Nutrition Sensitive Agri Food Systems Strategy

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy
National Nutrition (2024

Sensitive Agri-Food Systems
– 2030)
Strategy (2024 – 2030)
Ensure availability
Ensure availability
& accessibility
and accessibility 1 6 Diversiﬁed
Diversified foodfood
consumption
consumption
Enhance the
Enhance the
2
Strengthen food
5
resilience of Strengthen food
resilience of NNS-AFSS & nutrition
NNS-AFSS
vulnerable
vulnerable & nutrition
governance
communities
communities governance
Post harvest, Address women,

PHM, value
value
addition& &
addition food
food 3 4 youth Address
&
youth
vulnerable
women,
and
group
safety
safety
vulnerable group
2024
Addis
AddisAbaba
2024
Ababa
Addis Ababa
National Nutrition
Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems
Strategy (2024
(2024 – 2030)
Contents
Operational Definitions...................................................................................................................................i
Purpose of the Strategy .................................................................................................................................ii
Acknowledgment ..........................................................................................................................................iv
Chapter 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................1
1.1. Background ............................................................................................................................................1
1.2. Policy and strategy analysis of Nutrition in the agri-food system ...............................2
Chapter 2. Scope, Rationale, Theory of Change and Guiding Principles...............................5
2.1. Scope ........................................................................................................................................................5
2.2. Rationale.................................................................................................................................................5
2.3. Theory of Change ..............................................................................................................................5
2.4. Guiding Principles................................................................................................................................8
Chapter 3. Goal and strategic objectives.................................................................................................9
3.1. Goal ...........................................................................................................................................................9
3.2. Strategic Objectives ..........................................................................................................................9
3.2.1. SO 1: Ensure the availability and accessibility of diverse, safe, and
nutritious food...........................................................................................................................10
3.2.2. SO 2: Enhance the resilience of vulnerable communities in agrarian,
agro-pastoral, and pastoral settings ...............................................................................28
3.2.3. SO 3: Enhance post-harvest technology, value-addition, quality, and safety
management of food and feed ...........................................................................................37
3.2.4. SO 4: Enhance the consumption of diversified, nutritious, safe, and
healthy diet...................................................................................................................................48
3.2.5. SO 5: Establish/ strengthen food and nutrition organizational structure
and implementation capacity in the agriculture sector and its affiliate
organizations..............................................................................................................................60
3.2.6. SO 6: Ensure empowerment and engagement of women, youth and
vulnerable groups in the nutrition-sensitive agri-food system ..........................66
Chapter 4. Implementation arrangement..............................................................................................74
4.1. Key implementing actors and their role ................................................................................74
4.2. Assumptions and Risks...................................................................................................................76
4.3 Monitoring, evaluation, and learning Framework ..............................................................78
4.4. Costing of the National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food ................................................92
List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
ARI Agricultural Research Institutes
AISCO Agricultural Input Supply Corporation
ATI Agricultural Transformation Institute
BDI Bio-Diversity Institute
BoA Bureau of Agriculture
BoE Bureau of Education
BoLS Bureau of lobar and skill
BoTRI Bureau of Trade and Regional Integration
BoWE Bureau of Water and Energy
BoWSA Bureau of Women and Social Affairs
CAADP Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program
Coops Cooperatives
CSS Central Statistical Service
CSOs Civil society organizations
DPs Development Partners
DRM Disaster risk management
EAA Ethiopian Agriculture Authority
EAEIA Ethiopian Association of Environmental Impact Assessment
EABC Ethiopian Agricultural Businesses Corporation
EBDI Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute
ECAE Ethiopian Conformity Assessment Enterprise
ECC Ethiopian Customs Commission
ECTA Ethiopian Coffee and Tea Authority
ECX Ethiopia Commodity Market
EDRMC Ethiopian Disaster Risk Management Commission

EEPA Ethiopian Environmental Protection Authority
EFDA Ethiopian Food and Drug Authority
EFD Ethiopian Forestry Development
EFBPI Ethiopian food, beverage & Pharmaceutical Institute
EHA Emergency humanitarian action
EIAR Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Institute

EMI Ethiopian Management Institute
EIC Ethiopian Livestock Research Institute
ELRI Ethiopia’s Investment Commission
EWLA Ethiopian Women Lawyers Association (EWLA)
ESA Ethiopia Standard Authority
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization
FBDG Food-based dietary guideline
FCC Federal Cooperative Commission
FDA Food and Drug Authority
FNP Food and Nutrition Policy
FSRP Food System Resilience Program
FTC Famer Training Center
GEWE Gender equality and women’s empowerment
HH Household
HLI Higher Learning Institution
ILRI International Livestock Research Institute
IOM International Organization for Migration
IPDC Industrial Parks Development Corporation (IPDC)
LDI Livestock Development Institute
MFI Microfinance Institutes
MoCT Ministry of Construction and Technology
MOTL Ministry of Transport and Logistics
MOA Ministry of Agriculture
MoE Ministry of Education
MoH Ministry of Health
MOI Ministry of Industry
MoLS Ministry of Labor and skills
MoR Ministry of Revenue
MoTRI Ministry of Trade and Regional Integration
MoWSA Ministry of Women and Social Affairs
MoWE Ministry of Water and Energy
NBE National Bank of Ethiopia
NGOs Non-Government organizations
NNS-AFS National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy
NS-AFS Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems
NVI National Veterinary Institute
OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
PS Private Sectors
PPSE Plant Protection Society of Ethiopia
RARIs Regional Agriculture Research Institutes
RED&FS Rural Economic Development and Food Security
SBCC Social Behavioral Change Communication
SCI Save the Children International
SD Seqota Declaration
SDG Sustainable Development Goals
SME Small and Medium Size Enterprise
SOPs Standard Operating Procedures
TVET Technical and Vocational Education and Training
UN United Nation
UNICEF United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund
WFP World Food Program
Operational Definitions
Agri-food systems are a set of interlinked actions comprised of
actors involved in the agriculture sector (from farmers, agribusiness
firms, processors, distributors to consumers), the activities that
Agri-food systems
these actors engage in, and the larger enabling environment
which includes the policies, standards, and investments that affect
sustainable production and market access.
The sub-sector of the manufacturing that beneficiates primary

Agro-processing materials and intermediate goods from agricultural, fisheries and
forestry-based sectors and make them usable as food or feed.
Biofortified crops refer to conventionally bred crops that have
been deliberately fortified with higher levels of essential nutrients,
such as vitamins, minerals, and other beneficial compounds. The
Bio-fortified crops
purpose of biofortification is to address and mitigate micronutrient
deficiencies, also known as hidden hunger, which is prevalent in
many developing countries.
are products that could last and store for a long period of time
Durable products due to their less minimum moisture content, such as cereal and
legumes
Refers to collection of principles to apply for on-farm production

Good Agricultural and postproduction processes, resulting in safe and healthy food
Practices (GAP) and non-food agricultural products, while taking into account
economic, social and environmental sustainability.
Refers to a set of guidelines and practices designed to ensure

Good Animal
the welfare, health, and productivity of livestock animals.
Husbandry
These practices encompass various aspects of animal care,
Practices
management, and facility design to promote humane treatment,
(GAHP)
disease prevention, and optimal production outcomes.
Nutrient-dense foods refer to foods that have a high concentration
of essential nutrients relative to their calorie content. These foods
Nutrient-dense are rich in vitamins, minerals, proteins, healthy fats, and other
food beneficial compounds that are important for human health and
well-being.
National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

i
A facility or institution that serves as a hub for promoting and
Nutrition educating individuals and communities on proper nutrition and
demonstration healthy food preparation and eating practices. It is a dedicated
center space where various activities and demonstrations related to
nutrition and food preparation and processing take place.
Nutrition- A food-based approach to agricultural development that puts

Sensitive nutritionally rich foods, dietary diversity, and bio fortification at the
Agriculture heart of overcoming malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies.
Nutrition- Innovative tools, techniques, and approaches that are designed to

Sensitive enhance agricultural production and food systems with a specific
Technologies focus on improving nutrition outcomes.
Agricultural products, which have a shorter shelf-life, if not
Perishable
preserved properly. These include fruits, vegetables, meats, fish,
products
poultry, and dairy products.
A person who has long-term physical, mental, intellectual or
Persons with sensory impairments which in interaction with various barriers
disabilities may hinder him/her full and effective participation in society on
an equal basis with others.
Any actor/individual that uses at least one technology that

Postharvest
can mitigate losses of agricultural produce during harvesting,
technology
transportation, storage, processing, packaging, distribution,
users
marketing, and utilization.
Refers to a systematic approach that utilizes communication
Social and strategies and techniques to influence and promote positive
behavioral changes in social norms, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of
change individuals or communities. It is designed to address specific
communication issues or challenges, such as health behaviors, environmental
(SBCC) conservation, gender equality, education, or other social issues.
The additions of time, place, and/or form utility to a commodity

in order to meet the preferences or tastes of the consumer. Value-
Value addition added food products are raw or pre-processed commodities whose
value has been increased through the addition of ingredients or
processes that make them more attractive.
Refer to segments of the population that are more susceptible to
Vulnerable experiencing harm, discrimination, or disadvantage due to various
groups factors such as their social, economic, geographic location, or
physical circumstances.

ii
Purpose of the Strategy
Ethiopia introduced its National Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture (NSA) Strategy in

November 2016 with the vision of unleashing the full potential of the agriculture sector
for improving the nutritional status of Ethiopians including mothers and children. The
rationale of the strategy was to give guidance on how to integrate nutrition objectives
and indicators into the existing agriculture policy and program landscape. The strategy
has been in effect at national level for five years (2017-2021). The NSA Strategy has
effectively leveraged nutrition into the agriculture sector’s agenda. Policies and strategies
introduced since 2017 have incorporated bold strategic directions and objectives for
integrating nutrition and building the organizational capacity for implementing NSA.
After the endorsement of the strategy, nutrition structures at federal and regional levels
(offices, directorates, case teams, focal persons, experts) have been created at different
levels of the sector. The strategy also helped to boost the production and consumption
of nutrient dense food commodities, although not at the required level
During the course of the strategy implementation, many initiatives and programs has
been launched such as the national food and nutrition policy and strategy, revised
agriculture and rural development policy, the Ethiopia food system transformation
roadmap, sectoral ten year plan and other important programs that need the attention
of the strategy.
Following these national policy and strategy documents, this Nutrition-Sensitive Agri-
food System Strategy (2024–2030) has been revised considering the recommendations
from the previous NSA Strategy (2016–2021) and emerging national and international
food and nutrition priorities based on evidence in the local context. It clearly outlines
sectors leadership and collaborative roles, strategic actions, and key performance
indicators.
This strategy document serves as a binding guideline for actors and stakeholders
to tackle malnutrition and improve the livelihood of households through boosting
production of nutrient dense commodities, improving income generation activities,
empowering women and adolescents, fostering collaboration and coordination with
accountability among stakeholders and improving economy of the households.

iii
Acknowledgment
The development of the Nutrition-Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy involved

the collaboration and contributions of numerous stakeholders who have expertise
in agriculture, nutrition, health, education, gender, and social science. We extend our
heartfelt appreciation to the technical team members composed of the following
organizations and individuals who played a vital role in the development of this strategy
and for their invaluable support and expertise: Government organizations (Ministry
of Agriculture (MoA), Ministry of Health (MoH), Ministry of Education (MoE), Bahir
Dar University, Jimma University, Haramaya University, Hawassa University, Ethiopian
Institute of Agricultural Research Institute (EIAR), non-governmental organizations
(Save the Children and Alive and Thrive), and United Nations (UN) organizations,
particularly the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). We would like to express
our sincere gratitude to Mrs. Alemtsehay Sergawi, the head of the Food and Nutrition
Office under the Ministry of Agriculture, and her team for initiating the preparation of
this national strategic document. We extend our gratitude to the core team members,
comprising representatives from the Crop Development Lead Executive, Horticulture
Development Lead Executive, Livestock and Fishery Development Lead Executive,
Food and Nutrition Office, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Save the
Children, FAO, and Ministry of Health (Seqota Declaration representative), for their
valuable technical guidance and shaping this strategy throughout the development
process. We would also like to acknowledge Save the Children for their exceptional
support, both in terms of technical expertise and financial assistance. Lastly, we
extend our sincere thanks to all the individuals and organizations who actively
participated in the formulation exercise and provided support in various capacities.
Your contributions have been instrumental in shaping this strategy and will play a
crucial role in advancing the nutrition-sensitive agri-food systems in our country. The
Ministry of Agriculture expresses deepest appreciation and gratitude to every one of
you for your commitment and dedication to this important endeavor.

iv
Chapter 1. Introduction
Background
Despite multi-sectoral interventions in the country, ensuring food and nutrition

security has been a challenge. Every year, about 8 million Ethiopians depend on
productive safety net programs (PSNP) for their food baskets; the prevalence of stunting
and wasting remains stunningly high at 39% and 11% respectively; more than 19% of
women of reproductive age are under-weight; micronutrient deficiencies, such as iron,
zinc, vitamin A, vitamin D, folate, and vitamin B12 are common .
The recent active transition in dietary practice has made the nutrition transition evident
in the country adding up to the already struggling nutrition security initiatives. Obesity
and diet-related non-communicable diseases, such as diabetes and cardiovascular
disease are at their all-time high. Rapidly growing population, rain-fed agriculture
which is prone to adverse climatic conditions, widespread environmental degradation,
migratory and chronic crop pests, low productivity of the agricultural sector, and
limited market access were the underlying causes for food insecurity and malnutrition.
Additionally, gender inequality, inadequate infant feeding practices, high childhood and
maternal illnesses, poor sanitation and hygiene, and high poverty rates contributed to
increased malnutrition1.
The Ethiopian government is actively seeking investments to improve the socio-

economic well-being of its people. To overcome obstacles to development, the
government is prioritizing human capital development by focusing on improving
nutrition and health. In this regard, the government has implemented a range of
policies and programs targeted at early childhood development to leading high-
impact national programs directed at improving the food and nutrition security of
the country. Addressing the food and nutrition security challenges of the country falls
under the domain of the agriculture sector, one of the key sectors in this endeavor.
MOA is responsible for finding solutions and implementing strategies to improve the
nutritional status of the population. .
Agriculture needs to be nutrition-sensitive to improve nutritious food availability

and access and attain global nutrition targets. Nutrition-sensitivity of agricultural

1
investments maximizes agricultural contribution to nutrition mounting nutrition
lenses to the investments. To guide the agriculture sector’s strategies and working
documents from a nutrition perspective, the MoA has designed and implemented the
national nutrition-sensitive agricultural (NNSA) strategy from 2016 to 2021.The strategy
has been assessed for it impact and it was found that helped to leveraged nutrition
to the agriculture sector. Most of the agriculture policies and strategies initiated since
2016 have integrated nutrition-related strategic objectives and indicators. Nutrition
activities are being mainstreamed into the day-to-day activity of the sector than before.
The assessment also highlighted g a strong contribution of the late NSA strategy for
improved availability and accessibility of nutritious food and strengthening the system-
level capacity of the sector4., The end-line evaluation made recommendations to be
considered in the revised strategy such as : emerging themes (Ethiopia food systems
transformation, food and nutrition policy strategy, sector ten plan, food systems
resilience program and climate-smart agriculture), evolving problems (obesity and
other diet-related NCDs), When the NSA is to be revised, the required resources and
detailed implementation plans have to be developed, by specifying the contributions
from the agricultural sector and partners. Variability in terms of agro-ecologies, farming
systems, and other regional differences should be considered during the revision of
the NSA strategy. A separate and adequate budget should be allocated by the MOA
to implement nutrition interventions and support coordination efforts. Additional
resources should also be mobilized by development partners
The Nutrition-Sensitive Agri-food Systems Strategy (2024–2030) has been developed

considering the recommendations from the previous NSA Strategy (2016–2021) and
emerging national and international nutrition priorities based on evidence in the local
context.
1.1. Policy and strategy analysis of Nutrition in the agri-food systems
Ensuring the food and nutrition security of the country is a top priority of the Ethiopian
government. Ethiopia stands out as one of the countries with robust policies and
strategies aimed at improving food and nutrition security. It has actively participated
in international initiatives and commitments to address local and global challenges.
In this regard, line ministries with the mandate to address food and nutrition security

