
The biosynthesis of trehalose in Rhizobia and certain other microorganisms relies on
the same enzymatic steps (Kato, 1999; Streeter & Bhagwat, 1999).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 6/79
X. Information from previous human exposure to the NF or its
source
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 7/79
2. "Specifications of the NF"
2.1. Specifications
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 8/79
2.2. Physico-chemical properties
Solubility in water
2.3.1. Sweetness
3
Lammert et al., 1998. A slightly lower solubility was reported by Sugimoto, 1995 and
Miller et al., 1997.
4
Values of +177° to +199° have been reported in the literature (Birch, 1963; Koch & Koch,
1925).
5
Values of 203–216°C are given in the literature (Birch, 1965; Koch & Koch, 1925). More
recently, the existence of three different polymorphs of anhydrous trehalose with dif-
ferent melting points has been reported, namely trehalose-β, trehalose-α, and trehalose-
γ with m.p. 215, 125 and 120-130°C, respectively (Sussich et al., 1998).
6
Values of 94-100°C have been reported in the literature (Birch, 1963).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 9/79
other hand, the sweetness of trehalose has a longer persistence
than that of sucrose (Portmann & Birch, 1995).
2.3.2. Hygroscopicity
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 10/79
3. "Effect of the production process applied to the NF"
7
There exist three different isomers of trehalose: α,α-trehalose (trehalose) which is the
subject of the present application; α,β-trehalose (neo-trehalose); and β,β-trehalose (iso-
trehalose). The three isomers have distinctly different specific rotations and melting
points (Birch, 1963).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 11/79
3.2. General description of the process
8
Categorized as α-glucanotransferase in Japan. The systematic name is (1à4)-α-D-glucan
1-α-D-glucosylmutase (EC 5.4.99.15).
9
Categorized as α-amylase in Japan. The systematic name is 4-α-D [(1à4)-α-D-glucano]
trehalose glucanohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.141).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 12/79
3.3. Detailed description of the process
3.3.3. Purification
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 13/79
3.4. Safety of raw material, chemicals, and enzymes used in the
process
The applied cation and anion exchange resins comply with pertinent
US regulations [21 CFR § 173.25 (ion exchange resins)] and the
Council of Europe Resolution AP (97)1 (specifications are presented
in Annex 4).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 14/79
The MTSase (EC 5.4.99.15) and MTHase (EC 3.2.1.141), which are the
crucial enzymes for the enzymatic synthesis of trehalose, are ob-
tained from Arthrobacter ramosus (strain S34). The genus Arthrobac-
ter is widely distributed in nature. Bacteria of this genus are
predominant members of the soil microbiota (for taxonomic charac-
teristics see Kvasnikov et al., 1986; Masiak et al., 1991). A few
species of Arthrobacter have been identified in a small number of
clinical samples but in no instance was A. ramosus isolated (Funke
et al., 1996). Arthrobacter spp. is generally considered to be non-
pathogenic and belongs consequently to risk group 1 of the German
"Gentechnik-Sicherheitsverordnung" (GenTSV), i.e., Regulation on
the Safety of Gentechnology. Group 1 comprises microorganisms which
present no risk for humans and vertebrates. MTSase and MTHase are
produced by cultivating A. ramosus (strain S34) in a standard me-
dium containing food-grade maltose, food-grade mineral salts, a ni-
trogen source (peptone), and yeast extract. When the desired enzyme
activity has been reached in the fermentation broth, albumen lyso-
zyme is added in order to lyse the bacterial cells. The cells and
particles are then removed by membrane filtration (pore size 0.04
µm). The filtrate is purified by cross-flow ultra-filtration (cut-
off molecular weight of 10,000 daltons).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 15/79
purification of trehalose which removes proteinaceous, glycidic,
and ionic impurities almost quantitatively10, the use of MTSase and
MTHase as processing aids in the production of trehalose appears to
be acceptable even in the absence of specific toxicological studies
on these two enzymes (see Annex 3 for data demonstrating the ab-
sence of residual enzymatic activity in trehalose).
10
Analyses for protein of 5 different batches of trehalose using the Kjeldahl method gave
values of 7-8 mg protein/100 g trehalose. For comparison, the starch used as a starting
material has a protein content of <0.35%. The content of glycosidic impurities is de-
scribed in chapter 3.5.2. The content of inorganic substances, as measured by the
method for total ash, is not more than 50 mg/100 g trehalose (see chapter 3.5.1).
11
[This foot-note reports on details of the production process for which the applicant
claims confidentiality]
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 16/79
98, and TA 100, as well as in E. coli WP2 uvrA with and without
metabolic activation. At levels of up to 5000 µg/plate, the test
preparation was not toxic to the tester strains and was not muta-
genic (van Delft, 1999).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 17/79
treatment. Body weights did not differ between treatment groups and
controls. Six rats died during the study. In 4 cases, the death re-
sulted from a gavaging error (confirmed on autopsy). In the other
two cases (one male rat of the mid and high dose group each) the
cause of death could not be determined because of cannibalism
and/or autolysis. Food intake, hematological parameters, clinico-
chemical parameters, semi-quantitative urinalysis, organ weights at
termination, and histopathological examination of organs and tissue
did not reveal changes that could be attributed to the treatment.
