Review of Related Literature and Studies
Review of Related Literature and Studies
Review of Related Literature and Studies
The majority of college students have jobs, and the effects of student work on mental
have been thoroughly studied. On the other hand, the effects of this labor on other facets of
students' life have not been thoroughly studied. What issues and problems encountered by the
working students in terms of their academic performances? This is only one question that will be
answered on this study. We used our methodological approach of student-driven research and a
quantitative analysis, we find that different effects of working while studying effects on students'
lives: it makes students' schedules less flexible, making them more susceptible to emergencies; it
makes financial calculations more difficult for students to do; it can negatively affect students'
mental and social lives; and, in spite of these negative effects, students find work to be fulfilling.
This study makes use of the Moral Responsibility Theory of P.F. Strawson,
Sociobiology Theory of Edward Wilson, and the Existential Theory by Soren Kierkegaard and
Friedrich Nietzsche The Moral Responsibility Theory of P.F. Strawson published in 1962
presents the consequences of each action in the pros and cons result. It can be defined in
Philosophy as the status of morally worthy praise, reward, blame, or punishment for an act
performed or Neglected by one's moral obligations accompanied by the three essential elements:
accountability, freedom, and results that can be either praiseworthy or blameworthy. This theory
shapes the pros and cons of the life experiences of working students. As indicated by Watts and
Pickering (2000), working part-time and studying full-time has a variety of positive outcomes
contemporary higher education sphere. However, the student might experience under pressure
due to demands in academics such as completing the tasks in the given time and instability
regarding finances. The work plus studies make these hardworking students sleep deprived, and
HEALTH ISSUES AMONG WORKING STUDENTS
sleep deprivation increases the risk factors of insomnia and damage to brain function. Working
students exposed to excessive workload despite the satisfactory salary will have bad effects on
Working students' college experiences are explored in a study using the grounded
theory approach. Students engaged in part-time and sometimes full-time employment while
prepare the students for their future profession. While ordinary experiences will comprise the
majority of the data content of this study, these data will be analyzed and justified using
particular theories.
students' mental and physical health because student health is associated with academic
measures. For example, worse psychological health, such as greater levels of psychological
symptoms, depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, substance use, emotional problems, and
hopelessness; and
decreased levels of social functioning and mental health were associated with worse GPA,
(Billingsley & Hurd, 2019; De Luca et al., 2016, Carney, McNeish, & McColl, 2005; Horton,
2015; McMahon et al., 2011; Raskind, Haardörfer, & Berg, 2019, Oswalt & Wyatt, 2011; Smith,
Jaurique, & Ryan, 2016, Vaez & Laflamune, 2008, Wyatt & Oswalt, 2013). Further, greater
stress is associated frequently with decreased GPA, student engagernent, college persistence,
and completion of an academic program (Akgun & Ciarrochi, 2003; Bachrach & Read, 2012:
Elias, Ping, & Abdullah, 2011; Johnson et al., 2013; Oswalt & Wyatt, 2011; Raufelder et al.,
HEALTH ISSUES AMONG WORKING STUDENTS
2013; Schraml et al., 2012; Sohail, 2012; Stewart et al., 1999, Vaez & Laflamme, 2008). In
addition, greater self-reported physical health, general health and pain, headaches, abdominal
pain, and physical problems were associated with worse GPA, student engagement, academic
persistence, and program completion (Carney, McNeish, & McColl, 2005, Grimby-Ekman et al.,
2018, Horton, 2015; Smith, Jaurique, & Ryan, 2016; Vaez & Laflamme, 2008). Moreover, poor
sleep was associated with declines in academic measures, with numerous studies having found
aspects of sleep, including later sleep onset, shorter sleep length/duration, greater sleep
irregularity, increased daytime sleepiness, poorer overall sleep quality, and more sleep problems
all had been associated with decreased GPA, student engagement, and study concentration
(Dunbar, Mirpuri, & Yip, 2017, Howell, et al., 2004; Medeiros et al., 2001, Miller, Danner, &
Staten, 2008; Pagel, Forister, & Kwiatkowki, 2007; Singelton & Wolfson, 2009; Talib & Zia-ur-
Heijden et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2003). This study aimed to contribute to the
existing literature on how work demands influence health and how health affects the relationship
between work demands and academic measures. In addition, the research examines how health
factors
influenced study hours and credits completed, which is sparse in the literature. Beyond just
student work demands, psychosocial factors such as a sense of belonging and perceived
injustice contribute to academic measures and health, and health may indirectly affect the
relationship between psychosocial factors and academic measures in working college students.
