20240607-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl 110C-Deadly Pursuit & Arrest, Etc

Page 1
1
2
3 Reece Kershaw (Australian/Victoria date) 7-6-2024
4 Chief Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
5 Forwarded via email [email protected]
6
7 Cc: [email protected] Advisory Committee on Vaccines, Therapeutic Goods Administration
8 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606 Attn: Pharmacovigilance and Special Access Branch, MDP 122
9
10 [email protected] Committee Support Unit, Therapeutic Goods Administration
11 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606 Attn: Scheduling & Committee Support Section, MDP 122
12
13 Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus [email protected]
14
15 Jacinta Allan, Premier [email protected]
16 [email protected]
17
18 Re: 20240607-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl 110C-
19 Deadly pursuit & arrest, etc
20
21 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
22
23 COMPLAINT
24 Sir,
25 further to my original COMPLAINT of 6 August 2021 I provide a further supplement hereby.
26
27 https://www.globalresearch.ca/uk-telegraph-reports-skyrocketing-excess-
28 deaths/5859170?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles
29 British Media Report Confirms Skyrocketing Excess Deaths in All Highly COVID-19
30 Vaccinated Countries
31 QUOTE
32
33 END QUOTE
7-6-2024 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 2
1
2 Remember then Premier Daniel Andrews on his 2020 daily briefings claiming how many people
3 had died from covid? Well, above indicates far less people died in 2020 then in 2021, 2022 and
4 2023, hence, in my view they died more as a result of the FAKE covid-19 vaccine that really
5 was a “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION “bioweapon”.
6 Now apparently the ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) is reportedly fiddling about with the
7 figures to try to minimize the number of deaths by about half. As if it didn’t do enough harm to
8 conceal 2020 details it now in my view discredit its own trustworthiness.
9 I understand that the Deputy in charge of the ABS Trevor Sutton happens to be married to Jane
10 Halton who was involved in EVENT201 and his brother happened to be Brett Sutton the Chief
11 Health Officer in Victoria. As I understand it neither Trevor Sutton, Jane Halton or Brett Sutton
12 are qualified “medical doctors”.
13 Now we had the then Premier Daniel Andrews I understand neither a qualified medical doctor,
14 and then we have the then and since other Members of Parliament as Minister for Health in
15 Victoria neither being qualified medical doctors. And then the then Minister for Health Greg
16 Hunt (former Director of W.E.F.) I understand neither being a qualified medical doctor. And
17 then TGA John Skerritt I understand neither being a qualified medical doctor. Also, I understand
18 Klaus Schwab neither was a qualified medical doctor. And the same with the veterinarian
19 heading the WHO (World Health Organisation) not being a qualified medical doctor and let us
20 neither consider the head of the U.N. (United Nations) I understand is a qualified medical doctor,
21 Yet, somehow about 195 countries all were following the directions of veterinarian and
22 others NOT QUALIFIED as medical doctors to be a giving advice and/or making
23 decisions dictating qualified medical doctors what they could or couldn’t do with their patients,
24 etc.
25
26 OK, I never had any formal education to be a scientist or medical doctor but at least I am well
27 aware that if you have not even establish if a covid-19 virus actually exist then how on earth can
28 you than claim that some kind of poison jab is going to deal with this alleged covid-19 virus?
29
30 It reminds me to a case in which I represented Mr Francis James Colosimo who (while
31 represented by a Counsel) was placed under Order of Administration upon the evidence of two
32 expert medical doctors that he refused to accept that he was convicted for CONTEMPT OF
33 COURT and as such could not deal with his own private affairs. Mr Francis James Colosimo
34 then asked me to take over the case for an appeal because his claim was that he was never
35 convicted regarding CONTEMPT OF COURT. And it appeared to me that if no one could
36 produce any conviction but merely assumed he was convicted then surely he had a worthy
37 appeal. And, well, Harbison J made in subsequent proceedings clear to me that she never had
38 convicted Mr Francis James Colosimo as the case was still ongoing! In the end she never
39 convicted Mr Francis James Colosimo and I succeeded also in the Appeal to have the Order for
40 Administration set aside.
41
42 Likewise, with the “covid scam” I challenge all the afore mentions and their lackies to prove that
43 the alleged covid-19 virus was ever isolated and purified and establish it was an actual virus and
44 not some looney bin assumption!
45 As I indicated in Supplement 110B the Chinese appeared to have put in a computer all kinds of
46 sequences and the computer then decided to present a sequence it held was the best one to use.
47 That clearly was not an alleged sequence of patient zero. It was no reliable sequence at all of any
48 patient, but merely the computer taking bits from different sequences and then create one on its
49 own.
50 And that is what the scientist relied upon to create within 2 hours or 3 hours (depending which
51 video you rely upon) to establish a vaccine?
Page 3
1
2 Ok, let’s say someone claims that the Tooth Fairy actually pulls the teeth of children when they
3 are asleep and so I can now sell insurance policies to make sure that your child would not have
4 the tooth Fairy pulling your child’s tooth while asleep. Great, and you are willing to take out
5 such insurance policy for being an idiot?
6
7 Remember the MANDATES all to keep people out of hospitals, dying, etc? Well, exactly the
8 opposite was achieved. And remember the politicians parading getting the jab? Well, let’s do a
9 medical examination if indeed they had the jab and not some saline injection! Get them charged
10 for deceptive conduct.
11
12 If you call out “FIRE” in a theatre and panic eventuate you can be charged, and well the same
13 should apply to all the politicians and their lackies, officials, etc, all pushing this FAKE “covid
14 scam”. And let us include those collaborators the MSM (Main Stream Media) and the Big Tech
15 companies and the scientist/medical profession and others who make a lot of monies from this
16 elaborate deception.
17
18 QUOTE British Media Report Confirms Skyrocketing Excess Deaths in All Highly COVID-19 Vaccinated
19 Countries
20 https://www.globalresearch.ca/uk-telegraph-reports-skyrocketing-excess-
21 deaths/5859170?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles
22 British Media Report Confirms Skyrocketing Excess Deaths in All Highly COVID-19
24 By Dr. William Makis
25 QUOTE
26 Global Research, June 05, 2024
27 COVID Intel
28 Theme: Science and Medicine
29
30 All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate
31 Website button below the author’s name (only available in desktop version).
32 To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
33 Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues.
34 Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to
35 repost and share widely Global Research articles.
36 Global Research Wants to Hear From You!
37 ***
38 Excerpt from The Telegraph report
39 Covid vaccines could be partly to blame for the rise in excess deaths since the pandemic,
40 scientists have suggested.
41 Researchers from The Netherlands analysed data from 47 Western countries and
42 discovered there had been more than three million excess deaths since 2020, with the trend
43 continuing despite the rollout of vaccines and containment measures.
44 They said the “unprecedented” figures “raised serious concerns” and called on
45 governments to fully investigate the underlying causes, including possible vaccine harms.
46 Click here to read the full article on The Telegraph.
47 *
Page 4
1 Let’s look at the latest EXCESS DEATHS DATA:

2 Australia and New Zealand
3
4
5
6 Canada
7
8
9
10 Scandinavian Countries
11
12
13
14 Germany
15
16
17
18 Japan
19

Page 5
1
2
3 USA
4
5
6
7 My Take…
8 These graphs are made available by Twitter user USMortality.
9 What I find interesting is that there seems to be a drop in excess mortality in 2023 in this
10 data.
11 Ethical Skeptic’s data doesn’t show a dip in excess mortality in 2023, especially for young
12 people:
13
14
15
16 The Cover-up
17 We have an additional problem.
18 Countries are starting to change the way excess deaths are calculated, in an effort to hide
19 excess deaths.
20 Australian Russell Broadbent MP today (May 14, 2024) questioned the sleight of hand by
21 the Australian Bureau of Statistics in calculating excess deaths.
22 The model bas been revised twice and now excess deaths are down from 56058 to 24351
23 for 2020 – 2023. The ABS has not been transparent about this complicated new model
24 which rewrites the history of the Pandemic.
25
26
27 Click here to watch the video
28
29 UK has also changed the way it calculates Excess Deaths:
Page 6
1 Russell Brand posted this on Feb. 23, 2024 and it’s hilarious.
2
3
4 Click here to watch the video
5
6
7 *
8 Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter
9 and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global
10 Research articles.
11 Dr. William Makis is a Canadian physician with expertise in Radiology, Oncology and
12 Immunology. Governor General’s Medal, University of Toronto Scholar. Author of 100+
13 peer-reviewed medical publications.
14 Featured image source
15 END QUOTE
16 END QUOTE British Media Report Confirms Skyrocketing Excess Deaths in All Highly COVID-19
18
19 Any litigation against me by the State of Victoria or any of its officials, etc, would be faced
20 having to deal with the issues such as IDENTITY ID, DIGITAL money, “covid scam”,
21 unconstitutional “state land taxation” and many more.
22 You can download the document from:
23 https://www.scribd.com/document/729205808/20240504-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-
24 Jacinta-Allan-Premier-Ors
25 QUOTE 20240504-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Jacinta Allan Premier & Ors
26 Jacinta Allan, Premier (Australia, Victoria date) 4-5-2024
28
29 Re: 20240504-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Jacinta Allan
31
32 Madam,
33 a copy of this document will also be provided to Banyule City Council, Buloke Shire
34 Council, GWMWater, ATO and others.
35
36 As you might be aware (you can always consult your legal advisers) that the Supreme Court of
37 Victoria disposed of numerous charges against the Albert Park protesters as it held that the
38 purported legislation had not been gazetted.
39
40 WATSON v_ LEE (1979) 144 CLR 374;( JUDGE3 STEPHEN J.)
41 QUOTE

Page 7
1 As Scott L.J. said in Blackpool Corporation v. Locker (1948) 1 KB 349, at

2 p
3 361 , speaking there of sub-delegated legislation, "there is one quite general
4 question . . . of supreme importance to the continuance of the rule of law
5 under the British constitution, namely, the right of the public affected to
6 know what that law is". The maxim that ignorance of the law is no excuse forms the
7 "working hypothesis on which the rule of law rests in British democracy" but to
8 operate it requires that "the whole of our law, written or unwritten, is accessible to
9 the public - in the sense, of course, that at any rate its legal advisers have access to it at
10 any moment, as of right".
11 END QUOTE
12 Again;
13 QUOTE
14 it requires that "the whole of our law, written or unwritten, is
15 accessible to the public - in the sense, of course,
16 END QUOTE
17
18 Any Minister is deemed to be a “constitutional advisor” and therefore must know and
19 understand the relevant constitutions.
20
21 Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
22 Convention)
23 QUOTE
24 Mr. HIGGINS.-Suppose the sentry is asleep, or is in the swim with the other power?
25 Mr. GORDON.-There will be more than one sentry. In the case of a federal law, every member
26 of a state Parliament will be a sentry, and, every constituent of a state Parliament will be a
27 sentry. As regards a law passed by a state, every man in the Federal Parliament will be a
28 sentry, and the whole constituency behind the Federal Parliament will be a sentry.
29 END QUOTE
30
31 HANSARD 4-3-1891 Constitution Convention Debates
32 QUOTE Sir HENRY PARKES:
33 The resolutions conclude:
34 An executive, consisting of a governor-general, and such persons as may from time to
35 time be appointed as his advisers, such persons sitting in Parliament, and whose term of
36 office shall depend upon their possessing the confidence of the house of representatives
37 expressed by the support of the majority.
38 What is meant by that is simply to call into existence a ministry to conduct the affairs of
39 the new nation as similar as it can be to the ministry of England-a body of constitutional
40 advisers who shall stand as nearly as possible in the same relation to the representative of
41 the Crown here [start page 27] a her Majesty's imperial advisers stand is relation to the
42 Crown directly. These, then, are the principles which my resolutions seek to lay down as a
43 foundation, as I have already stated, for the new super structure, my object being to invite
44 other gentlemen to work upon this foundation so as to best advance the ends we have in
45 view.
46 END QUOTE
47
49 QUOTE Mr. OCONNOR.-
50 We must remember that in any legislation of the Commonwealth we are dealing with the
51 Constitution. Our own Parliaments do as they think fit almost within any limits. In this
52 case the Constitution will be above Parliament, and Parliament will have to conform
53 to it.
54 END QUOTE
Page 8
1 .
3 QUOTE
4 Mr. HIGGINS.-No, because the Constitution is not passed by the Parliament.
5 END QUOTE
6 .
7 Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
8 QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
9 No one is more in favour of that than I am. But, at the same time, it is said-"Let the Houses
10 of Parliament act capriciously and variously from day to day-allow this 'tacking' to go on if
11 the Houses choose to agree to it-let the Houses do one thing one day and another the next,
12 and do not bother about altering the Constitution, but trust the Parliament." Of course; but
13 Parliament must only be trusted when it is within the Constitution. The Senate of to-
14 day and the House of Representatives must not be put in a position superior to the
15 Constitution.
16 END QUOTE
17
19 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-
20 The record of these debates may fairly be expected to be widely read, and the
21 observations to which I allude might otherwise lead to a certain amount of
22 misconception.
23 END QUOTE
24
25 Therefore, when the federation commenced with the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution
26 Act 1900 (UK) it had a drastic impact upon the former Colonies, and so the legislative powers of
27 the Parliaments.
28
30 QUOTE
31 Mr. GORDON.-Well, I think not. I am sure that if the honorable member applies his
32 mind to the subject he will see it is not abstruse. If a statute of either the Federal or the
33 states Parliament be taken into court the court is bound to give an interpretation according
34 to the strict hyper-refinements of the law. It may be a good law passed by "the sovereign
35 will of the people," although that latter phrase is a common one which I do not care much
36 about. The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes on the
37 Constitution we will have to wipe it out." As I have said, the proposal I support retains
38 some remnant of parliamentary sovereignty, leaving it to the will of Parliament on either
39 side to attack each other's laws.
40 END QUOTE
41
43 QUOTE
44 Mr. BARTON.-I was going to explain when I was interrupted that the moment the
45 Commonwealth legislates on this subject the power will become exclusive.
46 END QUOTE
47
49 QUOTE
50 Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-If this is left as an exclusive power the laws of the
51 states will nevertheless remain in force under clause 100.
52 Mr. TRENWITH.-Would the states still proceed to make laws?

Page 9
1 Mr. BARTON.-Not after this power of legislation comes into force. Their existing laws
2 will, however, remain. If this is exclusive they can make no new laws, but the necessity of
3 making these new laws will be all the more forced on the Commonwealth.
4 END QUOTE
5
7 QUOTE Mr. HOWE.-
8 My only desire is to give power to the Federal Parliament to achieve a scheme for old-age
9 pensions if it be practicable, and if the people require it. No power would be taken away
10 from the states. The sub-section would not interfere with the right of any state to act in the
11 meantime until the Federal Parliament took the matter in hand.
12 END QUOTE
13
15 QUOTE
16 Mr. BARTON.-We are going to suggest that it should read as follows:-
17 the people of any race for whom it is deemed necessary to make any laws not applicable
18 to the general community; but so that this power shall not extend to authorize legislation
19 with respect to the affairs of the aboriginal race in any state.
20 Mr. ISAACS.-My observations were extended much further than that. The term general
21 community" I understand to mean the general community of the whole Commonwealth. If
22 it means the general community of the whole Commonwealth, I do not see the meaning of
23 saying that the Parliament of the Commonwealth shall have the exclusive authority to do
24 that, because any single state would have the right to do it under any circumstances. If it
25 means less than that-if it means the general community of a state-I do not see why it should
26 not be left to the state. We should be placed in a very awkward position indeed if any
27 particular state is forbidden to pass any distinctive legislation in certain well-known
28 instances. For instance, if Victoria should choose to enact that Afghans shall only get
29 hawkers' licences under certain conditions which are not [start page 228] applicable to
30 Europeans she may be debarred by this sub-section from doing so. I do not know how it
31 will affect our factory law in regard to the Chinese which does not operate beyond the
32 confines of Victoria at all.
33 Sir EDWARD BRADDON.-Why single out the Afghans?
34 Mr. ISAACS.-If any other race possess the same characteristic as the Afghans I will put
35 them in the same class. At all events, the expression general community" means the whole
36 community of the Commonwealth. I do not think that this has any application. If it is to
37 have any application at all, it seems to me to be intended to debar the state from passing
38 legislation-necessary legislation, but purely confined to that state. I do not think that that
39 sub-section ought to be there at all if that is the meaning of it.
40 Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-I think the original intention of this sub-section was
41 to deal with the affairs of such persons of other races-what are generally called inferior
42 races, though I do not know with how much warrant sometimes-who may be in the
43 Commonwealth at the time it is brought into existence, or who may under the laws of the
44 Commonwealth regulating aliens come into it. We have made the dealing with aliens,
45 which includes a certain degree of coloured immigration, a power of the Commonwealth,
46 and we have made the dealing with immigration a power of the Commonwealth, so that all
47 those of the races who come into the community after the establishment of the
48 Commonwealth will not only enter subject to laws made in respect to their immigration,
49 but will remain subject to any laws which the Commonwealth may specially devise for
50 them. There is no reason why the Commonwealth should not have power to devise such
51 laws.
52 Sir GEORGE TURNER.-An exclusive power?
53 Mr. BARTON.-It ought to have an exclusive power to devise such laws.
Page 10
1 Sir GEORGE TURNER.-If it does not exercise it can the state exercise it?
2 Mr. BARTON.-Once the Commonwealth legislates with reference to the question of
3 aliens and immigration, its legislation displaces the state law.
4 END QUOTE
5
7 QUOTE
8 Mr. TRENWITH (Victoria).-I respectfully submit in connexion with this clause that the
9 necessity for legislation in regard to aliens differs in the various colonies, and to give to the
10 Federal Parliament exclusive powers to legislate would produce inconvenience. This is
11 obviously so, for the reason that what is necessary in one state in connexion with the
12 treatment of aliens may be altogether unnecessary and perhaps inconvenient in another
13 state. Assuming that such contingencies may arise, any uniform legislation must work to
14 the detriment of some state; whereas if, as suggested by Sir George Turner, it is made
15 optional on the part of the Federal Parliament, wherever any great pressure arises, or a
16 necessity for uniform legislation occurs, to legislate, then the Federal Parliament will
17 undoubtedly take the question up and by its act achieve exclusive control in that connexion
18 so far as it chooses to legislate. But even then it may leave to local autonomy to deal with
19 the question in some connexion in a manner which may be [start page 236] necessitated by
20 the different circumstances of different localities. Take the colony of Victoria. We have
21 legislation in the form of a new Factories and Shops Act, which affects the Chinese in a
22 manner such as no other colony has yet thought it necessary to affect them. It may happen
23 that no other colony will think it necessary to legislate in that way. But there can be no
24 reason why the legislation which is thought necessary by the Victorian people should not
25 be permitted to continue in Victoria. I have given this illustration because it appears to me
26 that the circumstances of different localities may involve different necessities in connexion
27 with the treatment of aliens. It maybe possible that in South Australia, or in New South
28 Wales, or Tasmania, it may be necessary to take some action with reference to aliens that
29 may be extremely beneficial to those colonies, and inconvenient or possibly irksome in
30 Victoria. If the sub-section is, as suggested, taken from its present position and placed in
31 clause 52, it will leave power for the states to legislate as they think proper until the
32 Federal Parliament sees the necessity for bringing about some degree of uniformity. I
33 would submit to honorable members that the whole of our work points to the necessity for
34 giving nothing to the Federal Parliament to do that can be as well done in the interests of
35 the states by the States themselves. What we are endeavouring to do is to constitute a new
36 power which shall do some things which we cannot do as well as separate states. But we
37 wish to avoid handing over to the new power anything that will take from us that
38 sovereignty we now possess, unless it is absolutely necessary to do so. It does not seem to
39 me to be necessary to make it imperative in the Constitution that the sovereignty of the
40 states or their local autonomy in this connexion shall be removed. If the Federal Parliament
41 does not wish to legislate on the subject the local Parliaments should have the power to
42 legislate as their local requirements dictate.
43 END QUOTE
44
46 QUOTE
47 Sir JOHN DOWNER.-There must be some body which deems it necessary, and the only body to which
48 the words can refer is the Commonwealth Parliament. What very substantial difference does it make whether
49 we leave the provision as it stands or put it into clause 52? True, if the provision is left where it stands, the
50 Federal Parliament will have exclusive power in connexion with this matter; but that body will only have
51 exclusive power when it chooses to exercise it. It is only when the Federal Parliament has passed
52 legislation dealing with the people about whom regulations are to be made that this exclusive power
53 will have arisen.
54 END QUOTE
Page 11
1
3 QUOTE Mr. THYNNE:
4 The constitution of this federation will not be charged with the duty of resisting privileged
5 classes, for the whole power will be vested in the people themselves. They are the
6 complete legislative power of the whole of these colonies, and they shall be so. From [start
7 page 106] them will rise, first of all, the federal constitution which we are proposing to
8 establish, and in the next place will come the legislative powers of the several colonies.
9 The people will be the authority above and beyond the separate legislatures, and the royal
10 prerogative exercised, in their interest and for their benefit, by the advice of their ministers
11 will be practically vested in them. They will exercise the sovereignty of the states, they
12 will be charged with the full power and dignity of the state, and it is from them that we
13 must seek the giving to each of those bodies that will be in existence concurrently the
14 necessary powers for their proper management and existence. Each assembly, each
15 legislature, whether state or federal existing under this constitution, will be as Dicey again
16 says-a merely subordinate law-making body whose laws will be valid, whilst within the
17 authority conferred upon it by the constitution, but invalid and unconstitutional if they go
18 beyond the limits of such authority.
19 END QUOTE
20
22 QUOTE
23 The Hon. A. DEAKIN: I say the great bulk of them are of that character, and am open to refutation if I am
24 wrong, I should say that the whole of the thirty-seven subjects, but, indisputably, the great bulk of them, are
25 subjects on which no question of state rights and state interests could arise except by the merest accident. It
26 is, as the right hon. gentleman admitted, a grave defect in our constitution if we permit these questions to be
27 left for all time to be determined in a purely states house, or by a state referendum, when those questions
28 are not state questions-when they ought to be decided, not on state lines, but on national lines, and by a
29 national referendum.
30 END QUOTE
31 .
33 QUOTE
34 Mr. BARTON: I do not think it is a good thing under any circumstances that a judge
35 under a Federal Constitution, at any rate, should have anything to hope for from Parliament
36 or Government.
37 Mr. KINGSTON: Hear, hear.
38 Mr. BARTON: Where you have a sovereign Parliament, and the judge is merely the
39 interpreter of the laws as they arise, and not the guardian of a Constitution in the same
40 sense as a federal judge is, the same circumstances remain in part; but where you will have
41 a tribunal constantly charged with the maintenance of the Constitution against the inroads
42 which may be attempted to be made upon it by Parliament, then it is essential that no judge
43 shall have any temptation to act upon an unexpected weakness-for we do not know exactly
44 what they are when appointed-which may result, whether consciously or not, in biasing his
45 decisions in favor of movements made by the Parliament which might be dangerous to the
46 Constitution itself.
47 END QUOTE
48
50 QUOTE Sir EDWARD BRADDON.-
51 When we consider how vast the importance is that every word of the Constitution should
52 be correct, that every clause should fit into every other clause; when we consider the great
53 amount of time, trouble, and expense it would take to make any alteration, and that, if we
54 have not made our intentions clear, we shall undoubtedly have laid the foundation of
Page 12
1 lawsuits of a most extensive nature, which will harass the people of United Australia and
2 create dissatisfaction with our work, it must be evident that too much care has not been
3 exercised.
4 END QUOTE
5 .
7 QUOTE
8 Mr. OCONNOR (New South Wales).-The honorable and learned member (Mr. Isaacs) is I think correct
9 in the history of this clause that he has given, and this is [start page 672] one of those instances which should
10 make us very careful of following too slavishly the provisions of the United States Constitution, or any other
11 Constitution. No doubt in putting together the draft of this Bill, those who were responsible for doing so used
12 the material they found in every Constitution before it, and probably they felt that they would be incurring a
13 great deal of responsibility in leaving out provisions which might be in the least degree applicable. But it is
14 for us to consider, looking at the history and reasons for these provisions in the Constitution of the United
15 States, whether they are in any way applicable; and I quite agree with my honorable and learned friend (Mr.
16 Carruthers) that we should be very careful of every word that we put in this Constitution, and that we should
17 have no word in it which we do not see some reason for. Because there can be no question that in time to
18 come, when this Constitution has to be interpreted, every word will be weighed and an interpretation given
19 to it; and by the use now of what I may describe as idle words which we have no use for, we may be giving a
20 direction to the Constitution which none of us now contemplate. Therefore, it is incumbent upon us to see that
21 there is some reason for every clause and every word that goes into this Constitution.
22 END QUOTE
23
25 QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
26 Providing, as this Constitution does, for a free people to elect a free Parliament-giving that people
27 through their Parliament the power of the purse-laying at their mercy from day to day the existence
28 of any Ministry which dares by corruption, or drifts through ignorance into, the commission of any
29 act which is unfavorable to the people having this security, it must in its very essence be a free
30 Constitution. Whatever any one may say to the contrary that is secured in the very way in which the
31 freedom of the British Constitution is secured. It is secured by vesting in the people, through their
32 representatives, the power of the purse, and I venture [start page 2477] to say there is no other way
33 of securing absolute freedom to a people than that, unless you make a different kind of Executive
34 than that which we contemplate, and then overload your Constitution with legislative provisions to
35 protect the citizen from interference. Under this Constitution he is saved from every kind of
36 interference. Under this Constitution he has his voice not only in the, daily government of the
37 country, but in the daily determination of the question of whom is the Government to consist. There
38 is the guarantee of freedom in this Constitution. There is the guarantee which none of us have sought
39 to remove, but every one has sought to strengthen. How we or our work can be accused of not
40 providing for the popular liberty is something which I hope the critics will now venture to explain,
41 and I think I have made their work difficult for them. Having provided in that way for a free
42 Constitution, we have provided for an Executive which is charged with the duty of maintaining the
43 provisions of that Constitution; and, therefore, it can only act as the agents of the people. We have
44 provided for a Judiciary, which will determine questions arising under this Constitution, and with all
45 other questions which should be dealt with by a Federal Judiciary and it will also be a High Court of
46 Appeal for all courts in the states that choose to resort to it. In doing these things, have we not
47 provided, first, that our Constitution shall be free: next, that its government shall be by the will of the
48 people, which is the just result of their freedom: thirdly, that the Constitution shall not, nor shall any of
49 its provisions, be twisted or perverted, inasmuch as a court appointed by their own Executive, but
50 acting independently, is to decide what is a perversion of its provisions? We can have every faith in
51 the constitution of that tribunal. It is appointed as the arbiter of the Constitution. It is appointed not to
52 be above the Constitution, for no citizen is above it, but under it; but it is appointed for the purpose
53 of saying that those who are the instruments of the Constitution-the Government and the Parliament
54 of the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the Constitution, they are bound to
55 serve. What I mean is this: That if you, after making a Constitution of this kind, enable any
56 Government or any Parliament to twist or infringe its provisions, then by slow degrees you may have
57 that Constitution-if not altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the guarantees of freedom
58 which it gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the court you are
59 creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such a tribunal as will
60 preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent, under any pretext of constitutional

