2020 Development and Validation of A Stability-Indicati
2020 Development and Validation of A Stability-Indicati
2020 Development and Validation of A Stability-Indicati
The applicability of a quality by design framework for the development of a sensitive, simple and selective,
stability-indicating reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography analytical method for the
analysis of captopril was investigated. Design of experiments using a central composite design approach was
used for method development. Twenty experimental runs were performed with acetonitrile content ranging
between 28 and 36 % v/v, pH from 2.8 to 3.6 and temperature between 22° and 32°. The experimental data
obtained was used to derive a quadratic model for the retention time of captopril. The optimized method
produced sharp peaks with good resolution (>2) for captopril and the internal standard with retention times
of 3.1 and 6.2 min, respectively. The experimental data revealed that acetonitrile content in the mobile phase
and pH are significant factors that affect the retention time and resolution of captopril. Normal probability
plots revealed that the residual and predicted data fall approximately on a straight line, indicating that
the experimental error for these studies was evenly distributed suggesting that the model could be used
to navigate the design space. This approach is useful to expedite method development and optimization
activities in analytical laboratories.
Key words: Quality by Design, experimental design, forced degradation studies, stability indicating,
captopril, RP-HPLC
Captopril (CP) is an orally active antihypertensive that successfully developed but no information in respect
acts by inhibiting the angiotensin converting enzyme of degradation studies was included[8]. The ICH Q1A
and preventing the conversion of angiotensin I to (R2)[11] guideline suggested that stress testing of
angiotensin II[1]. Due to the lack of a strong chromophore, an active pharmaceutical ingredient can facilitate
CP does not absorb UV radiation at high wavelengths. identification of likely degradation products, which
It is relatively unstable in solutions of pH >3.8 in in turn permits degradation pathways and the intrinsic
which it oxidizes to form a disulphide dimer[2]. Several stability of the molecule to be elucidated due to the
methods have been reported for the analysis of CP using stability-indicating power of the analytical procedure
spectrophotometry, fluorimetry gas chromatography[3], developed.
high pressure liquid chromatography with UV-
Routine practice when developing HPLC methods
detection[4-7], electro-chemical detection (ECD)[8] and
relies on the change “one factor at a time” approach
capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE)[9]. Reversed-phase
which is time-consuming and does not completely
high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC)
demonstrate the flexibility of an analytical method[12,13].
is a method of choice for analysis in the pharmaceutical
During initial method development studies, parameters
industry. A method using CZE and UV-detection for
CP has been reported[9]. A stability indicating liquid
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
chromatography analytical method for the analysis Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which
of CP has been reported, however, robustness and allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially,
as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under
the method optimization approach used were not the identical terms
discussed[10] and a RP-HPLC method with ECD for
Accepted 17 November 2018
CP using a design of experiments (DoE) approach was
Revised 16 April 2018
Received 12 April 2017
*Address for correspondence
E-mail: [email protected] Indian J Pharm Sci 2019;81(1):45-56
material to C18 chains of the stationary phase packing of three key components viz., ACN composition
material. A new Phenomenex Luna 150×4.6 mm i.d of the mobile phase, pH and column temperature
5 μm C18 column was used throughout the study. To was undertaken followed by optimization of
minimize the effect of solvent impurities all analyses chromatographic conditions using prediction software.
was performed using HPLC grade ACN. Process Experimentally derived data was modelled and a
related variables of HPLC instruments and analytical number of chromatographic conditions predicted
techniques include mobile phase composition and based on that data, were identified and evaluated. This
pH, flow rate, injection volume, column temperature, approach to optimisation was selected after considering
detector wavelength and may have a serious impact on all method attributes and based on the assumption that
HPLC responses. Early method development studies the factors investigated would be reliable, thereby
facilitated identification of initial conditions for the limiting the amount of work required to demonstrate
separation. An injection volume of 20 μl and a flow the robustness of the analytical method.
rate of 1 ml/min and a wavelength of 210 nm were DoE is an approach that enables scientists to evaluate
used for the analysis. Parameters such as flow rate, the effect and interactions of a number of variables on
column, injection volume, instrumentation variables an output simultaneously using a limited number of
were considered controllable and were kept constant experiments. From the data generated in preliminary
within the experimental domain whereas mobile studies when developing a separation for CP, limits
phase composition, pH and column temperature were for experimental levels were identified. The five
identified as critical process parameters that had to be coded levels for the independent variables in the
investigated to establish the robustness of the analytical rotatable CCD were set at –α, –1, 0, +1 and +α and the
method[31]. Environmental factors such as temperature corresponding experimental levels used, are listed in
and relative humidity, proper maintenance and level of Table 1.
