Resources and Reserves Garpenberg 2023-12-31 1
Resources and Reserves Garpenberg 2023-12-31 1
Resources and Reserves Garpenberg 2023-12-31 1
Garpenberg
Prepared by
Morvan Derrien
Table of Contents
1 Summary 4
1.1 Competence 5
2 General introduction 6
2.1 Pan-European Standard for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral
Resources and Mineral Reserves – The PERC Reporting Standard
6
2.2 Definitions 6
2.2.1 Mineral Resource 7
2.2.2 Mineral Reserve 7
3 Garpenberg 8
3.1 Project Outline 8
3.2 Major changes 2023 8
3.2.1 Technical studies 8
3.3 Location 8
3.4 History 10
3.5 Ownership 11
3.6 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) 11
3.6.1 Existing permits 11
3.6.2 Necessary permits 13
3.6.3 Environmental, Social and Governance considerations 13
3.7 Geology 15
3.7.1 Regional and Local Geology 15
3.7.2 Mineralization 17
3.8 Drilling procedures and data 18
3.8.1 Drilling techniques and downhole surveying 18
3.8.2 Collar and downhole surveying 19
3.8.3 Logging 19
3.8.4 Sampling 19
3.8.5 Density 19
3.8.6 Analysis and QAQC 20
3.9 Exploration activities and infill drilling 22
3.9.1 Near mine exploration 22
3.9.2 Infill drilling 23
3.10 Mining methods, mineral processing and infrastructure 23
3.10.1 Mining methods 23
3.10.2 Mineral processing 25
3.11 Prices, terms and costs 26
3.12 Mineral resources 27
3.13 Mineral Reserves 30
3.14 Comparison with previous year/estimation 33
4 References 38
Appendix 1 – History
In 2023 the total Mineral Reserves in Garpenberg decreased by 8.4 Mt (million metric tonnes) to
100.9 Mt. Measured and Indicated Resources in Garpenberg remained unchanged at 21.6 Mt. Inferred
Resources slightly increased by 0.5 Mt to 67.9 Mt.
Table 1-1. Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves in Garpenberg 2023-12-31.
2023 2022
kton Au Ag Cu Zn Pb kton Au Ag Cu Zn Pb
Classification (g/t) (g/t) (% ) (% ) (% ) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (%)
Mineral Reserves
Proved 17 200 0.25 98 0.04 3.0 1.3 18 658 0.24 97 0.04 3.1 1.32
Probable 83 700 0.31 88 0.05 2.5 1.2 90 640 0.30 85 0.04 2.5 1.14
Total 100 900 0.3 90 0.04 2.6 1.2 109 298 0.29 87 0.04 2.6 1.17
Mineral Resourcess
Measured 100 0.24 108 0.03 2.8 1.0 68 0.24 108 0.03 2.8 1.04
Indicated 21 600 0.41 70 0.06 2.7 1.3 21 556 0.41 70 0.06 2.7 1.32
Total M&I 21 600 0.41 70 0.06 2.7 1.3 21 624 0.41 70 0.06 2.7 1.32
Inferred 67 900 0.34 57 0.05 2.3 1.1 67 413 0.34 57 0.05 2.3 1.10
Multiple participants have been involved and contributed to this summary report. Roles and
responsibilities are listed in Table 1-2.
Table 1-2. Contributors and responsible competent persons for this report.
The report has been verified and approved by Sofia Höglund who is employed by Boliden as a Senior
Resource Geologist and is a member of FAMMP1. Sofia Höglund has 15 years of experience in the
Exploration and Mining Industry.
Nils Eriksson works for Boliden as Head of Department for Permitting and Environmental support.
Nils Eriksson is a member of FAMMP and has more than 25 years of experience from the Mining
Industry.
Anders Sand works as Research Manager of Boliden Mines, with expertise particularly in mineral
processing. Anders Sand is a member of FAMMP and has more than 15 years experience in the
mining industry. He also holds appointments as docent and associate professor in mineral processing
at Luleå University of Technology since 2017.
This report is issued annually to inform the public (shareholders and potential investors) of the
mineral assets in Garpenberg held by Boliden. The report is a summary of internal / Competent
Persons’ Reports for Garpenberg. Boliden method of reporting Mineral Resources and Mineral
Reserves intends to comply with the Pan-European Reserves and Resources Reporting Committee
(PERC) “PERC Reporting Standard 2021”.
