Singh Et Al 2009 Vapor Liquid Phase Coexistence Critical Properties and Surface Tension of Confined Alkanes
Singh Et Al 2009 Vapor Liquid Phase Coexistence Critical Properties and Surface Tension of Confined Alkanes
Singh Et Al 2009 Vapor Liquid Phase Coexistence Critical Properties and Surface Tension of Confined Alkanes
properties are reported by means of the rectilinear diameter approach and least-squares technique. The shift
in the critical temperature under confinements follows more than two linear regimes with an inverse in the
Downloaded via HERIOT-WATT UNIV on February 27, 2024 at 13:58:58 (UTC).
slit width, as the slit width approaches the two-dimensional limit. This is contrary to what has been previously
reported in the literature. The behavior of the critical temperature shift is sensitive to the nature of the surface.
The critical density, on the other hand, fluctuates with a decrease in the slit width. The shift in the critical
vapor pressure continuously increases with a decrease in the slit width toward the two-dimensional value and
becomes constant for pore sizes less than 5 Å for the fluid studied in this work. Corresponding state plots
suggest that the deviation of the saturation vapor pressure from the bulk saturation pressure under confinement
is positive for large pores and negative for smaller pores. Vapor-liquid surface tension values for n-alkanes,
in both types of slit pores, are computed via the finite-size scaling method of Binder and compared with their
bulk values. Our investigation reveals that under slit-pore confinement the vapor-liquid surface tension
decreases many fold.
{ ]) ( ) ]}
a simulation, this information is used to obtain an estimate of
From the formalism of Binder,57 the infinite-size interfacial free aligned perpendicularly to the wall, a value of -0.5 if they are
energy of a two-dimensional surface can be evaluated using all parallel to the walls, and a value of 0 if they are randomly
the following relationship: oriented.
To perform the simulations in an efficient manner, we take
βFL 1 ln L advantage of the fact that the TMMC algorithm enables one to
βγL ) ) C1 + C2 + βγ∞ (9)
2S S S fill the overall collection matrix through a series of independent
where γL is the apparent system size-dependent surface tension simulations, each restricted to a limited range of macrostates.
and γ∞ is the infinite-system size (L f ∞) surface tension, S is In this work, we used a scheme in which a series of semi-
the interface area (LH), L and H are the simulation cell size independent simultaneous simulations sample overlapping win-
and pore width, respectively, and C1 and C2 are constants. The dows in the macrostates with periodic swapping of configura-
expression (9) suggests that the group βFL/2S becomes linear tions between processors. Further details can be found in ref
with the scaling variable (ln L)/S as the system size approaches 65. In our simulations, the Monte Carlo move distribution for
infinity. The method enables one to evaluate the infinite-system
size interfacial tension by extrapolating a series of finite-system
size interfacial free energies. This approach has now been
applied to obtain the surface tension of various fluids58-61 but
mainly in the bulk phase. Recently, we have applied it for the
evaluation of the vapor-liquid surface tension of a confined
square-well fluid.62
In this work, we have estimated the vapor-liquid critical
parameter by fitting the coexistence densities to the law of the
rectilinear diameter63 and the scaling law for the density.64
Fl - Fv ) B 1 - ( T
Tc ) β
(10)
(Fl + Fv) ⁄ 2 ) Fc + A 1 - ( T
Tc ) (11)
where Fl, Fv, Fc, Tc, and β are the liquid-phase density, vapor-
phase density, critical density, critical temperature, and critical
exponent, respectively.
The critical pressure, Pc, is calculated using the least-squares
fitting of the saturation pressure data obtained from the GC-
TMMC simulations to the following expression, which has a
form similar to that of the Antoine equation:
B
ln Pc ) A - (12)
Tc
where A and B are adjustable parameters. The above empirical
form is also utilized to obtain the critical pressure for confined
fluids, as shown earlier for a confined square-well fluid.62
The saturated z density profiles (profiles perpendicular to the
slit surface), Fz, are obtained by recording F(N,z) for each particle
number sampled during GC-TMMC simulations. Coexistence
density profiles are finally obtained using the following expres-
sion:
∑ Πc(i) F(i, z)
i∈vapor/liquid
F(z)vapor/liquid ) (13)
∑ Πc(i)
i∈vapor/liquid
where i is the particle number and its range varies for liquid
and vapor phases.