It was concluded the high-dose level tested (10 ml/kg bw) was a no-
observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) (Lina, 1999).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 18/79
Glucoamylase (EC 3.2.1.3) from Aspergillus niger and α-amylase (EC
3.2.1.1) from Bacillus subtilis are used in the last step of the
trehalose production process to degrade remaining oligosaccharides
and maltose. The safety of these enzymes and source organisms has
been evaluated by JECFA (WHO, 1972, 1988, 1991b) and tentative or
final specifications have been laid down (FAO, 1992a, 1993). In the
US, both enzymes are authorized for the treatment of wine (27 CFR §
24.246).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 19/79
The different enzyme preparations contain residues of the fermenta-
tion broth and by-products of the microbial metabolism. All ingre-
dients of the fermentation broth are ordinary nutritional sub-
stances (carbohydrates, peptides, minerals). The bacterial fermen-
tation of the carbohydrates which are added as a carbon source,
yields typically short chain fatty acids. Toxic by-products are not
known to be produced by the employed microorganisms. All substances
carrying cationic or anionic functional groups are expected to be
removed by the de-ionization step using ion-exchange resins. An ad-
ditional purification is obtained by the treatment with activated
carbon. Any remaining organic impurities are likely to be removed
during the crystallization of trehalose. Inorganic residues would
be detected by the test for total ash.
12
The physicochemical properties of glucosyltrehalose have been determined. The LD50 of
this trisaccharide is > 50 g/kg bw in mice (Tabuchi et al., 1999). An enzyme prepara-
tion from rat small intestine hydrolyzed the substance to glucose and trehalose (Kuri-
moto et al., 1997b; Mandai et al., 1999).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 20/79
α-D-isomaltosyl- α-D-glucoside13. In a trehalose batch with a purity
of 99.1% (as determined by HPLC) these three by-products occurred
at levels of 0.5, 0.3 and 0.1%, respectively. Other mono-, di- and
oligosaccharides were not detected.
treatment with activated carbon will also remove the main part of
other organic, non-ionic impurities.
13
α-Isomaltosyl-α-D-glucoside is digested by an enzyme preparation from rat small intes-
tine. Non-digested product is fermented by intestinal bacteria (e.g., Bifidobacteria)
(Kurimoto et al., 1997a).
14
Five batches of trehalose were analyzed for residual enzymatic activity of α-amylase,
CGTase, MTSase, isoamylase, and glucoamylase using ELISA assays (Nagaoka et al., 1997).
(The enzymes used for the immunization were the ones used in trehalose production and
had an identical purity). No enzymatic activity was detected (limit of detection 1 mU/g
trehalose for all enzymes except MTSase (10 mU/g trehalose) (Annex 4).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 21/79
It is unlikely that microorganisms could be carried into the proc-
ess (mainly from the raw material) and survive the production proc-
ess which involves several heat treatment steps. Any surviving mi-
croorganisms would be detected in the tests for total (aerobic)
plate counts, E. coli, Salmonella, and yeast and molds.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 22/79
4. "History of the organism used as the source of the NF"
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 23/79
5. "Anticipated intake / extent of use of the NF"
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 24/79
serts, and premium ice creams. Trehalose appears to have a stabiliz-
ing effect not only during dehydration but also during the rehydra-
tion of susceptible molecules. Incorporated in instant noodles or
precooked rice, it accelerates the rehydration of the product.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 25/79
5.2. Current food applications of trehalose in Japan
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 26/79
an EDI calculation on basis of US data was considered adequate be-
cause the consumption of processed food is rather higher in the US
than in the EU and because European food intake data are not avail-
able for conducting EDI calculations of a similar degree of refine-
ment. This calculation model relies on food consumption data from
the 1994-96 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (94-96
CSFII) in which data were collected from a representative sample of
individuals residing in households in the US (approximately 15,000
individuals). Each individual was surveyed for two non-consecutive
days using 24-hour recall interviews. The foods consumed were coded
according to a system which contains about 6,000 different catego-
ries.
For the purpose of the present EDI calculation it was assumed that
each food (or food component) which may contain trehalose, indeed
contained trehalose at the highest, feasible concentration (as
specified in Table 1). Where trehalose was used in a component of
the food (e.g., in fruit-fillings), the intake of that component
was calculated from data on food composition.
The EDI of trehalose was calculated for each food category in which
trehalose may be used, and for all these food categories combined
(except for chewing gum for which such data are not available).
Mean and 90th percentile intakes were calculated on per-user basis
for the following age groups: children 2-12 years of age; teenagers
13-19 years of age; and the adult U.S. population 20+ years of age.
"Users" were defined as individuals who consumed food in the par-
ticular category on at least one occasion. Since food intake was
recorded by time of day and by eating occasion [breakfast, brunch,
lunch, dinner, supper, snack, and other (extended) eating occa-
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 27/79
sion], the intake of trehalose could be calculated per eating occa-
sion.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 28/79
parameter than the total daily intake from all dietary sources com-
bined. Considering the different anticipated uses of trehalose (as
described in chapter 5.1), it becomes apparent that the intake of
trehalose is not concentrated to certain eating occasions (such as
main meals) but is spread evenly over the day by the mere nature of
the products in which it is used. This is also reflected by the data
on estimated daily intakes. The figures shown in Table 2 demonstrate
that the mean and 90th percentile intake per eating occasion do not
exceed 8.1 and 18.6 g, respectively, in any age group. A comparison
between the intakes from the various food categories and the total
intake from all sources demonstrates that many uses are mutually ex-
clusive. In other words, a consumer of a sponge cake is unlikely to
eat a fruit pie at the same eating occasion. Consequently, trehalose
intakes per eating occasion are similar to the intake from one spe-
cific food category in a given age group (Annex 6).