2
have created sound policy and strategy frameworks for actors to transform the food
system and tackle malnutrition.
The NSA strategy (2016-2021) of the country has effectively leveraged nutrition into
the agriculture sector’s agenda. Policies and strategies introduced since 2017 have
incorporated bold strategic directions and objectives for integrating nutrition and
building the organizational capacity for implementing the NSA. The revised Agriculture
and Rural Development Policy (2021) provided strategic directions for mainstreaming
nutrition, reducing food and nutrient loss, assuring food safety, and establishing
enabling institutional structure and coordination. The MoA’s ten-year Perspective Plan
(2020) recognized that beyond productivity, the agriculture sector must work towards
advancing production and dietary diversity both in agrarian and pastoral settings. The
Horticulture Policy (2021), Horticulture Roadmap (2021), and Agricultural Extension
Strategy (2017) also considered the same.
The GoE has expressed its dedication to food and nutrition security through the
implementation of both nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions, as
stated in the National Food and Nutrition Policy (FNP) (2018) and Food and Nutrition
Strategy (FNS) (2021). The FNP focuses on ensuring the availability, accessibility, and
utilization of diverse, safe, and nutritious food, as well as improving food safety and
quality throughout the entire food supply chain. Additionally, it aims to address post-
harvest losses and establish effective food and nutrition governance. The Seqota
Declaration (SD), initiated in 2015, aims to eradicate all forms of malnutrition in children
under the age of 2 by 2030.
Ethiopia is fully committed to achieving the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals

(SDG). In alignment with the UN Foody Systems initiative, the GoE launched the
Ethiopian Food Systems transformation agenda to define Ethiopia’s vision and pathway
for national food systems transformation. It has recently published EFS Transformation
Vision 2030.
The plan emphasizes the integration of nutrition into the agriculture sector,
establishment of structure, fulfillment of standard meal frequency, highlighting the
importance of promoting production diversity and enhancing nutrition literacy.
Ambitious production targets for crops, such as fruits and vegetables, are outlined in

3
the plan. The MoA’s ten-year Strategic Plan (2020-2030) focuses on promoting the
commercialization of farming practices both in the medium and small-scale producers.
Additionally, the Livestock Master Plan (2015-2020) outlines investment priorities for
poultry development, as well as increasing milk, red meat, and feed production. The
Agricultural Growth Project (AGP) was introduced to realize the national vision of
becoming a lower-middle-income country by 2025. The program implemented in
two phases had the goal of increasing agricultural productivity and commercialization
of key crop and livestock products in selected woredas of the country. Responding to
the calls to improve the availability, accessibility, and utilization of nutritious foods, the
second phase had a household dietary diversification objective.
The NS AFS enters the realm of rich food and nutrition policy with a strong alignment
with existing strategies. Ensuring its successful implementation requires strong
leadership from all relevant ministries and private sector to foster collaboration
and achieve meaningful results. The Nutrition-Sensitive Agri-Food System Strategy
is a crucial addition to the country’s and sectors’ working documents, providing
a comprehensive and focused strategic direction to help achieve the country
commitment to the SDG plan.

4
Chapter 2. Scope, Rationale, Theory of Change and Guiding
Principles
Principles
2.1. Scope
National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (NS-AFSS) designed for MoA
at all levels and its affiliated institutions, collaborating line ministries, academia, civil
society organizations (CSOs), and private sectors. This strategy will serve as a guiding
document for the next seven years (2024–2030).
2.2. Rationale
The National Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture Strategy (NNSAS; 2017-2021) has been

updated and revised to align with the current national priorities and address identified
gaps through the NNSAS end-term evaluation. The national priorities include Food
and Nutrition Policy (2018), Food and Nutrition Strategy (2021), the Ministry of
Agriculture Ten-year Perspective Plan, the Seqota Declaration Program, the Ethiopian
Food Systems Roadmap, and ‘Yelemat Turufat’.
The current National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (NS-AFSS;

2024-2030) provides guidance to the agriculture sector on addressing national and
international priorities in agri-food systems and nutrition. It focuses on enhancing food
and nutrition governance and institutional arrangements, addressing programming
and investment needs, establishing monitoring and evaluation systems, and ensuring
accountability at all levels. The strategy incorporates emerging demands, such as
food safety and quality, postharvest management, climate-smart agriculture, urban
agriculture, social inclusion, and livelihood improvement.
2.3. Theory of Change
The Theory of Change (ToC) for Nutrition-Sensitive Agri-food Systems provides

a logical framework to understand how the system can lead to improved food and
nutrition security as the ultimate impact. The ToC highlights the interconnectedness
and progression of various elements within the system. The desired outcomes of
the system include improved access to diverse, safe, and nutritious food, improved
resilience of vulnerable communities, reduced nutrient-dense food loss and waste,
increased consumption of diversified nutritious food, improved capacity of the
agriculture sector and empowerment of women.

5
To achieve these outcomes, the ToC identifies a range of outputs. These outputs
encompass increased production and productivity of nutrient-dense food, ensuring
beneficiaries can access this food, providing households with coping mechanisms and
climate-smart interventions, improving household incomes, promoting the adoption
of post-harvest technologies and practices, involving entities in value addition and
small-scale processing, linking farmers to agro-industry parks, establishing food
demonstration centers, strengthening Home-Grown School Feeding Programs
(HGSFP) and other feeding centers, developing and strengthening food and nutrition
structures, mainstreaming food and nutrition policies and strategies, developing
nutrition-sensitive Agri-food curricula, facilitating women’s access to productive
resources, engaging youth in nutrition-sensitive Agri-food interventions, and ensuring
vulnerable communities benefit from the system.
The activities within the nutrition-sensitive Agri-food systems that contribute to these
outputs include the development of nutrient-dense crops and livestock, effective post-
harvest management, production of feed and forage, sustainable natural resource
management, social and behavior change communication, resilience building and
coping mechanisms, empowerment of women and individuals with special needs,
food safety and quality management, and implementation of Home-Grown School
Feeding programs.
To enable and support the successful implementation of these activities, the ToC
identifies various enablers and inputs. These include the utilization of climate-
smart technologies and practices, conducting research and extension activities,
implementing relevant policies and strategies, utilizing knowledge and evidence,
considering socio-economic factors, providing necessary agricultural inputs, ensuring
political commitment and governance, allocating financial resources, and establishing
the required infrastructure.
Overall, the ToC provides a structured representation of the logical flow from enablers
and inputs to activities, outputs, outcomes, and ultimately the impact of improved food
and nutrition security in Nutrition-Sensitive Agri-food Systems. It demonstrates how
different components of the system are interconnected and contribute to achieving
the desired impact.

6
National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Theory of Change

7
2.4. Guiding Principles
The following are the key guiding principles of the NS-AFSS:
• Participatory approach and community centered

• Food based approach
• Need and evidence-based program planning and implementation
• Sense of ownership
• Inclusiveness (women, children, youth, and people’s with special needs)
• Innovative and indigenous knowledge-based
• Multi-sectoral and multi-stakeholder collaboration and coordination
• Transparency and accountability
• Building competency-based capacity of front-line service providers
• Environmental friendliness and sustainability

8
Chapter 3. Goal and strategic objectives
3.1. Goal
The overall goal of the NS-AFSS is to contribute to the improvement of food and
nutrition security of all Ethiopians through improving the availability, accessibility,
affordability, and quality of food, while promoting the consumption of diverse, safe,
and nutritious foods at all times.
3.2. Strategic Objectives
The NS-AFSS has the following six strategic objectives (SOs):
SO 1:
1: Ensure the availability and accessibility of diverse, safe, and nutritious food
SO 2:
2: Enhance the resilience of vulnerable communities in agrarian, agro-pastoral, and
pastoral settings
SO 3:
3: Enhance post-harvest technology, value-addition, quality, and safety management
of food and feed
SO 4:
4: Enhance the consumption of diversified, nutritious, safe, and healthy diet
SO 5:
5: Establish and strengthen food and nutrition organizational structure and
implementation capacity in the agriculture sector and its affiliate organizations
SO 6:
6: Ensure empowerment and engagement of women, youth and peoples with
special need in the nutrition-sensitive agri-food systems

9
3.2.1. SO 1: Ensure the availability and accessibility of diverse,
safe, and nutritious food
Outcome indicator: Number of households who have access to diverse, safe, and
nutritious food (million)
Ethiopia is a country with a large population and significant food and nutrition
insecurity challenges1. The prevalence of severe malnutrition and chronic malnutrition
is high, particularly among women and children under five years of age1. Addressing
these challenges requires a comprehensive approach to improve access to nutrient-
rich food crops and animal production through agro-ecology-based diversified,
sustainable, and climate-smart agriculture.
The production and productivity of safe and nutritious foods can be significantly
enhanced through the adoption of improved agricultural technologies and practices2.
Promoting nutrient-dense production in commercial farming, urban, peri-urban, and
homestead agriculture, and the production of underutilized and nutritious indigenous
foods can enhance access to nutritious food, improve dietary diversity, and ultimately
address malnutrition and food insecurity3. These efforts play a vital role in addressing
malnutrition and ensuring the overall well-being of the population.

10
Strategic Initiative 1: Enhance production and productivity of
nutrient-rich food crops
Output indicator 1: Volume of increment of nutrient-rich food crop production (tons)
Output indicator 2: Number of beneficiaries increased nutrient-dense crop
production (in million)

Lead/
Key performance Baseline
Core activities Target (2030) Collaborating
indicators (2023)
sectors
% of production 2.4 35 %
increment (ton) million increment
# of diversified nutrient
8 12
dense crops
Nutrient dense crop
types and productivity Lead: MoA
Production
(q/ha), Haricot bean
of diversified
(17.4), Soybean (24),
nutrient-dense
Mung bean (10.2), cow Collaborating:
food
pea (24.4), QPM (42), ARI, EAA, ECC,
OFSP (228.3), Leafy HLI, DP, ATI
vegetables (50.56) &
10%
Fruit (82.7), High Fe
increment
chickpea, High Fe & Zn Refer KPI
Potato, High Zn Rice,

Pigeon pea)
# of bio-fortified crops
promoted (QPM, OFSP, Fe
4 4
& Zn Haricot bean, Fe &
Develop and
Zn Chickpea) Lead: MoA
promote the # of bio-fortified
Collaborating:
production of crops developed (Fe &
4 4 EIAR, EAA, ECC,
bio-fortified Zn Potato & Zn Rice,
HLI, DP, ATI
crops Soybean & Mung bean
% Increase in the areas of 74,416.3 35 %

bio-fortified crops hectare) increment

11
Improve Increment in yield of
production and bio-fortified staple food 7,552,822 10 %
increment Lead: MoA
productivity crops in quintals Collaborating:
of bio fortified
EIAR, EAA,
staple food
# of demonstrations ECC, HLI, DP,
crops through 50,000 100% ATI
promotion and conducted at HH level
demonstration
# of nutrient-dense
crops promoted using 8 12
irrigation
% Increase in irrigated
38,069
Promote the areas covered with 5%
production nutrient-dense crops increment Lead: MoA

of nutrient- from the baseline Collaborating:
dense crops # of irrigation EIAR, EAA,
using improved technologies ECC, HLI, DP,
irrigation demonstrated to 4 ATI, MILL
6
technologies produce nutrient-
dense crops (Motor
pump, Solar pump,
drip, & Sprinkler, Pivot
& rain gun sprinkler)
# of GAP & IPM
Promote production documents
9 10
integrated pest updated (Haricot bean,
management soybean, mung bean,
Lead: MoA
(IPM) and good chickpea, cowpea,
Collaborating:
agricultural quinoa) and prepared
EIAR, EAA,
practice (GAP) (OFSP, Leafy vegetable,
ECC, HLI, DP
in nutrient- & fruits)
dense crops # of beneficiaries of 70%
production 578,165
GAPs & IPM introduced increment

12
Establish/ # of horticulture nursery
200 300
strengthen sites established Lead: MoA
horticultural Collaborating:
# of demonstration sites
nursery and 200 300 EIAR, EAA, ECC,
established
demonstration HLI, DP, ATI
sites
Support # of biotechnology
Establishment/ 15 20
centers established
strengthen crop Lead: MoA
biotechnology/ # of biotechnology Collaborating:
8 8
tissue culture centers strengthened EIAR, EAA, ECC,
centers for HLI, DP
# of tissue culture
nutrient-dense 11 11
centers strengthened
crops
Promote
integrated
soil fertility
Lead: MoA
management
Collaborating:
practices for # of beneficiaries NA 9.5 million
EIAR, EAA, HLI,
enhanced
DP
productivity of
nutrient-dense
crops
Promote organic
Area coverage in organic 21% Lead: MoA
fertilizers
fertilizer increment Collaborating:
utilization culture 106,751
EIAR, EAA, ECC,
in the crop
HLI, DP
farming systems

13
# of FTC/PTC
Build the 13,267
capacitated 50% FTC
capacity capacitated
of farmers/
pastoralist
Lead: MoA
training centers
Collaborating:
to promote and
EIAR, ECC, HLI,
disseminate # of farmers/pastoralists 17.5 21%
DP
improved adopt technologies million increment
nutrient-
dense crops
technologies
Strategic Initiative 2: Enhance livestock and fishery production

and productivity
Output indicator 1፡ Yield increment of animal products in (tons/liters/numbers)
Output indicator 2: Yield increment in feed/forage in million tons
Lead/
Key performance Baseline Target
Core activities Collaborating
indicators (2023) (2030)
sectors
# of high yielding Lead: MoA
5 9
Promote high-yielding nutritious forage Collaborating:
and nutritious forage varieties HLI, LDI, ILRI,
varieties VDFCA, EIAR,
Forage yield ton/ha 6 8 EAFIA, DP
# of feed processing 3 5
Promote feed processing
machineries Lead: MoA
machineries utilization
introduced Collaborating:
and introduce feed # of feed
HLI, LDI, ILRI,
treatment practices treatment practices
48 96 VDFCA, EIAR,
at the household & demonstrated at
EAFIA, DP
community level FTC/PTC

14
Support and promote
Concentrate feed 30% Lead: MoA
the production and 61,416
produced in tons increment Collaborating:
utilization of concentrate
HLI, LDI, ILRI,
feeds by farmers,
# of concentrate VDFCA, EIAR,
cooperatives, private 15%
feed processors 81 EAFIA, DP
sector increment
supported
Eggs produced in 2.9
Strengthen the 3.5 billion Lead: MoA
numbers billion
production and Collaborating:
Red meat in tons 607,000 1 billion
productivity of animal HLI, LDI, ILRI,
Poultry meat in tons 112,000 114,000
and animal products VDFCA, EIAR,
(dairy, beef, small Milk produced in 8.6 EAFIA, DP, EIC,
10 billons
ruminants, poultry, fish litters billion NVI, ECC, MoI,
100,000
etc.) Fish produced in tons 110,000 ton MoTRI, ELAA
ton
Promote/support private NA Lead: MoA
# of private sectors
sector extension / 1,350 Collaborating:
supported
advisory services on HLI, LDI, ILRI,
# of farmers
animal production, NA 35,000 VDFCA, EIAR,
supported
health & breeding EAFIA,
Lead: MoA
# of health facilities Collaborating:
Promote the capacity of
capacitated (two NA 26 HLI, LDI, ILRI,
animal health facilities
each region) VDFCA, EIAR,
EAFIA,
Lead: MoA
Support animal health % of household’s
18.67 21% Collaborating:
care, veterinary, and access veterinary
million increment VDFCA, NVI,
extension services extension services
DP
Lead: MoA
Promote good animal
% of households 3.7 20% Collaborating:
husbandry practices
practiced GAHP million increment HLI, LDI, ILRI,
(GAHP)
VDFCA, EIAR,