The orientation of the molecules in the slit pore is evaluated
using the following orientation order parameter (Sz), which is
defined as
Sz ) 〈 3 cos2R - 1 〉 (14)
where R is defined as the angle between the head-to-tail vector Figure 1. (a) Vapor-liquid coexistence envelope, (b) saturation
pressure, and (c) vapor-liquid surface tension of bulk methane,
of the alkane molecule and the z axis. Sz is evaluated for n-butane, and n-octane. Solid lines and filled and open symbols
coexistence liquid and vapor phases akin to the calculation of represent the data of the experiments,68 the exp-6 model with full range
coexistence density profiles, as described above. The orientation interaction, and the exp-6 model with rc ) 15 Å, respectively. The
order parameter takes a value of 1 if all of the molecules are error bars are smaller than the symbol size.
Properties of Confined Alkanes J. Phys. Chem. C, Vol. 113, No. 17, 2009 7173
Figure 4. Shift in the critical temperature ∆T* vs inverse of the slit Figure 5. Local z-density profiles of (a) the saturated vapor phase
width (H) for n-alkanes in (a) graphite and (b) mica slit pores. and (b) the saturated liquid phase of methane in graphite slit pores of
three different slit widths at a reduced temperature, TR ) 0.90.
1b presents the saturation vapor pressure of the bulk n-alkanes.
The behavior of the vapor pressure for the truncated exp-6 model graphite and mica slit pores of various slit widths. Typical phase
is similar to that seen for the orthobaric densities. The critical coexistence envelopes of methane and butane are shown in parts
pressure for the truncated exp-6 model, with rc ) 15 Å, is a and b of Figure 2, respectively, which present the transforma-
underestimated by 1.8%, 7.6%, and 8.6% for methane, butane, tion of the behavior from nearly three-dimensionally to two-
and n-octane, respectively. On the other hand, the full exp-6 dimensionally induced by the confinement. A large fraction of
model (nontruncated form) overestimates the critical pressure the confined molecules experience a reduction in the number
by 1.25%, 6.3%, and 6.5% for methane, butane, and n-octane, of nearest-neighbor molecules; hence, under confinement, a
respectively. lowering of the critical temperature is observed. The critical
The vapor-liquid surface tension is evaluated using a finite- temperature continues to decrease with a decrease in the slit
size scaling approach in a way similar to that reported in our width up to a certain extent, which for all of the cases is close
earlier work.69 The surface tension based on n-alkane with the to two to three molecular diameters. A subsequent decrease in
truncated exp-6 model, with rc ) 15 Å, is in good agreement the slit width has no effect on the critical temperature, and it
with the experimental data for methane and ethane; however, appears to become constant. The critical density, on the contrary,
for the larger alkanes, the truncated potential underestimates oscillates as we approach from bulk to two-dimensional
the surface tension, as shown in Figure 1c. The deviation from geometry, as observed in Figure 2a,b. In general, the critical
the experimental data gradually increases from propane to density at a large pore is higher than the bulk critical density.