Page 13
1 action, the Commonwealth from dominating the states, or the states from usurping the sphere of the
2 Commonwealth. Having provided for all these things, I think this Convention has done well.
3 END QUOTE
4 .
6 QUOTE Mr. BARTON.
7 If we are going to give the Federal Parliament power to legislate as it pleases with
8 regard to Commonwealth citizenship, not having defined it, we may be enabling the
9 Parliament to pass legislation that would really defeat all the principles inserted
10 elsewhere in the Constitution, and, in fact, to play ducks and drakes with it. That is
11 not what is meant by the term "Trust the Federal Parliament."
12 END QUOTE
13
15 QUOTE
16 Dr. COCKBURN: All our experience hitherto has been under the condition of
17 parliamentary sovereignty. Parliament has been the supreme body. But when we embark
18 on federation we throw parliamentary sovereignty overboard. Parliament is no longer
19 supreme. Our parliaments at present are not only legislative, but constituent bodies. They
20 have not only the power of legislation, but the power of amending their constitutions. That
21 must disappear at once on the abolition of parliamentary sovereignty. No parliament
22 under a federation can be a constituent body; it will cease to have the power of
23 changing its constitution at its own will. Again, instead of parliament being supreme, the
24 parliaments of a federation are coordinate bodies-the main power is split up, instead of
25 being vested in one body. More than all that, there is this difference: When parliamentary
26 sovereignty is dispensed with, instead of there being a high court of parliament, you bring
27 into existence a powerful judiciary which towers above all powers, legislative and
28 executive, and which is the sole arbiter and interpreter of the constitution.
29 END QUOTE
30
31 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)
32 QUOTE
33 Chapter V—The States
34 106 Saving of Constitutions
35 The Constitution of each State of the Commonwealth shall, subject to this Constitution,
36 continue as at the establishment of the Commonwealth, or as at the admission or
37 establishment of the State, as the case may be, until altered in accordance with the
38 Constitution of the State.
39
40 107 Saving of Power of State Parliaments
41 Every power of the Parliament of a Colony which has become or becomes a State, shall,
42 unless it is by this Constitution exclusively vested in the Parliament of the
43 Commonwealth or withdrawn from the Parliament of the State, continue as at the
44 establishment of the Commonwealth, or as at the admission or establishment of the State,
45 as the case may be.
46 END QUOTE
47
48 Ok, it must be clear that the states within S106 of the constitution were created “subject to this
49 constitution” and as such bound by the legal principles of the federal constitution!
50
51 It must be very clear that all subject matters listed in Section 51 and 52 were withdrawn from the
52 former Colonial Parliaments now being State Parliaments, with this provisions that while the
53 Commonwealth had not as yet legislated upon any subject matter listed within Section 51 then
Page 14
1 the States could do so UNTIL the commonwealth began to legislate upon the subject matter and
2 the States then had to retire from this subject matter.
3
4 I understand that within British legislation any subsequent legislation may automatically be the
5 legislation that is relevant. As both the (colonial) Victorian Constitution Act 1855 (UK) and the
6 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) are both UK created constitutions then
7 the latter overrides the former for so far it is applicable.
8
9 What I require from you as Premier is to show where in the colonial Hansard the last updated
10 (colonial) Victorian Constitution Act 1855 (UK) was published with all amendments up to
11 before 1 January 1901. I also require you to provide me with a copy of the Victorian Hansard to
12 show the amended version of the (colonial) Victorian Constitution Act 1855 (UK) to the 1
13 January 1901 (State) Victorian Constitution Act 1855 (UK). The latter one showing the
14 withdrawal of subject matters as per Section 51 & 52 of the Commonwealth of Australia
15 Constitution Act 1900 (UK) subject matters having been withdrawn from the State Victorian
16 Parliament, Further, I require you to provide me with the Hansard publication setting out the
17 State Parliament can exercise “concurrent” legislative powers of subject matters listed in Section
18 51 and so each Hansard publication showing each subject matter having ben withdrawn from
19 “concurrent” legislative powers where the commonwealth had commenced to legislate upon each
20 particular subject matter.
21
22 To give an example:
23 The Commonwealth legislated the Quarantine Act 1908 (since then it became the Biosecurity
24 Act 2015 (Cth) and as such from that moment the states no longer could legislate as to
25 Quarantine issues and any former legislation no longer were applicable. Hence, the state of
26 Victoria should have published in the Gazette that it no longer had legislative powers as to any
27 matters relating to quarantine involving “man-kind” infectious diseases.
28
30 QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-
31 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd
32 clause, is intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any
33 quarantine. That simply applies to quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
34 END QUOTE
35
36 This means that any kind of “man-kind” infectious disease for which any form of quarantine is
37 required since 1908 no longer fell within the ambit of the State Parliament. It means that the
38 alleged “mandates” regarding the “covid scam” were and remain to be
39 “UNCONSTITUTIONAL”.
40
41 I am aware about the High Court of Australia decision in Palmer v WA and actually stated the
42 following:
43
45 QUOTE
46 Sir JOHN DOWNER.-Now it is coming out. The Constitution is made for the people and
47 the states on terms that are just to both.
48 END QUOTE
49
50 The Court however in Palmer v WA stated:
51
52 https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2021/5.html
Page 15
1 Palmer v Western Australia [2021] HCA 5 (24 February 2021)

2 QUOTE
3 291. By contrast, the purpose of public health provisions such as ss 56 and 67 is plainly
4 sufficient to justify even the deep and wide burden that the application of those
5 provisions can place upon the freedom prescribed by s 92. Indeed, at federation it
6 was contemplated that the application of provisions of this nature might be justified
7 despite the imposition of such deep or wide burdens. During the Sydney debates,
8 after one of the delegates, Dr Cockburn, expressed a fear that the clause as drafted
9 might prevent laws prohibiting the passing of cattle across State borders or the
10 introduction of diseased vines into South Australia, Mr O'Connor, quoting from a
11 prolific writer from the United States[465], set out a good description of the
12 operation of structured proportionality in this area[466]:
13 "By parity of reason addressed to the protection of the public health, states
14 may exercise their police powers to the extent of prohibiting both persons
15 and animals, when labouring under contagious diseases, from entering their
16 territory. They may pass any sanitary laws deemed necessary for this
17 purpose, and enforce them by appropriate regulations. It is upon this reserved
18 right of self-protection, that quarantines are permitted to interfere with the
19 freedom of commerce and of human intercourse. But this power is not without its
20 limitations, and its exercise must be restricted to directly impending dangers to
21 health, and not to those who are only contingent and remote. Hence, while
22 diseased persons or diseased animals, and those presumedly so from contact
23 with infected bodies or localities, may be prevented from entering a state, any
24 general law of exclusion, measured by months, or operating in such a way as
25 to become a barrier to commerce or travel, would be a regulation of
26 commerce forbidden by the constitution. Such a statute being more than a
27 quarantine regulation, transcends the legitimate powers of a state."
28 292. Subsequently, Mr Barton said, in terms reflecting the first stage of structured
29 proportionality, that "the power to prevent the introduction of diseases would still
30 remain with the states, except in so far as any state law was found to be an
31 intentional derogation from the freedom of trade"[467].
32
33 Official Record of the Debates of the Australasian Federal Convention (Sydney), 22
34 September 1897 at 1062.
35 Conclusion
36 293. For these reasons, I join in the orders that were made on 6 November 2020.
37 END QUOTE
38
39 Over the decades I became aware how judges would twist the truth/facts by taking out of context
40 what was relevant as to seek to justify a ruling/orders they all along may have intended to make.
41
42 On 22 September 1897 as shown in the transcript the Chairman of the Constitutional Convention
43 commented:
44 QUOTE
45 The CHAIRMAN: I would point out that there is no question of quarantine or
46 quarantine regulations before the Committee.
47 END QUOTE
48
49 It therefore must be very clear that what the Chairman did was to make clear that
50 QUARANTINE issues were not debatable at that time. However, on 7-2-1898 which was at a
51 later date then the QUARANTINE issue was debated and then Barton clearly commented
Page 16
1 regarding “man-kind” diseases. Therefore the difference between what was debated on 22-9-
2 1897 and 7-2-1898 was considerable. I cannot accept that 5 High Court of Australia judges with
3 having their office staff somehow none of them were aware about the differences and somehow
4 all never were aware of what Barton had stated on 7-2-1898! For clarification I will reproduce
5 parts of the transcript of both days of the Constitutional Convention Debates.
6
7 Now let us consider the following of the Hansard transcripts:
8
10 QUOTE
11 The Hon. R.E. O'CONNOR (New South Wales)[12.42]: It may be interesting for the hon.
12 and learned member, Dr. Cockburn, to hear this very concise statement of the law of the
13 United States, which would be exactly applicable to this proposed constitution, and very
14 much on the lines that the hon. and learned member, Mr. Isaacs, has just stated. I am citing
15 from a well-known book, Ordronaux's "Constitutional Legislation." At page 296 he says
16 this:
17 By, parity of reason addressed to the protection of the public health, states may
18 exercise their police powers to the extent of prohibiting both persons and animals,
19 when labouring under contagious diseases, from entering their territory. They may
20 pass any sanitary laws deemed necessary for this purpose, and enforce them by
21 appropriate regulations. It is upon this reserved right of self-protection that
22 quarantines are permitted to interfere with the freedom of commerce and of human
23 intercourse. But this power is not without its limitations, and its exercise must be
24 restricted to directly impending dangers to health, and not to those who are only
25 contingent and remote. Hence, while diseased persons or diseased animals, and those
26 presumedly so from contact with infected bodies or. localities, may be prevented from
27 entering a state, any general law of exclusion, measured by months, or operating in
28 such a way as to become a barrier to commerce or travel, would be a regulation of
29 commerce forbidden by the constitution. Such a statute being more than a quarantine
30 regulation, transcends the legitimate powers of a state.
31 So it is quite clear that all the powers are left in the state, which are necessary for
32 the preservation of the health of the inhabitants and of the property by the state.
33 Those powers would include power to deal with such diseases in the vegetable world as the
34 hon. and learned member; Dr. Cockburn, has spoken of, and also with animal diseases. It
35 was suggested in Adelaide that these powers might be used in such a way as to have a
36 protective influence in favour of certain states.
37 Mr. Symon: That would be in conflict with the constitution!
38 The Hon. R.E. O'CONNOR: I was going to point that out. There are a number of
39 decisions in America, as has been pointed out by my hon. and learned friend, in
40 which on that very ground or similar grounds it has been held that the law, not being
41 a bona fide exercise of the police powers, is not within the powers of the state. Of
42 course, there is another question behind all that, which I think is a very important one, that
43 is, considering the immense traffic, say, in cattle, that there is right across this continent,
44 the infrequency of habitation, and the difficulties of enforcing the quarantine laws from
45 state to state, whether such a disease, for instance, as the tick disease should be dealt with
46 by the authority of the commonwealth instead of by the states themselves. It is a very
47 important question, and there are many difficulties in the way of its being dealt with by the
48 federal authority. One of the chief of them is, I think, the impossibility of the federal
49 authority administering an act of that kind without having an enormous array of officials
50 and immense expenditure. As we all know, there are in each colony laws-affecting
51 contagious diseases of cattle or sheep, and they are all administered by local bodies, The
52 machinery and administration are simple, and the laws are cheaply worked in the various
Page 17
1 districts themselves. But if you place them under the federal movement, to be operated
2 by federal officers, you render an [start page 1063] immense machinery necessary to
3 carry out the very simple objects which are carried out by the local bodies at the
4 present time. It appears to me that the balance of reason is in favour of leaving things as
5 they are, leaving power in the states to deal with all those matters that come under the head
6 of police powers in the United States, the infection of animals, the infection of vegetables,
7 the introduction of, animal and vegetable diseases. There is ample power to deal with
8 them, and I think that the matter might be left in that way.
9 The CHAIRMAN: I would point out that there is no question of quarantine or
10 quarantine regulations before the Committee.
11 END QUOTE
12
13 As such, the debate the High Court of Australia quoted was about ordinary diseases to which no
14 QUARANTINE MANDATES was required. The High Court of Australia in my view took out
15 of context what the real intentions of the Framers of the Constitution was about! Consider the
16 following:
17
19 QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-
20 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd
21 clause, is intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any
22 quarantine. That simply applies to quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
23 END QUOTE
24
25 To show how this was stated in context:
26
28 QUOTE
29 Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-I remember well that this question was raised in
30 Adelaide by the honorable member (Dr. Cockburn), and there is a great deal in it. The
31 section in the American Constitution is as follows:-
32 No state shall, without the consent of Congress, lay any imposts or duties on imports or
33 exports except what may be absolutely necessary for executing its inspection laws; and the
34 net produce of all duties and imposts made by any state on imports or exports shall be for
35 the use of the Treasury of the United States, and all such laws shall be subject to the
36 revision and control of the Congress.
37 Then it goes on to other subjects, such as maintaining armies and levying war. A case
38 which the honorable member (Mr. Isaacs) mentioned appears clearly to go the length
39 which he suggested, that is that this section as it exists in the American Constitution, or the
40 parallel clause, does not deal with inter-state commerce but only with imports from or
41 exports to foreign countries. That might be got rid of, as far as this clause is concerned, by
42 a small amendment. For instance, after the words "imports and exports," we might insert
43 "inter-state or foreign" or similar words. That will show clearly that the power was
44 intended to be reserved to the states to deal with importation even from other colonies of
45 such pests as have been mentioned. It might be as well between now and the next occasion
46 upon which we deal with this clause to draft an amendment to meet the position. Mr. Isaacs
47 has referred me to a decision in America, in the State of Minnesota v. Barber, 136 U.S.,
48 313, which goes this length:-
49 The statute of Minnesota providing for inspection within the state of animals designed for
50 meat, by its necessary operation practically excludes from the markets of that state all fresh
51 beef, veal, mutton, lamb, or pork, in whatever form, if taken from animals slaughtered in
52 other states, notwithstanding the same may be sound and healthy. The result is that it thus
Page 18
1 directly tends to restrict the slaughtering of animals whose meat is to be sold in Minnesota
2 to those engaged in such business in that state. This discrimination is an encumbrance on
3 commerce amongst states, and is unconstitutional. It cannot be regarded as a rightful
4 exertion of the police power of the state. A burden thus imposed is not to be sustained
5 simply because the statute imposing it applies alike to the people of all the states, including
6 the state enacting it.
7 That is a statute which applied to every animal, whether sound and healthy or not,
8 entering the state and designed for meat. That does not apply to the case which arises under
9 the clause with which we are now dealing. What we want here, I take it, is to see that the
10 states retain power to deal with these pests not in the way of prohibition-and the law which
11 was referred to in that case was a prohibition, and was therefore declared unconstitutional.
12 But we want here a provision that the states shall be able to exercise their powers as
13 individual states at proper places such as the ports and borders. That will not be an
14 infringment of free-trade within the Commonwealth. The way to look at it is: Is it desirable
15 that this power shall be placed in the Commonwealth or among the powers of the states? I
16 am inclined [start page 651] strongly to the latter view. I do not think the word
17 quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd clause, is
18 intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any quarantine.
19 That simply applies to quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind. I do not
20 think it is intended to enable the Commonwealth to deal with such matters as the tick
21 disease. It has been pointed out by the honorable member (Mr. Fraser) that the Federation
22 should have that power. As far as I am at present advised, that would be a very unwieldy
23 and difficult power for the Commonwealth to use at all. It requires the local knowledge
24 which would only be possessed by the states Parliaments and Governments. I am in favour
25 of the amendment suggested by the honorable member (Mr. Isaacs), and I shall prepare an
26 amendment to make it quite clear that the states shall have power to deal with this matter,
27 not by way of putting on imposts, but simply making charges to enable them to carry out
28 inspection laws.
29 END QUOTE
30
31 The High Court of Australia clearly failed to refer to this part
32
33 That simply applies to quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
34
35 To have concealed this from the judgment I consider to be unacceptable to have been
36 accidentally. It is absurd to hold that 5 judges assisted by their staff who may do most of the
37 research somehow none of them would have been aware of what was stated about
38 “QUARANTINE” this even so the very notion of “MANDATES” were to isolate people and
39 confine them to certain areas, even restricting them to so to say house arrest, etc.
40
41 The very purpose of the “covid scam” was to restrict the rights of people, and this was made
42 very clear also by the exposure by Veritas ( some shown below) where pharmaceutical
43 companies did set up this elaborate “covid scam” to restrict people so they be injected with a
44 “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION “bio weapon” and this was part of the elaborate scam,
45 including “covid-19 PCR test” being sold to numerous countries in 2017 and 2018 even so the
46 “covid-19” alleged virus was not named until January 2020!
47
48 We have the WHO making known a “Disease X” is going to come around likely 100 times more
49 deadly than covid -19. As if the WHO has somehow a crystal ball to see the future. Then again
50 so did Bill Gates make known there would be certain diseases. Well, it appears to me that he
51 released mosquito’s in the USA such as Florida and people did become ill. In fact before that
Page 19
1 mosquitos were reportedly released in Africa to protect the people but it turned out that more
2 people died. Then in India again mosquitos were released and I understand again there was an
3 escalation of people dying.
4 Reportedly NAZI Ukraine had some 58 laboratories and was releasing mosquitos, etc, such as
5 those in Russian Federation areas and I understand from documentation that Dorothy Institute in
6 Melbourne was one of the contractors to NAZI Ukraine laboratories.
7
8 It seems that the alleged “covid-19” virus was so deadly that Neil Ferguson if the ridiculous
9 computer prediction made known that fir the benefit of the financial supporters it would be better
10 to claim that Hey Fever was part of the disease.
11
12 https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/german-government-admits-there-was-no-pandemic/
13 GENOCIDE
14 GERMAN GOVERNMENT ADMITS THERE WAS NO PANDEMIC
15 QUOTE
16 Huge news out of Germany as the federal government have been forced to admit that so-
17 called “conspiracy theorists” were right about everything during the Covid pandemic.
18 In fact, according to the German government data, there was no pandemic at all, just a
19 tightly choreographed military grade psy-op to brainwash the masses into accepting an
20 experimental vaccine with disastrous consequences.
21 These secret German government documents obtained via a Freedom of Information
22 request and subsequent lawsuit have blown the lid of the global elite’s Covid lies and the
23 it’s vitally important that as many people as possible are made aware of the truth.
24 END QUOTE
25
26 https://www.globalresearch.ca/official-vaccine-passport-scam/5854621
27 WHO Official Admits Vaccine Passports May Have Been a Scam
28 Testifying in a lawsuit, WHO’s leading vaccine expert said she advised against COVID vaccine
29 passports as the vaccines did not stop transmission and gave a false sense of security.
30 QUOTE
31 The World Health Organization’s Dr. Hanna Nohynek testified in court that she advised
32 her government that vaccine passports were not needed but was ignored, despite
33 explaining that the COVID vaccines did not stop virus transmission and the passports
34 gave a false sense of security. The stunning revelations came to light in a Helsinki
35 courtroom where Finnish citizen Mika Vauhkala is suing after he was denied entry to a
36 café for not having a vaccine passport.
37 Dr. Nohynek is chief physician at the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and
38 serves as the WHO’s chair of Strategic Group of Experts on immunization. Testifying
39 yesterday, she stated that the Finnish Institute for Health knew by the summer of
40 2021 that the COVID-19 vaccines did not stop virus transmission.
41 END QUOTE
42
43 https://www.globalresearch.ca/lockdowns-could-cause-more-harm-than-covid-19-no-evidence-wearing-masks-
44 useful-german-health-body-admitted-during-coronavirus-pandemic-released-documents-
45 show/5853927?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles
46 Bombshell: Official Data from Germany’s Ministry of Health Confirms The Devastating
47 Impacts of The Covid Lockdowns, “More Harm Than COVID-19”
48 The German Government's Report Confirms the legitimacy and validity of the numerous
49 independent scientific reports on the alleged pandemic, which have been the object of censorship
50 QUOTE
51 March 11, 2020, Biggest Lie in World History: There Never Was A Pandemic. The
52 Data Base is Flawed. The Covid Mandates including the Vaccine are Invalid
53 By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, March 30, 2024
Page 20
1 Today March 11, 2024: Four Years Ago the Covid-19 Lockdown was imposed in one fell
2 swoop by national governments Worldwide.
3 The Lockdown implied: “Confining the Labour Force” and “Freezing the Work Place”.
4 Not a single economist has acknowledged this relationship. From their standpoint, it was
5 the virus which triggered economic and social collapse. What nonsense.
6 What does this imply. The most serious economic and social crisis in World history which
7 four years later is still ongoing, leading to economic chaos and mass poverty Worldwide.
8 Destabilizing the social, political and economic structure of 190 sovereign countries
9 cannot constitute a “solution” to combating the virus.
10 But that was the imposed “solution” which was implemented in several stages from the
11 very outset of the corona crisis in January 2020.
12 It’s the destruction of people’s lives. It is the destabilization of civil society.
13 Fake science was supportive of this devastating agenda. The lies were sustained by a
14 massive media disinformation campaign. 24/7, Incessant and Repetitive “Covid alerts” in
15 the course of the last four years.
16 The historic March 11, 2020 lockdown triggered economic and social chaos Worldwide. It
17 was an act of “economic warfare”: a war against humanity.
18 This diabolical agenda has undermined the sovereignty of nation states
19 END QUOTE
20
21 https://www.globalresearch.ca/invalid-data-drives-catastrophic-public-policies-
22 globally/5796827?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_art
23 icles
24 Invalid Covid Data Drives Catastrophic Public Policies Globally
25 QUOTE
26 The COVID database is invalid.
27 First, the tests are not fit for purpose. Dr. Michael Yeadon describes the PCR tests as the
28 “central operational deceit.” (1) The CDC itself withdrew its support for these tests as of
29 January 2022 . (2) Similarly, rapid antigen test data is invalid. The test insert states
30 specifically under Intended Use Advisory that
31 “Positive results indicate the presence of viral antigens, but clinical correlation with patient
32 history and other diagnostic information is necessary to determine infection status. Positive
33 results do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent
34 detected may not be the definite cause of disease.” (emphasis mine)
35 As for the WHO which is the fountainhead of the global plandemic, even this institution of
36 corruption, funded in large part by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, has admitted to
37 the failings of the PCR tests. (3)
38 So the basis for determining the existence of “confirmed cases” is flawed on multiple
39 levels.
40 The data for COVID mortality rates is also flawed and invalid.
41 The CDC changed coding to death certificates for COVID in March 2020, prior to the
42 declared pandemic. CODING changes falsely elevate COVID as cause of death by a factor
43 of about 17 times. How? So-called “COVID deaths” would have been deemed due to other
44 causes using the long-standing, peer-reviewed system of data collection and reporting
45 established in 2003. (4)
46 END QUOTE
47
48 https://www.globalresearch.ca/tests-invalid-politicians-lying/5741853
49 Covid Tests Are Invalid. Politicians Are Lying.5 April 2021
50