Pascarella and Padgett (in Lederman 2009), sought to examine the effects of work
on academic performance and observed how students who devoted their time into on- and off-
HEALTH ISSUES AMONG WORKING STUDENTS
campus work contributed on the students critical thinking, moral reasoning, socially responsible
leadership, and mental well-being. Results revealed that working 20 hours and more had a
positive effect on students' psychological well-being, and students who worked off campus also
trended positively on leadership skills. Work did not have much bad effect on cognitive type of
outcomes like moral reasoning and critical thinking, but work has a positive result on things like
psychological well-being and leadership even when one is working a ton of hours.
Findings further showed that there were significant differences in the impact on
students who came into college with different academic abilities, with much more can cause
harm to students who scored lower on college entrance exams. Working on campus between 1-
10 hours a week had a positive effect on critical thinking for high-ability students but a strong
students
in the country are currently misrepresenting school and work and this figure is about 8%
of the total number of college students in the country. CHED said that working students today
are mostly into food service, entertainment and sales, apart from their usual stints as librarians
and
research assistants. "One of the reasons why students need an extra income is due to a financial
Vitriolo. He also added that because of higher commodity prices and tuition fees, these students
are forced to work independently. The CHED stated that only half of working students get to
HEALTH ISSUES AMONG WORKING STUDENTS
finish college, as many cannot adapt and cannot concentrate on their studies, while some have
poor health, while others didn't continue because of financial problems. CHED
recommended working students to have jobs that are not too demanding and that is more related
In the study of Fjorto (1995), reported that "the student who devotes more time to
employment, the less he or she has for either academic or social activities.” Some studies have
looked at the effects of working on social and academic integration or student engagement. This
concept is an important component in student’s behavior theory (Bean, 1985; Pascarella &
Staver, 1985; Tinto, 1975) that has long been linked with perseverance (Kuh, 1995; Pascarella &
Terrenzini, 1983). Richard (2004), emphasized that information about students is important but
time-consuming to manage and it is the most essential tool that will be used to help both staff
and students cope up with their work and studies. The Cambridge Student Information System
(CAMSIS) replaced various student records system used by the colleges, departments, and
universities. CAMSIS provides comprehensive and accurate information about the student’s
body and also improves data quality, reduce the administrative burden dramatically and provides
better services to both academic staff and students. Another benefit lies in the feeling of self-
achievement and self-satisfaction that is achieved through challenging oneself with double the
workload and two different lifestyles. It is all about pushing oneself to the limits and proving to
the world that one can manage their time in the best possible way and make the most of it by
working and studying at the same time. It also believed that such an attitude reflects the abilities
of hard work and determination in people, which are qualities that every firm generally looks for.
HEALTH ISSUES AMONG WORKING STUDENTS
Alli
(2010), stressed that the combination of working and studying together is the key to success and
is the foundation on which one's future and career depends. The evidence suggests that the
effects of working while in college vary by the type of job held: full-time versus part-time, and
on-campus versus off-campus. Harmful effects typically arise because hours spent at work take
time away from studying which may lead to lower grades and less attractive post-college
opportunities. Working may contribute to students dropping out of college or taking a little bit
more time to graduate. But student employment can also be a positive experience. For example,
some workers may gain experience from their job that helps them in the classroom or in the labor
market environment after college. Oncampus jobs may also build connections to academic
departments or the community at large, which in turn may make students more likely to stay in
academic performances. Findings revealed that college student's employment did not affect
academic achievement. This finding is surprising considering the amount of research that has
found many positive and negative significant factors affecting academic achievement while
being employed. The study did not contribute to both the positive or negative relationship
between working and the succession of the academic aspect. Pike in Lederman (2009), found
that there are several amounts of on and off-campus work that directly influenced students' self-
reported grades and indirectly affected their levels of engagement in academic activities.
HEALTH ISSUES AMONG WORKING STUDENTS
Working more than 20 hours a week hurts students' grades, whether the employment is on
campus or off.
As reported, students who work 20 hours or less, on and off campus have similar
grades as do students who do not work at all. The indirect relationships between employment and
are more complicated. Students who work 20 hours or less a week on campus report higher
levels on all five levels of engagement used. Moreover, working 20 hours or less off- campus
strengthens students' performance on two of the five engagement levels, whereas students who
work 20 hours or more, on or off-campus did tend to be more engaged than students who did not
work at all.