octane. Our current investigation along with earlier work69 shows This is due to the layering of molecules in the vapor phase near
that the exp-6 model with full range interaction overestimates the surface, which increases the density of the vapor phase. The
the surface tension value of C1-C8 by 26%. On the other hand, stronger the surface, the higher would be the vapor density,
with a fixed rc ) 15 Å without LRC, the average absolute leading to higher critical density. However, such behavior is
deviation from the experimental values for methane, ethane, absent in smaller pores because of the decrease in saturated
propane, butane, and octane are 9, 2, 5, 12, and 16%, liquid densities. This trend is observed for all of the studied
respectively. To study the various coexistence and interfacial cases of alkanes, C1, C4, and C8, except for methane in a graphite
properties under different slit-pore confinements, we have used slit pore, which has shown lower critical density even for higher
a cutoff radius rc ) 15 Å without LRC in this work. This choice slit width, which is probably due to the relatively less effect of
of the cutoff radius seems to be reasonable based on the analysis the graphite surface on the vapor-phase density. Recently, Jiang
that most properties deviate slightly from the experimental and Sandler observed similar behavior of higher critical density
values for C1-C8. and a lowering of the critical temperature for C1-C8 in a carbon
Phase coexistence properties and critical properties of n- nanotube.25 In addition, we observed that, as the system
alkanes of carbon chains C1, C4, and C8 are investigated in approaches the two-dimensional regime, the critical density
Properties of Confined Alkanes J. Phys. Chem. C, Vol. 113, No. 17, 2009 7175
Figure 8. Temperature dependence on the density and orientational profiles of n-octane in a mica slit pore for a 30 Å slit width. Plots a and b are
saturated liquid and vapor density profiles, respectively, and the corresponding orientation profiles are in given in parts c and d, respectively.
Parts a and b of Figure 6 present corresponding state plots shown in Figure 8. Parts a and b of Figure 8 indicate that, with
of coexistence envelopes of n-butane and n-octane in terms of an increase in the temperature, the density of the liquid phase
reduced temperature (T/Tc) and density (F/Fc) for pores with in each layer decreases, whereas the density of the vapor
two different slit widths, 40 and 8 Å. Figure 6a shows that, at phase increases, as expected. This is also evident from the phase
larger slit width, the coexistence density of the vapor phase in coexistence plots of Figures 2 and 6. On the other hand, the
a mica slit pore is more than that in a graphite slit pore, whereas orientation of the molecules in the liquid and vapor phases does
the reverse is the case for the liquid-phase density. However, not change appreciably with a change in the temperature,
in a smaller slit-width pore, for example, 8 Å, surface especially near the slit surfaces, as shown in Figure 8c,d. This
characteristics appear to be noninfluential, as seen in Figure 6b, is in agreement with the experimental evidence with long-chain
which shows an indistinguishable behavior of coexistence n-alkanes in the slit-pore confinement.73 The experimental
densities for fluids in graphite and mica pores at two to three evidence of ref 73 along with our study indicates that a change
molecular diameter slit pores. To gain insight into this behavior, in the temperature has insignificant influence on the orientation
local density and orientational profiles are being studied. Parts of the molecules near the surface.
a and b of Figure 7 present z-density profiles and corresponding The vapor-pressure data of a pure substance are fundamentally
orientation profiles of n-octane in a 30 Å slit width and at a important for phase equilibrium calculations and engineering
reduced temperature of 0.93. Figure 7a shows that, in spite of applications, such as distillation, evaporation, and two-phase
having greater density in the first layer of the liquid-phase reactors. We have investigated the effect of the extent of
profile, which is attributed to the stronger attractive nature of confinement in two different types of slit pores on the saturation
mica as compared to the graphite surface, the overall average vapor pressure for a range of temperatures. Parts a and b of
liquid density in a mica slit pore is less than that in a graphite Figure 9 show comparisons of the saturation vapor pressure in
slit pore. In contrast, the average density in the vapor phase in confinement with respect to bulk, in a corresponding state plot.