Page 21
1 https://www.globalresearch.ca/bombshell-cdc-no-longer-recognizes-the-pcr-test-as-a-valid-method-for-
2 detecting-confirmed-covid-19-cases/5765179
3 Bombshell: CDC No Longer Recognizes the PCR Test As a Valid Method for Detecting "Confirmed
4 Covid-19 Cases"?6 April 2022
5
6 https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-test-insert-admits-results-scientifically-invalid/5787069
7 COVID Antigen Test Results Are Scientifically Invalid. Confirmed by the Pharmaceutical
8 "Intended Use" Advisory19 July 2022
9
10 QUOTE 20211009-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Reece Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the Australian
11 Federal Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-16-The AFP conspiracy
12 https://www.globalresearch.ca/pfizer-scientists-caught-undercover-admitting-pfizer-evil-natural-immunity-
13 better-than-covid-19-
14 vaccine/5757751?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles
15 Pfizer Scientists Caught Undercover Admitting Pfizer Is Evil and that Natural
16 Immunity Is Better than the COVID-19 Vaccine
17 (Image not reproduced)
18 I watched a video by Veritas (Pfizer JOHNSON & JOHNSON Scientists Caught
19 Undercover Admitting that Natural Immunity is Better than Their Vaccine
20 https://www.bitchute.com/video/L2FhBNI6FK9q/) and I understand that scientist working
21 for pharmaceutical companies may have a NDA (non disclosure agreement) but
22 nevertheless admitted that people are forced to be vaccinated by having countries to deny
23 unvaccinated people certain rights so that in the end they are forced to be vaccinated.
24 END QUOTE 20211009-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Reece Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the
25 Australian Federal Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-16-The AFP conspiracy
26
27 The following underlines that the Pharmaceutical companies were behind the whole MANDATE
28 issue and to use it to force people to have the jab no matter what or be punished, and this is
29 precisely how the States, including State of Victoria were going on, as to do what the foreign
30 enemy forces were pursuing against citizens. The Commonwealth has no constitutional
31 legislative powers to permit to authorise the WHO (read UN, W.E.F.) to dictate health issues
32 which fall within the powers of the states and neither can authorise the WHO to dictate jabs
33 when the commonwealth itself cannot do so but would require a Court order to force anyone to
34 be jabbed.
35
36 QUOTE 20211014-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the Australian
37 Federal Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-18-Arrest them now
38 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNIj83XNNeE
39 Johnson & Johnson 'Kids Shouldn’t Get A F cking [COVID] Vaccine;' There are
40 Unknown Repercussions
41 My kind of transcribing the video but better check for one selves in case I made a typing
42 error.
43 (PV stands for Project Veritas) (Starting at 1.39)
44 START
45 PV JOURNALIST:
46 So, I should tell her [12 year old cousin] to not get the Johnson and Johnson one?
47
48 PV JOURNALIST:
49 Don’t get the Johnson and Johnson.
50
51 JUSTIN DURRANT, SCIENTIST, JOHNSON & JOHNSON:
52 Don’t get the Johnson and Johnson- [winks]
Page 22
1 I didn’t tell you though.

2
4 Only way people really act, and - - comply, if it affects their pocket.
5
7 So, it is like, if you’re working for a big company and you’re going to lose your job, best
8 believe you’ll be the first one in the line.
9
11 I mean, if you can’t work, I feel like that’s punishment enough.
12
14 Like, a second grader [class] citizen- like you can’t do anything that a normal citizen can
15 do.
16
18 Inconvenience them to the point where it’s like, it’s the holiday- no, not the holiday –
19 but like- I might as well just f*cking do it.
20
21 PV JOURNALIST:
22 So, you said I shouldn’t trust the media?
23
24 BRANDON SCHADT, BUSINESS LEAD, JOHNSON & JOHNSON:
25 In no capacity should we ever trust anything that they say.
26
27 Voice (medical doctor):
28 The government doesn’t want to show
29
30 Voice (medical doctor):
31 That the darn vaccine is full of shit.
32
33 Pfizer JOHNSON & JOHNSON employee:
34 There need to be a registry of people who aren’t vaccinated.
35
37 That’s sounding very [Nazi] Germany.
38
40 I’m gonna go door-to-door and stab everyone,
41
43 “Oh, it’s just your booster shot!”
44
45 Voice:
46 Don’t get the Johnson & Johnson?
47
48 Voice:
49 I didn’t tell you though.
50
51 Voice (re Pfizer JOHNSON & JOHNSON):
Page 23
1 They are not reporting.

2
3 Voice (re Pfizer JOHNSON & JOHNSON):
4 Because they want to shove it under the mat.
5
6 Voice:
7 why do you think there is such a strong push for it?
8
9 Voice (Johnson & Johnson):
10 Numbers.
11
13 Laws like that, if you want to go to a bar, you need to come in with Covid test-like
14 inconvenience there people so much- that they’re just like, f*ck it. I need to just get this.
15
17 That’s what we’re doing.
18
19 PV JOURNALIST:
20 So, that’s what we need to do?
21
23 That’s what we’re doing.
24
26 Inconvenience them to the point where it’s like, it’s holiday-no, not the holiday-but like-I
27 might as well just f*cking do it, you know what I’m saying? Like I can’t go out of state…
28
30 …I can’t- my grandma’s in Canada. I can’t visit her, you know what I am saying-‘cause-
31 you can’t go to France, unless you’re vaccinated. I can’t go to [inaudible]-you know…
32
34 You’ve just got to keep doing things like that to-where it’s almost like you’re almost
35 like a second grade [class] citizen, if you’re not vaccinated-I know that is awful.
36
37 PV JOURNALIST:
38 You’re almost what?
39
41 Like, a second grade [class] citizen-like you can’t do anything that a normal citizen
42 can do.
43
44 PV JOURNALIST:
45 A second grade [class] citizen?
46
48 Yeah like-top graded like the ones that get it, and the ones that just like [makes a
49 lower hand gesture] – you can’t do shit.
50
51 PV JOURNALIST:
Page 24
1 So, then how do we punish them?

2
4 I mean if you can’t work, I feel like that’s punishment enough… money, it hurst
5 them.
6
7 PV JOURNALIST:
8 People what?
9
11 People-the only way people really act, and – comply, if it affects their pockets.
12
14 So, it’s like, if you’re working for a big company and you’re going to lose your job,
15 best believe you’ll be the first one in the line.
16
17 PV JOURNALIST:
18 Right.
19
21 You know (laughs).
22
23 PV JOURNALIST:
24 So, if you’re working for a big company and you’re about to lose your job, you’ll be the
25 first one in the line?
26
28 Yes.
29
30 PV JOURNALIST:
31 So true- so true. So, that’s what-that’s smart, that’s what we need to do.
32
34 And that’s what we’re doing.
35
37 Just counting this straight heads – not like – Ohh… it’s a baby, it’s up to them, you
38 hear what I’m saying, it’s – everyone needs to vax.
39
41 You really – you really don’t need to vaccinated a baby, you don’t need to vaccinate a
42 baby…
43
45 ..especially if it’s not going to school, it’s not going out, it’s in your house- it’ll probably
46 be fine.
47
48 PV JOURNALIST:
49 So, at what age do you think people should?
50
Page 25
1 Once you go out and you’ve got to go to preschool, you’re out – like I don’t know, what
2 the hell Johnny down-the-block was doing, right – so, that’s when you need to start [to]
3 vaccinate.
4
5 PV JOURNALIST:
6 Okay, so then – if you think that babies like don’t need to get vaccinated, then why do you
7 think there’s such a strong push for it?
8
10 Numbers.
11
12 PV JOURNALIST:
13 I should tell her to not get the Johnson and Johnson one? Is that what you are saying?
14
15 PV JOURNALIST:
16 Don’t get the Johnson and Johnson.
17
19 Don’t get the Johnson and Johnson- [winks] I didn’t tell you though.
20
21 PV JOURNALIST:
22 She doesn’t necessarily need to because she’s young?
23
25 Yeah, traditionally it’s not necessary.
26
27 PV JOURNALIST:
28 Yeah.
29
31 But again, she should get it, just out of her civic- her civic duty as a- you know?
32
33 PV JOURNALIST:
34 But it really wouldn’t make that much of a difference?
35
37 It wouldn’t make that much of a difference, no.
38
39 PV JOURNALIST:
40 Yeah.
41
42 PV JOURNALIST:
43 So, what would you say, homeschool or get the vaccine?
44
46 Honesty, I don’t think a kid needs to get it, but that’s just me.
47
48 PV JOURNALIST:
49 Why not?
50
Page 26
1 Because it’s a kid, it’s a f*cking kid- you know? Kids shouldn’t have to get a f*cking
2 vaccine, they’re kid, you know.
3
5 It’s just a kid who’s not developed yet- there’s so much growth, you know. And you’re
6 young- you can rebound from the virus- it’ll be fine.
7
9 They shouldn’t be getting it because, “You could spread to other people,” you know-
10 because you’re a kid , you know.
11
13 It’s terrible.
14
15 PV JOURNALIST:
16 What about it is terrible in your eyes?
17
19 It’s like the same concept of you don’t do things to kids right, you don’t put kids through
20 certain things you put adults through…
21
23 …it just that kind of category for me.
24
25 PV JOURNALIST:
26 Right.
27
29 It’s a kid, you just don’t do that, you know- not something that’s so unknown in terms
30 of repercussions down the road, you know.
31
32 PV JOURNALIST:
33 So, would you say we don’t know the repercussions of it?
34
36 I mean, how could you- right- there’s nobody who’s thirty years in, who said, “Hey, I
37 had the vaccine and I don’t have a third eye ball”…
38
39 PV JOURNALIST:
40 So, you’re probably loving work right now then.
41
43 Yeah, it’s a little, it’s not like – it’s weird because they want us to get the J&J and I was
44 like, just look at the effectiveness of like, “No” – I’m good I mean you just look at the
45 effectiveness of like -
46
47 PV JOURNALIST:
48 So, you didn’t take it?
49
51 Oh no I did, I took the moderna.
Page 27
1
2 PV JOURNALIST:
3 Oh, you took it?
4
6 Yeah – yeah.
7
8 PV JOURNALIST:
9 So, why is everyone leaning away from the Johnson and Johnson one?
10
12 I don’t know it could be in part like an F U- I’m not going to get your vaccine if
13 you’re going to force me to do this…
14
16 It could be too because people just don’t trust them, you know.
17
18 PV JOURNALIST:
19 But never Johnson & Johnson?
20
22 No.
23
24 PV JOURNALIST:
25 Why though?
26
28 I don’t know. The 60% thing and the blood clots that they reported.
29
30 PV JOURNALIST:
31 So, what do you think this is about?
32 Do you think it’s about the money?
33
35 Collection of everything I bet.
36
37 PV JOURNALIST:
38 What?
39
41 Collection of everything I bet.
42
43 PV JOURNALIST:
44 What do you mean?
45
47 Politics, money – a lot of people trying to make the right decision, but being stuck in
48 their position of – am I being influenced by somebody to go one side or the other.
49

Page 28
1 No, no, I don’t think anybody’s going to say anything either, if something went wrong
2 you know-
3
4 PV JOURNALIST:
5 Why not?
6
8 People are private you know, even J&J.
9
10 PV JOURNALIST:
11 What?
12
14 Even J&J is [private].
15
17 You’re not going to hear about that stuff like – if something bad is going on – like
18 alright, for the 13 years that I’ve been there…
19
21 …at least my time in consumer products, they’ve got Tylenol that was laced with like
22 cyanide, something bad happened there-
23
25 They had to recall products.
26
27 PV JOURNALIST:
28 I don’t know if I trust people – I don’t know if I trust like – what the media tells us, you
29 know.
30
32 Nope, you shouldn’t.
33
34 PV JOURNALIST:
35 So, you said I shouldn’t trust the media?
36
38 No, why should we? Why the hell should we? Hell no, no chance.
39
40 PV JOURNALIST:
41 What do you mean by that?
42
44 In no capacity should we ever trust anything that they [media] say.
45 FINISH
46 END QUOTE 20211014-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the
47 Australian Federal Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-18-Arrest them now
48
49
51 QUOTE

Page 29
1 Mr. WISE.-You cannot impose exceptional treatment upon the citizens of another
2 state; that applies to everything.
3 END QUOTE
4 .
6 QUOTE Mr. OCONNOR (New South Wales).-
7 Surely every person who has the suffrage-the right to vote within the Commonwealth-
8 and who lives within the Commonwealth, is a citizen of the Commonwealth, and
9 entitled to all its privileges, including the right to take part as the Commonwealth
10 provides in the framing of the laws.
11 END QUOTE
12
15 This Bill also contains a provision in favour of electors, which is altogether absent
16 from the Bill of 1891; that is, a provision for the protection of the voting right, when
17 the right has been granted, so that no adult person who, at the establishment of this
18 Constitution, or [start page 2468] at any time afterwards, acquires the right to vote for the
19 Legislative Assembly in his own colony or state can be deprived of that right by any law
20 passed by the Federal Parliament. This is a provision which was introduced at the instance
21 of the Hon. Mr. Holder; and although the matter has been the subject of complaint from
22 time to time, the instance I have cited may be appealed to as one evidence of the want of
23 foundation of accusations against this Bill on account of its alleged illiberal character.
24 END QUOTE
25
26 Let us consider the following:
27
29 QUOTE
30 Mr. HIGGINS.-According to one suggestion, you must go to the Parliament, [start page
31 984] but in most cases, if there is any question of policy involved, the consent of the
32 Governor-General in Council will be discussed in Parliament. It will be raised on motion in
33 Parliament, and it will be a matter for the parliamentary majority to support him or not.
34 Constitutionally, he will not give his consent unless he is in the majority.
35 Mr. REID.-What will be the position if the Governor-General in Council approves and
36 the Parliament disapproves?
37 Mr. HIGGINS.-I apprehend the effect will be that the Federal Parliament will be able to
38 pass a law which will over-ride this particular grant.
39 Mr. REID.-That is not the object of the amendment.
40 Mr. SYMON.-Would not the effect of your amendment be to make the Federal High
41 Court sit in judgment on an executive act of the Governor-General in Council?
42 Mr. HIGGINS.-With all respect, no. The Governor-General in Council, as the honorable
43 member knows as well as any one, has to obey the law as well as every one else.
44 Mr. SYMON.-But suppose the Governor-General in Council grants the bonus, and
45 suppose its operation derogates from freedom of trade, then the Federal High Court will sit
46 in judgment on an act of the Governor-General in Council which involves a question of
47 policy.
48 Mr. HIGGINS.-Does not the honorable member recognise that even the legislation of the
49 Federal Parliament is subject to the decision of the Federal High Court?
50 Mr. SYMON.-But not a question of executive administrative policy.
51 Mr. HIGGINS.-The Federal High Court goes still further than that. It has the function of
52 deciding whether the Acts of the Parliament are valid or not, and why should it not have
53 the function of deciding whether the acts of the Ministry are valid or not?
Page 30
1 Mr. SYMON.-That was not the intention in determining the functions of the Federal
2 High Court.
3 Mr. HIGGINS.-Our British system is that every official under Her Majesty is amenable
4 to the law-that everybody is under the law.
5 Mr. SYMON.-But this is a question of Ministerial responsibility.
6 Mr. HIGGINS.-Of course it is; but supposing the Ministry were to consent to a bonus or
7 bounty which interfered with freedom of trade, then the Federal High Court could be asked
8 to interfere, and it therefore has the ultimate decision of the matter. If the court decided
9 against a bonus or bounty, I rather think that the money would have to be refunded.
10 END QUOTE
11
12 Again
13 If the court decided against a bonus or bounty, I rather think that the money would have to
14 be refunded.
15
16 The same should be where taxation is wrongly applied!
17
18 For example,
19
20 The issue is what is your position as a Premier in this all?
21 Councils were recognised by the Framers of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
22 1900 (UK) to be “corporations” and in The Municipal of Sydney v Commonwealth 1904 the
23 High Court of Australia held that councils are a corporation and cannot legislate, however can
24 exercise “delegated” “State land taxation” where the State legislated for this. However, on 11
25 November 1910 the Commonwealth commenced to legislate as to land taxation and that means
26 the States no longer had “concurrent” legislative powers as to “land taxation” and by this neither
27 could councils then have any “delegated” land taxation powers referred to as “council rates”.
28 Because, albeit unconstitutional, the High Court of Australia denied litigants to rely upon the
29 Hansard records of the constitution convention Debates it resulted that not uncommon the High
30 Court of Australia handed down decisions that were in violation to the legal principles embedded
31 in the constitution. The States decided that the “concurrent” legislative powers somehow was
32 always applicable, at least so it appears to me, albeit this was wrong!
33
34 Meaning that the State of Victoria (and any other state for that) lacked legislative powers for
35 land taxation. This means that the State of Victoria couldn’t delegate land taxation to ‘councils”
36 where it had no legislative powers in the first place regarding land taxation. As the Framers of
37 the Constitution made very clear that any unconstitutional tax has to be refunded! Remember, the
38 States were created in Section 106 of this constitution “subject to this constitution”?
39 Despite of that the Commonwealth on 11 November 1910 commenced to legislate as to “land
40 taxation” the State of Victoria then did albeit unconstitutionally the same subsequently on 26
41 December 1910.
42
43
Page 31
1
2 There are 2 purported versions of Constitution Act for the Colony/State of Victoria however in
3 my view neither one are as such valid constitutions. The 1855 (Colonial) Constitution Act for
4 Victoria was amended by the provisions of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
5 1900 (UK) and as such by right it should have been reprinted as: Victoria State Constitution Act
6 1855 as amended by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK).
7
8
9
10 Therefore, the purported Victoria ‘Constitution Act 1975’ is not a valid constitution at all,
11 regardless having purportedly 120 amendments. It purports to be about 243 pages and the old
12 Colonial Constitution Act 1855 is about 39 pages.
13
14
15 Again:
16
17