Estimated intakes per eating occasion are far below the 50-g intake
which is typically used in trehalose loading tests and which is gen-
erally well tolerated (Bolte et al., 1973). The intakes per eating
occasion are also below the threshold dose for abdominal effects in
particularly sensitive subjects [>30 g per eating occasion (Oku &
Okazaki, 1998)]. Adverse gastrointestinal side-effects from the in-
tended uses of trehalose are, therefore, not to be expected. Since
in some applications trehalose may substitute for polyols, the total
intake of low-digestible carbohydrates could even slightly decrease.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 29/79
6. "Information from previous human exposure to the NF or its
source"
15
Nicolaus et al., 1988; Stjernholm, 1958 cited in Birch, 1963; Streeter & Bhagwat, 1999.
16
Koch & Koch, 1925; Oku et al., 1998.
17
Elbein, 1974; Thevelein, 1984; Oku et al., 1998.
18
Myrbäck, 1949; Elander & Myrbäck, 1949 cited in Birch, 1963; Lindberg, 1955 cited in
Birch, 1963.
19
Oesch & Meier, 1967 cited in Elbein, 1974; Goddijn & Smeekens, 1998; Oku et al., 1998;
Ghasempour et al., 1998; Müller et al., 1999.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 30/79
from other adverse environmental conditions (e.g., heat shock,
toxic levels of ethanol, osmostress) (Singer & Lindquist, 1998a,
b). In addition, trehalose may serve as reserve carbohydrate during
periods of carbon starvation (Silljé et al., 1999).
20
Myrbäck & Örtenblad, 1936 cited in Birch, 1963; Steiner & Cori, 1935; Stewart et al.,
1950.
21
Oku et al., 1998.
22
Mendes et al., 1998.
23
Behm, 1997.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 31/79
americanus) and crabs (Carcinus macenus) contains trehalose at con-
centrations of 2.5 and 1.5 mg/100ml, respectively.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 32/79
6.3. Intake of high single doses in trehalose tolerance tests
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 33/79
7. "Nutritional information on the NF"
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 34/79
8. "Microbiological information on the NF"
The enzymes which are used in the novel production process of tre-
halose, are obtained from non-genetically modified strains of Ar-
throbacter ramosus, Pseudomonas amyloderamosa, Bacillus stearother-
mophilus, Aspergillus niger, and Bacillus subtilis.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 35/79
9. "Toxicological information on the NF"
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 36/79
9.2. Metabolic studies on trehalose
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 37/79
A very small fraction of the healthy human population exhibits a
primary (hereditary) or secondary (acquired) trehalase deficiency
(see chapter 9.4.2). People with this condition may experience in-
testinal side-effects (flatulence, laxation) after the ingestion of
excessive amounts of trehalose, like lactase-deficient people after
the intake of excessive amounts of lactose. In this regard it is
noteworthy, however, that the incidence of lactase deficiency is
higher than that of trehalase deficiency (Gudmand-Høyer & Skovbjerg,
1996).
24
Since trehalose appears to have a higher hydrated volume than other sugars, the frac-
tional absorption by passive diffusion may actually be lower for trehalose than for
other disaccharides (Sola-Penna & Meyer-Fernandes, 1998).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 38/79
In an early study on the metabolism of different rare sugars, groups
of fasted rats received about 0.5 g glucose, trehalose, and other
sugars by gavage. An additional group served as control. The animals
were killed 8-9 hours after dosing and liver glycogen was deter-
mined. In comparison to the untreated controls, the average liver
glycogen content was increased after trehalose ingestion suggesting
that trehalose was efficiently converted to glucose (Clarke et al.,
1939).
In the context of an acute toxicity test, four male Beagle dogs re-
ceived trehalose per os (5 g/kg bw). Blood and urine were collected
before and in regular intervals after dosing for analysis of serum
glucose and trehalose. Serum glucose increased markedly reaching
maximum levels after 1 hour. Urinary glucose levels increased tran-
siently above baseline levels (presumably due to the hydrolysis of
some absorbed trehalose in the kidney). Urinary trehalose was not
detected (Atkinson & Thomas, 1994c)25.
25
Similar measurements were made in the context of acute toxicity studies in mice and
rats. However, the number of urine samples available for analysis was too small to ob-
tain meaningful results (Atkinson & Thomas, 1994a, b).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 39/79
Using an identical experimental protocol, the trehalose absorption
was studied in 9 uremic patients suffering from chronic renal insuf-
ficiency. The absorption of trehalose relative to that of glucose
was 0.83 + 0.5 (Pointner et al., 1974).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 40/79
9.2.2. Metabolism of parenterally administered trehalose
Rats, guinea pigs and rabbits were given trehalose at a dose of 0.5
or 1 g/kg bw by intravenous injection. In rats, about 87% (range 75-
98%) of the administered dose was recovered from the urine indicat-
ing that trehalase activity in the liver and kidneys was low or ab-
sent. In the guinea pigs and rabbits, only 7-9% of the dose were ex-
26
Under physiological conditions, small amounts of trehalase are excreted with the human
urine (Maruhn et al., 1976). Increased levels of urinary trehalase are indicative of
proximal tubular damage (Sasai-Takedatsu et al., 1996).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 41/79
creted with the urine. Examination of the trehalose levels drawn
from the renal artery and vein of rabbits indicated that trehalose
was hydrolyzed efficiently in the kidneys (Demelier et al., 1975).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 42/79
tabolized more rapidly and more completely than infused maltose at
the applied infusion rate. The better utilization of trehalose was
confirmed in an experiment with infusion of trehalose and maltose to
alloxan-diabetic rabbits. In a further experiment, the continuous
infusion of trehalose or glucose (supplemented with amino acids) for
5 days at a rate of 8.23 g/kg bw/d was not associated with any signs
of toxicity or adverse effects on serum biochemical parameters of
male rabbits (Sato et al., 1999).