a mica pore is more than that in a graphite pore. Similar behavior Saturation vapor pressures under either type of confinement
is observed for other alkanes in higher slit-width pores. A (graphite and mica) show positive and negative deviation with
comparison of the orientation profiles of n-octane in Figure 7b respect to the bulk value at a give reduced temperature. The
shows that the molecules in each layer are ordered and lie saturation vapor pressure at larger slit width is more than that
parallel to the walls (Sz < 0). As the distance from the wall of bulk at a given reduced temperature; for n-octane, this value
increases, the orientation order fluctuates and eventually ter- is approximately 20 Å in mica and graphite. A subsequent
minates at zero, indicative of the random nature of the system. decrease in the slit width (as seen for 10 and 8 Å) reduces the
We have studied the temperature dependence of the density and reduced vapor pressure, which is substantially smaller than the
corresponding orientation profiles of liquid and vapor phases corresponding bulk value. A deviation of the reduced vapor
of a typical case of n-alkane (n-octane) in a mica slit pore, as pressure from the corresponding bulk value is seen as larger
Properties of Confined Alkanes J. Phys. Chem. C, Vol. 113, No. 17, 2009 7177
Figure 9. Variation of reduced saturation vapor pressures vs reduced temperature of the bulk and confined n-octane in (a) graphite and (b) mica
slit pores of varying slit widths. Solid lines represent bulk values; filled and open symbols show positive and negative deviations, respectively. Part
c shows the shift in the critical pressure ∆P* of butane and octane with the inverse of the slit width (H) in graphite (G) and mica (M) slit pores.
for a mica pore because of its stronger attraction. Chen et al.74 critical pressure shift is completely in contrast with the non-
earlier predicted that the nanocapillary pressure of n-hexadecane monotonic behavior seen for the critical temperature and density.
in terms of ln(P/Ps) vs 1/r oscillates when the capillary size, r, Figure 9c also reflects that the nature of the surface is more
approaches a few molecular diameter, which suggests that the dominant on the critical pressure, particularly at larger slit
behavior of fluids in a nanosize capillary deviates from that of widths, which is not seen for the critical temperature. Such an
Kelvin’s equation. In this work, specific calculations to check effect diminishes and disappears as the slit width is reduced
the behavior of Kelvin’s equation in small pores have not been toward the two-dimensional value.
performed; however, a certain indication of the deviation from One of the advantageous aspects of the GC-TMMC method
Kelvin’s equation is probably reflected in our saturation vapor is that it can be used in conjunction with the finite-size-scaling
pressures (pressure component parallel to the slit surfaces and (FSS) technique of Binder57 to evaluate surface tension values.
perpendicular to the vapor-liquid interface), under confinement, The effectiveness of this technique over other methods is
as shown in Figure 9a,b. Nevertheless, a more rigorous study demonstrated by Singh and Kofke.60 This technique also benefits
is required to test the correctness of Kelvin’s equation and a from the ease with which calculations can be performed using
modified version of it74 for n-alkane in nanocapillaries, which multiple processors. The combined GC-TMMC + FSS method
is out of the scope of the current work and is reserved for a has been used to determine surface tension values for Lennard-
future study. Jones,51 square-well,60 model associating fluids61 and chain
We have also evaluated vapor-liquid critical pressures under molecules.69 In this work, we have investigated the effect of
various confinement using eq 12, in the same way as was the surface characteristics and the extent of confinement on the
reported for bulk n-alkanes69 and confined square-well fluids62 vapor-liquid surface tension of n-alkanes. Our investigation
in earlier investigations. Equation 12 is used as a fitting tool to indicates that the bulk vapor-liquid surface tension of n-alkanes
calculate the critical pressure once the critical temperature is decreases under confinement of graphite (G) and mica (M) slit
obtained. Such usage of eq 12 is based on the observation that pores. This reduction of the surface tension is attributed to the
the logarithm of the saturation pressure under confinement, reduction in the vapor-liquid surface free energy due to
ln(P), scales linearly with 1/T, in a way similar to that for the confinement. Parts a-e of Figure 10 present a comparison of
bulk vapor pressure.69 In Figure 9c, we have shown the shift in the vapor-liquid surface tension of bulk n-alkane evaluated with
the critical pressure, ∆P* ) (Pcb - Pcp)/Pcb, where Pcb is the the truncated exp-6 potential with rc ) 15 Å and the same under
bulk critical pressure and Pcp is the confined critical pressure, different slit-pore confinement. The surface tension diminishes
with the inverse of the slit width. The behavior seen for the with a decrease in the slit width because for a given temperature