15
# of private sectors
15%
engaged in livestock NA
Promote/strengthen increment
production
the private sector Lead: MoA
engagement in red % of private sectors Collaborating:
15 %
meat, poultry, dairy, engaged in livestock NA HLI, LDI, ILRI,
increment
and fish production, product marketing VDFCA, EIAR,
processing, marketing, EAFIA,
% of private sectors
and distribution 5%
engaged in livestock NA
increment
product processing
# of beneficiaries
1 million 1.2 million
supported
# of inputs provided Lead: MoA

Support community-
for aquaculture and NA 1.2 million Collaborating:
initiated aquaculture and
fishery EIC, DP,Coop,
fishery in small and large
# of ponds utilized NA 1200 RI,MoW, ISA,
reservoirs and rivers
EAL,MoR,
# of lakes utilized 20 20
# of rivers and
25 25
reservoirs utilized

16
Strategic Initiative 3: Enhance agro-ecology-based sustainable
and climate-smart agriculture
Output indicator 1: % increment in agro-ecology-based crop cultivation

Output indicator 2: Proportion of climate-smart agricultural practices introduced
Lead/
sectors
Promote cultivation of Area covered by 15%

744,416.3 Lead: MoA
agro-ecology-based nutrient-dense crops increment
Collaborating:
nutrient-dense crops Area covered by EIAR, ECC,
and forage in hectare forage production NA 1.5 HLI, DP
(million)
Promote sustainable # of management
farmland, wetland, practices promoted Lead: MoA
and buffer zone (farmland, wetland, Collaborating:

1 5
management practices buffer zone, agro- EIAR, ECC,
for nutrient-dense crops forestry & dry land HLI, DP
farming)
# of technologies
implemented/
Lead: MoA
utilized (soil &
Capacitate and use
water conservation,
technologies for natural Collaborating:
agro-forestry 3 5
resource management
practice, range EIAR, ECC,
land management, HLI, DP
wetland & buffer
zone)
Protect & use natural
resources to produce
Lead: MoA
vegetables, fruits, 13,267
Hectare of land 15% Collaborating:
and feed, and fodder
protected increase EIAR, ECC,
through improved
HLI, DP
management practices

17
Promote cut and Lead: MoA
carry practices # of HH apply cut & 20% Collaborating:

398,932
and protection of carry practices increase VDFCA, EIAR,
pastureland DP
land used for agro- 20%

135,042
Promote agroforestry, forestry in hectares increment
area closure, and # of HHs/youths
22% Lead: MoA
integration of bee- engaged in 33,071
increment Collaborating:
keeping and multi- beekeeping EIAR, HLI, DP
purpose tree species
#r of multi-purpose 63.11. 15 %
planting
tree species planted million increment
# of water points
Increase
Promote one water developed 1.5 million Lead: MoA
by 60 %
point and fruit trees for Collaborating:
each household 63.11 10 % EIAR, HLI, DP

# of fruit trees
planted million increment

18
Strategic Initiative 4: Encourage nutrient-dense commercial
farming
Output indicator: Proportion of nutrient-dense crops and forage production from

commercial farming
Lead/
Core activities) Collaborating
sectors
# of commercial farmers 50 100
engaged in nutrient-
dense food production
# of commercial
Intensify/encourage farmers engaged in 10 20 Lead: MoA

commercial farms forage production Collaborating:
to produce nutrient- EIAR, ECC,
Amount of nutrient- 35 %
dense food and 377,641 HLI, DP, ILRI,
dense food produced increase Private sector
forage
in tons by commercial
farms
Amount of forage
100 %
produced in tons by 10
increase
commercial farmers
# of commercial 10 100%
Link commercial
farmers linked with seed
farmers with
producer companies.
seed producer Lead: MoA
# of commercial
companies/ Collaborating:
farmers accessed to
enterprises to 10 20 EIAR, ECC,
new nutrient-dense
improve access to HLI, DP, ILRI,
varieties
new nutrient-dense Private sector
# of commercial
varieties/ improve
farmers accessed to 40 80
breeds
improve breeds

19
Capacitate Lead: MoA
commercial farmers # of commercial Collaborating:
50 100
in nutrition-sensitive farmers capacitated EIAR, EIC,
agriculture ECC, HLI, DP
# of commercial farms
Encourage Lead: MoA
engaged in nutrient-
commercial farms 30 60 Collaborating:
dense production of
in the production of EIAR, EIC,
seed
nutrient-dense seed ECC, HLI, DP,
/ improved breed # of commercial farms ILRI, Private
production engaged in production 20 40 sector
of breeds
Land cultivated in 37,220

Encourage contract hectares by contract hectares 60% Lead: MoA
farming in the farming to produce increment Collaborating:
production of nutrient-dense seed EIAR, EIC,
nutrient-dense seed/ Land cultivated in ECC, HLI, DP,
improved breed hectares by contract ILRI, Private
production NA 40 sector
farming to produce
animal breeds
Promote improved Lead: MoA
# of demonstrations
cropping system in 36 100% Collaborating:
conducted
commercial farms EIAR, HLI, DP
# of commercial farms
Encourage
recruited nutrition 3 300%
commercial farms Lead: MoA
professionals
to employ food Collaborating:
# of nutrition
and nutrition EIAR, EIC, DP
professionals employed 3 15
professionals
by commercial farms,
# of insurance
Provide crop & Lead: MoA
companies engaged
animal insurance 2 20
in agri-food products
services nationally
insurance services.

20
Provide access # of agri-business
Lead: MoA
to finance for the sectors accessed to the 10 14
agribusiness sector finance
Strategic Initiative 5: Promote urban, peri-urban, and homestead

agriculture production
Output indicator: Proportion of HH engaged in urban, peri-urban and homestead
agriculture practices
Lead/
Key performance
Core activities Baseline 2030 target Collaborating
indicators
sectors
20%
# of HH engaged
increment
in poultry 0.5million Lead: MoA
Produce improved production Collaborating:
poultry and poultry
Poultry meat 25% HLI, ILRI, EIAR,
products at the 11,200
produced in tons increment EAFIA, DP, City
household level
40% Administration
Eggs produced in 290
number million
increment
Provide support for
intensive rearing # of HHs Lead: MoA
of small ruminants, supported 40% Collaborating:
150000
dairy, apiculture, increment HLI, ILRI, EIAR,
and aquaculture EAFIA, DP
activities
Promote improved
horticultural # of HHs
Lead: MoA
gardening including benefited
200,000 100% Collaborating:
mushrooms and
EIAR, HLI, DP
vertical farming in
urban areas
# of greenhouse
Introduce/strengthen 255 Lead: MoA
technologies
greenhouse 35% Collaborating:
introduced
technologies EIAR, HLI, DP
(plastic tunnels)

21
Strategic Initiative 6: Promote the production of nutritious
underutilized indigenous foods
Output indicator: Yield increment of under-utilized and nutritious indigenous foods

in million tons
Lead/
sectors
Assess and
promote edible # of edible plants Lead: MoA
plant and animal and animal spp. 15 25 Collaborating:
sources as a Identified EIAR, HLI, DP
nutritious food
# of neglected
and under-
Promote the
utilized plant/ 15 25
production and
animal source
utilization of Lead: MoA
foods promoted
neglected and Collaborating:
Yield increment
underutilized EIAR, HLI, DP
of nutritious and
plant/animal 20%
under-utilized 1.5
source foods increment
foods in million
tons
Develop
production # of production Lead: MoA
package for packages 1 10 Collaborating:
underutilized and developed EIAR, HLI, DP
neglected foods

22
Strategic Initiative 7: Strengthen research & extensions to ensure
the accessibility of technologies and practices for
healthy and nutritious foods
Output indicator 1: Number of research institutes capacitated
Output indicator 2: Number of research outputs & innovation technologies introduced
Lead/
sectors
# of technologies
released and
Develop and
promoted (pulse,
promote food and Lead: MoA
oil, cereals,
nutrition sensitive 9 7 Collaborating:
vegetables, fruits,
agriculture EIAR, HLI
root & tuber,
technologies
poultry, fishery &
dairy)
Capacitate
# of food and
agricultural Lead: MoA
nutrition-related
research institutes 1 7 Collaborating:
research institutes
with facilities and EIAR, HLI
capacitated
human resources
Conduct nutrition-
Lead: MoA
sensitive research # of research
10 15 Collaborating:
in the agricultural institutes engaged
EIAR, HLI
research institute
Foster linkage of
2 Lead: MoA
research institutes # of out growers’
Collaborating:
with out-growers’ schemes linked 5
EIAR, EIC, ECC,
for nutrient-dense with research
HLI
seed multiplication

23
Types of
environmentally
Support and Lead: MoA
friendly improved
promote Collaborating:
agricultural
environmentally EIAR, HLI,
technologies 3 4
friendly improved Ethiopia
promoted (solar
agricultural Electric
energy, biogas, grid
technologies corporation
energy sources &
wind energy)
# of animal breed
Strengthen animal
improvement Lead: MoA
breed improvement
program
research (dairy, beef, Collaborating:
strengthened 3 5
small ruminant,
(dairy, small & large ELRI, LDI, HLI,
poultry, fish and
ruminant fishery & DP, ILRI
apiculture, etc.,)
poultry)

24
Strategic Initiative 8: Strengthen agricultural inputs and services for
nutrition-sensitive agriculture
Output indicator1: Proportion of increment in input supplied
Output indicator 2: % increment of input use by beneficiaries’

Lead/
sectors
Kilogram of seeds 100%
10000
produced (vegetables) increment
Support mass # of planting materials 1
100%
production and distributed (seedlings) in
increment Lead: MoA
distribution of millions
Collaborating:
improved fruits & # of planting materials 5 EIAR, HLI, DP
100%
vegetable seeds/ distributed (cuttings) in
increment
planting materials millions
# of beneficiaries in
1 2
millions
Improved seeds produced 200%
Establish / 33,374
in quintals produced and increment
strengthen
distributed (QPM, yellow
farmers’ groups
maize & Pulses) Lead: MoA
and cooperatives
# of farmers’ groups/ Collaborating:
in the production
cooperatives engaged 100% EIAR, EAA, HLI,
and distribution 40
in production and increment ECC, EABC
of improved seed
distribution
and bio-fortified
# of beneficiaries in 100%
seed 0.4
million increment
Train youth
# of youth groups trained NA 120
groups on Lead: MoA
the rental and Collaborating:
# of youth engaged in
maintenance ECC, EIC,
rental and maintenance NA 2400
of agricultural MoWSA, EABC,
(20 youth per group)
machinery

25
Training on mass
30
production and Lead: MoA
distribution of # of producers trained 50 Collaborating:
improved animal EIAR, ELRI, DP,
breeds
Enhance market Lead: MoA

linkages for # of market linkages 100% Collaborating:
30
agriculture input created increment ECC, EIC, DP,
supply MoTRI, AISCO
Support/establish
youth and
Lead: MoA
women groups # of youth & women
100% Collaborating:
to engage in groups supported / 210
increment ECC, MoWSA,
agricultural established
DP. EABC
input supply and
services
# of small-scale improved
Promote small- Lead: MoA
agriculture machinery
scale improved 100% Collaborating:
promoted (thresher, 60
agricultural increment EIAR, CC,
planter, harvester,
machinery ECC, EABC
processors, chopper, etc.)
Strengthen the Lead: MoA

# of machineries
agricultural Collaborating:
provided through lease NA 2,450
machinery lease EMoR, ECC,
scheme
scheme EABC
Establish/
Lead: MoA
strengthen an
# Stakeholders Platforms
input supply 12 12 Collaborating:
established/strengthened
multi-stakeholder
DP
platform

26
Lead: MoA
Establish/
strengthen one- Collaborating:
# of one-stop shop 50%
stop shop for 300
established/strengthened increment ATI, DP,
agri-inputs &
Producers
service
Associations
Promote the Lead: MoA
private sector in # of private sectors

100% Collaborating:
the provision of engaged in fishery inputs 10
increment
inputs for fish supply DP, Producers
production Associations
Link agricultural Lead: MoA
input suppliers
# of supplier & farmers 100% Collaborating:
with nutrient 39
linked increment
dense crop EIAR, ECC,
producers HLI

27
3.2.2. SO 2: Enhance the resilience of vulnerable communities in
agrarian, agro-pastoral, and pastoral settings
Outcome indicator 1: % of vulnerable HHs improved their resilience
Outcome indicator 2: % of HHs diversified their livelihood options
Enhancing the resilience of vulnerable communities in agrarian, agro-pastoral, and

pastoral settings is vital for ensuring food and nutrition security in Ethiopia. These
communities are vulnerable to various challenges, including climate change, natural
disasters, and limited access to services and infrastructure4. Through implementing
targeted strategies and interventions, their resilience can be strengthened to enable
them better cope with shocks and stresses. These efforts enhance access to nutritious
foods, improving dietary diversity, and ultimately addressing food insecurity and
malnutrition5.
Strengthening the resilience of agricultural production systems requires strategic risk

management, implementing efficient water management, applying soil conservation
measures, making appropriate crop selection and management, adopting agroforestry
systems, and practicing climate-smart agriculture6.
acity building, knowledge-sharing, and integrating indigenous knowledge contribute

to effective risk management7. Fostering social capital and strengthening local
institutions, including farmer cooperatives and community-based organizations, are
essential tools for effective risk management8. Additionally, enhancing early warning
systems, crop and livestock insurance programs, livelihood diversification, and social
protection programs plays a significant role in enhancing community resilience12.
4 FAO 2013 Supporting Communities in Building Resilience through Agro pastoral Field Schools
5 Daniel at. al 2023 Pastoralists’ and agro-pastoralists livelihood resilience to climate change-induced risks in
the Borana zone, south Ethiopia: Using resilience index measurement approach
6 Patle, G. T., Kumar, M., & Khanna, M. (2020). Climate-smart water technologies for sustainable agriculture:
a review. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 11(4), 1455-]
7 World Bank. (2018). Strengthening Agricultural Extension Services: An Overview of World Bank Support.
Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agriculture/brief/strengthening-agricultural-extension-services
8 Esther Carmen et.al 2022 Building Community Resilience in Context of climate change: The Role of Social
Capital

28
Strategic Initiative 1: Strengthen risk management in agricultural
production for vulnerable communities
Output indicator: Number of community members reduced the agricultural risks
Lead/
Core activities Key performance Baseline Target
Collaborating
sectors
Strengthen/ # of food reserve
establish food banks established/ 12 24 Lead: MoA
reserves and strengthened Collaborating:
community fodder # of fodder reserve ILRI, EIAR, HLI,
banks and seed 200 %
banks established/ 6 DP, EDRMC
banks increment
strengthened
Promote # of different types Lead: MoA

production of crops grown 6 10
Collaborating:
diversification ILRI, EIAR, HLI,
# of livestock
4 6 DP
species raised
Promote the # of rangeland
6 6
rangeland restoration
Lead: MoA
restoration practices promoted
Collaborating:
practices
Rangelands ILRI, EIAR, HLI,
restored in NA 2000 DP, EDRMC,
Hectares
Restocking of # of livestock
livestock for the restocked in NA 2.5 Lead: MoA
vulnerable group million Collaborating:
# of HHs benefited EDRMC
NA 1.2
Support the # of HHs benefited

Lead: MoA
provision of in million
100% Collaborating:
animal health and 1.8
increment VDFCA, NVI, ILRI,
veterinary services
DP

29
Enhance the # of HHs benefited 2
rural credit and from crop and NA
insurance system livestock insurance

for resilience in million
Lead: MoA
building # of insurance
Collaborating:
companies 2 10
DP, Insurance
engaged in crop
and financial
and livestock
institutions, NBE,
insurances
CC, MFI, Coops
# of financial
institutions
9 18
engaged in
provision of credit
Conduct nutrition Lead: MoA
education for Collaborating:
# of HHs received NA 2.4 million
vulnerable HLI, EIAR,
nutrition education
communities EDRMC
Promote a # of HHs trained
nutrition- on nutrition-
Lead: MoA
sensitive sensitive social 200 1400
Collaborating:
intervention in safety net
EDRMC,
the productive programs
MoWSA, DP
and social safety # of HHs afford
200 12000
net programs to purchase input

