LETTER

DA – 2
URGENT
NDOH:24.03.2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

(Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction)
No................. Orgl./D-II/DHC...........................
From:
The Registrar General

Delhi High Court
New Delhi.
To
SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER(SDO)

CHANCHAL, MALDA, WEST BENGAL,
PH:03513-252872(O), 03513-253306(R)
FAX:03513-253308.
EMAIL:[email protected]
In CS(OS)No. 163/2006
Smt. Gunja Mondal & Ors. ...Plaintiff/s
VERSUS
Sh. Bhushan Uppal & Ors. …Defendant/s
Sub: For compliance of orders dated 30.03.2016, 11.07.2016, 27.09.2016 &
29.11.2016 passed by Worthy Registrar General of this Court in Suit no.
163/2006.
Madam /Sir,
This is in continuation of the letter nos.
5788/I/Orgl/DA-II/DHC/04.05.2016,
9591/I/Orgl./DA-II/DHC/21.07.2016 &
17564/I/Orgl./DA-II/DHC/15.11.2016. wherein the undersigned was
directed to request you to send correct Bank details of Mr. Chhattu
Chowdhury with their Bank IFSC Codes. But till date no report has
been received.
It is once again requested to comply with the orders/directions
issued by Worthy Registrar General of this Court vide orders dated
30.03.2016, 11.07.2016, 27.09.2016 & 29.11.2016(copies enclosed)
passed in the said Suit and send correct Bank details of Mr. Chhattu
Chowdhury with his Bank IFSC Codes, well before the next date of
hearing viz. 24.03.2017.
Thanking you.
Yours sincerely
Deputy Registrar (O)

for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Enclosed: 1. Copies of orders dated 30.03.2016, 11.07.2016 & 27.09.2016 passed by
Sh. Vinod Goel, Worthy Registrar General of this Court.
2. A copy of memo of parties.
DA – 2
ORDINARY POST
NDOH:16.09.2016
No................................................Orgl./DAII/
DHC...........................
From:
Delhi High Court
New Delhi.
To
DISTRICT JUDGE (NEW DELHI DISTT.),
PATIALA HOUSE COURTS,
NEW DELHI
In CS(OS)No. 2728/2014
BALRAJ TAHIM & ANR. ...Plaintiff/s
VERSUS
KAUSHALYA TAHIM & ORS. …Defendant/s
Sub: Transferred back of CS(OS) No. 980/2013.
Madam /Sir,
With reference to the order dated 27.07.2016(copy enclosed)
passed by Hon’ble Ms. Justice Hima Kohli of this Court. Wherein I am
directed to request you to transfer back the file of CS(OS) No.
980/2013 titled “Bajraj Tahim & Anr. Vs. Kaushalya Tahim &
Ors.” to this Court. Captioned suit was listed before the learned ADJ,
Patiala House Courts on 10.08.2016.
Thanking you.
Yours sincerely
Assitant Registrar (O)

for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Enclosed: 1. Copy of order dated 27.07.2016 passed by Hon’ble Ms.
Justice
Hima Kohli of this Court
DA – 2
ORDINARY POST
NDOH:16.09.2016
No................................................Orgl./DAII/
DHC...........................
From:
Delhi High Court
New Delhi.
To
SH. SANJAY KUMAR, ADJ,

WEST DISTRICT, TIS HAZARI COURTS,
DELHI.
In CS(OS)No. 2359/2015 & TR.P.(C) 21/2015

MRS. RENU MEHTA & ORS. ...Plaintiff/s
VERSUS
MRS. MADHU PURI & ORS. …Defendant/s
Sub: Transfer of Probate Case no. 20/2015.
Madam /Sir,
I am directed to refer this Court order dated 03.08.2016(copy
enclosed) passed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, and to
request you to transfer the files of Probate Case no. 20/2015 titled
“Pardeep Dham Vs. State & Ors.” to this Court.
Thanking you.
Yours sincerely
Administrative
Officer (J)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Enclosed: 1. Copy of order dated 03.08.2016 passed by Hon’ble Mr.
Justice
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw of this Court
DA – 2
ORDINARY POST

No................................................Orgl./DAII/
DHC...........................
From:
The Registrar (Original)
Delhi High Court
New Delhi.
To
SH. N. K. MISHRA,
Minister (PERS & CA)
Embassy of India
2107 Massachusetts Ave. NW. Washington, DC 20008
Email: [email protected]
CS(OS) 2558/2013
3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES
COMPANY & ANR. ...Plaintiff/s
VERSUS
M/S. VENUS SAFETY & HEALTH
PVT. LTD. & ANR. …
Defendant/s
Sub: Acknowledgement of receipt of Envelope.

Sir,
With reference to your letter No. WAS/PERS/815/46/2016
Dated 26.07.2016, I hereby acknowledge the receipt of an envelope
from the Embassy of India, 2107 Massachusetts AV, NW, Washington
DC 2008 through the Ministry of External Affairs, South Block, New
Delhi. Which contained three sets of colour DVDs, each colour set
containing 3 DVDs (i.e.Nine in all) regarding Video Conferencing in
CS(OS) No. 2558/2013 and the Signed/Attested statement of the
Video Conferencing held at Embassy of India, Washington D.C. on
July 18-19, 2016.
Thanking you.
Yours sincerely
Shri V. K.
Kochhar
Registrar(Original)
Delhi High Court,
NewDelhi
CS(OS) No. 330/2016
Reference order dated 10.03.2017passed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice
R. K. Gauba in CS(OS) No. 330/2016.
Vide orders dated 21.10.2016 the Hon’ble Court has directed the
Registrar(Original) to take the requisite steps to send the document i.e.
Memorandum of understanding dated 15th June, 2013 to the Collector of
Stamps for determination of the stamp duty and penalty payable by the
plaintiff on the same under the law as the said document purports to
have been executed without any stamp duty being paid.
A letter was sent to the Collector of Stamps alongwith the certified

copy of Memorandum of understanding dated 15 th June, 2013 for taking
necessary action and file compliance report in this regard.
But till date no report has been received from The Collector of
Stamps, 5 Shamnath Marg, New Delhi. Hence vide order dated
10.03.2017
Submitted.
AO(J)
DA – 2
NDH: 10.03.2017
(Thorugh Special Messenger)

No................................................Orgl./DAII/
DHC...........................
From:
Delhi High Court
New Delhi.
To
COLLECTOR OF STAMPS
5, SHAMNATH MARG,
NEW DELHI
CS(OS) 330/2016
SHRI DEVENDER KUMAR ...Plaintiff
VERSUS
SHRI BRIJESH & ANR. …
Defendants
Sub: Determination of the stamp duty and penalty payable.

Sir,
I am directed to refer to this Court’s order dated 21.10.2016
passed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. K. Gauba in the abovesaid matter
and to send you the certified copy of document i.e. Memorandum of
Understanding dated 15th June, 2013 for determination of the stamp
duty and penalty payable by the Plaintiff on the same under the law
as the said document purports to have been executed without any
stamp duty being paid.
The compliance report in this regard be sent to this Court well
before the next date of hearing i.e. 10th March, 2017.
(V. K. Kochhar)
Registrar(Original)
Delhi High Court,
NewDelhi
Encl:
1. Copy of order dated 21.10.2016 passed by HMJ R. K. Gauba

2. Copy of Memo of parties
3. Certified copy of Memorandum of Understanding Dt.15th June, 2013
(Through Special Messenger)
Most Urgent
NDH: 02.03.2017
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
D-2
No._____________________ Orgl.II/DHC/DII/Dated _______________
From
The Registrar General,
Delhi High Court,
New Delhi
To,
The Registrar(Judicial)
Supreme Court of India
New Delhi
Sub: Status report in respect of Civil Appeal No. 5875/2016 titled as “L.K.
Kaul (Dead) Through LRs vs.. Pradeep Kumar Khanna (HUF) Thr. LRs & Anr.”
required in CS(OS) 1221/2005 titled as “Mr. L. K. Kaul vs. Sh. Pradeep Kumar
Khanna (HUF) & Ors.”.
Madam/Sir,
I am directed to forward herewith a copy of order dated

01.12.2016 passed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. K. Gauba of this Court
with the request to provide following information:
1. Whether if any review petition was filed before the Supreme Court
in Civil Appeal No. 5875/2016 and if so, the status thereof.
2. Whether the costs in terms of the order dated 05.07.2016 of the
Supreme Court passed in Civil Appeal No. 5875/2016 were
deposited in the Court?
You are therefore requested to provide the abovementioned

information to this Court well before the next date of hearing i.e. 02 nd
March, 2017 to enable the Registry to place the same before Hon’ble
Court.
.
Yours faithfully,
Deputy
Registrar(O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl; 1. Copy of order dated 01.12.2016 passed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. K.
Gauba
of this Court.
2. Memo of Parties.
3. Copy of orders dated 05.07.2016 & 29.08.2016 passed in Civil Appeal
No.
5875/2014 of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
D2
HIGH COURT OF DELHI, NEW DELHI
No................................................
Date ……………………………………
From:
Delhi High Court
New Delhi.
To
Dr. V P Sharma
JG – 27A, Khirki Extn.,
Malviya Nagar,
New Delhi – 110017
(m)9311046106
Sub: CS(OS) No. 290/2007.
Dr. V. P. Sharma Plaintiff
Versus
Dr. Poonam Sharma Defendant
Sir,
I am directed to refer to your letter dated 02.02.2017 and to
inform you that the aforesaid case was transferred to the Ld. District
Judge, Chandigarh vide letter no.
1242/I/Orgl./DA-II/DHC/27.01.2016 through speed post bearing no.
ED961095165IN (copy enclosed).
Yours
truely
Administrative Officer
(Judl.)(Org.)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl. Copy of letter sending case files to the Court of Ld. District Judge,
Chandigarh.
DA – 2 (Reminder)
(Thorugh Special Messenger) NDH: 19.05.2017
(MOST URGENT)

No................................................Orgl./DAII/
DHC...........................
From:
Delhi High Court
New Delhi.
To
COLLECTOR OF STAMPS
5, SHAMNATH MARG,
NEW DELHI
CS(OS) 330/2016
SHRI DEVENDER KUMAR ...Plaintiff

VERSUS
SHRI BRIJESH & ANR. …
Defendants

Sir,
This is in continuation of this Court’s letter No.

16040/I/Orgl/DAII/DHC dated 25.10.2016, forwarding therewith a copy of
order dated 21.10.2016 passed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. K. Gauba in the
abovesaid matter and to send you the certified copy of document i.e.
Memorandum of Understanding dated 15th June, 2013 for determination of
the stamp duty and penalty payable by the Plaintiff on the same under the
law as the said document purports to have been executed without any
stamp duty being paid. The compliance report in this regard was to be filed
in this Court well before 10 th March, 2017. But till date no report has yet
been received from your end.
The Hon’ble Court vide its order dated 10.03.2017 has directed the
undersigned to pursue the matter with your goodself in order to secure an
early intimation in terms of order dated 21.10.2016 so that the same is
placed before the Hon’ble Court well before the next date of hearing i.e.
19.05.2017.
You are, therefore, once again requested to send the compliance
report in terms of order dated 21.10.2016 of the Hon’ble Court.
(V. K. Kochhar)
Registrar(Original)
Delhi High Court,
NewDelhi
1. Copy of orders dated 21.10.2016 & 10.03.2017 passed by HMJ R. K.