In the context of an acute toxicity test, four male Beagle dogs re-
ceived trehalose by intravenous injection (1 g/kg bw). Blood and
urine were collected before and in regular intervals after dosing
for analysis of serum glucose and trehalose. Serum glucose raised
slightly reaching highest values after about 30-60 minutes of dos-
ing. Urinary glucose was increased markedly probably reflecting hy-
drolysis of trehalose by renal trehalose in the proximal tubuli. The
trehalose concentration in the urine 5 min after dosing was markedly
higher than that found in the plasma which suggests that trehalose
is rapidly cleared by the kidneys (Atkinson & Thomas, 1994c).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 43/79
In the rodent studies conducted by the Frederick Research Center,
groups of 5 animals of each sex were tested at one dose level (i.v.,
1 g/kg bw; p.o., 5 g/kg bw) or served as controls. In the dog study
conducted by the same contract institute, 4 male Beagles received a
single i.v. dose of 1 g/kg bw, followed 6 days later by an oral dose
of 5 g/kg bw. There were no mortalities due to the trehalose treat-
ments in any species. Signs of systemic toxicity were not observed.
Diarrhoea did not occur in response to the oral administration of
trehalose. Body weight gains were not impaired by the treatment dur-
ing the 7-day (dogs) or 14-day (rodents) post-treatment period (At-
kinson & Thomas, 1994 a, b, c).
Mice
Groups of ten CD-1 mice of each sex were given trehalose at doses of
1 g/kg bw/d by intravenous injection, 5 g/kg bw/d by gavage, or 2.5
g/kg bw/d by subcutaneous injection for 14 consecutive days. An ad-
ditional group (control group) received sterile saline (same dose
volume as the oral treatment group). Body weights, weight gains, and
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 44/79
food consumption did not differ between the treatment groups over
the 2-week treatment period. One female of the i.v. group died after
dosing on day 6 (necropsy findings were unremarkable). No clinical
signs of toxicity were seen throughout the study. Mild necrosis
and/or local irritation of the tail in some animals of the i.v.
group was ascribed to the repeated administration of a hypertonic
solution. Blood samples were collected at termination for analysis
of standard hematological and biochemical parameters (5 animals/sex
for each set of parameters). The white blood cell counts were below
control levels in males but not females of the p.o. and s.c. groups.
Differences between treated groups and controls of some biochemical
parameters were quantitatively small and also limited to one sex
(males). Macroscopic and histopathological examination of all tis-
sues of p.o. treated mice did not reveal any changes that could be
attributed to the exposure to trehalose (Atkinson & Thomas, 1994d).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 45/79
scopic abnormalities of the low and mid-dose group) were examined
microscopically for pathological changes.
There were four deaths during the study (1 spontaneous death in the
control group, 1 male of the high-dose group killed in extremis in
week 12, and two deaths in connection with blood sampling). The ani-
mal of the high-dose group exhibited severe pyelonephritis on histo-
pathologic examination which was considered not to be related to the
treatment. Food consumption and body weight gains were slightly be-
low controls in males of the mid- and high-dose groups. Treatment
related clinical signs were not observed. Ophthalmoscopic examina-
tion revealed no treatment-related effects. Hematological parameters
remained unaffected by the treatment. Plasma glucose levels tended
to be slightly increased in males and females of the high dose group
(significant in females in week 5 and 9). In the females, plasma
phosphate was increased at the same time. In week 13, plasma potas-
sium was decreased in a dose-related manner in males and females,
reaching statistical significance in the high-dose group. However,
the observed values were still well within the limits of historical
controls. Significant changes of a few other parameters were consid-
ered coincidental since they occurred only at one occasion and/or in
one sex. Urinary parameters did not reveal changes that could be at-
tributed to the treatment. Organ weights were unaffected by the
treatment. There were no macroscopic or microscopic findings in or-
gans and tissues which were considered to be related to the treat-
ment. The high-dose level [equivalent to 7.3 (males) and 9.3 (fe-
males) g/kg bw/d] was considered to be tolerated without toxicologi-
cal effects (Schmid et al., 1998).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 46/79
Dogs
Groups of three male and three female Beagle dogs received trehalose
at doses of 1 g/kg bw/d by intravenous injection in the cephalic
vein, 5 g/kg/d by oral capsule, or 0.25 g/kg/d by subcutaneous in-
jection for 14 consecutive days. A control group was given empty
capsules at the same number of capsules/kg body weight as those
treated with the test article. All animals survived till the end of
the study. Body weights and food consumption did not differ between
controls and the different treatment groups. All dogs of the p.o.
group experienced diarrhoea on some days of the study (range: 4-8
days out of 14 days). Vomiting was observed in a few animals of the
control, p.o. and s.c. groups. Measurement of serum glucose after
dosing at the last treatment day revealed significant transient in-
creases in i.v. and p.o. dosed dogs. Analysis of blood samples col-
lected at termination did not reveal toxicologically relevant
changes of hematological or biochemical parameters. Macroscopic ex-
amination at necropsy and microscopic examination of standard organs
and tissue did not reveal changes which could be attributed to the
treatment. It was concluded that trehalose was not toxic at the ap-
plied doses (Atkinson & Thomas, 1994e).