Page 32
1 There can be absolutely no question about it that in 2001 I made clear that “state land taxation”
2 was unconstitutional and I also made clear that the “compulsory” part of voting was
3 unconstitutional! And in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka representing myself on 19 July 2006 succeeded
4 in both appeals and so UNCHALLENGED and the then Attorney-General for the State of
5 Victoria Mr rob Hulls making known to accept the courts’ decision! Res judicata!
6
7 QUOTE 20240320-Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Buloke Shire Council & Ors
8 I in 2001 decided to stand for the Federal Seat of Jagajaga and made clear that the
9 “compulsory” part of voting was unconstitutional. I also made clear that “State Land
10 Taxation (including council rates) were unconstitutional.
11 The Australian Electoral Commission subsequently charged me with FAILING TO VOTE
12 and I responded with a NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS that was also
13 served on the 9 Attorney-Generals.
14 The AEC then charged me again with FAILING TO VOTE in the 2004 federal election.
15 On 4 August 2005 the Commonwealth pursued that it relied upon “AVERMENT”. So, it
16 didn’t have to prove anything rather that I had to present evidence. I opposed this on the
17 basis also that in the (NSW) Kable case the High Court of Australia had made clear
18 Commonwealth law regarding litigation in State courts exercising federal jurisdiction
19 cannot be forced against State courts unless the State Parliament had provided for it.
20 Technically this also means that the ATO cannot rely upon “AVER” against any party as it
21 must present “evidence’ to support its litigation. However, on 17 November 2005 a
22 magistrate made known to ignore previous court orders that were in my favour and found
23 me guilty on both charges. I upon this filed appeals and succeeded in both. It must be made
24 clear, again, that neither the Commonwealth or the 9 Attorney-Generals in any way
25 challenged my appeals! The legal affect is that I successfully challenged the High Court of
26 Australia Sue v Hill alleged “Australian citizenship” being a “nationality” as well as that
27 the ATO, AEC or other federal body cannot rely upon AVERMENT. Moreover, there can
28 be no “court” where the person presiding over the case is not a “Subject of the British
29 Crown”. Any person claiming to be an “Australian citizen” as a “nationality” cannot be a
30 judicial officer and neither can therefore be sitting as a judge. Without a presiding judge
31 there can be no court!
32
33 As the High Court of Australia (again) made clear that a council (corporation) cannot
34 legislate then their so called by-laws have no constitutional validity. While the States
35 having found the referendum for councils to have failed then tried to get around this by
36 legislating that councils are a “local government” reality is that the States cannot create a
37 level of government, certainly neither a “local government” where the State Government
38 themselves are “local government and the Federal Government is the “central
39 government”.
40
41 I do not know how many land owners had been provided with an actual valuation of their
42 property that sets out precisely what was valued and not that perhaps the valuation related
43 to some other land or part of another land but wrongly included in the valuation. And, in
44 any event the valuation is a land valuation used for State Land Taxation and that clearly
45 has been unconstitutional since 11 November 1910.
46
47 QUOTE

Page 33
1
2 END QUOTE
3
4 Just consider the absurdity (without seeking to imply that State Land Taxation is valid) that
5 the State purportedly allow a council to increase by 3.50% where for example during the
6 covid scam many businesses were decimated. The same where interest rates were nearly
7 0% and yet councils are claiming 10% interest rates for any unpaid charges! What a rip off.
8 But Buloke Shire Council charges $400 for garbage collection this even so for more than a
9 decade it didn’t collect any garbage from the property! Moreover, councils were increasing
10 garbage cost for “climate change” mantra this while dumping the recycling materials with
11 the general waste and burning it with the rest of the garbage tip.
12 END QUOTE 20240320-Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Buloke Shire Council & Ors
13
14 QUOTE 20240327-Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Buloke Shire Council & Ors
15 There was a lot more, such as that constitutionally the “compulsory” part of voting was
16 unconstitutional. I understand that the Commonwealth and the Attorney-General’s made a deal
17 with the court not to issue a “Reason of Judgment” on 19 July 2006 so as to hide the truth from
18 Australians at large. By this the AEC the State Election Commissions and councils were still
19 continuing their terrorism upon electors that if they failed to vote they be ending up more than
20 likely to be convicted for FAILING TO VOTE. However, I decided to see if Artificial
21 Intelligence (AI) would know about the successful appeals and well the following responses
22 were received:
23
24 QUOTE 20240326-Are you aware that in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I on 19 July 2006 succeeded in both appeals
25 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Are+you+aware+that+in+
26 AEC+v+Schorel-Hlavka+I+on+19+July+2006+succeeded+in+both+appeals%3F
27 Are you aware that in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I on 19 July 2006 succeeded in both
28 appeals?
29
30 According to www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Questions Search Engine:
31 Yes, in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I on 19 July 2006, the defendant succeeded in both appeals.
32 Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used in Answering this Question:
331. Australian Electoral Commission (AEC)

342. Legal Database
Page 34
13. Court Records

2 Web Search Results
3 5 results
4
5 Comments:High Court of Australia dismisses appeal against conviction ...
6 https//en.m.wikinews.org › wiki ›
7 Comments:High_Court_of_Australia_dismisses_appeal_against_conviction,_compulsory_vot
8 ing
9 Comments:High Court of Australia dismisses appeal against conviction ...
10 The defendant claims that he has a right to disregard the will of the majority regarding
11 compulsory voting. I argue here that he does not. A holding to the ...
12
13 Submission-0506-Gerrit-Schorel-Hlavka.pdf
14 https//www.parliament.act.gov.au › __data › assets › pdf_file › 0009 › 1945197 › Submission-
15 0506-Gerrit-Schorel-Hlavka.pdf
16 Submission-0506-Gerrit-Schorel-Hlavka.pdf
17 On 19 July 2006 in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka County Court of Victoria, Case numbers
18 T01567737. 12. & Q10897630 (representing myself) I succeeded in ...
19
20 20190507-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Australian Electoral ...
21 https//www.scribd.com › document › 409006849 › 20190507-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-
22 to-Australian-Electoral-Commission-Re-COMPLAINTS
24 20190507-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Australian Electoral Commission Re
25 COMPLAINTS - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) ...
26
27 ELECTORAL LITIGATION
28 https//www.aph.gov.au › parliamentary_business › committees ›
29 house_of_representatives_committees
30 ELECTORAL LITIGATION
31 Injunctions. Mr Ned Kelly's application on late candidate nomination. On 22 October. 2001,
32 Mr Ned Kelly, previously known as Mr Terry Sharples, filed an.
33
34 20200719-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To The Victorian Inspectorate ...
35 https//www.scribd.com › document › 469674114 › 20200719-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
36 B-to-the-Victorian-Inspectorate-Reference-11722468
37 20200719-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To The Victorian Inspectorate ...
38 20200719-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to the Victorian Inspectorate-Reference #
39 11722468 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), ...
40 END QUOTE 20240326-Are you aware that in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I on 19 July 2006 succeeded in both
41 appeals
42
43 QUOTE 20240326-Are you aware that in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I sucessfully challenge the validity of the
44 Australian citizenship Act as being unconstitutional
45 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Are+you+aware+that+in+
46 AEC+v+Schorel-
47 Hlavka+I+sucessfully+challenge+the+validity+of+the+Australian+citizenship+Act+as+being
48 +unconstitutional%3F
49 Are you aware that in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I sucessfully challenge the validity of the
50 Australian citizenship Act as being unconstitutional?
51
Page 35
2 Yes, in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I successfully challenged the validity of the Australian

3 Citizenship Act as being unconstitutional.
51. University of South Australia (Sue Milne)

62. High Court of Australia
73. Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth)
8 The information provided in the response is based on the analysis and insights from the
9 University of South Australia’s Sue Milne regarding constitutional challenges to the stripping
10 of Australian citizenship, the rulings and decisions made by the High Court of Australia in
11 cases such as Alexander v Minister for Home Affairs, Benbrika v Minister for Home Affairs,
12 and Jones v Commonwealth, as well as the provisions and amendments outlined in the
13 Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth).
15 5 results
16
17 Constitutional challenges to the stripping of Australian citizenship
18 https//globalcit.eu › constitutional-challenges-to-the-stripping-of-australian-citizenship-an-
19 update
20 Constitutional challenges to the stripping of Australian citizenship
21 In Alexander, the High Court held the revocation of citizenship for dis-allegiant conduct
22 (foreign incursions and recruitment) unconstitutional ...
23
25 https//www.scribd.com › document › 409006849 › 20190507-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-
26 to-Australian-Electoral-Commission-Re-COMPLAINTS
28 46 Electoral Act 1918 being unconstitutional. 47 48 The quotations are reproduced with any
29 typing error as was in the original documentation ...
30
31 Australian Citizenship Amendment (Citizenship Repudiation) Bill 2023
32 https//www.aph.gov.au › Parliamentary_Business › Bills_Legislation › bd › bd2324a › 24bd36
33 Australian Citizenship Amendment (Citizenship Repudiation) Bill 2023
34 Key points. The purpose of the Bill is to amend the Australian Citizenship Act 2007 to repeal
35 the current citizenship cessation provisions ...
36
37 Constitutional cases: October 2022
38 https//www.ags.gov.au › sites › default › files › 2022-10 ›
39 Constitutional%20cases%20_Oct%2022.pdf
Page 36
1 Constitutional cases: October 2022

2 Steward J dissenting) held that s 36B of the Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth)
3 (Citizenship Act) is invalid because it infringes Ch III of the ...
4
5 Intelligence and Security Committee to review new citizenship ...
6 https//www.aph.gov.au › About_Parliament › House_of_Representatives ›
7 About_the_House_News › Media_Releases ›
8 Intelligence_and_Security_Committee_to_review_new_citizenship_repudiation_law
9 Intelligence and Security Committee to review new citizenship ...
10 The review provides the opportunity to examine the operation, effectiveness and implications
11 of the new citizenship repudiation regime, as well ...
12 END QUOTE 20240326-Are you aware that in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I sucessfully challenge the validity of
13 the Australian citizenship Act as being unconstitutional
14
15 Let us now go to the “State land tax” issue, including alleged delegated “State land taxation”
16 referred to as “council rates”, and do notice:
17
18 QUOTE
19 No, it is not possible for the States to have legislative powers regarding land taxation
20 returned to them if the Constitution does not provide for such a mechanism to
21 transfer exclusive Commonwealth power back to the States. The Australian
22 Constitution clearly outlines the division of powers between the Commonwealth and
23 the States, and any changes or transfers of powers would require formal amendments
24 to the Constitution through specific processes outlined in Section 128.
25 END QUOTE
26 And
27 QUOTE
28 Any assertion that States could unilaterally reclaim legislative authority over land
29 taxation without a constitutional amendment would be legally unfounded and
30 contrary to the established framework of federalism in Australia. Therefore, unless
31 there is a formal amendment to the Constitution or a change in legislation at the
32 federal level, States do not have the authority to independently control land taxation.
33 In summary, based on the existing constitutional framework and principles of
34 federalism in Australia, it is not feasible for States to regain legislative powers over
35 land taxation without proper constitutional amendments or legal mechanisms.
36 END QUOTE
37 END QUOTE 20240327-Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Buloke Shire Council & Ors
38
40 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-
41 The record of these debates may fairly be expected to be widely read, and the
42 observations to which I allude might otherwise lead to a certain amount of
43 misconception.
44 END QUOTE
45
46 I received on 8-3-2011 a response dated 2-3-2011 from Barry Collier MP Parliamentary
47 Secretary Assisting the Treasurer on behalf of the Treasurer he responded.
48 Section 107 he refers to is very clear that for example “Income Tax” albeit was a Colonial and
49 later State legislative power the moment the Commonwealth legislated upon “Income Tax” then
50 the power became an exclusive Commonwealth power and the States had to retire from this.
51 Once it became an exclusive power then the constitution doesn’t permit it to return to become a
52 “concurrent” power, as I have set out in past correspondence. The legislative powers on the
53 particular field is forever an exclusive power of the Commonwealth!
Page 37
1 In regard of the State Land Taxes the same applies. Once the Commonwealth commenced to
2 legislate as to “Land taxes” then it became by this an exclusive legislative power and as such the
3 State no longer had concurrent legislative powers on Land taxes matters.
4 The States were created out of the former colonies and as s.106 of the (federal) constitution
5 makes clear “subject to this constitution” and this clearly provides in s51 for concurrent
6 legislative powers to become exclusive Commonwealth legislative powers. It is not relevant if
7 the Commonwealth, as like with the 1952 abolition land taxes were to abolish “income tax”
8 because it would still remain an exclusive Commonwealth legislative power. As for s5 of the
9 Constitution Act 1992 (NSW) it cannot override any Commonwealth exclusive powers and as it
10 clearly is subject to the Commonwealth constitution it therefore cannot be perceived it somehow
11 gives legislative powers no longer permissible by the Commonwealth Constitution to be
12 exercisable by a state.
13
14 .
15 Critical might be the claim:
16 QUOTE
17 Land taxes were imposed by the States prior to federation. They were introduced at the
18 federal level in 1910. In 1952, the Commonwealth Government abolished land tax. This
19 did not have the effect of preventing the States from imposing land tax, but rather returned
20 taxation powers back to them. Accordingly, the NSW Government introduced the land
21 Management Act in 1956.
22 END QUOTE
Page 38
1 Obviously, contrary to what was claimed by Barry Collier MP the Commonwealth Government
2 has no constitutional powers to abolish any legislation as it being the Executive it can refuse to
3 enforce legislative provisions but cannot abolish an act of Parliament. As such it is the
4 Commonwealth Parliament that can only abolish legislation.
5 What may be noted is the wording “but rather returned taxation powers back to them” as
6 such this is a concession that in fact since 1910 land taxes were an exclusive Commonwealth
7 legislative power. The question then is how does one “return” a legislative power to any State,
8 not just NSW, where the Constitution never provided for this? Clearly Barry Collier MP didn’t
9 clarifyy within what constitutional powers, if any, a reversal of legislative power could eventuate
10 and quite frankly the Framers of the Constitution made clear that once a legislative power was a
11 Commonwealth legislative power then this was the end of the States dealing with the subject.
12 .
13 Hansard 27-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
14 Australasian Convention)
15 QUOTE
16 Mr. DEAKIN.-My point is that by the requests of different colonies at different times you may arrive at a
17 position in which all the colonies have adopted a particular law, and it is necessary for the working of that
18 law that certain fees, charges, or taxation should be imposed. That law now relates to the whole of the
19 Union, because every state has come under it. As I read clause 52, the Federal Parliament will have no
20 power, until the law has thus become absolutely federal, to impose taxation to provide the necessary
21 revenue for carrying out that law. Another difficulty of the sub-section is the question whether, even
22 when a state has referred a matter to the federal authority, and federal legislation takes place on it, it
23 has any-and if any, what-power of amending or repealing the law by which it referred the question? I
24 should be inclined to think it had no such power, but the question has been raised, and should be
25 settled. I should say that, having appealed to Caesar, it must be bound by the judgment of Caesar, and
26 that it would not be possible for it afterwards to revoke its reference.
27 END QUOTE
28 .
30 QUOTE Mr. GORDON.-
31 The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes on
32 the Constitution we will have to wipe it out."
33 END QUOTE
34 .
36 QUOTE Mr. ISAACS (Victoria).-
37 In the next sub-section it is provided that all taxation shall be uniform throughout the Commonwealth.
38 An income tax or a property tax raised under any federal law must be uniform "throughout the
39 Commonwealth." That is, in every part of the Commonwealth.
40 END QUOTE
41 .
43 QUOTE
44 Mr. MCMILLAN: I think the reading of the sub-section is clear.
45 The reductions may be on a sliding scale, but they must always be uniform.
46 END QUOTE
47 And
49 QUOTE
50 Sir GEORGE TURNER: No. In imposing uniform duties of Customs it should not be
51 necessary for the Federal Parliament to make them commence at a certain amount at once.
52 We have pretty heavy duties in Victoria, and if the uniform tariff largely reduces them at
53 once it may do serious injury to the colony. The Federal Parliament will have power to
54 fix the uniform tariff, and if any reductions made are on a sliding scale great injury
55 will be avoided.
56 END QUOTE
57 .

Page 39

3 But it is a fair corollary to the provision for dealing with the revenue for the first five years
4 after the imposition of uniform duties of customs, and further reflection has led me to the
5 conclusion that, on the whole, it will be a useful and beneficial provision.
6 END QUOTE
7 And
10 On the other hand, the power of the Commonwealth to impose duties of customs and of
11 excise such as it may determine, which insures that these duties of customs and excise
12 would represent something like the average opinion of the Commonwealth-that power, and
13 the provision that bounties are to be uniform throughout the Commonwealth, might, I
14 am willing to concede, be found to work with some hardship upon the states for some
15 years, unless their own rights to give bounties were to some extent preserved.
16 END QUOTE
17
19 QUOTE Sir SAMUEL GRIFFITH:
20 2. Customs and excise and bounties, but so that duties of customs and excise and bounties
21 shall be uniform throughout the commonwealth, and that no tax or duty shall be imposed
22 on any goods exported from one state to another;
23 END QUOTE
24
26 QUOTE The CHAIRMAN.-
27 Taxation; but so that all taxation shall he uniform throughout the Commonwealth, and
28 that no tax or duty shall be imposed on any goods passing from one state to another.
29 END QUOTE
30 .
32 QUOTE
33 Mr. BARTON.-I am saying now that I do not think there is any necessity for clause 95
34 in its present form. What I am saying however, is that it should be made certain that in the
35 same way as you provide that the Tariff or any taxation imposed shall be uniform
36 throughout the Commonwealth, so it should be provided with reference to trade and
37 commerce that it shall be uniform and equal, so that the Commonwealth shall not give
38 preference to any state or part of a state. Inasmuch as we provide that all taxation,
39 whether it be customs or excise duties, or direct taxation, must be uniform, and
40 inasmuch as we follow the United States Constitution in that particular-in the very same
41 way I argue that we should protect the trade and commerce sub-section by not doing
42 anything which will limit its effect. That is the real logical position.
43 END QUOTE
44 .
46 QUOTE
47 Mr. ISAACS (Victoria).-What I am going to say may be a little out of order, but I would
48 like to draw the Drafting Committee's attention to the fact that in clause 52, sub-section
49 (2), there has been [start page 1856] a considerable change. Two matters in that sub-section
50 seem to me to deserve attention. First, it is provided that all taxation shall be uniform
51 throughout the Commonwealth. That means direct as well as indirect taxation, and
52 the object I apprehend is that there shall be no discrimination between the states; that
53 an income tax or land tax shall not be made higher in one state than in another. I
54 should like the Drafting Committee to consider whether saying the tax shall be uniform
55 would not prevent a graduated tax of any kind? A tax is said to be uniform that falls with
Page 40
1 the same weight on the same class of property, wherever it is found. It affects all kinds of
2 direct taxation. I am extremely afraid, that if we are not very careful, we shall get into a
3 difficulty. It might not touch the question of exemption; but any direct tax sought to
4 be imposed might be held to be unconstitutional, or, in other words, illegal, if it were
5 not absolutely uniform.
6 END QUOTE
7 .
8 It should be clear that a “UNIFORM” law under the Commonwealth cannot somehow revert
9 back to a non-uniform law merely because of the States desiring to pursue their own kind of land
10 taxation. As such, on this basis also the State land taxes are floored (and so also any Territorial
11 land taxes).
12 .
14 QUOTE
15 Mr. ISAACS.-The court would not consider whether it was an oversight or not.
16 They would take the law and ask whether it complied with the Constitution. If it did
17 not, they would say that it was invalid. They would not go into the question of what was
18 in the minds of the Members of Parliament when the law was passed. That would be a
19 political question which it would be impossible for the court to determine.
20 END QUOTE
21 .
22 As I previously indicated the Commonwealth could have allowed the States to collect under its
23 authority land taxes but it still would have to be uniform through the Commonwealth and as such
24 all States and Territories (quasi States) would be bound to have the same land taxes application
25 and not different rates. This then would clearly be a waste of exercise as why allow different
26 States/Territories to collect taxes when one federal office can do the same?
27 The issue then is of the Commonwealth somehow could enact legislation to retrospective provide
28 for legislation for the States/Territories to have collected land taxes on its behalf. Again, the first
29 hurdle is that retrospective legislation would be invalid where so to say it makes the conduct of a
30 honest man to be a criminal conduct. Further, where the States raised different levels of land
31 taxes then it cannot be uniform. One couldn’t accept that a person of one State having paid less
32 then in another State now suddenly was to pay more by some kind of retrospective legislation
33 and neither that some who paid more now were going to receive a refund of any land taxes paid
34 above that of other States. After all commercial entities are based upon overhead cost, including
35 land taxes, etc, and as such a business enterprise might be determined where the lowest taxation
36 is available. Changing the system after the contracts are already in operation would make a
37 mockery of the reliability of State provisions.
38
39 Despite of that the Commonwealth on 11 November 1910 commenced to legislate as to “land
40 taxation” the State of Victoria then did albeit unconstitutionally the same subsequently on 26
41 December 1910.
42
43 QUOTE 20240325-0114-20240325-Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting
44 the Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011 claimed
45 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Are+you+aware+that+Bar
46 ry+Collier+MP+Parliamentarian+Secretary+Assisting+the+Treasurer+NSW+on+2+March+2
47 011+claimed+%28to+me%29+that+the+States+had+legislative+powers+regarding+land+tax
48 ation+returned+to+them%3F+Do+you+accept+this+is+possible+when+the+constitution+doe
49 sn’t+provide+for+this+mechanism+to+return+exclusive+Commonwealth+power+back+to+th
50 e+States%3F
51