Gauba.
3. Certified copy of Memorandum of Understanding Dt.15th June, 2013
CS(OS) No. 330/2016
Vide order dated 21.10.2016, a letter to The Collector of Stamps, 5
Shamnath Marg, New Delhi was sent on 25.10.2016, But till date no
report has been received from The Collector of Stamps.
Vide order dated 10.03.2017, the Hon’ble Court had directed the
Registrar(Original) to take the requisite steps to call the report from The
Collector of Stamps, 5 Shamnath Marg, New Delhi.
In view of above, if approved, a reminder in this regard may be

sent to The Collector of Stamps sending compliance report well before
the next date of hearing i.e. 19.05.2017.
Submitted.
AO(J)
DA – 2
Ordinary post
No................................................Orgl./D -II/DHC...........................
From:
Delhi High Court
New Delhi.
To
The Collector,
Chief Revenue Controlling Authority,
5, Shamnath Marg, Delhi.
CS(OS)No. 188/2013
Shri Bishan Singh Bhatt ...Plaintiff/s

VERSUS
Smt. Chhalgam Devi & Anr. …Defendant/s
Sub: Clarification of name after report of S.H.O. P.S. Shakarpur, Delhi Regarding
the name of Plaintiff i.e. Shri Bishan Singh Bhati @ Shri Bishan Singh Bhatt.
Madam /Sir,
This is in continuation of the Court Fee Refund Certificate sent to you vide
this Court letter No. 19922/I/DHC/Orgl.-II dated 04.09.2013, wherein it was
directed to refund the Court fee of Rs.1,56,500/- in favour of Plaintiff (namely Shri
Bishan Singh Bhatt) but amount of the Court fee couldn’t get released in favour of
the Plaintiff as the Identity proof of Plaintiff was showing his name as Bishan Singh
Bhati instead of Bishan Singh Bhatt.
As ordered by Hon’ble Court on 09.09.2014 The SHO of P.S. Shakarpur,

Delhi was directed to make an enquiry as to whether Shri Bishan Singh Bhatt and
Shri Bishan Singh Bhati are same persons or not.
Now as per the report of the SHO of P.S. Shakarpur, Delhi declaring therein
that Shri Bishan Singh Bhatt and Shri Bishan Singh Bhati is the same person.
I am therefore directed to inform you to take the necessary action at

your end.
Thanking you.
Yours sincerely
Administrative
Officer(J)Org.
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Copy to: (I) M/s. Vinod Sharma & Associates, Chamber no. D-721, Lawyers’Chamber
Block,
Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.
(II) Shri Bishan Singh Bhati @ Shri Bishan Singh Bhatt, S/o. Late Shri
Khacheru Singh,
Resident of H. No. S-110, Sunder Block, Shakarpur, Delhi - 110092.
Encl: 1. Copy of orders dated 31.05.2013 & 09.09.2014 passed by Hon’ble Mr.
Justice
Manmohan and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher of this Court.
3. Copy of cover letter sent to the Counsel for the Plaintiff (for necessary
assistance)
4. Copy of report of S.H.O., P.S. Shakarpur, Delhi..

CS(OS) No. 188/2013
(DA2)
Kindly see the orders dated 31.05.2013 & 09.09.2014 passed by

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manmohan and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv
Shakdher respectively of this Court.
It is submitted that a Court Fee Refund Certificate was issued

vide this Court letter no. 19922/I/DHC/Orgl. II dated 04.09.2013 in
favour of Plaintiff(namely Shri Bishan Singh Bhatt@ Shri Bishan Singh
Bhati) and sent to The Collector, Chief Revenue Controlling Authority, 5,
Shamnath Marg, Delhi. But the amount of the Court Fee couldn’t get
released by the Plaintiff as the Identity proof of the Plaintiff was showing
his name as Bishan Singh Bhati instead of Bishan Singh Bhatt(as
mentioned in Memo of parties)
Vide order dated 09.09.2014 the Hon’ble Court directed to the

SHO, P. S. Shakarpur, Delhi to make an enquiry as to whether Shri
Bishan Singh Bhatt and Shri Bishan Singh Bhati are same persons or
not.
The report of the SHO of P. S. Shakarpur, Delhi has been received

and the same is declaring therein that Shri Bishan Singh Bhatt and
Shri Bishan Singh Bhati are same person.
In view of above, if approved, a letter in this regard may be sent

to The Collector, Chief Revenue Controlling Authority, 5, Shamnath
Marg, Delhi to take necessary action in this regard.
Submitted.
AO(J)
DA – 2
URGENT

No................................................Orgl./D
-II/DHC...........................
From:
Delhi High Court
New Delhi.
To
SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER(SDO)

CHANCHAL, MALDA,
WEST BENGAL, INDIA
In CS(OS)No. 163/2006
Smt. Gunja Mondal & Ors. ...Plaintiff/s
VERSUS
Sh. Bhushan Uppal & Ors. …Defendant/s
Sub: For compliance of orders dated 30.03.2016, 11.07.2016, 27.09.2016 &
29.11.2016 passed by Worthy Registrar General of this Court in Suit no.
163/2006.
Madam /Sir,
This is in reference to your letter no. 364/DHC/SDO/CHL dated
24.08.2016(copy enclosed). wherein you have given the bank details
of Mr. Chhattu Chowdhury as asked by this Hon’ble Court vide
order dated 30.03.2016 & 11.07.2016.
As informed by the Cash Branch of this Court, it is submitted
that the abovementioned Bank details of Mr. Chhattu Chowdhury is
not correct.
So it is once again requested to provide the correct Bank details
of Mr. Chhattu Chowdhury at the earliest.
Thanking you.
Yours sincerely
Deputy Registrar (O)

for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Enclosed: 1. Copies of orders dated 30.03.2016, 11.07.2016 & 27.09.2016 passed by
Sh. Vinod Goel, Worthy Registrar General of this Court.
(ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)
No………………………………………….Dated…………………………………
….
IN THE MATTER OF CS(OS) No. 647/2006
Smt. Kusum Kumria & Ors. Plaintiff/s

Versus
M/s. Pharma Ventures India (P) Ltd. & Anr.
Defendant/s
CERTIFICATE OF SALE
(ORDER XXI RULE 94 C.P.C.)
This is to certify that Smt. Sarawjeet Singh, W/o. Shri M. Jha,
R/o. W-152, Greater Kailash Part – I, New Delhi (Defendant No. 2
in the present case) has been declared the purchaser of the property
bearing no. W-152, Greaer Kailash Part – I, New Delhi – 110048,
(except its First Floor), at a sale consideration of Rs.10.65
Crores(Rupees Ten Crores Sixty Five Lakh Only) by Court Auction
accepted on 28th October, 2013 in this case and the said sale has
been duly confirmed by this Court vide order dated 15.05.2014
passed in the case. As the defendant No. 2 has 50% undivided
share in the aforesaid auctioned property, she has paid a sum of
Rs.5,32,50,000/- (Rupees Five Crores Thirty Two Lakh Fifty
Thousand Only) being 50% share of the auction amount.
Given under my hand and the seal of this Court in terms of
orders dated 28th October 2013, 15th May2014 & 05.07.2017.
REGISTRAR (ORIGINAL)
DELHI HIGH COURT
NEW DELHI.
DA – 2
NDH: 26.09.2017

No................................................Orgl./DAII/
DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
THE COLLECTOR OF STAMPS

5, SHAMNATH MARG,
NEW DELHI
SUB: CS(COMM) No. 1006/2016

Mrs. Ritu Chadha ...Plaintiff
VERSUS
Sh. Ajeet Singh Sachdev & Ors. …
Defendants

Sir,
I am directed to forward herewith for information and necessary
compliance a copy of orders dated 06.07.2017 & 20.07.2017 passed
by Sh. Ajay Kumar Kuhar and Sh. Raj Kumar Tripathi, Joint
Registrars (Judicial) of this Court Accordingly, the original document
i.e. Rent Deed executed between Manpreet Kaur and M/s. Magazine
Export dated 18.03.2005 is being send herewith for the purpose of
assessing of stamp duty on this document and penalty, if any.
Kindly acknowledge the receipt.
Yours faithfully
Administrative
Officer(J)(O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl:
1. Copy of orders dated 06.07.2017 & 20.07.2017 passed by Worthy Joint

Registrars (Judicial) of this Court
3. Original Rent Deed dated 18.03.2005 between Ms. Manpreet Kaur and
M/s. Magazine Exports from Page no. 95 to 101(Total 7 pages).
DA – 2
(Ordinary)

No................................................Orgl./DAII/
DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mr. V. L. Madan, Advocate.

[Counsel for the Plaintiff in CS(OS) No. 1279/2005]
B6/81 (LGF), Safdarjung Enclave,
New Delhi – 110029
(m)9810017362, 9311017362.
SUB: CS(OS) No. 1279/2005

Smt. Usha Kapur ...Plaintiff
VERSUS
Smt. Kavita Kapur & Ors. …
Defendants
Sub: Regarding Refund of Court Fee Certificate in CS(OS) No.

1279/2005.
Sir,
I am directed to refer to your letter received in this office vide
diary no. 17538, dated 12.07.2017, wherein you have stated that you
got no information regarding the voucher of Court Fee Refund
Certificate issued in CS(OS) No. 1279/2005 by this Hon’ble Court.
As per our record, a Court Fee Refund Certificate for
Rs.33,150/- has already been sent to the Office of Collector of Stamp
at 5, Shamnath Marg, New Delhi vide our letter no. 7631/I/Org/DHC,
dated 25.05.2011.
You are therefore, requested to contact the office of Collector of
Stamp for refund of Court Fee.
Yours faithfully
Administrative
Officer(J)(O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
DA – 2

No................................................Orgl./DAII/
DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
DIRECTOR,
CENTRAL FORENSIC SCIENCE LABORATORY (CFSL),
CGO COMPLEX,
LODHI ROAD,
NEW DELHI,
SUB: CS(OS) No. 3338/2015

M/s. Saigon Infratech (P) Limited ...Plaintiff
VERSUS
Dinesh Dhiman …
Defendant
Sir,
I am directed to forward herewith for information and
necessary compliance, a copy of order dated 23.11.2017 (copy
enclosed) passed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Manmohan of this Court. In
view of order dated 23.11.2017, two Nos. of sealed documents
containing the Agreement to Sell and Purchase dated 07.03.2015
and the original signatures of defendant are being sent herewith for
examination.
You are, therefore, requested to submit the report to this
Court after examining the said documents well before the next date
of hearing i.e. 28.02.2018.
Yours faithfully
(J) (O)
For REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl:
1. Copy of orders dated 13.09.2017 & 23.11.2017

2. 2 nos. of sealed documents i.e. containing the Agreement to Sell and Purchase dated
07.03.2015 and the original signatures of defendant (In Original)
3. Memo of parties.
CS(OS) No. 497/2004 (DA2)
Reference noting dated 19.07.2018 of Joint Registrar-cumm-Secretary to HACJ

forwarding therewith a letter (PUC) of Sh. J. S. Malik, C-4/49, Safdarjung
Development Area, New Delhi received in this Court vide diary no. CJS-1939 dated
17.07.2018, wherein it is mentioned that plaintiff is using all the tactics for delaying
the matter thus it is requested to hear the above said matter expeditiously, preferably
on a day to day basis.
It is pertinent to mention here that Sh. J. S. Malik is Defendant in the above

said suit.
In this connection, kind attention is invited to Rule 1, Chapter 1, Part A(a) of

Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V which is reproduced as under:
“1. To be deposited in petition box during Court hours – All

ordinary appeals, petitions and applications for review or
revision, written statements, affidavits or other documents sought
to be presented to the Court, shall be presented by litigants or
their Advocates by depositing them in the petition box of the Court
outside the room of the Deputy Registrar (now on the filing
counter on the ground floor of new Delhi High Court building)
between the hours of 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on every day which is not
a Court holiday. Petitions, written statements, affidavits or other
documents sought to be presented to the Court, sent by litigants
through post for taking some judicial action shall not be
entertained by this Court but returned per bearing post.”
In view of the aforesaid Rule, case is submitted for consideration and orders
whether the PUC in original may be returned to the addressee with the request to file
the same at the Filing Counter (Original side) of this Court between 10.00AM to
4.00PM on working days in accordance with High Court Rules.
DFA is added for approval and issue.
AO(J)
DA – 2
(Ordinary)