The PERC Reporting Standard is an international reporting standard that has been adopted by the
mining associations in Sweden (SveMin), Finland (FinnMin) and Norway (Norsk Bergindustri), to be
used for exploration and mining companies within the Nordic countries.
Boliden is reporting Mineral Resources exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
PERC is the organisation responsible for setting standards for public reporting of Exploration
Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves by companies listed on markets in Europe. PERC
is a member of CRIRSCO, the Committee for Mineral Reserves International Reporting Standards,
and the PERC Reporting Standard is fully aligned with the CRIRSCO Reporting Template.
The PERC standard sets out minimum standards, recommendations and guidelines for Public
Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves in Europe.
2.2 Definitions
Public Reports on Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and/or Mineral Reserves must only use
terms set out in the PERC standard.
Figure 2-1. General relationship between Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (PERC 2021).
Garpenberg is a Zn-Pb-Ag-(Cu-Au) underground mine where the ore is mined from between 450
metres to more than 1 400 metres below surface. The mine encompasses several polymetallic ore
bodies. See Figure 3-5 and Figure 3-6.
The mined out ore tonnage in 2023 totaled 3151 Kton. More than 75% of the mined tonnage derived
from the largest ore body, Lappberget.
Zinc and silver are the most valuable commodities in Garpenberg. Zinc and silver both accounted
for about 36% of the revenue followed by lead at 16% and copper-gold at 12%.
3.3 Location
The Garpenberg operation is located in the Hedemora municipality in central Sweden 180 km NW
of Stockholm at coordinates (WGS84) latitude 60° 19’ 27”N, longitude 16° 13’ 38”. Figure 3-1 and
Figure 3-2 show the geographic location and the surface right concessions of Garpenberg.
Figure 3-2. Detailed map of Boliden’s Garpenberg exploration, exploitation, and surface rights concessions (i.e. green,
orange, and red, respectively) in relation to the town of Garpenberg and the city of Stockholm.
Historical documents show that systematic mining has been conducted in Garpenberg since the 13th
century. A recent study from lake sediments published in 2017, however, push back the evidence for
early ore mining in Garpenberg even further, from the Middle Ages to the pre-Roman Iron Age
around 400 BC (Bindler et al. 2017). The Garpenberg mine has been run by multiple companies over
the years. In 1957 Boliden acquired the Garpenberg mine from AB Zinkgruvor. A total of 66.5 Mt
of ore has been processed since Boliden took over the operations (Table 3-1).
A chronological list of historically significant events is presented in appendix 1.
Table 3-1. Annual production numbers 1957-2023. Between 1957 and 1995 the processed ore tonnes and grades are
presented with 5-year intervals, while figures for mined ore are missing. From 2005 to 2014, ore from the Lovisagruvan
mine was also processed in Garpenberg. A total of 63.4 Mt of ore has been processed since Boliden acquired the mine
from AB Zinkgruvor in 1957.
Mineral Resources for new ore bodies are defined by the exploration department by drilling the
mineralized rock body in a 50 x 50 m grid, aiming to produce an Inferred or Indicated Resource.
This is typically followed up by denser drilling carried out by the mine department resulting in a
Measured Resource and eventually a Mineral Reserve. More on Mineral Resources and Mineral
Reserves in chapters 3.12 and 3.13, respectively.
The Mineral Reserve estimates are constantly being revised against the metal grades of the actual
mined tonnage through the reconciliation process, see chapter 3.15.
3.5 Ownership
Boliden has the necessary environmental permits in place to operate the mine. The main permit, in
accordance with the Swedish Environmental Act, was issued by the Swedish Environmental Court
in 2012 (M461-11 2012-01-31) and the final discharge limits to water were set in 2016 (M461-11
2016-04-15). In 2018, Boliden applied for some changes in the permit which were approved in
December 2018 (M467-18, 2018-12-20). These changes in the permit allow Boliden to deposit waste-
rock according to life-of-mine plan.
In 2021, Boliden got a new extension permit (M7041-20, 21-06-15) for extracting and processing up
to 3.5 Mtpa of ore in Garpenberg, without changing anything else in the conditions of
the environmental permit. The only supplement in the permit is a discharge limit for uranium to
water.