knowledge of the analyst when handling instruments The upper and lower limits for ACN content (x1) were
may also interfere with the quality of the analysis. 28 and 36 % v/v, respectively. The axial points were set
An efficient and comprehensive experimental design at 26 and 38 % v/v and for mobile phase pH (x2) were
based on systematic and simultaneous examination 3.6 and 2.8 with the lower and upper limits for the axial
Proper
pH of mobile phase maintenance/
surroundings
Fig. 1: Ishikawa diagram showing factors that may impact key method attributes
January-February 2019 Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 49
www.ijpsonline.com
points set at 2.5 and 3.8. The minimum and maximum and quadratic terms with positive coefficients were
column temperatures (x3) were 22 and 32° and the directly proportional, whereas the negative terms have
lower and upper axial levels were set at 20 and 35°. The an inverse relationship to the response. The interaction
critical responses monitored were retention time (y1), terms x1x2 and x2x3 had an agonistic effect on the
resolution (y2) and peak tailing (y3). System suitability, retention time of CP whereas x1x3, had an antagonistic
precision, accuracy and specificity were considered effect. The polynomial equations for critical quality
as important method performance characteristics. responses are represented mathematically in Eqn. 1.1,
The experiments were performed randomly in order 1.2 and 1.3, respectively. y1 = 2.84–0.39x1+0.17x2–
to eliminate any possible experimental bias and 0.0070x3+0.068x12+0.11x22-0.0071x32+0.019x1 x2-
the resultant HPLC data from 20 experiments with 0.051x1 x3+0.011x2 x3 (Eqn. 1.1); y2 = 3.23–0.93x1-
8 factorial points, 6 axial and 6 centre points were 0.33x 2 –0.079x 3 +0.18x 1 2 -0.15x 2 2 +0.14x 3 2 -0.077x 1
analysed and are summarized in Table 2. x2+0.14x1 x3-0.11x2 x3 (Eqn. 1.2); y3 = 1.07+0.21x1+0
.11x2+0.077x 3+0.059x 12+0.066x 22+0.038x 32+0.099x 1
Statistical analyses were used to generate second-order
x2+0.069x1 x3-0.016x2 x3 (Eqn. 1.3). ANOVA results
quadratic equations that best fitted the experimental data
suggest that the response surface quadratic model for
in addition to prediction of responses. The polynomial
the three responses was significant and adequate. The
equation that was generated following fitting of
data for retention time, resolution and peak tailing are
experimental data represents the quantitative values
summarized in Table 3. The accurate response factors
for coefficients of independent variables, first order
with a low standard deviation can be predicted by
main effects, higher order effects and their interactions
the model as the correlation coefficient R2 is close to
for retention time. The HPLC variables x1, x2 and x3
unity. The results of modelling the data reveal that
TABLE 1: ACTUAL AND CODED LEVELS FOR the R2 value was >0.9 indicating that there is a good
HPLC VARIABLES INVESTIGATED correlation between the experimental and predicted
Real values for the coded levels responses for this model[32].
Variables -α +α
-1 0 +1
(1.68) (1.68) The R2 values for responses y1, y2 and y3 were 0.9852,
ACN content (x1) % v/v 26 28 32 36 38 0.9259 and 0.7107, and the predicted and experimental
pH (x2) 2.5 2.8 3.2 3.6 3.8 values were found to be in good agreement for y1 as
Temperature (x3)° 20 22 27 32 35 the predicted R2 value was 0.8776, thereby indicating
TABLE 2: CODED LEVELS FOR THE CCD EXPERIMENTAL DOMAIN AND RESULTANT RESPONSES
ACN pH Temp Retention time minutes Resolution Peak tailing
Run % v/v (x2) (°) (y1) (y2) (y3)
Standard Point
number
(x1) (x3)
14 1 Axial 0 0 1.68 2.79 3.08 1.25
16 2 Centre 0 0 0 2.81 3.24 1
10 3 Axial 1.68 0 0 2.36 2.15 1.25
5 4 Factorial -1 -1 1 3.27 4.94 0.87
1 5 Factorial -1 -1 -1 3.31 4.8 0.83
18 6 Centre 0 0 0 2.86 3.09 1
6 7 Factorial 1 -1 1 2.46 3.08 1.5
2 8 Factorial 1 -1 -1 2.48 2.84 1.16
9 9 Axial -1.68 0 0 3.69 4.77 1.12
15 10 Centre 0 0 0 2.84 3.4 1.16
20 11 Centre 0 0 0 2.85 3.18 1.25
17 12 Centre 0 0 0 2.85 3.17 1
7 13 Factorial -1 1 1 3.66 3.98 1
19 14 Centre 0 0 0 2.86 3.37 1
4 15 Factorial 1 1 -1 2.9 2.02 1.75
12 16 Axial 0 1.68 0 3.5 2 1.25
8 17 Factorial 1 1 1 2.7 2.27 2
13 18 Axial 0 0 -1.68 2.83 3.64 1