Page 41
1 Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the
2 Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011 claimed (to me) that the States had legislative powers
3 regarding land taxation returned to them? Do you accept this is possible when the
4 constitution doesn’t provide for this mechanism to return exclusive Commonwealth
5 power back to the States?
6
8 Answer:
9 No, it is not possible for the States to have legislative powers regarding land taxation returned
10 to them if the Constitution does not provide for such a mechanism to transfer exclusive
11 Commonwealth power back to the States. The Australian Constitution clearly outlines the
12 division of powers between the Commonwealth and the States, and any changes or transfers
13 of powers would require formal amendments to the Constitution through specific processes
14 outlined in Section 128.
15 The Australian Constitution establishes a federal system of government where certain powers
16 are allocated exclusively to the Commonwealth Parliament under Section 51, including
17 taxation. Land taxation falls under this category of powers exclusively vested in the
18 Commonwealth. While there are provisions for concurrent powers and areas where both
19 levels of government can legislate, matters related to land taxation are generally within the
20 domain of the Commonwealth.
21 Any assertion that States could unilaterally reclaim legislative authority over land taxation
22 without a constitutional amendment would be legally unfounded and contrary to the
23 established framework of federalism in Australia. Therefore, unless there is a formal
24 amendment to the Constitution or a change in legislation at the federal level, States do not
25 have the authority to independently control land taxation.
26 In summary, based on the existing constitutional framework and principles of federalism in
27 Australia, it is not feasible for States to regain legislative powers over land taxation without
28 proper constitutional amendments or legal mechanisms.
30 Australian Constitution
31 Legal Principles of Federalism in Australia
32 Division of Powers between Commonwealth and States
33 These sources were consulted to provide accurate information on the distribution of
34 legislative powers in Australia’s federal system and how changes or transfers of such powers
35 would need to adhere to constitutional provisions.
37 5 results
38
39 Barry Collier (politician)
40 https//en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki › Barry_Collier_(politician)
42 He was a Labor Party member of the New South Wales Legislative Assembly from 1999 to
43 2011 and from 2013 to 2015, representing the electorate of Miranda.
44
45 Department of the Legislative Assembly - Parliament of NSW
46 https//www.parliament.nsw.gov.au › la › department › Documents › department-of-the-
47 legislative-assembly-annual-report-for-2009-2010 ›
48 LA%20Annual%20Report%20200910.pdf
50 parliamentary recess between december 2010 and the march 2011 election should provide
51 staffing resources to complete some of these projects.
Page 42
1
2 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
3 https//api.parliament.nsw.gov.au › api › hansard › search › daily › pdf › HANSARD-
4 1820781676-64586
5 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
6 Road Transport (Vehicle Registration) Amendment (Heavy Vehicle Registration Charges)
7 Bill 2009. State Revenue Legislation Amendment (Defence Force ...
8
9 Committee Secretary 5-6-2011 Joint ...
10 https//www.aph.gov.au › parliamentary_business › committees ›
11 house_of_representatives_committees
13 This did not have the effect of preventing the. States from imposing land tax, but rather
14 returned taxation powers back to them. Accordingly ...
15
16 House of Representatives Official Hansard
17 https//citeseerx.ist.psu.edu › document
18 House of Representatives Official Hansard
19 House of Representatives Officeholders. Speaker—The Hon. David Peter Maxwell Hawker
20 MP. Deputy Speaker—The Hon. Ian Raymond Causley MP.
21 END QUOTE 20240325-0114-20240325-Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary
22 Assisting the Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011 claimed
23
24 It should be clear that AI agreed that the States since 11 November 1910 had no “concurrent”
25 legislative powers as to State land taxation and it would require a Section 128 referendum to
26 amend the constitution for the States to regain State land taxation legislative powers.
27 AI also agreed that I had succeeded in the appeals on numerous grounds, albeit it did not refer to
28 all issues then before the court.
29 This means to me that “Council(s)” has/have no legal standing as to pursue any alleged
30 “delegated” “State land taxation” referred to as “council rates”.
31 While in my view councils can legitimately charge for garbage collection, provided they actual
32 do so) but only as a corporation and not some purported “local government’.
33
34 Can a “council” claim to be a “local government”? Absolutely not, this as regardless what the
35 State Parliament may have legislated about it cannot override the constitution which created the
36 State within Section 106 “subject to this constitution”, and this constitution doesn’t provide for
37 a second level of “local government” which the state government itself already is.
38
39 Getting back to the (State) Victorian Constitution Act 1855 (UK) it must be clear that while the
40 Victorian Parliament was prior to federation a “sovereign parliament” that could amend the
41 (colonial) Victorian Constitution Act 1855 (UK) upon federation the colonial Parliament
42 became a “constitutional parliament” and no longer could amend the (State) Victorian
43 Constitution Act 1855 (UK). It means that any and all amendments to the the (State) Victorian
44 Constitution Act 1855 (UK) since 1 January 1901 had to be approved by State referendum.
45 Likewise, so with any and all other states. Meaning, that for example the purported 2001
46 Queensland Constitution Act is neither a valid Constitution Act not having been approved by the
47 state electors by way of State referendum!
48
49 There is a purported Victorian Constitution Act 1975 (Vic) however, there never was any such
50 legislative powers for the Victorian government to unilaterally dispose of the United Kingdom

Page 43
1 Constitution Act! Therefore, this act of TREASON by Members of Parliament to purport there
2 was a purported Victorian Constitution Act 1975 cannot be deemed valid legislation whatsoever!
3
4 Much has been claimed that the FOI Act doesn’t apply to the Office of the ‘premier’. Well,
5 constitutionally electors are entitled to information in regard of which politicians engage using
6 taxpayers monies.
7
9 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
10 What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious
11 liberty-the liberty and the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably
12 aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in this Constitution, which is also a charter of
13 peace-of peace, order, and good government for the whole of the peoples whom it will
14 embrace and unite.
15 END QUOTE
16 And
18 QUOTE
19 Mr. SYMON (South Australia).- We who are assembled in this Convention are about to
20 commit to the people of Australia a new charter of union and liberty; we are about to
21 commit this new Magna Charta for their acceptance and confirmation, and I can
22 conceive of nothing of greater magnitude in the whole history of the peoples of the
23 world than this question upon which we are about to invite the peoples of Australia to
24 vote. The Great Charter was wrung by the barons of England from a reluctant king. This
25 new charter is to be given by the people of Australia to themselves.
26 END QUOTE
27
28 Whenever the Government of the Day uses taxpayers’ monies then taxpayers are entitled to have
29 all and any information in which the government engages in. After all, not to provide the
30 information undermines the rights of electors to make an ‘informed decision’ to know who to
31 vote for.
32 Any FOI Act (FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT) provision never can undermine the rights
33 of taxpayers and electors to know upon what basis any taxation was used.
34 For example, the “hotel fiasco” issue the relevant details are NOT and NEVER WERE to
35 property of whomever was/is the Premier or any other office holder, as they belong to the
36 residents of the state, the taxpayers.
37 Obviously, where as set out above there is no such thing as a valid ‘Victorian Constitution Act
38 1975’ (and about 120 purported amendments) then all and any purported amendments to this
39 purported Constitution Act are invalid without any legal basis.
40 We then have to look at for example the number of members of parliament in the Victorian
41 Parliament as is provided for in the (State) Victorian Constitution Act 1855 (UK) and then how
42 many purported Members of the Victorian Parliament are actually unconstitutionally sitting in
43 the Victorian Parliament.
44
45 I did via email lodge a complaint (With numerous supplements) to the Australian Federal Police
46 regarding the elaborate “covid scam” and exposed the misinformation/disinformation pushed by
47 the various Australian governments including their Departments such as the TGA, Department of
48 health, etc.
49 More over, I lodged on 8 April 2020 a complaint with the Victorian Ombudsman as well as on
50 13 April 2020 a complaint with the Victorian Human rights Commissioner. The Victorian
51 Ombudsman referred the matter to IBAC which on 19 April 2020 held it was not in the “public
52 interest’. Well, tell that to the many who became the victim of the FAKE “covid-19 vaccine” that
Page 44
1 was an unconstitutional “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION” bioweapon” specifically designed to

2 mass murder people around the world.
3
4 QUOTE 20240126-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Julie Inman-Grant, Office of the eSafety
5 Commissioner
6 Julie Inman-Grant, 26-1-2024
7 Office of the eSafety Commissioner
8 [email protected]
10 Madam,
11 it appears to me you may misunderstand your position as a public servant on the pay roll
12 of Australian taxpayers. Regardless who might be in government (politically) your obligations at
13 all times is to serve the interest and wellbeing of all Australians, not just some selective few, and
14 within the bounds of the legal principles embedded in the Commonwealth of Australiaq
15 Constitution Act 1900 (UK).
16
17
18
19 https://sxswsydney.com/speaker/julie-inman-grant/
20 QUOTE (part added with red colour, bolding and underlind)
21 About
22 Julie Inman Grant is Australia’s eSafety Commissioner, leading the world’s first
23 government regulatory agency committed to keeping its citizens safer online. In this role,
24 Julie has launched the global Safety by Design initiative and led work to stand up novel
25 and world-first regulatory regimes under the new Online Safety Act 2021, with
26 implementation of a sweeping new set of online safety reforms.
27
28 Before commencing as eSafety Commissioner in January 2017, Julie spent two decades
29 working in senior public policy and safety roles in the tech industry. She served as one of
30 Microsoft’s first and longest-standing government relations professionals, ultimately in the
31 role of Global Director for Safety & Privacy Policy and Outreach. At Twitter, she set up
32 and drove the company’s policy, safety and philanthropy programs across Australia, New
33 Zealand and Southeast Asia.
34
35 As Commissioner, Julie also plays an important global role as Chair of the Child Dignity
36 Alliance’s Technical Working Group and Board Member of the WePROTECT Global
37 Alliance, She serves on the World Economic Forum’s Global Coalition for Digital Safety
38 and on their XR Ecosystem Governance Steering Committee on Building and Defining the
39 Metaverse.
40 END QUOTE
41
42 Again:
43
44 QUOTE

Page 45
1 She serves on the World Economic Forum’s Global Coalition for Digital Safety and
2 on their XR Ecosystem Governance Steering Committee on Building and Defining the
3 Metaverse.
4 END QUOTE
5
6 This latter in my view means you are essentially working with a foreign (enemy) power and this
7 then invalidate the position you purport to be holding. I contemplate to set out some of it below
8 but more is extensively canvassed at my blog https://www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati. This blog
9 latterly well since the Voice referendum was proposed has been subjected to “shadow banning”.
10 Obviously for legal purposes I often make screen print of this as to be able to prove I am shadow
11 banned.
12 END QUOTE 20240126-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Julie Inman-Grant, Office of the eSafety
13 Commissioner
14
15 QUOTE 20230728-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl 101F-
16 DEMOCIDE 2.0
17 1974/12/10 – Secretary of State Henry Kissenger’s national
18 Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) study
19 completed as the Kissinger Report, establishing global
20 depopulation as US geopolitical strategy.
21
22
23 1975/11/26 – President Gerald Ford endorsed the Kissinger Report’s depopulation plan
24 through National Security Decision Memorandum 314
25
26
27 Let us first therefore look at the (USA) DoD DEPOPULATION plan:
28
29 Let us look as Deagel.com (http://www.deagel.com/country/forecast.aspx) population forecast
30 of 2017 and in particular, the current countries hit with COVID-19!
31
32 Name Country 2017 2025 Reduction %
33
34 United Kingdom 65,650,000 14,517,860 51,132,140 77.886%
35 Ireland 5,010,000 1,318,740 3,691,260 73.678%
36 Germany 80,590,000 28,134,920 52,455,080 65.089%
37 Spain 48,960,000 27,763,280 21,196,720 43.294%
38
39 France 67,100,000 39,114,580 27,985,420 41.707%
40 Switzerland 8,240,000 5,342,540 2,897,460 35.163%
41 Denmark 5,600,000 3,771,760 1,828,240 32.647%
42 Belgium 11,490,000 8,060,900 3,429,100 29.844%
43
44 Italy 62,140,000 43,760,260 18,379,740 29.578%
45 Austria 8,750,000 6,215,000 2,535,000 28.971%
46 Ukraine 44,030,000 31,628,980 12,401,020 28.165%
47 Norway 5,320,000 3,833,960 1,486,040 27.933%
48
49 Portugal 10,840,000 8,113,860 2,726,140 25.149%
Page 46
1 Poland 38,480,000 33,230,780 5,249,220 13.641%

2
3 TOTALS 462,200,000 254,807,420 207,392,580 44.871%
4
5 United States of America 326,620,000 99,553,100 227,066,900 69.520%
6
7 Australia 23,230,000 15,196,600 8,033,400 34.582%
8
9 And to silence critics they went on to pay handsomely the media (albeit also unconstitutionally)
10 as I understood was what Event201 October 2019 was indicating, as to prevent others to become
11 aware of their murderous DEPOPULATION scam. The eSafety Commissioner, Ombudsman,
12 Human Rights Commissioners were simploy AWOL (Absent Without Leave) and if anything
13 not just refused to enforce constitutional rights but rather supported this TREASONOUS
14 conduct and let DICTATORSHIP & TERRORISM be the rule of the day.
15 END QUOTE 20230728-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl
16 101F- DEMOCIDE 2.0
17
18 Actually, it was exposed that the covid-19 alleged vaccine was actually a “gene therapy”
19 DEPOPULATION bioweapon jab with ownership of the DoD (US of A) and some batched
20 were more deadlier then others. It wasn’t the alleged covid-19 virus, but rather the alleged covid-
21 19 vaccinations that was as I understand was the cause of most deaths around the world!
22 I may not be a medical doctor or a scientist but then again I quoted the publications of scientist &
23 medical doctors extensively as well as court decisions at my blog underlining that it was a
24 gigantic murderous covid-19 scam!
25 If the expert witness had claimed that the Tooth Fairy had made clear that covid-19 existed
26 would you then have accepted it as being reasonable evidence to be relied upon? I do not think
27 so! Then why accept the covid-19 claim that to my understanding never has been isolated and
28 purified according to the Koch postulate?
29
30 Again:
31
32 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
33 Australasian Convention)
34 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
35 What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious
36 liberty-the liberty and the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably
37 aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in this Constitution, which is also a charter of
38 peace-of peace, order, and good government for the whole of the peoples whom it will
39 embrace and unite.
40 END QUOTE
41
42 I understand that the now Governor of Queensland was as Chief Medical Officer interfering with
43 the rights of Australians to post items on the internet by requesting Big Tech to prevent certain
44 postings, which I view clearly was unconstitutional as it interfered with both the constitutional
45 embedded legal principles political liberty and religious liberty.
46
47 My concern is that your judgment may be used to try to circumvent constitutional rights such as
48 that of Queenslanders. And as a great grandfather of one of my great grandchildren living in
49 Queensland I am very concerned as to the denial of rights of any one of my descendants!
50
51 Again:
52

Page 47
1
2
3 And then also:
4
5
6
7 Well, my blog may just show that one doesn’t have to be a scientist/medical doctor to discover it
8 was a gigantic scam. Why indeed did Big Tech (on request of the various governments) deny the
9 publications by numerous scientist/medical doctors who since 2020 exposed the scam, when in
10 the end those scientist/medical doctor after all proved to be right? As in the Colosimo case I
11 wasn’t going to disprove the medical conclusions on medical grounds, rather than on a legal
12 basis those medical conclusions had no validity.
13
14 The Department of Health (Cth) claimed from onset that the (alleged) covid-19 vaccination
15 could not affect DNA, whereas I published contrary scientific/medical conclusions and it proved
16 that it does affect DNA! In the end, as was exposed that there were undisclosed ingredients
17 (chemicals, etc) in the so called covid-19 vaccines which apparently the TGA never detected,
18 allegedly, that had serious health complications to those who had been jabbed, including certain
19 strange clothes discovered in numerous dead bodies in the arteries, etc.
20
21 I have absolutely no doubt that more than likely those expert witnesses who gave evidence
22 before you may likely never have referred to the following “the Thing” issue which turned out
23 to be like the blood cloths discovered by morticians around the world, since the so called covid-
24 19 vaccinations commenced!
25
26 QUOTE 20221214-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl 93 -
27 Part 10- electors-candidates-covid scam, etc
28 https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/why-strange-clots-form-after-mrna-jabs-treatments-to-
29 consider_4914851.html?utm_source=healthnoe&src_src=healthnoe&utm_campaign=health-2022-12-
30 13&src_cmp=health-2022-12-
31 13&utm_medium=email&est=B6L9dTbk8LXHClTcGIe6kBgd5nldXCU46qjz3CXoz%2ByYiigHnHXqy8srtscRKa
32 JxVHGO6mkJbsd%2F
33 Why Strange Clots Form After mRNA Jabs, Treatments to Consider
34 QUOTE
35 However, the COVID vaccines are still made based on the original Wuhan strain and are
36 causing many clotting problems.
37 Most of the virus-derived S protein likely remains in the respiratory tract. In contrast,
38 vaccine-induced S protein production occurs in internal organs and tissues (thus exerting
39 systemic effects).
40 END QUOTE
Page 48
1 And
2 QUOTE
3 Research on COVID vaccines is mostly limited to serological analysis—antibodies
4 produced after injection.
5 However, beyond the analysis of immune responses, understanding the safety profile of
6 those vaccines in humans is mandatory to ensure their safety, maintain a trusted health
7 system, and protect public safety.
8 Multiple lines of preclinical evidence and clinical observations as a whole support a causal
9 link between the spike protein-based COVID-19 vaccine and reported abnormal white or
10 brown fibrous clots.
11 These abnormal clots block the blood vessels and cause significant clinical outcomes,
12 including heart attack, stroke, and pulmonary embolism, which could contribute to the
13 reported sudden death cases in vaccinated people.
14 There are still unknowns in the pathogenesis of these clots. However, avoiding the
15 vaccine and promoting autophagy to clear the toxic protein from our bodies is
16 certainly the top priority.
17 END QUOTE
18 And
19 QUOTE My own post upon the article
20 inspector_rikati
21 The article didn’t refer to Dr Franc Zalewski Is “The thing” hydra vulgaris?
22 https://www.bitchute.com/video/SCnaAI3fLL5B/ which would explain an alternative why
23 only vaccinated people end up with those non-blood cloths.
24 END QUOTE
25 END QUOTE 20221214-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl
26 93 -Part 10- electors-candidates-covid scam, etc
27
28 QUOTE 20211028-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the Australian
29 Federal Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-25-CHECKMATE
30 https://streamable.com/h881fu video
31 https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/2/frontlinenews/immunization-expert-unvaccinated-people-
32 are-not-dangerous-vaccinated-people-are-dangerous-for-others/
33 QUOTE
34 Confirming the rapidly deteriorating situation in Israel and the UK, the infectious disease
35 expert stated: “Vaccinated people should be put in quarantine, and should be isolated
36 from the society.”
37 END QUOTE
38
39 I have never been a person who desired to watch science fiction movies of humans being
40 possessed by aliens. Other then happen to see some clips (that happened to be shown during
41 some television advertising) I basically stayed clear from it all. However, now we may ask
42 ourselves if we now have reached that “aliens” (“The Thing”) are perhaps now taking over the
43 human race.
44
45 Again:
46 https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/14/11/2227/htm
47 Empirical Data Confirm Autism Symptoms Related to Aluminum and ...
48 Indeed, there are no known life forms that utilize aluminum in any ... reduce the
49 amount of mercury present in vaccines beginning in the late 1990's [58].
50 And now:
51 https://www.bitchute.com/video/mjY3ZfmbqH9y/
52 16.10.21 Dr Franc Zalewski Interview, Aluminum Carbon Organism ...

Page 49
1 17 Oct 2021 ... New Update (16.10.2021) from Dr Franc Zalewski where he shares
2 additional commentary and thoughts on The Thing / Parasite / Organism ...
3
4 https://www.bitchute.com/video/dWs7yO1xWK7R/
5 aluminium-based lifeforms found in vaccines under microscope
6 12 Oct 2021 ... ALUMINIUM-BASED LIFEFORMS FOUND IN VACCINES UNDER
7 MICROSCOPE - DR FRANC ZALEWSKI - ENGLISH.
8
9 https://everydayconcerned.net/2021/10/11/more-sickening-covid-vaccine-findings-dr-
10 franc-zalewski-finds-aluminium-lifeform-tentacled-parasite-in-pfizer-vaccine-vaccine-
11 parasites-found-in-vaccinated-blood-causing-blood-clots-heart-iss/
12 More Sickening COVID Vaccine Findings: Dr. Franc Zalewski Finds ...
13 11 Oct 2021 ... Franc Zalewski Finds “Aluminium Lifeform” Tentacled Parasite in Pfizer
14 Vaccine; Vaccine Parasites Found in Vaccinated Blood, Causing Blood Clots ...
15
16 https://vk.com/video-198462752_456240030
17 Aluminium-based Lifeforms Found in "vaccines".. — Видео
18 ВКонтакте – универсальное средство для общения и поиска друзей и
19 одноклассников, которым ежедневно пользуются десятки миллионов человек.
20
21 https://humansarefree.com/2021/10/polish-doctor-claims-he-found-a-life-form-in-the-
22 pfizer-comirnaty-shot.html
23 Polish Doctor Claims He Found a LIFE FORM in the Pfizer ...
24 14 Oct 2021 ... Another strange COVID vaccine life form has been discovered under the
25 microscope. It is yet another tentacled creature – and an aluminium-based ...
26
27 Let us now then consider the issue of if something was discovered in any vials?
28 I am not claiming I accurately transcribed everything but tried my best.
29 Image number refers to my screenprint image)
30 START MY TRANSCRIBING
31 Dr Franc Zalewski
32
33 First CV Sample:
34 And here we can see a hole (because graphite tape used as a surface)
35
36 I noticed a lot of crystals, but some so “aggressive” that even the graphine melted
37 somewhat
38
39 And I thought I found something
40
41 Of course I conducted tests and it turned out to be salt
42
43 this fluid turned out to be a saline solution
44
45 Nothing else inside
46 So I continued… so in the first sample there was nothing found, everything dried up, and
47 even the salt couldn’t be noticed anymore… so the composition of the fluid varies
48

Page 50
1
2 (image 1967)
3 Second CV Sample:
4 In the second sample I found a lot of crystals
5
6
7 (image 1970)
8 And here we can see the results: They consist of sodium (Na) and chloride (Cl). This is
9 what we call regular cooking salt
10
11 So the fluid contains only a saline solution
12
13 But I was searching for something else, and as always I have found something
14
15 And I found this:
16
17
18
Page 51
1 (Image 1979 & 1980)

2 This is what I found: “The Thing”
3
4 Where is my marker? We need to write “that something” down with big and bold letters
5
6 I continued my studies, and conducted tests. What is that thing?
7
8 It seems to have a head and three legs
9
10 I conducted tests, oif the4 head(1) and (2),(3),(4) abnd those are the results:
11
12 It’s aluminium and carbon
13
14 …excuse me, I got my tool
15
16 “THE THING”
17
18 The faint-hearted ones may leave the room
19
20 No, without jokes
21
22 The results of the following testst are: aluminium, bromine, and carbon
23
24 That means that “something” has it’s legs in different colors
25
26 Here we have the test results of that “thing”
27
28
29 (image 2022)
30 This is 1/10th of it. If the head here is 2mm , then the legs/tapes are 25 m
31
32 The head 2mm, and the tapes 25m
33
34 Like that
35
36 And I’m thinking: “What kind of being is that?”
37
38 Is “the thing” something like this creature with claws that kills people?
39
40 Or somrthing that is shown in “The Matrix” that flies, and has tentacles, and attaches itself
41 to other things?
42
43 No
Page 52
2
3 (image 2040)
4 “That thing” is this here
5
6 Here you haqve it on the photo
7
8 Cov - 19 Vaks-!ne
9
10 Welcome friends
11
12
13 (image 2051)
14 This is “The Thing” which I tested in those samples
15
16 Yes? Shocked?
17
18 “that thing” is being given to people in the vaks-!nes, but in eggs. I was searching for it’s
19 eggs
20
21 And they should have suitable environment
22
23 If the injection is tested on a bare dish, nothing happens, and the eggs couldn’t be found.
24 Perhaps they weren’t inside the injection, because some of them are pure saline solutions
25
26 But if tested on a graphite tape…That’s why there’s grapheme added inside the Vaks-!nes
27 which nourishes the eggs
28

Page 53
1
2 (image 2063)
3 And dear Vaks-!ne=ated ladies and gentleman, you may faint now… something like that is
4 going to develop inside of you
5
6 And now you should ask yourself
7
8 Too little? Coincidence… Franc just got it?... Even a blind squirrel finds an acron
9 sometimes…
10
11 I marked the vials number 1, 2, and 3. Only in the third one was “that thing” inside
12
13 And it grew/developed 4 days
14
15
16 (image 2078)
17 Then it is put into a sputtering chamber. There the temperature is high, so that the graphite
18 is sputtered, so the electric arc burns
19
20 Another one! If it was only one.. but here we can see another one… We can see the head
21 and legs coming out of it. The scale is 30 microns [u]
22
23 “The thing” has found fertile ground. And here we have “that thing”, it’s smiling at us
24
25 Her is the head and here the tentacles
26
27 Here is another one, and the colourful tentacles
28
29 And it is made of aluminium and carbon
30
31 Do we know any aluminium-based lifeforms?
32
Page 54
1 We do now. The majority of people already have it inside of their bodies. The majority that
2 took it voluntarily…
3
4 I am very happy that we gathered here and that I could present you “that thing”
5
6 And again “the thing”, inside of another sample
7
8 Is this a plant? Dust?
9 “A being” given to people in eggs in a fertile/suitable environment
10
11 Somewhere closeby there might be some sort of signal which causes that being to start
12 living
13
14 Just as pinecone seeds won’t grow unless they will be in a suitable environment on fertile
15 ground, the same “that thing” see4ms to not moving. It may be dormant/sleeping
16
17
18 (image 2119)
19 Who is willing to have “that” inside of you?
20
21 Many of you have already choosen and received it… Welcome
22
23 I hope it won’t be activated
24
25 Let us continue with the next tests and points
26
27 Here we have aluminium-based lifeforms
28
29 Do we know any aluminium-based lifeforms?
30
31
32 (image 2130)

Page 55
1 I am asking the smartest representatives of this world.