No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
To
Deputy Registrar,
RFA Branch, Delhi High Court,
New Delhi.
SUB: Report regarding the amount deposited in

CS(OS) No. 113/2006 in this Hon’ble Court.
In compliance of the order dated 11.07.2018 passed in RFA 9/2018, I

hereby forward and inform that there was only one FDR 15530310503720 for
Rs.1,00,00,000/- lying deposited in CS(OS) 113/2006.
CS(OS) No. 113/2006 stood transferred to South-East District, Saket
Courts, New Delhi pursuant to order dated 16.12.2015 and the said FDR has been
handed over to the official of Saket Courts namely Ms. Harvinder Kaur, Employee
Code. 12540 on 04.03.2017 (copy of the receiving is attached herewith).
Further, there is no other FDR lying in this case in the Original Branch.
Yours faithfully
Deputy
Registrar (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
rk
Encl: As above.
CS(OS) No. 497/2004.
(DA2)
PUC is a letter dated 04.09.2018 received in this Court on 06.09.2018 vide

diary no. 22968 from Sh. J. S. Malik, C-4/49, Safdarjung Development Area,
New Delhi.
Vide PUC Sh. J. S. Malik (74 years old) has stated that he is defendant in
the above said suit and this is his second letter to this Hon’ble Court. It is
pertinent to mentioned here that Sh. J. S. Malik filed his first letter on
16.07.2018, which was returned to him (in original) with cover letter no. 9778-
I/Orgl./DAII/DHC dated 30.07.2018 (at flag ‘A’) referring therein Rule 1, Part
A(A), Chapter 1, Vol. V, Delhi High Court Rules & Orders, under the order of
Worthy Registrar (Original) (at flag ‘B’).
Rule 1, Part A(A), Chapter 1, Vol. V, Delhi High Court Rules & Orders
which states as under:
“1. To be deposited in petition box during Court hours –

All ordinary appeals, petitions and applications for review
or revision, written statements, affidavits or other
documents sought to be presented to the Court, shall be
presented by litigants or their Advocates by depositing them
in the petition box of the Court outside the room of the
Deputy Registrar (now on the filing counter on the ground
floor of new Delhi High Court building) between the hours
of 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on every day which is not a Court
holiday. Petitions, written statements, affidavits or other
documents sought to be presented to the Court, sent by
litigants through post for taking some judicial action shall
not be entertained by this Court but returned per bearing
post.”
In his present letter Sh. J. S. Malik (defendant) has further stated that:
(Para 4)
“ My letter is neither a petition nor other document sought

to be presented in Court. It is just an attempt to draw the
attention of the Hon’ble Chief Justice to the extraordinary
delay…..............caused by the plaintiff and his team.”
In view of above, case is submitted for consideration and orders as to whether:

1. The letter in question may be returned back to Sh. J. S. Malik with the
request to file appropriate application regarding his grievance at the
filing counter of this Court between 10.00AM to 4.00PM on all
working days.
Or
2. The matter may be placed before Hon’ble Court for consideration on

said letter.
Submitted.
AO(J)
DA – 2 (DFA)
(Ordinary)
No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Sh. J. S. Malik,
C-4/49, Safdarjung Development Area,
New Delhi.
SUB: CS(OS) No. 497/2004.
Ravi Arora ...Plaintiff
Vs.
J. S. Malik …Defendants
Sir,
I am directed to refer to your letter dated 04.09.2018 received in this Court vide diary
no. 22968 on 06.09.2018 addressed to the Registrar General of High Court of Delhi and to
inform you that as per Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule
1, applications/documents sent by the litigants through post for taking some judicial action
shall be not be entertained by this Court as such the same are returned herewith (in original
along with their enclosures). It is further informed that litigants or their duly
appointed/authorized Advocate(s) can file application/documents sought to be presented
before Court at the Filing Counter of this Court between 10.00AM to 04.00PM on all
working days.
Yours faithfully
(J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl:
1. Copy of Rule 1 of Chapter 1 of Delhi High Court Rules.
2. Your letters received vide diary no.22968 on 06.09.2018.
DA – 2
(Ordinary)
No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mr. Manish Aggarwal, Advocate,

(Counsel for the Defendant no. 2)
M. Aggarwal & Associates
326, Lawyer’s Chamber Block-I,
Delhi High Court,
New Delhi-110003.
(m) 9818667955.
SUB: CS(OS) No. 2046/2006.
Daljit Singh And Another ...Plaintiffs
Vs.
Hari Steel & General Industries Ltd. And Ors. …
Defendants
Sir,
no. 33271 on 22.12.2018 and to inform you that the copy of the cheque no. 000055, dated
14.11.2018, amounting to Rs.50,35,50,000/- is not lying with the Registry of this Court as
the same has been sent by the Cash Branch of this Court to UCO Bank, Delhi High Court,
New Delhi for converting the same into FDR.
Yours faithfully
(J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Ordinary
DA – 2

No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mrs. Bulbul Tewari,

167, Jor Bagh,
New Delhi-110003.
(m)9818652495.
SUB: CS(OS) 2103/2007.
M/s. Chaitanya Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Plaintiff
Vs.
Shri Lalit Mohan Tewari & Ors. Defendants
Madam,
With reference to your application dated 14.04.2019, I am directed to inform

you that as per Rule 1, Part A(a), Chapter 1, Volume V, Delhi High Court Rules &
Orders (copy enclosed), applications/documents sent by the litigant through post for
taking some judicial action are not entertained by this Court, and the same are
returned in original alongwith with their enclosures. It is further directed to inform
you that the captioned suit has already been listed in the Final category of cause list
at Serial no. 3 under the heading of “Senior Citizens”.
It is further informed that litigants or their duly appointed/authorized
Advocate(s) can file applications/ documents sought to be presented before Court at
the Filing Counter (Original side) of this Court between 10.00A.M. to 04.00P.M. on all
working days.
Yours faithfully
Administrative Officer (J)

(O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl: As above.
CS(OS) No. 497/2004 “Ravi Arora Vs. J. S. Malik”.
(DA2)
PUC is an application dated 12.04.2019 received in this Hon’ble Court vide

diary no. CJS-0985 dated 15.04.2019 from Sh. J. S. Malik, C-4/49, Safdarjung
Development Area, New Delhi, wherein it is mentioned that plaintiff is using all the
tactics for delaying the matter thus it is requested to hear the above said matter
expeditiously, preferably on a day to day basis.
It is pertinent to mention here that Sh. J. S. Malik is Defendant in the above

said suit and once before also he filed the same kind of application dated
16.07.2018 received in this Hon’ble Court vide diary no. CJS-1939 dated 17.07.2018
(through post) which was returned to him with the request to file the same in
accordance with Rule 1, Chapter 1, Part A(a) of Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol.
V. However, vide present PUC he has submitted that despite sincere efforts made
by him he could not find a petition box outside the room of Deputy Registrar.
Therefore, the applicant has deposited the PUC in the complaint drop box situated
outside the Chief Justice Secretariat.

Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V which is reproduced as under:

All ordinary appeals, petitions and applications for review or
revision, written statements, affidavits or other documents
sought to be presented to the Court, shall be presented by
litigants or their Advocates by depositing them in the petition
box of the Court outside the room of the Deputy Registrar
[now on the filing counter (original side) on the ground
floor of new Delhi High Court building] between the hours
of 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on every day which is not a Court holiday.
Petitions, written statements, affidavits or other documents
sought to be presented to the Court, sent by litigants through
post for taking some judicial action shall not be entertained by
this Court but returned per bearing post.”
whether the PUC in original may be returned to the addressee, with the request to
file the same at Filing counter (Original side) between 10.00AM to 4.00PM on
working day in accordance with the High Court Rules.
AO(J)
DA – 2
(Ordinary)
No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Sh. J. S. Malik,
New Delhi.
SUB: CS(OS) No. 497/2004.

Vs.
J. S. Malik …
Defendants
Sir,
no. CJS-0985 dated 15.04.2019 addressed to the Hon’ble Chief Justice of High Court of
Delhi and to inform you that as per Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part
A(a), Rule 1, applications/documents sent by the litigants through post for taking some
judicial action shall not be entertained by this Court as such the same are returned herewith
(in original along with their enclosures). It is further informed that litigants or their duly
working days.
Yours faithfully

(O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl:
2. Your letters received vide diary no.CJS-0985 dated 15.04.2019.
CS(OS) 2103/2007 DA2
“Mrs. Chetanya Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shri Lalit Mohan Tewari &
Ors.”.
PUC is a letter received through speed post no.
ED240260477IN from Mrs. Bulbul Tewari [Defendant no. 3(a)]) in the
captioned suit, wherein she has requested for the quick disposal of
the matter as the matter is 12 years old.
Rule 1, Part A(A), Chapter 1, Vol. V, Delhi High Court Rules & Orders
which states as under:
“All ordinary appeals, petitions and

applications for review or revision, written
statements, affidavits or other documents
sought to be presented to the Court, shall be
presented by litigants or their Advocates by
depositing………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………….on the filing
counter (Original side) on the ground floor of
new Delhi High Court building) between the
hours of 10a.m. to 4p.m. on every day which is
not a Court holiday. Petitions, written
statements, affidavits or other documents
sought to be presented to the Court, sent by
litigants through post for taking some judicial
action shall not be entertained by this Court
but returned per bearing post.”
It is submitted that
In view of above, if agreed, the said letter in original may be

returned to the addressee, she may be apprised of the relevant rule
cited above and she may further be informed that the said matter is
already listed in the Final category of cause list at Serial no. 3 under
the heading of “Senior citizens”.
Draft of forwarding letter in anticipation is added for approval.
AOJ(O)
CS(OS) 1335/2005 “Samira Kohli Vs. Soumitra Kohli & Ors.”.
PUC is a complaint letter dated Nil received in this Court

through Speed post no. ED197697678IN from Sh. Ashok Gupta
@ Newsman of India C/o. 805/1998, H/O-Baapu NGO Bureau,
WZ-0007, Basai Darapur, New Delhi-110015 forwarded to the
Dealing assistant vide diary no. CJS-1055 dated 24.04.2019,
wherein the complainant has mentioned that his complaint is
not properly entertained by the trial court (South-East District,
Saket court).
It is pertinent to mentioned here that the captioned suit
was transferred to the District & Sessions Judge, South-East
District, Saket Courts, New Delhi vide order dated 30.11.2015
(copy enclosed) by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Valmiki J. Mehta due to
change in the pecuniary jurisdiction.
In view of above, if agreed, the said complaint letter in
original may be sent to the District & Sessions Judge, South-
East District, Saket Court, New Delhi for further necessary
action.
DFA of forwarding letter is attached herewith for
approval and issue.
AOJ(O)
DFA
No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
The Ld. District & Sessions Judge,

South-East District, Saket Courts,
New Delhi.
SUB: CS(OS) No. 1335/2005.
Samira Kohli
...Plaintiff
Vs.
Soumitra Kohli & Ors. …
Defendants
Sir/Madam,
I am directed to forward herewith a complaint letter in original

received in this Hon’ble Court vide diary no. CJS-1055 dated 24.04.2019 for
doing the needful as the matter has already been transferred to your court
vide order dated 30.11.2015 (copy enclosed).
Yours faithfully
(J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl:
1. Copy of order dated 30.11.2015 passed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice
Valmiki J. Mehta.
2. Complaint letter in original received in this Court vide diary no.
CJS-1055 dated 24.04.2019.
CS(OS) No. 497/2004 “Ravi Arora Vs. J. S. Malik”.
(DA2)
PUC is an application dated 09.05.2019 received in this Hon’ble Court vide

diary no. CJS-1228 dated 13.05.2019 from Sh. J. S. Malik, C-4/49, Safdarjung
Development Area, New Delhi, who is a defendant in the aforesaid case wherein, he
has mentioned the inconvenience being caused to litigants because of the rather
obtuse manner of listing of matters in the category of ‘Final’. It is further mentioned
that the captioned suit is 14 years old and the said defendant lives in constant fear
of being out of town at the time of hearing of matter in Hon’ble Court.
It is pertinent to mention here that Sh. J. S. Malik has twice before also filed
the applications, wherein he requested to list the matter on day to day basis which
were returned to him enclosing therewith the copy of Rule 1, Chapter 1, Part A(a) of
Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V.

Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V, which is reproduced as under:

whether the PUC in original may be returned to the addressee, with the request to
AO(Judl.)(O)
DA – 2
(Ordinary)
No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Sh. J. S. Malik,
New Delhi.
SUB: CS(OS) No. 497/2004.
Vs.
J. S. Malik …
Defendants
Sir,
I am directed to refer to your application dated 09.05.2019 received in

this Court vide diary no. CJS-1228 dated 13.05.2019 addressed to the Hon’ble
Chief Justice of High Court of Delhi and to inform you that as per Delhi High
Court Rules & Orders Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1,
applications/documents sought to be presented to the Court for taking some
judicial action shall be presented by litigants or their advocates at the Filing
Counter of this Court between 10.00AM to 04.00PM on all working days.
Yours faithfully
(J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl:
2. Your application in original received vide diary no.CJS-1228 dated
13.05.2019.
CS(OS) No. 572/2017
DA2/DA3
“Sanjeev Solanki Vs. Union of India & Ors.”
& CS(OS) No. 350/2017
“Pradeep Solanki Vs. Union of India & Ors.”
PUC is an application dated Nil received in this Hon’ble Court vide diary no.
CJS-1263 dated 16.05.2019 from Sh. Dhani ram, VPO Nasirpur, New Delhi, who is a
third person in the above noted cases. In his application he states that the plaintiffs
of the captioned suits are trying to illegally grab the village land which land actually
is of the Gram Sabha. He further requests to this Hon’ble Court to intervene and
save the village land from being illegally captured.

Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V, which is reproduced as under:

In view of the above matter may be placed before higher authorities for
soliciting orders as the whether
a) The PUC in original may be returned to the addressee, with the request to
Or
b) The same be placed before Hon’ble Court.
Or
c) The PUC may be returned to CJ Secretariat for onward transmission to
concerned Dealing Assistant of Public Interest Litigation (PIL).
The next date of hearing in both the captioned suits is 05.09.2019 before
Hon’ble Court.
If serial ‘a’ is approved DFA is added for approval and issue.
AO(Judl.)(O)
Ordinary
CS(OS) 572/2017 & CS(OS) 350/2017 (DA 2)

No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Sh. Dhani Ram,

VPO-Nasirpur,
New Delhi-110045.
SUB: Your letter dated Nil regarding usurption of land at Nasirpur, Delhi.
Sir,
I am directed to refer to your application dated NIl received in this Court

vide diary no. CJS-1263 dated 16.05.2019 addressed to the Hon’ble Chief Justice
of High Court of Delhi and to inform you that as per Delhi High Court Rules &
Orders Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1, applications/documents sought to be
presented to the Court for taking some judicial action shall be presented by
litigants or their advocates at the Filing Counter of this Court between 10.00AM
to 04.00PM on all working days.
Yours faithfully
(J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl:
2. Your application in original received vide diary no.CJS-1263 dated
16.05.2019.
CS(OS) No. 572/2017
DA2/DA3
“Sanjeev Solanki Vs. Union of India & Ors.”
& CS(OS) No. 350/2017
“Pradeep Solanki Vs. Union of India & Ors.”
PUC is an application dated Nil received in this Hon’ble Court vide diary no.
CJS-1263 dated 16.05.2019 from Sh. Dhani ram, VPO Nasirpur, New Delhi, who is a
third person in the above noted cases. In his application he states that the plaintiffs
of the captioned suits are trying to illegally grab the village land which land actually
is of the Gram Sabha. He further requests to this Hon’ble Court to intervene and
save the village land from being illegally captured.
In view of above, if agreed, the letter may be placed before the Hon’ble
Court on 05.09.2019 (date fixed) for information. In the meantime the said letter
may be sent to translation branch for translating it in English language.
Submitted.
AO(Judl.)(O)
Ordinary
DA 2
No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
The Secretary,
Ministry of External Affiars,
Jawahar Lal Nehru, 23D, Maulana Azad Road,
Rajpath Area, Central Secretariat,
New Delhi.
SUB: Status report of complete suit paperbook of CS(COMM) 54/2016

titled as “Qarshi Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mr. Abdul Mueed &
Ors.”
Sir/Madam,
I am directed to request you to please forward to this Court at the

earliest the status report of complete suit paperbook dispatched vide
diary no. 14517/I/Orgl/DHC/DA2 dated 11.10.2018 and received at your
office on 12.10.2018.
Copies of the aforementioned letter a well as a request letter in this
reard received from the Counsel in this case, are enclosed herewith for
your ready reference.
Yours faithfully
Assistant Registrar
(Orgl.)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl: Copy of docket no. 14517/I/Orgl/DHC/DA-2 dated 11.10.2018 received at

Ministry of
External Affairs, New Delhi on 12.10.2018.
(Ordinary)
DA-2
No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mr. Pallav Mongia, Advocate On Record,

(Supreme Court of India),
Office Adress: A-165 (LGF), Defence Colony,
New Delhi-110024.
(m) 9650530410.
Email: [email protected].
SUB: CS(COMM) No. 1271/2018.
Powercom Technology Ji’An Limited & Anr. ...Plaintiffs
Vs.
Lemon Electronics Ltd. & Ors. …

Defendants
Sir,
no. 27337 on 15.10.2019 in the abovementioned matter wherein you have complained
regarding non-location of case file and dealing with the Process fee for issuance of summons,
and to inform you that the process fee was filed 3 times and returned under following
objections:-
(1) Process fee filed on 30.03.2019 vide diary No. 295902 (in compliance of order dated
19.03.2019 was returned on 11.04.2019 for want of 1 Regd. AD cover. No SMS was
sent regarding this objection as there was no mobile number in the
database/software.
(2) Process fee filed on 02.07.2019 vide diary No. 551322 (in compliance of order dated
23.05.2019) was returned on 04.07.2019 for want of 1 Regd. AD cover. An SMS
regarding this objection was sent on mobile No. 9654530410 on 10.07.2019.
(3) Process fee on 26.07.2019 vide diary No. 672576 was returned as there was no fresh
order for issuance of summons/notice for the next date of hearing and without any
specific order summons cannot be issued. An SMS regarding this objection was sent
on mobile No. 9654530410 on 08.08.2019.
It is further informed that the case files of CS(COMM) 1271/2018 were and are very
much available and were duly inspected by your associate, Mr. Abhinav Goyal on 26.07.2019.
Yours faithfully
(J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Ordinary
DA – 2

No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mr. Charanjit Singh

Anand Automotive Private Limited
1, Sri Aurobindo Marg, Hauz Khas,
New Delhi-110016.
SUB: CS(OS) 1780/2006.
Diwan Chand Anand Plaintiff
Vs.
Shri Deep Chand Anand And Ors. Defendants
Madam,
With reference to your application dated 14.04.2019, I am directed to inform

you that as per Rule 1, Part A(a), Chapter 1, Volume V, Delhi High Court Rules &
Orders (copy enclosed), applications/documents sent by the litigant through post for
taking some judicial action are not entertained by this Court, and the same are
returned in original alongwith with their enclosures. It is further directed to inform
you that the captioned suit has already been listed in the Final category of cause list
at Serial no. 3 under the heading of “Senior Citizens”.
working days.
Yours faithfully

(O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl: As above.
DA – 2 (DFA)
(Ordinary)
No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mrs. Veena Jaitly,

D/o. Late Gian Chand Jaitly,
At: A-503, Mayur Tower CHS Ltd.,
Military Road, Marol Andheri (E),
Mumbai 400059.
SUB: CS(OS) No. 1780/2006.a

Diwan Chand Anand ...Plaintiff
Vs.
Shri Deep Chand Anand And Others …

Defendants
Madam,
I am directed to refer to the letter dated 18.10.2019 jointly signed by Mrs. Rama
S. Devgan and Mrs. Veena Jaitly received in this Court vide diary No. 29042 on
02.11.2019 and to inform you that as per Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V,
Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1, applications/documents sent by the litigants through post
for taking some judicial action shall be not be entertained by this Court as such the
same are returned herewith (in original along with its annexure). It is further informed
that litigants or their duly appointed/authorized Advocate(s) can file
application/documents sought to be presented before Court at the Filing Counter of this
Court between 10.00AM to 04.00PM on all working days.
Yours faithfully

(O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl:
2. Your letter in original along with annexure received vide diary no.29042 on
02.11.2019.
Copy to: Mrs. Rama S. Devgan, D/o. Late Gian Chand Jaitly, E-4/23, Vijay Nagar, Marol
Maroshi
Marg, Near Palloti Church, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400059.
Ordinary
DA – 2

No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mr. Harcharan Singh Sarna,

B-194, Second Floor, Sector-92, Noida,
Uttar Pradesh-201304.
(m) 9555173737.
SUB: CS(OS) 265/2018.
Harcharan Singh Plaintiff

Vs.
Mohd. Javed Ahmed Defendant
Sir,
This is in reference to letter dated 31.01.2020, I am directed to inform you

that as per Rule 1, Part A(a), Chapter 1, Volume V, Delhi High Court Rules & Orders
(copy enclosed), applications/documents sent by the litigant through post for taking
some judicial action are not entertained by this Court, and the same are returned
herewith in original alongwith its enclosures.
working days.
However, you are informed that a copy of your application has been
forwarded to the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee, 33-38, Lawyers’
Chamber, Block I, Delhi High Court for providing legal aid to you as per rules.
You may contact the said Legal Services Committee for this purpose, if you
so desire. A copy of the letter sent to the committee is annexed hereto for your
reference.
Yours faithfully
(J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl: As above.
Ordinary
DA – 2

No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mr. Ashok Gupta

Baapu NGO Bureau, WZ-0007, Basai Darapur,
NCTD, New Delhi-110015.
SUB: CS(OS) 1335/2005 (Transferred matter).
Sameera Kohli Plaintiff

Vs.
Soumitra Kohli & Ors. Defendants
Sir,
I am directed to request you to file duly signed letters at the filing

counter (Original side) between the hours of 10.00AM to 04.00PM on every
day which is not a Court holiday.
A copy of Rule 1, Part A(a), Chapter 1, Vol V, Delhi High Court Rules &
Orders is also enclosed herewith for reference alongwith yours letters in
original.
Yours
faithfully
(J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl: As above.
CS(OS) 1882/2006. [Transferred matter)
(DA2)
SUNDSTRAND FORMS PRIVATE LIMITED