11 19 Axial 0 -1.68 0 2.8 3.08 1.16
3 20 Factorial -1 1 -1 3.43 4.75 1
50 Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences January-February 2019
www.ijpsonline.com
reasonably good agreement with the adjusted R value 2
significant effect on the retention time of CP. The 2D
of 0.9720. However, the predicted R2 value of 0.4573 contour depicted in fig. 2 reveals that an increase in
for response y2 is not close in value to the adjusted ACN content in the mobile phase whilst maintaining
R2 value of 0.8592 and may be indicative of a large a constant pH and temperature results in a decrease
block effect for the prediction of this response when in the retention time of CP whereas an increase in
using this model. A negative predicted R2 value of the pH of mobile phase at constant temperature and
–0.9615 was observed for response y3 implying that ACN content results in longer retention times for the
the overall mean value of 1.18 is a better predictor of drug. A higher proportion of ACN in the mobile phase
the model responses than the coefficient of regression. results in a high elution strength with a consequent
Further, adequate precision measures the signal-to- reduction in the retention time of CP due to a change
noise ratio and a desirable ratio to produce an adequate in the polarity of the mobile phase. CP is a weak acid
signal should be >4. All responses exhibited adequate with a pKa of 2.8 and therefore a change in the pH has
precision values >4, indicating that the model is a significant effect on the retention of CP and elution
adequate to navigate the DS. The relatively low value is therefore pH-dependent[33]. The normal probability
for the coefficient of variation indicates the precision plot of residuals for retention time reveals that the
and reliability of the experiments. ANOVA was used to data points were distributed along a straight line
estimate the quality of the quadratic regression models (fig. 3A) indicating that the error was equally distributed
and to validate the response surface models[32]. across each individual point. The plot of actual versus
The F-values of 507.12 and 97.01 and p-values predicted values (fig. 3B) reveals that all points fall
<0.001 for x1 and x2 indicate that these factors have a nearly in the same region, confirming that the model
could be used to predict response values for specific
TABLE 3: ANOVA DATA FOR RESPONSE SURFACE and independent input values.
QUADRATIC MODEL FOR RETENTION TIME
Retention The resolution (Rs) between CP and PB was considered
Statistical Resolution Peak tailing
parameter
time
(y2) (y3)
an important factor for the development of this method.
minutes (y1) The 2D contour plot depicted in fig. 2 reveals that
F-value 507.12 99.65 13.83
an increase in ACN content resulted in a significant
P-value <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0040
Regression decrease in resolution between the compounds. An
0.9852 0.9259 0.7107
coefficient(R2) increase in the pH of the mobile phase only, resulted
Predicted R2 0.8776 0.4573 -0.9615 in a slight decrease in resolution as pH influences
Adjusted R2 0.9720 0.8592 0.4503 the degree of ionization of CP and ionic species are
Mean 2.96 3.34 1.18
favourably bound to silica sites on the stationary phase,
Standard
deviation
0.064 0.34 0.21 reducing the resolution between the peaks yet resulting
Adequate in acceptable resolution with Rs >2 for all studies. The
29.259 13.482 6.054
precision addition of an organic solvent in RP-HPLC results
C.V. % 2.18 10.27 18.10 in a low Rs due to interactions of the mobile phase
A. B. C.
Design-Expert® Software
Retention Time
Factor Coding: Actual ResolutionFactor
Design-Expert® Software
Coding: Actual Peak tailing
1.00 Resolution 1.00 Peak tailing 1.00
Design Points Design Points
4.94 2
3.4
2 0.83
1.4
B: pH
B: pH
0.00 6 0.00
4 6 6
0.00
2.6
Fig. 2: Contour plot depicting the impact of ACN content and pH on (A) the retention time of CP, (B) the resolution factor, (C) peak
tailing of CP
January-February 2019 Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 45
www.ijpsonline.com
components with the surfaces of the stationary phase A. Normal Plot of Residuals
in competition with analyte molecules for these sites.