7178 J. Phys. Chem. C, Vol. 113, No. 17, 2009 Singh et al.
Figure 10. Vapor-liquid surface tensions of bulk and confined (a) methane, (b) ethane, (c) propane, (d) butane, and (e) octane in graphite (G) and
mica (M) pores for two slit widths, 20 and 30 Å. Solid lines represent the bulk surface tension value (data points are the same as those reported
in Figure 1c, with open symbols) obtained with rc ) 15 Å without LRC. In part f, the surface tensions of bulk and confined methane, ethane,
butane, and octane are shown versus the reduced temperature (T/Tc). Surface tensions of confined n-alkanes are shown only with 30 Å slit width
of graphite and mica surfaces, with dotted and solid lines representing fits to the data of bulk and confined n-alkanes, respectively. Filled and open
symbols represent the surface tension values of fluids in graphite and mica slit pores, respectively, and have the same meaning as those in parts
a-e. Half-filled symbols (half-left triangle for methane, half-square for ethane, half-circle for butane, and half-pentagon for octane), in part f,
represent bulk phase simulated data points of n-alkanes. The error bars are smaller than the symbol size.
the free energy difference with respect to the interface decreases observed for the smaller pore width of 20 Å, which perhaps is
with a reduction in the slit width. However, for a constant slit the signature of insensitiveness of the thermophysical properties
width, the interfacial free energy decreases with an increase of toward the surface characteristic at such a scale of confinement.
the temperature; hence, the vapor-liquid surface tension This is also reflected from the corresponding state plot of
decreases with an increase of the temperature as expected. We orthobaric densities, as seen in Figure 6b. Figure 10f presents
also observed that, in general, at the same absolute temperature, the vapor-liquid surface tension of bulk and confined n-alkanes
for a 30 Å slit width, the reduction in the vapor-liquid surface as a function of reduced temperatures (T/Tc). Interestingly, the
tension from the bulk is more for the mica (M) slit pore than surface tension values of all typical bulk n-alkanes, except for
for the graphite (G) slit pore, especially for comparatively longer methane, studied in this work fall reasonably around one linear
chain molecules (C3 or higher). Conversely, this trend is not curve, as shown by the dotted line for the range of studied
Properties of Confined Alkanes J. Phys. Chem. C, Vol. 113, No. 17, 2009 7179
(24) Jiang, J. W.; Sandler, S. I.; Schenk, M.; Smit, B. Phys. ReV. B (50) Errington, J. R. Phys. ReV. E 2003, 67, 012102.
2005, 72, 045447. (51) Errington, J. R. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 9915.
(25) Jiang, J. W.; Sandler, S. I. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2005, 228, 189. (52) Berg, B. A.; Nneuhaus, T. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1992, 61, 9.
(26) Duren, T.; Sarkisov, L.; Yaghi, O. M.; Snurr, R. Q. Langmuir 2004, (53) Fitzgerald, M.; Picard, R. R.; Silver, R. N. Europhys. Lett. 1999,
20, 2683. 46, 282.
(27) Frost, H.; Duren, T.; Snurr, R. Q. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, (54) Fitzgerald, M.; Picard, R. R.; Silver, R. N. J. Stat. Phys. 2000, 98,
9565. 321.
(28) Zhang, F. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 9082. (55) Ferrenberg, A. M.; Swendsen, R. H. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1988, 61,
(29) Do, D. D.; Do, H. D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 19288. 2635.
(30) Kowalczyk, P.; Tanaka, H.; Kaneko, K.; Terzyk, A. P.; Do, D. D. (56) Goujon, F. M.; Boutin, A.; Fuchs, A. H. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116,
Langmuir 2005, 21, 5639. 8106.
(31) Vishnyakov, A.; Piotrovskaya, E. M.; Brodskaya, E. N. Langmuir (57) Binder, K. Phys. ReV. A 1982, 25, 1699.