Vs.
THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
LTD.
Kindly see the noting at Flag ‘A’ forwarded by Cash II branch of this
Court, whereby, it has been informed that a Cheque dated 27.01.2016 for
25,000/- in favour of plaintiff i.e. “Sundstrand Forms Private Limited”
which was lying with the Cash branch of this Court for release of payment
has been expired and fresh orders are required for re-issuance of the
same.
They have therefore requested in the said noting to inform the concerned
party of the suit to file a proper application for re-issuance and release of
cheque.
In this connection, it is submitted that the abovesaid suit has been

transferred to the D&SJ (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi vide order dated
01.12.2015 due to change in the pecuniary jurisdiction.
In view of above, if agreed, a letter may be sent to the D&SJ (South),

Saket Courts, New Delhi requesting therein to inform the concerned party
to file a proper application for re-issuance and release of cheque.
DFA is added herewith for approval and issue.
AOJ(O)
Ordinary/Email
DA – 2

No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
The District & Sessions Judge (South),
Saket Courts,
New Delhi.
SUB: CS(OS) 1882/2006 (Transferred matter).
Sundstrand Forms Private Limited Plaintiff

Vs.
The National Insurance Company Ltd. Defendants
Sir/Madam,
Vide order dated 01.12.2015 the aforesaid Suit stands transferred to

D&SJ(South) Saket Court, New Delhi. Further, I am directed to, please
request you to inform the plaintiff of the suit CS(OS) 1882/2006 i.e.
“Sundstrand Forms Private Limited” that a cheque dated 27.01.2016 for
Rs.25,000/- was lying with the Cash Branch of this Court for release of
payment in favour of “Sundstrand Forms Private Limited” but since no one
came to collect it, the same has become time-barred.
It is further requested to kindly direct the plaintiff to file a proper
application for re-issuance and release of cheque.
Yours
faithfully
Assistant Registrar
(O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Copy to:
1. (Plaintiff) Sundstrand Forms Private Ltd., by its Chairman and Managing Director and authorized
representative Shri B. Dey, Having its registered office at K-2A, Hauz Khas Enclave, New Delhi-110016.
2. The Concerned Dealing Assistant of Cash II Branch, Delhi High Court, New Delhi.
-:1:-
CS(OS) 1544/2005. (Disposed of case) DA2
“Ajay Dureja Vs. Anglican Church of India”
PUC is a complaint letter Dated 27.06.2020 received from Mr.

Philemon Lal, S/o. Late Rev. V. H. Lal, R/o. House No. 1, Bulliward
Road, Church Compound, 12, Civil Lines Delhi-110054 forwarded to
this branch from the Chief Justice Secretariat.
It is stated in the said letter that transfer/sale of Govt. land

bearing Khasra No. 669/204, Village Pipal Thala, Tehsil-Model Town,
District North West, Delhi is illegal & pray that a fair & impartial
inquiry be conducted in the matter.
Complainant states in para 6 of his letter that
“That certain Land Mafia, including persons

associated with said Anglican Church of India
(Defendant No. 1) are involved in the grabbing of
land, belonging to the Govt. and disposing of the
same by illegal means, including forged documents
and misusing the process of law for their selfish
motives.”.
para 7
“That a number of litigations are pending

adjudication/invstigation before various
Courts/Police Stations against the persons,
associated with the said Anglican Church of India,
relating to cheating, forgery, criminal breach of
trust and misappropriation of Govt. Land”.
The captioned suit i.e. CS(OS) 1544/2005 has been decreed

vide order dated 08.01.2008 (copy enclosed) and accordingly a
decree sheet dt. 08.01.2008 (copy enclosed) was prepared.
Thereafter, the suit file was sent to the RKD branch for consignment
and the same has been weeded out on 22.11.2019.
In this connection, kind attention is invited to Rule 1, Chapter 1,

Part A(a) of Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V, which is
reproduced as under:
“1. To be deposited in petition box during

Court hours – All ordinary appeals, petitions and
applications for review or revision, written
statements, affidavits or other documents sought to
be presented to the Court, shall be presented by
litigants or their Advocates by depositing them in
the petition box of the Court outside the room of the
Deputy Registrar [now on the filing counter
(original side) on the ground floor of new
Delhi High Court building] between the hours of
10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on every day which is not a Court
holiday. Petitions, written statements, affidavits or
other documents sought to be presented to the
Court, sent by litigants through post for taking some
judicial action shall not be entertained by this Court
but returned per bearing post.”
-:2:-
In view of the above, matter may be placed before higher

authorities for soliciting orders as the whether:-
a) The PUC in original may be returned to the addressee, with the

request to file the same at Filing counter (Original side)
between 10.00AM to 4.00PM on working day in accordance with
the High Court Rules.
Or
b) The same be placed before Hon’ble Court.
Or
c) The PUC may be returned to CJ Secretariat for onward
transmission to concerned Dealing Assistant of Public Interest
Litigation (PIL).
If serial ‘a’ is approved DFA is added for approval and issue.
AO(Judl.)(O)
Ordinary
CS(OS) 1544/20005 (DA 2)

No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Sh. Philemon Lal,

S/o. Late Rev. V. H. Lal,
R/o. House No. 1, Bulliward Road,
Church Compound, 12, Civil Lines,
Delhi-110054.
(m) 8178675514.
SUB: Letter dated 27.06.2020 regarding illegal transfer/sale of Govt. Land.
Sir,
I am directed to refer to your letter dated 27.06.2020 addressed to the

Hon’ble Chief Justice of High Court of Delhi and to inform you that as per Delhi
High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1, (copy enclosed)
Counter of this Court between 10.00AM to 04.00PM on all working days.
Yours faithfully
(J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl:
2. Your letter dated 27.06.2020 (in original) addressed to the Hon’ble
Chief Justice of High Court of Delhi.
Rule 1, Chapter 1, Part A(a) of Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V :-

CS(OS) 1544/2005. (Disposed of case) DA2
“Ajay Dureja Vs. Anglican Church of India”
PUC is a complaint letter Dated 27.06.2020 received from Mr.

Philemon Lal, S/o. Late Rev. V. H. Lal, R/o. House No. 1, Bulliward Road,
Church Compound, 12, Civil Lines Delhi-110054 forwarded to this branch
from the Chief Justice Secretariat and received in the branch on 04.09.2020.
It is stated in the said letter that transfer/sale of Govt. land bearing

Khasra No. 669/204, Village Pipal Thala, Tehsil-Model Town, District North
West, Delhi is illegal & pray that a fair & impartial inquiry be conducted in
the matter.
It is submitted that CS(OS) 1544/2005 has been decreed vide order

dated 08.01.2008 (copy enclosed) and accordingly a decree sheet dt.
08.01.2008 (copy enclosed) was prepared. Thereafter, the suit file was sent
to the RKD branch for consignment and the same has been weeded out on
22.11.2019.
In this connection, kind attention is invited to Rule 1, Chapter 1, Part

A(a) of Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V, which is reproduced as
under:
“1. To be deposited in petition box during Court

hours – All ordinary appeals, petitions and applications
for review or revision, written statements, affidavits or
other documents sought to be presented to the Court,
shall be presented by litigants or their Advocates by
depositing them in the petition box of the Court outside
the room of the Deputy Registrar [now on the filing
counter (original side) on the ground floor of new
Delhi High Court building] between the hours of 10
a.m. to 4 p.m. on every day which is not a Court holiday.
Petitions, written statements, affidavits or other
documents sought to be presented to the Court, sent by
litigants through post for taking some judicial action
shall not be entertained by this Court but returned per
bearing post.”
In view of above, if approved, the PUC in original may be returned to

the addressee, with the request to file the same at Filing counter (Original
side) between 10.00AM to 4.00PM on working day in accordance with the
High Court Rules.
AO(Judl.)(O)
Ordinary
CS(OS) 1544/20005 (DA 2)

No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Sh. Philemon Lal,

S/o. Late Rev. V. H. Lal,
R/o. House No. 1, Bulliward Road,
Church Compound, 12, Civil Lines,
Delhi-110054.
(m) 8178675514.
SUB: Letter dated 27.06.2020 regarding illegal transfer/sale of Govt. Land.

[CS(OS)1544/2005 titled as “Ajay Dureja Vs. Anglican Church of
India”]
Sir,
I am directed to refer to your letter dated 27.06.2020 addressed to the

Hon’ble Chief Justice of High Court of Delhi received in this Branch on
04.09.2020 and to inform you that as per Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol.
V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1, (copy enclosed) applications/documents sought
to be presented to the Court for taking some judicial action shall be presented
by litigants or their advocates at the Filing Counter of this Court between
10.00AM to 04.00PM on all working days.
Yours
faithfully
Administrative
Officer (J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl:
2. Your letter dated 27.06.2020 (in original) addressed to the Hon’ble
Chief Justice of High Court of Delhi.
Ordinary
CS(COMM) 663/2018 (DA 2)

No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:

High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mr. Sandeep Lamba, Assistant Commissioner of Police,

Inter State Cell, Crime Branch,
Chanakyapuri, New Delhi.
SUB: Letter No. 552/R/ACP/ISC, Crime Branch, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi

Dt.26.02.2021
Sir,
In reference to your letter mentioned above, I am directed to

forward herewith certified copy to copy of Court fee stamps bearing Nos.
061523, 061524, 077197, 077198, 077554, 077362 and 077361 as the
said Court fee stamps (in original) have already been sent to The
Collector, Chief Revenue Controlling Authority, 5 Shamnath Marg, Delhi
along with the Court fee refund certificate U/s. 16 of Court fee Act vide
diary No. 1658-59-I/Orgl.DHC/DA-2 dated 01.02.2019.
Yours
faithfully
(Judl.) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl: As above.
Through Special Messenger
CS(OS) 1604/2012 (DA 3)

No................................................Orgl./DAIII/DHC...........................
From:

High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mr. B. K. Pradhan,
Superintendent of Police,
Central Bureau of Investigation,
Special Crime-1,
5-B, CGO Complex,
Lodhi Road,
New Delhi
SUB: Supply of certified copies of CS(OS) 1604/2012 for investigation in

RC.8(S)/2021-CBI/SC-1/New Delhi
Sir,
With reference to the letter No.3514/RC.08(S)/2021-SC-1/CBI/New Delhi dated

09.09.2012 (copy enclosed) I am directed to forward herewith the certified copies of the
following documents of case bearing No. CS(OS) 1604/2012:
Sr. No.
Type of documents
1 Petition of CS(OS) 1604/2012
2 Order dated 28.05.2012 passed in CS(OS) 1604/2012

Yours faithfully
Administrative Officer (J) (O)

for REGISTRAR GENERAL
RK
Encl: As above.
Email/Whats app.
CS(OS) 308/2018 (DA 2)

No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Advocate & Mr. Soayib Qureshi, Advocate,

A-220, Defence Colony,
New Delhi-110024.
M: 8800718260
Email: [email protected];
SUB: Self attested copies of the Pan Cards of Auction Purchasers.
Sir/s,
I am directed to request you to furnish self attested copies of Pan Cards of

Auction Purchasers to this Court at the earliest so that the Cash Branch of this
Court may comply order dated 16.04.2021 passed in this matter.
Yours
faithfully
Administrative
Officer (J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Email
CS(OS) 1213/2012 (DA 2)
No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
The Assistant Commissioner (General),
Office of the Deputy Commissioner,
DAC Complex, Sri Muktsar Sahib,
Punjab 152026.
Ph: 01633-263643.
SUB: Letter No. 488/Peshi Dated 26.04.2021.
[CS(OS)1213/2012 titled as “Balwinder Kaur Brar Vs. Baldev Singh Gill &
Ors.”]
Sir/Madam,
I am directed to refer to your Letter No. 488/Peshi Dated 26.04.2021

addressed to the Worthy Registrar General of this Court and to inform you that as
forwarded by the Cash branch of this Court the Bank Account details of Worthy
Registrar General, Delhi High Court, New Delhi are as under:-
Account holder’s name : DELHI HIGH COURT PDC ACCOUNT

Bank’s name : UCO BANK
Branch : DELHI HIGH COURT BRANCH
Account type : SAVINGS
Account No. : 15530110030226
IFSC : UCBA0001553
Note: The concerned party is required to submit in the

deposit letter the complete case particulars, order under
reference, transaction details including UTR No. etc, after
transferring the amount in the above noted account.