The resolution for the optimized chromatographic 99
Normal % Probability
80
70
the stationary phase. The optimized method resulted in B. Predicted vs. Actual
3.40
Predicted
and resulted in the improvement of conditions to
3.00
22
ensure a superior response within a set of targeted 2.80
method generated using Design-Expert software were 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.20 3.40 3.60 3.80
Fig. 5: Chromatograms
Captopril disulphide (CD) (J), degradation of CP in water at 100° (A), 1 M HCl at 80° (B), 0.1 M NaOH at 60° (C), 3 % v/v H2O2
(D) following photolysis for 24 h in acidic medium (E), alkaline medium (F), in neutral medium (G), in the solid state (H) and
exposure to dry heat at 100° (I)
addition the method, when operated in the defined DS, of CP, confirming a rapid, stability indicating method
will ensure the generation of high quality analytical had been developed. The use of DoE and QbD ensured
data from which informed formulation development the identification of robust ranges for the operating
decisions can be made. CP was found to be stable under conditions thereby ensuring the possibility of efficient
acidic conditions but undergoes significant degradation application of the method in a regulatory context. In
under photolytic conditions in the solid state and in conclusion a new, rapid and comprehensive RP-HPLC
solution. This approach to method development was method that is simple, precise, accurate, selective,
selected by considering all method attributes and specific and stability-indicating for the analysis of
assuming that several equipment and process factors CP has been successfully developed using a QbD
would be reliable so as to limit the amount of work approach. The method could be operated effectively
required to demonstrate the robustness of the analytical within the defined DS with the assurance that the data
method. Whilst CP is an official USP compound and generated are reliable and valid.
the analytical method reported in the USP is suitable
Acknowledgments:
for the analysis of the molecule, the retention time is
4.0 min[35] whereas this method exhibits an elution time The authors thank the Rhodes University Research
for CP of 3.0 min. Furthermore the results of forced Committee (RBW) and the National Research
degradation studies revealed no shift in the elution time Foundation (NRF) of South Africa (KV) for funding.
48 Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences January-February 2019
www.ijpsonline.com
Conflict of interest: 17. Pebdan, AA, Shabani AMH, Dadfarnia S, Talebianpoor MS,
Khodadoust S. Preconcentration of valsartan by dispersive
liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of
None. floating organic drop and its determination in urine sample:
Central composite design. J Sep Sci 2016;39:1935-44.
REFERENCES 18. Sahu PK, Swain S, Prasad GVS, Panda J, Murthy YLN.
1. Kathleen P, Martindale W. Martindale: The Complete Drug RP-HPLC Method for determination of metaxalone using
Reference. 32nd ed. London, UK: Pharmaceutical Press; 1999. Box-Behnken experimental design. J Appl Biopharm
2. Mahmoud WMM, Kümmerer K. Captopril and its dimer Pharmacokinet 2015;2: 40-9.
captopril disulfide: Photodegradation, aerobic biodegradation 19. Sathiyasundar R, Valliappan K. Experimental design
and identification of transformation products by HPLC-UV approach to optimization of the new commercial RP-HPLC
and LC-ion trap-MS(n). Chemosphere 2012;88:1170-7. discrimination conditions for the estimation of paracetamol
3. Franklin ME, Addison RS, Baker PV, Hooper WD. Improved and zaltaprofen in pharmaceutical formulation. Int J Pharm
analytical procedure for the measurement of captopril in Sci Res 2015;6:183.
human plasma by gas chromatography--mass spectrometry 20. Ferreira SLC, Bruns RE, da Silva EGP, dos Santos WNL,
and its application to pharmacokinetic studies. J Chromatogr Quintella CM, David JM, et al. Statistical designs and response
B Biomed Sci Appl 1998;705:47-54. surface techniques for the optimization of chromatographic
4. Mirza T, Tan HSI. Determination of captopril in pharmaceutical systems. J Chromatogr A 2007;1158:2-14.
tablets by anion-exchange HPLC using indirect photometric 21. Bezerra MA, Santelli RE, Oliveira EP, Villar LS, Escaleira
detection; a study in systematic method development. J Pharm LA. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for
Biomed Anal 2001;25:39-52. optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta 2008;76:965-77.
5. Huang T, He Z, Yang B, Shao L, Zheng X, Duan G. Simultaneous 22. Junker B, Zablackis E, Verch T, Schofield T, Douette P.
determination of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide in human Quality-by-Design: As Related to Analytical Concepts,
plasma by reverse-phase HPLC from linear gradient elution. J Control and Qualification. In: Nunnally BK, Turula VE,
Pharm Biomed Anal 2006;41:644-8. Sitrin RD, editors. Vaccine Analysis: Strategies, Principles,
6. Siddiqui FA, Sher N, Shafi N, Bahadur SS. Simultaneous and Control. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2015. p.