30
Strategic Initiative 2: Build resilience of communities through
climate-smart nutritive sensitive agri-food
systems
Output indicator: Proportion of beneficiaries-built resilience through climate-
smart nutrition sensitive agri-food systems
Lead/
Baseline Target
Core activities Key performance indicators Collaborating
(2023) (2030)
sectors
Strengthen / # small scale irrigation
establish small- schemes developed/
scale irrigation strengthen for food and feed Lead: MoA
Increase
for year-round production 24 Collaborating:
in 100%
nutrition- DP
sensitive food &
forage production
Promoting # of agro-forestry practices
5
agroforestry promoted (Silvo pastoral,
3
practices, Wind break, riparian forest,
GAP, water multipurpose trees and dry-
management land afforestation)
practices, # of water management
improving practices promoted (hand
livestock dug wells, water harvesting, 3
management water spreading weirs, 5 Lead: MoA
practices, & the borehole and river diversion) Collaborating:
use of renewable # of improved livestock EIAR, EFD,
energy sources EEPA, MoWE

management practices 4
promoted (crop-livestock 4
integration, good animal

husbandry, feeding, housing
and health)
# of renewable energy
sources promoted (solar, 1 4
wind, greed and biogas)

31
Promote # of indigenous livestock
improved improved breeds
5 Lead: MoA
productivity promoted (Borena, Afar, 8
Collaborating:
of indigenous Somali Black head, Sheko)
LDI, EIAR, ILRI,
livestock and
HLI, DP
fish species # of fish spp. promoted
3 4
Promote access
to one water Lead: MoA
# of HH accessed water
point at the NA 300,000 Collaborating:
points
household level EIAR, HLI
Promote
water and soil
# of water and soil
conservation Lead: MoA
conservation practices
practices/ 3 5 Collaborating:
promoted
conservation EIAR, HLI, EEA
agriculture
Promote the
conservation of Lead: MoA
# of local livestock breeds Collaborating:
local livestock
conserved 3 5
breeds and crop ILRI, EIAR,
landrace HLI, LDI, DP
Introduce Lead: MoA

varieties # of moisture stress Collaborating:
75 150
resistant to resistance crop varieties EIAR, EAA, ECC,
moisture stress introduced ESE

32
Strategic Initiative 3: Integrate indigenous knowledge with modern
agricultural practices
Output indicator: Proportion of indigenous knowledge Integrated with modern
agricultural practices
Core activities Key performance Lead/
Baseline Target
indicators Collaborating
(2023) (2030)
sectors
Capitalize and # of indigenous
modernize knowledges promoted 4 4
indigenous (milk processing, meat
Lead: MoA
knowledge as a processing indigenous
Collaborating:
means of nutrition- fruit, indigenous food
EIAR, HLI,
sensitive resilience preparation)
EDRMC, DP,
building # of indigenous 4
knowledges integrated 4
with modern knowledge
Promote and utilize # of agroforestry
agro-ecological practices implemented 3 5
Lead: MoA
biodiversity
Collaborating:
as a source
6 10 EIAR, BDI, DP
of sustainable # of indigenous crop
diversified food varieties utilized
Identification and # of best practices
promotion of identified, compiled and
6 18 Lead: MoA
best indigenous disseminated
Collaborating:
knowledge
# of indigenous foods Medias, MoH,
practices in
promoted EHA
nutritious food 6 18
production
Promote and # of indigenous food
Lead: MoA
integrate recipe integrated 24 38
Collaborating:
indigenous food & # of indigenous private
EIAR, HLI,
food recipe food processors NA 180
Medias, EHA
supported

33
Strategic Initiative 4: Strengthen income-generating activities for
livelihood improvement
Output indicator 1: Number of alternative income-generating activities promoted
Output indicator 2: Number of vulnerable beneficiaries improved their livelihood
(million)
Lead/
sectors
Promote job # of vulnerable
Lead: MoA
creation programs beneficiaries
Collaborating:
for vulnerable benefited from job 20%
2.4 MoLS EDRMC,
groups creation programs increment
MoWSA, Urban
in million
municipality, DP
Promote the # vulnerable
production of high- HHs benefited in Lead: MoA

value crops and million 2.1
25% Collaborating:
multi-purpose trees increment EIAR, HLI, MoLS,
to the vulnerable EFD, DP
household
Facilitate improved # of vulnerable
livestock-based HHs benefited in
income generating million Lead: MoA

25 %
activities to the 1.2 Collaborating:
increment
vulnerable at the MoLS, EDRMC
household
Promote on and # of vulnerable

off-farm businesses beneficiaries
for vulnerable engaged in on Lead: MoA
40%
groups and off-farm 1.2 Collaborating:
increment
businesses MoLS, MoWSA
(million)

34
Promote simple # of technologies
and effective promoted
transportation
Lead: MoA
trailers (animal-
2 5 Collaborating:
drawn wheel
EIAR, MoLS, DP
systems and small
power tractors)
Promote NSA # vulnerable

Lead: MoA
in Livelihood HHs benefited in
6000 1.2 Collaborating:
improvement million
EDRMC,
programs for
# of livelihood MoWSA, Urban
the vulnerable
programs Municipality DP,
1 4
community
implemented NSA MoLS
Establish/ # of nursery
strengthen sites established/
Lead: MoA
improved seed strengthened
6 60 Collaborating:
and/ seedling
EIAR, HLI, DP
multiplication
nursery site
Strategic Initiative 5: Improve coping mechanisms for shocks &
climate changes
Output indicator 1: # of coping mechanisms introduced
Output indicator 2: # of beneficiaries supported
Lead/
sectors
Promote # of livestock Lead: MoA
Destocking of destocked 10 % Collaborating:
NA
livestock during increment EDRMC, ILRI,
drought /shocks EIAR

35
Strengthen # of traditional
Lead: MoA
social networking
Collaborating:
cohesiveness strengthened (Busa 15 15
MoWSA, HLI,
and networking Gonofa, Dagu, Zeka
ECC, EDRMC
etc.)
Introduce new # of production

production practices with input 3
practices and supplies introduced 6
Lead: MoA
improve input (multipurpose
Collaborating:
supplies tree, agroforestry,
EIAR, DP
intercropping)
# of beneficiaries
215,258 513,133
benefited
Establish # of agricultural
agricultural market information Lead: MoA
market systems established Collaborating:
information NA 6 EMI, ECX,
systems for EDRMC, ATI,
mitigation and MoTRI
resilience
Strengthen early # early warning
Lead: MoA
warning system information
Collaborating:
for mitigation systems 6 6
EMI, EDRMC,
and resilience strengthened
DP
Capacitate # of HHs trained in

venerable million Lead: MoA
communities Collaborating:
NA 1.8
with knowledge EDRMC, EEA,
and skills to HLI, EIAR, DP
cope shocks

36
3.2.3. SO 3: Enhance post-harvest technology, value-addition,
quality, and Safety management of food and feed
Outcome indicator: % decrease in nutrient dense post-harvest food loss
Agricultural commodities are susceptible to huge postharvest losses starting from
the field to consumption. Postharvest losses are exceptionally high in developing
countries due to inadequate harvesting, handling, processing, and storage techniques
and practices9. In Ethiopia, the extent of postharvest loss in grains is 20-30%, in
horticultural products 30-50%, in milk 30%, and in meat 40%. This has become the
priority of governments agenda as a pathway for addressing food security, food and
feed safety, poverty, and nutrition challenges10. The critical points where significant
losses occur should be addressed with proven technologies, considering the objectives
of the various food system actors.
Value-addition and small-scale agro-processing plays an important role in the food

systems by providing smallholder farmers and pastoralist with opportunities to add
values to their products and create jobs, particular for women and youth. This might
be supported by using rural electrification and renewable energy.
Food safety and quality is crucial in the food value-chain. Most food supply-chain actors
and consumers in Ethiopia have insufficient knowledge, practice, and attitude on food
safety and quality management. Addressing food safety and quality is recognized as
the foundation of reducing public health burden, chronic malnutrition, trade barriers,
and improving economic development. The agricultural markets in Ethiopia are
challenged with poor aggregation and transportation, inadequate infrastructure, high
transaction costs, lack of market information, and lack of feasible partners, among
others11,12. Furthermore, input supply and service required incentives including financial
credit, tax exemption, and startup fund, for value-chain actors involved in postharvest
technology manufacturing, importing, distribution, and marketing13. Therefore, it is
important to enhance post-harvest technology, value-addition, quality, and safety
management of food and feed.

37
Strategic Initiative1: Introduce and strengthen post-harvest
technologies and management practices for
food and feed
Outcome indicator 1: Number of HHs participated in post-harvest management
practices
Lead/
sectors
Introduce # of new technologies
and promote introduced
post-harvest (harvesting, handling,
technologies transportation, storage, NA 385
for nutrient- and packaging) [55/year
dense/bio- * 7 years based the PHL
fortified food strategy] Leading: MoA,
and feed # of new EIAR, TVET
(harvesting, technologies utilized Collaborating:
handling, (harvesting, handling, ARI, HLI/TVET,
transportation, transportation, storage, NA 308 ATI, Ministry of
storage, and and packaging) [80% Industry (MoI),
packaging) of the introduced Ministry of
technology] Trade Regional
# of new technology Integration
users (harvesting, and (MTRI),
handling, 3,456,208 16,480,484 Federal
transportation, storage, Cooperative
and packaging) Commission
Tones of products (FCC), DPs,
harvested, handled, and CSOs
stored, transported,
and packaged using
NA 8,239,876
improved technologies
[Pulse, Oil seeds, and
Vegetables production
from CSA 2022]
38
Support the # of improved post-
development harvest technologies Leading: MoA/
and and practices supported EIAR/HLI-TVET
improvement Collaborating:
of post-harvest NA 100 ARI, HLI/TVET,
technologies ATI, MoI, MTRI,
and practices FCC, DPs,
for food and EIAR, MLS
feed
Provide # of trainings
capacity- conducted (one NA 1000
building and training per woreda)
extension # of trained
services for beneficiaries and key Leading: MoA
application of NA 16,375
actors (DAs, experts, Collaborating:
post-harvest and enterprises) ARI, HLI/TVET,
technology # of post-harvest ATI, MoI, MTRI,
and practices technology FCC, DPs,
NA 3,428,879
beneficiaries EIAR, MLS
# of experiences
sharing conducted (one
NA 1000
experience sharing per
woreda)

39
Scale-up best # of scalable best
practices and practices identified
technologies (harvesting, handling,
for nutrient- transportation, storage,
dense/bio- and packaging) [55 (per NA 385
fortified food year) * 7 (years) based

and feed the PHL strategy]
(harvesting,
handling, # of scaled-up
transportation, technologies
storage, and (harvesting, handling,
packaging) transportation, storage, NA 289
and packaging) [75% Leading: MoA,
of the identified EIAR
technology] Collaborating:
# of users of the ARI, HLI, ATI,
scaled-up technologies DPs, and CSOs
(harvesting, handling, 16,480,484
3,456,208
transportation, storage,
and packaging)
Percent of loss reduced 25 durable

using the scaled-up crops
technologies 40% 12.5%
perishable
crops, 20%
30%
animal 17.5%
source
products

40
Strategic Initiative 2: Introduce and enhance nutrient-dense/bio-
fortified food and feed value-addition and
small-scale processing
Output indicator 1: Number of coops/groups/ individuals/enterprises participated in
nutrient dense/bio-fortified food small-scale processing and
value addition.
Output indicator 2: Number of coops/groups/ individuals/enterprises participated in
feed small-scale processing and value addition

Baseline Target
(2023) (2030)
sectors
# of introduced different
value-addition practices
NA 350
/technologies (50 per
year)
Introduce and # of introduced small- Leading: MoA/
promote value- scale processing Rural Enterprise

NA 35
addition and technologies (5 per Bureau
small-scale year) Collaborating:

# of coops/groups/ ARI, HLI/TVET,
processing
enterprise applied MoI, DPs, EIAR,
technologies for
value-addition practices MLS, Investment
nutrient-dense/ NA 5,070
and/ technologies (5 Commission,
bio-fortified food
groups/ woreda: plus 70 IPDC, EFBPI,
and feed
coops) Private sector/
# of coops/groups/ associations
enterprise applied
small-scale processing NA 5,070
technologies (5 groups/
woreda: plus 70 coops)

41
# of incubation
Support the centers supported
development (391 advanced, 368 NA 1103 Leading: MoA/
of value-added intermediates, and 344 EIAR/HLI-TVET
nutrient-dense pre-basic FTCs)
complementary # of nutrient-dense Collaborating:
and complementary foods NA 70
ARI, HLI/TVET,
supplementary developed (10 per year)
ATI, MoI, FCC,
foods and feed for # of nutrient-dense
DPs, EIAR, MLS
target vulnerable supplementary
NA 14
groups (alternative) foods
developed (2 per year)
# of value-added
products promoted (5 NA 35
per year)
Promote # of underutilized or Leading: MoA
value-added indigenous product NA 7

Collaborating:
underutilized developed (1 per year)
and indigenous # of value-added feed ARI, HLI/TVET,
nutritious food products promoted (5 NA 35 ATI, MoI, FCC,
and feed products per year) DPs, EIAR, MLS
# of underutilized or
indigenous feed product NA 7
developed (1 per year)
# of trained
beneficiaries and
Strengthen actors (coop members, NA 16,375 Leading: MoA
extension services individuals and
on value-addition enterprise) Collaborating:
and small-scale # of farmers received
ARI, HLI/TVET,
processing of extension services on
NA 3,428,879 ATI, MoI, MTRI,
nutrient-dense/ value-addition and
FCC, DPs, EIAR,
bio-fortified food small-scale processing
# of experience MLS
and feed
sharing’s organized (1 NA 1000
per woreda)

42
Strategic Initiative 3: Strengthen nutrient-dense/bio-fortified food
and feed aggregation and market-linkage
Output indicator 1: Number of farmers/cooperatives/groups/enterprises linked to
agro-processing industries
Output indicator 2: Number of aggregate market centers established/strengthened
Baseline Target
(2023) (2030)
sectors
Establish/strengthen # of market linkages
market linkage with the agro-industry Leading: MoA
and promotion of parks (5 per woreda) NA 5000 Collaborating:
nutrient-dense/bio- ARI, HLI/TVET,
fortified value-added ATI, MoI, MTRI,
# of promotions
and processed food FCC, DPs,
conducted (10 per NA 10,000
and feed EIAR, MLS
woreda)
Encourage private # of private sectors

sectors to be involved involved in production Leading: MoA
NA 70
in the production (10 per year) Collaborating:
and promotion of ARI, HLI/TVET,
nutrient-dense/bio- # of private sectors ATI, MoI, MTRI,
fortified value-added involved in promotion (2 FCC, DPs,
food and feed NA 2000
per woreda) EIAR, MLS
Establish/strengthen # of aggregation centers

safe and quality food established /strengthen
NA 1000
and feed product (1 per woreda)
Leading: MoA
aggregation for bulk
Collaborating:
market supply # of pack house /
ARI, HLI/TVET,
warehouse established
NA 35 ATI, MoI, MTRI,
(based of PHL strategy; 5
FCC, DPs,
per year)
EIAR, MLS
# of products granted
quality grading (2 per NA 14
year)

43
Support the # of standard market
establishment/ and sheds constructed NA 35
strengthening (5 per year)
of marketing # of market information Leading: MoA
infrastructure systems established/ Collaborating:
strengthened (based of NA 35 ARI, HLI/TVET,
the PHL strategy; 5 per ATI, MoI, MTRI,
year) FCC, DPs,
# of introduced cold EIAR, MLS
chain facilities ((based of
NA 35
the PHL strategy; 5 per
year)
Strategic Initiative 4: Enhance post-harvest technology input

supply and services for nutrient-dense/bio-
fortified food and feed source
Output indicator 1: Number of service providers engaged in nutrient dense
bio-fortified food
Output indicator 2: Number of service providers engaged in feed
Lead/
sectors
Introduce and # of post-harvest
promote post- input technologies
harvest input introduced (15 per NA 105
technologies year)
(harvesting, Leading: MoA
handling, # of post-harvest input Collaborating:
transportation, technologies promoted ARI, HLI/TVET,
storage, and ATI, MoI, MTRI,
packaging of FCC, DPs, EIAR,