Yours
faithfully
(J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl: Copy of Letter No. 488/Peshi/Dated 26.04.2021.

Ordinary/Electronic Mode
CS(COMM) 77/2021 (DA 3)

CS(COMM) 82/2021 (DA1)
CS(COMM) 477/2020 (DA3)

No................................................Orgl./DAIII/DHC...........................
From:

High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Sr. SI Chandagi Ram,

P.S. Sector-20, Noida,
Distt. Gautam Budh Nagar,
U.P.
SUB: Certified copies for investigation in Case Crime No. 212/21 u/s 420, 406, 409, 120-
B IPC.
Sir,
I am directed to refer to your letters dated 05.08.2021 on the aforesaid

subject and to inform you that the certified copies as sought for cannot be
supplied since as per Delhi High Court Rules, Vol. V, Chapter V, Rule 11
(copy enclosed) a request letter to supply certified copy of records to public
officer should be forwarded by Head of the Department (i.e. S.S.P. in your
case).
Yours
faithfully
(J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl:
1. Both letters dated 05.08.2021 in original.
2. Copy of Delhi High Court Rules, Vol. V, Chapter V, Rule 11.
Ex. Pet. No. 116/2016. Ex.
“Shri Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Mr. Surinder lal Aggarwal (since deceased
& Ors.”
PUC is an application dated 07.06.2021 received in this

Court through speed post from Mr. Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal
(Decree-holder), 61/26, Ramjas Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-
110005, wherein it is requested by the Decree-holder to bring the
legal heirs of Judgment debtor No. 1 on record.
In this connection, kind attention is invited to Rule 1,

Chapter 1, Part A(a) of Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V,
which is reproduced as under:
“1. To be deposited in petition

box during Court hours – All ordinary
appeals, petitions and applications for review
or revision, written statements, affidavits or
other documents sought to be presented to
the Court, shall be presented by litigants or
their Advocates by depositing them in the
petition box of the Court outside the room of
the Deputy Registrar [now on the filing
counter (original side) on the ground
floor of new Delhi High Court building]
between the hours of 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on
every day which is not a Court holiday.
Petitions, written statements, affidavits or
other documents sought to be presented to
the Court, sent by litigants through post for
taking some judicial action shall not be
entertained by this Court but returned per
bearing post.”
In view of the above, if agreed to, the PUC (in original)

may be returned to the Decree-holder, with the request to file the
same at Filing counter (Original side) between 10.00AM to
4.00PM on any working day in accordance with the High Court
Rules.
DFA is added herewith for approval.
AO(Judl.)(O)
Ordinary
Ex. Pet. No. 116/2016 (Ex.)

No................................................Orgl./DAII/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mr. Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal,

Decree-holder,
61/26, Ramjas Road, Karol Bagh,
New Delhi-110005.
(m) 9811510538.
SUB: Application dated 07.06.2021 received in this Hon’ble Court through Speed
post.
Sir,
I am directed to refer to your application dated 07.06.2021, received in

this Hon’ble Court through Speed post for bringing Legal heirs of Judgment
debtor No. 1 on record and to inform you that as per Delhi High Court Rules &
Orders Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1, (copy enclosed)
Counter of this Court between 10.00AM to 04.00PM on all working days. These
days the same can be filed online as well.
Yours faithfully
Administrative
Officer (J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl:
2. Application dated 07.06.2021 (in original) received in this Hon’ble
Court through speed post.
Ordinary (DA3)
CS(COMM) 413/2020

No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Ms. Gauri Webster

W/o. Mr. Christopher H. K. Webster,
R/o. 7, Amaltas Avenue, Westend Greens,
Rajokri, Near Shiv Murti,
New Delhi-110038.
SUB: Request letter dated 02.08.2021 against the Pathways School management,
Gurgaon.
Madam,
I am directed to refer to your request letter dated 02.08.2021, received in this

Hon’ble Court on 02.08.2021 vide diary No. CJS/1689 and to inform you that as per
Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1, (copy
enclosed) applications/documents sought to be presented to the Court for taking some
judicial action shall be presented by litigants or their advocates at the Filing Counter
of this Court between 10.00AM to 04.00PM on all working days (Now-a-days
through online as well).
Yours
faithfully
(J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl:
2. Letter dated 02.08.2021 (in original) along with annexures received in this
Hon’ble Court vide diary No. CJS/1689 on 02.08.2021.
CS(OS) 1533/2009 (DA3)

No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:

High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Insp. Ritesh Kumar,
SHO/PS Greater Kailash-1,
New Delhi
SUB: Original documents requested for investigation in FIR No. 261/16,

u/S. 420/467/468/471/120B IPC, PS Greater Kailash-1, New Delhi.
Sir,
I am directed to refer to your letter dated Nil on the aforesaid subject and
to inform you that Original documents of any case can not be provided to
anyone unless there is Hon’ble Court’s order.
However, certified copies of the documents may be supplied to public
officers on an application endorsed by the Head of the Department concerned
(i.e. A.C.P or above in your case).
A copy of Rule 11, Chapter V, Delhi High Court Rules Volume V is
enclosed herewith.
Yours
faithfully
(J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl:
1. Letter dated Nil in original.
2. Copy of Rule 11, Chapter V, Delhi High Court Rules Volume V.
CS(OS) 140/2008 (DA3)

No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:

High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Insp. Ritesh Kumar,
SHO/PS Greater Kailash-1,
New Delhi
SUB: Original documents requested for investigation in FIR No. 261/16,

u/S. 420/467/468/471/120B IPC, PS Greater Kailash-1, New Delhi.
Sir,
I am directed to refer to your letter dated Nil on the aforesaid subject and
to inform you that Original documents of any case can not be provided to
anyone unless there is Hon’ble Court’s order.
However, certified copies of the documents may be supplied to public
officers on an application endorsed by the Head of the Department concerned
(i.e. A.C.P or above in your case).
A copy of Rule 11, Chapter V, Delhi High Court Rules Volume V is
enclosed herewith.
Yours
faithfully
(J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl:
1. Letter dated Nil in original.
Copy of Rule 11, Chapter V, Delhi High Court Rules Volume V.
Through Special Messenger (DA3)
CS(OS) 140/2008
No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Ms. Nandini Sahni, Advocate,
Ch. No. 480, Block II, Delhi High Court,
New Delhi-110003
(M) 9810034205.
SUB: Extension of Bank Guarantee bearing No. 0378613BG1000007 .

Madam,
I am directed to return original papers (Total 5 pages) under objections, filed

in this Hon’ble Court vide diary No. 14589 on 20.09.2021 regarding extension of
Bank Guarantee bearing No. 0378613BG1000007 as the same are not in terms of the
practice direction No. 76/Rules/DHC dt. 25.06.2021 (copy enclosed).
The relevant part of the practice direction dated 25.06.2021 is quoted below:-
“That henceforth, a clause of term shall be
necessarily incorporated in every Bank Guarantee
furnished by a party in this Court for release of the
amounts deposited in the Court, Such terms shall be to
the effect, that in case the Bank Guarantee is not
renewed at least ten days before the expiry of the Bank
Guarantee, by the party at whose instance the Bank
Guarantee has been furnished, proceed to encash the
Bank Guarantee and remit the amount thereunder to the
beneficiary under the Bank Guarantee”
I am further directed to request you to re-file the said original papers for
extension of Bank Guarantee after getting the above clause incorporated in the
same.
Yours
faithfully
(J) (O)
for REGISTRAR
GENERAL
RK
Encl:
1. Copy of practice directions No. 76/Rules/DHC dt. 25.06.2021.
2. The original papers (5 pages) filed vide diary No. 14589 on 20.09.2021 in this Hon’ble Court.
CS(OS) 634/2019 DA3
“Nahar Singh & Ors. Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.”
PUC is a summon to witness received from the Court of Mr.
Kartik Taparia, Civil Judge-02 (Central), Room No. 354, IIIrd Floor, Tis
Hazari Court, Delhi vide Diary No. 18253 on 02.12.2021 wherein it is
directed to bring the record of CS(OS) 634/2019 titled as “ Arun Kumar
Jain Vs. Padam Chand Jain & Ors.” along with probate file attached
therewith.
It has been observed that the parties name i.e. “Arun Kumar Jain Vs.
Padam Chand Jain & Ors.” as mentioned in summons does not tally with
the parties name of case number i.e. CS(OS) 634/2019, moreso, no probate
case is attached with CS(OS) 634/2019.
In view of above facts, if agreed to, a request may be sent to Mr.

Kartik Taparia, Civil Judge-02 (Central), Room No. 354, IIIrd Floor, Tis
Hazari Court, Delhi to please send the correct case number and record be
summoned accordingly.
AO(Judl.)(O)
Through special messenger
No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC.........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
The Controller of Publication,
Department of Publication,
Civil Lines,
Delhi-110054.
SUB: Publication of 2 Nos. of Public notices in Official Gazette
of India in the matter of C.O. (COMM.IPD-CR) 14/2021
& other.
Sir/Madam,
This is in compliance to order dated 06.10.2021 passed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice
Sanjeev Narula of this Court in C.O. (COMM.IPD-CR) 14/2021 & other connected matters
read with orders dated 08.11.2021, 12.11.2021 & 24.11.2021 passed in connected matters
whereby the Hon’ble Court has directed to issue 2 Nos. of Public notices (copy enclosed) in
official Gazette of India.
In this regard, 2 Nos. of Public notices (in English and Hindi language) are
forwarded herewith for publication in Official Gazette of India in Part II Section II.
Yours faithfully

RK
Encl:
1. 2 Nos. of Public notices (in English and Hindi both languages).
2. Certificate stating that the content of hard copies of said Public notices is same as soft
copies contained in Pen drive.
3. Payment slip of Rs.11,000/- (5500X2) paid by Mr. Abhishek Malhotra, Advocate, vide
Bharatkosh Trans. Ref. No. 2112210002350.
4. Payment slip of Rs.11,000/- (5500X2) paid by Saikrishna And Associates vide NEFT
Trans. Ref. No. HSBCN21357833331.
5. Copy of English and Hindi Newspapers (Times of India and Dainik Bhaskar
respectively) Published the said Two Notices.
6. Certified copies of order dated 06.10.2021, 08.11.2021, 12.11.2021 & 24.11.2021
passed in C.O.(COMM.IPD-CR) 14/21 & connected matters.
7. Copy of said 2 Public notices uploaded on the website of Delhi High Court.
Ordinary (DA3)

No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Defendant No. 2
Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta
R/o. C-25, Nizamuddin East,
New Delhi-110013.
M: 9810030286, 9891288583
SUB: Complaint letter dated 19.02.2022.
Sir,
I am directed to refer to your complaint dt.19.02.2022 (copy enclosed) and

to inform you that on scrutiny of the record no malice or fraudulent practice is
found to be made by any official of this Court. The allegations in the said
complaint are without substance, hence filed.
Yours faithfully
(J) (O)
RK
Encl: as above.
DA – 3
(Ordinary)
No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Sh. Sajal Banik,
S/o. Sarada Charan Banik Roy
R/o. A.A. Road, Dharmanagar,
P.O. & P.S. Teliamura,
Dist. Khowai,
Tripura,
SUB: CS(COMM) No. 117/2022

Exxon Mobil Corporation ...Plaintiff
Vs.
Mr. Sajal Banik Trading as Maa Usha Mobil House …Defendants
Sir/Madam,
I am directed to refer to the Written statement dated Nil received through speed post
in this Court vide diary No. 7093 on 25.04.2022 and to inform you that as per Delhi High
Court Rules & Orders Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1 (copy enclosed), written
statements, affidavits or other documents received through post for taking some judicial
action shall be not be entertained by this Court as such the same are returned herewith (in
original along with its annexure, if any). It is further informed that litigant(s) or their duly
working days (Nowadays through online as well).
Yours faithfully

RK
Encl: 1. Copy of Rule 1 of Chapter 1 of Delhi High Court Rules.