Determination of metformin, captopril, lisinopril, and 479-520.
enalapril: its application to pharmacokinetics. Arab J Chem 23. Elder D, Borman P. Improving analytical method reliability
2013;11:35. across the entire product lifecycle using QbD approaches.
7. Ivanovic D, Medenica M, Malenovic A, Jancic B. Validation Pharm Outsourcing 2013;14:14-9.
of the RP-HPLC method for analysis of hydrochlorothiazide 24. Peraman R, Bhadraya K, Reddy YP. Analytical quality by
and captopril in tablets. Accredit Qual Assur 2004;9:76-81. design : A tool for regulatory flexibility and robust analytics.
8. Khamanga SM, Walker RB. The use of experimental design in Int J Anal Chem 2015;2015:868727.
the development of an HPLC-ECD method for the analysis of 25. Ishikawa K, Lu DJ. What is total quality control?: the Japanese
captopril. Talanta 2011;83:1037-49. way. New Jersey, United States: Prentice Hall; 1985.
9. Hillaert S, Van Den Bossche W. Determination of captopril 26. Vogt FG, Kord AS. Development of quality by design
and its degradation products by capillary electrophoresis. J analytical methods. J Pharm Sci 2011;100:797-812.
Pharm Biomed Anal 1999;21:65-73. 27. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Validation of a
10. Stulzer HK, Tagliari MP, Kuminek G, Oliveira PR, Bertol analytical Procedures : text and methodology Q2(R1).
CD, Silva MAS. Development and validation of stability Available from: https://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_
indicating LC method to quantify captopril in tablets of Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q2_R1/Step4/Q2_
controlled release. Chromatographia 2009;69:123-8. R1__Guideline.pdf.
11. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance for Industry. 28. Garg LK, Reddy VS, Sait SS, Krishnamurthy T, Vali SJ, Reddy
Stability testing of New Drug Substances and Products AM. Quality by design: Design of experiments approach prior
Q1A(R2). Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/ to the validation of a stability-indicating HPLC method for
drugs/guidances/ucm073369.pdf. Montelukast. Chromatographia 2013;76:1697-706.
12. Rahmani A, Selamat J, Soleimany F. Ochratoxin A and 29. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for Industry:
zearalenone using an experimental design. Food Addit Contam Analytical Procedures and Methods Validation for Drugs and
Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 2011;28:902-12. Biologics. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER);
13. Singh B, Raza K, Beg S. Developing optimized drug products 2014. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/
employing designed experiments. Chem Ind Dig 2013;12:1-7. guidances/ucm386366.pdf.
14. Sangshetti JN, Zahe Z. Application of QbD in development 30. Schweitzer M, Pohl M, Hanna-Brown M, Nethercote P,
and validation of a rapid RP-HPLC method for determination Borman P, Hansen G, et al. Implications and opportunities of
of atazanavir in bulk drug. J Med Chem Drug Discov applying QbD principles to analytical measurements. Pharm
2015;32:385-401. Technol 2010;34:1-5.
15. Monks KE, Rieger HJ, Molnár I. Expanding the term “Design 31. Garg LK, Sait SS, Krishnamurthy T, Kumar CHRP. Quality
Space” in high performance liquid chromatography (I). J by Design (QbD): Practical experimental design approach by
Pharm Biomed Anal 2011;56:874-9. blocking and varying certain factors of a stability-indicating
16. Wu H, Khan MA. Quality‐by‐design (QbD): An integrated HPLC method for simultaneous determination of omeprazole
approach for evaluation of powder blending process kinetics and ketoprofen. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 2015;38:677-
and determination of powder blending end‐point. J Pharm Sci 86.
2009;98:2784-98. 32. Ahuja M, Yadav M, Kumar S. Application of response surface
January-February 2019 Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 49
www.ijpsonline.com
methodology to formulation of ionotropically gelled gum act as prodrugs: disposition of the disulfide dimer of captopril
cordia/gellan beads. Carbohydr Polym 2010;80:161-7. in the rat. Biochem Pharmacol 1984;33:3567-71.
33. Watson DG. Pharmaceutical Analysis: A Textbook for 35. Leanpolchareanchai J, Suksiriworapong J. Validation of
Pharmacy Students and Pharmaceutical Chemists. Edinburgh, analytical method for captopril extemporaneous preparations
Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 1999. by high performance liquid chromatography. Pharm Sci Asia
34. Drummer OH, Jarrott B. Captopril disulfide conjugates may 2015;42(2):85-92.