NA 105 MLS
food and feed)

44
Facilitate the use # of incentives
of policy and packages promoted 1 5
Leading: MoA
other incentives # of target Collaborating:
for post-harvest beneficiaries and actors ARI, HLI/TVET,
technology input accessed the incentives ATI, MoI, MTRI,
supply of food (391 advanced, 368 NA 1103
FCC, DPs, EIAR,
and feed intermediates, and 344 MLS
pre-basic FTCs)
Encourage public # of public sectors
and private sensitized/ supported
sectors to be to produce Leading: MoA
NA 14
involved in the technologies (2 per Collaborating:
supply and mass year) ARI, HLI/TVET,
production # of private sectors ATI, MoI, MTRI,
of innovative sensitized/ supported FCC, DPs, EIAR,
post-harvest produce technologies MLS
NA 35
technologies for (5 per year)
food and feed
Provide capacity- # of training session
building for conducted (2 per year) NA 14 Leading: MoA
post-harvest Collaborating:
# suppliers and service
technology input ARI, HLI/TVET,
provider trained (100
applications for NA 700 ATI, MoI, MTRI,
trainees /per year)
suppliers and FCC, DPs, EIAR,
service providers # of experience sharing MLS
NA 7
of food and feed organized (1 per year)

45
Strategic Initiative 5: Strengthen food safety and quality
management of food and feeds
Output indicator 1: Number of food safety and quality management control system
strengthened
Output indicator 2: Number of feed safety and quality management control system
strengthened
Output indicator 3: Proportion of industries, small-scale producers that met national
food quality standards
Output indicator 4: Proportion of industries, small-scale producers that met national
feed quality standards
Lead/
sectors
Enhance food # of developed/
and feed safety strengthened food
and quality safety standards for NA 2
Leading: MoA,
management food and feeds Agri. Research
control system Percent of small- institutes, HLI, ATI
scale processors
implemented good Collaborating:
NA 90%
handling/hygienic
MoI, MoH, EFDA,
practices
EAA, ECAE,
Percentage
Development
compliance with
partners, CSOs
national/international NA 90%
safety standards

46
Strengthen # of advocacy
advocacy, sessions/ workshops
NA 70 Leading: MoA
public conducted (10 per
awareness, and year) Collaborating:
# of communication
communication
platforms established ARI, HLI/TVET,
on food and
(media outlets, ATI, MoI, MTRI,
feed safety
communication NA 70 FCC, DPs, EIAR,
and quality
materials, etc.,) MLS
management
systems
Capacity-building # of qualified food
for food and feed quality and safety
safety and quality experts hired (1 per NA 1000
management woreda)
control systems # of food safety and
quality manuals and
Leading: MoA
standard operating NA 2 Collaborating:
procedures (SOPs)
ARI, HLI/TVET, ATI,
developed
MoI, MTRI, FCC,
# of SBCC materials
NA 2 DPs, EIAR, MLS
developed
# of agricultural/food
safety and quality
experts, development NA 16,375
agents, and business
operators trained

47
3.2.4. SO 4: Enhance the consumption of diversified, nutritious,
safe, and healthy diet
Outcome indicator: Proportion of HHs that met minimum dietary diversity
score
The majorities of communities in Ethiopia primarily grows and consume grain crops,
leading to grain-based food which is monotonous diet14. However, the nutrient
content of grain-based foods is insufficient to meet the nutritional needs of individuals
across all age groups. As a result, households that rely on grains as their main food
source suffer from malnutrition and related illnesses. Factors, such as feeding habits,
cultural influences, food availability/accessibility and affordability, improper cooking
and preparation methods, unhygienic practices, and lack of nutritional knowledge and
skills contribute to these problems15,16. To address these issues, it is essential to promote
the consumption of diverse, nutritious, safe, and healthy diets that align with people’s
preferences. Therefore, it is important to identify various strategic interventions that can
improve food and nutrition knowledge and encourage the consumption of diversified,
nutritious, safe, and healthy diet.
Strategic Initiative 1.Promote the consumption of diversified

healthy diet
Output indicator: % of HHs consumed diversified healthy diet
Key performance Baseline Target Lead/Collaborating
Core activities
indicators (2023) (2030) sectors
Assess the Leading: MoA
diversified healthy # of assessments Collaborating:
diet consumption conducted 1 2 HLI, BOA, NGOs, CSA,
practice MOH
Leading: MoA
Promote the
% of HHs implement Collaborating:
implementation of
the Food-based 10 80 MOH, MOE, HLI,
Food-based dietary
dietary guideline NGOs, CSOs, Research
guideline at HH level
centers

48
Promote the # of events
150 900 Leading: MoA
consumption organized
Collaborating:
of homestead
% of HH consume MOH, Academia,
products in urban,
homestead 10 80 NGOs, CSOs,
peri-urban and
products Research centers
rural areas
Establish diversified
healthy diet
# of established Leading: MoA
and good food
nutrition Collaborating:
hygienic practices 30 555
counseling centers MOH, Academia,
counseling center
at FTCs and NDCs FAO, NGOs, CSOs,
at TVETS, Farmer
field school, FTC
Promote utilization # of underutilized Leading: MoA
of underutilized/ nutrient-dense Collaborating:
7 14
new nutrient- food sources Academia, Research
dense food sources promoted Centers, NGOs,
Standardize
Leading: MoA
cooking
# of standardized Collaborating:
demonstration 1 5
cooking guideline Academia, Research
guideline with local
Centers, NGOs, MOH
context
Capacity building
Leading: MoA
on diversified
# of capacity Collaborating:
healthy diet
building events 150 900 Academia, Research
preparation and
organized Centers, MOH,
consumption at all
NGOs,
levels
Awareness creation Leading: MoA
on diversified % of HH consume Collaborating:
healthy diet diversified healthy 20 80 MOH, Academia,
preparation and diet Research Centers,
consumption NGOs,

49
Leading: MoA
Organize
Collaborating:
diversified healthy # of events
300 1800 Academia, Research
diet consumption organized
Centers, MOH,
promotion events
NGOs,
Promote diversified
healthy diet
consumption Leading: MoA
# of mass medias
through Collaborating:
(TV, Radios) 30 30
national and Broadcast agency
broadcast used
regional medias RBOA
(broadcasts) with
different language

50
Strategic Initiative 2. Establish/strengthen nutrition-demonstration
center for diversified healthy diet
Output indicator: Number of established nutrition demonstration centers
Lead/
sectors
Establish nutrition- # of established 2 15 Leading: MoA
demonstration center nutrition Collaborating:
for diversified healthy demonstration BOA, FAO,
diet centers NGOs, SD, FSRP,
Standardize nutrition # of standardize 1 5 Leading: MoA

demonstration nutrition Collaborating:
guidelines with local demonstration MOH, BOA, FAO,
context centers NGOs, SD, FSRP
guidelines
Standardize diversified # of recipes 1 5 Leading: MoA
and healthy diet standardize Collaborating:
recipes manual with Academia,
local context-base for Research
the demonstration centers, FAO,
centers SCI
Equip the nutrition- # of equipped 2 15 Leading: MoA

demonstration centers demonstration Collaborating:
with the necessary centers MOH, Regional
materials and tools BOA, FAO,
NGOs, SD, FSRP,

51
Strategic Initiative3: Strengthen
Strengthen consumption of diversified healthy
diet on public and private feeding institutions
Output indicator: Number of feeding centers provides a diversified healthy diet
Key
Baseline Target Lead/Collaborating
Core activities performance
(2023) (2030) sectors
indicators
Leading: MoA
Conducting need
Collaborating:
assessment on
Academia, Research
the consumption # of
Centers, NGOs, MOH,
of diversified assessments 1 2
DRM, IOM, OCHA,
healthy diet at conducted
MOE, MOWSA, MODF,
public and private
Private sectors,
feeding institutes
MOTRI, MOI, MOCT,
Leading: MoA
Collaborating:
Academia, Research
Develop context # of recipes
Centers, NGOs, MOH,
base diversified developed
1 4 DRM, IOM, OCHA,
healthy diet with context
MOE, MOWSA, MODF,
recipes base
Private sectors,
MOTRI, MOI, WFP,
UNICEF, MOCT,
Leading: MoA
Collaborating:
Capacity Building # of capacity Academia, Research
on the benefits of building event Centers, NGOs, MOH,
15 30
diversified healthy conducted DRM, IOM, OCHA,
diet consumption MOE, MOWSA, MODF,
Private sectors,
MOTRI, MOI, MOCT,

52
Leading: MoA
Conduct practical Collaborating:
ToT on proper Academia, Research
preparation # of ToT Centers, NGOs, MOH,
10 20
and handling of conducted DRM, IOM, OCHA,
diversified healthy MOE, MOWSA, MODF,
diet Private sectors,
MOTRI, MOI, MOCT,
Leading: MoA
Promote Collaborating:
preservation/ Academia, Research
# of
storage Centers, NGOs, MOH,
technologies 4 8
technologies for a DRM, IOM, OCHA,
promoted
diversified healthy MOE, MOWSA, MODF,
diet Private sectors,
MOTRI, MOI
Leading: MoA
Collaborating:
Promote proper # of Academia, Research
food hygienic promotion Centers, NGOs, MOH,
150 900
practices at events DRM, IOM, OCHA,
feeding institutes organized MOE, MOWSA, MODF,
Private sectors,
MOTRI, MOI, UNICEF

53
Leading: MoA
Creating market Collaborating:
linkage of local MoLS, Academia,
smallholder # of market Research Centers,
farmer and linkage 300 1800 NGOs, MOH, DRM,
producers with created IOM, OCHA, MOE,
the feeding MOWSA, MODF,
centers Private sectors,
MOTRI, MOI, MOCT
Strategic Initiative 4: Promote Market Supply of Diversified Healthy

Diet
Output indicator: # of diversified healthy diet supplier
Key performance Baseline Target Lead/Collaborating
Core activities
indicators (2023) (2030) sectors
Leading: MoA
Collaborating:
Conducting need MOTRI, MOLS,
assessment on Unions, cooperative,
# of assessments
market supply of 1 2 NGOs
conducted
diversified healthy SME, Private sectors.
diet Agro-industry, CSA,
Ethiopian standard
authority, FDA, MOCT
Leading: MoA
Collaborating:
Capacitate
# of suppliers MOTRI, MOLS
diversified healthy 100 600
capacitated Unions, cooperative
diet suppliers
SME, Private sectors.
Agro-industry MOCT

54
Leading: MoA
Conduct a market
Collaborating:
campaign on # of the market
MOTRI, MOLS
diversified healthy campaign 100 600
Unions, cooperatives,
diet supply and conducted
SME, Private sectors,
consumption
Agro-industry MOCT
Create market
Leading: MoA
linkage of
Collaborating:
healthy diet
# of linkages MOTRI, MOLS, Unions,
food producers, 60 110
created cooperatives, SME,
suppliers,
Private sectors, Agro-
processors and
industry MOCT
consumers
Leading: MoA
Capacitate
Collaborating:
producers and
MOTRI, MOLS,
suppliers on the # of trainings
Academia, research
preparation and conducted 10 20
centers, Unions,
processing of
cooperatives, SME,
diversified healthy
Private sectors, Agro-
diets
industry MOCT
Promote
Leading: MoA
preservation/
Collaborating:
storage
# of MOTRI, Academia,
technologies for
technologies 4 8 research centers,
diversified healthy
promoted Unions, cooperatives,
diet producers,
SME, Private sectors,
processors and
Agro-industry MOCT
suppliers

55
Strategic Initiative 5: Promote Appropriate Food Hygienic Practices
Output indicator 1: % of HH practiced appropriate food hygienic practices
Output indicator 2: % of value chain actors applied appropriate food
hygienic practices
Key
(2023) (2030) sectors
indicators
Leading: MoA
Conduct
# of Collaborating:
assessment on
assessments 1 2 MOH, Academia,
food hygienic
conducted research centers, NGOs,
practices
CSA, ESA, FDA, MOTRI
# of trainings
Conduct conducted Leading: MoA
training on for producers, 10 40 Collaborating:
food hygienic processors and MOH, Academia,
practices for suppliers research centers, NGOs,
value chain # of trainings CSA, ESA, FDA, MOTRI,
actor conducted for 30 60 MOCT,
consumers
Leading: MoA
# of trainings Collaborating:
Capacitate
provided for MOH, Academia,
food hygienic 5 20
food hygienic research centers, NGOs,
practitioners
practitioner CSA, ESA, FDA, MOTRI
MOCT,
Leading: MoA
Promote # of Collaborating:
food waste promotion MOH, Academia,
150 900
management events research centers, NGOs,
and treatment organized CSA, ESA, FDA, MOTRI
MOCT,

56
Leading: MoA
# of Collaborating:
promotion MOH, Academia,
60 150
Promote events research centers, NGOs,
food hygienic organized CSA, ESA, FDA, MOTRI,
practices MOCT
through Leading: MoA
different Collaborating:
approaches # of social MOH, Academia,
30 30
media used research centers, NGOs,
CSA, ESA, FDA, MOTRI,
MOCT
Strategic Initiative 6: Strengthen the implementation of Social

behavioral change communication (SBCC)
Output indicator: % of HHs habited the consumption of diversified
nutritious and healthy diet
Key
(2023) (2030) sectors
indicators
Leading: MoA
Conduct
Collaborating:
assessment on # of
MOH, Academia,
diversified healthy assessments 1 2
research centers,
diet consumption conducted
NGOs, UN, Religious
social behavior
institution
Leading: MoA
Collaborating MOH,
Standardize context # of SBCC tools Academia, research
1 5
base SBCC tools standardized centers, NGOs, UN,
Religious institution,
MOCT,

57
Capacitate religious
# of trainings
and community
conducted Leading: MoA
organization
for religious Collaborating:
leaders, elders, and
leaders, Religious institution
influential persons 30 60
elders, and Forum, Local NGOs,
to preach the
community MOCT, Academia,
consumption of
influential research centers
diversified healthy
persons
diets
Leading: MoA
Establish
# of Collaborating:
community
community Religious institution
dialogue platform
dialogue 4 8 Forum, Local NGOs,
on diversified
platform MOH, MOE, MOCT,
healthy diet and
established Academia, research
nutrition
centers
Conduct awareness Leading: MoA
creation and # of awareness Collaborating:
information creation events Religious institution
dissemination conducted Forum, Local NGOs,
150 300
on the benefits MOH, MOE MOCT,
of a diversified, Academia, research
nutritious, and centers
healthy diet for the
% of Leading: MoA
HH with targeting
Households Collaborating:
children, pregnant
access to Religious institution
and lactating
nutrition 20 80 Forum, Local NGOs,
women through
information MOH, MOE MOCT,
different approaches
Academia, research

58
# of established Leading: MoA
Establish nutrition nutrition clubs Collaborating:
150 300
clubs to provide at schools MOE, NGOs
food and nutrition Regional BOE
education in schools % of students Leading: MoA
trained in food Collaborating:
10 50
& nutrition MOE, NGOs
education Regional BOE
Conduct advocacy # of advocacies Leading: MoA
for decision conducted Collaborating:
makers including MoH, Regional BoA,
parliament members MoE, Academia,
to integrate and Religious institution
support the Forum, Federal and
1 7
implementation of regional Government
diversified nutritious
and healthy diet
in their strategy,
policy, and other
documents
Support school # of schools Leading: MoA
gardening participated Collaborating:
in school 30 150 MOE, Wash, MoWE
gardening Community water
committee, MOCT,
Capacitate women # of Leading: MoA
development army capacitated Collaborating:
on diversified health women 150 900 MOWSA, Regional
diet consumption development BOA, MOH, Local
army NGOs
Assigning and # of Leading: MoA
follow up food ambassadors Collaborating:
and nutrition assigned 15 15 MOWSA, Regional
ambassador / BOA, MOH, Local
champion NGOs

59
3.2.5. SO 5: Establish/ strengthen food and nutrition organizational structure
and implementation capacity in the agriculture sector and its
affiliate organizations
Outcome indicator 5: Improved capacity of NS-Agri-food systems implementing
agriculture sector and affiliate institutions

Establishing and strengthening the food and nutrition structure and implementation
capacity in the agriculture sector and its affiliate organizations is fundamental
for addressing food security and promoting better nutrition outcomes in Ethiopia.
However, the existing food and nutrition structure in Ethiopia has several challenges
these includes weak alignment and inconsistent structural arrangements across
regions, irregular compositions and capacity gaps of professionals, limited resource
allocation, and insufficient leadership outlook. These challenges call for establishing
or enhancing institutions responsible for food and nutrition governance, coordination,
and implementation. Conducting organizational capacity (human, financial,
infrastructure) scanning, advocacy, lobbying, and follow-up and support are required
to create a food and nutrition structure and fill it with appropriate experts.
The food and nutrition structure should be robust and encompass key aspects such as
food security, sustainable agriculture, dietary diversity, post-harvest management, food
safety and quality, and other nutrition-sensitive interventions. Therefore, this strategic
objective is developed to establish and strengthen food and nutrition structure and
implementation capacity in the agriculture sector and its affiliate organizations to
improve food and nutrition security.