9.3.3. Genotoxicity
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 47/79
9.3.4. Developmental toxicity
Rats
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 48/79
In a 2-geneneration reproductive toxicity study, groups of Wistar
rats (Crl:(WI)WU BR) (28 rats/sex/group) were administered a diet
containing trehalose (purity 99%) at concentrations of 0, 2.5, 5 or
10%. After a period of 10 weeks (pre-mating period), each female was
caged with one male of the same treatment group until pregnancy oc-
curred. Upon evidence of copulation, the females were housed indi-
vidually. Trehalose treatment was continued during pregnancy and
lactation. On day 4 after delivery, the litters were culled to 8
pups. After weaning, 28 males and 28 females were selected at random
from as many litters as possible in each group and raised to matur-
ity while continuing the trehalose treatment. These animals (F1 gen-
eration) were then used to rear the next generation (F2 generation)
avoiding the mating of siblings and following an identical procedure
as for the F0 generation. The F0 and F1 males and females were killed
and necropsied after weaning of their litters. There were no clini-
cal signs or changes in behavior due to treatment. Some differences
between controls and treatment groups with regard to body weights
and food intake showed no consistent association with the dose or
duration of the treatment. In the high-dose group, males of the F0
and F1 generation consumed between 4.9-12.4 g trehalose per kg body
weight per day during the pre-mating period. F0 and F1 females of the
high-dose group consumed 5.9-11.7 g/kg bw/d during the same period.
During the gestation and lactation period, their trehalose intake
ranged from 4.4-7.2 and 10.1-19.9 g/kg bw/d, respectively. No ef-
fects of the trehalose treatment were observed on standard parame-
ters of reproductive performance. The number of pups delivered, pup
mortality, body weights and growth did not differ between treated
groups and controls. No treatment-related macroscopic changes were
observed at autopsy. Microscopic examination of reproductive organs
and accessory glands, as well as the pituitary and spleen did not
reveal any changes that could be attributed to the treatment. It was
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 49/79
concluded that ingestion of trehalose at dietary concentrations of
up to 10% had no adverse effects on reproduction and development of
the pups (Wolterbeek & Waalkens-Berendsen, 1999a).
Rabbits
Body weights, weight gains and food consumption did not differ be-
tween controls and treated groups. However, there were a few animals
in each of the three dose groups, which consumed only small amounts
of food during the third and/or fourth week of pregnancy. One of
these animals was killed in extremis, another died spontaneously
(both belonging to the high-dose group). At necropsy, a hairball was
found in the stomach of both animals. The trehalose intake ranged
from 0.21-0.77, 0.48-1.34, and 1.04-2.82 g/kg bw/d for the low-,
mid- and high-dose groups, respectively. Necropsy on the does showed
no adverse effects that could be related to the treatment. The num-
ber of viable litters, the number of corpora lutea, and the mean
number of implantation sites were similar in all groups. One early
delivery occurred in the high-dose. Fetal length and body weight
were similar in all groups. Examination of the fetuses revealed no
treatment-related increase in gross, skeletal, or visceral abnor-
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 50/79
malities. Under the conditions of this assay, trehalose was not
teratogenic and did not induce and maternal or developmental toxic-
ity (Wolterbeek & Waalkens-Berendsen, 1999b).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 51/79
Clinical signs of intolerance were not observed in any of 27 infants
and children (10 healthy and 17 with malabsorption) after ingestion
of a bolus trehalose dose of 2 g/kg bw (Fiehring et al., 1976). This
observation is consistent with fact that the intestinal trehalase
activity is fully developed already during the first year of life
(Niessen et al., 1975).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 52/79
of the Caucasians and none of the Blacks appeared to be affected.
Blood glucose levels rose to a significantly smaller degree in Japa-
nese subjects than in Caucasians or Black. This result suggests that
the rate of trehalose digestion is lower in Japanese people than in
Caucasians or Black (Ushijima et al., 1995).
27
A generalized deficiency of disaccharidases (including trehalase) occurs not infrequently
in patients who suffer from various disorders of the digestive tract including Morbus
Crohn, Colitis ulcerosa, Sprue, etc. (Mališ et al., 1972; Bolte et al., 1973; Berg et al.,
1973; Lutkic et al., 1985; Rodeck & Dominick, 1983; Gupta et al., 1999). The reason is
that in these subjects the integrity of the intestinal mucosa is impaired generally.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 53/79
A second, similar case was reported two years later from a clinic in
Czechoslovakia (Madzarovová-Nohejlova, 1973). In this case, the ab-
sence of intestinal trehalase could be confirmed in a biopsy taken
from the upper jejunum. In addition, the patient's father was also
found to be trehalase-deficient.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 54/79
ter trehalose intake did not differ between the subjects with and
without intestinal symptoms (Arola et al., 1999). In the absence of
a double-blind, placebo-controlled design it cannot be excluded that
an over-reporting of intestinal side effects in the mushroom intol-
erant group has contributed to the seemingly more frequent occur-
rence of trehalose maldigestion.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 55/79
in chapter 9.4.1, more than 100 healthy subjects, including chil-
dren, ingested trehalose at doses of up to 25-30 g without the oc-
currence of gastrointestinal symptoms (Bolte et al., 1973; Arola et
al., 1999; Heine et al., 1996; Pointner et al., 1974; Fiehring et
al., 1976).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 56/79
10. Summary
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 57/79
accepted for use in foods (except infant formulae and follow-up
milks) in April 1991 (MAFF, 1991; ACNFP, 1990, 1991).
Trehalose has been used in foods in Japan (since 1995), South Korea
and Taiwan. It is used for moisture retention, lower sweetness (in
comparison to sucrose), and advantageous properties during drying,
freezing and dehydration. Japanese foods formulated with trehalose
include certain types of confectionery, cakes, cookies, fruit pu-
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 58/79
rees, desserts, health or sport drinks, as well as rice and noodles.