The permit allows Boliden to operate the mine as described in the application and in particular to
(chapter 9 Environmental Act):
extract and process up to 3.5 Mtpa of ore in Garpenberg,
deposit tailings in the Ryllshyttan tailings management facility (TMF) and backfill the mine.
In addition, the permit allows Boliden to (chapter 11 Environmental Act):
raise the dams at Ryllshyttan TMF to the level of +256m with the maximum water level of
+254 m and to construct a new outlet,
extend the waste-rock dumps,
set the financial guarantee for closure to 490 MSek,
raise the water level in the clarification pond to the level of +227.9 m,
3.7 Geology
3.7.1 Regional and Local Geology
The Garpenberg supracrustal inlier (Figure 3-4) is situated in the mineralized Palaeoproterozoic
igneous province of Bergslagen, south central Sweden. The region has been actively explored since
the 12th century and is host to a variety of ore deposits, predominantly Fe-oxide deposits and to a
lesser extent, polymetallic sulphide deposits (Bindler et al. 2017).
Garpenberg is the largest sulphide deposit in the region and consists of multiple polymetallic deposits
hosted within a NE-SW trending tight to isoclinal syncline which is ca. 15 km long and 7 km wide
(Vivallo 1985). This syncline is compressed at the southern end and opens to the north with a sub-
vertical axial plane (Allen et al. 2003). The deposits are, for the most part, hosted along the same
stratigraphic level within the predominantly rhyolitic sequence.
3.7.1.1 Stratigraphy
This succession is interpreted to have been originally formed within a large, shallow marine
depositional environment where pyroclastic flow material was abundant during multiple periods of
volcanic activity (Allen et al. 2003). Bedforms and facies associations indicate that the thick footwall
succession accumulated mainly below the wave base prior to a change in conditions that enabled the
formation of the limestone unit that is intrinsically linked to the Garpenberg sulphide deposits (Allen
et al. 1996). The footwall consists of rhyolitic pumiceous, graded mass-flow breccia and rhyolitic ash-
siltstone and sandstone affected by strong phlogopite-biotite-cordierite-sericite-quartz alteration.
Figure 3-6. Top view of the Garpenberg ore bodies. Colours according to resource category.
3.8.3 Logging
The drill core is logged by Boliden geologists and sampled by Boliden technical personnel. The type
of drill hole (i.e. exploration or infill) dictates the amount of detail logged. However, features that
are always logged include: lithological units, fractures, level of schistosity, and content of talc. Core
losses over 20 cm are registered in the log. Logging information is recorded in WellCAD software
before being exported and sent to the database administrators. The logging information is used in
the design of the 3D geological models.
3.8.4 Sampling
Sampling intervals are selected considering the degree of mineralization of primarily Zn, Pb, Ag and
Cu. Moreover, sampling is done to have full coverage over mineralization and adjacent low-grade
halo. The length of the sample sections is 1.0-2.5 m. Samples do not cross lithological boundaries
and are selected to represent consistent degrees of mineralization when possible. Core loss intervals
are not sampled and therefore do not get assigned any assay values.
For infill drillholes, the whole core is usually sampled, leaving no core left in the core boxes.
Exploration drill holes are sawed in half along the drill core axis and one half is sent for analysis
while the other half is stored in Boliden’s core archive.
3.8.5 Density
Density formulas have been calculated in Garpenberg based on available specific gravity (SG) data
and the formulas are reviewed at each resource estimation. The density formulas provided in Table
3-2 are used to assign densities in Garpenberg. Historically, SG measurements were not conducted
frequently, but today more data is available to verify formulas. Since 2022, SG measurements on
pulps are routinely conducted by ALS Laboratories on all the samples that are sent for analysis.
Historically, a great number of samples are missing S assays, therefore, a calculated value for S has
been applied in some areas for those samples. The calculated S value is only used in density
calculations.
* La Ce Pr Nd Pm Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu
¨ Ac Th Pa U Np Pu Am Cm Bk Cf Es Fm Md No Lr
ME-OG46 ME-MS61
Figure 3-7. Front view with 2022 Reserves & Resources. 2023 Near mine drilling in red.
Significant complications were encountered with directional drilling which ultimately was a failure.