60
Strategic Initiative 1: Establish/strengthen food and nutrition
organizational structures in the agricultural
sector including affiliated institutions at all
administrative levels
Output indicator: Number of regions and affiliated institutions that established/
strengthened food and nutrition organizational structure
Core activities Key performance Baseline Target Lead/
indicators (2023) (2030) Collaborating
sectors
Leading: MoA
Conduct a base
Collaborating:
line survey of # of baseline
Regional
organizational assessment NA 1
government,
structure and conducted
Civil Service
human resource
Commission, HLI
# of advocacy
forums conducted NA 15 Leading: MoA
Conduct advocacy
Collaborating:
and lobbying to
# of food Regional
create/strengthen
and nutrition government
a food and 5 15
structures created/ and Civil Service
nutrition structure
strengthened Commission
Leading: MoA
Establish/ # of regions
Collaborating:
strengthen food established/
Regional
and nutrition strengthened 4 13
government
structure at all food and nutrition
and Civil Service
levels structure
Commission
Leading: MoA
Support food and
Collaborating:
nutrition structure # of positions filled
Regional
to be filled with with appropriate NA 3,471
government
appropriate experts
and Civil Service
experts at all levels
Commission

61
Establish/ # of affiliate Leading: MoA
strengthen food institutions Collaborating:
and nutrition established/ Regional
2 9
structure strengthened government
at affiliate food and nutrition and Civil Service
institutions structure Commission
Strategic Initiative 2: Capacitate the agriculture sector to implement a

nutrition- sensitive agri-food systems strategy
Output indicator: Number of capacitated agriculture sector to implement NS-
AFSS at all levels
Core activities Key Baseline Target Lead/
performance (2023) (2030) Collaborating
indicators sectors
Develop
One
implementation
# of manual,
manual, guidelines Leading: MoA
documents one
and brochure, NA Collaborating:
produced (two guideline,
for the nutrition- BoA, EIAR, HLI
in each year) and 1000
sensitive agri-food
brochures
systems strategy
Conduct baseline
# of baseline Leading: MoA
survey for agri-food
survey NA One Collaborating:
systems training
conducted BoA, EIAR, HLI
need
Conduct needs- # of trainings
based training on conducted (at Leading: MoA
nutrition-sensitive federal and at NA 15 Collaborating:
agri-food systems 14 regions) BoA, EIAR, HLI
strategy at all levels

62
Strategic Initiative 3: Support/facilitate to revise and incorporate
nutrition-sensitive agri-food systems in the
primary & high schools, and higher learning
institution curricula
Output indicator: Number of NNS-Agri-food contents incorporated in
the national curriculum
Lead/
sectors
# of gap assessment
Leading: MoA
Conduct gap conducted (one
Collaborating:
assessment on the at schools, one at NA 3
BoA, MoE, BoE,
existing curricula ATVET, and one at
HLI
universities)
# of curricula Leading: MoA
Develop/revise the
developed and Collaborating:
existing curricula based 1 5
revised BoA, MoE, BoE,
on the identified gaps
HLI, MoLS
Advocate/lobby the
Leading: MoA
education sector to # of advocacy/
Collaborating:
incorporate agri- lobbying forums NA 6
BoA, MoE, BoE,
food systems into the conducted
HLI
curricula
Build capacity of # of teachers/ Leading: MoA

teachers/lecturers, and lecturers, and Collaborating:
NA 200
researchers on the researchers took BoA, MoE, BoE,
developed curricula training HLI
Leading: MoA
Provide technical
support to school
# school supported 50 240 Collaborating:
gardening, and
BoA, MoE, BoE,
nutrition clubs
HLI

63
Support research
# of universities
institutions and Leading: MoA
and research
universities to conduct Collaborating:
centers conducted 15 35
operational research on BoA, MoE, BoE,
operational research
nutrition-sensitive agri- HLI
on NS-AFS
food systems
Strategic Initiative 4: Leverage nutrition sensitive agri-food systems

interventions into existing and emerging
agriculture policy, strategies, programs and
projects
Output indicator 1: Number of sub-sectors and affiliated institutions of
MoA that mainstreamed and implemented food and
nutrition policy and strategy into their strategies,
programs, and plans
Key Lead/
Baseline Target
Core activities performance Collaborating
(2023) (2030)
indicators sectors
Leading: MoA
Review and update
Collaborating:
agricultural policy,
# of updated EIAR, ATI, EAA,
strategies, program and 7 14
documents ECC, ECTA, ADI,
project documents to
EFD, EBDI, EAEIA,
incorporate NS-AFS
EWLA, LDI,
Conduct advocacy and # of advocacy
Leading: MoA
sensitization on revised or sensitization
1 15 Collaborating:
policy and strategies at conducted
EIAR and ATI
all levels
Enhance the
Organize
implementation
exposure Leading: MoA
capacity of decision-
visit on 3 4 Collaborating:
makers in the
implantation ATI
agricultural sector on
of NS-AFS
NS-AFS

64
Strategic
Strate gic Initiative 5: Ensure intra- and inter nutrition-sensitive
agri-food systems coordination at all levels
Output indicator: Number of functional coordination platforms
established
Key Lead/
Baseline Target
Core activities performance Collaborating
(2023) (2030)
indicators sectors
Strengthen # of coordination
Leading: MoA
coordination of NS-AFS forums
Collaborating:
within the agriculture conducted (every
EIAR, ATI, EAA,
sectors (PSNP V, FSRP, quarter) NA 28
ECC, ECTA, EFD,
drought resilience
EBDI, EAEIA,
sustainable livelihood
EWLA, LDI,
program, etc.)
Strengthen a NS-AFS # of coordination
forum/task force to forums
strengthen linkages conducted (once Leading: MoA
with donors, UN every year) Collaborating:
NA 7
agencies, NGOs, FNS Signatories,
academia, ATVETC, RE&DFS
researchers, and private
sectors
Chair the national # of review
and regional Food meetings
System and Nutrition conducted Leading: MoA
Steering and Technical NA 42 Collaborating:
Committees when the FN Signatories
issue is about Food
System
Strengthen institutional # of consultation
linkages between forum conducted Leading: MoA
agriculture and other NA 7 Collaborating:
sectors at all levels. FN Signatories

65
Strengthen the # of PPP Leading: MoA
linkage among agri- forums Collaborating:
food systems value conducted NA 7 EIAR, ATI, ECC,
chain actors Academia,
private, DP
3.2.6. SO 6: Ensure empowerment and engagement of women,

youth and vulnerable groups in the nutrition sensitive
agri-food systems
systems
Outcome indicator 6.1: proportion of women empowered in agriculture
Promoting women’s empowerment and youth engagement in the nutrition-sensitive

agri-food systems is essential for achieving sustainable development, reducing poverty,
and improving food security and nutrition outcomes. The government has taken steps
to promote gender equality and women’s empowerment in the agriculture sector
through various policies and programs and demonstrated its commitment by accepting
major international and regional initiatives. However, the involvement of women and
youth in access and control over resources, technology use, and decision-making roles
are still limited.
The strategic objective aims to ensure employment opportunities for women, youth,
and peoples with special need in the agricultural sector, enhance their skills and
entrepreneurship, improve access to productive resources, enhance their decision-
making roles, and promote their active participation in transforming the nutrition-
sensitive agri-food systems.

66
Strategic Initiative 1: Ensure women’s access to productive
resources in the nutrition-sensitive agri-
food systems
Output indictor: Percent of women accessed productive resources
Lead/
sectors
Improve # of women supplied Leading: MoA
women’s access with agricultural Collaborating:
NA 3,400,000
to agricultural inputs BoA, MoWSA,
inputs BoWSA
Improve # of women Leading: MoA
women’s access benefited from agri- Collaborating:
to agriculture extension services BoA, MoWSA,
NA 3,400,000
extension BoWSA
services
Improve # of women accessed Leading: MoA

women’s access credit and finance Collaborating:
to credit and services NA 3,400,000 BoA, MoWSA,
financial services BoWSA, Banks,
MFI
# of women supported
Support/promote NA 3,400,000 Leading: MoA
by IGAs
income-generating Collaborating:
activities (IGAs) BoA, MoWSA,
# of women accessed
and facilitate NA 3,400,000 BoWSA, MoTRI,
market opportunities
market access BoTRI
Leading: MoA
Promote labor Collaborating:
# of technologies Based on
and time-saving NA BoA, MoWSA,
promoted findings
technologies BoWSA, MoWE,
BoWE

67
Leading: MoA
Collaborating:
BoA, MoWSA,
Create access
BoWSA,
to labor and # of women
MoWE, BoWE,
time-saving benefited from NA 3,400,000
Technology
technologies for technologies
and innovation
women
institutes, EIAR/
RARIs, HLIs,
privet sectors
Strategic Initiative 2: Improve women’s decision-making power at

household and community level
Output indicator: Percent of women empowered in decision making at
household and community level
Lead/
Key performance Baseline
Core activities Target (2030) Collaborating
indicators (2023)
sectors
Create # awareness
awareness of creation forums
women on conducted (40%
Leading: MoA
access and of 3,400,000
Collaborating:
control of women headed NA 1,360,000
BoA, MoWSA,
household and HHs participated
BoWSA
community in agricultural
assets production)
Create Proportion
awareness for of women in
women on leadership positions
leadership and in farmers’ groups
decision-making (40% of 3,400,000 NA 1,360,000
roles women headed
HHs participated
in agricultural
production)
68
Increase Proportion Leading: MoA
women’s of women’s Collaborating:
NA 3,400,000
membership and membership in BoA, MoWSA,
leadership in farmers’ groups BoWSA
farmers’ groups
Proportion of
(cooperatives,
women’s leadership
rural enterprises,
in farmers’ groups
Irrigation water NA 28500
users’ association
(IWUA), etc.)
Organize # women benefited Leading: MoA
women’s credit from credit and Collaborating:
and saving saving (40% of NA 1,360,000 BoA, MoWSA,
groups 3400000 women BoWSA, Banks,
headed HHs) MFI
Promote women # of women Leading: MoA
involvement in involved in value Collaborating:
value addition addition and small- BoA, MoWSA,
and small-scale scale processing BoWSA, Banks,
processing of (40% of 3400000 MFI
NA 1,360,000
agricultural women headed
commodities HHs participated
in agricultural
production)
Brand and # of products Leading: MoA
promote branded and Collaborating:
income- promoted BoA, MoWSA,
generating BoWSA, MoTRI,
Based on
nutrient-dense BoTRI
NA identified
food products to
brands
attract markets
and increase
income

69
Promote male # of recognized NA 6,800,000 Leading: MoA
involvement model husbands Collaborating:
in productive, (50% of 13,600,000 BoA, MoWSA,
reproductive, and males headed HHs) BoWSA, MoH
caring practices
Awareness # of awareness NA 1,360,000 Leading: MoA
creation creation training Collaborating:
for women conducted for BoA, MoWSA,
headed HHs women headed BoWSA
on nutrition- HHs (40% of
sensitive 340000 participated
agricultural in agricultural
production and production)
consumption
Develop and # SBCC documents NA 20 Leading: MoA
disseminate produced and Collaborating:
SBCC materials disseminated BoA, MoWSA,
and tools to BoWSA, MoH
address socio-
cultural barriers
Strategic Initiative 3: Improve youth engagement and enhance

their role in the nutrition-sensitive agri-food
systems
Output indicator: Number of youths benefited from nutrition-sensitive
agri-food systems interventions
Lead/
sectors
Improve youth’s # youth accessed to Leading: MoA
access to agricultural inputs Collaborating:
agricultural inputs (10% of 40 million NA 4,000,000 BoA, MoLS, BoLS
youths)

70
Improve # Youth accessed Leading: MoA
youth’s access to agri-extension Collaborating:
to agriculture services (10% of 40 NA 4,000,000 BoA, MoLS, BoLS
extension services million youths)

Facilitate credit # of youths accessed Leading: MoA
linkages with to credit and finance Collaborating:
microfinance services (10% of 40 NA 4,000,000 BoA, MoLS,
institutions million youths) BoLS, Banks, MFI
Organize youth # of youth groups Leading: MoA

groups and linked (10% of 40 Collaborating:
create linkage to million youths) BoA, MoLS,
NA 400,000
agro-processing BoLS, Banks, MFI
technologies
Support Leading: MoA

# of youths
youth groups’ Collaborating:
benefited from
engagement NA 4,000,000 BoA, MoLS,
IGAs (10% of 40
in IGAs from BoLS, Banks,
million youths)
agriculture. MFI
Awareness
creation on # of youths
Leading: MoA
nutrition- benefited from
Collaborating:
sensitive awareness creation NA 4,000,000
BoA, MoLS,
production & forums (10% of 40
BoLS,
consumption for million youths)
youth

71
Strategic Initiative 4: Ensure vulnerable groups’ access to productive
resources and improve their nutritional status
Output indicator: Number of vulnerable groups benefited from the nutrition-sensitive
agri-food systems
Lead/
Key Performance Baseline Target
Indicator (2023) (2030)
sectors
# of elderlies, people
Improve
with disability and
elderly,
other vulnerable
disabled Leading: MoA
groups accessed to
and other Collaborating:
agricultural inputs NA 4,000,000
vulnerable BoA, MoWSA,
(elderly 3,500,000,
groups access BoWSA
disabled 17,000,000 and
to agricultural
vulnerable=20,500,000).
inputs
Out of this 20%.
Improve
elderly, people
with disability # of elderlies, people
Leading: MoA
and other with disability and
Collaborating:
vulnerable other vulnerable groups NA 70,000
BoA, MoWSA,
groups access benefited from agri-
BoWSA
to agriculture extension services
extension
services
# of elderlies, people
Improve
with disability and
elderly, people
other vulnerable
with disability Leading: MoA
groups accessed credit
and finance services
vulnerable NA 4,100,000 BoA, MoWSA,
(elderly 3500000,
groups access BoWSA, Banks,
disabled 17,000,000 and
to credit and MFI
vulnerable=20,500,000).
other financial
Out of this 20% will be
services
benefited.

72
Facilitate # of people with
access to disability benefited from
Leading: MoA
productive productive resources,
Collaborating:
resources, technologies and the
NA 3,400,000 BoA, MoWSA,
technologies, systems established
BoWSA, Banks,
and systems (Disabled=17,000,000)
MFI
for people with 20% of 17 million
disability peoples with disability)
Support
elderly, people
with disability Leading: MoA
# elderly, people with
disability and other
vulnerable NA 3,400,000 BoA, MoWSA,
vulnerable groups
groups BoWSA,
benefited from IGA
engagement MoWE, BoWE
in IGA from
agriculture.