The intake of trehalose with these foods varies between 1-10 g per
serving. In a few cases (e.g., candies, certain Japanese confection-
ery) it may reach 20 g per serving. It is estimated that trehalose
will be used in Western foods for the same technological reasons but
that the type of foods may differ somewhat. Calculation of the in-
takes which may result from the anticipated uses in Western food in-
dicates that not more than 8.1 g trehalose will be consumed per eat-
ing occasion by the average user of such products (18.6 g by the 90th
percentile consumer). The estimated average daily intake of treha-
lose from all its uses combined is less than 8 g.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 59/79
metabolism of trehalose, the high purity of the substance, and the
available toxicological data, it would appear that the safety as-
sessment can be concluded even in the absence of chronic studies.
28
A higher incidence may be found in subjects who suffer from intestinal disease and in
Eskimos. However, these people are likely to be aware of their intolerance to sweet
foods because they exhibit a more general disaccharidase deficiency, i.e., they are
also deficient in lactase and sucrase/isomaltase.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 60/79
11. REFERENCES
Arola H., Koivula T., Karvonen A.-L., Jokela H., Ahola T. and
Isokoski M. (1999). Low trehalase activity is associated with
abdominal symptoms caused by edible mushrooms. Scand. J. Gas-
troenterol. 34: 898-903.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 61/79
Atkinson J.E. and Thomas B.J. (1994b). An acute toxicity study of
trehalose in the albino rat (Study No. 435), Unpublished report
of Frederick Research Centre, Frederick (MD) for Quadrant Hold-
ings, Cambridge, UK.
Becker A., Schlöder P., Steele J.E. and Wegener G. (1996). The
regulation of trehalose metabolism in insects. Experientia 52:
433-439.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 62/79
Berg N.O., Dahlqvist A., Lindberg T. and Nordén Å. (1973). Correla-
tion between morphological alterations and enzyme activities in
the mucosa of the small intestine. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 8:
703-712.
Bergoz R., Bolte J.P. and Meyer zum Bueschenfelde K.-H. (1973).
Trehalose tolerance test. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 8: 657-663.
Bolte J.P., Schönhage F., Förster E., Knolle J. and Meyer zum
Büschenfelde K.H. (1973). Zur diagnostischen Bedeutung der Tre-
halose-Belastung bei Malassimilationssyndromen. Dtsch. med.
Wschr. 98: 1358-1362.
Brunet C., Lamare S. and Legoy M-D. (1998). Studies of specific cy-
clodextrin production starting from pure maltooligosaccharides
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 63/79
using Thermoanaerobacter sp. cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase.
Biocatalysis and Biotransformation 16: 317-327.
Cerda J.J., Preiser H. and Crane R.K. (1972). Brush border enzymes
and malabsorption: elevated disaccharides in chronic pancreatic
insufficiency with diabetes mellitus. Gastroenterol. 62: 841.
Colaço C., Sen S., Thangavelu M., Pinder S. and Roser B. (1992).
Extraordinary stability of enzymes dried in trehalose: simpli-
fied molecular biology. Bio/Technol. 10: 1007-1010.
Colaço C.A.L.S., Smith C.J.S., Sen S., Roser D.H., Newman Y., Ring
S. and Roser B.J. (1994). Chapter 14. Chemistry of protein sta-
bilization by trehalose. In: "Formulation and Delivery of Pro-
teins and Peptide", American Chemical Society, p. 222-240.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 64/79
Crowe J.H., Crowe L.M., Carpenter J.F., Rudolph A.S., Aurell Wis-
trom C., Spargo B.J. and Anchordoguy T.J. (1988). Interactions
of sugars with membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 947: 367-384.
Funke G., Hutson R.A., Bernard K.A., Pfyffer G.E., Wauters G. and
Collins M.D. (1996). Isolation of Arthrobacter spp. from clini-
cal specimens and description of Arthrobacter cumminsii sp.
nov. and Arthrobacter woluwensis sp. nov. J. Clin. Microbiol.
34 (10): 2356-2363.
Green J.L. and Angell C.A. (1989). Phase relations and vitrifica-
tion in saccharide-water solutions and the trehalose anomaly.
J. Phys. Chem. 93: 2880-2882.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 66/79
Gupta S.K., Chong S.K.F. and Fitzgerald J.F. (1999). Disaccharidase
activities in children: normal values and comparison based on
symptoms and histologic changes. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol.
Nutr. 28: 246-251.
Heine W., Mohr Ch. and Münch Ch. (1996). Zuckerverbindungen als
Substrate für Wasserstoff-Atemgasteste: Korrelationen zur Do-
sis, orozökalen Transitzeit, Mikroflora und zu Nebenwirkungen.
Pädiatr. Grenzgeb. 34: 481-490.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 67/79
Kato M. (1999). Trehalose production with a new enzymatic system
from Sulfolobus solfataricus KM1. J. Mol. Catalysis B: Enzy-
matic 6: 223-233.
Koch E.M. and Koch F.C. (1925). The presence of trehalose in yeast.
Science 61 (1587): 570-572.
Kurimoto M., Nishimoto T., Nakada T., Chaen H., Fukuda S. and
Tsujisaka Y. (1997a). Synthesis by an α-glucosidase of
glycosyl-trehalose with an isomaltosyl residue. Biosci.
Biotech. Biochem. 61 (4): 699-703.
Kurimoto M., Tabuchi A., Mandai T., Shibuya T., Chaen H., Fukuda
S., Sugimoto T. and Tsujisaka Y. (1997b). Synthesis of
glycosyl-trehalose by cyclomaltodextrin glucanotransferase
through the transglycosylation reaction. Biosci. Biotech.