However, increased understanding of the stratigraphy during these attempts led to the identification
of an optimal collar location from which conventional core drilling successfully intersected the depth
extent of Stationen below 1500 z. The single successful attempt at drilling below 1500 z intersected
significant massive sulphide mineralization and showed that the prospective dolomite host extends
below 1600 z.
Over 95% of the mined ore in Garpenberg is extracted by sublevel stoping (also called longhole
stoping), where the ore is mined in layers between two drifts vertically 25-35 metres apart. Most areas
are mined with transversal longhole stoping, where the development and stope axis are perpendicular
to the strike of the ore body. In some more narrow areas, longitudinal longhole stoping is used. The
orientation of this method is along or parallel to the strike of the ore body. The ore body is split into
primary and secondary stopes, which are mined in a predefined order and pyramid shape sequence.
The standard stope dimensions are 22-35 m high, 10 m wide for primary stopes and 15 m wide for
secondary stopes, with some local variation in dimensions.
Another consideration concerning the mine design of Lappberget is the division into a main and a
second pass sequence (2pass). The main sequence contains more of the high-grade areas and is
scheduled prior to the second pass sequence, which in general contains lower grade ore (Figure 3-9).
a) b)
Figure 3-9. Example of mine design in Lappberget
a) High grades layout – main sequence; b) Main sequence (high grades) and 2pass (low grades).
Other rarely used mining methods include cut and fill and avoca (rill) (Table 3-5). With the cut and
fill method, mining is carried out in slices along the steeply dipping, narrow ore body. The bottom
Mine reconciliation is the comparison of the planned stopes against the actual outcome.
Table 3-6 shows the reconciliation for the large-scale mining methods in 2020 and 2021.
Table 3-6. Reconciliation for longhole stoping 2021 and 2022. Average overbreak includes overbreak ore.
Ore mucked from a stope is tipped into an ore pass or loaded directly on truck. Transport to the
crushers is done by trucks from the active mining areas. There are two underground crushing plants
at 700z and 1087z. The crushed ore is hoisted to surface in a shaft, unloaded into a bin in the
headframe and then transported by conveyor belts to an intermediate ore storage, which can hold
approximately a week of production.
Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves are the basis for the company’s long-term planning and will
be mined for many years to come. Long-term planning prices, which are an expression of the
anticipated future average prices for metals and currencies, are therefore primarily utilized in the
estimations. The planning prices are used to calculate the NSR (Net Smelter Return), expressed in
SEK/t, in the block models. Boliden currently uses the prices shown in Table 3-7 below.
Based on the long-term prices and recovery from Table 3-7, the following formula is used to calculate
the long-term NSR for Garpenberg:
Zn and Ag are the commodities that contribute the most to the value of Garpenberg, they each
account for about 36% of the total value. The other commodities have relatively lower contribution,
with 16% for Pb, 11% for Au and 1% for Cu.
The variable costs are around 270 SEK/t. These are the direct costs for mining and processing a ton
of ore. Variable costs include for example consumables, transportation and a percentage of spare
parts and energy. This value is used as a guideline in the stope creation process to decide, whether
to include material in a stope or not, assuming there is spare capacity at the mill.
The operational costs are around 500 SEK/t. This cost includes variable costs as defined above, and
additionally fixed costs such as personnel costs and facility maintenance. This value is used as a
guideline for the minimum value of a whole stope.
The breakeven costs are around 610 SEK/t. The breakeven cost for the whole site includes fixed
and variable costs as defined above, and additionally costs for sustaining investments, such as future
strategic mine development and re-purchasing of production machines. Depreciations and capital
investments are not included in the site operational costs. This value is used to make sure that a
larger set of stopes is profitable over a period of time.
The costs distribution is summarized in Table 3-8.
Table 3-8. Different cost categories in Garpenberg from 2022 cost data.
Two different resource estimation methods are used in block models. Ordinary Kriging (OK) is
usually used in areas where there is sufficient drillhole data and Inverse Distance (ID) is usually used
in areas with less available data. Resource estimation is conducted in Datamine or Leapfrog Edge.
Though, there are still some older mineralization models and block models in use that were created
in Propack (add-on to the CAD program MicroStation), however those models contain only a
fraction of reported volumes. Table 3-9 shows block models with estimation methods and software
used as well as block sizes for each of the ore bodies in Garpenberg. The block sizes are selected
from spacing in supporting data, in combination with complexity in ore geometry and scale of mining.