1996, 12, 3643. (58) Potoff, J. J.; Panagiotopoulos, A. Z. J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112,
(32) Klochko, V. A.; Brodskaya, E. N.; Piotrovskaya, E. M. Langmuir 6411.
1999, 15, 545. (59) Singh, J. K.; Kofke, D. A.; Errington, J. R. J. Chem. Phys. 2003,
(33) Calleja, G.; Coto, B.; Pinar, A.; Morales-Cas, A. M. Adsorption 119, 3405.
2006, 12, 45. (60) Singh, J. K.; Kofke, D. A. Mol. Simul. 2004, 30, 343.
(34) Do, D. D.; Do, H. D. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60, 1977. (61) Singh, J. K.; Kofke, D. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121, 9574.
(35) Severson, B. L.; Snurr, R. Q. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 134708. (62) Singh, J. K.; Kwak, S. K. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 24702.
(36) Balasundaram, R.; Jiang, S. Y.; Belak, J. Chem. Eng. J. 1999, 74, (63) Rowlinson, J. S.; Swinton, F. L. Liquids and Liquid Mixtures, 3rd
117. ed.; Butterworth: London, 1982.
(37) Wang, J. C.; Fichthorn, K. A. Colloids Surf. A 2002, 206, 267. (64) Rowlinson, J. S.; Widom. B. Molecular Theory of Capillarity;
(38) Cui, S. T.; Gupta, S. A.; Cummings, P. T.; Cochran, H. D. J. Chem. Clarendon: Oxford, U.K., 1982.
Phys. 1996, 105, 1214. (65) Errington, J. R. Langmuir 2004, 20, 3798.
(39) Cui, S. T.; Cummings, P. T.; Cochran, H. D.; Moore, J. D.; Gupta, (66) Baidakov, V. G.; Chernykh, G. G.; Protsenko, S. P. Chem. Phys.
S. A. Int. J. Thermophys. 1998, 19, 449. Lett. 2000, 321, 315.
(40) Martini, A.; Liu, Y.; Snurr, R. Q.; Wang, Q. J. Tribol. Lett. 2006, (67) Goujon, F.; Malfreyt, P.; Boutin, A.; Fuchs, A. H. J. Chem. Phys.
21, 217. 2002, 116, 8106.
(41) Ryckaert, J. P.; Bellemans, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1975, 30, 123. (68) NIST Chemistry Web Book. http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/
(42) Errington, J. R.; Panagiotopoulos, A. Z. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, fluid.
103, 6314. (69) Singh, J. K.; Errington, J. R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 1369.
(43) Van der Ploeg, P.; Berendsen, H. J. C. J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 76, (70) Bruno, E.; Marini Bettolo Marconi, U.; Evans, R. Physica A 1987,
3271. 141, 187.
(44) Smit, B.; Karaborni, S.; Siepmann, J. I. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, (71) Vishnyakov, A.; Piotrovskaya, E. M.; Brodskaya, E. N.; Votyakov,
2126. E. V.; Tovbin, Yu. K. Langmuir 2001, 17, 4451.
(45) Steele, W. A. Surf. Sci. 1972, 36, 317. (72) Subimal, J.; Singh, J. K.; Kwak, S. K. J. Chem. Phys. 2008,
(46) Porcheron, F.; Rousseau, B.; Fuchs, A. H.; Schoen, M. Phys. Chem. submitted for publication.
Chem. Phys. 1999, 1, 4083. (73) Maeda, N.; Kohonen, M. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 5906.
(47) Siepmann, J. I.; Frenkel, D. Mol. Phys. 1992, 75, 59. (74) Chen, Y.; Wetzel, T.; Aranovich, G. L.; Donohue, M. D. J. Colloid
(48) De Pablo, J. J.; Laso, M.; Suter, U. W. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, Interface Sci. 2006, 300, 45.
2395. (75) Wilding, N. B. Phys. ReV. E 1995, 52, 602.
(49) Rosenbluth, M. N.; Rosenbluth, A. W. J. Chem. Phys. 1956, 23,
356. JP8073915