73
Chapter 4. Implementation arrangement
4.1. Key implementing actors and their role
This strategy will be endorsed at the national level and serve as a roadmap for National Nutrition
Sensitive Agri-Food Systems strategy interventions to be carried out between 2024 and 2030. The
roles and responsibilities of key stakeholders to be engaged in the implementation of this strategy
have been clustered based on their role outlined below.
Ministry of Agriculture (MoA): plays a critical role in the successful implementation of

the Agri-Food Systems Strategy, requiring active involvement and coordination among
multiple sectors and stakeholders. The MoA assumes the pivotal role of the lead sector
and undertakes various responsibilities to ensure the effective execution of the strategy.
 Resource mobilization and management: The ministry is responsible for
mobilizing resources, managing budgets, formulating expenditure plans,
overseeing procurement processes, and conducting monitoring and evaluation
activities. This responsibility includes project development and fundraising
raising.
 Collaboration and coordination: The ministry engage in collaborations and
coordination with key stakeholders (private sectors, CSOs, and community-
based organizations). By fostering these partnerships, the ministry aims
to enhance synergies and promote collective efforts towards strategy
implementation.
 Oversight and guidance: The ministry engage in monitoring progress, ensuring
adherence to established guidelines and frameworks, and identify areas that
require improvement.
 Planning and resource deployment: The ministry develops detailed
implementation plans and strategically deploys resources to support the
achievement of the strategy’s goals.
 Legal framework: The ministry supports and promotes legal frameworks,
guidelines, directives, and other legal instruments relevant to the
implementation of the strategy.

74
In general, by fulfilling these responsibilities, the ministry aims to drive transformative
change and achieve the strategic objectives outlined in the Nutrition-Sensitive Agri-
Food Systems Strategy.
Regional Bureaus of Agricultural (BoA): will facilitate coordination among key
stakeholders in collaboration with the ministry. Additionally, the bureaus will oversee
the implementation of strategy activities at all levels through assigned experts in food
and nutrition and other relevant departments.
Agricultural Research Institutes or Centers: will play a crucial role in the implementation
of the strategy by generating, introducing, adapting, and adopting nutrition-sensitive
technologies and practices. They will promote agri-food systems technologies
using various approaches, engage in capacity-building programs, provide technical
backstopping support and guidance to facilitate the successful implementation of the
strategy.
Higher Learning Institutions: involve in the promotion and implementation of

the strategy through generating knowledge, facilitating innovation, and providing
community services at various scales. The higher institutes offer both short- and long-
term training programs, including specialized and tailor-made programs to address
the challenges and opportunities within nutrition-sensitive agri-food systems.
Multi-sectoral Government Ministries: the implementation of the strategy requires the

active involvement of multiple government ministries. These ministries participate
in service delivery, recognizing the importance of efficient transport and logistics
systems, ensuring the availability of skilled labor, promoting health and nutrition
interventions, supporting industrial development, facilitating trade and regional
integration, empowering women and promoting social inclusion, and addressing
water and energy needs, among others. Their participation ensures that the strategy
is effectively integrated into various sectors, policies, and programs, maximizing its
impact and fostering sustainable development.
Development Partners (NGO, UN): play a vital role in the promotion and implementation
of the strategy in collaboration with the MoA. These partners provide technical and
financial support to ensure the effective execution of the strategy.

75
Private Sectors: engage in technology innovation and adoption, investment,
infrastructure development, value-chain development, and market-oriented
approaches to impalement and promote the strategy. In addition, they promote
environmentally friendly farming practices, fair trade, ensuring food safety standards,
and supporting social responsibility efforts. Collaboration between the public and
private sectors is essential to harness their potential.
Financial Institutes and Insurance: are instrumental in implementing the strategy.

They provide access to finance through credit facilities, investment schemes tailored
to the needs of agriculture, and risk management associated with climate hazards,
financial vulnerability, price volatility, and uncertainties. Financial institutions also
drive innovation and digital solutions in agriculture by adopting technologies, such
as mobile banking, digital payment systems, mobile-based lending platforms, through
capacity-building programs and financial literacy.
4.2. Assumptions and Risks

Effective implementation of the Nutrition-Sensitive Agri-Food systems strategy requires
strong commitments from collaborating sectors and all stakeholders. As a result, the
strategy’s implementation process will involve close monitoring and addressing various
assumptions and risks. Key factors influencing the implementation of the agri-food
systems strategy are as follows:
• Political/government commitment and ownership: It is crucial to ensure

government ownership and commitment to implement the NS agri-food
systems strategy effectively. It is important to continuously review, streamline,
advocate, and strengthen the awareness, communication, and consultative
processes among collaborating actors and stakeholders.
• Insecurity Challenges: Agricultural inputs and products’ production, distribution,

and marketing are significantly impacted by insecurity fueled by political
instability and conflicts. These cause disruptions in supply chains and impede
agricultural productivity as a whole.
• Climate Change: The agricultural systems can be significantly influenced by the

unpredictability linked to climate patterns and the enduring consequences of
climate change. Crop growth can be disrupted, pest and disease dynamics can

76
be altered, and agricultural productivity can be impacted by extreme weather
events driven by climate change. On the other hand, agriculture, particularly
livestock, is the major contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It
generates 19–29% of total GHG emissions (WB, 2021). This calls for designing
and implementing proper strategy and mitigation measures, such as the Climate
Resilience Green Economy strategy and Green Legacy.
• Technology and Input Supply: The efficiency and productivity of agricultural

practices can be hindered by using outdated technologies. Moreover,
insufficient access to high-quality agricultural inputs, improved seeds, animal
feeds, fertilizers, agro-chemicals, veterinary drugs and modern machinery can
restrict the potential for achieving optimal yields and implementing sustainable
agricultural practices.
• Undeveloped Marketing Systems: Traditional marketing systems, characterized

by limited market access, inadequate infrastructure, and information gaps,
can impede the efficient movement of agricultural products from farmers to
consumers. These systems often lack transparency and fail to provide fair prices
to farmers, hindering their economic viability, and less access to consumers.
• Inadequate Infrastructure: Limited investment in agricultural infrastructure,

including transportation networks, storage facilities, and irrigation systems,
can constrain the agri-food system’s performance. Inadequate infrastructure
hampers the timely movement of agricultural inputs and products, leading to
post-harvest losses, reduced market access, and increased transaction costs,
affecting farmers and consumers.
• Capacity Limitations in Implementation: Effective implementation of NS

agri-food systems strategies depends on technical expertise, institutional
capacity, and stakeholder coordination. However, capacity constraints within
governmental organizations, research institutions, and farmer associations
can impede the execution of strategies, such as policy formulation, resource
allocation, and monitoring and evaluation processes.
• Insufficient funding: Insufficient funding can hinder the development and

execution of comprehensive programs to improve food security, enhance
nutrition, and promote sustainable agricultural practices. It impedes the

77
adoption of innovative technologies and practices that can increase agricultural
productivity, improve post-harvest handling and processing, and enhance value
chains. Limited financial investment can hamper efforts to address systemic
issues, such as food waste and loss, inadequate storage and transportation
facilities, and gaps in market information systems. These require financial
resources to develop and maintain infrastructure, establish efficient supply
chains, and implement effective market information systems that connect
farmers with consumers and reduce inefficiencies in the food system.
4.3 Monitoring, evaluation, and learning Framework
The monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) framework describe the strategic
objectives, initiatives, and indicators of the Nutrition-Sensitive Agri-food systems
strategy of 2024-2030. The objectives of the M&E framework are to provide feedback
on the progress toward achieving the strategy and inform decision-makers to allocate
resources accordingly. The Ministry of Agriculture, as the lead implementing sector,
strengthens the M&E system and coordinates all the relevant collaborating sectors,
including CSOs, to ensure effective and efficient implementation of the strategy.
The Ministry of Agriculture will develop an annual operation plan to monitor the
progress toward achieving the strategy. The strategy will be monitored through a
review of administrative data and reports and joint review meetings with collaborating
sectors. The Food and Nutrition office will follow up on the progress toward achieving
the Nutrition-Sensitive Agri-Food system strategy.
The already established Agricultural Management Information System (AGMIS), in the

ministry of agriculture and other web based and administrative data reporting systems
will be used to capture, compile, and analyze nutrition-sensitive agri-food systems
data. Monitoring performances using a scorecard will be part of the data management
system. This will help facilitate the data visualization and review of the annual and
biannual plan performances.
The strategy will be evaluated by mid-term during the three and half years of the
implementation and end-line evaluation after the completion of the plan. The evaluation
process will assess and document progress toward outcomes and impact associated
with strategic objectives. It also examines effectiveness, efficiencies, relevancy, impact
lessons learned, and best practices.

78
Results Framework
Results Indicators Targets MOV Responsible Collaborators
Framework Body
2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Code Baseline
Strategic Objective (SO) 1: Ensure the availability and accessibility of diverse, safe, and nutritious food
Outcome indicator
1: # of households
who have access
SO1 1.6 4.9 8.2 11.5 14.8 18.1 21.4 24.7 Survey
to diverse, safe, and MOA, Research EIAR, EFD, EEA, BDI,
nutritious food (in institutes MoWE
million)
Strategic Initiative 1: Enhance production and productivity of nutrient-rich food crops
Output indicator 1.1:
Volume of increment
of nutrient-rich food 2.4 2.52 2.65 2.78 2.92 3.07 3.22 3.24
crop production (million EIAR, EFD, EEA, BDI,
tons) MoWE
MoA
Output indicator 1.2፡

# of beneficiaries
improved their nutrient- 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.1 3.6 MoA EIAR, EAA, HLI, DP
SI1 dense crop production
(in million)
Strategic Initiative 2: Enhance livestock and fishery production and productivity

Yield increment of HLI, LDI, ILRI, EIAR,
9.3 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.9 10 10.1 10.2
animal products in EAFIA, DP
million tons
MoA

Yield increment of HLI, LDI, ILRI, EIAR,
SI2 125 127.6 128.8 130.1 132.6 133.8 136.3 137.6
feed/forage in million Administrative EAFIA, DP
tons MoA
data
Strategic Initiative 3: Enhance Agro-ecology-based sustainable and climate-smart agriculture

Percent increment in
29.2 33.5 38.5 44.3 50.9 58.5 67.3 77.4
agroecology-based crop
cultivation MoA EIAR, ECC, HLI, DP

Proportion of climate-smart Administrative
29.2 33.5 38.5 44.3 50.9 58.5 67.3 77.4 MoA EIAR, ECC, HLI, DP
agricultural practices data
SI3 introduced
Strategic Initiative 4: Encourage nutrient-dense commercial farming
SI4 Output indicator 4.1:
Proportion of nutrient-
dense crops and forage 4.3 4.5 4.7 4.9 5.1 5.4 5.7 6 EIAR, ECC, HLI, DP
production from
commercial farming
MoA
Strategic Initiative 5: Promote urban, peri-urban, and homestead agriculture production
Output indicator፡
Proportion of HH engaged
in urban, Peri-urban & Administrative
SI-5 14.3 14.9 15.3 15.9 16.5 17.2 17.9 18.6 HLI, ILRI, EIAR,
homestead agriculture data
EAFIA, DP, City
practices Administration
MoA
Strategic Initiative 6: Promote the production of nutritious, underutilized indigenous foods
Output indicator፡ 6.1 Yield
increment of under-utilized
SI-6 and nutritious indigenous
foods in million tons
Administrative MoA
1.5 1.8 2.2 2.6 3.1 3.7 4.4 5.3
report
Strategic Initiative 7: Strengthen research & extensions to ensure the accessibility of technologies and practices for healthy and nutritious foods
Output indicator 7.1፡ MoA EIAR, EIC, ECC,
Administrative
# of research institutes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HLI,
data
capacitated
Output indicator 7.2: # EIAR, EIC, ECC,
of research outputs & HLI,
innovation technologies Administrative MoA
introduced 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
data
SI-7

80
Strategic Initiative 8: Strengthen agricultural inputs and services for nutrition-sensitive agriculture
Output indicator 8.1: EIAR, EAA, HLI,
Administrative
Proportion of increment 10 14 16.2 18.6 21.4 24.6 28.3 32.5 ECC, EABC
data
SI-8 in input supplied MoA
Output indicator 8.2: EIAR, EAA, HLI,
Administrative
% increment of input 8 9.1 10.4 11.9 13.6 15.5 17.7 20.2 ECC, EABC
data
beneficiaries’ MoA
Strategic Objective (SO) 2: Enhance the resilience of vulnerable communities in agrarian, agro-pastoral, and pastoral settings
Outcome indicator MoA, HLI, EIAR, EDRMC
1: % of HHs Research
SO-2 improved their institutes
4.5 5 6 10 12 13 14 15 Survey
resilience /Reduced
Coping Strategy
Index (rCSI) score
Outcome indicator MoA, ILRI, EIAR, HLI, DP,
2: % of HHs Research EDRMC,
17 17.5 18 18.5 19 19.5 20 21 Survey
diversify their institutes
livelihood options
Strategic Initiative 1: Strengthen risk management in agricultural production for vulnerable communities
Output MoA, ILRI, EIAR, HLI,
indicator 1.1: # Research DP, EDRMC,
SI-1 of community institutes
1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.1 3.5 4 4.6 Survey
members reduced
the agricultural
risks
Strategic Initiative 2: Build resilience of communities through climate-smart nutritive sensitive agri-food systems
Output indicator MoA, EIAR, HLI
2.1: Proportion of Research
SI-2 beneficiaries-built institutes
resilience through 1.7 2 2.3 2.6 3 3.4 3.9 4.5 Survey
climate-smart
nutrition sensitive
agri-food systems
Strategic Initiative 3: Integrate indigenous knowledge with modern agricultural practices

81
Output indicator MoA, EIAR, HLI,
3.1: Proportion Research EDRMC, DP,
SI-3 of indigenous institutes
knowledge 3 3.5 4 4.6 5.2 5.8 6.3 7 Survey
integrated with
modern agricultural
practices
Strategic Initiative 4: Strengthen income-generating activities for livelihood improvement

SI-4 Output indicator MoA MoLS, EDRMC,
4.1: # of alternative MoWSA, Urban
2 1 1 1 1 1 Admin data
income-generating municipality, DP
activities promoted
Output indicator MoA,
4.2: # of vulnerable Research
beneficiaries 2.1 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.7 4.3 4.9 5.6 Admin data institutes
improved their
livelihood (million) MoLS, EDRMC
Strategic Initiative 5: Improve coping mechanisms for shocks & climate changes
Output indicator MoA EDRMC, ILRI,
5.1: # of coping EIAR, NVI, DP,
mechanisms 18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Admin report LDI, EAA
introduced
SI-5
Output indicator MoA EDRMC, ILRI,
5.2: # of EIAR, NVI, DP,
215,258 69,028 72,458 73,201 73,696 74,254 74,953 75,453 Admin report
beneficiaries LDI, EAA
supported
Strategic Objective (SO) 3: Enhance post-harvest technology, value-addition, quality, and safety management of food and feed

82
Outcome indicator 3.1: %
decrease in nutrient-dense
post-harvest food loss Agri. Agri.
Research Authority,
SO-3 • Durable institutes, Development
crops HLI, ATI partners,
25 25 23 21 19 17 15 12.5 Survey and CSOs
• Perishables
admin reports
40 40 38 35 32 28 24 20.0
• Animal
source
products 35 35 33 30 27 23 20 17.5
Outcome Survey and Agri. Agri.

indicator 3.2: % admin reports Research Authority,
decrease in feed 50 50 47 43 38 33 28 25 institutes, Development
loss HLI, ATI partners,
CSOs
Strategic Initiative 3.1: Introduce and strengthen post-harvest technologies and management practices for food and feed
Output indicator
3,456,208 4,320,260 5,400,325 6,750,406 8,438,008 10,547,510 13,184,387 16,480,484
3.1: # of HHs MoA, Agri.
participated in Research
SI-1 Admin report
post-harvest institutes,
management HLI, ATI
practices