No report is available for older areas included in block model blgar.dm, but their tonnage is relatively
small and consists of only 1.3Mton of inferred resources with reconciliation data confirming the
volumes and grades of adjacent mined volumes. These areas require extensive resampling and
remodeling before they can be included in the LOMP or mineral reserves.
In the end of the resource estimation process, Mineral Resource classification takes place using
several criteria. The quality of informing data is first validated where new data generally is deemed
of a higher quality than historical data. Considering Garpenberg geology, grade continuity and
statistical analyses, a drill pattern of 100 x 100 m is used as a guideline for inferred, 50 x 50 m for
indicated and 25 x 25 m for measured resource. However, Tyskgården-Finnhyttan is an exception
since complex geological conditions demand a denser drilling grid. The final classification depends
on drill pattern in combination of other criteria. The classification process is conducted for every
estimation, where the following characteristics are taken into consideration for each of the
mineralized lenses:
Geological complexity
Quality and quantity of informing data
o Confidence in analytical results
o Confidence in borehole surveying
o Analytical data
o Results of geostatistical analysis, variography, and QKNA
Metallurgical factors or assumptions
Confidence in the block estimates
In resource estimations finished in 2020 or later, an evaluation of Reasonable Prospect of Eventual
Economic Extraction (RPEEE) has been conducted in Deswik Stope Optimizer by applying a cut-
off and simplified mining parameters on an existing block model. This assessment leads to more
realistic mineable tonnage and grades, which results in less adjustments when eventually converting
Mineral Resources into Mineral Reserves. Prior to 2020, RPEEE was evaluated according to cut-off
and minimum mining width.
Each resource is only remodeled or reevaluated on a yearly basis if there is new data available. The
NSR formula and the cut-off used for the reported resources varies between years. A list of the NSR
formulas and cut-off values used are listed in Table 3-10. All reserve and resource tonnes and grades
are interrogated from the eight active block models in Garpenberg listed in Table 3-9 and reported
according to the PERC standard.
Table 3-13 shows the Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves for Garpenberg as per 2023-12-31.
2023 2022
kton Au Ag Cu Zn Pb kton Au Ag Cu Zn Pb
Classification (g/t) (g/t) (% ) (% ) (% ) (g/t) (g/t) (%) (%) (%)
Mineral Reserves
Proved 17 200 0.25 98 0.04 3.0 1.3 18 658 0.24 97 0.04 3.1 1.32
Probable 83 700 0.31 88 0.05 2.5 1.2 90 640 0.30 85 0.04 2.5 1.14
Total 100 900 0.3 90 0.04 2.6 1.2 109 298 0.29 87 0.04 2.6 1.17
Mineral Resourcess
Measured 100 0.24 108 0.03 2.8 1.0 68 0.24 108 0.03 2.8 1.04
Indicated 21 600 0.41 70 0.06 2.7 1.3 21 556 0.41 70 0.06 2.7 1.32
Total M&I 21 600 0.41 70 0.06 2.7 1.3 21 624 0.41 70 0.06 2.7 1.32
Inferred 67 900 0.34 57 0.05 2.3 1.1 67 413 0.34 57 0.05 2.3 1.10
In 2023 the total Mineral Reserves in Garpenberg decreased by 8.4 Mt (million metric tonnes) to
100.9 Mt. Measured and Indicated Resources in Garpenberg remained unchanged at 21.6 Mt. Inferred
Resources slightly increased by 0.5 Mt to 67.9 Mt. Table 3-14 shows the changes in detail, including
changes in metal grades.
Figure 3-11 and Figure 3-12 show the changes in Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources
respectively between 2022-12-31 and 2023-12-31, with the explanation of what caused these changes.
Figure 3-11. Changes to Mineral Reserves between 2022-12-31 (leftmost column) and 2023-12-31 (rightmost column).
The other columns show the causes for reduction (in red) and addition (in green) of tonnage. Note that the scale of the
y-axis has been adjusted and starts at 80 000 kton.
Figure 3-12. Changes to Mineral Resources between 2022-12-31 (leftmost column) and 2023-12-31 (rightmost column).