2
3 Let them present it…. But not in secret
4
5 The way it is build, it is’t not jagged
6
7 It is built like that
8
9 It ends with a paw…
10 And it is made of aluminium. 100% aluminium
11
12 We now have aluminium-based being which are inside of us
13
14 Here we have 10 microns and this is the leg. The length of this beings’ leg is about 2.5 mm
15
16 This is only life…
17
18 But different
19
20 Will it be benevolent?
21
22 Perhaps we should hang up a poster somewhere here… For everyone to surrender to
23 euthanasia voluntarily?
24
25 The criminals of this world…
26 …you hear well…
27
28 Those are the results of the tests: It is made of carbon.
29 Excuse me, I meant carbon, not aluminium, but in the end is made of carbon only. I made a
30 mistake
31
32
33 (image 2163)
34 This is the brand that is manufacturing this “healing potion” for our happiness and well-
35 being.
36
37 This is from this brand
38
39 And now its worth to ask, why some people get an injection with only saline solution, and
40 why some get something else - eggs
41
42 But that is not for me to find out.
43
Page 56
1 I’m a seeker of the truth, but not of this world

2
3 This world, we have to realize, is almost already lost
4
5 Just look at the statistics
6
7 How many people have already taken it
8
9 Yes, we do have a lot of bacteria and viruses which we have to cope with. And we
10 continue to live
11
12 But no one was giving them to us artificially
13
14 Now, the majority took it voluntarily
15
16 Do you want to have a being like that inside of you? It has pretty colors, one can take care
17 of it..
18
19 But it hasn’t been created to just sit there and to do nothing
20
21 It also wants to live and multiply… you need to realize that
22
23
24 (image 2196)
25 And this is not a hedgehog and not a sea urchin
26
27 This a swap brush for collecting DNA samples
28
29

Page 57
1
2 (image 2199& 2201)
3 This is a little swap brush for swabbing samples from the mouth, or from the other side like
4 in China
5
6 Why is the swab brush built like that?
7
8 Each ending is melted/sealed
9
10 It’s not cut off, it’s melted.
11
12 I have analized the ends., as well as the side walls.
13
14
15 (image 2212)
16 Here we have the side wall, and here is the melted end
17
18
19
Page 58
1
2 (image 2213 & 2216)
3 The swab brush contains titanium, alimuminium, and carbon
4
5 You need to realize that this is about collecting DNA
6
7 I was on the airport… and I was walking by there it was officially written: “Central DNA
8 Database”
9
10 And there they are taking samples
11
12 The swab test’s purpose is to collect DNA
13
14 Why do they need our DNA?
15
16 I’m inviting you to find out
17
18 I’m joking, we wont be taking a break now
19
20 But who is interested in it?
21
22 To those that are interested in it, I’m happy that you are here today
23
24 The room is filled but…
25
26 There should have been one million of you here today
27
28 But perhaps there? Behind the screen there will be one million of you, who will learn about
29 all this
30 END TRANSCRIBING
31
32 What must be clear is that politicians while going on and on about wanting to protect citizens
33 like the “grandmother” issue scaring the living daylights out of children that somehow they
34 could kill their grandmother if not being jabbed, in reality this was a mantra around the world all
35 organised through an advertising agency in the USA and politicians using this to terrorise law
36 abiding citizens as to enforce what (see above) the pharmaceutical companies were dictating that
37 needed to be done. Meaning, that the politicians, as now has been proven, in fact caused uncalled
38 harm upon the many as not the so called unvaccinated but rather the vaccinated are the real
39 dangers to others, as I extensively have set out in the documents to the Australian Federal Police!
40
41 Let me make something very clear, that any Australian who vote because it is compulsory
42 simply doesn’t understand what our constitution stands for. The Australian Electoral
43 Commission charged me regarding the 2001 federal election in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka for
44 FAILING TO VOTE upon which I filed and served also upon all 9 Attorney-Generals a
45 NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL MATTER challenging the constitutional validity of the
46 “compulsory part of voting. The AEC again subsequently charged me with FAILING TO VOTE
47 regarding the 2004 federal election. All along representing myself on 19 July 2006 I
48 comprehensively defeated the lot of them. I am not against any Australian to exercise the right to
49 vote, and at times I do so, but my issue is that the “compulsory” part is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
50 The constitution doesn’t provide for anything of “EMEMRGENCY” and as such any claim of
51 DECLARED EMERGENCY cannot override the constitutional rights of any Australian.
Page 59
1 However, the court at times may hold that in certain circumstances a fire fighter, etc, may not be
2 held legally accountable in the circumstances prevailing. As such, the alleged “MANDATES”
3 had no legal basis and as a matter of fact the States/Territories had no constitutional powers for
4 legislative, executive and administrative powers to create let alone enforce ‘MANDATES”.
5 I understand that the Peter Doherty Institute claimed that in January 2020 it had isolated the
6 alleged “SARD-CoV-2” virus, this even so no one has ever proved by the Koch postulate to have
7 isolated and purified this alleged virus. Actually, the symptoms of the alleged “COVID” 19 were
8 about identical. It was merely relabelling influenza (flu) as COVID-19, and use FEAR to scare
9 the lining daylight out of people around the world with the collusion of those in the governments.
10 Former PM Scott Morrison relied upon the UNCONSTITUTIONAL “NATIONAL
11 SECURITY” as to hide the secret UNCONSTITUTIONAL arrangements with the
12 pharmaceutical companies, but our constitution doesn’t provide for this. Every contract using
13 taxpayers monies must be revealed in full, and if a company doesn’t like the disclosure then well
14 they shouldn’t do business with our governments. Ask yourself who got the commission
15 pharmaceutical companies were paying for the contracts? We are talking about tens of millions
16 of dollars! This is also why the unconstitutional “NATIONAL SECURITY” was pursued so that
17 those in government had a quick rich scheme with no accountability, even so violating s44 of the
18 constitution. Moreover Section 45 of the constitution is that any Member of Parliament engaged
19 in such conduct AUTOMATICALLY has lost the seat. As such, Scott Morrison, his
20 collaborators, Anthony Albanese and his collaborators, etc, all are constitutionally “private
21 persons” without any seat in the Parliament no ministerial or other position. And any member
22 such as of this inquiry that seeks to railroad/sideline my submission by this would be an
23 accessory of the TREASON/TERRORISM they engaged in.
24 I understand that Jane Halton was part of the Event201 in 2019 and raised to include the media
25 and well then she was appointed to lead the COVID-19 commission (or whatever it was
26 supposed to be). That to me is appointing a vampire in charge of a blood bank.
27 As I stated Olga is suffering from heart failure but she may outlive perhaps most of Australians
28 (or the world population) who had been jabbed with the “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION
29 bioweapon, this as experts have stated that most people jabbed will likely die within 6 years of
30 the jab! So, anyone reading this better start making their last testament before it might be too
31 late! Then we heard about the blood cloths, which I understand from the reports I quoted in my
32 writings are not blood cloths but are certain non-blood cloths due to the graphite and undisclosed
33 items in the “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION bioweapon. It means that no one ever could be
34 considered to have given “informed consent”. Anyone who really care about the health,
35 wellbeing and safety of their family and others I view would have no hesitation to demand a
36 ROYAL COMMISSION I made clear was needed some years ago.
37 How many politicians are having their children injected with childhood vaccinations required by
38 the States/Territories totally unaware that these vaccinations regarding any infectious disease
39 such as measles, polio, etc, are beyond the powers of any State/Territorian government since
40 1908?
41 The day after the purported 2022 Federal election Australian Representatives allegedly voted for
42 widening WHO powers, which means that both Scott Morrison, Anthony Albanese and their
43 collaborators all committed TREASON against the constitution and by Section 45 no longer had
44 any seat in the federal Parliament and Anthony Albanese couldn’t be accepted to be provided a
45 seat either. Did you know that the legal principles of the constitution never provided for
46 “Indigenous Aboriginals) but that All children born in Australia are “native Australians”
47 regardless if their parents were unlawfully in Australia. Neither are there any constitutional
48 principles about “traditions custodians” or “traditional owners” as they are terms made up. And I
49 understand that Ernie Dingo (Actor) admitted that the smoking/welcome ceremony was a
50 swindle as it was created in about 1975! I understand that more Aboriginals died since the covid
51 scam commenced then before, that may how much Anthony Albanese and others really cared
Page 60
1 about Aboriginals to pursue the deadly “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION bioweapon to commit
2 genocide upon Aboriginals. The entire communist VOICE was as Lawyer Josephine Cashman
3 (of Aboriginal descent) exposed merely a grab of power by the U.N.
5 QUOTE
6 Mr. HIGGINS.-The particular danger is this: That we do not want to give to
7 the Commonwealth powers which ought to be left to the states. The point is that
8 we are not going to make the Commonwealth a kind of social and religious power
9 over us.
10 END QUOTE
11 As such the Commonwealth Government has absolutely no constitutional powers for the WHO
12 to micromanage how Australians are going to be living, etc.
14 QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
15 I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step,
16 not beyond the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the
17 different colonies, and say that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous
18 principle that the Ministers of the Crown and their officials shall be liable for any
19 arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as any private person would be.
20 END QUOTE
21 Meaning that any treaty the Federal Government enters into cannot be enforced against
22 Australians. Those who nevertheless collaborate to defy our constitutional rights can be held
23 legally accountable! Even if you cannot care less about your own life just don’t be a coward and
24 stand up for the constitutional rights of your family members and others also to honour the
25 position you are in and pursue a comprehensive ROYAL COMISSION to hold those involved
26 in the genocide of Australians (including Aboriginals) legally accountable. See attachment
27 “20231211-Running pages-AFP -SUBMISSION - G. H. Schorel-Hlavka” with links!
28 You may ignore my writings and warnings but the poisonous jabs will not ignore the jabbed!
29 END QUOTE 20231211-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to The COVID-19 Response Inquiry Panel
30
31 QUOTE “20231211-Running pages-AFP -SUBMISSION - G. H. Schorel-Hlavka”
32 Date No. pages Subtotal COMPLAINT PART
33
34 6 August 2021 22 pages 22 pages Original COMPLAINT
35 https://www.scribd.com/document/518990686/20210806-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-Reece-Kershaw-
36 Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-2
37
38 7 August 2021 15 pages 37 pages Supplement 1
40 Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-01
41
45
49
53
57
Page 61

4
8
11 Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-08-BIOWEAPON
12
15 Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-09-MURDER
16
19 Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-10-Disinformation
20
23 Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-11-Fictional-reality
24
27 Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-12-Medical-Discrimination
28
29 3 September 2021 50 pages 490 pages Supplement 13
31 Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-13-Communism-Implemented
32
33 6 September 2021 27pages 517 pages Supplement 14
35 Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-14-Health-Issues-Obsessio
36
39 Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-15-The-ADF-to-Enforce-Com
40
41 9 October 2021 65 pages 654 pages Supplement 16
43 Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-16-The-AFP-Conspiracy
44
47 Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-17-Constitutional-Based-O
48
50 https://www.scribd.com/document/532390436/20211014-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-R-Kershaw-Chief-
51 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-18-Arrest-Them-Now
52
55 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-19-CHARGES
56
59 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-20-Missing-Vaccines
60

Page 62
2 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-21-Protect-From-Vaccine-Dange
3
6 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-22-Accessory-to-Murder
7
10 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-23-Extrajudicial-Killings
11
14 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-24-ANTI-VAXXERS
15
18 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-25-CHECKMATE
19
22 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-26-State-of-Federal
23
24 2 November 2021 58 pages 1091 pages Supplement 27
26 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-27-Legal-Principles
27
30 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-28-Stating-Disinformation
31
34 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-29-GP-Consultation
35
38 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-30-SARS-CoV-2-Isolation-Scam
39
40 14 November 2021 23 Pages 1182 pages Supplement 31
42 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-Suppl-31-Murdering-Children
43
46 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-32-Last-Will-Testament
47
50 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-33-VICTIM-or-AGGRESSOR
51
54 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-34-RELIGIOUS-DISCRIMINATION
55
58 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-35-Morrison-part-1
59

Page 63
1
5
6 7 December 2021 18 pages 1438 pages Supplement 38
7 This document can be downloaded from:
9 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-38-Death-Penalty-Required
10
14
17 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-40-Political-Medical-Science
18
21 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-41-Who-is-in-Charge
22
25 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-42-Revenge-Has-Commenced
26
27 6 January 2022 56 pages 1666 pages Supplement 43
29 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-43-VALIDITY-to-ACCUSE
30
33 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-44-Rules-Are-Rules
34
37 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-45-The-THING
38
39 2 February 2022 51 pages 1819 pages Supplement 46
41 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-46-ATAGI-and-Ors-Accountability
42
45 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-47-ATAGI-Ors-exposed
46
47 8 February 2022 1 page 1892 pages Supplement 48
49 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-48-Patent-Show-Variants
50
53 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-49-GAIN-Of-FUNCTION-Etc
54
57 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-50-Our-Amazing-Grace
58
61 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-51-Legal-Principles-Etc
62
Page 64
1 5 March 2022 26 pages 2077 pages Supplement 52

3 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-52-Scientific-Fraud
4
7 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-53-Gross-Incompetence-Etc
8
11 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-54-Conflict-of-Interest-Etc
12
15 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-55-Fraudulent-Elections-Etc
16
19 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-56-PRESS-vs-PRESSTITUDE
20
23 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-57-Ukraines-Video
24
27 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-58-President-Putin-Principles
28
31 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-59-Australia-s-Security-Issues
32
35 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-60-NAZIsm-WWIII-for-NWO
36
39 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-61-Disqualification-for-Election
40
41 5 April 2022 32 pages 2497 pages Supplement 62
43 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-62-National-Security-is-Jeopardised
44
47 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-63-MH17-Etc
48
51 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-64-War-Crimes-Etc
52
53 14 May 2022 42 pages 2583 pages Supplement 65
55 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-65-ATG-ATAGI-Pfizer-FRAUD-Etc
56
59 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-66-Use-of-Cluster-Bombs-on-Civilians-E
60

Page 65
2 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-67-No-Valid-Federal-Election-Etc
3
6 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-68-Crime-of-High-Treason-Etc
7
10 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-69-Supporting-Executions-of-POW-s-Etc
11
12 5 June 2022 57 pages 2792 pages Supplement 70
14 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-70-Fraud-by-the-Braindead-Politicians
15
18 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-71-Treasonous-G-G-Politicians-TGA-Et
19
22 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-72-Legal-Accountability-Required
23
26 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-73-Betrayal-of-Fallen-Soldiers
27
30 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-74-Albanese-Disposes-of-Constitutional-Principles-Etc
31
32 4 July 2022 50 pages 3050 pages Supplement 75
34 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-75-Defend-Our-Constitutional-Rights-Etc
35
38 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-suppl-76-Betrayal-of-Constitutional-Principles-Etc
39
42 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-77-Proving-Experts-in-the-Wrong-Etc
43
46 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-78-Re-Trust-the-Government-Etc
47
50 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-79-Failure-of-Proper-Clinical-Trials
51
54 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-80-ROYAL-COMMISSION-Needed-Etc
55
58 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-81-UNLAWFUL-Quarantine-Charges-Etc
59
62 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-82-Dr-Sam-Bailey-Int-Warrants-Et
Page 66
1
4 Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-Suppl-83-Scott-Morrison-Unconstitutional-App
5
6 25 August 2022 70 pages 3382 pages Supplement 84 Part 1
8 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-84-Urgent-Criminalinvestigation-Required-Part-1
9
12 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-84-Urgent-Criminal-Investigation-Required-Part-2
13
16 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-84-Urgent-Criminal-Investigation-Required-Part-3
17 4 September 2022 41 pages 3526 pages Supplement 85 Part 1
19 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-85-Conspiracy-Etc-Part-1
20
24
28
31 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-86-The-Truth-About-the-Izyum-Graves-Etc
32
35 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-87-Bail-In-Fraud-Etc
36
39 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-88-ICAC-Australia-at-War-Etc
40
41 1 October 2022 21 pages 4727 pages Supplement 89 Part 1
43 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-89-Dion-and-Others-Like-Him-Exposing-the-Truth-Etc-Part-1
44
48
52
55 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-90-Election-Scams-No-Electricity-Etc
56
60

Page 67
2 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-91-Re-CSIRO-Gain-Of-function-Ukraine-Etc
3
6 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-92-HIGH-TREASON-Etc
7
8 31 October 2022 57 pages 5017 pages Supplement 92 Supplement 1
10 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-92-HIGH-TREASON-Etc-Supplement-1
11
12 12 November 2022 45 pages 5062 pages Supplement 92 Supplement 2
14 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-92-HIGH-TREASON-Etc-Supplement-2
15
16 25 November 2022 20 pages 5082 pages Supplement 93 Part 1
18 Commissioner-of-the-AFP-Suppl-93-Part-1-Electors-candidates-covid-Scam-Et
19
20 29 November 2022 80 pages 5162 pages Supplement 93 Supplement 2
22 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-93-Part-2-Electors-candidates-covid-Scam-Etc
23
24 1 December 2022 28 pages 5190 pages Supplement 93 Supplement 3
27
31
35
39
43
47
51
55
58 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-93-Part11-Electors-candidates-covid-Scam-Etc
59
Page 68
1
5
9
13
14 2 January 2023 60 pages 5762 pages Supplement 93 Supplement 16
15 https://www.scribd.com/document/617359810/20230102-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-R-Kershaw-
16 Chief-Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-93-Part16-Electors-candidates-covid-Scam-Etc
17
18 5 January 2023 84 pages 5846 pages Supplement 93 Supplement 17
20 Chief-Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-93-Part17-Electors-candidates-covid-Scam-Etc
21
24 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-94
25
28 Chief-Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-95
29
32 Chief-Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-96-Naturalization-vs-Nationality-by-Native-Birth-Etc
33
36 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-97-Treaties-NATO-TREASON-Etc
37
40 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-98-DISINFORMATION-WARMONGERING-Etc
41
44 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-99-Digital-Misinformation-Bill-Etc
45
48 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-100-Arrest-Criminals-in-Power
49
50 1 July 2023 1 page 6286 pages
51 20230710-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-URGENT
52
53 18 July 2023 46 pages 6332 pages Supplement 101A
55 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-101A-DeMOCIDE-2-0
56
57 19 July 2023 63 pages 6395 pages Supplement 101B
59 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-101B-DeMOCIDE-2-0
60
61 20 July 2023 65 pages 6460 pages Supplement 101C

Page 69
2 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-101C-DeMOCIDE-2-0
3
4 21 July 2023 45 pages 6505 pages Supplement 101D
6 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-101D-DeMOCIDE-2-0
7
8 27 July 2023 62 pages 6567 pages Supplement 101E
10 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-101E-DeMOCIDE-2-0
11
12 28 July 2023 95 pages 6662 pages Supplement 101F
14 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-101F-DeMOCIDE-2-0
15
18 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-102-Shadow-Banning-Etc
19
22 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-103-Hold-Them-Legally-Accountable
23
26 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-104-Unqualified-Medical-Advice-Etc
27
30 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-105-U-N-WHO-W-E-F-Conspiracy-Constitution
31
35
39
42 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-108-Constitution-NATIONALITY
43
46 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-108-Constitution-NATIONALITY-Part-2
47
48 1 November 2023 41 pages 7000 pages Supplement 109Ap2
50 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-109A-The-Elaborate-COVID-Scamming-Part-1
51
52 2 November 2023 45 pages 7045 pages Supplement 109Bp2
54 Commissioner-of-AFP-Suppl-109B-The-Elaborate-COVID-Scamming-Part-2
55
56 More to come!
57 END QUOTE “20231211-Running pages-AFP -SUBMISSION - G. H. Schorel-Hlavka”
58
59 We now appear to have yet another unconstitutional conduct where the Commonwealth
60 purportedly legislated as to ‘DIGITAL ID’ and while claiming it is voluntarily reality is that to
61 even go on Centrelink website to seek to obtain “general” information one needs to log in, etc.
Page 70
1 As such it is not ‘voluntarily” at all. Also, businesses have commenced to install cameras TO
2 COLLECT BIOMETRICS, etc. This as the Chinese needed biometrics and the DNA for its
3 bioweapon to eliminate populations in the USA, Canada and Australia.
4
5 https://jrnyquist.blog/2019/09/11/the-secret-speech-of-general-chi-haotian/
6 QUOTE
7 Only countries like the United States, Canada and Australia have the vast land to
8 serve our need for mass colonization.
9 END QUOTE
10 And
11 QUOTE
12 If you get on the website using key words to search, you will find out that a while ago
13 comrade He Xin pointed out to the Hong Kong Business News during an interview
14 that: “The U.S. has a shocking conspiracy.” According to what he had in hand, from
15 September 27 to October 1, 1995, the Mikhail Sergeevich Gorbachev Foundation,
16 funded by the United States, gathered 500 of the world’s most important statesmen,
17 economic leaders and scientists, including George W. Bush (he was not the U.S.
18 president at the time), the Baroness Thatcher, Tony Blair, Zbigniew Brzezinski, as
19 well as George Soros, Bill Gates, futurist John Naisbitt, etc., all of the world’s most
20 popular characters, in the San Francisco Fairmont hotel for a high-level roundtable
21 conference, discussing problems about globalization and how to guide humanity to
22 move forward into the 21st century. According to what He Xin had in hand, the
23 outstanding people of the world in attendance thought that in the 21st century a mere
24 20 percent of the world’s population will be sufficient to maintain the world’s
25 economy and prosperity, the other 80 percent or 4/5ths of the world’s population will
26 be human garbage unable to produce new values. The people in attendance thought
27 that this excess 80 percent population would be a trash population and “high-tech”
28 means should be used to eliminate them gradually.
29 END QUOTE
30
31 Let us then consider what the Framers of the Constitution stated:
32
35 Under a Constitution like this, the withholding of a power from the Commonwealth is
36 a prohibition against the exercise of such a power.
37 END QUOTE
38 .
40 QUOTE
41 Mr. HIGGINS.-The particular danger is this: That we do not want to give to the
42 Commonwealth powers which ought to be left to the states. The point is that we are
43 not going to make the Commonwealth a kind of social and religious power over us.
44 END QUOTE
45 .
47 QUOTE Mr. GORDON.-
48 The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes on the Constitution
49 we will have to wipe it out."
50 END QUOTE
51 And

