COURSE DESCRIPTION FOR I Sem
COURSE DESCRIPTION FOR I Sem
COURSE DESCRIPTION FOR I Sem
BOOKS:
Architects’ and Engineers’ Office Practice Guide by Jack R. Lewis (Prentice-Hall, 1978).
Planning for Housing: examines the role and nature of planning through
application to housing development. In this stream the potential and shortcomings of
planning in delivering development will be explored, initially through a wide-ranging
overview of the sector, and subsequently through engagement in a live project;
Sustainability and Design: examines the sustainability of homes themselves and
housing within its broader design / built environment context. The first half of this
stream deals with sustainability in new-build housing, extending to a consideration of
sustainable neighborhoods and cities, linking therefore to the planning for housing core
theme. The second half deals with low energy housing retrofit, recognizing that it is
existing homes and buildings that have the greatest capacity to contribute to future
energy use and carbon reductions;
Development Economics and Project Delivery: concerned in its first part with the
financing and economics of speculative development (as a central plank of housing
delivery), and in the second half with the management of the delivery process.
This chapter examines fundamentally how economic analysis can help us understand how
cities and regions function.
This chapter provides students with knowledge and understanding on city and urban area,
urban development, and urban development planning in Ethiopian context through
discussion on basic principles/concepts, urban characteristics and problems, development
of urban spatial pattern and structure, as well as technical process/procedure of urban
development planning and its practices in Ethiopia.
This is the basic introduction of regional development planning that provides students with
basic understanding and essence of regional development, regional growth theories,
regional development concepts, and regional development cases in Ethiopia.
The chapter discusses some main elements in the planning practices and discourses from
several perspectives.
This course provides basic knowledge, concepts, instruments, techniques, and exercise to
manage land in order to achieve intended goals or solve problems in an intended location,
appropriate time, and at affordable cost.
To better develop the students planning skills they will be directly involved in a live case
study executable project.
COURSE DESCRIPTION FOR DESIGN RESEARCH STUDIO-I
The course intends to create a sense of responsibility to the students regarding the place
where they work.
Architecture encompasses people, place and time in order to create solutions i.e. designs
which are a part of the same. Through this course it is expected that the students will
investigate in depth all parameters of city infrastructure needs so that they will learn how
architects can develop cities. It also intends to deeply en-root in their minds that every
infrastructure or entity designed in an urbanscape is an outcome of specific sets of urban
design entities such as demographics, culture, heritage, by-laws, national & international
standards, development stage of city etc. etc
In this course, students are required to think large scale and holistically, to demonstrate the
capacity to have a systemic understanding of their project parameters, scale and the
intention of their urban investigations. Within these project parameters students are
expected to set out and explore a technological and environmental position including
techniques and materials which impacts upon and form part of their of their design project.
Individual or groups of students are required to explore these issues through design,
resulting in a strategy for intervention which informs a physical and conceptual master
plan and generic design brief. This may form the basis for development at building scale at
individual level.
LEARNING PROCESS:
The studio is divided into three session parts with their own sets of goal attainments.
This part also gives students the opportunity to investigate the social and cultural context
of architecture, view their own design and design-related research in a theoretical context,
and explore and question the relationship between social and cultural theories and
architectural projects and architects’ research.
A series of lectures and seminars explore the function and use of theory in architectural
and design investigations. Through selected readings, lectures and seminar discussions, a
variety of social and cultural perspectives will be considered.
Students are expected to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of competing theories,
their potential for their own work performed in design and research studios, and their
application through the work of others.
This part constitutes the concept stage of the final design project and aims to develop a
design concept for Comprehensive Design Project, through experimentation and
explorative design enquiry.
In parallel with its related technology Awareness, it seeks to establish the ambition, frame
of reference and theoretical area of investigation for the final thesis design. Students have
the opportunity to experiment with methodologies and formulate a personal agenda and
strategy for the programme-long projects including final thesis. Material aspects of design
and construction are addressed on a conceptual and experimental level and placed in an
individual philosophical context, with emphasis on exploitation of synergies within the
group through the exchange of ideas and design skills.
3. Comprehensive Design: Project
This part aims to build upon site and concept investigations performed during design parts
Comprehensive Design: Brief, Context & Critical theory and Comprehensive Design:
Concept. It looks to address technological issues as identified in Technical Awareness, and
forms the basis for Technical Appraisal.
This part intends to also impart following mentioned tool & knowledge enhancement for
the students:
- Describe and explain the formal structure, construction and function of a
work of architecture as a product or response to physical as well as cultural
contexts
- Demonstrate a broader theoretical understanding of relationships between
built form, content, context, concept, and construction, with particular
reference to culture-specific practices, perceptions, beliefs and operations
- Interpret culture-specific practices as generative parameters to creatively
synthesize an architectural project
- Compose an innovative design on the basis of exploration and critical
reflection
- Explore and transpose culture-specific means of representation to develop
and communicate a design project
- Demonstrate an understanding of the architect as an agent of cultural change
OVERVIEW OF LEARNING ACTIVITIES:
1. You will participate in a studio group which you have balloted from a pool of
offerings, each with differentiated themes. You will design theories according to the
themes and agendas of that studio group.
2. A studio group leader will be allocated to each theme.
3. Every studio group will in course of the semester will fulfill various assignments such
as seminars, workshops as well as research proposal in co-ordination and in line
with course coordinator.
4. Also each studio group is responsible for conducting site experimentation when and
where required.
TIME SCHEDULE:
The course is expected to be carried out within a span of 15 weeks leaving the 16th
week for presentations preparation. These 15 weeks are distributed as follows among
the three parts:
PART 1: Week 1 up to Week 6
PART 2: Week 7 up to Week 9
PART 3: Week 10 up to Week 15
ASSESSMENTS:
- Active studio participation will be one the pre-requisite to be qualified for
completion of the course.
- Evaluations will be distributed through various stages of the studios.
- Every studio part will be pre-requisite for the next part.
- Each of the three part of the studio will be a complete 100% evaluation.
- The final weightage of each part in the final grade will be:
PART 1 30%
PART 2 20%
PART 3 50%
- But without successfully defending the final part design project all earlier
evaluations will be deemed invalid.