The other columns show the causes for reduction (in red) and addition (in green) of tonnage. Note that the scale of the
y-axis has been adjusted and starts at 60 000 kton.
Figure 3-13. Changes in resources and reserves in Dammsjön below 900z. The image is a front view of the Dammsjön
ore body, looking North.
In Lappberget, the design of Etage 1250 was also updated following the Whittle optimization. A
different set of cutoffs for main sequence and second sequence as per best result from the
optimization. For the main sequence, a new NSR cut-off of 700 SEK/ton was used, and 470
SEK/ton for second pass (instead of 850 respectively 320 used previously. The result of this cut-off
change was that many of the low-grade stopes in the West were removed from the design.
In the Southern area, positions previously reported as indicated resources have been downgraded to
inferred, due to the estimates not being properly documented and have not been reviewed. However,
reconciliation data confirming the volumes and grades of adjacent mined volumes led to the decision
to keep them in Mineral Resources. This concerns positions LillaStrand855-900 and StoraKanal855-
950.
Mined out tonnage in 2023 totals 3 151 Kton, which is an increase by 108 Kton from previous year.
Metal grades of the mined out tonnage is as follows: 3.3% Zn, 1.4% Pb and 97 ppm Ag. Over 75%
of all mined out ore derived from Lappberget.
Classification kton Au Ag Cu Zn Pb
2023-12-31 (g/t) (g/t) (% ) (% ) (% )
Proved Mineral Reserve 17 249 (-1 410) 0.25 (-) 98 (-) 0.04 (-) 3.0 ( - 0.1) 1.3 (-)
Probable Mineral Reserve 83 702 (-6 938) 0.31 ( + 0.01) 88 (+3) 0.05 (-) 2.5 (+0.1) 1.2 (-)
Total Mineral Reserve 100 933 (-8 365) 0.30 ( + 0.01) 90 (+2) 0.04 (-) 2.6 (-) 1.2 (-)
Measured Mineral Resource 68 (-) 0.24 (-) 108 (-) 0.03 (-) 2.8 (-) 1.0 (-)
Indicated Mineral Resource 21 574 (+18) 0.41 (-) 70 (-) 0.06 (-) 2.7 ( - 0.1) 1.3 (-)
Sum Measured and Indicated 21 642 (+18) 0.41 (-) 70 (-) 0.06 (-) 2.7 ( - 0.1) 1.3 (-)
Inferred Mineral Resource 67 913 (+500) 0.34 (-) 57 (-) 0.05 (-) 2.3 (-) 1.1 (-)
Total Mineral Resource 89 555 (+518) 0.36 (-) 60 (-) 0.05 (-) 2.4 (-) 1.1 (-)
3.15 Reconciliation
In order to confirm the precision of the geological interpretation, modelling, grade interpolation etc.,
actual mining volumes times block model grades are checked against the measured results from the
processing plant. This procedure called reconciliation is carried out every month and presented
quarterly. Monthly estimates vary dramatically depending on the mine’s logistics of stocks in the mine
and on surface. The turnover of the stocks also varies a lot.
The grades of the mined-out ore are calculated from the block model using the tonnage reported as
loaded from the stopes and ore development. The ore can either be transported directly to the plant
or put in stockpiles underground. Above ground, there is an ore storage facility which at the
beginning of 2023 contained 82 Kton of ore. During the year the tonnage fluctuated between 40
Kton and 180 Kton. At the end of the year the storage contained 74 Kton of ore.
For the annual report of Reserves and Resources, the reconciliation is compiled from a weighted
aggregation of the four quarters (rolling 4 quarters). Table 3-15 shows monthly and quarterly results
for 2023 from the mine and the processing plant. The year total is shown on the bottom row. The
official grades for Garpenberg are those of the processing plant.
The rolling 4-quarter graph for zinc, lead and silver is shown below in Figure 3-15. The graph shows
the difference in % in weighted metal grades between processed ore and mined ore and is calculated
with the following equation: (Metal Grade Processing Plant/Metal Grade Block Model)-1. Thus, a
positive number means that the grade is higher in the processing plant than in the block model. The
values for Q 1-4 2023 seen at the rightmost side of the graph are: +0.6% Zn, +2.2% Pb and -3.8%
Ag.
Figure 3-15. Metal grades in processed ore vs metal grades of the mined ore based on the block model, over a ten-
year period.