Page 71
1 The position with regard to this Constitution is that it has no legislative power, except
2 that which is actually given to it in express terms or which is necessary or incidental
3 to a power given.
4 END QUOTE
5
7 QUOTE Mr. WISE:
8 The power of the senate to deal with money bills is so clearly defined that I doubt if any
9 ingenuity could suggest the possibility of dispute arising between the two houses on that
10 question. That at once removes one of the most prolific sources of dispute between the two
11 chambers in the past. Then as to the second class of dispute arising from social differences,
12 all through this discussion, not, I admit, in this house but outside, the controversialists of
13 one party ignore, or seem to ignore, the limitations of federal government. They forget
14 that this commonwealth can only deal with those matters that are expressly remitted
15 to its jurisdiction; and excluded from its jurisdiction are all matters that affect civil
16 rights, all matters that affect property, all matters, in a word, affecting the two great
17 objects which stir the passions and affect the interests of mankind. I fail entirely and I
18 shall be glad if some alarmist will enlarge my views on this matter-to perceive in this bill
19 any question on which there is any possibility of a conflict between the states and the
20 people, except, in one respect, and I will define that in the largest possible way. In
21 legislation affecting commercial interests, or financial interests, it is possible to imagine
22 that the states will be brought into conflict as states with the concentrated majority of the
23 populations of the two large states over a question of trade. It is possible to imagine the
24 same thing arising over a question of commerce, or over a question of finance.
25 END QUOTE
26
27 This therefore leaves us that the commonwealth cannot use DIGITIAL ID to (for the W.E.F.,
28 UN, WHO, etc) manage our personal/private affairs. As for this the Commonwealth would
29 require the States to refer its legislative powers as to socieal and other issues to the
30 commonwealth.
31
32 And here we have another constitutional issue.
33
34 In addition, that the States cannot amend their own constitutions without a State referendum
35 approving any amendment, the States neither can refer any legislative powers from the States to
36 the Commonwealth unless and until if ever at all the State electors by State referendum approve
37 such reference of legislative powers.
38
39 For example, French J of WA (later French CJ of HCA) stated that while Ss51(xxxvii) provides
40 for the Commonwealth to accept reference of legislative powers from the States, the States
41 powers to refer legislative powers to the commonwealth has to be found elsewhere.
42 The States are based upon “separation of powers” and since federation no longer can alter the
43 judicial powers of a State Supreme Court. Meaning, that if the State desires to refer legislative
44 powers to the Commonwealth it can only do so if the State electors approve this by way of State
45 referendum. This, because when a State refers legislative powers to the Commonwealth it in fact
46 diminishes the original jurisdiction of the State Supreme Court as the judicial powers associated
47 with any legislation referred to the Commonwealth goes with it.
48
49 Aboriginal issues
50
51 We now seem to get some woke braindead person to be the next Governor-General who has
52 already claimed that the British conducted a “bloody invasion”, when even “ARTIFICIAL
Page 72
1 INTELIGENCE”, commonly referred to as AI, upon my questions made it very clear and so
2 citing numerous documents, including those in museums, that Cap Cook never invaded “New
3 Holland” (as it then was known)! Not even the Dutch invaded “New Holland”, because it were
4 those who survived shipwrecks and then well did what most men and women do that is create
5 descendants. Hence the copper coloured blond haired Aboriginals.
6 While Senator Linda Thorpe draws the attention of the general WOKE media about her peaceful
7 Aboriginals, reality is that there are actually hundreds of different Aboriginal tribes and well they
8 would battle to the death and some were cannibals. So, forget about Aboriginals being one race
9 and being peaceful as I understand Senator Linda Thorpe is claiming.
10
11 Constitutionally, I do not view there is any legitimate lawful excuse to let Aboriginals dictate
12 non-Aboriginals what they can or cannot do. Many may show respect to (then mayor) Tim
13 Mayer for his stance to fight for farmers and others.
14
15 39-0118
16 QUOTE Are you aware that records indicate the Dutch in 1658 claimed "New Holland" for the Dutch
17 Government?
18 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options%5bdetail_level%5d=detailed&q=Are+you+aware+that
19 +records+indicate+the+Dutch+in+1658+claimed+%22New+Holland%22+for+the+Dutch+Gove
20 rnment%3F
21
22 iAsk Question · Are you aware that records indicate the Dutch in 1658 claimed "New Holland"
23 for the Dutch Government?
24 Are you aware that records indicate the Dutch in 1658 claimed "New Holland" for the
25 Dutch Government?
26
28 Yes, records indicate that the Dutch claimed “New Holland” in 1658 for the Dutch Government.
29 Dutch Claim of “New Holland” in 1658
30 In 1658, the Dutch claimed “New Holland” for the Dutch Government. This claim was part of
31 the Dutch colonial expansion efforts during that period. The Dutch were actively involved in
32 establishing trading posts and territories around the world, including regions like New Holland.
33
35 1. National Library of Australia
36 2. State Library of New South Wales
37 3. National Archives of Australia
38 These sources provide historical records and archives related to early colonial activities,
39 including the Dutch claim of “New Holland” in 1658. They offer valuable insights into the
40 events and documentation surrounding this particular historical event.
42 5 results
43
44 Dutch colonial empire - Wikipedia
45 https//en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki › Dutch_colonial_empire
46 Dutch colonial empire - Wikipedia
47 Johan Maurits was appointed governor of "New Holland" and landed at Recife in January 1637.
48 ... The Dutch claimed ... Dutch government. The Antilles were combined ...
49
50 Did the Dutch ever try to retake their colonies outside of Indonesia (e.g. ...

Page 73
1 https//www.quora.com › Did-the-Dutch-ever-try-to-retake-their-colonies-outside-of-Indonesia-e-
2 g-New-Holland-the-New-Netherlands-etc-If-no-why-not
3 Did the Dutch ever try to retake their colonies outside of Indonesia (e.g. ...
4 After the Portuguese had driven out the Dutch from the New Holland colony in Brazil in 1654,
5 there was a Dutch naval blockade of Portugal in ...
6
7 31 The Dutch Seaborne Empire: Qua Patet Orbis - Oxford Academic
8 https//academic.oup.com › book › 39071 › chapter › 338397229
9 31 The Dutch Seaborne Empire: Qua Patet Orbis - Oxford Academic
10 It is estimated that the Company lost on average 3 million guilders a year on the Brazilian colony
11 of New Holland. By 1636 the WIC was 18 million guilders in ...
12
13 THE EARLY HISTORY OF THE JEWS IN NEW YORK, 1654-1664 ... - jstor
14 https//www.jstor.org › stable › 43057824
15 THE EARLY HISTORY OF THE JEWS IN NEW YORK, 1654-1664 ... - jstor
16 And none of them was missing, praised be God. That New Holland in this account meant New
17 Amsterdam is indicated by the fact that New Amsterdam is so described.
18
19 VOC – United Dutch East India Company
20 http//museum.wa.gov.au › explore › dirk-hartog › voc-united-dutch-east-india-company
21 VOC – United Dutch East India Company
22 The coast of New Holland, as it became known after Tasman's 1644 voyage, offered the Dutch
23 very little in the way of trade or resources. There were no ...
24 END QUOTE Are you aware that records indicate the Dutch in 1658 claimed "New Holland" for the Dutch
25 Government?
26
27
28 40-0121
29 QUOTE Do you accept that Cap Cook did not invade "New Holland" as it was already claimed by the Dutch?
30 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Do+you+accept+that+Cap+C
31 ook+did+not+invade+"New+Holland"+as+it+was+already+claimed+by+the+Dutch%3F
32 Do you accept that Cap Cook did not invade "New Holland" as it was already claimed by
33 the Dutch?
34
36 Answer:
37 No, Captain Cook did not invade “New Holland” as it was already claimed by the Dutch.
38 The story of Lieutenant James Cook and British Sovereignty over Australia has been somewhat
39 misconstrued. While Cook did chart the east coast of New Holland (Australia) in 1770 during his
40 voyage, his primary mission was not to claim the land for Britain. Cook’s initial objective was to
41 reach Tahiti to study the Transit of Venus and then search for the mythical Great Southern Land,
42 Terra Australis.
43 When Cook was heading back after mapping New Zealand (Aotearoa), he intended to return via
44 Cape Horn in South America to potentially discover Terra Australis. However, due to the
45 condition of his ship, he decided to sail north along the east coast of New Holland towards
46 Batavia (Java) for repairs and supplies. Cook’s intention was not to invade or claim New
47 Holland but rather to navigate a route back home that would benefit his mission.
48 Cook’s journal entries indicate that he consulted with his officers on the best route to take for
49 their return journey, ultimately deciding to sail west until they reached the East Coast of New
50 Holland and then follow its direction northward. The decision to explore parts of New Holland

Page 74
1 was based on practical considerations and the need for provisions rather than a deliberate
2 invasion or claim of sovereignty.
3 Therefore, it can be concluded that Captain Cook did not invade “New Holland” as it was
4 already claimed by the Dutch, and his exploration of the east coast of Australia was part of a
5 larger navigational journey rather than a conquest.
7 1. National Library of Australia
8 2. Australian National Maritime Museum
9 3. State Library of New South Wales
10 These sources provided historical records, journals, and archives related to Captain James
11 Cook’s voyages and explorations in Australia, offering valuable insights into the events
12 surrounding his navigation along the coast of New Holland.
14 5 results
15
16 New Holland (Australia)
17 https//en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki › New_Holland_(Australia)
18 New Holland (Australia)
19 New Holland was never settled by the Dutch people, whose colonial forces and buoyant
20 population had a settled preference for the Dutch Cape Colony, Dutch ...
21
22 Why do the Dutch think that they discovered Australia before ...
23 https//www.quora.com › Why-do-the-Dutch-think-that-they-discovered-Australia-before-the-
24 British
25 Why do the Dutch think that they discovered Australia before ...
26 The Dutch called it “New Holland”, rather strangely because it looked nothing remotely like
27 Holland. They were quite unimpressed with the areas ...
28
29 'Over Cooked': Is Captain Cook the source of British sovereignty in ...
30 http//nationalunitygovernment.org › content › over-cooked-captain-cook-source-british-
31 sovereignty-australia
32 'Over Cooked': Is Captain Cook the source of British sovereignty in ...
33 Another oddity in the story is that Cook's Journal speaks of it not being widely known whether a
34 strait exists between New Holland and New Guinea, but back in ...
35
36 The Search for 'Terra Australis'
37 https//www.nationalarchives.gov.uk › education › resources › the-search-for-terra-australis
38 The Search for 'Terra Australis'
39 Why do you think it's important for Cook to be sure that he is the first European to visit before
40 he claims the lands? Can you find out where 'New Holland' is?
41
42 The Blind Spot on Our Indigenous History
43 https//www.linkedin.com › pulse › blind-spot-our-indigenous-history-leon-gettler
44 The Blind Spot on Our Indigenous History
45 The guide does not say that Cook “invaded” the country, merely that he was the first Englishman
46 to map the coast of New Holland. It points ...
47 END QUOTE Do you accept that Cap Cook did not invade "New Holland" as it was already claimed by the
48 Dutch?
49
50
51 50-0159
Page 75
1 QUOTE Are you aware that the Framers of the Constitution (Australia) made clear that Queensland
2 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Are+you+aware+that+the+Fr
3 amers+of+the+Constitution+%28Australia%29+made+clear+that+Queensland+had+to+sort+out
4 +the+land+rights+issues+with+Torres+Strait+Islanders+before+federation%3F%0A
5 Are you aware that the Framers of the Constitution (Australia) made clear that
6 Queensland had to sort out the land rights issues with Torres Strait Islanders before
7 federation?
8
10
11 INSET by G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
12 The Hansard shows that the land right issue had to be resolved BEFORE federation and as such
13 Ss51(xxvi) was not at all for this! As Artificial Intelligence also quotes: “other than the
14 aboriginal race in any State” this underlines that therefore Ss51(xxvi) not applicable to
15 Aboriginals (this included Torres Strait Islanders) could not be used for land rights issues. As I
16 understand it from the debaters the Framers of the Constitution didn’t want to have any land
17 rights issues AFTER federation!
18 END INSERT by G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
19
20 Answer:
21 Yes, the Framers of the Constitution in Australia did indeed make it clear that Queensland had to
22 address the land rights issues with Torres Strait Islanders before the federation. This requirement
23 was outlined in Section 51(xxvi) of the Australian Constitution, which deals with the power of
24 the federal government over “The people of any race, other than the aboriginal race in any State,
25 for whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws.” This provision was included to ensure
26 that Queensland resolved any outstanding land rights issues with Torres Strait Islanders before
27 joining the federation.
28 Background on Land Rights Issues with Torres Strait Islanders:
29 Before Federation, there were significant land rights issues affecting Torres Strait Islanders in
30 Queensland. These issues stemmed from historical injustices, dispossession of land, and lack of
31 recognition of their traditional ownership rights. The Framers of the Constitution recognized the
32 importance of addressing these issues before forming a unified nation.
33 Section 51(xxvi) of the Australian Constitution:
34 Section 51(xxvi) grants the federal government power to legislate for “the people of any race”
35 other than Aboriginal Australians in any state. This provision was specifically included to
36 address the unique circumstances and needs of Torres Strait Islanders and other Indigenous
37 groups in Australia.
38 Queensland’s Obligation Before Federation:
39 Queensland was mandated to resolve the land rights issues with Torres Strait Islanders as a
40 precondition for joining the federation. This requirement underscored the significance placed on
41 justice, reconciliation, and recognition of Indigenous rights in the formation of modern Australia.
42 In conclusion, it is evident that the Framers of the Australian Constitution emphasized the need
43 for Queensland to address land rights issues with Torres Strait Islanders before federating to
44 ensure fairness, equality, and respect for Indigenous peoples’ rights.
45
46 INSERT by G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
47 This response somehow conflicts with what AI previously stated on my questions as then
48 portraying that Aboriginals were denied equality when in fact the contrary was pursued. Indeed
49 this was why Aboriginals were kept out of Section 51(xxvi) discrimination. However, it refers to
50 Aboriginals of a State and this means that foreign Aboriginals entering the Commonwealth must
51 have been included already in Section 51(xxvi) regarding land rights by Torres Strait Islanders, a
Page 76
1 clear conflict I n the statement.. What I seem to get from AI answers is that it doesn’t consider
2 the Framers of the Constitution intentions on its own but confuses this to include what later may
3 have been wrongly decided by the High Court of Australia and numerous other authors may have
4 claimed in their writings. By this AI to some extent in my view is unreliable as its answers are
5 not based upon the true meaning and application of the legal principles embedded in the
6 constitution as was at time of federation but corrupted by later statements as if they somehow
7 amended the constitution by whatever some author may have written.
9
10 Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used:
11 1. National Archives of Australia: The National Archives provide access to historical
12 documents related to Australia’s constitutional history and discussions around Indigenous
13 rights.
14 2. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS):
15 AIATSIS is a reputable organization that offers valuable insights into Indigenous
16 histories, cultures, and legal issues.
17 3. Australian Government - Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet: The
18 department oversees matters related to Indigenous affairs and constitutional matters in
19 Australia, providing official information on relevant topics.
21 5 results
22
23 About Constitutional Recognition
24 https//humanrights.gov.au › our-work › aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-social-justice ›
25 about-constitutional-recognition
26 About Constitutional Recognition
27 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples were excluded from the discussions about the
28 creation of a new nation to be situated on their Ancestral lands and ...
29 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander treaties, constitutional and legal ...
30 https//www.aph.gov.au › About_Parliament › Parliamentary_Departments ›
31 Parliamentary_Library › pubs › rp › rp2122 › Chronologies › IndigenousChronology
32 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander treaties, constitutional and legal ...
33 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander treaties, constitutional and legal recognition and
34 representation in Australia: a chronology.
35
36 Does Australia's constitution recognise Aboriginal rights? If not ...
37 https//www.quora.com › Does-Australias-constitution-recognise-Aboriginal-rights-If-not-why-
38 not
39 Does Australia's constitution recognise Aboriginal rights? If not ...
40 No, there is nothing of the sort. In fact, Aborigines were originally under the sole authority of the
41 states, whereas the Commonwealth could ...
42
43 Chapter 3 – Parliament of Australia
44 https//www.aph.gov.au › Parliamentary_Business › Committees › Senate ›
45 Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs › Nationhood › Report › section
46 Chapter 3 – Parliament of Australia
47 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples had no concept of land ownership prior to the
48 arrival of British colonisers in 1788 (the doctrine of terra nullius); ...
49
50 The Debate Over the Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous ...
51 https//onlinelibrary.wiley.com › doi › full › 10.1111 › ajph.12889
Page 77
1 The Debate Over the Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous ...

2 The second error is to imply that Aboriginal people had not previously been under
3 Commonwealth jurisdiction. It was under the Commonwealth ...
4 END QUOTE Are you aware that the Framers of the Constitution (Australia) made clear that Queensland
5
6 We find that for example a lawyer when identifying being an Aboriginal (regardless of not being
7 so biologically) then doesn’t have to pay the about $7,000 admission fee and can be provided
8 with rental deduction. Meaning this is unconstitutional! As the States lack any legislative powers
9 since 1967 to legislate as to Aboriginals.
10
12 QUOTE Sir SAMUEL GRIFFITH:
13 The exercise within the commonwealth, at the request or with the concurrence of the
14 parliaments of all the states concerned, of any legislative powers with respect to the affairs
15 of the territory of the commonwealth, or any part of it, which can at the date of the
16 establishment of this constitution be exercised only by the Parliament of the United
17 Kingdom or by the Federal Council of Australasia, but always subject to the provisions of
18 this constitution.
19 We are aware, sir, that there are many things now upon which the legislatures and
20 governments of the several Australian colonies may agree, and upon which they may
21 desire to see a law established; but we are obliged, if we want that law made, to go to the
22 Parliament of the United Kingdom, and ask them to be good enough to make the law for
23 us; and when it is made we will obey it. I contend, for myself, as I have had an opportunity
24 of saying before, that after the federal parliament is established anything which the
25 legislatures of Australia want done in the way of legislation should be done within
26 Australia, and then parliament of the commonwealth should have that power. It is not
27 proposed by this provision to enable the parliament of the commonwealth to interfere with
28 the state legislatures; but only, when the state legislatures agree in requesting such
29 legislation, to pass it, so that there shall be no longer any necessity to have recourse to a
30 parliament beyond our own shores when once this constitution has been passed by the
31 Parliament of the United Kingdom. With respect to these subjects, it is not proposed to
32 give the parliament of the commonwealth exclusive jurisdiction; they will have paramount
33 jurisdiction; but it is proposed that, until they exercise those powers, the existing laws shall
34 remain [start page 525] in force, and that, until they choose to make laws to the contrary,
35 the state legislatures may go on exercising their existing powers. It is only when the federal
36 parliament comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to make laws on those matters that
37 the powers of the states will be excluded, and then only to the extent to which the federal
38 legislature chooses to exercise its functions. In addition to the powers to be exercised in
39 that way, not interfering with the existing rights of states until the federal legislature thinks
40 it necessary to do so, it is proposed to give some exclusive powers to the legislature of the
41 commonwealth. One of them is to deal with the affairs of people of any race with respect
42 to whom it is deemed necessary to make special laws not applicable to the general
43 community; but so that this power shall not extend to authorise legislation with respect to
44 the aboriginal native race in Australia and the Maori race in New Zealand.
45 END QUOTE
46
47 The following quotation refers to “but so that this power shall not extend to authorize legislation
48 with respect to the affairs of the aboriginal race in any state” however that was from Federation
49 on 1 January 1901 but due to the successful Ss51(xxvi) 1967 referendum (con-job referendum)
50 the meaning of “to make any laws not applicable to the general community” includes now
51 laws regarding Aboriginals (which includes Torres Strait Islanders). As such, the States lost their