83
Strategic Initiative 3.2: Introduce and enhance nutrient-dense/bio-fortified food and feed value-addition and small-scale processing
Output indicator MoA, Agri.
3.2.1: # of Research
cooperatives institutes,
/groups/ HLI, ATI
individuals/
enterprises
NA 1000 2000 2500 2500 1000 500 500 Admin report
participated in
nutrient-dense/
bio-fortified
food small-scale
processing and
value addition
SI2
Output indicator
3.2.2: # of
cooperatives/
groups/
individuals/ MoA, Agri.
enterprises Research
NA 500 1000 1250 1250 500 250 250 Admin report
participated in institutes,
nutrient-dense/ HLI, ATI
bio-fortified small-
scale processing
and value addition
of feed
Strategic Initiative 3.3: Strengthen nutrient-dense/bio-fortified food and feed aggregation and market-linkage
Output indicator MoA, Agri.
3.3.1: # of farmers/ Research
SI-3 coops/ groups 500 1000 1250 1250 500 250 250 institutes,
enterprise linked NA Admin report HLI, ATI
to Agro-processing
industries
Output 100 200 250 250 100 50 50 MoA, Agri.

indicator 3.3.2: Research
# of aggregate institutes,
NA Admin report
market centers HLI, ATI
established/
strengthened

84
Strategic Initiative 3.4: Enhance post-harvest technology input supply and services for nutrient-dense/bio-fortified food and feed source
Output indicator Admin report MoA, Agri. MoI, MoH, EFDA,
3.5.1: # of food Research Agri. Authority,
safety and quality 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 institutes, HLI, ECAE, CSOs
management control ATI
system strengthened
Output indicator Admin reports MoA MoI, MoH, EFDA,
3.5.2: # of feed Agri. Authority,
safety and quality ECAE, CSOs, ATI,
management control 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Agri. Research
system strengthened institutes, HLI
Output indicator Survey and MoA Agri. Research

SI-5 3.5.3: % of industries, 10,000 500 800 1000 1200 1500 2000 500 admin reports institutes, HLI,
small-scale producers ATI
that met national
food quality standards
Output indicator Survey and MoA Agri. Research
3.5.4: % of industries, 5,000 250 400 500 600 750 1000 250 admin reports institutes, HLI,
small-scale producers ATI
that met national feed
quality standards

85
Strategic Initiative 3.5: Strengthen food safety and quality management of food and feeds
Output indicator 3.5.1: # Admin MoA, MoI, MoH,
of food safety and quality report Agri. EFDA, Agri.
management control system 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Research Authority,
strengthened institutes, ECAE, CSOs
HLI, ATI
Output indicator 3.5.2: # Admin MoA MoI, MoH,
of feed safety and quality reports EFDA, Agri.
management control system Authority,
strengthened ECAE, CSOs,
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
ATI, Agri.
Research
institutes,
HLI
Output indicator 3.5.3: % 10,000 500 800 1000 1200 1500 2000 500 Survey MoA Agri.
of industries, small-scale and Research
SI-5 producers that met national admin institutes,
food quality standards reports HLI, ATI
Output indicator 3.5.4: % 5,000 250 400 500 600 750 1000 250 Survey MoA Agri.
of industries, small-scale and Research
producers that met national admin institutes,
feed quality standards reports HLI, ATI
Strategic Objective (SO) 4: Enhance the consumption of diversified, nutritious, safe, and healthy diet
Outcome indicator 4: Survey MoA
Proportion of HHs that met report
8 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
SO-4 minimum dietary diversity
score
Strategic Initiative 4.1: Promote the consumption of a diversified healthy diet
Output indicator 4.1: % of 8 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Survey MoA MOH, MOE,
Households fulfill minimum report Academia,
SI-1 diversified diet score NGOs, CSOs,
MOCT,

86
Strategic Initiative 4.2: Establish nutrition demonstration centers for diversified healthy diet
Output indicator 4.2: # of established Regional BOA,
nutrition demonstration centers NA 2 3 3 3 4 Survey report MOA, FAO, NGOs, SD,
SI-1 FSRP
Strategic Initiative 4.3: Strengthen consumption of diversified healthy diet at public and private feeding institutions
Output indicator 4.3: # of feeding
SI-2 centers provide a diversified healthy 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 40 Survey report MOA,
diet (minimum diversified diet score)
Strategic Initiative 4.4: Promote Market Supply of Diversified Healthy Diet
Output indicator 4.4: # of diversified MOTRI, Unions,
healthy diet supplier engaged cooperatives,
SI-3 NGOs, SMEs,
NA 60 70 80 90 100 110 Survey report MoA, Private sectors.
Agro-industry,
CSA, ESA FDA,
MOCT
Strategic Initiative 4.5: Promote Food Hygienic Practices
Output indicator 4.5.1: % of HH MOH, Academia,
applied food hygienic practices research centers,
NA 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Survey report MOA NGOs, CSA, ESA,
FDA, MOTRI
SI-4
Output indicator 4.5.2: % of value MOTRI, Unions,
chain actors applied food hygienic cooperative,
practices NGOs, SME,
NA 10 20 30 40 50 60 80 Survey report MoA, Private sectors.
Agro-industry,
CSA, ESA, FDA,
MOCT
Strategic Initiative 4.6: Strengthen the implementation of Social behavioral change communication (SBCC)

87
SI-5 Output indicator 6.1: % of households NA 10 20 30 40 50 60 80 Survey report MOA MOH, Academia,
habited the consumption of research
diversified healthy diet centers, NGOs,
UN, Religious
institution
Strategic Objective (SO): 5 Establish/strengthen food and nutrition organizational structure and implementation capacity in the agriculture sector and its
affiliate organizations
Civil Service
Commission
SO-5 Outcome indicator 5: Improved capacity of NS-Agri-food system implementing agriculture sector and affiliate institutions Admin report MoA (CSC), BoA
Strategic Initiative 5.1: Establish/strengthen/support food and nutrition organizational structures in the agricultural sector, including affiliated institutions
at all administrative levels
Output indicator
5.1: # of regions and
SI-1 affiliated institutions that
established/strengthened
food and nutrition 5 153 153 153 153 153 1 54 Admin report MoA CSC, BoA
organizational structure
(1 Federal, 14 regions, 68
zone, 832 woredas and 9
affiliated institutions=92)
Strategic Initiative 5.2: Capacitate the agriculture sector to implement a nutrition-sensitive agri-food systems strategy
Output indicator 5.2: # of
capacitated agriculture
SI-2 sector to implement NS- Agri. Research
AFSS at all levels NA 153 153 153 153 153 1 54 Survey MoA
institutes, HLI
Strategic Initiative 5.3: Support the education sector to incorporate nutrition-sensitive agri-food systems in the primary & high schools
and higher learning institution curricula

88
Output indicator 5.3: #
of NS-Agri-food contents
incorporated in the
NA 1 1 1 Admin report MoA, MoE BoA, BoE
national curriculum (1 at
schools, 1 at ATVET and 1
SI-3 at university)
Strategic Initiative 5.4: Leverage nutrition sensitive agri-food systems interventions into existing and emerging agriculture policies,
strategies, and programs

Output indicator5.4:
# of sub-sectors and
affiliated institutions
that mainstreamed
and implemented food Affiliated
SI-4 NA 3 4 5 2 Admin report MoA
and nutrition policy institutes
and strategy into their
strategies, programs, and
plans (5 MoA sub-sectors
and 9 affiliated institutes)

89
Strategic Initiative 5.5: Ensure intra- and inter nutrition-sensitive agri-food systems coordination at all levels
Output indicator
5.5: # of functional
coordination
platforms established
(steering committee Admin
SI-5 NA 2 6 MoA BoA
and technical report
committee at 2 at
federal, 2 at regional,
2 at Zone and 2 at
woredas)
Strategic Objective (SO) 6: Ensure empowerment and engagement of women, youth, and vulnerable groups in the nutrition-
sensitive agri-food systems

SO-6 Outcome indicator MoWSA,
6: proportion of Research
MoA,
women empowered Institutes
NA 14 14 14 14 14 15 15 Survey
(3,400,000 female-
headed HHs in
agriculture)
Strategic Initiative 6.1: Ensure women’s access to productive resources in the nutrition-sensitive agri-food systems
% of women accessed
SI-1 productive resources MoWSA,
NA 14 14 14 14 14 15 15 MoA Research
Institutes
Strategic Initiative 6.2: Improve women’s decision-making power at the household and community level
SI-2 Output indicator
6.2: Percent of
women empowered
MoWSA,
in decision making
NA 14 14 14 14 14 15 15 Survey MoA, Research
at household and
Institutes
community level

90
Strategic Initiative 6.3: Improve youth engagement and enhance their role in the nutrition-sensitive agri-food systems
Output indicator 6.3: MoWSA,
# of youths benefited Research
SI-3 in the nutrition- Institutes
Admin
sensitive agri-food NA 571,428 571,428 571,428 571,428 571,428 571,428 MoA,
report
systems interventions
(10% of 40 million
youths)
Strategic Initiative 6.4: Ensure vulnerable groups’ access to productive resources and improve their nutritional status
Output indicator 6.4: MoWSA,
# of vulnerable groups Research
SI-4 benefited from the Institutes
nutrition-sensitive
agri-food systems
Admin
(elderly + other NA - 585,714 585,714 585,714 585,714 585,714 585,714 MoA,
report
vulnerable=3,500,000,
disabled 17,000,000
= 20,500,000). Out
of this, 20% will be
benefited)
Strategic Initiative 6.4: Ensure vulnerable groups’ access to productive resources and improve their nutritional status
# of vulnerable groups
SI-4 benefited from the
nutrition-sensitive
MoWSA,
agri-food systems Admin
NA - 585,714 585,714 585,714 585,714 585,714 585,714 MoA, Research
(elderly + other report
Institutes
vulnerable=3,500,000,
disabled 17,000,000 =
20,500,000). Out of this,
20% will be benefited)

91
4.4. Costing of the National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy
Total Budget
Budget Break Down (2024-2030)
Strategic Objective (SO) (USD)
2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
SO 1: Ensure the availability &
accessibility of diverse, safe, and 189,857 9,180,893 10,391,947 7,079,715 6,392,513 5,950,102 5,541,566 44,726,593
nutritious food
SO 2: Enhance the resilience of
vulnerable communities in agrarian, 241,625 9,625,367 10,892,492 7,458,206 6,738,057 6,215,620 5,807,905 46,979,272
agro-pastoral, and pastoral settings
SO 3: Enhance post-harvest
technology, value-addition, quality,
5,819,824 6,401,806 6,983,788 7,565,771 8,147,753 8,729,735 9,311,718 52,960,395
and safety management of food and
feed
SO 4: Enhance the consumption
of diversified, nutritious, safe, and 7,081,266 7,851,883 13,607,451 2,371,696 2,352,199 1,889,531 2,280,671 37,434,697
healthy diet
SO 5: Establish/strengthen food and
nutrition organizational structure
and implementation capacity in the 785,640 668,434 717,316 814,907 763,065 794,859 826,653 5,370,874
agriculture sector and its affiliate
organizations
SO 6: Ensure empowerment and
engagement of women, youth, and
5,790,667 6,172,038 6,465,945 6,759,851 7,053,758 7,347,665 7,641,571 47,231,495
vulnerable groups in the nutrition-
sensitive agri-food systems
Grand Total (USD) 19,908,879 39,900,421 49,058,939 32,050,146 31,447,345 30,927,512 31,410,084 234,703,326

92
List of Core Team Members
S. # Name Organization Contact Address
1 Girma Bekele Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]
2 Alemtsehay Sergawi Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]
3 Dr. Tesfaye Mengistie Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]
4 Tamene Taye Save the Children International [email protected]
5 Esayas Lemma Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]
6 Abdella Negash Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]
7 Tsigereda Fekadu Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]
9 Sintayehu Demissie Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]
10 Maya HagiAli Food and Agriculture Organization [email protected]

93
4.4. Costing of the National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy
S. # Name Organization Contact Address

1 Alemtsehay Sergawi Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]
2 Dr. Wubshet Asnake Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]
3 Daneil Alemu Haramaya University [email protected]
International Livestock danieltemesgen2011@yahoo.
4 Prof. Daniel Temesgen
Research Institute com
Save the Children
5 Dires Beza [email protected]
International
Save the Children Eyasu.Desta@savethechildren.
6 Eyasu Desta
International org
7 Fisseha Tekle MoH (SD) [email protected]
8 Gutu Mijena Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]
9 Dr. Yosef Halala Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]
10 Dr. Kebede Abegaz Hawasa University [email protected]
Save the Children Kebede.Atsebi@savethechildren.
11 Kebede Atsebi
International org
12 Kebeki Urga Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]
13 Kumala Dibaba Jima University [email protected]
14 Markos Mekonnen Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]
Save the Children Mebit.Kebede@savethechildren.

15 Mebit Kebede
International org
16 Melaku Bayable Ministry of Education [email protected]
17 Dr. Mesfin Wogayehu Bahir Dar University [email protected]
18 Muhajer Abdella Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]
19 Dr. Mulugeta Teamir Alive & Thrive [email protected]
Food and Agriculture
20 Senayit Zewdie [email protected]
Organization
21 Shibabaw Yirsaw Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]
22 Sibhat Temesgen Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]
Food and Agriculture

23 Dr. Tefera Darge [email protected]
Organization
24 Hussen Abegaz Private [email protected]

Ministry of Women & Social
25 Yihune Worku [email protected]
Affairs
26 Dr Berhanu Amsalu Consultant [email protected]
27 Aziz Shikur Ministry of Agriculture [email protected]

94

Nutrition Sensitive Agri Food Systems Strategy

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nutrition Sensitive Agri Food Systems Strategy

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Nutrition Sensitive Agri Food Systems Strategy

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy

National Nutrition (2024

Post harvest, Address women,

EDRMC Ethiopian Disaster Risk Management Commission

EIAR Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Institute

The sub-sector of the manufacturing that beneficiates primary

Refers to collection of principles to apply for on-farm production

Refers to a set of guidelines and practices designed to ensure

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

Nutrition- A food-based approach to agricultural development that puts

Nutrition- Innovative tools, techniques, and approaches that are designed to

Any actor/individual that uses at least one technology that

The additions of time, place, and/or form utility to a commodity

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

Ethiopia introduced its National Nutrition Sensitive Agriculture (NSA) Strategy in

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

The development of the Nutrition-Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy involved

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

Despite multi-sectoral interventions in the country, ensuring food and nutrition

The Ethiopian government is actively seeking investments to improve the socio-

Agriculture needs to be nutrition-sensitive to improve nutritious food availability

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

The Nutrition-Sensitive Agri-food Systems Strategy (2024–2030) has been developed

1.1. Policy and strategy analysis of Nutrition in the agri-food systems

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

Ethiopia is fully committed to achieving the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

The National Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture Strategy (NNSAS; 2017-2021) has been

The current National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (NS-AFSS;

2.3. Theory of Change

The Theory of Change (ToC) for Nutrition-Sensitive Agri-food Systems provides

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

the desired impact.

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

The following are the key guiding principles of the NS-AFSS:

• Participatory approach and community centered

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

3.2. Strategic Objectives

The NS-AFSS has the following six strategic objectives (SOs):

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

nutritious food (million)

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

Output indicator 2: Number of beneficiaries increased nutrient-dense crop

production (in million)

Potato, High Zn Rice,

% Increase in the areas of 74,416.3 35 %

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

production nutrient-dense crops increment Lead: MoA

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

Strategic Initiative 2: Enhance livestock and fishery production

Output indicator 1፡ Yield increment of animal products in (tons/liters/numbers)

Output indicator 2: Yield increment in feed/forage in million tons

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

# of inputs provided Lead: MoA

National Nutrition Sensitive Agri-Food Systems Strategy (2024 – 2030)

Output indicator 1: % increment in agro-ecology-based crop cultivation