Biochem. 61 (7): 1146-1149.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 68/79
Lindley M.G. (eds.), Applied Science Publishers Ltd., London,
p. 84-106.
Lammert A.M., Schmidt S.J. and Day G.A. (1998). Water activity and
solubility of trehalose. Food Chem. 61 (1/2): 139-144.
Leslie S.B., Israeli E., Lighthart B., Crowe J.H. and Crowe L.M.
(1995). Trehalose and sucrose protect both membranes and
proteins in intact bacteria during drying. Appl. Environm.
Microbiol. 61 (10): 3592-3597.
LutkiC A., Šir S., Varga l., Primer S. and Turk R. (1985). Disac-
charidases in jejunal mucosa of children. Acta Pharm. Jugosl.
35: 61-69.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 69/79
Maestracci D. (1976). Enzymic solubilization of the human intesti-
nal brush border membrane enzymes. Biochim. Biophy. Acta 433:
469-481.
Maruhn D., Fuchs I., Mues G. and Bock K. D. (1976). Normal limits
of urinary excretion of eleven enzymes. Clin. Chem. 22 (10):
1567-1574.
Maruta K., Hattori K., Nakada T., Kubota M., Sugimoto T. and
Kurimoto M. (1996). Cloning and sequencing of trehalose
biosynthesis genes from Arthrobacter sp. Q36. Biochim. Biophys.
Acta 1289: 10-13.
Maruta K., Nakada T., Kubota M., Chaen H., Sugimoto T., Kurimoto
M., Tsujisaka Y. (1995). Formation of trehalose from
maltooligosaccharides by a novel enzymatic system. Biosci.
Biotechnol. Biochem. 59: 1829-1834.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 70/79
Mc Rae L.A. (1995). Trehalose crystals. Acute oral toxicity to the
rat. Unpublished report of Huntingdon Research Centre Ltd.,
Huntingdon U.K. for Hayashibara Biochemical Laboratories Inc.,
Okayama-ken, Japan.
Morimoto H., Noro H. and Ohtaki H. (1979 a). Acute toxicity test of
Pseudomonas amyloderamosa (wet cells). Unpublished report Nr.
12110175-1 of Japan Food Research Laboratories, Tokyo, Japan,
for Hayashibara Co., Ltd., Okayama-ken, Japan.
Morimoto H., Noro H. and Ohtaki H. (1979 b). Acute toxicity test of
Pseudomonas amyloderamosa (culture filtrate). Unpublished
report Nr. 12110175-2 of Japan Food Research Laboratories,
Tokyo, Japan, for Hayashibara Co., Ltd., Okayama-ken, Japan.
Morimoto H., Noro H. and Ohtaki H. (1979 c). Acute toxicity test of
isoamylase (of Pseudomonas amyloderamosa origin). Unpublished
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 71/79
report Nr. 12110175-3 of Japan Food Research Laboratories,
Tokyo, Japan, for Hayashibara Co., Ltd., Okayama-ken, Japan.
Murray I.A., Coupland K., Smith J.A., Ansell I.D. and Long R.G.
(2000). Intestinal trehalase activity in a UK population: es-
tablishing a normal range and the effect of disease. Br. J.
Nutr. 83: 241-245.
Nakada T., Maruta K., Mitsuzumi H., Kubota M., Chaen H., Sugimoto
T., Kurimoto M. and Tsujisaka Y. (1995). Purification and char-
acterization of a novel enzyme, maltooligosyl trehalose treha-
lohydrolase, from Arthrobacter sp. Q36. Biosci. Biotech. Bio-
chem. 59 (12): 2215-2218.
Nakada T., Maruta K., Tzusaki K., Kubota M., Chaen H., Sugimoto T.,
Kurimoto M. and Tsujisaka Y. (1995). Purification and proper-
ties of a novel enzyme, maltooligosyl trehalose synthase, from
Arthrobacter sp. Q36. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 59 (12): 2210-
2214.
Nicolaus B., Gambacorta A., Basso A.L., Riccio R., De Rosa M. and
Grant W.D. (1988). Trehalose in Archaebacteria. System. Appl.
Microbiol. 10: 215-217.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 72/79
Niederst C. and Dauça M. (1985). Activités des hydrolases rénales
au cours du développement pré- et post-natal de la souris. Can.
J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 63: 731-734.
Oku K., Sawatani I., Chaen H., Fukuda S. and Kurimoto M. (1998).
Trehalose content in foods. Nippon Shokuhin Kagaku Kogaku Kai-
shi 45 (6): 381-384.
Pointner H., Flegel U., Bayer P.M. and Schmidt P. (1974). Anwendung
des Trehalose-Toleranztests zur Untersuchung der Dünndarmre-
sorption bei Patienten unter chronischer Hämodialyse. Wiener
Klin. Wschr. 22: 691-693.
Portmann M.O. and Birch G. (1995). Sweet taste and solution proper-
ties of α,α-trehalose. J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 69: 275-281.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 73/79
Riby J., Sunshine S. and Kretchmer N. (1990). Renal trehalase:
Function and development. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 95A (1): 95-
99.
Sato S., Okamoto K., Minami R., Kohri H. and Yamamoto S. (1999).
Trehalose can be as a parenteral saccharide source in rabbits.
J. Nutr. 129: 158-164.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 74/79
ability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 181 (2):
396-400.
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 75/79
Sussich F., Urbani R., Princivalle F. and Cesàro A. (1998). Poly-
morphic amorphous and crystalline forms of trehalose. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 120: 7893-7899.