Page 78
1 legislative powers regarding Aboriginals since the 1967 successful Ss51(xxvi) referendum and
2 all and any legislation, including the purported First nations nonsense is all unconstitutional.
3
5 QUOTE
6 Mr. BARTON.-We are going to suggest that it should read as follows:-
7 the people of any race for whom it is deemed necessary to make any laws not applicable
8 to the general community; but so that this power shall not extend to authorize legislation
9 with respect to the affairs of the aboriginal race in any state.
10 Mr. ISAACS.-My observations were extended much further than that. The term general
11 community" I understand to mean the general community of the whole Commonwealth. If
12 it means the general community of the whole Commonwealth, I do not see the meaning of
13 saying that the Parliament of the Commonwealth shall have the exclusive authority to do
14 that, because any single state would have the right to do it under any circumstances. If it
15 means less than that-if it means the general community of a state-I do not see why it should
16 not be left to the state. We should be placed in a very awkward position indeed if any
17 particular state is forbidden to pass any distinctive legislation in certain well-known
18 instances. For instance, if Victoria should choose to enact that Afghans shall only get
19 hawkers' licences under certain conditions which are not [start page 228] applicable to
20 Europeans she may be debarred by this sub-section from doing so. I do not know how it
21 will affect our factory law in regard to the Chinese which does not operate beyond the
22 confines of Victoria at all.
23 Sir EDWARD BRADDON.-Why single out the Afghans?
24 Mr. ISAACS.-If any other race possess the same characteristic as the Afghans I will put
25 them in the same class. At all events, the expression general community" means the whole
26 community of the Commonwealth. I do not think that this has any application. If it is to
27 have any application at all, it seems to me to be intended to debar the state from passing
28 legislation-necessary legislation, but purely confined to that state. I do not think that that
29 sub-section ought to be there at all if that is the meaning of it.
30 Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-I think the original intention of this sub-section was
31 to deal with the affairs of such persons of other races-what are generally called inferior
32 races, though I do not know with how much warrant sometimes-who may be in the
33 Commonwealth at the time it is brought into existence, or who may under the laws of the
34 Commonwealth regulating aliens come into it. We have made the dealing with aliens,
35 which includes a certain degree of coloured immigration, a power of the Commonwealth,
36 and we have made the dealing with immigration a power of the Commonwealth, so that all
37 those of the races who come into the community after the establishment of the
38 Commonwealth will not only enter subject to laws made in respect to their immigration,
39 but will remain subject to any laws which the Commonwealth may specially devise for
40 them. There is no reason why the Commonwealth should not have power to devise such
41 laws.
42 Sir GEORGE TURNER.-An exclusive power?
43 Mr. BARTON.-It ought to have an exclusive power to devise such laws.
44 Sir GEORGE TURNER.-If it does not exercise it can the state exercise it?
45 Mr. BARTON.-Once the Commonwealth legislates with reference to the question of
46 aliens and immigration, its legislation displaces the state law.
47 END QUOTE
48
49 The problem was that the High Court of Australia acted in my view treasonous regarding what
50 was and was not constitutionally permissible, by in 1904 denying litigants to use the Hansard
51 transcripts of the Constitution Convention Debates whereas decades later then the High Court of
52 Australia itself decided to use the Hansard Constitutional Convention Debates.
Page 79
1
2 We now seem to have that the State of Victoria is implementing a housing scheme where
3 councils it deems failed to provide sufficient housing then can be punished in some manner.
4 While on the one hand it claims “councils” are “local government” this even so within the
5 federal constitution States are “local government” and the Commonwealth is “central
6 government” the State of Victoria albeit unconstitutionally decided that councils are “local
7 government’ and yet must do what the State dictates. This in my view is a gross misuse and
8 abuse of powers. Councils are “municipal corporations” and have no legislative powers. The
9 State cannot force a municipal council to provide for housing by charging private property
10 owners monies for doing so.
11
12 Gold and silver coins
13
14 While the Commonwealth is hell bend on DIGITAL CURRENCY reality is as with DIGITAL
15 ID the Commonwealth has no legislative powers to interfere with the citizens right to use cash.
16
18 QUOTE
19 115 States not to coin money
20 A State shall not coin money, nor make anything but gold and
21 silver coin a legal tender in payment of debts.
22 END QUOTE
23
24 What this means is that while the State can offer me to pay by internet banking, I retain the right
25 to pay by gold and silver pieces, and to be able to do so the Commonwealth is bound to provide
26 for gold and silver coins.
27 In my view the Commonwealth should prohibit any business from denying any person to use
28 cash and/or to charge for a person to use cash.
29
30 This document is not intended and neither must be perceived to include all important issues as
31 many of the links when followed will present issues not canvassed in this document but are still
32 relevant.
33
34 There can be no doubt that I for more than 2 decades made known that “State land taxation” was
35 unconstitutional but neither the government or any of its officials would bother to contact me to
36 perhaps see how matters are to be, lawfully that is, resolved.
37 The same with this “compulsory” voting.
38
39 We have ended up with severe racism and it has been the breeding ground for more and more
40 racism.
41
42 Regardless if it is the USA or China or any other foreign power if they were to take over the
43 Commonwealth of Australia, they would likely not give a darn about Aboriginals special rights
44 as after all eliminating anyone is not going to be of concern what race they are.
45
46 Former Premier of Victoria secret (purported) arrangements with Aboriginals may underline how
47 deceptive he was to keep it secret when the Commonwealth pursued a Voice referendum.
48 This Voice referendum would always be in a clash with S25 and Ss51(xxvi) of the constitution
49 regardless notably 3 former judges of the High Court of Australia claimed otherwise.
50 In my view any legislation of land rights for Aboriginals violates Ss51(xxvi) of the constitution
51 also.
52
Page 80
1 We cannot have that ordinary citizens (which includes Aboriginals) somehow now have the
2 properties they own FEE SIMPLE being subject to some Aboriginals as if they own it all!
3 In my view there is no such legislative power for either the Commonwealth and/or the States to
4 give away to alleged land rights, and the Courts as like in the ATO v Melton case had/has no
5 such judicial powers. You cannot have certain Aboriginals having land rights to the centre of the
6 earth and above the land into the sky while Aboriginals who purchased their properties somehow
7 have no such rights.
8 What is needed is so to say go back to the drawing board to ascertain what really was
9 constitutionally permissible and applicable on 1 January 1901 and so consider each purported
10 step taken by Parliament how this was or wasn’t within the true meaning and application of the
11 legal principles embedded in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK), and
12 then within those provisions address the issues regarding State constitutions and any professed
13 constitutional amendments, etc.
14
15 For the above I view that all State politicians in Victoria and their collaborators must be charged
16 with crimes against humanity, treason, terrorism, etc, regarding the “covid scam”, the Aboriginal
17 Voice scam (under whatever name it is purportedly implemented) and held legally accountable
18 for the harm and also the deaths of every person that was within the jurisdiction of the State of
19 Victoria.
20 END QUOTE 20240504-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Jacinta Allan Premier & Ors
21
22
23 QUOTE 20240508-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Jacinta Allan Premier & Ors - for the peace, order,
24 and good government
25 Jacinta Allan, Premier (Australia, Victoria date) 8-5-2024
27
28 Re: 20240508-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Jacinta Allan - for the peace, order, and good government
29
31 Madam,
32 a copy of this document will also be provided to Banyule City Council, Buloke Shire
33 Council, GWMWater, ATO and others.
34
35 The term “for the peace, order, and good government” may for many have no particular
36 meaning however, where it is enshrined in the constitution then as the Framers of the
37 Constitution made very clear:
38
40 QUOTE Mr. CARRUTHERS:
41 This is a Constitution which the unlettered people of the community ought to be able
42 to understand.
43 END QUOTE
44 .
46 QUOTE
47 The Right Hon. C.C. KINGSTON (South Australia)[9.21]: I trust the Drafting Committee
48 will not fail to exercise a liberal discretion in striking out words which they do not
49 understand, and that they will put in words which can be understood by persons
50 commonly acquainted with the English language.
51 END QUOTE
52
54 QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-

Page 81
1 We want a people's Constitution, not a lawyers' Constitution.

2 END QUOTE
3
5 QUOTE Mr. SYMON (South Australia).-
6 That this is not like an Act of Parliament which we are passing. It is not in the position
7 which Mr. Barton has described, of choosing or setting up a code of laws to interpret the
8 common law of England. This Constitution we are framing is not yet passed. It has to
9 be handed over not to a Convention similar to this, not to a small select body of
10 legislators, but to the whole body of the people for their acceptance or rejection. It is
11 the whole body of the people whose understanding you have to bring to bear upon it,
12 and it is the whole body of the people, the more or less instructed body of the people,
13 who have to understand clearly everything in the Constitution, which affects them for
14 weal or woe during the whole time of the existence of this Commonwealth. We cannot
15 have on the platform, when this Constitution is commended to the people, lawyers on
16 both sides, drawing subtle distinctions, which may or may not be appreciated by the
17 people.
18 END QUOTE
19 .
20 Whatever lawyers/judges/politicians may pretend the wording may mean in the end it is for the
21 ordinary citizen to take the ordinary meaning as existed at the time of the creation of the
22 constitution.
23
24 While politicians may claim they pursue “peace” while in reality they are unconstitutionally
25 supporting war, etc.
26
27 While politicians may claim that “order” means whatever they fabricate it the rule of law, for the
28 ordinary person it rather means orderly conduct within the confines of the law and not in
29 violation to it.
30
31 While politicians may claim that “good government” is whatever they desire to make it out to be
32 for the ordinary person good government is not that politicians are getting kick backs to interfere
33 with the citizens rights for doing what their instructions are from those who are financing those
34 politicians.
35
36 Lawyers and judges far too often, at least in my view, are betraying their clients with backdoor
37 arrangements.
38
39 We have lawyers who when daring to stand up for their clients are in one way or another
40 punished and even suspended from practicing because the judges who make the decisions are so
41 to say bound by their instructors to do as they are told.
42
43 “LAWFARE” isn’t just using the “LAW” to pursue a “WAR” against those who do not toe the
44 line in the US of A but has been enshrined in Australian political and legal and even medical
45 system.
46
47 Who can forget the politicians bending over backwards for their foreign enemy powers to pursue
48 the catastrophic mandate system for the “covid scam”, spending tens if not hundreds of millions
49 of dollars to get the media/Big Tech, etc, on site robbing the monies from Consolidated Revenue
50 Funds, to also silence those who dared to speak out.
51

Page 82
1 We have for decades this mania about global cooling, global warming, climate change, all for no
2 other purposes but for politicians to serve their foreign and homegrown enemy powers at cost of
3 ordinary Australians. In my view it doesn’t serve the constitutional purposes “for the peace,
4 order, and good government”!
5
6 There is this video “Climate The Movie” and I decided to go through it. I realise that likely
7 most people cannot bother to watch the entire video of about 1 hour 19 minutes and 53 seconds,
8 and so to bring some of the message across I have below reproduced some images. It doesn’t
9 reflect the entire video content but the charts themselves ought to be noted! Some of the experts
10 in the video The Climate Movie made clear they had to play along with this climate change
11 hysteria to keep being funded to do their work. One expert stated something like if he was to
12 claim that cockroaches mating causes climate change then he would get funding to investigate
13 this issue. Many of those receiving funding may not have a clue as to what climate issues are
14 about! In my view the onus is now upon every government and its officials as to prove, not just
15 assume, that ‘climate change” is really manmade issue and not merely a “climate scam” to enrich
16 the so-called elite at the cost of the ordinary person.
17
18 We know now, well those who are open minded, that the “covid scam” did rather increase the
19 death toll and caused many to die needlessly, many of them actually having been murdered in
20 hospitals! Now we need to stop this “climate change” madness and hold the politicians, their
21 financial backers, the lawyers, judges, the mediate, big tech, etc all legally accountable.
22
23 While the Federal Government seems to be on the WHO (World Health Organisation)
24 bandwagon that even it can declare a “pandemic” merely about “climate change” we need
25 therefore to throw open the debate and perhaps imprison all of them pushing this “climate scam”.
26 There are farmers/growers families, etc, who for many generations have worked hard to try to
27 make a living in providing food on the table for the ordinary Australians but politicians with
28 their collaborators couldn’t give a darn about the harm they inflict upon others, as was with the
29 “covid scam” because they hold themselves above the rule of law. Well, not if I can pursue
30 matters to hold them legally accountable.
31
32 Let us now consider images of the video ; Climate The Movie:
33
34 QUOTE
35
36
37
Page 83
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
Page 84
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Page 85
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Page 86
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Page 87
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 END QUOTE
13
14 Remember the hockey stick picture above about alleged dramatic increase?
15
16 OK, let for arguments sake deal with rain.
17
18 For weeks or even months there is no rain, and suddenly on day it starts pouring rain. If you were
19 now to put it in a chart then it would show a flat line for days, weeks or even months on end and
20 suddenly this so-called hockey stick of a dramatic increase of rain in the one day. Never mind it
21 may not rain again for days, weeks or months after that as it served the purposes to scare the
22 living daylights of the gullible braindead persons that earth is flooding because of this one rain
23 event.
24

Page 88
1 As the Movie indicates reducing CO2 might in fact result to the destruction of earth fauna, etc,
2 because below 180 parts this can have a catastrophic consequences, and we are already close to
3 it.
4
5 We need more CO2 not less in the air.
6
7 If you put a plant in a sealed container and suck the CO2 out of it you likely will find the plant
8 will die due to lack of CO2.
9
10 What people have been doing is to scare the living daylight out of children and when they grow
11 up they likely lack the ability to use common sense to evaluate issues open minded.
12
13 A competent politicians would demand from any advisor about climate issues to show reliable
14 evidence that indeed there is a real danger regarding climate issues that require drastic action and
15 the monies spend on it and not merely to keep numerous people in a job costing the taxpayers a
16 fortune while in reality nothing is being achieved.
17
18 No doubt there will be people who will argue that the wording “for the peace, order, and good
19 government” must be considered in its proper context!
20
22 QUOTE
23 Part V—Powers of the Parliament
24 51 Legislative powers of the Parliament [see Notes 10 and 11]
25 The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace,
26 order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to:
27 END QUOTE
28
29 Well, “taxation” is a Commonwealth legislative power albeit the Framers of the Constitution
30 acknowledged that the states could legislate as to taxation for so far the Commonwealth had not
31 done so in regard of land taxation, etc. The commonwealth commenced to legislate on 11
32 November 1908 for Commonwealth land taxation and so that was the end for the States to do so,
33 however other areas not covered by the Commonwealth the States still can exercise “concurrent”
34 legislative powers. Meaning that the states actually are exercising Commonwealth “concurrent”
35 legislative powers and must do so “for the peace, order, and good government”.
36
37 Also the States are created in Section 106:
38
40 QUOTE
41 Chapter V—The States
42 106 Saving of Constitutions
43 The Constitution of each State of the Commonwealth shall, subject to this Constitution,
44 continue as at the establishment of the Commonwealth, or as at the admission or
45 establishment of the State, as the case may be, until altered in accordance with the
46 Constitution of the State.
47
48 107 Saving of Power of State Parliaments
49 Every power of the Parliament of a Colony which has become or becomes a State, shall,
50 unless it is by this Constitution exclusively vested in the Parliament of the
51 Commonwealth or withdrawn from the Parliament of the State, continue as at the
Page 89
1 establishment of the Commonwealth, or as at the admission or establishment of the State,

2 as the case may be.
3
4 108 Saving of State laws
5 Every law in force in a Colony which has become or becomes a State, and relating to any
6 matter within the powers of the Parliament of the Commonwealth, shall, subject to this
7 Constitution, continue in force in the State; and, until provision is made in that behalf by
8 the Parliament of the Commonwealth, the Parliament of the State shall have such
9 powers of alteration and of repeal in respect of any such law as the Parliament of the
10 Colony had until the Colony became a State.
11 QUOTE
12
13 The purported 1926 Victorian State land taxation clearly was after the commonwealth already
14 had taken exclusive legislative powers as to “land taxation”, and hence the ability for the State to
15 legislate was no more.
16
17 37-0114 (Asked the using same link, and yet answer is not exactly the same.)
18 QUOTE Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the Treasurer NSW
19 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Are+you+aware+that+Barry+
20 Collier+MP+Parliamentarian+Secretary+Assisting+the+Treasurer+NSW+on+2+March+2011+cl
21 aimed+%28to+me%29+that+the+States+had+legislative+powers+regarding+land+taxation+retu
22 rned+to+them%3F+Do+you+accept+this+is+possible+when+the+constitution+doesn%E2%80%
23 99t+provide+for+this+mechanism+to+return+exclusive+Commonwealth+power+back+to+the+
24 States%3F
25 Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the Treasurer
26 NSW on 2 March 2011 claimed (to me) that the States had legislative powers regarding
27 land taxation returned to them? Do you accept this is possible when the constitution
28 doesn’t provide for this mechanism to return exclusive Commonwealth power back to the
29 States?
30
31 INSERT by G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
32 This response was provided upon the same question that was done on 25 March 2024 albeit as
33 this response refer to the “20240327” date this underlines that when the same question is asked
34 days later there can be a different response. Meaning, that the questions I at the time in pdf but
35 then seek to do in word document and so go back to the same link, I may have a different
36 answer. Just to point out this is not a DOUBLE in error but rather to show that an identical
37 question by the same person my end up differently. How different cannot be predicted.
39
41 Answer:
42 No, it is not possible for the States to have legislative powers regarding land taxation
43 returned to them if the Constitution does not provide for such a mechanism. The
44 Australian Constitution clearly outlines the division of powers between the Commonwealth
45 and the States, and taxation powers are predominantly held by the Commonwealth
46 government.
47 The power to levy taxes, including land taxation, is a fundamental aspect of governance
48 that falls under the exclusive domain of the Commonwealth government as per Section
49 51(ii) of the Australian Constitution. This section grants the Commonwealth Parliament
50 the authority to make laws with respect to taxation, which includes income tax but also
51 extends to other forms of taxation.

Page 90
1 While there are instances where certain powers can be delegated or shared between the
2 Commonwealth and the States through specific agreements or arrangements, any return of
3 exclusive Commonwealth power back to the States would require a constitutional
4 amendment. Without such an amendment, it is legally untenable for the States to
5 unilaterally claim legislative powers over areas that are constitutionally assigned to the
6 Commonwealth.
7 In summary, unless there has been a constitutional amendment or a specific legal provision
8 allowing for such a transfer of power regarding land taxation from the Commonwealth
9 back to the States, it is not feasible for Barry Collier MP or any State entity to assert
10 legislative authority in this matter.
11 Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used:
12 1. Australian Constitution: The primary legal document that establishes the
13 framework for Australia’s federal system of government and delineates the
14 distribution of powers between the Commonwealth and State governments.
15 2. Taxation Laws: Relevant federal legislation and regulations governing taxation in
16 Australia, including provisions related to land taxation and other forms of levies.
17 3. Legal Commentaries on Constitutional Law: Scholarly works and expert analyses on
18 constitutional law in Australia that provide insights into issues related to federalism,
19 division of powers, and constitutional amendments.
21 5 results
22
23 Mr Barry Joseph COLLIER, OAM, BComm, DipEd, DipLaw, GAICD ( ...
24 https//www.parliament.nsw.gov.au › members › Pages › member-details.aspx
25 Mr Barry Joseph COLLIER, OAM, BComm, DipEd, DipLaw, GAICD ( ...
26 Member of the NSW Legislative Assembly, 19 Oct 2013, 06 Mar 2015 ; Parliamentary Secretary
27 Assisting the Attorney General, Assisting the Treasurer and Assisting ...
28
29 20240327-Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Buloke Shire Council & Ors
30 https//www.scribd.com › document › 717556566 › 20240327-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-Buloke-Shire-Council-Ors
31 20240327-Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Buloke Shire Council & Ors
32 36 Assisting the Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011 claimed 37 38 As Barry Collier MP
33 Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011 39 ...
34
36 https//en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki › Barry_Collier_(politician)
38 He was a Labor Party member of the New South Wales Legislative Assembly from 1999 to 2011
39 and from 2013 to 2015, representing the electorate of Miranda.
40
42 https//www.parliament.nsw.gov.au › la › department › Documents › department-of-the-legislative-assembly-annual-
43 report-for-2009-2010 › LA%20Annual%20Report%20200910.pdf
45 parliamentary recess between december 2010 and the march 2011 election should provide
46 staffing resources to complete some of these projects.
47
49 https//www.aph.gov.au › parliamentary_business › committees › house_of_representatives_committees
51 This did not have the effect of preventing the. States from imposing land tax, but rather returned
52 taxation powers back to them. Accordingly ...
53 END QUOTE Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the Treasurer NSW
54
Page 91
1 We had this elaborate “covid scam” and it plunged much of the world in to a financial disaster.
2 The politicians refused to be open minded and in particular considering my writings to the
3 Commonwealth as well as to the State of Victoria they blatantly ignored any proper
4 communication, and in fact sought to punish those daring to expose the rot, and somehow are the
5 once seeking to inflict further harm upon the many by claiming some “covid-10 levy” against
6 property owners, etc, well I got news for you. It is and remains to be unconstitutional.
7 As I understand it when a person commits a crime then the courts can hold that person legally
8 liable for any harm and damages inflicted by this criminal conduct. As such, let the Courts
9 confiscate the estate of all the politicians and their collaborators including any pension
10 entitlements to send out the message that when you act blatantly in violation to the meaning of
11 and unduly inflicted harm upon others then you will be held legally accountable.
12
13 Likewise, if you persist in this “climate scam” then you shall be personally held legally
14 accountable for any harm and that includes financial harm that was inflicted upon the victims.
15
16 Every politicians and their officials who are pushing this “climate scam” must provide to electors
17 all and any details/information they relied upon whenever making a decision.
18
19 As I wrote in the past councils were charging property owners for recycling cost only to then
20 dump the recycling material in the general waste. Also, by exporting the recycle material to other
21 countries where then a lot would end up in the ocean. As such, councils were involved in an
22 elaborate fraud to pretend to care about the environment while in reality acting opposite to it.
23
24 A warning that the images reproduced above are not to be taken represent the entire set out of the
25 video Climate The Movie. It is merely to reflect some points but the entire video should be
26 watched to gain a proper understanding what it exposes.
27 END QUOTE 20240508-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Jacinta Allan Premier & Ors - for the peace,
28 order, and good government
29
30 We need to sort out and deal with them appropriately depending is they are one or more of the
31 following:
32
33 MURDERER(S)
34
35 TERRORIST(S)
36
37 TRAITOR(S)
38
39 COLLABORATOR(S)
40
41 LACKIES
42
43 Too many have suffered and too many have died and we need to pursue JUSTICE for them all!
44
45 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
46
47 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
48 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
49 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

50 (Our name is our motto!)

20240607-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl 110C-Deadly Pursuit & Arrest, Etc

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

20240607-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl 110C-Deadly Pursuit & Arrest, Etc

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

20240607-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl 110C-Deadly Pursuit & Arrest, Etc

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Page 1

1 Let’s look at the latest EXCESS DEATHS DATA:

7-6-2024 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 6 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 As Scott L.J. said in Blackpool Corporation v. Locker (1948) 1 KB 349, at

7-6-2024 Page 8 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 12 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Palmer v Western Australia [2021] HCA 5 (24 February 2021)

7-6-2024 Page 20 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 I didn’t tell you though.

1 They are not reporting.

1 So, then how do we punish them?

7-6-2024 Page 27 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 28 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 31 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 32 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

32 Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used in Answering this Question:

331. Australian Electoral Commission (AEC)

13. Court Records

1 According to www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Questions Search Engine:

2 Yes, in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I successfully challenged the validity of the Australian

4 Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used in Answering this Question:

51. University of South Australia (Sue Milne)

1 Constitutional cases: October 2022

7-6-2024 Page 38 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates

7-6-2024 Page 40 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 42 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 was an unconstitutional “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION” bioweapon” specifically designed to

7-6-2024 Page 44 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Poland 38,480,000 33,230,780 5,249,220 13.641%

7-6-2024 Page 46 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 48 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 49 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 (Image 1979 & 1980)

7-6-2024 Page 52 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 54 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 I am asking the smartest representatives of this world.

1 I’m a seeker of the truth, but not of this world

7-6-2024 Page 56 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 13 August 2021 38 pages 220 pages Supplement 6

7-6-2024 Page 61 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 62 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 5 March 2022 26 pages 2077 pages Supplement 52

7-6-2024 Page 64 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 66 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 68 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 70 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 72 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 73 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 The Debate Over the Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous ...

7-6-2024 Page 77 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 80 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 We want a people's Constitution, not a lawyers' Constitution.

7-6-2024 Page 81 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

7-6-2024 Page 87 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 establishment of the Commonwealth, or as at the admission or establishment of the State,

7-6-2024 Page 89 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

49 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®