2. WS in original received through speed post bearing D No. 7093
dt.25.04.2022.
DA – 3
(Ordinary)
No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Sh. Madhu Paul,
S/o. Sh. Lt. Nityananda Paul,
R/o. A.A. Road, Dharmanagar,
P.O. & P.S. Teliamura,
Dist. Khowai,
Tripura,
SUB: CS(COMM) No. 123/2022.

Exxon Mobil Corporation ...Plaintiff
Vs.
Mr. Madhu Paul trading as
M/s. Mahanam Mobil House …Defendants
Sir/Madam,
I am directed to refer to the Written statement dated Nil, sworn on 13.04.2022

received through speed post in this Court vide diary No. 7092 on 25.04.2022 and to inform
you that as per Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1 (copy
enclosed), written statements, affidavits or other documents received through post for taking
some judicial action shall be not be entertained by this Court as such the same are returned
herewith (in original along with its annexure, if any). It is further informed that litigant(s) or
their duly appointed/authorized Advocate(s) can file application/documents sought to be
presented before Court at the Filing Counter of this Court between 10.00AM to 04.00PM on
all working days (Now-a-days through online as well).
Yours faithfully

RK

2. WS in original received through speed post bearing D No. 7092
dt.25.04.2022.
DA – 3
(Ordinary)
No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mrs. Manpreet Kaur,
H. No. 2152/44-C,
Chandigarh,
SUB: CS(OS) No. 444/2019.

Mr. Harjyot Singh ...Plaintiff
Vs.
Mrs. Manpreet Kaur …Defendant
Madam,
I am directed to refer to the letter dated 25.06.2022 received through registered post
No. RP026202773IN in this Court vide diary No. 12238 on 01.07.2022 and to inform you
that as per Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1 (copy
Yours faithfully

RK

2. Letter dated 25.06.2022 along with enclosure (in original) received through
registered post vide D No. 12238 dated 01.07.2022.
DA – 3
(Ordinary)
No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mr. Dinesh Kumar Chaddha (Defendant No. 2)
R/o. 728, Janakpuri, P.O. Izat Nagar, Bareilly (U.P.),
Pin-243122.
SUB: CS(OS) No. 1077/2014.

Rajiv Jain ...Plaintiff
Vs.
Virender Kumar Chaddha & Ors. …Defendants
Sir,
I am directed to refer to the letter dated 04.02.2020 (along with enclosure) received
through speed post vide PoD No. EU110164545IN in this Court vide diary No. 4203 on
12.02.2020 and to inform you that as per Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V, Chapter
1, Part A(a), Rule 1 (copy enclosed), written statements, affidavits or other documents
received through post for taking some judicial action shall be not be entertained by this
Court as such the same are returned herewith (in original along with its annexure, if any). It
is further informed that litigant(s) or their duly appointed/authorized Advocate(s) can file
Court between 10.00AM to 04.00PM on all working days (Now-a-days through online as
well).
Yours faithfully

RK

2. Letter dated 04.02.2020 along with enclosure (in original) received through
registered post vide D No. 12238 dated 01.07.2022.
DA – 3
(Ordinary)
No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mr. Virender Kumar Chaddha (Defendant No. 1)
R/o. 397 B, Phase II, Raj Kishor Nagar, Bilaspur (C.G.),
PIN: 495006.
SUB: CS(OS) No. 1077/2014.

Rajiv Jain ...Plaintiff
Vs.
Virender Kumar Chaddha & Ors. …Defendants
Sir,
I am directed to refer to the letters dated Nil & 04.09.2020 (along with enclosures)
received through speed post vide PoD Nos. EC144244344IN & EC143554092IN in this
Court vide diary Nos. 4890 on 17.02.2020 & 12127 on 15.09.2020 respectively and to
inform you that as per Delhi High Court Rules & Orders Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule
1 (copy enclosed), written statements, affidavits or other documents received through post
for taking some judicial action shall be not be entertained by this Court as such the same are
returned herewith (in original along with its annexure, if any). It is further informed that
litigant(s) or their duly appointed/authorized Advocate(s) can file application/documents
sought to be presented before Court at the Filing Counter of this Court between 10.00AM to
04.00PM on all working days (Now-a-days through online as well).
Yours faithfully

RK

2. Letters dated Nil & 04.09.2020 (in original) along with its enclosures received in
this Court through speed post vide PoD Nos. EC144244344IN &
EC143554092IN in this Court
DA – 3
(Ordinary)
No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
The Ld. S.D.M (HQ)/C.O.S
5, Sham Nath Marg,
Delhi-110054.

EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION
Vs.
M/S MOBIL HOUSE, THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR. NARESH AGARWAL
Sir/Madam,
With reference to letter No. F.21/05/CF-1131/COS/HQ/R/2022/7674 Dated

09.06.2022, I am directed to inform you that the below mentioned Court fees have been
locked by this Court.
Sr. No. E court fee Receipt No. Amount Status
1. DLCT1745C2043O188 1,00,000/- Locked
2. DLCT1745C2043O189 1,00,000/- Locked
You are requested to take further appropriate action, if any.
Yours faithfully

RK
Encl:. Copy of the letter No. F.21/05/CF-1131/COS/HQ/R/2022/7674 Dated 09.06.2022 alongwith copies
of court fees.
Copy to: Mr. Rahul Choudhary, Advocate (Counsel for the Plaintiff), Rahul Chaudhary & Partners, C-225,
Defence Colony, New Delhi-110024 Email: [email protected] .
DA – 3
(Ordinary)
No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Defendant No. 1
Mr. Satya Prakash Ravidas,
Present Address: 202, Ram Ratna Nivas,
Defense Colony, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad,
Telangana State, Pin-500094
M: 9121871580
SUB: CS(OS) No. 470/2019.

Raj Vidya Kendra (RVK) & Anr. ...Plaintiffs
Vs.
Satya Prakash Ravidas & Ors. …Defendants
Sir,
I am directed to refer to the letter dated 27.07.2022 (along with enclosures) received
through Registered post vide PoD Nos. RN137868375IN in this Court vide diary Nos. 14811
on 02.08.2022 and to inform you that as per Delhi High Court Rules, Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part
A(a), Rule 1 (copy enclosed), written statements, affidavits or other documents received
through post for taking some judicial action shall be not be entertained by this Court as such
the same are returned herewith (in original along with its annexure, if any). It is further
informed that litigant(s) or their duly appointed/authorized Advocate(s) can file
Court between 10.00AM to 04.00PM on all working days (Now-a-days through online as
well).
Yours faithfully

RK
Encl:
1. Letter dated 27.07.2022 alongwith enclosures (in original).
2. Copy of Delhi High Court Rules, Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1
CS(OS) 1604/2012 (DA 3)

No................................................Orgl./DAIII/DHC...........................
From:

High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mr. B. K. Pradhan,
Superintendent of Police,
Central Bureau of Investigation,
Special Crime-1,
5-B, CGO Complex,
Lodhi Road,
New Delhi
SUB: Supply of certified copies of CS(OS) 1604/2012 for investigation in

RC.8(S)/2021-CBI/SC-1/New Delhi
Sir,
With reference to the letter No.3514/RC.08(S)/2021-SC-1/CBI/New Delhi dated

09.09.2012 (copy enclosed) I am directed to forward herewith the certified copies of the
following documents of case bearing No. CS(OS) 1604/2012:
Sr. No.
Type of documents
1 Petition of CS(OS) 1604/2012
2 Order dated 28.05.2012 passed in CS(OS) 1604/2012

Yours faithfully

RK
Encl: As above.
DA – 3
(Ordinary)

No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:

High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
The District & Sessions Judge, SE District,

Saket Courts,
New Delhi
SUB: CS(OS) No. 1228/2009.

Dr. Surendra Kumar Sirpal ...Plaintiff
Vs.
Mr. Rajendra Sirpal …Defendant
Sir/Madam,
The captioned suit was transferred to South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi in
2016 due to change in pecuniar jurisdiction. I am directed to forward herewith a
“Handwriting Examination Report dated 20.04.2022 of CFSL” (in original) received in
this case. It is requested to place the same in case record.
It is further requested in the said CFSL report that the Exhibits be collected from
CFSL, Central Bureau of Investigation, Kendriya Karyalaya Parisar, Block No. 4, Lodhi
Road, New Delhi through any authorized representative carrying authority letter with his
signature duly attested immediately.
Yours faithfully

RK
Encl: Handwriting Examination Report dated 20.04.2022 of CFSL (in original).

DA – 3
(Ordinary)

No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:

High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Counsel for the Plaintiff

Ms. Vandana Tiwari, Advocate,
Address: G-333, Gama II,
Greater Noida,
PIN: 201310.
M: 8882542952.
Re: Your letter dated 05.12.2022 regarding refund of Court fee in CS(OS) No. 2576/2013.
Sushil Kumar ...Plaintiff
Vs.
M/s. Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. …Defendant
Sir/Madam,
In reference to your letter dated 05.12.2022, I am directed to inform you that a Court
Fee Refund Certificate of Rs.24,620/- was sent to The Collector, 5 Shamnath Marg, Delhi
vide D. No. 20061/Org/DA3 dated 01.08.2015 for the purpose. A copy of the same is
attached herewith for your information and follow up with the office of the aforesaid officer
i.e. The Collector, 5 Shamnath Marg, Delhi.
Yours faithfully

RK
Encl: Copy of the court fee receipt of Rs.24,620/- (Rs.24,600 + 20).

DA – 3
(Ordinary)

No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:

High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Counsel for the Plaintiff

Ms. Manjira Dasgupta, Advocate,
A64, Second Floor, Chittaranjan Park,
New Delhi-110019.
Re: Your letter dated 13.01.2023 regarding refund of Court fee in CS(COMM) No. 55/2021.
Mirable Health Services Private Limited ...Plaintiff
Vs.
Mrs. Alka Gupta and Anr. …Defendants
Sir/Madam,
In reference to your letter dated 13.01.2023, I am directed to inform you that a Court
Fee Refund Certificate of Rs.1,97,000/- in terms of order dated 04.03.2022 was sent to The
Collector, 5 Shamnath Marg, Delhi vide D. No. 7639/Org/DA3 dated 21.05.2022 for the
purpose. A copy of the same is attached herewith for your information and follow up with
the office of the aforesaid officer i.e. The Collector, 5 Shamnath Marg, Delhi.
Yours faithfully

RK
Encl: Copy of the court fee refund certificate with docket.