Van Elburg R.M., Uil J.J., Kokke F.T.M., Mulder A.M., van de Broek
W.G.M., Mulder C.J.J. and Heymans H.S.A. (1995). Repeatabil-
ity of the sugar-absorption test, using lactulose and manni-
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 76/79
tol, for measuring intestinal permeability for sugars. J. Pe-
diatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 20: 184-188.
Vázquez C., Escobar H., Polanco I., Codoceo R. and Vitoria J.C.
(1975). Malabsorción de los hidratos de carbono en el niño.
An. Esp. Pediat. 8: 105-194.
Welsh J.D., Poley J.R., Bhatia M. and Stevenson D.E. (1978). Intes-
tinal disaccharidase activities in relation to age, race, and
mucosal damage. Gastroenterol. 75: 847-855.
WHO (1972). WHO Technical Report Series 488, 9-13 (Comments on sub-
stances on the Agenda: Enzymes).
WHO (1987). WHO Food Additives Series 20: 3-7 (Carbohydrase (α-
amylase) from Bacillus lichenformis).
WHO (1988). WHO Food Additives Series 22: 11-14 (Enzymes derived
from Aspergillus niger).
WHO (1998). WHO Food Additives Series 40: 91-100 (Maltogenic amy-
lase).
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 78/79
Wyatt G.R. and Kalf G.F. (1957). The chemistry of insect hemolymph.
II. Trehalose and other carbohydrates. J. Gen. Physiol. 40:
833-847
TREHALOSE_EU_MANU1_PUBLIC_120500.doc 79/79
Table 1: Applications of trehalose and maximum levels of use
[The data contained in this table are related to marketing know-how for which the
applicant claims confidentiality]
TREHALOSE_EU_PUBLIC_TABLE_1_120500.xls
Table 2 Estimated intake of trehalose from the combined proposed
uses in food1)
1
Based on USDA CSFII 1994-96 data, chewing gum intake not included
2
Lunch combines reported consumption at both lunch and brunch
3
Dinner combines reported consumption at both dinner and supper
TREHALOSE_EU_PUBLIC_TABLE_2_120500.xls
Table 3: Acute toxicity of trehalose
Mouse Male and female oral >5 Atkinson & Thomas (1994 a)
Male and female intravenous >1 Atkinson & Thomas (1994 a)
TREHALOSE_EU_PUBLIC_TABLE_3_120500.xls
Table 4 : Results of assays for the genotoxicity of trehalose
a
With and without exogenous metabolic activation (MA)
b
Two assays were conducted: treatment times 3 h (with and without MA); 3 h (with MA) and 21 h (without MA).
Harvest times, 21 and 45 h
c
Harvest times, 24 and 48 h
TREHALOSE_EU_PUBLIC_TABLE_4_120500.xls
TREHALOSE
TREHALOSE_ACNFP_FIG_1_150200.doc
Figure 2: Action of trehalose producing enzymes
4 1 4 1 4 1 4 1
Maltooligosaccharide
4 1 4 1 4 1
MTSase
(EC 5.4.99.15)
n
4 1 4 1
1
MTHase
(EC 3.2.1.141)
n
1
Glucose (n=0), maltose (n=1)
or maltooligosaccharide (n>2) TREHALOSE
TREHALOSE_EU_PUBLIC_FIG_2_120500.ppt
Figure 3: Flow chart of trehalose production
Starch
Slurry prepartion
Isoamylase
Saccharification MTSase
MTHase
Decoloration CGTase
Deionization Glucoamylase
α-amylase
Concentration
First Crystallization
Centrifugation
Concentration
Second Crystallization
Centrifugation
Chromatographic Separation
Concentration Concentration
TREHALOSE
TREHALOSE_EU_PUBLIC_FIG_ 3_120500.xls
Annex 1
TREHALOSE_EU_PUBLIC_ANNEX1_COVERSHEET_MANU1_120500.doc
Company: Bioresco Product: Trehalose
Select OK to continue.
Company: Bioresco Product: Trehalose
Detailed outcome:
YES
YES
YES
Detailed outcome:
YES
NO
NO
Detailed outcome:
NO
Detailed outcome:
YES
Detailed outcome:
YES
YES
Detailed outcome:
YES
Detailed outcome:
YES
YES
Detailed outcome:
YES
NO
NO
Draft specifications
TREHALOSE_EU_ANNEX2_120500.doc
Trehalose
SYNONYMS α,α-trehalose
Structural formula
TREHALOSE_ACNFP_ANNEX_2_150200.doc
-2-
CHARACTERISTICS
IDENTIFICATION
PURITY
TREHALOSE_ACNFP_ANNEX_2_150200.doc
-3-
METHOD OF ASSAY Principle: Trehalose is identified by liq-
uid chromatography and quantified by com-
parison to a reference standard containing
standard trehalose.
Conditions:
Solvent: Water
Injection volume: 8 µl
TREHALOSE_ACNFP_ANNEX_2_150200.doc
-4-
mg, of trehalose in 1 ml of the sample so-
lution by the following formula:
RU
125 x C x --
RS
TREHALOSE_ACNFP_ANNEX_2_150200.doc
-5-
Annex 3
TREHALOSE_EU_PUBLIC_ANNEX3_COVERSHEET_MANU1_120500.doc
Annex 4
TREHALOSE_EU_PUBLIC_ANNEX4_COVERSHEET_MANU1_120500.doc
Annex 5
TREHALOSE_EU_PUBLIC_ANNEX5_COVERSHEET_MANU1_120500.doc
Annex 6
TREHALOSE_EU_PUBLIC_ANNEX6_COVERSHEET_MANU1_120500.doc