DA – 3
(To be served through Regd. AD on Govt. Expenses)

No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Defendant No. 3
Mr. Rashid Narain Shukul,
64, Mendip Cres, London N6E1H1,
Canada.
SUB: CS(OS) No. 684/2017.
Mr. Abhishek Narain and Anr. ...Plaintiffs

Vs.
Mrs. Kusum Shukla and Ors. …Defendants
Sir,
I am directed to refer to the letter dated Nil received through Registered post vide
PoD Nos. RN 544 163 862 CA in this Court vide diary Nos. 5816 on 07.03.2023 and to
inform you that as per Delhi High Court Rules, Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1 (copy
Yours faithfully

RK
Encl:
1. Letter dated Nil (in original).
2. Copy of Delhi High Court Rules, Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1
DA – 3
(To be served through Speed post on Govt. Expenses)

No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Defendant No. 1
Mr. Garvit Khandel, Proprietor Ektarfa Garments,
254, Alok Nagar, Kanadia Road, Indore-452016,
M.P.
(m) 8982032344.
Retail Royalty Company and Anr. ...Plaintiffs

Vs.
Garvit Khandelwal, Trading as Ektarfa Garmenta & Anr. …Defendants
Sir,
I am directed to refer to the Dak dated 11.03.2023 received through Speed post vide
PoD Nos. EI425604272IN in this Court vide diary No. 7461 on 28.03.2023 and to inform
you that as per Delhi High Court Rules, Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1 (copy
Yours faithfully

RK
Encl:
1. Dak dated 11.03.2023 (in original).
2. Copy of Delhi High Court Rules, Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1.
DA – 3
(Ordinary)

No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:

High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
The Administrative Officer Judicial,

Civil III Branch,
High Court of Delhi,
New Delhi
SUB: CS(COMM) No. 1314/2016.
Jindal Saw Limited ...Plaintiff

Vs.
Aperam Stainless Services and Solutions
Precision Sas and Ors. …Defendants
Sir/Madam,
Reference your letter No. 13323-X, J-III/C-5 dated 19.04.2023, I am directed

to forward herewith a CD containing complete data of case bearing No. CS(COMM)
1314/2016.
Yours faithfully

RK
Encl: A CD containing data of case bearing No. CS(COMM) 1314/2016.

DA – 3
(Ordinary)

No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
LR-1 of the Defendant
Mr. Bharat Bhushan Sharma,
S/o. Lt. Sh. R. D. Sharma,
10196/3, Jhandewalan, Pahar Ganj,
New Delhi-110055
M: 9868085065, [email protected]
SUB: CS(OS) No. 381/2016.
Badri Bhagat Jhandewala Temple Society ...Plaintiff
Vs.
Smt. Har Pyari …Defendant
Sir,
I am directed to refer to the letter dated 04.05.2023 received through Speed post vide
PoD No. ED150853313IN in this Court vide diary No. 10768 on 09.05.2023 and to inform
you that as per Delhi High Court Rules, Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1 (copy
herewith (in original along with its annexure, if any).

RK
Encl: 1. Complaint letter dated 04.05.2023 (in original).

2. Copy of Delhi High Court Rules, Vol. V, Chapter 1, Part A(a), Rule 1.
DA – 3
(___________________________)

No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:
The Registrar Original

High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
The Administrative Officer Judicial,

Civil III,
New Delhi
SUB: CS(OS) No. 2244/2008.
Harcharan Singh Hazooria ...Plaintiff
Vs.
Kulwant Singh Hazooria & Ors. …Defendants
Madam,
With reference to your letter No. 16469-X/C-5/J-III/DHC dated 15.05.2023 I am

directed to forward herewith the Original record of CS(OS) 2244/2008 (Total 17 Files). It is
requested to return this record back to this Branch well before the next date of hearing i.e.
18.08.2023 fixed in this matter.
It is further informed that the E-data of the abovementioned matter is available on the
server of this Court.

for REGISTRAR ORIGINAL
Encl: 1. Copy of letter No. 16469-X/C-5/J-III/DHC dated 15.05.2023 (in original).

2. Original record of CS(OS) 2244/2008 (total 17 Nos. of files in a Basta)
DA – 3
(Through Speed post on Govt. Expenses)

No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:

High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Sri V. S. S. Srinivasa Sarma, Judge,

Special Court for Trial and Disposal of Commercial Disputes,
Vijayawada,
Aandhra Pradesh.
Urban Mass Transit Company Limited ...Plaintiff
Vs.
Andhra Pradesh Metro Rail Corporation Limited …Defendant
Sir,
With reference to your letter dated 18.05.2023 I am directed to forward herewith

complete record of CS(COMM) 534/2022 in a CD/DVD since the case was filed before
this Court in e-form.

RK
Encl:
1. A CD/DVD containing the complete record of CS(COMM) 534/2022.
2. Copy of the letter dated 18.05.2023 received from your office.
DA – 3
(Through Ordinary)

No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:

High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
The Administrative Officer (Judicial)(Civil),

FAO(OS) 512/2015
New Delhi.
SUB: CS(OS) No. 2660/2015.
The Foundry Visionmongers Ltd. ...Plaintiff
Vs.
Satyanarayana Reddy S & Anr. …Defendants
Sir/Madam,
I am to request you to send the copies of the following documents to this Branch
for the purpose of preparation of Decree in CS(OS) 2660/2015 in terms of order dated
19.11.2015 (copy enclosed) passed in FAO(OS) 512/2015 titled as “The Foundry
Visionmongers Ltd. Vs. Satyanarayana Reddy S & Anr.”.
1. CM 22885/2015 filed in FAO(OS) 512/2015
2. Settlement Agreement dated 11.09.2015
3. Annexure-A (Marked as Exhibit C-1).

RK
Encl: Copy of the order dated 19.11.2015 passed in FAO(OS) 512/2015.
DA – 3

No................................................Orgl./DA3/DHC...........................
From:

High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
Mr. Sonu Agnihotri, ADJ-07,

(South-East), Saket Courts Complex,
New Delhi
SUB: CS(OS) No. 1306/2009.
Smt. Pramilla Devi ...Plaintiff
Vs.
Sh. Brahm Singh …Defendant
Sir,
With reference to your request letter dated 07.07.2023, I am directed to forward

herewith complete record of CS(OS) 1306/2009 (Total 6F) in original. Details of the
pagination are given below.

RK
Details of the pagination
Part I(A) Order side Page No. 1 to 70, Plaint side page No. 1 to 32
Part II Page No. 1 to 11
Part II B Page No. 1 to 11 (LHS), Page No. 1 to 58 (RHS)
IA Part Page No. 1 to 6
Part III Page No. 1 to 21
Exhibit Documents part Page No. 1 to 93 (LHS), Page No. 1 to 6 (RHS).
DA – 3

No.......... Orgl./DA3/DHC............... Date............
From:

High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
The Ambassador,
Embassy of India in France,
To be served through:
The Secretary (Foreign Affairs),
Ministry of External Affairs,
Address: J674+54V, E Block, Central Secretariat, New Delhi, Delhi 110001
Also at
23 D, Janpath Rd, Rajpath Area, Central Secretariat, New Delhi, Delhi 110011
SUB: Letter of Request in the matter CS(OS) No. 420/2012.
Jagmeet Kaur Babbar and Ors. ...Plaintiffs

Vs.
Eurocopter Group & Others ...Defendants
Respected Sir/Madam,
Reference order dated 03.10.2023 (copy enclosed) passed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dinesh
Kumar Sharma of this Court in CS(OS) 420/2012, your goodself is requested to appoint any
official of Embassy of India in France for making convenient the recording of evidence of
Mr. Michel Martin (DW-1) by modes of video-conferencing to the Competent Authority i.e., the
Service Civil de I’Entraide Judiciaire Internationale of the Ministry of Justice,
Government of France.
Yours faithfully
Assistant Registrar(O)
RK
Encl:
1.Copy of order dated 03.10.2023
2.Copy of memo of parties.
3.Copy of I.A. No. 8275/2023.
DA – 3

No.......... Orgl./DA3/DHC............... Date............
From:
High Court of Delhi
New Delhi.
To
The Ambassador,
Embassy of India in France,
To be served through:
The Secretary, ,
Ministry of Home Affairs,
Address: J674+VGV, North Block, Central Secretariat, New Delhi, 110001
Also through:
The Secretary, ,
Ministry of Law & Justice,
Address: 4th Floor, A-Wing, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-110001.
SUB: Letter of Request in the matter CS(OS) No. 420/2012.
Jagmeet Kaur Babbar and Ors. ...Plaintiffs

Vs.
Eurocopter Group & Others ...Defendants
Respected Sir/Madam,
Reference order dated 03.10.2023 (copy enclosed) passed by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dinesh
Kumar Sharma of this Court in CS(OS) 420/2012, your goodself is requested to appoint any
official of Embassy of India in France for making convenient the recording of evidence of
Mr. Michel Martin (DW-1) by modes of video-conferencing to the Competent Authority i.e., the
Service Civil de I’Entraide Judiciaire Internationale of the Ministry of Justice,
Government of France.
Yours faithfully
Assistant Registrar(O)
RK
Encl:
1.Copy of order dated 03.10.2023
2.Copy of memo of parties.
3.Copy of I.A. No. 8275/2023.

LETTER

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LETTER

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

LETTER

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DA – 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

The Registrar General

SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER(SDO)

Deputy Registrar (O)

Assitant Registrar (O)

SH. SANJAY KUMAR, ADJ,

In CS(OS)No. 2359/2015 & TR.P.(C) 21/2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Sub: Acknowledgement of receipt of Envelope.

A letter was sent to the Collector of Stamps alongwith the certified

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Sub: Determination of the stamp duty and penalty payable.

1. Copy of order dated 21.10.2016 passed by HMJ R. K. Gauba

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

I am directed to forward herewith a copy of order dated

You are therefore requested to provide the abovementioned

Sub: CS(OS) No. 290/2007.

Dr. V. P. Sharma Plaintiff

Dr. Poonam Sharma Defendant

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

SHRI DEVENDER KUMAR ...Plaintiff

Sub: Determination of the stamp duty and penalty payable.

This is in continuation of this Court’s letter No.

1. Copy of orders dated 21.10.2016 & 10.03.2017 passed by HMJ R. K.

In view of above, if approved, a reminder in this regard may be

Shri Bishan Singh Bhatt ...Plaintiff/s

As ordered by Hon’ble Court on 09.09.2014 The SHO of P.S. Shakarpur,

I am therefore directed to inform you to take the necessary action at

4. Copy of report of S.H.O., P.S. Shakarpur, Delhi..

Kindly see the orders dated 31.05.2013 & 09.09.2014 passed by

It is submitted that a Court Fee Refund Certificate was issued

Vide order dated 09.09.2014 the Hon’ble Court directed to the

The report of the SHO of P. S. Shakarpur, Delhi has been received

In view of above, if approved, a letter in this regard may be sent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER(SDO)

Deputy Registrar (O)

IN THE MATTER OF CS(OS) No. 647/2006

Smt. Kusum Kumria & Ors. Plaintiff/s

This is to certify that Smt. Sarawjeet Singh, W/o. Shri M. Jha,

R/o. W-152, Greater Kailash Part – I, New Delhi (Defendant No. 2

bearing no. W-152, Greaer Kailash Part – I, New Delhi – 110048,

(except its First Floor), at a sale consideration of Rs.10.65

Crores(Rupees Ten Crores Sixty Five Lakh Only) by Court Auction

been duly confirmed by this Court vide order dated 15.05.2014

passed in the case. As the defendant No. 2 has 50% undivided

share in the aforesaid auctioned property, she has paid a sum of

Rs.5,32,50,000/- (Rupees Five Crores Thirty Two Lakh Fifty

Thousand Only) being 50% share of the auction amount.

Given under my hand and the seal of this Court in terms of

orders dated 28th October 2013, 15th May2014 & 05.07.2017.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

THE COLLECTOR OF STAMPS

SUB: CS(COMM) No. 1006/2016

Sub: Determination of the stamp duty and penalty payable.

1. Copy of orders dated 06.07.2017 & 20.07.2017 passed by Worthy Joint

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Mr. V. L. Madan, Advocate.

SUB: CS(OS) No. 1279/2005